Specter Exits Stage Left

Arlen Specter has survived a lot of things: a brain tumor, two bouts with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and five squeaker elections for the U.S. Senate. But in an anti-establishment year where the far right hates the moderates and the far left hates the moderates, Specter – whose voting record over the past 30 years is almost perfectly down the center – started off with a handicap. And switching parties probably didn’t help.

If Specter had merely said, ‘I didn’t leave the Republican Party, the Party left me,’ he might have been better off. Instead he ran on his seniority, and how he was better positioned than his primary challenger, Rep. Joe Sestak, to help Pennsylvania, an argument undercut by has lack of seniority: Democrats stripped him of it when he flipped, treating him like a lowly freshman. Sure, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden abondoned him in the final weeks, but Specter also started out bitter, remarking that he didn’t want Republican primary voters to pass the final judgment on his 30-year career. Instead, it ended up being Democratic primary voters.

The atmosphere started out grim at the Philadelphia Sheraton, where Specter was holding his “Primary Night Event” (when I called and asked his campaign where the “victory party,” as most politicians call it whether they expect to win or not, was the receptionist was quick to correct me) and it only got grimmer. Specter earlier in the day had shed an uncharacteristic tear when casting his vote. Clearly restless, he came down from his room around six for a surprise chat with reporters. When asked if this was the toughest race of his career he quipped that all six of his elections have been the toughest of his career. He came back down 90 minutes later for a quick walk through with his wife.

I consider it a hint when politicians don’t put up big screens showing the returns. Hillary Clinton had no televisions in the room the night she lost the Democratic nomination (but didn’t concede). Politicians that expect to win like the crowd to cheer the returns as they come in. Specter had one modest flat screen tv, strategically located at the back of the room next to the bar, as if one needed a stiff drink to stomach the results.

On the other hand, it could have just been that Specter’s from another generation of politician. The crowd was mostly older — many of them had known him since law school. His music selection ranged from the 50’s to the 70’s but stuck mostly to Frank Sinatra and Mel Torme. One unfortunate choice, just before the race was called: He Had High Hopes.

Specter entered the Senate 30 years ago with high hopes and he’s achieved a lot in that time. “He’s done more for the state in his 30 years as a senator than any person in commonwealth history with the possible exception of Ben Franklin,” Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell told reporters just as polls were closing. Specter’s seat on the Appropriations Committee ensured that the Keystone State received more than its share of earmarks and federal projects. But Specter truly made his mark in the Judiciary Committee. As with everything, his record was mixed. More than any other senator he was responsible in 1987 for bringing down Reagan’s conservative nominee to the Supreme Court, Robert Bork. But it was his borderline-viscous grilling of Anita Hill during Clarence Thomas’s confirmation to the court that earned him the opposition of feminist groups and nearly cost him his reelection in 1992 (he eked out a 49%-46% victory).

Specter was a thorn in President George W. Bush’s side, demanding (and then retracting) that the President not appoint any Supreme Court nominees that would overturn Roe V. Wade (Specter was pro-choice). Specter voted against his party on labor issues such as the minimum wage, overtime regulations and he long flirted with the Employee Free Choice Act. He championed habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees, grew to oppose the Iraq War and moved to bolster the FISA courts during the warantless wiretapping scandal. And yet Bush championed Specter during his last reelection in 2004 where he barely beat Rep. Pat Toomey 51%-49% in the primary. (Toomey now is the GOP nominee for Specter’s seat and will face off with Sestak in November.)

Specter has been in less of a position to similarly harass Obama, but he did vocally oppose Obama’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner. He also voted against the president’s 2010 budget and to block the release of the second half of the TARP funds.

A Yale-trained lawyer on the Warren Commission investigating Kennedy’s death, Specter helped develop the single bullet theory. His long tenure on the Judiciary Committee also made him an expert in a wide range of legal affairs. And though he often championed lawyers — opposing a $250,000 limit on pain and suffering in medical malpractice lawsuits – as chairman of the committee he spent much of 2005 trying to put together a $140 billion trust fund for asbestos victims that would end all litigation – an effort that ultimately failed in the Senate by one vote.

Specter was mostly known for his sharp intellect and prosecutorial manner – in other words he wasn’t often warm and fuzzy. But he did have a quick wit. I remember at the end of an asbestos mark up one day the committee was trying to schedule the next hearing. A date was proposed that Specter, who was undergoing chemotherapy at the time, shot down because he had a doctor’s appointment. Senator Tom Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican who was also a doctor and had more than 80 amendments pending to the bill, offered to personally check Specter over in order to expedite matters. “I’ll let you look at me if you agree to withdraw half your amendments,” Specter quipped. “You drive a hard bargain,” Coburn replied.

