Oil, Tar and Feathers

Washington has entered that wacky hyperbolic season again: OMG! The world is falling! The magic is gone! His credibility is shot! And, it turns out, President Obama’s not even competent!

Yes, the oil spill sucks. And yes, it’s a giant headache not only for Obama (gee, ya think that offshore drilling expansion was tragically timed?) but also for Dems. No one wants to look like they’re dropping the ball, that they’re doing a heckavajob (Brownie), when, in fact, it’s only getting worse. Is this Obama’s Waterloo? Does this make him a one-term President? No one knows the answers to these questions and won’t for years and breathless speculation over it only distracts from the underlying problem.

There’s a buck to stop somewhere in the Interior Department – well over Elizabeth Birnbaum’s head. The Administration had 18 months to figure out that the Minerals Management Service was handing out deep sea oil drilling licenses like candy to kids – only candy comes with more warnings these days (thank you Michelle Obama and Jamie Oliver). Someone somewhere is tracking Ken Salazar’s career at Interior with an egg timer. Environmental groups have been screaming for his scalp since he suggested that BP’s liability might be capped at $10 billion (Credit Suisse today estimated BP’s now on the hook for at least $37 billion). Salazar’s always been a moderate – a bit of a tradition at Interior – but given the climate, moderate’s becoming a dirty word. Even MoveOn.org is turning against the President these days. And is there any doubt that some kind of oil czar — who is not Salazar — is going to have to be appointed to oversee the clean up?

But what I don’t get is why Obama is taking blame for the botched stemming of the spill and for a clean up that under the 1990 Oil Pollution Act, passed in the wake of the Exxon Valdez, makes it clearly the responsibility – nay, jurisdiction – of the company. By hugging the gooey tar close and making it his own, Obama has invited the angry mob to come forth with feathers. Only now, belatedly, is the Administration, in the form of Attorney General Eric Holder, pointing fingers at BP. That should’ve been their mantra the entire time. Clearly, someone took a poll (you have to love the way DC works as polling results usually come in Wednesday nights and therefore big Thursday announcements are often the result of some panicked course correction) and last Thursday Obama went on tv and accepted the blame for, well, everything. Only for the mess of the last 43 days, he isn’t really to blame: BP is. The hyperbolic guys with the feathers, and the President himself, would do well to remember that.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: bp, clean up, deepwater horizon, elizabeth birnbaum, eric holder, ken salazar, responsibility, 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    If every post we make goes into moderation does that mean we are banned?

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    First reaction. I agree that the ‘I take full responsibility’ line seemed like a misstep. It stands in contrast to “I can’t think of anything I regret” but that’s not really saying much.

    Secondly, if you’re surprised that MoveOn disagrees with the President then you need to pay more attention.

  • gysgt213

    JNS-My guess is that if wasn’t this it would be something else. If Obama lets the principles do their jobs then he is too hands off and the media follows the script. If he had gotten all angry and took over from BP the first week, then we would have the angry black guy socialist president looking for excuses to take over private companies. And the media would follow the script. In other words there is no way for him to win. Its a lose lose situation.

  • tstar3

    What I don’t understand is the adminstration said they were conducting a 30 day (On April 30) review of what went wrong, and the 30 days were up when Obama gave the press conference (May 27)? Why is it so easy to be a cynic in D. C these days? Should he have just charged forth without a map, or any sense of direction?

    .
    I understand Maureen Dowd, Peggy Noonan and Dana Milbank have some unresolved “Daddy” issues, but why does the rest of press corps (not you JNS) have to be so clingy and needy? For Chip Reid to badger Gibbs yesterday on the president’s emotion is an embarrassment to the network he represents. I don’t give two scoops of ice cream how the president feels, I care about 1) How are we going to plug the hole and 2) What are we going to do to prevent this from happening again.

    .
    3) Amazing. In less than 2 years the press corps decides that Obama ONLY won the presidency because he was cool and calm during the Wall Street Collapse in September 08, but now during another crisis in June 2010, he is too calm and too coooool. If only we could hold the press corp to the flip flop charge they hold politicians to.

    .
    But how did he FEEEEEEL? Pathetic.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Um….30 days from April 30th would be May 30th…..

  • destor23

    Okay there’s a lot of issues here:

    I was under the understanding that the 1990 act gives the president choices. Ultimately, the company at fault has to pay and if there’s negligence, there are no caps. But the president can choose how to get the company to pay. The government can supervise the clean-up or direct the clean-up. That’s what Robert Reich has been arguing at TPMCafe. If that’s true then it’s perfectly legitimate for people to criticize Obama from the left.

