Sarah Palin’s “Stalker”

A small, but fascinating debate over journalistic methods was ignited this week after Sarah Palin’s announcement that a leering snooper has moved in next door to her home in Alaska. On her Facebook page Monday, Palin wrote that this “new neighbor” rented a house next to hers and that he’s “overlooking Piper’s bedroom, my little garden, and the family’s swimming hole.”

The “stalker,” as he’s becoming known on pro-Palin blogs, is Joe McGinniss, a well-known author who’s writing a book about the former vice presidential candidate. The “family’s swimming hole” is Lake Lucille.

Dave Weigel, the Washington Post’s chronicler of the Tea Party movement and populist right, thought Palin’s Facebook musings – not McGinniss’s choice of a summer rental – were out of line and wrote a post on his blog blasting her. Under the headline “Sarah Palin’s strange, unprofessional and paranoid grudge,” Weigel wrote:

…what, exactly, is wrong with this?

Politicians don’t have veto power over who gets to write about them, or how they research their stories, as long as they’re within the bounds of the law. It’s incredibly irresponsible for them to sic their fans on journalists they don’t like. And that’s what Palin is doing here — she has already inspired Glenn Beck to accuse McGinniss of “stalking” Palin and issuing a threat to boycott his publisher.

This is really the ultimate example of the way Palin manipulates the press and inverts the relationship between reporters and politicians, turning the former into “stalkers,” and the latter — as long as they’re Republicans or members of her family — into saints whom no one can criticize. No one in the media should reward Palin for this irresponsible and pathetic bullying.

Obviously, this is a free country and anyone has a right to rent any house they want. But, as Ben Smith points out, this shouldn’t prevent Palin from saying she finds it annoying that a journalist has moved in next door, which is the general gist of her Facebook post. Additionally, I find it interesting that Weigel—who has done great work covering the day-to-day goings on in the populist right—seems angry that Palin is “bullying” a journalist who’s writing a book about her.

Isn’t this what a journalist writing a critical book about a subject should expect? To be bullied and boycotted by supporters of the subject? This is not new. What is new is the way Palin chose to react to McGinniss’s move. Rather than hunker down and use back channels and legal threats to stymie McGinniss’s work – as public figures have historically often done in cases like this – she’s using Facebook to bring it all out into the open.

For what it’s worth, here’s Glenn Beck’s take, in which he suggests Todd Palin is showing restraint by not beating up McGinnis. (Click the above link and scroll down for video from Beck’s radio show.)

Weigel says he got more reader feedback on his Palin piece than anything else he’s written for the Washington Post. He felt compelled to post some snippets from his mailbag today.

And Slate’s Jack Shafer has also weighed in, admiring McGinniss’s approach and his stealthy promotional strategy:

I admire his determination to get the story and have no problems, ethically or morally, with him getting as close to his subject as possible—even if his technique seems a little stalkerish.

(snip)

Taking up residence next to Palin doesn’t even approach violating her legal right to privacy. She has no legal right to blind eyes looking at her property from an adjoining property or even from the street. If McGinniss didn’t live next door, he’d be completely within his rights to interview Palin’s neighbors about her. In fact, he’d be remiss if he didn’t grill them about her.

(snip)

It’s called legwork, it’s called immersion journalism, and it doesn’t look pretty. But it should come as a surprise to only naive newspaper readers that every day journalists treat the subjects of investigations the way McGinniss is treating Palin.

I’ll predict that McGinniss’ deck-side observations of the Palin family will not likely turn up much beyond atmosphere for his book. But that’s not the reason he rented the house. It’s his way of skywriting for all of Alaska—and America—to see that he’s on Palin’s case and that he’s very available to sources if they want to share with him. A couple of more stunts like this, and you can expect the Joe McGinniss book to debut in the Times best-seller list.

What do you think, Swamplanders? Is this a publicity stunt by McGinniss or is he fishing for material from over his porch railing?

Related Topics: dave weigel, jack shafer, joe mcginniss, Sarah Palin, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • kevin

    This is just more of that dirty old “gotcha journalism,” which involves asking Palin questions and reporting facts.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Obviously, this is a free country and anyone has a right to rent any house they want.

