Barack Obama Retakes Center Stage. But Can He Stop The Spill?

When it comes to the gulf oil spill, President Obama has been taking criticism from all sides: Democratic strategist James Carville has been shouting into cable news cameras for the president to man up and take control of the situation. The Governor of Louisiana says the White House can to do more. The American people, in opinion polls, are consistently voicing disapproval for Obama’s handling of the crises.

Then there is his daughter, Malia. “When I woke up this morning and I’m shaving, and Malia knocks on my bathroom door and she peeks in her head and she says, ‘Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?’” Obama offered this anecdote at the end of an hour-long press conference in which he repeatedly declared that “I take responsibility” for capping the underwater plume of oil, and minimizing the affect on wildlife. He also fought back against the suggestion that his government had failed to react. “Those who think that we were either slow on our response or lacked urgency don’t know the facts,” he said. “This has been our highest priority since this crisis occurred.”

In the end, Obama described his own government’s efforts so far as frustrating, and he admitted, in part, to their initial futility. If, as he suggested, he has responded effectively but failed to solve the problem, there was no other explanation. “Every day I see this leak continue, I am angry and frustrated as well,” he said. He spoke of birds with oil on their feathers and dying turtles. “I grew up in Hawaii where the ocean is sacred,” he said.

He also, grudgingly, admitted to some mistakes. He said “our efforts fell short” in not initially demanding that footage of the leak be released publically by British Petroleum, which delayed an accurate estimation of the scale of the leak. He also admitted that Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, whose work was praised by the president, had not moved fast enough to bring reforms to the Minerals Management Service. “If they had been happening fast enough, this might have been caught,” he said.

Obama’s intent was to place himself visibly back in the center of the crisis. He discussed in some detail the requirements of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, and the complexities of drilling for oil through a mile of water and three miles of ear four miles beneath sea level. On Friday, he plans to visit the Louisiana coast for a second time, delaying a planned Memorial Day vacation to Chicago.

As a goal, the Obama strategy is politically sound. People want to see a president in charge, one who is candid about his own limitations. But none of it will count for much if the oil leak continues at this pace for another two months, as the incident commander Thad Allen has speculated it might. (Early signs are that the “top kill” effort to cap the leak was proceeding well on Thursday.) People want a president in charge. But a president in charge won’t matter much if his efforts continue to be a failure.

Related Topics: oil spill, Barack Obama, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    James Carville needs to calm down. I am sure the President has heard the cries from Carvilles wizened lips. Sheesh.

    Obama should be Presidential ALL THE TIME. Some of the lapses he has shown make me wonder whether he realizes that he is in charge of the country.

    Obama played into the hands of this political spill bacchanalia.
    It was not his spill “war” and he could have handled it deftly now instead, he has become embroiled in the politics and to all intents and purposes, the spill is now his own.

    To distance himself from this mess, he should have taken a strong leadership position from the start.

    I think among those who should emm… decide to resign are some of his advisers. Those who have directed his response on this matter need to be sent out to some rig somewhere and told to shut up.

    As for Carville and his continued hysteria about Obama’s inaction. He needs to eat some food already to calm his nerves. Obama made some mistakes but he is now rectifying the situation. Carville needs to drink some hot cocoa and take a nap. He is getting increasingly absurd. :)

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/fully-support-gun-ownership-and-pity-women-who-do-not/

  • bobcn1

    “He also, grudgingly, admitted to some mistakes.”

    At least the man acts like an adult. When Bush was asked what mistakes he had made (in a 2004 press conference), his response was:

    “I wish you’d have given me this written question ahead of time so I could plan for it,”

    Followed by: “something will pop into my head,”

    Followed by: “I’m not as quick on my feet as I should be in coming up with one.”

    Bush’s ultimate response to the question was to not admit to any mistakes at all. I have no doubt that some wingers will treat Obama’s statement as an ‘Aha’ moment. The rest of us will respect the honesty of it.

    However… Yes, Obama should have done better.

  • Ivy_B

    I’m sure President McCain would have handled everything better.

  • kevin

    Of course. President McCain would’ve gotten into the White House Deep Sea Submersible and gone down there himself to tell the leak to “stop the bullsh!t.”
    .
    http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/sequel-by-digby-straight-talk-mccain.html
    .
    And seriously “Can He Stop the Spill?” Unless he’s secretly Aquaman, no, no he cannot stop the spill.

