Holding Regulatory Reform to Help Lincoln?

For more than a week, I’ve been wondering why Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd and that committee’s top Republican Ricahrd Shelby haven’t introduced their managers’ amendment, the final piece that will allow financial regulatory reform to pass the Senate. The bill was scheduled to be finished, after all, at the end of last week. And Senate Majority Leader has seemed surprisingly sanguine about missing that deadline – no threats to go all weekend, no laments about GOP obstructionism. And then Friday, a House source who is working on the bill, explained it to me: they’re waiting for Blanche Lincoln’s primary on Tuesday.

The Dodd/Shelby agreement is widely expected to strip out Lincoln’s most controversial piece on derivatives: a provision that would bar banks from trading derivatives and would require them to divest their current holdings. Dems are afraid that if that piece gets taken out before Lincoln’s primary it’ll weaken her chances, which is why they were forced to vote down Saxby Chambliss’s amendment last week seeking to strip out that exact language (though someone might want to clue in Wall Street, the Dow keeps tanking every time traders thing this bill’s going south). Lincoln needs the populist street cred since progressive groups like Moveon.org and Fire Dog Lake, as well as the unions, are spending millions to bolster her primary challenger, Lt. Gov. Bill Halter (an odd investment for unions in Arkansas, a fairly un-organized state – hello, Walmart). Lincoln looks to win the primary – at least she’s leading in polls – but if she fails to win outright, I wonder if Reid will hold regulatory reform till after her run off?

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: 2012 Election, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Art Pepper

    So as I remarked in an earlier thread, the Dems accidentally let a tough provision into a bill that is meant to pretend to regulate Wall Street, and now they can’t figure out how to remove it.

    God I love my party! /snark

  • Cliff

    Wait, so the Dems hate Lincoln’s derivatives regulation, but they can’t strip it out until they get the rubes back in line to vote for Lincoln?
    .
    Lincoln needs the populist street cred which will be immediately betrayed upon her reelection, but those dastardly progressives are trying to gum everything up.
    .
    This is infuriating.
    .
    What’s also infuriating is that there is apparently nothing that will cause the press to stop taking these people at their word.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Off-topic, I know…But, seriously, wtf?
    ~
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/opinion/16dowd.html?src=me&ref=homepage
    ~
    Maureen Dowd….That about sums it up.

  • apr2563

    Jay, If you took a moment to read the threads on your audio comments on the Lincoln primary you might learn why unions, Firedoglake, and Move On oppose Lincoln and not be so surprised.
    .
    If I was Halter, I would let the voters know the sham that is taking place with Lincoln, Dems, and Reps.
    I would broadcast it far and wide.

  • Art Pepper

    Yes, I have to wonder why progressives would back Lincoln’s challenger, considering that Lincoln has so much progressive street cred!

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “”One side beats me up for doing it, and the other side beats me up for not doing enough of it,” she says. In Arkansas, which is neither red nor blue, that doesn’t have to be a problem, though.”

    Yes, it’s called politics and, if it is worth caring about, then you get your a$$ kicked one way or another. You have to decided issue by issue what YOU truly believe is best for the country and for your individual constituents, have a backbone and stand by it.

    I have the most respect for elected officials who seek out the issue, bring it into their campaign, run on the issue and vote just like they say they will even if 48% of the people hate them.

    Unfortunately that has been what the Republicans did when I was a part of the 48% who wanted to duck like I was in the car with mentally ill person who shouldn’t have a driver’s license.

    In the meantime, beginning with Clinton, Democrats have been out there taking surveys to ask us once again what is the most popular (even if misinformed) opinion of the day and split the baby between the two sides.

    When I see every time that when there is a tough issue that they run back and find a survey to see what is most popular and ask us, after THEY have studied the issue for months or years what is best is, “Wait, I just sent you to Washington because I trusted your judgment. If you have to run back to ask us again if we still agree with you every time you blow your nose, what do you do for a living besides getting your picture taken? It sure isn’t about having a spine or making good decisions.”

    That is how our country went so far to the right. We have one party in lockstep always voting together and the other party taking half of their own ideas and watering down to something lukewarm. Merge one part right wing and one part lukewarm neither-liberal nor conservative and you have conservative.

    I love her amendment, but, she needs back surgery and a dermatologist: she needs to get a spine and thick skin.

    Why do I have this feeling I just morphed into Stuart Zechman?

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    You could be Stuart Zechman. Zechman is a criminal mastermind, with myriad internet identities, who preys on susceptible individuals worldwide. Just ask lawyermommy. She has the goods.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I never knew about Ani DiFranco.
    .
    Then again, I know one of her songs from 1998.
    .
    No, Apr, it does not matter at all. I still like her song Goldfish. Men have fantasies about bi-girls like Ani, so, if anything, that might be bonus points.

  • Cliff

    Oh my good lord, that made JNS’ slobbery makeout session with British politicians in the previous post look like serious journalism.

  • Cliff

    You need more block quotes and also to call journalists by their full names all the time.
    .
    Calling regular commenters by a former version of their screen names (ie Rustydog, neorationalist, oregonjc) is a good touch, too.

