In the Arena

Iran Sanctions Pass

The United Nations Security Council has passed a new, tougher Iran sanctions regime by a vote of 12-2, with Brazil and Turkey voting against and Lebanon abstaining. This will not create enough pressure to end Iran’s nuclear recalcitrance, but it’s a significant achievement nonetheless. It send a strong message to the Iranian people that the world–even friends like Russia and China–considers their government an international outlaw. That means something; it will have an impact on the growth and depth of the political opposition movement (and may eventually sway some of the crucial bazaaris, whose businesses may be affected by the sanctions, against the Revolutionary Guards’ dictatorship). We’ll see, over time, if Iran responds to diplomatic pressure;  it often has done so in the past.

The no votes by Brazil and Turkey are a matter of concern and sadness. Obviously, those two emerging powers aren’t feeling too pleased that their lame bid at nuclear diplomacy with Iran fell flat. They should be included–indeed, they should be front and center–when Iran is ready to return to the table; indeed, their initiative could be the start of the next round of negotiations. They could be valuable intermediaries between Iran and the rest of the world.

This is not a triumph of diplomacy, but it is a successful diplomatic step taken by the Obama Administration. I wouldn’t be surprised if Iran decides, before long, that this isolation is too costly.

Related Topics: Iran
  • Latest on Swampland

    Mitt Romney’s Sweet Spot: Just Conservative Enough

    Why is Mitt Romney having trouble winning over the conservative Republican base? One reason is his lack of political finesse, an air of dorky rich-guy aloofness that reminds some people of John Kerry. More important, however, is his ideological profile. In almost every important way, Romney’s policy platform is more moderate than those of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum. Gingrich  offers a much more conservative tax plan, along with crowd-pleasing ideas like his plan to sic federal marshals on “radical” liberal judges. Santorum carries a blazing social-conservative torch, championing ideas like a constitutional ban on abortion. Both Gingrich and Santorum talk quite openly about the virtues of bombing Iran. Romney’s temperature runs cooler in all these areas. Not to mention his past record of pro-choice, pro-gay rights positions. As Jon Chait notes today, the GOP establishment is defending Romney but also working hard to push him to the right.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Conflict Over Obama’s Contraception Rule Intensifies

    The Administration’s decision to require Catholic charities and universities to provide free birth control through employee health coverage is several weeks old, but the maelstrom of dissent it’s created is widening. Republicans, who charge that the measure violates such organizations’ religious freedoms, have allied with Catholic groups in opposition, and in recent days a handful of high-profile Democrats have joined their ranks in calling on the Administration to broaden exemptions from the rule.

  • freeinpa

    “The United Nations Security Council has passed a new, tougher Iran sanctions regime by a vote of 12-2, with Brazil and Turkey voting against and Lebanon abstaining”

    Yes, it is the 4th set of sanctions and they really mean it this time. Obama gave them a stern warning and threatened them with ongoing diplomatic measures..

    That sound you hear is the hysterical laughter coming from Iran.

  • danielatlanta

    If nothing else, the response to this Security Council vote for sanctions should tell us who is actually in charge of long-term policy making in Iran.

  • allthingsinaname

    We will see.

  • michaelfury

    “Admiral Cosgriff’s caution was well founded: within a week, the Pentagon acknowledged that it could not positively identify the Iranian boats as the source of the ominous radio transmission, and press reports suggested that it had instead come from a prankster long known for sending fake messages in the region. Nonetheless, Cosgriff’s demeanor angered Cheney, according to the former senior intelligence official. But a lesson was learned in the incident: The public had supported the idea of retaliation, and was even asking why the U.S. didn’t do more. The former official said that, a few weeks later, a meeting took place in the Vice-President’s office. “The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,” he said.”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/some-stunt/

  • pintortwo

    This is not a good thing, Joe Klein.
    .
    I posted the following in another thread:
    .
    (The) imposition of economic sanctions on Iran will have catastrophic humanitarian consequences, while it will even more enrich and empower such critical components of the security and military apparatus as the Pasdaran and the Basij. The two organizations work like a massive corporate conglomerate and have major control over the export-import components of both the official and the unofficial economy.
    .
    It is likely that these sanctions will consolidate power with the very authoritative bodies they intend to weaken and the burden will be felt by common Iranians.
    .
    Perhaps you agree with former Sec State Albright that it is is “worth the price”, as in Iraq:
    .
    Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?
    .
    Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.
    .
    –60 Minutes (5/12/96)
    .
    (…)
    Albright made no attempt to deny the figure given by Stahl–a rough rendering of the preliminary estimate in a 1995 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report that 567,000 Iraqi children under the age of five had died as a result of the sanctions.
    -(link to follow)

