The Oil Spill Blame Game

A theme emerged early in the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing into the BP oil spill. For today’s grilling, lawmakers summoned Lamar McKay, president and chairman of BP America, which holds the lease on the Deepwater Horizon rig; Steve Newman, CEO of drilling company Transocean, which owns it; and Tim Probert of Halliburton, a subcontractor charged with encasing the well pipe in cement. Each of them supplied some version of the same message: we’re not sure what caused the tragedy, but it’s the other guy’s fault.

BP has come is under heavy fire for the April 20 explosion that killed 11 people and could ultimately gush more oil than the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster. After touting the company’s response and its cooperation with federal agencies, McKay pointed the finger at Transocean, which is responsible for the blowout preventer, the instrument designed to seal a well if something goes wrong. “The systems are intended to fail-close and be fail-safe,” McKay said. “Sadly and for reasons we do not yet understand, in this case, they were not.” Transocean’s Newman denied the charge, arguing the “sudden, catastrophic failure” had to be related to the cement or casing process, which Halliburton works on. And Halliburton’s Probert said his company had performed its obligations in accordance with BP’s directives.

Give some Senators credit for calling the witnesses on their determination to pass the buck. “I get one message, and that message is, ‘Don’t blame me,’ ” said Republican Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming. “I would suggest to the three of you that we are all in this together,” said Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski, who in her opening remarks stressed the importance of offshore drilling to the U.S. economy. New Jersey Democrat Robert Menendez called the finger-pointing a “liability chase.”

Before denying culpability, each of the three company chiefs hewed to the unwritten dictates of these exercises by apologizing and acknowledging the impact on victims’ families and the Gulf Coast economy. McKay said his company is willing — as the law mandates — to shoulder the cost of the cleanup and claims. Pressed by Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu, McKay said BP expected to exceed its liability limit of $75 million to pay for “legitimate” — i.e., “substantiated” — claims. McKay also insisted that BP has a well-honed operating system. Apparently it doesn’t extend to disasters that are “unforeseen.” As the Washington Post reports, after the failure of its containment-dome solution, BP is now basically attempting to plug the leak with trash:

Engineers will use golf balls and shredded automobile tires in what they call a “junk shot” to try to clog the oil well that has been leaking crude at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico since the sinking last month of the drilling rig Deepwater Horizon.

“We’ll be pumping pieces of tire. We’ll be pumping knots in ropes,” Kent Wells, senior vice president of exploration and production for BP, said in a news briefing Monday. “There’s a little bit of a science in this, even though it sounds odd.”

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Everybody has won, and all must have prizes….

  • kevin

    I think many of those senators are passing the buck themselves.
    .
    Menendez has always been a critic of offshore drilling, but what were the attitudes of Landrieu, Murkowski, and Barrasso when the Bush administration relaxed MMS guidelines on offshore rig safety regulations in 2003? I bet they all had kinder words for the industry back then — Landrieu certainly did.

  • nflfoghorn

    Circular firing squad comes to mind….
    .
    Also, how can a company that makes billions of $ every three months have the problem-solving capability of a Little League team? (no offense to Little Leaguers)
    .
    And, why did they have to drill so deep that no man can fix what broke?

  • nflfoghorn

    OK, once again: What did Dick tell Big Oil when they met in secret?

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Fine them all and let them sue each other when actual proof arrives – if it ever does. They all had a part in this and the only company that reasonably could argue a lack of liability ATM is Haliburton – and that’s ONLY if it’s proven that the concrete wasn’t actually poured incorrectly. It doesn’t matter that they did whatever BP required of them, if that’s ALL the did, then they did the minimum required in their contract rather than what was required for the safety of the planet. Transocean’s fail-safe system didn’t work – doesn’t matter why it didn’t work, it didn’t work. The fact that they didn’t have a contingency is a problem they have to deal with. BP’s well exploded. I don’t care that the pipe is leaking oil, why did the well explode in the first place? If the well hadn’t exploded, the fail safe wouldn’t have needed to be triggered.
    .
    They are all liable, they all deserve to be held accountable, and they should all stop trying to pass the buck.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I’ve been saying that every time somebody says “we still need off shore drilling despite this accident” or some such nonsense. Just because an oil company has figured out how to drill to such depths doesn’t mean they should, not when – especially now, they are proving they have no idea how to handle an accident.
    .
    I have a strong feeling this well will keep gushing its oil into the Gulf until it runs dry.