    .
    Well not exactly. When someone IS stalking someone else, generally that is not only frowned upon, but can be a criminal offense.
    .
    Where do you live Kate? Is the home or apartment next to you available?

  • allthingsinaname

    She uses it to get more “Air Time” and, you gave it to her. It works.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Hey if Graeme Frost was fair game for the right to sic their followers on so is McGinniss.

  • destor23

    I don’t really think you’ll get much on a story subject by living next door but McGinnis is right to relocate to her hometown for the duration so why not one property over? You never know.

    Palin’s childish, passive aggressive Internetting about it is pretty amusing but she’s certainly within her rights, though it’s sad that she has decided to go the route of accusing him of voyeurism not just of herself but of her underage daughters. You probably should have pointed out her tackiness there, KP.

  • gysgt213

    Here’s what I think. Sarah Palin continually says things that are totally inaccurate and or flat out not true. She does this via facebook, twitter and foxnews.
    .
    She will not take any questions what so ever from a reporter like Kate, because that would be giving into the lamestream media and we all know according to Sarah, reporters like Kate lie. About Sarah Palin.
    .
    However, no matter how over the top, insulting and outrageous Sarah Palin’s musings become, there appears to be nothing but reward for her. Reporters like Kate here will run to their own blogs, twitter and facebook pages to pass along the latest BS Sarah had someone ghost write. Now Sarah Plain with no evidence has accused someone of being a peeping tom and Kate wants to know if we think “he is wrong.”
    .

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Two things:
    1) There is a significant difference between legal “rights” and moral “rights”. Moral rights are not enshrined by any law and over the last 50 years, have progressively been more and more ignored or thrown out as more and more people use the legal rights to define boundaries. Sarah Palin, by that note, is no exception. Glenn Beck is unquestionably a violator of moral rights on a daily basis. Note: unlike (particularly though not limited to) social conservatives, I believe moral rights should never, under any circumstances, be made legal rights especially since moral rights are often defined by the individuals involved.
    2) I would consider privacy of one’s personal life to generally be a moral right. However, politicians (more than any other group of “celebrity”) have progressively revoked this moral right – particularly in the last 20 years though it would be fair to argue that it’s been going on for a lot longer – and Sarah Palin is unquestionably an individual that refuses to recognize this moral right as existing.
    .
    As a result, I find myself incredibly conflicted. On the one hand, “live by the sword, die by the sword”. On the other, I continually hope that people will start standing up and saying “I will not continue this degradation of our moral rights”

  • deconstructiva

    No stunt; he’s serious. He’s written many investigative books; his first one, The Selling of the President 1968 covering Nixon campaign, is highly recommended. The Nixon team’s manipulation of the media is highly prescient and Sarah-like. It’s about “time” some reporters stop playing pattycakes with Sarah and really dig into her past (need to read AK and anti-Palin blogs now to find this). I want more journalists to write in-depth books either current or past stories, including current / past swampers (looking at you Kate, Jay, and of course KT).

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    “overlooking Piper’s bedroom

    Using her daughter to suggest perverted, even pedophiliac, intentions on the part of someone she doesn’t like? Exact same thing this sick woman did with David Letterman last year, and exactly what Palin’s howler monkeys are responding to, as Weigel’s mail demonstrates:
    I will find how who you sleep with now, who you used to sleep with, whether your kids are yours (you are a breeder aren’t you, or are you a homo who picks up teenagers?)
    ***
    For what it’s worth, here’s Glenn Beck’s take, in which he suggests Todd Palin is showing restraint by not beating up McGinnis.

    Because he lives next door? Exactly what are special law and special rights of the Royal Family of Jeebusland? Or is Beck simply accepting and perpetuating Palin’s sick grasp at victimhood? which, I repeat, involves exploiting her ten year old daughter to sling mud at someone she doesn’t like. I wonder Mark Shields and his ilk will fall for this one too.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    For what it’s worth, here’s Glenn Beck’s take
    -
    Keep us posted, please! Life imitates satire, yet again.

  • deconstructiva

    …forgot to add: except Halperin. No more from him, please.