  • square1

    Obama’s problem is that Americans have looked at this fiasco and concluded that we should not allow such disasters to occur. If a problem with a well occurs it should be fixed quickly. If it can’t be addressed quickly, then the operation should not be permitted in the first place.

    Obama is catching heat because there is no good answer for the disaster of the past 5+ weeks. Either there was a pre-accident plan to plug such leaks and there has been a woefully bad job of executing the plan or else there is no plan and the operation is inherently unsafe.

    IOW, Obama is forced to either admit that the official policy of his administration is to allow deep-water drilling operations that cannot be conducted safely or he is forced to admit that he let British Petroleum jerk his administration’s chain for weeks on end. There is no alternative that does not reflect poorly on Obama.

    Since I’m putting my money on the former — i.e. that none of these operations have acceptable contingency plans for blowouts — I blame Obama more for allowing other unsafe operations to continue than I do for screwing up the repair operation. What does Obama think would happen if a similar blowout occurred in 9000 feet of water?

    Obama is also taking heat for not properly supervising the oil cleanup. Waiting weeks to put together a team to study the magnitude of the release is incompetent on its face. How can you plan a proper response if you don’t know how much oil has been released or where it is headed?

  • square1

    So what? Many of us regard the prior administration as being the worst in U.S. history. But I consider “being better than Bush” to be an insultingly low bar to set for Obama. Yes, Obama is better than Bush. Wow. Cue the fireworks and the confetti.
    .
    Okay, now that we’ve decided that Obama is not the worst President in history, can we move on to asking simply whether he is doing an adequate job?

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Yes, my 4-sided friend:
    .
    > Bush + > Palin = STFU

  • gloriousglo2

    Hey Scherer, you’re right….Really, he should have made a patriotic appeal to Rush Limbaugh…”Hey Rush, this is the President. I know you hate my guts, but it is time for you to engage your patriotic fervor, ’cause Lord knows we need your help. We are proposing that your rather prominent derriere and oral oriface be lowered to the sea floor over the general vacinity of the wellhead. The pure mass of your being should be enough to do the job. We will deal with the effects of the potential resultant tsunami later, but it’s a risk we’ll have to take”

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    The one thing that Obama could learn from McCain is genuine anger. Of course, Johnny Mac’s frontal lobe looks like it’s going to erupt at any moment, he’s mad for all the wrong reasons, and generally he reminds me of a diapered old fart who wants another bowl of split pea soup. That said, times are, um, pretty farkin sh!tty, people are rightly concerned, and they’d probably like to be able to channel their anger.
    .
    In lieu of being angry at the gov’t or the black-muslim-socialist heading it up, if Obama could properly direct (in lieu of the GOP symphony of misdirection) some of that completely understandable anger towards the folks wrecking the country…

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Correction: See, I typed that stupidly assuming that Obama is deep inside his reelection focused/Rahm-ian/triangulating mind & heart outraged by the lords of finance, health care, big oil et al, like, err, a liberal. Silly f’ing me.

  • Ivy_B

    jc, I got that from listening to his press conference. I don’t think there is anything except maybe harm to his family that would make him scream and carry on as I would to show I’m angry. I don’t think that would make him a good president or a good leader. When I listen to him I am reminded how good it is to have someone who is smart enough to grasp the situation. I tried to imagine Bush answering questions like that today.
    .
    I get that Obama is too centrist, corporatist for liberals. I agree. I was a Hillary person and don’t think she would have been better at this. As much as I despised Rummy, to paraphrase him, we had to go with what we had.
    .
    Until the opposition party wants to help govern – contrast the opposition after the election in Britain – we are not going to attract much better candidates.

  • earljr1

    Obama is finally drawing criticism (and rightly so) for his inept management of the gulf crisis and liberals can hardly stand it. So much teeth gnashing, so much breast beating. How dare they? Doesn’t the media understand that criticism is reserved for George Bush and NEVER their esteemed leader? Own up to it, people, your guy bungled this from the get go and we now have an unparalleled disaster of enormous magnitude. BP called the shots and Obama stood by, helplessly. (other than blaming Bush) No back up plan, no anything, but he’s pretty sure he can run HCR, flawlessly and without cost overruns. (already proven to be a lie)

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Ivy, I don’t know anymore–Hillary’s tenacity and suffer-no-fools’ demeanor may have been more suitable to the times. Given that Obama’s graciousness to the GOP has resulted in zilch… Of course, she’d not have started with nearly as much capital or high approval ratings. Anyway, as you said, it is what it is. As long as going with what you’ve got doesn’t mean that we fail to push him at every opportunity, to be even modestly responsive to liberal demands.
    .
    I disagree, however, that a sane opposition party is a prerequisite for a better/more liberal democratic party. It would help if the GOP were center-right as opposed to “just right” but if you’re correct that means the party rank & file are largely irrelevant to ideological make up of their reps. The only way that is true is if we embrace our irrelevancy, taking what we have as opposed to muscularly reshaping them to our demands.

