Fox News and Politico, Sure. But Now President Obama Targets iTunes and Halo?

Today, in a commencement speech at Hampton University, President Obama expanded his definition of negative media information overload to include not just the 24/7 media but also Xbox and PlayStation.

You’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank that high on the truth meter.  And with iPods and iPads; and Xboxes and PlayStations — none of which I know how to work — (laughter) — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation.  So all of this is not only putting pressure on you; it’s putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy.

Obama was about 24 years old when Nintendo introduced Super Mario Brothers in 1984, and he admits that he does not spend much time playing Grand Theft Auto. But still this is a pretty striking charge: Video games and iPod playlists are putting pressure on our country and our democracy? Obviously his big point is two-fold: The press is obsessed with stupid stuff that is often wrong, and youth should spend more time on weightier things, which is a perennial concern of older folk. But he wraps his argument awkwardly, and perhaps just for the laugh, around a set of newfangled devices, as if kids listening to Lady Gaga on an iPod are somehow more of a concern than the kids who listened to Led Zepplin IV on vinyl. (Or the kids who quoted Peter Tosh in college essays?) Or maybe he is making a more radical point: Digital entertainment and empowerment are in opposition. High-tech entertainment is worse than low-tech entertainment. Let the kids played jacks, not Super Street Fighter IV. If that’s his point, it’s an easy misconception to clear up. Steve Jobs should just send an iPad over to the Oval Office with the complete works of Edmund Burke and Reinhold Niebuhr pre-loaded and ready to read with page-turning sound effects.

President Obama’s full commencement speech at Hampton after the jump.

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you very much.  Thank you.  Thank you, Hampton.  Thank you, Class of 2010.  (Applause.)  Please, everybody, please have a seat.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  I love you!

THE PRESIDENT:  I love you back.  (Applause.)  That’s why I’m here.  I love you guys.

Good morning, everybody.

AUDIENCE:  Good morning.

THE PRESIDENT:  To all the mothers in the house:  As somebody who is surrounded by women in the White House — (laughter) — grew up surrounded by women, let me take a moment just to say thank you for all that you put up with each and every day.  We are so grateful to you, and it is fitting to have such a beautiful day when we celebrate all our mothers.  Thank you to Hampton for allowing me to share this special occasion — to all the dignitaries who are here, the trustees, the alumni, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins — that’s a cousin over there.  (Laughter).

Now, before we get started, I just want to say, I’m excited the Battle of the Real H.U. will be taking place in Washington this year.  (Laughter.)  You know I am not going to pick sides.  (Laughter.)  But my understanding is it’s been 13 years since the Pirates lost.  (Applause.)  As one Hampton alum on my staff put it, the last time Howard beat Hampton, The Fugees were still together. (Laughter.)

Well, let me also say a word about President Harvey, a man who bleeds Hampton blue.  In a single generation, Hampton has transformed from a small black college into a world-class research institution.  (Applause.)  And that transformation has come through the efforts of many people, but it has come through President Harvey’s efforts, in particular, and I want to commend him for his outstanding leadership as well as his great friendship to me.  (Applause.)

Most of all, I want to congratulate all of you, the Class of 2010.  I gather that none of you walked across Ogden Circle.  (Laughter.)  You did?  Okay.

You know, we meet here today, as graduating classes have met for generations, not far from where it all began, near that old oak tree off Emancipation Drive.  I know my University 101.  (Laughter and applause.)  There, beneath its branches, by what was then a Union garrison, about 20 students gathered on September 17th, 1861.  Taught by a free citizen, in defiance of Virginia law, the students were escaped slaves from nearby plantations, who had fled to the fort seeking asylum.

And after the war’s end, a retired Union general sought to enshrine that legacy of learning.  So with a collection from church groups, Civil War veterans, and a choir that toured Europe, Hampton Normal and Agricultural Institute was founded here, by the Chesapeake –- a home by the sea.

Now, that story is no doubt familiar to many of you. But it’s worth reflecting on why it happened; why so many people went to such trouble to found Hampton and all our Historically Black Colleges and Universities.  The founders of these institutions knew, of course, that inequality would persist long into the future.  They were not naïve.  They recognized that barriers in our laws, and in our hearts, wouldn’t vanish overnight.