  • nflfoghorn

    I’m not even saying we shouldn’t drill out there at all, but if we are then we need to make darn sure we know how to plug a leak. Since this was an “exploratory” well there shouldn’t have been this much risk involved in drilling that far down. I know Big Oil was influenced by NIMBY but if they could’ve found oil in shallower spots it should’ve done that to begin with if they didn’t know how to stop a leak.

  • kevin

    Oh, we’ve long known how to plug the leak. An acoustic trigger would have done the job easily.
    .
    But BP lobbied aggressively against having to have that safeguard in place because the $500,000 price tag was too high for them.
    .
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/may/03/usa-dickcheney

  • shepherdwong

    Plenty of blame to go around but (small surprise) I’d start with every corporatist “conservative” since Ronald Reagan who told the country that “government is the problem” and that government regulations are harmful to the nation’s interests. This is just the latest, best example (by about two years) that industry can’t regulate itself and that all those “conservatives” were lying all along.

  • nflfoghorn

    I wouldn’t say lie…I’d say they’re pretty oblivious to the truth.

  • gysgt213

    I think we are going to be able to confirm eventually, that the only plans BP had in the event of a major leak or spill was to risk one not happening in the first place. If there was a spill then chances were probably pretty high in their view it would be one they could contain.
    .
    There is a lot of drilling going on in the gulf. A lot more than most of realize. There are also a spills and leaks, but they are not major so they don’t gain that much media attention.
    .
    There is also a lot of money to made.

  • nflfoghorn

    Being cheap means never having to say you’re sorry. Sadly.

  • stinkfut

    Plugging the leak with golf balls, tires and trash?

    Good Lord, either they’ve got a bunch of 10 year old boys working this problem, or they really have no idea what to do next.

  • stuartzechman

    Nobody could have predicted…

  • kevin

    Heh.

  • Joe Bftsplk

    Engineer’s point of view:
    I’ll bet that someone (most likely in BP) has done a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on the system, and identified that the pipe could be severed. That’s why they installed the blowout preventer. So far so good.
    I’ll further bet that there’s an FMEA that acknowledges that the blowout preventer itself could fail, and probably even identified the specific cause of this particular failure, along with a few dozen other things that could go wrong. Engineers being compulsive problem solvers, they probably had a proposal on how to ensure that the blowout preventer was in working order.
    Being on a roll, my next bet is that the corporate liability analysts who commissioned this FMEA evaluated the potential costs of catastrophe against the certain costs of prevention, and decided to bet on success.
    My final wager is that there are some engineers who warned about this very event, and who are now contemplating murder-suicide.

  • http://www.flickr.com/hubbmax hubbmax

    Right on!

  • http://www.flickr.com/hubbmax hubbmax

    Right on! — stuartzechman.

  • nflfoghorn

    We’re now down to the trashy blogs of Rusty, Spoob and 3xfire3 to plug the hole. Bad as that joke was, that’s pretty much where the ideas for BP (Blocking Progress) are at now.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Exactly!
    .
    Wasn’t there a quote in West Wing: “Nuclear plants don’t melt down when one thing fails. They melt down with a dozen things fail”. Guess what, we had a minimum of 3 failures here, possibly 4 or 5.
    .
    1) Whatever caused the explosion
    2) Fail-switch on pipe failed to activate
    3) (Possibly) Concrete not done properly
    4) There wasn’t enough redundancy to ensure reasonable risk control
    5) (Possibly) There wasn’t enough redundancy in the fail-switch to deal with concrete issues.

  • afguy

    This remind anyone of the aftermath of the Challenger explosion?
    .
    Replace BP with Morton-Thiokol….

  • afguy

    Good Lord, either they’ve got a bunch of 10 year old boys working this problem, or they really have no idea what to do next.
    .
    Personally, I think option 2 is definitely the operative choice now. That dome was such a Rube-Goldberg solution that I thought at the time it was a “shot-in-the- dark”.
    .
    Now, they’re just reaching…

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I’m eagerly anticipating the next post on this topic: what does John McCain or Sarah Palin think!

  • nflfoghorn

    They DO???

  • gloriousglo2

    Drill, baby, drill, disco inferno….

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    “It was hard for me to wrap my head around the arrogance and short-sightedness that led to this disaster, until last night, in the course of my bedtime reading, I was reminded of the Taliban destroying the Buddhas of Bamyan. The two incidents don’t necessarily seem to have much in common; the Taliban deliberately set out to wipe out these priceless artifacts because they offended their joy-killing, art-hating sensibilities. The oil spill, of course, is an accident. But I’d argue that there’s a common thread between the incidents that led up to both these acts of unfathomable destruction.