  • apr2563

    Patrick, I am shocked. Men have fantasies about bi and lesbian women?!! If only many of them could be as tolerant of the varieties of male sexuality without feeling threatened.

  • apr2563

    Off topic but does have to do with regulation and oversight. Some rough language but expert testimony from a professional and the handling of the oil spill. You will learn something, I promise.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/5/11/865387/-Fishgrease:-DKos-Booming-School
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/5/14/866284/-Fishgrease:-DKos-Booming-School-II
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/5/16/866867/-Fishgrease:-Pivotal-Discoveries-Are-Booming

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    It’s almost as if the democratic party big-whigs favor the blue/corporate-lap/dog incumbent over the genuine liberal candidate in the race? This is shocking.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    I actually feel sorry for Biden. Wonder how many Dowd groupies will think he really wrote that?

  • destor23

    I’m surprised there’s not more outrage about this… isn’t it basically an attempt to trick the Arkansas primary voters by offering them legislation the party has no intention of passing?

  • Ivy_B

    Clever, exiled. I got it.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    And people wonder how the party of demagogues is kept on life support, right? I mean, if we had a viable liberal party espousing liberal principle and striving to enact liberal policy, the GOP would be wandering in the wilds for a generation.
    .
    Meanwhile, we do sh!t like this, repeatedly. And it’s so thinly veiled that virtually no one fails to recognize it. 30 years of Reaganism and this is the tonic?

  • anon76

    Unfortunately I don’t think that Halter is particularly more liberal, in spite of MoveOn et al’s pumping him up. He’s just different than Blanche, who has been decidedly disappointing.

  • apr2563
  • kevin

    Jesus Christ, that’s stupid and childish, even by Dowd’s low low standards.

  • apr2563

    At least for a while Halter would need to recognize those who supported him before the corporate special interests take over.
    Until we have election finance reform with no loopholes not much will change.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Just another confirmation that the Left is not welcome in the Democrat Party.

  • gysgt213

    This OT too. But Creg Craig walked into a Glensaw.
    .

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    “Unfortunately I don’t think that Halter is particularly more liberal, in spite of MoveOn et al’s pumping him up. He’s just different than Blanche, who has been decidedly disappointing.”
    .
    Hey I’m not saying Halter = Kucinich, but your use of “more liberal” or “different” when juxtaposing Halter & Lincoln is a bit rich. She’s not in any way/shape/or form a liberal. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is spending 600 g’s to keep their conservative senator in place, protecting their interests. As was the case with Ned Lamont, this is a precious opportunity to reject one asinine notion:
    .
    “For years, conservative Democrats have justified splitting with the party faithful as a matter of survival; it’s better to have a Democrat in office than a Republican, the argument went, even if the Democrat sometimes votes with the GOP”
    .
    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/04/01/bill_halter_and_blanche_lincoln

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    That was a thing of beauty Gunny. Just watched about an hour ago.
    .
    But your link might be off:
    .

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Ivy~
    I’m just trying to protect the Swamp from the felonious intentions of that marauding criminal, that Stuart Zechman and his web of deceit. We must be vigilant! Haha!

  • gysgt213

    Thanks Jcapan. My link was screwed. Just like Craig’s arugment in support of Kagan. “Well she is a progressive just like Obama.” HA

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Seeing a village blowhard spouting platitudes being rightly humiliated for the vacuousness of his comments. Priceless!

  • Cliff

    Nice.
    .
    I love that Craig obviously wasn’t expecting to be asked for evidence supporting his statements.

  • gysgt213

    You know I forgot the part about her teaching classes too. And she wrote some articles. None of which address any of the questions Glenn asked about though.

  • kevin

    Beautiful.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “it’s better to have a Democrat in office than a Republican, the argument went, even if the Democrat sometimes votes with the GOP”
    .
    That’s accurate. Committee break downs alone.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Craig sounded like Bush when Bush would nominate a SCJ.
    .
    Recite the resume but have zero understanding of the candidate.
    .

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Greenwald must be some sort of radical extremist, demanding facts like that.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Yeah, “teaching classes”! Snort. Somehow I was reminded of that grand line, ‘I know fo-po b/c, hell, I can see Russia from my front-yard.’
    .
    The great thing about GG’s critique is that he’s willing to make it no matter which party occupies the WH. Kagan’s coming hypocrisy (i.e. refusal to answer any meaningful queries despite past condemnation of such practice) would be no more/less revolting during a GOP admin.
    .
    His concerns should reflect the larger population’s. This is ultimately another dose of roids to an already increasingly muscular executive. Not only should we trust them in carrying out their typical duties, a form of twisted nanny-state dependency, but we should give them a pass to nominate whatever blank slate they like b/c, as W. said of Putin:
    .
    “I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straight forward and trustworthy and we had a very good dialogue…. I was able to get a sense of his soul.”

  • stuartzechman

    Dowd is a pathologically disturbed individual.
    .
    That this depraved individual is in the position of editorializing about the politics of the most powerful democracy in the world is indicative of our decline.