    Speaking of which, why is it so surprising that Obama might lose groups like Moveon from time to time? Moveon is certainly to the left of Obama on many issues?

    As for the politics of it, this clearly makes Obama a one term president. We might as well not even have the midterms or the next 2 years of his term. Just kidding.

    But you’re correct, I think.., Obama tries to “take responsibility” for everything, which is nice but it’s not appropriate in every situation. It’s the job of the President to assign blame when it’s proper too. Ultimately the government is the people and the people can’t expect to clean up every mess caused by a private company. If BP wants to spill oil, it should spill it on Goldman Sachs.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Salazar’s always been a moderate – a bit of a tradition at Interior – but given the climate, moderate’s becoming a dirty word.
    -
    Does “moderate” mean someone who supported the Bush tax policies and invasion of Iraq that bankrupted America? If so, I hope moderate is a dirty word.

  • stuartzechman

    This is a very, very interesting piece, Jay Newton-Small.
    .
    Instead of asking you for the millionth time “Moderate what? Is Salazar a moderate conservative or a moderate liberal? What if he’s neither?,” I’m going to think about the other questions you’ve raised.

  • stuartzechman

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    This is a very, very interesting piece, Jay Newton-Small.
    .
    Instead of asking you for the millionth time “Moderate what? Is Salazar a moderate conservative or a moderate liberal? What if he’s neither?,” I’m going to think about the other questions you’ve raised.

  • stuartzechman

    Why are my comments awaiting moderation?

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    In lieu of what it means for politicians, perhaps more content like this:

    “Many shrimp-boat owners have now been hired by BP to work on the cleanup. One local fisherman, John Wunstell Jr., was rushed to the hospital with respiratory problems that he attributed to the noxious environment.

    He and others claim BP has prohibited the use of masks, and he has filed a request for an injunction to force BP to provide masks and other protective gear to cleanup workers. The response of BP’s Hayward? ‘I’m sure they were genuinely ill, but whether it was anything to do with dispersants and oil, whether it was food poisoning or some other reason for them being ill. … It’s one of the big issues of keeping the army operating. You know, armies march on their stomachs.’

    Blanchard was enraged. Why, he asked, did BP confiscate the clothing of their workers once they donned hospital gowns? He said: ‘I don’t think you need people’s clothes to test for food poisoning. You’d only need people’s clothes to test for chemical poisoning.’

    Blanchard took us out into the Gulf to see the skimming operations. None of the boat owners would talk to us. Blanchard explained, ‘They’re scared to talk, and they’re scared to be seen, because BP has threatened them that if they talk to the media, they’re going to be fired.’

    One fisherman, Glenn Swift, whom we met in Buras, La., confirmed that he signed a contract with a clause stating that speaking to the media was grounds for termination. When I asked him why, then, he was talking to me, he said: ‘I don’t feel it’s the right thing to shut somebody up. We’re supposed to live in the United States, and we’re supposed to have freedom of speech.’

    Amy Goodman

  • southernbell49

    Gee, Jay, I guess the rest of the MSM hasn’t gotten the memo. Haven’t you heard the latest cherished meme? The oil spill is his Katrina. Howie Kurtz said so.

    I’ve seen precious little of the MSM putting this mess in context. Obama inherited many dispirted regulatory agencies, not to mention two wars and the worst economy since the Great Depression. Oh, yes he also has to deal with that pesky Korean situation.

    And yet, most in the MSM are happy not to dig deeper and tell Americans the real timeline of this drilling disaster.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    In lieu of what it means for politicians, perhaps more content like this:

    “Many shrimp-boat owners have now been hired by BP to work on the cleanup. One local fisherman, John Wunstell Jr., was rushed to the hospital with respiratory problems that he attributed to the noxious environment.

    He and others claim BP has prohibited the use of masks, and he has filed a request for an injunction to force BP to provide masks and other protective gear to cleanup workers. The response of BP’s Hayward? ‘I’m sure they were genuinely ill, but whether it was anything to do with dispersants and oil, whether it was food poisoning or some other reason for them being ill. … It’s one of the big issues of keeping the army operating. You know, armies march on their stomachs.’

    Blanchard was enraged. Why, he asked, did BP confiscate the clothing of their workers once they donned hospital gowns? He said: ‘I don’t think you need people’s clothes to test for food poisoning. You’d only need people’s clothes to test for chemical poisoning.’

