In the Arena

Wearing the Uniform With Pride

I thought I was through with my penguin suit for the year after the White House Correspondents Dinner/Time 100 celebrathon–and good riddance!–but I had to put it on again last night to pay tribute to General Chuck Boyd, who received the Eisenhower Medal from Business Executives for National Security. There were some very moving tributes on offer–from David Petraeus, Tom Brokaw and a member of Boyd’s motorcycle gang (the general is an avid speed freak at the age of 74)–and I’d like to add a small one of my own.

Chuck Boyd was, and is, one of my mentors. After September 11, 2001, when I decided it was time for me to learn as much as I could about the military, Chuck was a patient and gracious teacher–and an invaluable point of access to others in the military. He never blew his own horn. He never talked about his past. It was through others that I learned that Chuck had been shot down after 105 missions over Vietnam and served seven years as a prisoner of war there. As Tom Brokaw told it last night, the one vow Chuck made in captivity was to become as good a citizen as he could be. He has certainly done that. He remained in the Air Force after the release and eventually became a full 4-star general. He has served in a variety of valuable roles since, including staff director of the Hart-Rudman report which, in 1999, pretty much predicted the sort of attack that occurred on 9/11, and as president of Business Executives for National Security.

A great many fighter pilots were there last night…and more than a few former P.O.W.s, as well as a blinding assortment of brass, and military personnel of all ranks from all branches of the service. Chuck spoke at the end and, typically, called out those who had described him as a hero, a term he detests. He said that he had merely made an unbreakable commitment to the country when he took the military oath. He described what it was like to go on a bombing run in the era before computer-guided weapons, the precision necessary, from the “top of the pop” as pilots say, down through the dive, until the ordnance was released. He said that during those moments “my ass was Uncle Sam’s.” As if that was all there was to it–no courage, just a commitment to country. Good luck trying to sell that one, general!

Now I opposed that war, especially the wholesale bombing of North Vietnam, and Chuck knows that. But I’ve come to stand in awe of the commitment our military personnel make to risk their lives to protect the rest of us. I’ve also come to detest those politicians who send them casually into battle, without considering the necessity of the mission, the  short- and long-term risks, and without planning out the consequences. That is a burden our military has borne far too often in my lifetime.

There is a sacred brotherhood (and now sisterhood) that exists among those who have put on the uniform and faced live fire. You don’t mess with that, as Richard Blumenthal has done while giving speeches in Connecticut. You don’t do it even once. There is a profound difference between people like Chuck Boyd and the rest of us–people like Richard Blumenthal and me–who allowed others to serve for us. When we attempt to aggrandize ourselves by pretending to be them, we make utter, craven fools of ourselves. But enough of that…

Last night was Chuck Boyd’s. Every word he uttered had the sterling ring of modesty and truth. I’ll always be honored that he took the time to teach me all that he has.

Related Topics: General Chuck Boyd, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Obama to Submit His Budget to Congress on Monday

    President Barack Obama is pressing for investments in infrastructure while relying on familiar tax increases on the wealthy and corporations to claim progress on the federal deficit in his upcoming budget.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Robert F. Bukaty / AP

    With Saturday Victories, Romney Retakes Control of the GOP Narrative

    Mitt Romney, the perpetually questioned front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, had a rough week. Three embarrassing losses to Rick Santorum in Tuesday’s non-binding contests led to questions about Romney’s conservative bona fides just in time for GOP activists, gathering at their annual Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, to collectively grumble about it. But in two narrow, largely symbolic victories on Saturday, Romney reclaimed the headlines. Never mind the details. He was winning again.

  • kathy

    nice tribute. Would just as soon you hadn’t sullied it with mention of Blumenthal, which you could have done in a separate post, but nonetheless, it’s good to read what you had to say.

  • FlownOver

    And to think he could have dumped a disabled spouse, married an heiress and run around the halls of Congress yelling “Me! Me! Me!”

  • afguy

    I’ve also come to detest those politicians who send them casually into battle, without considering the necessity of the mission, the short- and long-term risks, and without planning out the consequences. That is a burden our military has borne far too often in my lifetime.
    .
    The ONLY way I know of to minimize this is to require EVERYONE to serve in some manner that they have to put their own bacon on the line in their lives, so they know what it’s like to serve a greater good beyond just themselves.
    .
    We’ve had a couple of generations in which the hardest decision many have had to make was whether or not to attend college BEFORE or AFTER taking that high-paying job and getting married. (Assuming you or the parentals had the money for you to attend college, that it…)
    .
    National service? Sorry… I now have “other priorities”… but I’m with the rest of you in Iraq and Afghanistan 1000%. See… my ribbon is tied to my mail box and on my car trunk.
    .
    I don’t agree with everything Israel does but Universal Military Service does tend to make their populace very aware of the “human” price of extended wars.