    “Whatever the ostensible excuse the Taliban had for destroying the Buddhas, outsiders can clearly see that they’re motivated mainly be a petulant unwillingness to engage or regard anything that makes them feel smaller or less important. Pleasure and beauty offend fundamentalists, because these things are out of their control and present a threat to their death grip on power. Art reminds people that there’s something more than the tightly controlled, colorless existence offered by fundamentalism, and so the fundamentalists are wary of it…

    “Drill, baby, drill!” was a slogan that revealed that, for conservatives, the potential for environmental destruction is a reward unto itself. It excites. It makes you feel big and important, that mere nature will bend to your will. Only softies care about things like preserving the past or securing the future. Past and future are concepts that offend the narcissism of right wingers, since both concepts remind you that there’s more to this world than you and what you want. Preserving the environment for its own sake seems pointless, since that just means that it’ll survive you, which reminds you that you’re mortal and will one day be forgotten. And so just as the Taliban blew up those Buddhas that stood as stark reminders that there’s more to this universe than their petty little egos, so American conservatives yelled, “Drill, baby, drill!”

    http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/take_no_seagulls_prisoner/

  • Joe Bftsplk

    Interesting thesis.
    The thing that strikes me about the viewpoint expressed as “Only softies care about things like preserving the past or securing the future” is that it’s antithetical to what “conservative” is supposed to mean.
    So perhaps “right wing” should be substituted.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Doesn’t rubber float?

  • stinkfut

    Yeah, that dome contraption seemed like a shot in the dark. Imagine that, the hole gets clogged and it doesn’t work. Anyone who’s ever clogged a toilet can tell you how that comes out.

    I imagine they’re starting to hope the well just runs dry and they can slink off to hide behind the lawyers.

  • greg535353

    the article is not corrrect in ownership – Transocean owns the Horizon, not BP. BP chartered/contracted for it’s use. BP “owns” the mineral lease that the well was drilled on.

    one important player missing was Cameron who designed and fabricated the blowout preventer that Transocean bought and installed on this well.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Joe, in part I agree. After all, Teddy Roosevelt and Richard Nixon (EPA) were conservatives. Obviously anachronistic considering what’s happened to the GOP since the advent of the church of Reagan. But so do FDR or LBJ when surveying the dems since 1992.
    .
    The Marcotte piece reminds me of something I read just yesterday:
    .
    “How many centuries Indians have roamed these woods nobody knows, probably a great many, extending far beyond the time that Columbus touched our shores, and it seems strange that heavier marks have not been made. Indians walk softly and hurt the landscape hardly more than the birds and squirrels, and their brush and- baxk huts last hardly longer than those of wood rats, while their more enduring monuments, excepting those wrought on the forests by the fires they made to improve their hunting grounds, vanish in a few centuries.
    .
    How different are most of those of the white man, especially on the lower gold region roads blasted in the solid rock, wild streams dammed and tamed and turned out of their channels and led along the sides of cations and valleys to work in mines like slaves. Crossing from ridge to ridge, high in the air, on long straddling trestles as if flowing on stilts, or down and up across valleys and hills, imprisoned in iron pipes to strike and wash away hills and miles of the skin of the mountain’s face, riddling, stripping every gold gully and flat. These are the white man’s marks made in a few feverish years, to say nothing of mills, fields, villages, scattered hundreds of miles along the flank of the Range. Long will it be ere these marks are effaced, though Nature is doing what she can, replanting, gardening, sweeping away old dams and flumes, leveling gravel and boulder piles, patiently trying to heal every raw scar.”
    .
    John Muir, “My First Summer in the Sierra”

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    To the best of my understanding, it not working means BP is completely screwed. The plan, originally, was to have the dome control flow for 3 months while they drill a hole to put concrete in to stop the flow. Now that it didn’t work, they’ve still got to take 3 months to get the concrete in so they’re trying everything they can to at least slow if not control the flow. From that perspective, this plan *may* make sense, but not that much.
    .
    They can’t wait for the well to run dry. Normally, you pump water into a well to push the oil up to get it out. In this case, there’s nothing but water and (if I heard correctly) 3 tubes into the well. One tube brings in water, two tubes spit out oil. It’ll keep going until there’s no more oil – and when you consider that most oil reserves are big enough to fill many, many, many oil tankers, they really can’t wait that long.