  • stuartzechman

    Jay Newton-Small:
    .
    What do you think, Swamplanders? Is this a publicity stunt by McGinniss or is he fishing for material from over his porch railing?
    .
    Whatever the value of McGinniss’ previous work, this is political paparazzi-ism.
    .
    It’s shameful to your profession that you would describe celebrity gossip-hounding as “journalistic methods.”
    .
    The enterprise of journalism –at least that which was enumerated in the Bill of Rights- is concerned with evaluating and disseminating information regarding the truth or falsity of her statements and accurate and complete descriptions of her policy proposals such that Americans can make informed decisions with respect to exactly what the government they’re being tasked to elect will probably do.
    .
    To the extent that renting a house next-door accomplishes those goals, it’s a journalistic method. To the extent that it’s in the service of comparing her statements with respect to whether she likes Miracle Whip on her sandwiches to the actual sandwiches McGinniss can glimpse being made for her in her home, it’s offensive, yellow trash cynically abusing Constitutional protections.
    .
    What do you think this is likely to be, Jay Newton-Small?
    .
    Is it probably the Pentagon Papers or is it more likely to be the Edwards’ family drama?

  • arubyan

    I’m with Jim —

    The phrase “…overlooking Piper’s bedroom…” is the kicker here — Palin is implying that McGinness is (at least) a pedophile.

    And her constituency completely buys into it.

  • kevin

    “Selling of the President” is great. The quotes from Roger Ailes about Nixon alone are worth it.

  • deconstructiva

    Planning to stalk poor Katie, Rusty? And thus contradicting your paragraph about stalking as a crime? What’s your obsession with KP (or Jay or KT or other women journalists)?
    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/04/14/jail-time-for-insurance-evaders-yes-said-fox-news/comment-page-2/#comment-155680
    Sorry Rusty, but when you write crap like that it’s hard to believe anything you write (like that matters, of course).

  • stuartzechman

    I’m such an ass, Kate Pickert, I completely misread your name on the byline because I had another window open to a story by JNS.
    .
    As compensation, I swear I will not repeat your name over and over again in my next comment.
    .
    Please forgive me for this honest error, um, KP.

  • kevin

    Heh. I’d forgotten about that one.

  • deconstructiva

    Fair enough point but Kate Pickert, Tumulty protege and future media starlet, wrote this, not Jay (current media starlet).

  • Paul-no not that one

    SZ-I’m wondering if you are confusing McGinniss with Kitty Kelley.
    .
    I’ll wait for the book.

  • josephp55

    Exactly what I was going to say…

    And what about the reference to the “family’s swimming hole”—meant to imply that someone is leering at the kids in the backyard pool, instead of merely living on a lakefront property that shares the same lake shore as Palin’s property.

  • deconstructiva

    Stuart, we were typing at same time but you were faster. Given that McGinniss practices immersion journalism, what are fair limits for inside info. is a fair discussion. However, given Sarah’s track record on dealing with media and telling the truth, I’ll take McGinniss’ word over Palin’s. For now. (Hell, she can’t even keep her story straight about the Wild Ride / Trig’s birth …and wouldn’t the one thing a mom would remember clearly is her son’s birth? A trivial example, but she has a long record of inconsistencies …okay, lies.)

  • allthingsinaname

    Oh stop with the melodramatics. She make millions off of her exposure, she desires it, and makes the most outlandish statements to get it. The two of them live off each other, they know it, I know it, Kate knows it, and is doing the same thing, feeding off each other.
    .
    In comes stuart, when do you start your own blog, or have you, and I just don’t know it?

  • kevin

    The reader mail Weigel posts is insane, but these tweets from the Palin drones are even weirder:
    .
    http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2010_05_23_archive.html#6709469884243832473

  • deconstructiva

    Stuart, what allthings asked. Do you have a blog in addition to twitter? Or do you only work with those sunday webcasts?

  • nflfoghorn

    I think this became an issue only because Miss Prissy made it one.

  • gysgt213
  • nflfoghorn

    Now if this guy’s name was Joe Francis…. :)

  • Paul-no not that one

    “family’s swimming hole”
    .
    I took that to be more “I’m just a regular gal”.
    .
    Like at the junction, Petticoat Junction.

  • deconstructiva

    FTW! If she had nothing to hide he wouldn’t be there.

  • deconstructiva

    At least she didn’t say “cement pond.” Or do shady biz deals with Mr. Drysdale.