But they also recognized the larger truth; a distinctly American truth.  They recognized, Class of 2010, that the right education might allow those barriers to be overcome; might allow our God-given potential to be fulfilled.  They recognized, as Frederick Douglass once put it, that “education…means emancipation.”  They recognized that education is how America and its people might fulfill our promise.  That recognition, that truth –- that an education can fortify us to rise above any barrier, to meet any test –- is reflected, again and again, throughout our history.

In the midst of civil war, we set aside land grants for schools like Hampton to teach farmers and factory-workers the skills of an industrializing nation.  At the close of World War II, we made it possible for returning GIs to attend college, building and broadening our great middle class.  At the Cold War’s dawn, we set up Area Studies Centers on our campuses to prepare graduates to understand and address the global threats of a nuclear age.

So education is what has always allowed us to meet the challenges of a changing world.  And Hampton, that has never been more true than it is today.  This class is graduating at a time of great difficulty for America and for the world.  You’re entering a job market, in an era of heightened international competition, with an economy that’s still rebounding from the worst crisis since the Great Depression. You’re accepting your degrees as America still wages two wars –- wars that many in your generation have been fighting.

And meanwhile, you’re coming of age in a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments, some of which don’t always rank that high on the truth meter.  And with iPods and iPads; and Xboxes and PlayStations — none of which I know how to work — (laughter) — information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation.  So all of this is not only putting pressure on you; it’s putting new pressure on our country and on our democracy.

Class of 2010, this is a period of breathtaking change, like few others in our history.  We can’t stop these changes, but we can channel them, we can shape them, we can adapt to them.  And education is what can allow us to do so.  It can fortify you, as it did earlier generations, to meet the tests of your own time.

And first and foremost, your education can fortify you against the uncertainties of a 21st century economy.  In the 19th century, folks could get by with a few basic skills, whether they learned them in a school like Hampton, or picked them up along the way.  As long as you were willing to work, for much of the 20th century, a high school diploma was a ticket into a solid middle class life. That is no longer the case.

Jobs today often require at least a bachelor’s degree, and that degree is even more important in tough times like these.  In fact, the unemployment rate for folks who’ve never gone to college is over twice as high as for folks with a college degree or more.

Now, the good news is you’re already ahead of the curve.  All those checks you or your parents wrote to Hampton will pay off.  (Laughter.)  You’re in a strong position to outcompete workers around the world.  But I don’t have to tell you that too many folks back home aren’t as well prepared.  Too many young people, just like you, are not as well prepared.  By any number of different yardsticks, African Americans are being outperformed by their white classmates, as are Hispanic Americans.  Students in well-off areas are outperforming students in poorer rural or urban communities, no matter what skin color.

Globally, it’s not even close.  In 8th grade science and math, for example, American students are ranked about 10th overall compared to top-performing countries.  But African Americans are ranked behind more than 20 nations, lower than nearly every other developed country.

So all of us have a responsibility, as Americans, to change this; to offer every single child in this country an education that will make them competitive in our knowledge economy.  That is our obligation as a nation.  (Applause.)

But I have to say, Class of 2010, all of you have a separate responsibility.  To be role models for your brothers and sisters.  To be mentors in your communities. And, when the time comes, to pass that sense of an education’s value down to your children, a sense of personal responsibility and self-respect.  To pass down a work ethic and an intrinsic sense of excellence that made it possible for you to be here today.

So, allowing you to compete in the global economy is the first way your education can prepare you.  But it can also prepare you as citizens.  With so many voices clamoring for attention on blogs, and on cable, on talk radio, it can be difficult, at times, to sift through it all; to know what to believe; to figure out who’s telling the truth and who’s not.  Let’s face it, even some of the craziest claims can quickly gain traction.  I’ve had some experience in that regard.

Fortunately, you will be well positioned to navigate this terrain.  Your education has honed your research abilities, sharpened your analytical powers, given you a context for understanding the world.  Those skills will come in handy.

But the goal was always to teach you something more. Over the past four years, you’ve argued both sides of a debate.  You’ve read novels and histories that take different cuts at life.

AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Amen!

