Recall the Recall?

Politico has an interesting story about about Tea Party efforts in several states to recall politicians — when, you know, the electoral thing just isn’t working for you. Bob Menendez in New Jersey, Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu and Kent Conrad of North Dakota have all been targeted.

Yes, because the $66 million recall of California Governor Gray Davis was money well spent.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: arnold schwarzenegger, Bob Menendez, California, gray davis, kent conrad, mary landrieu, recall, Democratic Party, Economy, Republican Party, State Governments
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • certifiablylazy

    Doesn’t this all – recall, “ignoring” the will of the people during HCR, etc. – all support a move to a true “one person, one vote” system.

    It won’t stop losers trying to recall winners, but…

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Another missed opportunity to mention that the notion recalling Senators has no Constitutional basis. But I guess the Tea partiers are pretty selective when it comes to defending the Constitution.

  • nflfoghorn

    Davis was fired because of Enron–so The Actuh really came in and financially Callie is worse off than ever. Still makes my blood boil.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Well, I was hoping for a post on Tony Hayward’s yacht race but this’ll keep us royally po’ed and yelling at each other instead of at YOU, Kate, etc. busy until your next finance reform update (thx for those, btw). You might remember that the Menendez suit has been game on for quite awhile –
    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/02/17/4433074-tea-partiers-seek-to-recall-us-senator

  • stuartzechman

    Really well said again, deconstructiva.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, stuart. I read your comments + Ivy’s earlier about no-multiple-links in replies. I have that problem too. I’m guessing it’s a WordPress problem or the High Sheriffs would’ve fixed it.

  • http://www.124monkeys.com Sean DeCoursey forgot his password

    Not to defend Arnold’s record, but California is going to have a screwed up budget no matter who is Governor until they fix their property tax laws. Especially prop 13.

  • nflfoghorn

    You’re right, but the early TPers made everyone think Mr. Terminator would right all wrongs. Heck, he wasn’t even a conservative. You deserve what you get sometimes.

  • http://flounder73.wordpress.com pafro

    Since an attempt to recall a senator is clearly unconstitutional, the word “interesting” must mean something different than what I thought it did.

  • deconstructiva

    How is it clearly unconstitutional? Only elections and expulsions are explicitly spelled out; nothing else is mentioned (therefore undefined). Does unsaid stuff (like recalls?) become states’ rights under 10th A.? (granted there are a few constitutional conflicts, like 10th A. vs. Commerce Clause, etc.)

blog comments powered by Disqus