  • tstar3

    I’m sorry I thought it was British Petroleum that spilled oil into the water and not the EPA. Strange how conservatives wanted capitalism to work its way out when it came to AIG , but the Guvmint must take over for BP. Let’s see the collapse of the entire American economy, Government Bad. The decimation of an entire coast, Government where art thou?

    .

    And for a group of people complaining about wasteful spending, you do know that if the Government had started running the show, taxpayers would be on the hook for it, right? You did har BP say they would only pay “legitimate” claims. Riiiiight.

  • textee

    Time magazine asks (and I’m not lying): “Can [Obama] Stop the Spill?”

    Obama isn’t qualified to run a cheap lemonade stand, and now Time magazine thinks that the moron is qualified to stop an oil leak a mile under the surface of the Gulf of Mexico.

    Lord, please save us from these fools.

  • tstar3

    Literally and Figuratively speaking, you sir, are an idiot.

  • Friar Tuck

    stop an oil leak a mile under the surface of the Gulf of Mexico
    .
    It’s evident that nobody yet knows how to stop an oil leak in deep water.
    .
    The way to avoid the problem is to avoid drilling until you have hardware that can perform its designed function, survive mishaps, and allow for repairs “a mile under the surface of the Gulf of Mexico.
    .
    When you’ve pulled the pin, Mister Hand-Grenade is no longer your friend.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “When you’ve pulled the pin, Mister Hand-Grenade is no longer your friend.”
    .
    Textee, DO TRY THIS AT HOME!

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “How dare they? Doesn’t the media understand that criticism is reserved for George Bush and NEVER their esteemed leader?”
    .
    Wait a second!
    .
    I saw a different version of this earlier from Earl.
    .
    “It was something like How dare they? Doesn’t the media understand that criticism is reserved for Barack Obama and NEVER their sexy Sarah Palin?”
    .
    Obama should have done more to gut and repair MMS after GWB ruined it.
    .
    If it were not for GWB, he wouldn’t have to do anything.
    .
    Next, he didn’t even spill his own coffee much less millions of gallons of oil himself.
    .
    Nobody on the planet earth is sure how to stop this leak.
    .
    That is why MMS should never have approved it.
    .
    Just as the Army Corps of Engineers had ignored the levies under five presidents, MMS was neglected 96 months by one president and, then, 15 months by a second president.
    .
    However, this is not about putting Sean Penn in a boat which Katrina was about.
    .
    This is about BP’s own engineers and other geologists trying to fix a problem that has never been fixed before.

  • gloriousglo2

    yeah, and doesnt it take like 30 seconds for it to go off after that? So you have time to look at it and admire its rather austere beauty for a while…..

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    An oil leak on land, say in Utah, Colorado, ANWAR or a host of other places in the US, could have been stopped within a few hours. Thanks EPA! And thank you liberals, for giving them their power.

  • Friar Tuck

    Brilliant. Let’s drain the Gulf of Mexico! We can all bring our tools and get this thing closed up pronto!
    .
    True comedy writes itself.

  • formerlyrainbow68

    lawyermommy: Are you kidding me? Here in South Louisiana the people are hurting. What you saw as James Carville’s “hysteria” was just his frustration boiling over. After Katrina, I didn’t blame our president, our governor, or the mayor of New Orleans. I now don’t blame the president for our current mess. To some he seems indifferent. To me, the only real villian is BP. Many of our people are just now getting back on solid footing since Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Gustav. To have our seafood industry in such a tenative state is catastrophic both to our state and our individual fisherman and their families. Sorry, but you just don’t get it.

  • gloriousglo2

    Hey rocks, think the 2 sump pumps in my basement might do the trick getting you to terra firma?

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    What you saw as James Carville’s “hysteria” was just his frustration boiling over.

    That may well be true, but I didn’t hear Carville call for anything other than, when you get right down to it, more photo-ops, nothing of substance. And now he’s out braying and bragging about how he got under Obama’s skin.