  • charlieromeobravo

    In their defense, I could see how knowing the new neighbor next door (give or take 100 yards) is writing a book about you could be disconcerting for them but I can’t muster any sympathy her here. For starters, have any of you seen pictures of her property on the lake? It’s not a row house community where the neighbors can hear each other sneeze. Based on the pictures I’ve seen, when Palin says he’s overlooking Piper’s bedroom, I can’t see how that could be the literal truth. But that doesn’t ever stop her from saying things like that and getting her followers worked up, does it?

    I think this guy renting the place next door is part publicity stunt, part digging in for some serious research. It’s not like he’s going to point a telescope at her bedroom window or keep logs of who comes and goes at what time of the day.

    She has chosen to be in the public eye and she’s willingly and willfully brought her family along with her. At some point she’s going to have to quit with the theatrics and roll with the consequences of her choices.

  • nflfoghorn

    When’s we gonna eat some vittles?
    .
    (Those of you under 45 don’t have the slightest clue what we’re talking about!)

  • charlieromeobravo

    Heh. Palin hasn’t been in the news lately and she has a habit of creating controversies when things get quiet. If the woman has any talent at all it’s playing to her fans and keeping them hanging on the fake drama’s that she creates around her life.

  • nflfoghorn

    CRB @ 14.2: Was her maiden name Gosselin?

  • lepidusxvi

    See, that’s the brilliance of Palin’s hype machine. She chooses her words wisely (which is ironic given how unwisely she did it during the campaign) so that they are technically totally true, but put the best/worst possible slant on a situation.
    .
    Odds are that her daughter’s room is on that side of the house. Thus, true.
    .
    Note she called Lake freaking Lucille her “family watering hole.” It makes it sound creepy and stalkerish. It really just means they both overlook the same body of water. I mean technically speaking, by that definition you could argue I am stalking anyone on the Eastern Seaboard given we both overlook the Atlantic Ocean ;)

  • bronxxboy

    I am no Palinista– and consider her to be a 3rd class hillbilly hustler– no brains, integrity or ability other than to feather her nest BUT– I disapprove of McGiniss’s tactics. Ths is icky and will and only end badly as it serves to further degrade the media.

  • theartofdiet

    Well, paparazzi stalk camp outside celebrities’ homes all the time. This only proves one thing: Palin is a celebrity now. She can complain all she wants, but the tactic is legal and the readers approve it for juicy news sake.

    http://theartofdiet.com

  • sacredh

    I wonder if Sarah is going to play to this guy every chance she gets. I hope he reports it when she hand washes the family laundry in a washtub (or better yet, when she beats the clothes on rocks down by the lake) and hangs them on a clothesline in the backyard to dry. I don’t think it’s outside the realm of possibility that she stages family style events when she knows he’s there. Sack races, jarts (look out Todd!), horseshoes or anything else that boosts her “just folks” cred.

  • sacredh

    Pass the vittles with the pot passers on the fancy green table. The comparison with the Beverly Hillbillys is crude and unwarranted. Ellie May never got knocked up on the show.

  • dumdedumdum

    Sarah Palin, brought to us by John McCain, who should have his name permanently linked with hers, is one of the worst things to happen in American political life in a very long time. That said, those who regard her as “stupid” in some sense are doing her as big a political favor as did those who relished calling George W Bush “stupid” or variants on that. Palin means to keep her claws in the American body politic for a long time, and she has figured out how to do it, I’m afraid.

  • nflfoghorn

    I know comparing a TV familiy to a real one is ludicrous, but I think with one ratchet from his shotgun ol’ Jed would’ve brought any thought of a young man trying to get to second base with EM (or vice versa) to a screeching halt.

  • toddandincharge

    Palin is responsible for the hate and possible violence against Joe this will inevitably foster.

    Didn’t I just read that Todd is overseeing a massive construction project on the grounds involving thousands and thousands of square footage, yet peeping Joe can apparently peer into a little girl’s windows?

    As usual with Palin, this is complete horsehockey.

  • sacredh

    You’re right. Sarah may not be book smart but she is shrewd. She’s going to be around for a long time. Sarah’s appeal baffles me. My friends that support her are rabid in their devotion. What amazes me is that they claim that I’m dazzled by Obama (I support him but I’m also more than a little disappointed because he isn’t liberal enough) but when I criticize Palin, they act like I called their momma a whore.