    Blanchard took us out into the Gulf to see the skimming operations. None of the boat owners would talk to us. Blanchard explained, ‘They’re scared to talk, and they’re scared to be seen, because BP has threatened them that if they talk to the media, they’re going to be fired.’

    One fisherman, Glenn Swift, whom we met in Buras, La., confirmed that he signed a contract with a clause stating that speaking to the media was grounds for termination. When I asked him why, then, he was talking to me, he said: ‘I don’t feel it’s the right thing to shut somebody up. We’re supposed to live in the United States, and we’re supposed to have freedom of speech.’”

    Amy Goodman (tried to link but got put in moderation)

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    In lieu of what it means for politicians, perhaps more content like this:

    “Many shrimp-boat owners have now been hired by BP to work on the cleanup. One local fisherman, John Wunstell Jr., was rushed to the hospital with respiratory problems that he attributed to the noxious environment.

    He and others claim BP has prohibited the use of masks, and he has filed a request for an injunction to force BP to provide masks and other protective gear to cleanup workers. The response of BP’s Hayward? ‘I’m sure they were genuinely ill, but whether it was anything to do with dispersants and oil, whether it was food poisoning or some other reason for them being ill. … It’s one of the big issues of keeping the army operating. You know, armies march on their stomachs.’

    Blanchard was enraged. Why, he asked, did BP confiscate the clothing of their workers once they donned hospital gowns? He said: ‘I don’t think you need people’s clothes to test for food poisoning. You’d only need people’s clothes to test for chemical poisoning.’

    Blanchard took us out into the Gulf to see the skimming operations. None of the boat owners would talk to us. Blanchard explained, ‘They’re scared to talk, and they’re scared to be seen, because BP has threatened them that if they talk to the media, they’re going to be fired.’

    One fisherman, Glenn Swift, whom we met in Buras, La., confirmed that he signed a contract with a clause stating that speaking to the media was grounds for termination. When I asked him why, then, he was talking to me, he said: ‘I don’t feel it’s the right thing to shut somebody up. We’re supposed to live in the United States, and we’re supposed to have freedom of speech.’”

    Amy Goodman (tried to link but got put in moderation)

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    OK, WTF is up with this moderation sh!t?

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Can I comment at all? WTF is up with the mod-lockdown?

  • http://phd9b.wordpress.com phd9b

    First reaction. I agree that the ‘I take full responsibility’ line seemed like a misstep. It stands in contrast to “I can’t think of anything I regret” but that’s not really saying much.

    Secondly, if you’re surprised that MoveOn disagrees with the President then you need to pay more attention.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    OK, last try, what’s up with the moderation?

  • kevin

    Any media outlet that hasn’t given front-page coverage to the unprecedented levels of obstructionism that Senate Republicans gave — scratch that, are still giving — to even the most routine of executive branch appointments does not now get to huff and puff that Obama moved too slowly to put in new people at a relatively low-level operation like MMS.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    My first reaction. I agree that the ‘I take full responsibility’ line seemed like a misstep. It stands in contrast to “I can’t think of anything I regret” but that’s not really saying much.

    Secondly, if you’re surprised that MoveOn disagrees with the President then you need to pay more attention.

    Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/06/02/oil-tar-and-feathers/#ixzz0pjFii7si

  • apr2563

    Judging by the traditional media’s standard, I still would rather have a beer with Obama than George Bush.

  • Ivy_B

    You are absolutely right, kevin.
    .
    James Fallows goes into detail about the obstructionism on appointments.
    .
    http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/05/weakening-america-mitch-mcconnell-shows-how/57441/

  • apr2563

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/02/bps-lobbying-clout-27-for_n_597510.html
    .
    Here is another list of former congressional aides that are working as oil lobbyists. I posted a link to TPM yesterday that is even more depressing.
    .
    I keep reitterating this but the press needs to pay more attention to the bipartisan corruption that has allowed this disaster to happen. Stop listening to the hypocrites and ask how they contributed to the event they are wailing about. Context please.

  • apr2563

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38047.html
    .
    Haliburton giveth and the corrupt taketh.