Specter’s independent nature has often gotten him into trouble both with his party and at the polls. But he’d always been able to overcome adversity through hard work and his smarts. But, perhaps his fatal move was to negotiate and vote for Obama’s stimulus package. “I believe my duty is to follow my conscience and vote what I think is in the best interest of the country. And the political risks will have to abide,” he said at the time. Unfortunately for him, they did not abide. Toomey had already thrown his hat in the ring for the governor’s mansion before the stimulus vote; afterward, he decided to challenge Specter again. The chairman of the Pennsylvania Republican Party warned Specter not to come to a Republican State Committee meeting because he’d get booed or people would walk out. Too late, Specter found that the middle was quicksand and even switching parties was not enough to save him.

Tonight, Specter had no words about his accomplishments or the issues that were important to him. He seemed to be holding back tears and sniffled a couple of times as he thanked a long list of those who’d helped him, including his family who shared the stage with him. The speech was less than five minutes long. And then, his arm around his wife, the 80-year-old quietly left the room to chants of “Arlen!” The man who wrote a book entitled Never Give In: Battling Cancer – and Politicians – in the Senate had just lost his last political fight.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: alren specter, democratic primary, Pennsylvania, Senate, 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Joe Biden, Republican Party, Senate, State Governments, Supreme Court, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Yeah, and by Morning Joe Obviously, Obama could have or should have saved Arlen from his own arrogance. He made it clear that he switched partied because he thought it would give hi a better chance to win and voters decided they wanted better. Of course, rather than acknowledge Arlen’s verbal miscalculation they want to say Obama abandoned him. Do they really think that black voters in Philly are so devoid of intellect that that statement didn’t piss the off? Obama wouldn’t dare disrespect his base by insisting that the vote for Specter under those circumstances. Obama kept his side of the deal. He endorsed Arlen, he cut ads for him, he raised money for him and that’s all he was owed. Obama certainly didn’t owe Specter the respect of his base.

  • Cliff

    So I just got an email from Moveon saying that Halter won the primary over Lincoln.
    .
    If true, then allow me to be the first to advise her not to let the door hit her ass on the way out.
    .
    Same goes for Specter.
    .
    Maybe they can form a support group.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Not what I just read at CNN:

    Runoff to come in Arkansas
    Posted: May 18th, 2010 11:20 PM ET
    (CNN) – CNN projects that Arkansas’ Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate will go to a runoff.

    With 50 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday, Sen. Blanche Lincoln led Lt. Gov. Bill Halter 43.6 percent to 42.2. percent. Businessman D.C. Morrison had 14.2 percent.

    To avoid a runoff, a candidate would need at least one vote more than 50 percent.

  • Cliff

    Huh. Well it looks like Moveon jumped the gun there a little bit.

  • apr2563

    Not being a great Sestak fan, I am still relieved to see Spector exit. Sestak, I am afraid, will be a New Democrat clone but he probably can beat Toomey.
    .
    Alan Spector was not middle of the road. During the Bush years he would make a big deal about his outrage and then back Bush. He is like Lieberman. It is all about their egos and survival.
    .
    My lord, at 80, give it up and retire quietly.
    .
    At 69, I consider myself still rather intelligent. But the old synapses let me down once in awhile. There is a time to sit back and enjoy. There are lots of ways to contribute that don’t involve stroking your own ego.

  • apr2563

    Classy people those teabaggers.
    http://www.wcpo.com/news/local/story/Campaign-Manager-Rand-Paul-Refused-Graysons-Call/4ySo1O6X002sD-bHqhyNyQ.cspx
    Rand refuses concession call from Grayson.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Lack of etiquette doesn’t concern me that much. But seeing crap like (click) this…

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    And might I just add that I cannot see Sestak’s name, not a single damned time, without muttering Sleestak to myself.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Nice catch apr2563.
    .
    If that Paul story is accurate-blow off rather than unavailable-it’s pretty shortsighted of him. (Shortsighted by the ophthalmologist-classic!)

    I’m very curious to see how the Tea Baggers contempt for the establishment republicans plays out in November.
    .
    Paul, Rubio, and Emmer in Minnesota are three that I am thinking may be biting off their proverbial noses.