THE PRESIDENT:  You’ve discovered — see, I got a little “Amen” there, somebody — (laughter) — you’ve discovered interests you didn’t know you had.  You’ve made friends who didn’t grow up the same way you did.  You’ve tried things you’d never done before, including some things we won’t talk about in front of your parents.  (Laughter.)

All of this, I hope, has had the effect of opening your mind; of helping you understand what it’s like to walk in somebody else’s shoes.  But now that your minds have been opened, it’s up to you to keep them that way.  It will be up to you to open minds that remain closed that you meet along the way.  That, after all, is the elemental test of any democracy: whether people with differing points of view can learn from each other, and work with each other, and find a way forward together.

And I’d add one further observation.  Just as your education can fortify you, it can also fortify our nation, as a whole.  More and more, America’s economic preeminence, our ability to outcompete other countries, will be shaped not just in our boardrooms, not just on our factory floors, but in our classrooms, and our schools, at universities like Hampton.  It will be determined by how well all of us, and especially our parents, educate our sons and daughters.

What’s at stake is more than our ability to outcompete other nations.  It’s our ability to make democracy work in our own nation.  Now, years after he left office, decades after he penned the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson sat down, a few hours’ drive from here, in Monticello, and wrote a letter to a longtime legislator, urging him to do more on education.  And Jefferson gave one principal reason –- the one, perhaps, he found most compelling. “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free,” he wrote, “it expects what never was and never will be.”

What Jefferson recognized, like the rest of that gifted founding generation, was that in the long run, their improbable experiment –- called America –- wouldn’t work if its citizens were uninformed, if its citizens were apathetic, if its citizens checked out, and left democracy who those — to those who didn’t have the best interests of all the people at heart.  It could only work if each of us stayed informed and engaged; if we held our government accountable; if we fulfilled the obligations of citizenship.

The success of their experiment, they understood, depended on the participation of its people -– the participation of Americans like all of you.  The participation of all those who have ever sought to perfect our union.

I had a great honor of delivering a tribute to one of those Americans last week, an American named Dorothy Height.  (Applause.)

And as you probably know, Dr. Height passed away the other week at the age of 98.  One of the speakers at this memorial was her nephew who was 88.  And I said that’s a sign of a full life when your nephew is 88.  Dr. Height had been on the firing line for every fight from lynching to desegregation to the battle for health care reform.  She was with Eleanor Roosevelt and she was with Michelle Obama.  She lived a singular life; one of the giants upon whose shoulders I stand.  But she started out just like you, understanding that to make something of herself, she needed a college degree.

So, she applied to Barnard College –- and she got in. Except, when she showed up, they discovered she wasn’t white as they had believed.  And they had already given their two slots for African Americans to other individuals.  Those slots, two, had already been filled.  But Dr. Height was not discouraged.  She was not deterred.  She stood up, straight-backed, and with Barnard’s acceptance letter in hand, she marched down to New York University, and said, “Let me in.”  And she was admitted right away.

I want all of you to think about this, Class of 2010, because you’ve gone through some hardships, undoubtedly, in arriving to where you are today.  There have been some hard days, and hard exams, and you felt put upon.  And undoubtedly you will face other challenges in the future.

But I want you to think about Ms. Dorothy Height, a black woman, in 1929, refusing to be denied her dream of a college education.  Refusing to be denied her rights.  Refusing to be denied her dignity.  Refusing to be denied her place in America, her piece of America’s promise. Refusing to let any barriers of injustice or ignorance or inequality or unfairness stand in her way.  (Applause.) That refusal to accept a lesser fate; that insistence on a better life, that, ultimately, is the secret not only of African American survival and success, it has been the secret of America’s survival and success.  (Applause.)

So, yes, an education can fortify us to meet the tests of our economy, the tests of our citizenship, and the tests of our times.  But what ultimately makes us American, quintessentially American, is something that can’t be taught -– a stubborn insistence on pursuing our dreams.

It’s the same insistence that led a band of patriots to overthrow an empire.  That fired the passions of union troops to free the slaves and union veterans to found schools like Hampton.  That led foot-soldiers the same age as you to brave fire-hoses on the streets of Birmingham and billy clubs on a bridge in Selma.  That led generation after generation of Americans to toil away, quietly, your parents and grandparents and great-grandparents and great-great grandparents, without complaint, in the hopes of a better life for their children and grandchildren.