  • bronxxboy

    This plays right into Palin’s narrative of martyrdom-by-the-media– and only adds to her appeal to all the morons out there. Fellow Dems– don’t do her any favors by encouraging sleazy tactics to be used against her.

    Be patient– given time she will blow herself up without any help !!!

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks for asking, you guys.
    .
    I do have an on-again off-again blog that Jay Ackroyd and I started in the fall of 2008, and it does have some decent pieces up (Dirks contributed, too), but I’m not a blogger, really.
    .
    I am a commenter, just like you.
    .
    I think that what we do is important for politics and journalism, maybe just as important as blogging, actually. We fulfill a different, crucial function.
    .
    Maybe I will actually put in the time and effort to make my own blog, maybe I won’t.
    .
    I will never stop commenting, though.

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    Sarah Palin, brought to us by John McCain, who should have his name permanently linked with hers

    His most significant contribution to our political landscape. Really his only one. If our political media had any honesty, they’d recoginze that “Sarah Palin” ought to be the first and last words when discussing the bloated mediocrity that is Senator John McCain.

  • textee

    For those uninterested in reading this post, long story short: A leftist political activist (i.e., Kate Pickert) quotes two leftist political activists (i.e., Dave Weigel and Jack Schafer) dutifully defending a deranged, nut job, leftist stalker who must, like David Letterman, fantacize about the rape of Sarah Palin’s 14-year-old daughter at a New York Yankees game. Snooooooooooooozzzze.

  • deconstructiva

    …are YOU one of those uninterested in reading this post? You picked the wrong daughter. Try reading Kate’s stuff next time please.

  • apr2563

    NewRusty: Can you read? If you can you would note that Kate is showing sympathy for poor, paranoid, Palin.

  • apr2563

    She is going to be on Fox tonight. The tough questions will include: “Sarah, how does it feel to have a lamestream, Socialist/Nazi, pedophile journalist living next to you?” Sarah will respond with a rambling nonsense that I can’t possibly parody.
    .
    The chyron will indicate breaking news and state Palin and her children are being threatened.
    .
    The traditional media will still defend Fox News as legitimate.

  • apr2563

    Yes, and it includes a TV studio for the shy, reclusive Sarah who has shielded her children so well from publicity.

  • apr2563

    Another rw cultist who doesn’t read. Textee have someone read KPs post for you so you can understand her point of view.

  • certifiablylazy

    Maybe he’s writing a book about Russia?

  • kevin

    Reading only gets in the way of their pre-programmed talking points.

  • maverick2k9

    Textee, Dave Weigel a leftist??? He is a conservative libertarian.. like you, I suppose.
    .
    Another wingnut debating tactic of shooting first and asking questions later.

  • 3xfire3

    Stuart,
    .
    As usual thanks for the thoughtful post.
    .
    This article and the posts made by many left leaning swampers only illustrate what a vile bunch of hypocrites they are.
    .
    Because they don’t like Palin’s politics their willing to say it’s OK to invade her and her families privacy in a paparazzi way. If this was done to one of the darlings of the Left, especially a woman, they would be up in arms.
    .
    These continued hypocritical action by the leftist commenters only shows why the Left is so disliked in our country. Too many act in these vile ways and Mainstream Americans want nothing to do with them.
    .
    They hurt your Liberal cause tremendously.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I’m reminded of dialogue from an otherwise forgetful film, We Don’t Live Here Anymore. Great cast, horrible film. The writer character tells his mate, a depressed literature prof to “try writing”

    The prof responds: “I have. I’m a reader, not a writer.”

    Blogger vs. commenter? Artist vs. critic?

  • 3xfire3

    Well swampers you did yourselves proud.
    .
    Showing your HATE for the world to see.
    .
    Having no problem with a Paparazzi situation that normal moral people would know was totally wrong. To think it’s OK to invade a woman’s privacy and that of her families is unbelievable.
    .
    Apr I expected more of you but apparently you choose to follow this vile group of haters.
    .
    If a situation like this was happening to a darling of the Left you people would be up in arms. This only shows what a vile group of hypocrites you are.
    .
    You female commenters, who claim to be feminist, only support women who have your political beliefs. The rest you just through under the buss. I hope you’re proud of yourselves.
    .
    Your comments and actions are so vile and hypocritical that Mainstream Americans want nothing to do with your Left wing politics. You people do more to harm the Liberal cause than you will ever imagine.