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    Hillary’s tenacity and suffer-no-fools’ demeanor may have been more suitable to the times
    *
    That assumes there’s something that could be done that isn’t, someone who has answers that aren’t being listened to. I don’t see it. I saw a post at TPM by a petroleum engineer who said the only thing that s/he would have done differently is that “top kill” would have been the first move. The only difference I could imagine would be Carville defending the same actions he’s screeching about now.

  • formerlyrainbow68

    Carville wanted a decision to be made on building the sand berm. He also pointed out that there are no skimmer boats cleaning the oil. The wetlands are our first defense against hurricanes as they slow them down before they come to us. We are on the verge of losing our shrimp, oysters, and crabs. Catastrophic. Some of us are very sensitive after what we thought was inaction and incompetence after Katrina. I still don’t blame any leader from the Katrina aftermath – it was bigger than any of them. Same with this spill. Once again an unprecedented disaster. We are being lied to by BP. These are strong words, but I feel they are justified.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Hey rocks, think the 2 sump pumps in my basement might do the trick getting you to terra firma?”
    .
    Terra Firma?
    .
    Now you know a good ‘Merican like two thirds brain don’t speak no Mexican and don’t need no dictionary, neither. So, don’t get all smarty pants sixth grade on him. He gets real confuses when you do that.

  • Art Pepper

    So we’re all agreed that in the future, the Federal government must strictly regulate offshore drilling?

  • mikew67

    Obama errors in oil spill;

    1) never cleared out industry shills from Bush Regime

    2) OK’d toxic dispersants

    3) No clear & comprehensive green energy conversion plan

    We need a clean break from fossil and nuclear, Barack. And we need an Apollo project to be 100% on biodiesel, solar, wind, hydro and geothermal by 2020.

    Balkingpoints / www

  • formerlyrainbow68

    mikew67: The dispersant is the issue. People working to clean the water today were transported to West Jefferson Hospital. BP suggested it was the heat. formerlyrainbow68 suggests it’s the dispersant. It will be a glorious day when we’re released from the shackles of oil

  • apr2563

    I watched Mary Matlin weeping on CNN this afternoon over the plight of the Gulf. Would someone tell me when she worked for Cheney did she express her concern for the sell out to the oil companies and the undermining of regulations? When Bush was neglecting the Gulf after Katrina was she weeping in despair? Did the weeping Malacon or Landreau, and the so concerned Jindahl fight off shore drilling or show any concern for its regulation prior to the “spill”? Where was Vitter showing his concern about drilling or regulation? Have any of them made any firm statement that the levies are still inadequate? After all, Katrina was also a man made disaster. Where is the concern that New Orleans is still in a state of disrepair from Katrina? Are we asking the state authorities what exactly they are doing? Where was the traditional media in reporting on the undermining and corruption of departments and regulations during the Bush years? Since the drama of Katrina have the followed through to report the still weak levies and the complacency and corruption of the Army Corp of Engineers? Where is our own horror about what our dependence on oil has caused?
    .
    “The evil that men do lives aften them.”

  • sasquatch08

    Firstly, you can’t really decide who is or isn’t the worst President in history while they are still in office, or when they’ve been out of office only two years unless you’re totally biased. Who knows, maybe Obama will go down as the greatest President EVER, then again maybe in 20 years we’ll look back on Bush as the guy who started the process of creating vibrant democracies in the Middle East. No one knows.
    .
    bobcn1:

    You’re willingness to compare a basically prepared “pre-packaged” portion of a news conference (Obama knew mainly what he was going to say and accepting some responsibility for something was an act of contrition he knew he’d have to make going into this today) vs. an inability to answer a spur of the moment question that had almost nothing to do with the topic at hand and was designed to be a trap live on national TV as apples to apples is laughable.
    .
    Personally I walked into that trap when I graduated college, a prospective employer asked me “What would you say are your greatest attributes?” A question I was totally unprepared for having spent from high school until the end of college working in high end restaurants where they looked at my credentials and either hired me or passed immediately. My immediate answers was “Uh… I don’t know what you want me to say.” Which needless to say was the wrong answer.
    .
    This whole mess started under Bush 1 or Clinton, I don’t really remember which with capping the liability of offshore oil explorers to convince them deep water exploration was worth the price and the risk. Even if it was Bush 1 (I want to say it was) Clinton did NOTHING to reverse the caps nor did Obama until this mess reared its ugly head. This is a perfect example of why government intrusion into the private sector should be closely monitored by the public at large rather than allowed closed door meetings. Oil companies were basically told that if you can cover the cost of $1,075,000,000 you can do whatever you want. If the rules were the same as they are of an ON shore company polluting ground water (no cap on that) the companies would have had the financial incentive to say either this type of exploration is TOO risky because the risk of this type of thing was too great for the company to bear OR they would have MADE damn sure their safety systems worked.
    .
    No politician of either party can be truly trusted. The only things they care about is the next election (Specter anyone?) personal reputation in the moment (Massa, Mark Foley), instant gratification and more power. At their core they are all corrupt to one degree or another and the sign of that is their quest for power over other people. Just like a Priest or preacher the MAIN thing they hunger for is control over the lives of others. Democrats want to control business while Republicans want to control what you do with your body or in your bedroom. It’s all just different stripes of the same sick perversion.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    He has taken charge. That is what matters.

