Michelle Obama Meets A Young Face Of Illegal Immigration

Updated below with Department of Homeland Security Response

Michelle Obama joined Mexico’s first lady, Margarita Zavala, at a school in suburban Washington DC today, where everyone ran around, bounced balls and talked about sports. But during the Q&A that followed, a second grade student asked a question that was more piercing than anything that happened in the official Rose Garden press conference with the presidents of Mexico and the U.S.

STUDENT: Mrs. Obama, I have a question.

OBAMA: What’s your question?

STUDENT: I have a question. My mom said — my mom said that — I think that she says that Barack Obama is taking everybody away that doesn’t have papers.

OBAMA: Yeah, well, that’s something that we have to work on, right, to make sure that people can be here with the right kind of papers, right? That’s exactly right.

STUDENT: But my mom doesn’t have…

(CROSSTALK)

OBAMA: Yeah, well, we have to work on that. We have to fix that, and that everybody has got to work together in Congress to make sure that that happens. That’s right.

As I wrote in January, the Obama Administration has actually significantly stepped up the enforcement of immigration laws at major employers across the country, leading many people like the young girls mother, without papers, to lose their jobs.

In November, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) announced 1,000 new audits of employers suspected of employing illegal immigrants. This followed a July announcement of audits of 654 companies, which included reviews of more than 85,000 employee records and the discovery of more than 14,000 suspect documents. As a result of the crackdown, thousands of undocumented workers were fired from their jobs.”On the enforcement side, we are really stepping up our efforts to audit employers, to investigate employers for knowing violations, to fine them and to prosecute them when appropriate,” says John Morton, Obama’s choice as director of ICE. “We are doing it on a much larger scale than it was done before.”

According to government records, 1,897 workplace enforcement cases were initiated from April 30 to Nov. 19 of 2009, compared with 605 cases during the same period a year earlier under the Bush Administration. In Los Angeles, the designer-clothing company American Apparel fired about 1,800 employees in September following an ICE audit of employee records. In Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minn., the contract company ABM fired about 1,200 unionized janitors after a similar investigation.

That said, the Obama Administration has stopped the Bush Administration practice of workplace raids, which led to situations where parents faced deportations even though their children were U.S. citizens.

UPDATE: Matt Chandler, the Department of Homeland Security’s Deputy Press Secretary, put out this statement on the second grader’s question: “ICE is a federal law enforcement agency that focuses on smart, effective immigration enforcement that prioritizes criminal aliens who pose a threat to our communities. Our investigations are based on solid law enforcement work and not classroom Q and As.”

Related Topics: flotus, Immigration, michelle obama, Barack Obama, Immigration
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    This story is cute when considered from the perspective of a child – but the problem is that many adults have the same idea about government. I know these people. I live in rural NW Missouri and the people around here don’t know the difference between the School Board and the Governor. ……

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2010/04/12/personal-experience-with-tea-bag-mentality/

  • http://www.stevebeste.com Steve Beste

    What’s the over/under on Glenn Beck demanding that the girl’s parents be deported and criticizing Secret Service for not detaining the second grader on the spot?

  • nflfoghorn

    I think that’s the problem, O Gr8 1. Nobody wants to step up and make a decision that will affect somebody’s electability.

  • nflfoghorn

    Put my $ on 5:00:17 pm EDT :)

  • groenhagen2

    I hope no one is gullible enough to believe that this exchange occurred without being planned beforehand.

  • grape_crush

    Well, then, you’d have to show some proof that it was preplanned, Hoss…No way am I gullible enough to believe you.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Yeah, what are the odds that a citizen child of an undocumented worker would be at a DC school?
    .

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I wonder if any of the supporters of Arizona’s new legislation care to comment on the proposed US Virgin Islands Constitution.

    http://stthomassource.com/content/news/local-news/2009/06/12/governor-says-no-draft-constitution

    It has all the proper elements. Creation of two separate classes of citizens, second-class staus to those not born within the territory and significant popular support. The only downside is the class of people discriminated against are native born American’s. What’s not to love.

  • formerlyjames

    I am sympathetic to the plight of Mexican immigrants, legal and otherwise, and further believe that talk of “immigration reform” is ill defined.
    .
    But the cynic in me will not allow me to believe that is not a set up, canned, not a spontaneous occurrence. Yet, being sympathetic, my kinder side says, just let it go.

  • groenhagen2

    Not sure about the odds, but this was not a DC school. It’s in Maryland.

  • groenhagen2

    grape:

    The corrupt Obamas have used children as plants before. They used one at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire last August.

  • groenhagen2

    “American’s (sic)”? Apparently, English is not your first language.

  • chupkar

    Oh puh-lease.

  • formerlyjames

    Funny that my comment at #6 is in line with your comment, but…you lost me at “corrupt Obamas”. Any corruption in that family is in keeping with common political practice, and pales in comparison to the Bush family. Try to remember whatever manners your momma might have taught you.