  • kevin

    Do we need to pull out the fainting couch for you, grandma?
    .
    He bought a house next to hers, in an area where the homes are incredibly far apart. Here’s what her lot looks like:
    .
    http://www.zillow.com/blog/wasilla-alaska-real-estate-and-sarah-palins-house/2008/09/
    .
    It’s huge. He’s not “invading her privacy” by living next door to her. He’s not peeping into her children’s windows or staring at them in their “swimming hole” (which happens to be a massive, public lake).
    .
    Christ, does anyone remember when conservatives weren’t such a bunch of whiny little crybabies? Sack up, for God’s sake. Grow a damn pair.

  • maverick2k9

    wow, what next with the crazy Palin circus? Hounding out the guest “stalkers” at the Best Western hotel next door?

  • kevin

    She’ll probably storm the public, taxpayer-funded beach that stands close to her 253-acre property and demand that the tourists there get out of “my little boy’s sandbox.”

  • wsugvsu

    I don’t understand the quotation marks Kate. As a female, I think of this man as a stalker (its sick and creepy), but maybe you are from Mars and may feel comfortable with someone over looking and over hearing everything you say (along with all the others on here who are making zero sense).

    Let’s attempt to react like human beings shall we and put politics aside for a minute. Sarah Palin, public figure or not, is entitled to the privacy of her own home along with her family. The man did not need to travel all the way to AK and live 15 feet from her home to write a book about her. For example, and I am not comparing individuals, I highly doubt Kitty Kelly was peeping over Oprah’s home as she was writing an unauthorized biography about her. If she did, Oprah would have found a way to either arrest her or make her move out within hours.

    His act crosses the line and it would be nice for women especially to be standing up to these acts of lunacy.

  • kevin

    The man did not need to travel all the way to AK and live 15 feet from her home to write a book about her.
    .
    Once again, please look at the aerial photo of her home.
    .
    http://www.zillow.com/blog/files/2008/09/sarah-palins-house.jpg
    .
    Do you see another house within 15 feet of it? It’s a 2.13 acre lot (typo above) with plenty of open land and trees around it.

  • 3xfire3

    wsugvsu,
    .
    Read my comment 26 above.
    .
    You comments are correct and what any person of decent morals would find as the normal response to this situation.
    .
    You will notice from 90% of the above posts, their are few people, women included, that have any moral values on this blog.
    .
    They are more interested in trying to damage anyone who disagrees with their political views, Morals be dammed.
    .
    People with this level hate for others just because they don’t share their political beliefs are a vile bunch of low life human beings. They have no shame.
    .
    They would find themselves much more comfortable in a nice Socialist dictatorship country where they could govern the rest of us without having to consider the political views of anyone else but themselves.
    .
    Keep your high values but don’t expect to find them on this blog.

  • diecash1

    People with this level hate for others just because they don’t share their political beliefs are a vile bunch of low life human beings. They have no shame.

    Congratulations, you’ve perfectly described yourself and most of the right-wing commenters on this blog — nasty, arrogant, derisive and hateful blowhards that feign indignation.
    ..
    Hypocrite, thy name is 3xfire3.

  • wsugvsu

    Kevin—That’s all you have for me? well thank you for that articulate response…idiot.

    diecash1—”right-wing commentators* on this blog”? Ok. I am seriously in disbelief here and I am just going to leave this site. But before I do, I would like to remind you that this situation has nothing to do with either political party or her administration or her policies. I am an independent and I am perplexed as why politics even relates here (Now, before Kevin jumps in and gives me another dumb response, I will clarify. I know who Palin is, but at the end of the day and at her home and with her family, she’s a private American citizen).

    I would like to think that we are still a civilized nation with common sense and decency…most of the time. The man rented the house so he can watch Palin’s and her family’s every single move. For most, that’s stalking and I don’t know about you, but I kinda of think that why Palin’s upset.