That is what makes us who we are.  A dream of brighter days ahead, a faith in things not seen, a belief that here, in this country, we are the authors of our own destiny.  That is what Hampton is all about.  And it now falls to you, the Class of 2010, to write the next great chapter in America’s story; to meet the tests of your own time; to take up the ongoing work of fulfilling our founding promise. I’m looking forward to watching.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.  (Applause.)

Related Topics: technophobia, Barack Obama
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Cliff

    Or maybe he is making a more radical point: Digital entertainment and empowerment are in opposition. High-tech entertainment is worse than low-tech entertainment. Let the kids played [sic] jacks, not Super Street Fighter IV. If that’s his point, it’s an easy misconception to clear up.
    .
    Yeah, I guess you could extrapolate wildly in order to draw a completely different conclusion than common sense would dictate.
    .
    If you really wanted to.

  • Art Pepper

    Um, maybe he’s just saying that people are overloaded with information and entertainment, and that this is not necessarily conducive to thoughtful engagement with the world.

    Kind of a truism these days, no?

    And yeah, I’m sure the kids are using their iPads to read Burke.

  • maverick2k9

    Dont know if the President is aware of this, but his weekly address is available as a podcast on iTunes and the White House has an iPhone/iPod/iPad app :)
    .
    Which brings me round to a related topic: I cannot view nor post comments on Swampland from my iPhone !! The Time iPhone app does not allow it nor does the mobile version of the Time.com website on iPhone Safari.
    .
    I dont know if this is deliberate or not, but it is definately frustrating.. Like the President, Time.com technology team seems to be a bit behind on the tech learning curve.

  • michaelfury
  • stuartzechman

    I’m kind of with Scherer on this one.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    This isn’t a new argument; here’s a cartoon depiction of the forward to Neil Postman’s 1985 book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death”:http://imgur.com/gallery/zP5fa
    -
    Postman has a very good point, I think, about our “almost infinite appetite for distractions.” (I happen to be of the view that he puts too much emphasis on the matter of the medium of communication, rather than the speed and ubiquity of access to information).
    -
    His argument, and Obama’s, doesn’t mean that technology is bad; it means that it can be used unproductively. You listened to Led Zep and Peter Tosh albums on vinyl in your room or your living room; now, you listen to Lady Gaga singles everywhere. Yeah, it’s different.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Sorry, here’s the link: http://imgur.com/gallery/zP5fa

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I see that a few people have beaten me to the punch but it’s consistent with something I said a couple of days ago. The problem isn’t unique to the digital age. Our attention spans have been getting shorter for decades. The problem is that there are too many people profiting nicely by providing distractions and not enough people actually advertising the benefits of discipline and patience.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    For twenty years now, once I moved out of my parents’ home to go to college I have not had my own television.
    .
    Why?
    .
    For long work hours when it is a quick fix vs actually reading the news or listening to it (radio, print or online) I know I get a much better bang for my buck sitting down and reading things.
    .
    I am so out of touch with the world of entertainment, I didn’t even know that SZ was a musician. (When I drove a cab in Boston while in college in 1992 I didn’t know who Jerry Seinfeld was, either – so it is about me, not you.)
    .
    There is a time and a place for television, fiction, movies, music and video games, but, in addition to playing a huge role in our obesity problem, causes social isolation and failing to be aware of the news is due to too much time playing games and watching America’s funniest home videos prevents people from being responsible, knowledgeable voters.
    .
    If I had a TV, spent too much time on it during this recession slowing down my work I am sure that I would know less than half as much as I do about current events and would weigh at least twenty pounds more.
    .
    All play no learning make Jack a Tea Party member.
    .
    The Tea Party: An uniformed public is our best constituent.

  • Cliff

    On what? That Obama made his point clumsily?