  • anon76

    What is it that you don’t understand about “Prove what you’re saying is true”? Following up a questionable assertion with a similarly questionable anecdote does not constitute proof.

  • deconstructiva

    Ask the Palins about using children as plants.

  • dcalifornian

    Why, exactly, conspiracy-theorists, would the White House plant a question that accuses their own guy of rounding up and deporting people? A question that the first lady would do her best to cut off, lest the girl’s mother get deported by vigilante teabaggers…explain the logic behind that one.

  • dcalifornian

    Right… Because what the White House wants is a Q&A session with the First Lady to end with a child inadvertently outting her mother as undocumented. That would sure make for great press for the White House.

  • gysgt213

    You do know that DC is so next to Maryland you can’t tell the def.

  • http://calonord.wordpress.com calonord

    lol for those who think that this is funny that a CHILD is traumitized by there families immigration status, is just plane ignorant and unamerican, just put yourself in her shoes your familes about to be deported and your going to have ICE busting down your door handcuffing the little girl and her parents be put back in mexico in the middle of a drug war, hmm lets see if she’ll survive. And i know people are going to say well they should of done things legally, but what if they did, what if they did follow the rules, pay there taxes and nerver commited a crime and actually contributed to society and were still denied citizenship. I agree that we do need to secure our borders but or immigration system is COMPLETLY BROKEN. I mean come on we just had a terrost who was legalized as a afghan citizen, your gonna tell me that our immigration system is fine, there’s so many families and CHILDREN out there have done everything right but are still denied citizenship. And btw even if this was staged this little girl has done NOTHING wrong give her a path to citizenship, just kick the people out how have criminal records secure the border so this doesn’t happen again and STOP hiring illegal immigrants your hypocrites thats why there coming in, and make comprehensive reform that doesn’t reward the wicked like mr afghan that tried to kill people in New York

  • jeriv

    You do realize you’re asking for logic from people who have none, don’t you?
    .
    I believe their thought process goes something like this:
    .
    1) DISBELIEF/FEAR – Something happened that doesn’t fit well with my narrative / world view.
    2) DENIAL – I don’t like it, so obviously, there must be something wrong with it.
    3) SELF-DELUSION – It isn’t what it seems. It’s all a lie. I’m obviously right, so they’re wrong.
    4) BLISS!
    .
    It works out pretty well for any Tea Party platform item!
    .
    BIRTHERS:
    1) Obama was elected!
    2) That can’t be right… he can’t be my President!
    3) He’s not! He was born in Kenya!
    4) BLISS!
    .
    DIPLOMACY:
    1) Obama’s talking to other countries and getting along with them!
    2) That can’t be right. Talking can’t work. Only by threatening them with nukes and being arrogant ***** can we keep them all in line…
    3) It’s not working! It’s actually all a plot to create a “one world government” and “get rid of the dollar!”
    4) BLISS!

  • koabd

    It’s cynicism. That doesn’t require logic, just pessimissm and scorn (which you’ll find plenty of among the regulars here in the Swamp).

  • textee

    Why is Obama’s illegal alien/welfare queen/fugitive from justice aunt still in my country?

  • deconstructiva

    She lives with you in Galt’s Gulch?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    But little girl, your Daddy and Mommy broke federal law by entering the USA illegally. That makes them criminals. But we promise to fix it as long as you can convince mommy and daddy to vote for Mr. B. Hussein come 2012. And you’ll get free healthcare too. Oh wait, you already do.

  • jbk123

    Wow, if you ever wanted to see the ugly face of the Republican party, just read some of the comments on this post. (Not for nothing, right-wingers tend to be physically repugnant, not just morally bankrupt and ethically lacking. Seriously ugly people.)

  • apr2563

    formerly, I watched the video. There was nothing prepared about this meeting. In fact, Mrs. Obama appeared a little uncomfortable with the question. The answer was awkward.
    Plus, I have taught kids that age. No way the little girl was going to be someone they would want to rely on for a scripted question.
    People had too many years of Bush stacked forums.

  • apr2563

    jbk123: they just keep getting more and more ugly. That is why they will not have success in November. The majority of the voters will not accept their meaness and lack of kindness.

  • abdullah69

    Ask the Palins about using their children as substitutes for plants.

  • apr2563

    Proof please. And, my lord how can you people live with your fear and paranoia?

  • apr2563

    Just to allow you to be as nasty as possible textee.

  • xxception

    Judging by some of the comments here, some of you people seem to believe that a child of a bank robber should be able to keep money that was stolen during the robbery. After all, the child didn’t rob the bank, shouldn’t they get to keep any of that money their parent gave them? I don’t know if punishing the child for the sins of the parents is the right thing to do. I do, however, have a big problem with letting the child reap the rewards of her parents conscience, illegal decisions.

    For the commentor that asked what if they did everything correctly and still were denied citizenship, who gets to decide who is allowed to become citizens in any country in the world? You seem to believe merely the desire to be a citizen is enough whether the host country decides you are wanted or not. That is flat out ridiculous. Do you let anyone that wants to sleep in your house do so regardless of what kind of person they are?

