Regulatory Reform Passes the Senate, Now What?

The Senate tonight passed a sweeping overhaul of the rules that govern Wall Street with the aim of better protecting Main Street if the markets were ever to meltdown again. The legislation would greatly empower the Federal Reserve Bank to monitor and oversee financial flows in order to predict and prevent a massive pooling of risk – such as hundreds of billions of dollars in credit default swaps based on subprime loans – from ever happening again.

The vote was 59-39 with four Republicans crossing the aisle – Scott Brown, Susan Collins, Chuck Grassley and Olympia Snowe – to vote Yea. Two Democrats voted against the bill, Russ Feingold and Maria Cantwell, on the grounds that it did not go far enough in protecting the consumer. “The bill does not eliminates the risk to our economy posed by ‘too big to fail’ financial firms, nor does it restore the proven safeguards established after the Great Depression, which separated Main Street banks from Wall Street firms and are essential to preventing another meltdown,” Feingold said in a statement after the vote.

House and Senate negotiators must now reconcile differences between the two versions of the bill before final passage. Democratic leaders aim to get final legislation to President Obama to be signed into law by July 4th. The two bills are strikingly similar and until the last two days, leaders had been hoping to avoid a conference and have the House pass the Senate version of the bill. “I am confident that we can have a bill ready for President Obama’s signature very soon,” Frank said in a statement tonight.

But there are three key provisions the White House wants taken out of the bills in conference. One is a provision authored by Blanche Lincoln, Chair of the Agriculture Committee, which would require banks to divest much of their lucrative derivates trading businesses. Regulators across the board have panned this populist step as unfeasible and impractical. But the measure has become the public option of financial reform with progressives rallying to keep it in the final version.

The other two provisions the White House opposes were included in the House version. One sets up a $150 billion fund paid for by new fees on banks that would help pay for the liquidation of financial institutions. A similar $50 billion fund was removed in the Senate bill to smooth over GOP objections that such a fund would only encourage future bailouts. The second provision would exempt auto-dealers from oversight by the newly created consumer protection agency. Republican Senator Sam Brownback offered a similar amendment in the Senate but withdrew it today which also killed an attached amendment by Democratic Senators Jeff Merkley and Carl Levin on the “Volcker Rule.”

Final passage after a brief conference looks all but assured, handing Obama a second big legislative victory this session after health care reform. Democrats believe this issue will be a winner for them at the polls in November. “This debate made each party’s priorities crystal clear: Republicans tried to protect their friends on Wall Street and did everything they could to kill this bill, while Democrats stoop up for the middle class and refused to back down,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in a statement.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: financial regulatory reform, passes, Senate, 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Long day covering this? Hopefully late night pubs or sports bars are open nearby for late night snacks and drinks. I agree with you that issue can be a big winner for D’s this fall. The new “Wall Street” film offers serendipity: keep reminding the public how much the real Wall Street screwed us over.
    .
    I also wonder how much the four R’s who crossed over helped out their RW brethren. I wanted to see a KT-styled Real Filibuster™ but did the R’s realize how disastrous that could’ve been for them? Ergo, why some of them caved in? Jay, did any R’s admit this to you? Thanks for your work covering this and get lots of sleep for upcoming war suppl. bills + whatever’s next.

  • square1

    Republican Senator Sam Brownback offered a similar amendment in the Senate but withdrew it today in exchange for the withdrawal by Democratic Senators Jeff Merkely [sic] and Carl Levin of a “Volcker Rule” amendment.

    JNS either misunderstands the procedure or wrote this poorly.

    The Merkley-Levin Amendment was attached to the Brownback Amendment. When the Brownback amendment was withdrawn, it killed the other amendment. JNS’ sentence reads as if there was a negotiated deal for each side to withdraw an amendment.

  • Art Pepper

    over GOP objections that such a fund would only encourage future bailouts even though it wouldn’t do that.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    You’re right, square1, I phrased it poorly. I’ve rewritten it.
    JNS

  • farstomp

    What about the whole capital requirement thing? Is that still in?

    I mean, seemed like a decent idea being that minimum capital requirements kept traditional insurance companies (excl AIG writing non-regulated contracts) out of trouble during the great recession.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I guess it’s taken me two years to notice, but WTF is the Taiwanese flag doing atop the Swamp WH?

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Ha! Yes, I’m not seeing any stripes.

  • newfreedomblog

    “Regulatory Reform Passes the Senate, Now What?”

    .
    More confusion, more government regulations, more loopholes for people to weasle through in order to scam the system.
    .
    This isn’t about “main street”. This is all about the remaining big players on wall street such as Goldman Sachs and others to continue bilking the average American out of their hard earned money they have invested.
    .
    The real reform needed to occur in our outdated tax system. Cuts in fraud, abuse, and mis-management of our tax dollars. Taking a really close look at the cause of the meltdown for this recession, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Was that done? No. Why, because Obama doesn’t have a clue as to what he should and shouldn’t do. Just as I predicted before he was elected President, he has absolutely no judgment skills, no experience and no background in how to run the most complicated Government and Economy in the world.
    .
    This is yet another example of “fixing” a problem, and they do not have a clue as to how to do it. Just like healthcare has proven thus far to not be the kind of reform they touted before passing the bill into law. Now we will face unknown consequences from a “financial regulatory reform bill” which does not address the real problems of the causes for the most recent meltdown. I predict further deterioriation in the economy. More stock market crashes as was witnessed yesterday, and the potential for complete collaspe of at least the European Union’s economy.

  • billiecat

    Just a quick comment to compliment you, JNS, on the coverage you’ve been doing on the legislative process. Your posts and stories on the nitty gritty of the DC sausage factory have been very illuminating. You also did a great job on Hati. But please, no more stories on Jim DeMented! I have to live in his state and that’s bad enough without reading about him in the national media!

  • 53_3

    It’s better than a boquet of dead fish!
    .
    Maria Cantwell, slap thyself…

  • 53_3

    The odd thing is, and totally off topic, is that sponges attach themselves to each other too!

  • 53_3

    The real Manchurian candidate?

  • http://espanolandino.wordpress.com Mr. Rivera

    Hi there, I just translated this article into Spanish. Any interest in having a look at it?
    dovidrivera@gmail.com

  • http://jrgilb0729.wordpress.com jrgilb0729

    I believe if you look deeper into in to this Bill you will find that the Republicans managed to negotiate the Democrats into a watered down bill that Wall Street will reluctantly accept.

    Like the Credit Card Reform, the Wall Street lawyers are already trying to figure out how to work their way around this Bill.

    Wall Street still owns Washington. They will be forced to bend, but they will not break.

    The top six banks now control over 60% of our GDP. Does that scare anybody?????

  • Ffred

    Hey, I live in AZ! Man up and take your medicine.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    It sure scares me. What happened to breaking up these big banks? And why didn’t Congress just repeal all the repeals to bring back the regulations that had worked for decades??

  • mikepalo852

    Obama has expert economic advisers that help him to make decisions, and your comments that he doesn’t know what he is doing are foolish since you are just a bystander looking from the outside in; not knowing what the big picture is. Your comment about health reform not living up to its reputation is unintelligent too since the Bill has not even taken effect yet.

blog comments powered by Disqus