Sessions on Kagan

About six minutes in to the speech Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jeff Sessions, an Alabama Republican, focuses on a center for Islamic studies founded at Harvard during Elena Kagan’s tenure as the Dean of Harvard Law. An excerpt:

Around the same time that Dean Kagan was campaigning to exclude military recruiters, citing what she saw as the evils of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, Harvard University accepted $20 million from a member of the Saudi royal family to establish a center for Islamic studies and law. The Obama State Department report concerning Saudi Arabia noted “under Shah Reyarks [sic from transcript] as interpreted by Saudi Arabia’s sexual activity between two persons of the same gender, is punishable by death or flogging.” She was perfectly willing to obstruct the military, which has liberated countless Muslims from the hate and tyranny of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban but it seems she was willing to sit on the sidelines as Harvard created a center funded and dedicated to foreign leaders presiding over a legal system that would violate what would appear to be her positions. She fought the ability of our own soldiers to access campus resources but not those who spread the oppressive tenets of Shari’a-type law.

The center wasn’t merely dedicated to Islamic law but all Islamic studies and was open to any part of the university, not just the Law School. Yes, Kagan as Dean did not sponsor military recruiters at Harvard Law because of her opposition to Don’t Ask Don’t Tell — though that was a moderated stance, she could joined a coalition of law schools that actually challenged the law in court. But saying she tacitly supported Shari’a-type law because she didn’t oppose the founding of a center outside of her school built to promote cultural understanding seems like a bit of a stretch — actually a really big stretch. If this is all Sessions has on her, her confirmation hearing really is going to be a snoozer.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: don't ask don't tell, elena kagan, harvard, islamic center, jeff sessions, Congress, Republican Party, Senate, Supreme Court
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    SESSIONS ON KAGAN
    .
    She’s not qualified to be a Supreme Court justice ’cause:
    .
    1) She can’t control what goes on outside of school property
    2) She doesn’t stand for what Jeff Sessions stands for
    3) She won’t sit in the corner and be quiet like Clarence
    4) She’s not a kook like I am
    5) We’re over the quota limit of Jewish females on the bench.
    ______
    That’s it in a nutshell.

  • gysgt213

    “But saying she tacitly supported Shari’a-type law because she didn’t oppose the founding of a center outside of her school built to promote cultural understanding seems like a bit of a stretch — actually a really big stretch.”
    .
    JNS-This isn’t a stretch big or otherwise. Sessions is making sh*t up out of thin air. He is lying. He knows he lying and you know he is lying, but he is not afraid to lie because its really about just getting this kind of silly dumb crap into the mainstream media and he knows none of you will ever call him dumb, stupid and silly.

  • gysgt213

    I should also add that by saying its a stretch of any kind means there is a grain of truth to what he saying. The only grain of truth here is that a big bad scary religion, one we have been learn’t to be afraid of built a friggin center.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Was Sessions as worked up about ties between the Houses of Bush & Saud? Was he as concerned about Saudi Arabia’s threat when we attacked Afghanistan & not the nation nearly all of the hijackers came from?
    .
    Yes, we all know that academic study of Islam/Islamic law is a euphemism meaning to “spread the oppressive tenets of Shari’a-type law.” What a f’ing neanderthal.

  • kevin

    I love how he arrives at “campaigning to exclude military recruiters” from (1) Kagan’s mere signing onto an amicus brief that countless other deans signed and (2) moving military recruiters to another part of the law school where they actually increased their recruitment numbers.
    .
    I’d say he’s an embarrassment, but given the idiots the Alabama Republicans are putting forth for office these days, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions the Third seems like a freaking genius by comparison.

  • bobcn1

    Exactly.

  • sacredh

    If this wasn’t typical of Sessions I’d be a little outraged. It is typical so it rates a shrug and a so-what. It’s just Sessions being Sessions again.

  • kevin

    I love the whole “liberals want to impose sharia” theme that conservatives are embracing, from Sessions to that Oklahoma lawmaker.
    .
    Because when you think “liberal judges” the first thing that comes to mind is a system that denies freedom of speech, suppresses women’s rights, outlaws homosexuality, and imposes biblical fundamentalism on all of society.
    .
    Saying liberal judges want to “impose sharia law” is about as crazy as saying southern conservatives keep shoving “San Francisco values” down our throats.

  • deconstructiva

    Sessions on Kagan…
    .
    …that would’ve put the orientation issue to bed once and for all.
    .
    (Sorry Jay, the title was too much to resist. Did you really set up a double entendre?)

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I agree. As long as fact checking is just a game that reporters play for fun instead of their number one job responsibility, lying will continue to be a profitable activity.

  • kevin

    Speaking of Kagan, there’s a great piece at the Atlantic on what her pick says about the administration.
    .
    http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/06/what-obama-sees-in-kagan/58227/

  • apr2563

    Jay, I can’t bear to watch the video. Session’s voice is like fingernails on a blackboard. He will do his little tap dance, she will get through committee without his vote, and then be confirmed by the whole Senate. Meanwhile, Sessions, who unlike some fakers, is really a bigoted pig, can go home and tell his constituents he proudly continues to be a pr*ck.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Thirded. Politicians know they can lie (about substantive issues! Not affairs, of course!) without any downside. So they make up awful-sounding stuff, then they say it.
    -
    This doesn’t inherently favor either side. But it happens that there is zero substance to mainstream conservatism these days, so the zero-fact approach of the media favors that side for the time being. It will change over time.

blog comments powered by Disqus