    Now he can do the political dance that is known as massive assignment of blame in a clear and incisive manner.

    As an “onlooker” he was not effectively tuned into the resources available to him. Obama did not create the spill. He is not responsible for the mistakes of past administrations which have now caught up with BP.

    However, he moved a little late.
    The great thing is that he can still do what has to be done.

    The issue is not to stop the spill because Obama is not a magician or an engineer. He can only work within realistic parameters.
    The core issue is to make sure the blame game is well played. Sadly, that is all this will amount to at the end of the day.

    Yes, the damage is devastating but all that people will remember is who did what and who was responsible for what.
    It simply comes down to who can position themselves in such a way that they do not end up with huge political liabilities.

    Obama is doing what he should do. He is leading.

    Now let us hope he can move this in the right way, posture and maneuver to put the focus squarely on the CULPRITS.

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/05/25/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • apr2563

    Carville might turn to his weeping wife Mary Matlin and ask her why during all the years she worked for Cheney she didn’t ask him to stop empowering the oil companies and weakening their regulations.

  • pdzxc

    Has anyone called Superman? Or am I the first one to think of that? Not only could he plug that hole in less than a minute, but he could blow all that oil back down into the ground where it came from. Obama and BP need to swallow their pride and give Superman a shot at this. They gave it their best, and that’s all anyone can ask. But let’s face it, enough is enough – it’s time for this to be over so we can gear up for summer. We don’t need this to get in the way of some good shark attacks.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Interesting. Newsweek, on the chopping block, starts practicing journalism?

    http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/26/the-missing-oil-spill-photos.html

  • apr2563

    jcpan: I admire Hillary Clinton. But remember she was a great supporter of the DLC and her husband’s triangulation.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    God damn liberals are stupid!!

  • newfreedomblog

    I think it should be, God, Liberals as so damn STUPID.
    .
    You see this all boils down to issues. Environmental activism has been a huge plank in the Democrat’s platform now for years and years and years.
    .
    But, to have this plank so miserably gutted by this oil spill, they are simply at a loss as to how to revivie it now. Their dear Leader has failed them yet again. He has allowed the pristine coast of Lousianna to become filled with toxic oil sludge. Not because there wasn’t sufficient time to stop it, being it is now 35 days into all of this, it is because of Obama’s negligence and their inability to put blame where it belongs. Right on Obambi’s shoulders.
    .
    What are you afraid of Liberals? Afraid Obamao will crack under the pressure?

  • diecash1

    Their dear Leader has failed them yet again. He has allowed the pristine coast of Lousianna to become filled with toxic oil sludge.

    They really don’t come any dumber than you, rustyblogwhore. When last we checked, didn’t BP own that well? Was it not their operation that failed and polluted the gulf? I realize that you are stupid but this may be worse than your struggles with nouns vs. proper nouns. BP “allowed the pristine coast of Lousianna to become filled with toxic oil sludge”, not Obama. I realize that you are frantically trying to spin this, and any other story that you can, into some sort of scandal that you can blame on Obama but you just can’t seem to find the mark.
    ..
    Why do you hate America rustyblogwhore?

  • merlanai

    First of all, I do believe that Carville called Biden Judas for running as Obama’s VP mate.

    Next, I consider ‘being presidential’ second to being a real leader. Barack Obama is very good at being presidential when he wants to be, but I have a feeling he’s been bit distracted trying to actually do something about the various crisis in our country at the moment. And honestly I’d rather him be able to actually do something about them than have to concentrate on appearances all the time.

  • merlanai

    Please, please PLEASE tell me you’re being sarcastic.

  • http://liuguoxinli.wordpress.com liuguoxinli
blog comments powered by Disqus