    As Americans, can we see that Palin has point? It’s a such a shame to see how many on here don’t.

    Good night!

  • diecash1

    wsugvsu — Perhaps you’re confused but my comment @ 27.3 was not for you. If you happened to read the comment @ 27.2 and the block quote at the beginning of my post, you would realize that. I was referring to a specific set of r-w trolls that frequent this blog. They frequently spew vitriol and hatred while decrying such behavior by so-called liberals and I find it pathetic.
    ..

    As Americans, can we see that Palin has point?

    What exactly is her point? No one can criticize her or write a book about her? Last I checked, it’s a free society and she is a public figure not above such criticism. While I believe the decision of Joe McGinniss to move next to Palin to be in poor taste, it’s a free country. Palin could have easily purchased or rented that house if she wanted to preserve her privacy.
    ..
    Do you not she the pathetic nature of her complaint? Attempting to hide behind her daughter and smear McGinniss as a pedophile is beyond pathetic and should not be tolerated in a decent society. Where is your outrage over this?

  • wsugvsu

    diecash1—Nope. I am not confused and I know who you were directing your comments at (3xfire3; which I agree with his/her points and you probably would too if you would just remove your political blinds off).

    “Do you not see* the pathetic nature of her complaint”? um, no. I thought that was quite clear from my post. I see it in yours though.

    I “see” a woman and her family who are essentially being harassed by someone who very much sounds like a creep to me. From what I read today, this man has tried to pay up to 60,000 dollars on a bid to just have dinner with her, traveled from MA to Fl to annoy her at a book signing, has made a comment of something along the lines of if she has a sex life, he’ll probably figure out what it is, and now this?

    I probably would have reacted with much less grace and definitely less restraint. Also, my brothers would have been more than happy to “harass” him and have him packing within minutes of moving in.

  • apr2563

    3x: I am a feminist. That does not mean I support every female. Sarah Palin exploited her children during and after the campaign. Cruely, she took her baby, perched on her hip so we could all note he had Down’s Syndrome, and used him as an example of her exceptional motherhood. After all, she didn’t have an abortion.
    She used her daughters pregnancy for the same purpose, dragging her and her boyfriend around as exhibits. I had a teenage daughter. She would have been mortified.
    Sarah has sought publicity and used her children as a draw. Sorry, but she is the hypocrite.

  • apr2563

    The reactionary people on the right here are so upset and protective of Sarah. But they are constantly making moral judgements on anybody who doesn’t agree with them. All liberals are Godless creatures and worship Satan.

  • joyceleeh

    Does no one else see the irony here? Palin accuses McGinnis of invading her privacy – but she took a picture of him standing on his own private deck and posted it to Facebook with her screed of complaint, so that he is now getting hate mail and death threats.

    Again – HE didn’t take and post HER picture, SHE took and posted HIS picture taken on his own private property.

    So tell me again – WHOSE privacy is being invaded? WHO is acting like a deranged stalker? And WHO is endangering the other person?

    Look in the mirror, Sarah.

  • kevin

    Kevin—That’s all you have for me? well thank you for that articulate response…idiot.
    .
    Yes, that’s all I have for you — a satellite image which clearly shows that there is no home within fifteen feet of Palin’s giant compound.
    .
    But hey, who are you going to believe? Your idol Palin, or your own lyin’ eyes?
    .
    I would like to think that we are still a civilized nation with common sense and decency…most of the time.?
    .
    I was polite with you. I asked you to look at the photo, even asking “please,” assuming you might have an open mind and be willing to be persuaded by incontrovertible visual evidence. Instead, you call me an idiot. Nice.

  • kevin

    Very good point.
    .
    But you forget the obvious answer — Sarah Palin can do no wrong.

  • dixiechik

    I think Joe McGinness is one lucky person to find a decent, affordable, short term rental property in Wasilla, AK, a small town of only 10,000 residents. That it happens to be next door to the subject of his next book is an even greater stroke of luck. Given his skill, experience and success in investigative journalism, I trust Mr. McGinness to know his boundaries.

    The reason that public figures use behind the scenes negotiations and legal means to protect their privacy is because to be “private” means to eschew publicity.

    Sarah Palin uses Facebook because she’s a narcissist desperate for attention and approval. Any attention. Any approval. She is indiscriminate.