  • earljr1

    Self righteous democrats scrambling to put a positive spin on inept and inconsistent leadership. It is failing at every level and it has never been more evident that Obama and his henchmen simply do not have a clue on how to fix ANYTHING. This goes well beyond the unmitigated gulf oil disaster. It spills over into every segment of our lives, from uncontrolled spending to outright lies on everything from HCR costs, to issuing non competitive bids. (something Obama promised NEVER to do) His “change you can believe in” was an outright hoax perpetrated on the American public and I don’t care HOW you spin it, it absolutely stinks to high heaven. THIRTEEN TRILLION dollar deficit and growing by over one billion dollars PER DAY! This is simply outrageous. What ever happened to “no spending unless corresponding cuts are made”? Another bald faced lie! One of many and there seems to be no end in sight.

  • rose83

    First question, why am I seeing “Your comment is awaiting moderation” on stuart’s and jcapan’s posts? I get why I would see it for my own, but why is that label not being removed once the comment leaves moderation?
    .
    Second question, is anyone actually confused about Obama’s and BP’s responsibilities? BP created this problem, partly by taking advantage of lax government regulation, and now Obama is responsible for ensuring that the clean-up is well managed, but BP is still responsible for the costs of the clean-up.
    .
    The 1990 act makes BP financially responsible, but it doesn’t make Obama unable to lead the clean-up effort. Which makes sense, because obviously BP does not have an organizational culture that prizes safety. Otherwise this never would have happened. Thus Obama and the federal government should and do have control over the clean-up effort, and with control comes responsibility.
    .
    But even accepting JNS’s apparent argument that BP has complete jurisdiction over this issue, Obama would then inevitably be criticized for not having taken steps to correct this absurd state of affairs. Private companies, particularly ones with an incredibly bad safety record, should not be in charge of disaster management.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I think we have a loose nut behind the controls at wordpress.

  • 53_3

    Why can’t I comment?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Speaking of loose nuts. How ya doin’ Earl?
    .
    I see that you still can’t tell the difference between a geologist and a president.
    .
    Just as, for Katrina, the Army Corps of Engineers failed to repair and upgrade the damn over five presidencies, but, the solution was Sean Penn, an athletic 45 year old with no military training at all, in a boat – but a few thousand would have done the job – one previous president insanely neglected the SEC and MMS but with a problem which there is no vaguely obvious solution to anybody but the most sophisticated geologist can come up with.
    .
    As for lying about health care, we all know that Obama doesn’t cross union picket lines. That’s Sexy (to older men like you) Sarah Palin’s job.
    .
    So, how’s your hopeless stagnation coming? (The opposite of “hope and change”)

  • apr2563

    stuart: I used the word po*p (without the asterik) on this site and was moderated and denied posting. You sure you didn’t slip in some po*p.

  • apr2563

    earljr1: Have you read any of the posts here that show how corrupt both parties are in accepting oil money? Do you have any capacity to see that Republicans might have some responsibility in this tragedy?

  • edinfl

    You are spot on with your comment number 3; it highlights the same mentality that cries for small government and less regulation. As soon as something goes wrong, they want their big government solving the problem, pushing the experts aside and regulating the industry in question so we don’t face the same problem again.

  • earljr1

    april, I am fully cognizant that big oil companies permeate BOTH political parties and this is shameful business. My disappointment with Obama stems from the fact he promised that a vote for him would bring a better, more transparent government. This simply has NOT been the case. I feel that my vote was wasted and this makes me angry and sorely disappointed. I expected better from him.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    I suspect that we may have each been hit with a “ban” for our little debate two days ago. Not sure why, though.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “My disappointment with Obama stems from the fact he promised that a vote for him would bring a better, more transparent government.”
    .
    How has the Obama administration not been transparent, Earl?
    .
    It is true that his HCR, not by his own hand, but by congress got totally and completely altered into Mitt Romney’s. However, he did not promise to become dictator. Since he is not dictator (nobody wants a dictator, except GWB as long as he is the dictator – a great quote of his) he had limited control over what would happen.
    .
    So, citing exclusively the two things he does have control over, please tell us where he lacks transparency.
    .
    Presidents can control two things:
    .
    1) What they initially propose to congress.
    .
    2) Executive orders.
    .
    Please find an example of one or the other where he has been less transparent than glass.

  • earljr1

    Three things noted in my first post, patrick…he swore that he would NEVER have a non competitive bid in his term. Lo and behold, we find AFTER the fact, that he cut a none competitive deal with big pharma, hence escalating the cost of health care. He promised that he would NEVER hire former lobbyists and he has and he also promised to control spending (no new spending without corresponding cuts) and somehow we escalate our deficit by another three trillion dollars and are adding to that at over one billion per day. As transparent as glass, patrick? And in just what world would that be?

blog comments powered by Disqus