  • stuartzechman

    Well written, Joe Klein.

  • textee

    Joe Klein: “After September 11, 2001, when I decided it was time for me to learn as much as I could about the military, ….”

    Almost nine years on his quest, and Klein still knows nothing about the military. If you gathered all of the militant leftist political activists in the Washington/New York press corps who fancy themselves as possessing expertise on the military but, in fact, know nothing about it (e.g., Katie Couric, Wolf Blitzer, Martha Raddatz, Michael “Charlie Manson” Ware, Dan “Lucy Ramirez” Rather, et al.) you could fill an entire brigade (division?).

  • michaelfury

    “There’s a picture of the World Trade Center hanging up by my bed and I keep one in my Kevlar [flak jacket]. Every time I feel sorry for these people I look at that. I think, ‘They hit us at home and, now, it’s our turn.’ I don’t want to say payback but, you know, it’s pretty much payback.”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/payback/

  • http://www.124monkeys.com Sean DeCoursey forgot his password

    Just, just stop Mike. Stop hurting Swampland.

  • square1

    Business Executive for National Security? Is that for real?

  • square1

    I’ve also come to detest those politicians who send them casually into battle, without considering the necessity of the mission, the short- and long-term risks, and without planning out the consequences.
    .
    Does Joe Klein detest those cheerleader-journalists who fail to hold the politicians accountable? Will he look in a mirror? Exactly when did Klein demand to know what the Bush-Cheney’s plan was for Phase IV before he threw his hat into the invasion ring?
    .
    If it was conventional wisdom among Klein’s colleagues that the Bush-Cheney misrepresentation of the WMD threat was grounds for impeachment, the Democratic leaders of the party could have held the previous administration accountable. Instead, Democrats took impeachment “off the table” because they knew that the GOP would squeal about partisanship and that Klein’s colleagues would have treated such efforts with their typical he said/she said detachment.

  • Joe Klein

    Square–

    Ah, so we go through all that again. First of all, very few people felt that the Bush Administration’s actions with regard to the WMD were grounds for impeachment; certainly, I didn’t. Even the French thought there were WMD. I didn’t even think that Cheney’s torture initiative, loathsome and disgraceful as it was, would be a provable case of criminality in a court of law.

    As for my feelings about the war, I was a freelance writer during much of the run-up. I expressed my skepticism about the war, and my support for Al Gore’s speech opposing military action, on Slate in September 2002. I began work at Time in January 2003 and was cautious at first in my new job, but still expressed deep skepticism about the war in my columns. (As devoted readers know, I did slip once–thinking aloud, stupidly–and expressed on TV the opinion that since the troops were in place, it might be right to go ahead with the invasion. But you will never find an example of expressing that opinion when my brain was in gear–i.e. in print.)

    Ever since, I’ve been pretty clear about what a disaster Iraq was, even to the point of wrongly opposing the surge in 2007. I favored the expansion of the war in Afghanistan, but my patience there is limited–it is informed by my frequent reporting trips to the region–and my support is not unequivocal. My opposition to any pre-emptive military action against Iran is unequivocal and it has gotten me into a running battle with warmongering neoconservatives. You can disagree with my views–and criticize me for the times I”ve been wrong– but I’d argue that I’ve made as serious an effort as anyone to learn about these wars and judge them on their merits or demerits.

  • stuartzechman

    Thank so much for responding to commentary at length, Joe Klein, it is always greatly appreciated.

  • 11charlie

    Of course, if you put together all of the right-wing chickenhawks in the media and blogosphere who treat war like it’s a game, you could fill an entire Army Group.

  • apr2563

    Gosh Joe you are admitting there were times you may have been wrong. How many times? How many corrections have you made? Who is tracking your pundit errors? Do you need to be reviewed for your accuracy and perhaps fired? You would want that for teachers.

  • megatronrises

    Thanks for responding Joe. I enjoy your work – especially when you provide us additional insight like this.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    ok now copy that and just paste it the next 500 times someone like square or apr goes on about how nothing you say about schools/unions/healthcare/taxation/etc matters since you supported the invasion. learning by repetition is the only way for some

  • dollared

    Hi Joe,

    I must say I appreciate your honesty and humility around Iraq, and your engagement with this group of commenters. I would impose on your hospitality one step further: does it start to feel like you are part of the national security state if you are dressing up in a tuxedo and honoring their leaders?

    You’ve been great the last three years. It just worries me that the camaraderie inside the system might just be stronger than the nation’s desperate need to spend less on the military, and to give them less latitude over the legal rights of our citizens. And who will stand up to them and insist on accountability and adherence to the Constitution? Their Thursday night dinner companions?

    I know you are doing your best, and you are only doing what is natural and accepted in Washington. But this dynamic worries me, and I would love to hear your take on how we can have a more accountable government, and journalistic profession.

    Thanks for listening.

blog comments powered by Disqus