  • centfan

    I think the next step for ol’ Rand is being fitted for Ross Perot’s tin foil. I have no doubt he’ll make it all the way to Congress and Kentucky voters will have a guy who sits in his office missing votes and writing manifestos to the cricket on his windowsill… or that will be the practical result.
    -
    NPR was covering (in the way they do) an Obama financial speech in Ohio. They came across a guy that wasn’t a particular fan of Obama because oil rigs weren’t being built all over the place. Seems this guy works for a company that makes oil rig pipe. So pollution, oil spills, global warming, fossil fuel dependence, and eventual economic energy chaos meant nothing to this guy. He wanted pipe jobs and he wanted them now.
    -
    That’s the all-for-me reality ol’ Rand might actually see in Washington and all over the US after the meds kick in.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I know nothing about Sestak and can not say that I believe he is going to be great or not.

    I am glad that our party is no longer going with all split-the-baby, third way candidates.

    The Clinton years and the majority of Democratic members of congress the past thirty years have been this lukewarm third way types.

    To me, thinking about my own line of work, it would be like, instead of one Realtor representing the tenant and one representing the landlord like having one person representing both interests and the other representing only the landlord. That is, the third way has been about taking all of the hopes and dreams of progressives, cutting them in half and then presenting it to Republicans marching in lockstep who water it down to nothing. This is usually followed by third way Democrats patting themselves on the back for getting one quarter of what they wanted and Republicans with steam coming out of their ears furious that their Republican representatives were in the same room as a Democrat.

    Specter was a third way man all of his life. He just changed from being a third way candidate with an R to a being a third way candidate with a D after his name.

    At least we will no longer be the party of the lukewarm anymore.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Jcapan,
    .
    You, also, found a great catch.
    .
    It reminds me of who we are really dealing with on today’s right: the militia nuts who were just slightly more peaceful than Timothy McVeigh.

  • michaelfury

    “Specter helped develop the single bullet theory”

    And why is that significant, Ms. Newton-Small?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/11/17/head-sh0t/

  • newfreedomblog

    “I am glad that our party is no longer going with all split-the-baby, third way candidates.”

    .
    Yes I too am hopeful that more Sleestak’s types are put up in the primaries for the Democrat / ultra Lib-wits’ side.
    .
    But, you fail to have noticed this year in particular is ANTI-INCUMBENT. Anti-incumbents represented by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama. No more Washington as usual.
    .
    Do you think the large numbers of Democrats who voted for Specter, more moderate and conservative Dems will rally behind Sleestaks’ Cap and Trade? For Universal Healthcare expansion? For more stimulus bills? For more bank bailouts and GM buyouts? Amnesty for Illegals?
    .
    As much as everyone claims the Republicans are moving farther and farther to the right, the Democrats are pushing their base to move farther and farther to the left. But, ask yourself, where does the vast majority of the voters in America place themselves? Center/Right.
    .
    Fiscal conservativism, a smaller Federal Government, preserving individual rights, and a balanced budget is what resonates with voters now. We have tried your experiment with Barack Obama’s policies, and what has it gotten us? More spending, more bailouts, more deficits, a jobless recovery, and a looming bankrupt country.
    .
    You should be more honest and truthful with yourself. Take off your liberal tinted rose colored glasses. Let the truth from the light of day shine into your eyes.

  • square1

    Clearly this is good news…for John McCain.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Completely OT but I just read that Judith “I was proved f*cking right” Miller showed up as a political commenter.
    .
    On Fox, naturally.

  • gysgt213

    There is going to be an all out of effort by the media and pundits on cable to build narratives out of last nights results. Mostly wrong. Not all wrong but mostly. And it will be painful and endless. Last night’s elections has their heads spinning.
    .
    We have the anti-incumbent narrative out of PA which is mostly wrong and a lot more complicated than that. And they will try to apply it to AR too. We have the dems are less enthusiastic narrative which after last night is mostly wrong. We have the dems will lose big in the mid term elections narrative which is apparently mostly wrong too. We also have what the tea party is doing to the republican party is the same happening with the democrats narrative which is also, wrong.

  • southernbell49

    What was interesting to me about Paul’s win was that BOTH Dems in the KY primary got more votes than he did.

    If there was a swell of Tea Bagger support in KY, shouldn’t Mr Paul garnered the most overall votes? And yet in a conservative state he still didn’t get the support the Dems did the primary. Looks like in this state it’s the Dems who are more fired up, even if the Tea Bagger story is more beloved by the MSM.

  • stuartzechman

    Extraordinarily well said, patricksartor.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Not all wrong but mostly…..
    .
    I’m still waiting for you to mention the part that isn’t wrong………

  • tjoyce994

    I’m glad some one finally made this point.