    .
    These deaths are one of three reasons why bin Laden declared jihad against the US. Can’t you see that this may radicalize a country that has been peaceful for generations? Is it not clear to you that this can birth a Shiite terrorist group that wants revenge? Regardless of whether you agree, you have to see that you are saying exactly what the neocons want you to say, and you lay the foundation for war with Iran.
    .
    The people of Iran believe it is their right to develop nuclear energy, as granted by mutual treaty. Sanctions will not deter them, nor should it. A multilateral diplomatic solution is possible (see Grand Bargain- Iran’s offer of “full transparency” of their nuclear program). Sanctions lessen the chance for a peaceful resolution.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    “I wouldn’t be surprised if Iran decides, before long, that this isolation is too costly.”
    .
    did you even read the piece you linked to? your comments really seem like wishful thinking after reading that. not to mention the slew of comments from Khomeini over the years that would indicate they are willing to pay nearly ANY cost
    .
    i agree, however, that turkey and brazil voting no might end up being helpful

  • pintortwo
  • porkdumpling

    But the first set of sanctions including China and Russia. Iran isn’t laughing.
    .
    Joe Klein is wrong: this is most certainly a triumph of diplomacy. Not so much with Iran, but with Russia and China. (Kudos to Obama and Hillary.) It is a show of unity among the great powers of the world that nuclear proliferation be met with condemnation and consequences.

  • stmichaeltraveler

    Iran’s Fourth Sanction Passed:
    The objective of USA has been to stop Iran ability to enrich uranium; it is irrelevant that the enrichment is for peaceful use of the nuclear fuels. It is irrelevant that under NPT, Iran has the right to enrich uranium. Our position has been that once Iran is capable to enrich to 5% for nuclear reactor and 20% for production of medical isotopes, then Iran will be another step closer to enriching to 90% required for fabricating a crude nuclear bomb.
    Another concern of ours has been that nuclear fuel is a precious commodity. We would like to keep the production of nuclear fuel entitled to very few nations (nuclear fuel club). We allow other nations, those not the member of the club, to receive and use the fuel. We want the control. Unless they behave to our liking, they shall not have access to it. The facts are that oil is a diminishing quantity. Nuclear fuel will replace oil and coal for production of electric energy. The other sources of electric production (solar and wind) will contribute but will not be able to replace those produced by oil. Coal had had sever effect on our environment; by consensus, its use will be reduced in the future.
    The third issue is nuclear propulsion for ships and submarine. Iran has successfully fielded non-nuclear ships and submarine. They are closer to convert the fossil fuel population to nuclear population. This issue more than the other concerns has created objections by all nuclear bomb abled countries. Israel has, or intends to place nuclear bomb abled submarines in waters near Persian Gulf. Germany produced the nuclear capable submarines for Israel.
    What do Iranians think? Do they feel their backs are against the walls created by USA, Germany, France and now Russia and China? They remember the concerted Russia-England efforts to divide and colonize their country. Who could they trust? No one,Persian Paradox: http://sites.google.com/site/saintmtraveler/persian-paradox

  • http://djtrudeau.wordpress.com djtrudeau

    The effects of this are hard to read without knowing the current mood on the streets of Iran. I think most of us would be guessing when it comes to this question. We had been hearing that a vast number of Iranians favor reconciling with the world, but at the same time want to develop nuclear energy.

    On the positive side, I don’t know if they feel a US invasion is imminent anymore. The window of opportunity was during their domestic unrest, which we sat out. Our passing up an opportunity to stick our nose into their affairs (at least publicly) is a first and I think the effect was good. What I don’t know is how good.

    The only game changer in the Iran situation is the public of Iran and if a collective will can be harnessed to change things there. I don’t think we’re at that tipping point yet. Now that the US has most other countries on board with sanctions, I don’t think our side will change direction anytime soon. The regime in Iran can only be expected to dig in farther. The only wild card on the table is the Iranian public and as I said, we just don’t know enough about their mood as of today.

  • mwamp

    Isn’t this is all based on “assumming” what Iran “might” do “if” they had nukes?
    Do we want to attack another ME country based on assumptions AGAIN?

  • pintortwo

    Nukes are an excuse. They’ve been targeted for “Rogue State Roll-over”. There are many that will not rest until they are annihilated. The US is not threatened, we want that space and a pliant government (ie. sure we’ll trade oil for USD, no prob). Same as Iraq.

  • apr2563

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/remembering-neda.html
    .
    HBO has a special documentary on the Green Revolution and its’ symbol of bravery, Neda.
    The traditional media spent little time covering the event. I followed it closely on the Daily Dish and the Huffington Post. The night time chants from roof tops were remarkable. It was fascinating. I hope we don’t do anything to screw up the Greens.

  • apr2563

    OT: Joe Klein I would hope your watched John Stewart tonight. He acknowledged Helen Thomas’s inappropriate statement. Then he showed the mature press fighting to get her seat. That is now the story. What the traditional media learned was how to play musical chairs.
    .
    Also, have you seen the video of the Rabbi who captured Helen Thomas’s statement mocking hispanics while wearing a roman collar. Should he shunned and disgraced? Please write a horrified comment.
    .
    What did you think of the Wa Times calling her a hag and NY Post calling her a crone. Both in headlines.
    Are you proud Joe? Do you like the company you are keeping? There are nursing homes with lots of elderly people. Why don’t you take your note pad and report on their eccentric and inappropriate comments?

blog comments powered by Disqus