The White House Still Dealing With Rod Blagojevich Baggage

As expected, the trial of former Gov. Big Hair is proving a nuisance for the administration of Barack Obama, which has plenty of other things to worry about far more pressing than what political favors were and were not traded, discussed or rejected years ago in the shadowy underworld known as Chicago politics.

Issue #1 came to light on Monday, thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request by the Associated Press. As the AP writes:

President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, then a congressman in Illinois, apparently attempted to trade favors with embattled Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich while he was in office, according to newly disclosed e-mails obtained by The Associated Press. Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, agreed to sign a letter to the Chicago Tribune supporting Blagojevich in the face of a scathing editorial by the newspaper that ridiculed the governor for self-promotion. Within hours, Emanuel’s own staff asked for a favor of its own: The release of a delayed $2 million grant to a school in his district. The 2006 discussion with Blagojevich’s top aide, Deputy Gov. Bradley Tusk, doesn’t appear to cross legal lines, and Emanuel couldn’t speed up the distribution of the funds.

That last sentence is no doubt a relief to Emanuel and the White House, if not entirely exculpatory in the court of public opinion. See here for a description of how this incident has already been raised in the ongoing trial.

Issue #2 In testimony today, the uncomfortable proximity of Obama and his staff to the criminal investigation was further laid bare, even though there is no evidence that Obama or Emanuel were willing to participate in the governor’s allegedly criminal designs. As has been previously reported, Blagojevich was angry at the Obama camp for not paying better tribute. But as this bit of tape makes clear, aides to the future president of the United States may have been passing information to the governor through another man who was, at the time, actively working with the Feds as part of the sting. All a wee bit uncomfortable.

Issue #3 Perhaps most disturbing for the White House is the fact that lawyers for Blagojevich seem determined to bring President Obama into the middle of the trial. At the start of the trial, the judge rejected a defense request to subpoena President Obama. But on Wednesday, the defense tried again, asking for copies of the notes taken by FBI investigators who interviewed President-elect Obama in December of 2008. At issue is whether or not the president-elect knew that Blagojevich was interested in a cabinet position in exchange for appointing Jarrett. (Obama’s own investigation of the matter stated that the president-elect did not know about the request. Jarrett, however, was told of Blagojevich’s interest in a cabinet position by a union leader, who had spoken with the Blogojevich camp.) According to a motion filed Wednesday, “Testimony elicited by the government from John Harris and wiretaps played in court raise the issue of President Obama’s direct knowledge and communication with emissaries and others regarding the appointment to his senate seat.” The judge has taken the request under advisement.

To follow all the twists and turns of the trial, read the Chicago Sun Times’ Blago Blog.

Related Topics: Chicago, rahm emanuel, rod blagojevich, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Why the FOX link at “AP writes”? Why not link directly to the story. I was curious about who wrote it.
    .
    “doesn’t appear to cross legal lines”
    .
    “no evidence that Obama or Emanuel were willing to participate in the governor’s allegedly criminal designs”
    .
    Perhaps it is not just the defense lawyers who want to tie this to BHO.
    .
    Ah our media.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    That last sentence is no doubt a relief to Emanuel and the White House, if not entirely exculpatory in the court of public opinion…. the uncomfortable proximity of Obama and his staff to the criminal investigation was further laid bear, even though there is no evidence that Obama or Emanuel were willing to participate in the governor’s allegedly criminal designs.
    -
    Cover the trial, it’s news, that’s fine.
    -
    But this tone and thesis that “WH still dealing with Blago” when your own article indicates that there is no evidence whatsoever of bad stuff actively serves to disinform your readers.

  • m0mentom0ri

    “As expected, the trial of former Gov. Big Hair is proving a nuisance for the administration of Barack Obama”

    The only way that sentence makes sense in the context of…
    .
    “doesn’t appear to cross legal lines”
    .
    “there is no evidence that Obama or Emanuel were willing to participate in the governor’s allegedly criminal designs.”
    .
    “the president-elect did not know”
    .
    …is if the media, in their pursuit of a salacious story, ignores the facts and decide to play guilt by association games with headlines like:
    .
    “The White House Still Dealing With Rod Blagojevich Baggage”
    .
    But what would I expect from a media that thinks “Gov Big Hair” is a term that should by used by a journalist? I can’t wait for the next article about “Sen. Doodypants”

  • m0mentom0ri

    I need to learn to type faster – Paul and Elvis beat me to the draw :-)

  • merlanai

    Blago would try to subpoena POTUS.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Issue #3 Perhaps most disturbing for the White House is the fact that lawyers for Blagojevich seem determined to bring President Obama into the middle of the trial. At the start of the trial, the judge rejected a defense request to subpoena President Obama. But on Wednesday, the defense tried again, asking for copies of the notes taken by FBI investigators who interviewed President-elect Obama in December of 2008. At issue is whether or not the president-elect knew that Blagojevich was interested in a cabinet position in exchange for appointing Jarrett.”

    .
    Let’s see if I have this correct.
    .
    1. Rep Joe Sestak was “offered” a job. Valarie Jarrett wanted to be the next Senator from Illinois, but Blago wanted some “compensation” for the “official” appointment.
    .
    2. Andrew Romanoff was offered a position in Obama’s USAID agency by Barack Obama’s Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina in exchange for dropping his primary challenge against Senator Michael Bennett.
    .
    Again, please tell us your readers what the difference all of this might be? Why is it that Blago goes on trial for a possible felony, but Obama walks away with the meme in hand this is all politics as usual, nothing to see here folks, move along please.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    One thing to bear in mind, even within the context of “the shadowy underworld known as Chicago politics”, Blago is a piece of work. Besides which, fairness would dictate that the phrase read “the shadowy underworld known as Illinois politics.” After all the gentleman convicted of selling Commercial drivers licences was from Kankakee…… And who can forget Jack Ryan’s contribution to Obama’s career?

  • FlownOver

    “Laid bear?”

    Is this a story about Blagojevich or Santorum?

  • tiggymow

    It really makes a lot of sense when you actually think about it.

    Lou
    http://www.anon-vpn.at.tc

  • constantweader

    Re: Item #1: Why exactly is it so corrupt that you want funds, already appropriated, released to build a school? Isn’t getting school funds a good thing? Are we supposed to be shocked, shocked that Emanuel wanted Blago to fork over monies to pay for a school?

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • apr2563

    Thank you FlownOver. That was my biggest laugh today. Man on bear is more impressive than man on dog.

  • apr2563

    This is the MS we know and love. A meaningless posting about speculation, no proof, but it makes his day easier.

  • http://rageagainstthewingnuts.wordpress.com rageagainstthewingnuts

    I know there is a saying that goes “Idle mind is devil’s workshop”.
    .
    But in case of MS, better an idle mind than the one that broadcasts your incompetence to the whole wide world.

  • berniecarbo

    Blago won’t stop dragging anyone and everyone into his mud (see latest victim Alexi Giannoulias today). He’s been out there for the last 19 months trying to blur and confuse everyone about his activities (see http://rodblagojevich.com). The White House and Obama just happen to be big, newsworthy targets.

blog comments powered by Disqus