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Agreed that it’s been going on for quite some time. Here’s a pretty killer set of graphs:
    . http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/12/are-you-reading-this-on-your-phone/31660/

  • apr2563

    MS: There you go again making an editorial comment in your headlind. Obama was making a point about our information overload and diversions. If you don’t understand that Michael you are one of the diverted.
    .
    Let me give you some real world experience. When I was teaching school Sesame Street began showing. It was very hard as a teacher to compete with the flash of Sesame Street when keeping kid’s attention.
    .
    Now there are even more diversions. We have to recognize that and learn how to use all the tools and information wisely.
    .
    There was nothing in his speech that related to Fox or Politico. The ego centric press needs to understand not everything derives from you.

  • apr2563

    Correction: headline
    .
    By the way, I watched Joe Klein on Chris Matthews today. They discussed the decline of news magazines. Joe mentioned people get their info from Huff Post and Drudge. Does he never learn?

  • apr2563


    OT:
    Lena Horne passed away today at 92. Great, beautiful singer and civil rights pioneer.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    And I’d add that it’s easy to blame the Xbox or the media. Failing schools must enter this mix. And more than anything … parents. Technology-addled adults having kids. This spells some serious stupid.

  • ilikechips

    You can be pretty sure of those statements were made by Sara Palin..all u fellow libs would be piling on. But instead you each race eachother to defend those idiotic statements. Very Funny

  • kathy

    He was not so much making an argument against these devices, if you’ll notice, but against information becoming a distraction. How can any of us argue with that? We regularly come here for “information,” then get engaged with other people about it, in what is most often a pleasant diversion.

    Yes, occasionally my mind is changed or I learn something that is important to me. More often I’m entertained in a way that doesn’t enhance my “empowerment.”

  • kevin

    That Postman book is worth a read. The part contrasting the style and substance of the Lincoln-Douglas debates and those of contemporary politics will make you depressed, though.

  • yjfischer

    Its kind of Ironic that

    1) He claims he cannot operate an iPad or iPod when one of the major points about his presidency vs. McCain was that McCain didnt know how to operate a blackberry and get email when he was so connected.

    2) He gave an iPod (filled with pictures) to the queen of England as a gift.

    Typical hypocrisy and double standard of our current leadership and the people that voted for him.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    If Sarah Palin had made such statements, we’d all be noting the mind-numbing irony of someone whose main contribution to our discourse is ghost-written facebook posts, complaining about our inadequate attention spans……

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    This Post is Closed Captioned for the humor impaired…….

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    Obama is also on record as having operated an iPod, from a link I buried in the post above:
    .
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/25/barackobama.uselections2008

  • kevin

    Palin would have gotten halfway through that speech before deciding she could serve her audience better by quitting.

  • kevin

    Typical hypocrisy and double standard of our current leadership and the people that voted for him.
    .
    Should we wheel the fainting couch in for you?
    .
    Or will you be able to stand on your own as your clutch your pearls to your chest with a trembling hand?

  • yjfischer

    “Or will you be able to stand on your own as your clutch your pearls to your chest with a trembling hand?”

    Regrettably, my pearls were ripped from me to pay for TARP and the latest IMF/Eurozone Scam bailout.

  • grape_crush

    /sigh

    Another effort by Scherer to gin up controversy. Nice headline, Mike. If Scherer would have gone past his urge to stir something up and truly thought about that passage, he might have had a better post.

    President Obama expanded his definition of negative media information overload to include not just the 24/7 media but also Xbox and PlayStation.

    No.

    The press is obsessed with stupid stuff that is often wrong, and youth should spend more time on weightier things..

    No. (But still true and somewhat interesting that Scherer brings it up in his somewhat creative interpretation of Obama’s remarks…)

    Or maybe he is making a more radical point..

    No.

    If that’s his point..

    Again, no. The point is that the signal-to-noise ratio is at the point – currently – where the noise almost completely overwhelms the signal. It isn’t the technology per se, but the fact that it allows us to customize our own information flows in ways that were unavailable to us in past decades…

    In one way, that’s a good thing; people like me who aren’t getting what they need from a “press is obsessed with stupid stuff that is often wrong” can more easily locate the information they want in order to keep informed.

    In another, it’s not so good. The more closed minded will purposefully limit the breadth of information they can encounter when it threatens to conflict with their worldview…carried to an extreme, it results in a form of epistemic closure, where information that does not come from those self-limited sources is automatically dissmissed as invalid.