  • shepherdwong

    “So perhaps “right wing” should be substituted.”
    .
    I like the scare quotes treatment myself, indicating that the recent specific meaning of the term has now been lost to something very…different. And, unlike the bastardization of the term liberal by “conservatives”, they did it to themselves.

  • apr2563

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/5/11/865387/-Fishgrease:-DKos-Booming-School
    The above link is to a person who has been in oil and gas production for over 30 years. Be aware, it is quite colorful in it’s language. The poster is quite angry. It has a great overview about booming, about the methods being used to stop the “leak”, and the incompetency of BP and their contractors. Really, a lot of information from a pro.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Shep, good pt. and scare quotes are also easier than a winded explanation (I use this term in the sense…)
    .
    I agree that the evolution of “liberal” as a pejorative can be largely attributed to conservatives and their H20 carriers in the media. However, at every step of the process, far too many genuine liberals shied away from using the term, which is IMO even more damaging/enabling. Obviously, non/faux liberals wouldn’t want to embrace it.
    .
    But the left, from the water cooler to the public arena, has far too many pansies petrified of clearly delineating what exactly it is they believe. No surprise given that liberalism, highly sophisticated, intellectual & reality/science-based, is an affront to a public discourse dominated by the willful embrace of the stupid, simple, polarized bobbleheads.

  • square1

    Its not rocket science. You need to create disincentives for bad behavior.

    Who among us is not frustrated when the real-world “worst case scenario” vastly exceeds the pre-accident “worst case scenario? BTW, this goes for Wall Street as well.

    My suggestion would be to impose severe criminal liability for any accident that exceeds a company’s stated “worst case scenario”. My guess is that corporate executives would be a whole lot more honest about risks if the “worst case scenario” was them spending 10 years in a federal prison.

  • Alex Altman

    “Transocean owns the Horizon, not BP. BP chartered/contracted for it’s use. BP “owns” the mineral lease that the well was drilled on.”

    You’re right. I’ve updated to fix. Thanks for the catch.

  • square1

    Now we know why Chevron named an oil tanker after Condi Rice.

  • stuartzechman

    unlike the bastardization of the term liberal by “conservatives”, they did it to themselves.
    .
    This is a very good point.

  • stuartzechman

    Thanks so much, Alex Altman.

  • stuartzechman

    …and, of course I must mention, there were this other type of ideologue than conservative who were instrumental in turning “liberal” into an unmentionable slur…

  • apr2563

    There was an oil spill, leak, gusher? Wow!

  • shepherdwong

    “No surprise given that liberalism, highly sophisticated, intellectual & reality/science-based, is an affront to a public discourse dominated by the willful embrace of the stupid, simple, polarized bobbleheads.”
    .
    I’ve always found the nerd/jock analogy interesting. In some ways, we never get past junior high school (particularly the jocks). Of course, eventually the hot chicks discover that the nerds are better at sex (and most everything else), so there’s that.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Shep, which is why I find WH correspondents’ dinner being referred to as “nerd prom” so insulting. Most of the nerds I know–scientists, intellectuals, artists–are in no way shape or form intereted in being fanboy courtiers.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Including the Post Article, did you ever notice that the photos of oil spills mostly show people washing birds?

    Some part of me (the primordial, less intelligent gut reaction) sees a picture like that and makes me think “Oh, so some pretty birdies gut messy… BFD.”

    The giant balls of tar and thick layers of oily foam covering beaches with dead fish floating in the mix would have a much larger impact on me.

    The many years to recover the ecosystem and the entire economy in effected areas is, obviously, the big concern.

    However, with out ADD-like society wanting to show it all in a picture, showing college girls and, often, wimpy guys washing ducks just doesn’t tell the story.

    A picture like that makes it appear to be an animal rights story rather than a tragedy with economic implications not far worse than a terrorist attack and long term damage far worse.

    Personally, when it comes to animal rights, I eat animals every day. The one thing I am vaguely animal-rights about is that I am reluctant to eat Capon – I mean, killing it is one thing but cutting off a rooster’s…

  • kbanginmotown

    apr: Truly, truly, awesome f@cking link.
    .
    About time somebody explained what f#cking proper f&cking booming looks like.

  • stuartzechman

    The press corps came up with “nerd prom,” surely.
    .
    Anyone else would have accurately named it “dork prom.”

blog comments powered by Disqus