  • billiecat

    You’re right – we should deport anyone who does not have one-hundred-percent native-born ancestry!
    .
    By the way, xx, the Lenape indians called. They want Manhattan back.

  • billiecat

    Judging by some of the comments here, some of you people seem to believe that a child of a bank robber should be able to keep money that was stolen during the robbery. After all, the child didn’t rob the bank, shouldn’t they get to keep any of that money their parent gave them? I don’t know if punishing the child for the sins of the parents is the right thing to do. I do, however, have a big problem with letting the child reap the rewards of her parents conscience, illegal decisions.
    .
    Hey, let’s try kicking this up a notch, xx!

    Judging by some of the comments here, some of you people seem to believe that a child of a murderer should be able to keep the life they got when their parent avoided execution. After all, the child didn’t kill anyone, shouldn’t they get to keep the life their parent gave them? I don’t know if punishing the child for the sins of the parents is the right thing to do. I do, however, have a big problem with letting the child reap the rewards of her parents conscience[sic], illegal decisions.
    .
    Abort for the children of murderers! It’s the only fair thing to do!

  • xxception

    Way to distort what I said billie to try and make yourself look smug and superior. As for your analogy, the child of the murderer HAD their life regardless of the crime. The child in this story had NO residency UNTIL her parent broke the law. As for the Indian comment, where do you want to stop it? Do we return every land on earth to the first people to step foot on it? If so, tell Mexico they need to hand it over.
    Looking back over your response, you are either logically challenged or purposely distorting to try and make your point. Either way, you fail miserably.

  • xxception

    You can always count on the “the _____ indians want _____ back” whenever this topic comes up. Let’s return ALL land on the face of the earth to the first people to set foot on them, right? Who gets to decide when history began and the first people set foot on a parcel of land? This is an argument that only gets used with the USA. Mexico was NOT originally inhabited by the people we refer to as Mexicans now. All Hispanics of South America are descended from the Spanish, so should they return that land to the natives? It’s a never-ending argument meant as one of those “gotcha” moments Libs “claim” to hate.

  • billiecat

    As for your analogy, the child of the murderer HAD their life regardless of the crime. The child in this story had NO residency UNTIL her parent broke the law.
    .
    My analogy is perfectly apt, xx. Individuals who are born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and individuals born in certain territories or outlying possessions of the United States are citizens at birth. Therefore, a child born in the U.S. to an illegal immigrant is a U.S. citizen, and their citizen status was, by your account a “reward” for their parent’s illegal act. Therefore, a child born to a murderer after escaping the gallows is alive as a “reward” for the parent’s illegal escape from justice. It’s your logic, xx, I’m just following it to it’s rather messy conclusion.

  • billiecat

    It’s a never-ending argument meant as one of those “gotcha” moments Libs “claim” to hate.
    .
    I agree it’s an absurd concept, but again, I’m only following your ideas to their logical conclusion. And as much as I hate “gotcha” moments, I hate poor critical thinking skills and illogic more.

  • billiecat

    Oh, and I am smug and superior, I wasn’t trying to just look smug and superior.

  • xxception

    You have totally misunderstood what has been said if you thing your are following my logic. You have leapt to many conclusions, i.e. that the child in this story was born in the US. You have distorted an example to try and make it look like it doesnt’ apply. You did not follow my idea regarding your “indians and their land” comments. You grabbed that from out of the sky. Don’t attempt to blame the fallacies of your arguments on me. You are using the typical Lib tactics of grossly exaggerating and misrepresenting any argument you can’t counter.

  • billiecat

    And you are following the typical reactionary tactic of denying your statements mean what they say when called out on their ugly side.

  • xxception

    ROFL@billiecat. But the evil Repubs are the elitist, right? Hypocritical, much?

  • xxception

    Uhhh, no. I am denying that my statements are the gross missrepresentations that you are claiming to be my statements. Either that or you have trouble understanding the written word. Show me where I said anything about being “native-born” to be a citizen.

  • billiecat

    I really don’t have a problem with elitism, as long as the person acting elite really is elite. There’s nothing wrong with being educated and intelligent. It’s the phony “regular guys” ginning up votes by slamming “pointy-headed perfessors” that get stuck in my craw.

  • billiecat

    Uhh, than you really need to work on your communication skills. Because I merely took what you wrote and drew it on to the ugly conclusion of its logic. If not citizenship, what “rewards” were you suggesting this child is getting?

  • omgamike

    Illegal is illegal. Period. That is the basic premise we must start with. It matters not that her parents broke no other laws. They knew what they were doing when they crossed over from Mexico. As soon as they crossed that border, they broke the law. And as sorry a case as the little girl must be, she is also here illegally. The whole family should be picked up and deported. That is the law. No shades of gray, just black and white.

    Secure the borders, clamp down on employing illegals. The result will be that the mass majority of illegals will self deport, without any assistance from ICE. The rest should be easy to round up.

blog comments powered by Disqus