    Sarah Palin, our Lady of Perpetual Victimhood, and the perpetual victims who are her fans, knows no boundaries. There are no limits to what she will do in her quest for power. There are no limits to what she will say in her need to defend herself from anyone or anything that she perceives is a threat to her fragile self image.

    That alone should give pause to anyone writing about her, much less living next door. She is demented.

    Were I her neighbor, I’d have built a fence a long time ago.

  • stewartiii

    Michelle Malkin: Todd Palin for border czar!
    http://michellemalkin.com/2010/05/27/todd-palin-for-border-czar/

  • wyobear

    McGinniss is a total nut job and needs help. How is his ‘research’ going to be better by living next door? Just an excuse to harrass her. I will never buy a book from Random House again. My book club and other book clubs have vowed the same. Leftist liberals are all a bit strange. If I was Todd, I’d find a reason to put him in his place.

  • lapeache

    If you were Todd, you’d be beating up a little old man. McGinnis is a 70 year old man with an impressive journalistic resume.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    He moved next door to her. That has got to be spooky. It is at best unusual.
    She should keep an eye on him. He is a journalist, yes, but he does not need to go to extremes to get his story.

    This is simply reaaaaaaaaalllly a lot.

    I wonder if he would have done this to a MALE POLITICIAN SUCH AS JOHN MCCAIN. Move into the house next door. Hmmm… makes me wonder.

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/fully-support-gun-ownership-and-pity-women-who-do-not/

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    He moved next door to her. That has got to be spooky. It is at best emm really unusual.
    She should keep an eye on him. He is a journalist, yes, but he does not need to go to extremes to get his story.

    This is simply reaaaaaaaaalllly a lot. Most women especially mothers in such a situation would be concerned.

    I wonder if he would have done this to a MALE POLITICIAN SUCH AS JOHN MCCAIN. Move into the house next door. Hmmm… makes me wonder.

    Anyway, I do not think he will try any funny stuff other than report and dig for stuff. She is a good hunter.

    *Sigh* Women should own guns precisely because sometimes in order to stay safe and feel safe, we need to have protection for ourselves and our families close by.

    Even if this is not a stalker, it sounds like the modus operandii of one.

    If this were a stalker, his intent to do harm can only be stopped by using the same violence (against him) same as such criminals try to unleash on women and innocent children. Sad but true.

    Bottomline, Palin has every reason to be concerned but she should at this time just watch and see what he does and act accordingly if he acts inappropriately.

    Messy messy!

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/fully-support-gun-ownership-and-pity-women-who-do-not/

  • 3xfire3

    Apr,
    .
    Sometimes you Liberals with your hypocracy act the part. .
    .
    Apr what if your perceptions of Sarah Palin are wrong and she is not exploting her children but keeping them close to her because they have a close family unit and that’s what comes natural to her and Todd? .
    .
    Would you still throw her under the bus because you disagree with her political views?
    .
    As a femenist is that not being hypocretical to other women? . Apr you seem like a nice person. I guess that’s why I expected better of you.

  • apr2563

    3x, I am a nice person who dislikes hypocrisy and the exploitation of children.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Think about 3X,
    .
    With the media getting so brazen, there might be a media circus if she were having an affair!
    .
    Hell, they are getting so brazen that they may find out if the POTUS is having an affair!
    .
    Imagine if the opposition made a congressional hearing over Sarah Palin having an affair?
    .
    Well, it would be just like… You Republican SOBs when you tried to break up Bill Clinton’s marriage and break his ties to his daughter by bringing in Monica Lewinski.
    .
    No, then it was the MORAL DUTY of the media and Republicans to find out exactly how big the presidents private areas were, what sex acts he did.
    .
    Get off the moral high horse you pathetic hypocrite!
    .
    You cheered like mad when they told you every inch of Clinton’s most personal life like an exited little schoolgirl and now that Sarah Palin is one hundred to two hundred feet – if not far more – from a reporter, you calling that reporter, for no known reason, a child molester.
    .
    You are two faced, lying hypocrite and know that you are just playing high a mighty since you want to look down your nose at people as you have done since you inherited your father’s company fifty years ago.

blog comments powered by Disqus