    Now, what to do about this (and how to correct it), I haven’t thought about; it’s not an easy problem to solve.

  • allthingsinaname

    I think this article is a prime example of what Obama was talking about.

    Talk about drivel, diversion, distraction, but, he is wrong, it is not entertaining.

  • lupercal5

    i think he was mainly thinking about the porn revolution/boom as unconstructive information. but given his current job and current setting, he couldn’t make the point as straightforwardly as he wished. and he’s not talking about the amount of information available. it’s more the eyecandy that coats it. i mean, im sure you all were aware of the twitter reenactment of the shakespearean or something. that.

  • Bemused

    Surely you haven’t forgotten that TARP was done under Bush’s administration?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    He was talking about this country’s near obsession with distractions, of any kind, any place. The average adult now has the attention span of a 5 yr. old.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Can you all make your posts shorter!

    It’s so hard to pay attention with the television, my Ipod on while I am trying to text message this girl!
    :D

    (Not me – but that is how much Americans are today)

  • shepherdwong

    And I used to think, at least, the guy was really, really smart.
    .
    “…their improbable experiment –- called America –- wouldn’t work if its citizens were uninformed, if its citizens were apathetic, if its citizens checked out, and left democracy who those — to those who didn’t have the best interests of all the people at heart.”
    .
    Citizens, by and large, become uninformed, apathetic and check out when there is no one there to lead them. With the generation-long embargo of liberal opinion in mainstream discourse, they’re left to follow the cramped lies of the right (which are shockingly appealing to the most retrograde elements of society) and the valueless technocracy of the pathological centrists. Unless and until real liberal values and thought are reintroduced to public political discourse, I predict that many people will continue to find something other to do than engage in the crippled political debate framed and provided by our corporate media. As the guy with the loudest, valueless megaphone on the planet, perhaps Obama should walk past the Xbox, right to the mirror.

  • apr2563

    MS: Really, an entire post dedicated to an ironic statement made by the President on the iPod and Xbox? I sense, Michael, that you might be reaching here for a controversy that is a little shallow. Dig a little deeper next time.

  • apr2563

    Including MS since he doesn’t get Obama’s point.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan
  • shepherdwong

    Thanks, jc, I had not. Needless to say, I am well aware of Obama’s gross failure to address the epic teachable moments, vis-a-vis liberalism vs. conservatism, we’ve enjoyed these past two years. I view it as his greatest failure as President, worse than his continued trashing of the Constitution, from FISA to covering up Bush war crimes, to engaging in his own egregious abuse of executive power. But the fact is, Obama could be considered smart, if not wise, for refusing to give Kuttner’s speech and here’s why:

    Nearly six in 10 in the new poll say the Republicans aren’t doing enough to forge compromise with President Obama on important issues; more than four in 10 see Obama as doing too little to get GOP support. Among independents, 56 percent see the Republicans in Congress as too unbending and 50 percent say so of the president; 28 percent of independents say both sides are doing too little to find agreement.

    We have met the enemy and it is our politically vacuous middle, led by our pathologically corporatist and centrist media elite. Obama believes that he must pander to them and avoid the epithet “liberal” at all costs. As a politician it’s hard to ague with that assessment, even if it makes him a dismal failure as a national leader.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    I dug his piece as a progressive naturally would. Up to the point where assumes Obama shares progressive ideals. In this regard, his hypothetical argument (assuming Obama is a liberal besieged on all sides) hits the wall. It’s not that Obama simply fails to make Kuttner’s speech–it’s why would he possibly do so when that would-be lecture seems to run counter to his political tendencies.

  • shepherdwong

    “…why would he possibly do so when that would-be lecture seems to run counter to his political tendencies.”
    .
    His political tendencies are completely bi-partisan and centrist, they have been since his days at Harvard Law Review. They’ve served him well in his quest for power. Liberals are becoming discouraged by what increasingly appears not to lie in his heart of hearts. His political convictions having been shown for what they are I’m not sure it really matters much unless things become much more dire, in which case we’d better pray that there’s more good there than he’s been willing to let on.

blog comments powered by Disqus