  • nibblybits

    Lack of etiquette absolutely matters. First, because we are all grown-ups living in society, and basic manners and congeniality allows us all to get along. Second, the last thing we need in Congress is a bunch of peevish children who insult each other needlessly. There are bigger issues at stake than personal animus and petty grievances. Rand Paul better grow up.

  • newfreedomblog

    -The two main contenders in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate each got more votes than Paul did in the GOP race. Fun fact, but … registered Democrats in the state outnumber Republicans by nearly 600,000.

    .
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/behind-the-numbers/2010/05/rand_paul_tops_ron_paul_in_ken.html?wprss=behind-the-numbers
    .
    The basic fact is that Kentucky has a closed primary system. No crossover voting during a primary. Couple this with the fact that Rand Paul ran as a Republican. How many of those conservative / Tea Party voters on the Democrat side will move over to the Rand column for the November election. I do believe you shall see many do so, but I guess we’ll have to wait for the polling to start.

  • southernbell49

    I’m not convinced Dems are going over to Paul’s side. He’s not a native son and definitely comes off as arrogant. I don’t see his win as a big Tea Party victory.

  • nibblybits

    It’s bad enough that some of these politicians won’t gracefully retire when they hit 80, 90, but what’s worse is that the reason they won’t is that they’ve been in DC for 20, 30, 40 years and know nothing else. Being in Congress was never meant to be a lifetime job. And these guys get a little too comfortable with the power and the perks.
    .
    Specter didn’t want to leave because he didn’t anywhere else to go. While his service is appreciated, there’s also something pathetic about his clinging to his position so fiercely. Shouldn’t other people from the state, with other experiences, other views being able to represent the people? We as a country should get this anti-incumbent feeling more often.
    .
    That said, not a fan of Sestak. He sounds like a sociopath.

  • freeinpa

    Yes Arlen it’s great to see you go. Let’s not forget though that good old Arlen was a Democrat before he became a Republican (RINO) before he became a Democrat.

    A professional politician with only his interests at heart. He will be the first of many to go.

    PS to Blance Lincoln: Caught your tirade about outsiders pouring money into your race. Please remind the mailman to bring the big truck to carry all the checks from outsiders you are going to return.

  • Ike Jakson

    It was to be expected and it will happen again because it is a worldwide phenomenon:

    http://ikejakson.wordpress.com/2010/04/20/uk-and-usa-voter-revenge/

  • omorka

    Oh, what a relief! I thought it was just me.

  • destor23

    When a guy jumps parties specifically because he thinks the most important thing in the world is for him to remain in a position of power he doesn’t deserve such a kind epitaph. We should really be shaming people like this, not praising them.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “But, ask yourself, where does the vast majority of the voters in America place themselves? Center/Right.”
    .
    As of 1984, 26 years ago, the word “liberal” began to be used as an insult.
    .
    So, people are reluctant to use it.
    .
    On an issue by issue breakdown, the American people are significantly more liberal than even this administration.

  • Ivy_B

    Definitely not just you. I can’t put my finger on exactly why I have this bad feeling about him, but…

  • apr2563

    jcpan: Those pictures are truely disturbing. It is naive of me to wish the traditional media would spend some time investigating who are really financially supporting the “grassroots” tea baggers (Armey, Norquist, Fox) and the affiliations with militias and neo-nazi groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center has all the information but the “journalists” ignore it. The truth doesn’t fit their narrative of an angry, independent electorate rising up to take on the establishment. No mention of how they are sadly manipulated.
    I wish they had spent some time covering the real grassroots movement that represented the anti-Iraq war movement.

  • apr2563

    I think he will follow in the grand tradition of Spector.
    Faux outrage followed by what is good for him politically.

  • apr2563

    Paul she is a regular commentator on the Fox Republican Network. She really must have po’d the establishment media, if they haven’t found a way to rehabilitate her. She has found her true home.

  • apr2563

    gunny: They were wrong leading up to the election and now have to promote those theories going forward. After all, they can’t be wrong.
    Watching Howard Fineman last night was proof of that.
    They all avoided mentioning the vaunted enthusiasm gap not manifesting itself. That has been one of there main talking points for months.

  • apr2563

    NewRusty: The supremely motivated teabaggers were to lazy to change their registration to support their hero? What does that say about their enthusiasm?
    Millions changed their registration to vote for Obama. Millions registered who had never voted before.
    Save the Acorn bs.

blog comments powered by Disqus