  • stuartzechman

    Why do I have this feeling I just morphed into Stuart Zechman?
    .
    You’d need to become eleventy-thousand more times as pedantic and redundant in order to even begin to resemble the felonious Proust-summarizer Zechman.

  • stuartzechman

    Wow.
    .
    That’s impressive.
    .
    I don’t mean impressive of Greenwald, I mean of Tapper’s producers, for letting that argument –which is a microcosm of the current Kagan debate between the center and the left– be aired.
    .
    It has been a very, very long time since a competent voice from the left was allowed to be heard in the national political press corps.

  • stuartzechman

    Gunny:
    .
    “Well she is a progressive just like Obama.” HA
    .
    The thing is, she might be a “progressive just like Obama,” if we take them to mean their Orwellian definition of the word “progressive.”
    .
    John Podesta is the CEO of Center for American Progress (CAP), a centrist think tank.
    .
    He writes books like 2008′s “The Power of Progress: How America’s Progressives Can (Once Again) Save Our Economy, Our Climate, and Our Country.” He was Clinton’s Chief of Staff.
    .
    Here he is speaking at Oxford University in 2006 ( link to PDF of Podesta’s speech at Oxford, England, MARCH 4, 2006 ), and defining what he means by the word “Progressive:”

    …both countries [Great Britain and the US] evidently made a decision to invade Iraq based on faith, rather than a plan.
    .
    And in the 1990s, we shared a common governing principle, which I would like to turn to now.
    .
    Beginning in the early 1990s, I had the opportunity to watch two gifted political leaders on opposite sides of the Atlantic complete the modernization of their political parties through a program they called the Third Way.
    .
    In my own country, Bill Clinton assumed the leadership of a progressive movement that many thought had run its course…
    .
    My organization, the Center for American Progress, is leading the effort in the United States of America to again modernize the machinery of progressivism.
    .
    Half the battle is won.

    These people are in the custom of using deliberately misleading language about who they are when in front of a national audience. They used to do this in the 1990′s out of fear of accusations of being liberals by the right. but more and more they’ve found it useful as a means of creating the false impression in low-information Americans that they’re some kind of “center-left pragmatist” or “moderate liberal” –just like a huge portion of the electorate. They’re not liberals, of course, they’re something else entirely.
    .
    So when this guy says she’s a “progressive just like Obama,” he’s probably (of course we can’t know with any certainty, which is Greenwald’s important point) technically correct. Of course, that also means that she probably doesn’t share a majority of the values of the liberal base of the Democratic party, even though she doesn’t share the values of the popular right, either. He doesn’t want us to know that, though, he just wants to pull an Obama, and let us assume that we know things about her that we don’t.
    .
    If she’s a “Progressive” like Obama –or Hillary Clinton, or John Podesta, or Rahm Emanuel– then she doesn’t share the values of most everyone in the country, apart from a small group of political-media establishment elites who, for good reason, find it much easier going politically to use double-speak to describe themselves and their unpopular ideas when before the American people.

  • anon76

    Didn’t mean to imply that I thought Lincoln was in any way liberal, just mostly remembering back to a 538 post that made me very meh about this race. I’m all for punishing folks who insured that the public option (forget single payer) never made it into law, just a bit depressing to think about the long odds of Halter prevailing in the general as well as the fact that he might vote the same way as Lincoln 95% of the time. I do hope he wins, for what that’s worth.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Thanks for the 538 link. One of his commenters had a pretty good response. I can’t speak to the attack on Silver, as I don’t read him regularly enough–setting that aside, this about sums up my view:
    .
    “More and more, Nate Silver is becoming emblematic of everything that is wrong with Democratic party today. The tired old strategy of triangulation which has led so many people to see the party as gutless and unprincipled is alive and well in Silver’s defeatist analysis, which neglects:
    .
    1) the effect that such a challenge will have on the Democratic base, 2) the effect that such a challenge will have on other sitting Democratic senators in terms of reading the mood of the base of the party, 3) giving people a sense that the Democratic party offers a clear, decisive difference from the Republican party.
    .
    Triangulation tends to be a penny wise, pound foolish strategy, at least for today’s Democratic party. It’s borne of the same thinking that had the DNC, until recently, donate only give money to close races. It can work in the short run, but in the long run it dampens the enthusiasm of the base, and worse still, tarnishes the brand of your party, leaving people with the justified notion that the Democratic party is, again, cowardly and unprincipled.
    .
    Do I think Halter will win? Like Silver says, almost certainly not. But people need to see that win or lose, primary challenges like this are upside propositions in the long run.”

  • shepherdwong

    This is why real liberals don’t get air, it screws up the whole agreement between “conservatives” and centrists about what is liberal/progressive – i.e., people might actually learn something about liberalism. I wonder if the producers decided they has nothing left to lose and wondered if that discussion might actually be interesting to more people, like when Maddow is on MTP.
    .
    BTW, JNS, progressives have know about this Lincoln/derivatives provision Kabuki for weeks. It perfectly encapsulates why liberals hate her and all the lying and screwing of the public interest that so defines her and her fellow corporatist, “centrist” Democrats.

blog comments powered by Disqus