Reading the Immigration Smoke Signals

President Obama may have (one hopes inadvertently) killed the immigration bill prematurely last week, but that doesn’t mean that Senate Democrats aren’t still pushing ahead with the legislation. Senators Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer last week introduced a 22-page outline of a bill – noticeably without South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham’s support. It was important, however, to release something in writing so that immigrant rights groups could have a bird in hand when lobbying other GOP senators to consider signing on to the negotiations (thus far, none have). Dems have said they will not press forward on a floor vote unless there is at least some bipartisan support.

A push on immigration could help vulnerable Dems in states where there are large Hispanic communities such as Nevada (Harry Reid), Colorado (Michael Bennet), California (Barbara Boxer) and Florida (Kendrick Meek). “They need — across the board — all the slivers of turnout that they possibly can get because they have an unenthusiastic base right now,” said a Democratic strategist who is close to the Senate Democratic leadership. “Minorities, youth, unmarried women — those three are the groups least likely to turn out, so anything they can do to spike the interest of those groups they’ll be doing. In the case of minorities it’s immigration reform.”

Reid, for example, is unlikely to get the 15% turnout of Hispanic voters Obama saw in 2008. But if he can draw 3% to 5% of that vote, it could potentially make a big difference for his struggling reelection. Which is part of the reason why Reid spent much of last week underlining his long-standing commitment to immigration reform.

Hispanic groups are not going to accept half measures: some lame attempt at passing a partisan bill. To that end, strategists say to look for a (relatively) good faith push that will be capped with a failed committee vote or some other tangible evidence that Democratic efforts on the issue are being blocked by Republicans (assuming here that no Republican signs on to the bill – the odds of which are looking increasingly unlikely). At the same time, Hispanic groups recognize the danger in blowing their political capital too soon: if they demand a floor vote now the issue may not have legs for many years to come, so a careful balance must be struck. Arizona may have given the issue momentum for the moment, but thus far its probably not enough for lift off and the calculus that Hispanic and immigrant rights groups have to make is if a 2011 or 2012 bill with Graham back on board would have a better shot of getting through.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: arizona, Barack Obama, chuck schumer, immigration reform, legisaltion, 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Immigration, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    So Hispanics are willing to put up with injustice/illegal residency for three more years, all in the name of bipartisanship??? Sounds ugly for all parties: Dems for not fighting hard enough, PONs for not fighting at all, “independents” for being blown by the winds of chaos.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Which Senate R’s do you think are most vulnerable to Hispanic voting pressure (is Lindsay Graham included here)? Or would it matter, alas, if the R’s insist on “fencing” themselves off from them? Are the D’s insisting on bipartisan backing because of lack of votes or to pressure R’s more into giving in?
    .
    BTW, hopefully your nerdprom went well. As I asked earlier, do you have pix? (you / teammates, ScarJo, Karen, you + Karen [or ScarJo], Chevy Chase running away, ScarJo, etc.?) Any more stuff coming from Catherine re: election? Per your tweets, sorry to hear about expenses. Is this about London trip? Hey, the High Sheriffs need to understand you were stranded there and that you had to drink per local customs, right?

  • square1

    Hispanic groups are not going to accept half measures: some lame attempt at passing a partisan bill. To that end, strategists say to look for a (relatively) good faith push that will be capped with a failed committee vote or some other tangible evidence that Democratic efforts on the issue are being blocked by Republicans

    Ha ha. Is this a joke? Isn’t legislation stalled out in committee a prime example of a “half-measure”? Only in D.C. is failure considered getting the job done.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    I did say relatively….

  • formerlyjames

    The meaningless, phony issues march on in DC. Not enough to tend to so this is what we get from the blowhards.

  • formerlyjames

    To clarify for those with scrunched up faces and pursed lips, the “not enough to tend to” part is facetious.

  • gysgt213

    I love how the media was all over the marches against the law. Oh wait….. It wasn’t a sparsely attended tea party rally?

  • iggydwonderllama

    Why do Hispanic groups worry about blowing their capital too soon? If the measure is popular (I think it would be), and the Democrats can force the Republicans to publicly block it, like they just did on financial reform, wouldn’t this be a win-win? The Democrats look good while making the Republicans look bad. The Hispanic vote in general is energized, giving the Hispanic groups more capital, not less. And on the off chance they actually get a bill passed, that would probably be a win for the people, although I won’t hold my breath on that one. At least I don’t see a way the people end up hurt by it.

    Is this political capital calculation yours, or one you have heard from sources in Hispanic groups?

  • iggydwonderllama

    And by the way, I appreciate the reporting on this. I don’t mean to sound critical. I’d just like to know. If it’s your reasoning, I disagree, but think it’s worthy of debate. If it’s Hispanic group reasoning, it would have an effect on my opinion of them.

  • square1

    When strategists are saying to “look for” failure in committee they aren’t talking about a “good-faith” attempt. They are talking about half-measures.
    .
    I don’t know what the Hispanic groups will accept. But anything short of passage of meaningful legislation is a half-measure.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I was wondering the similar thing. If the republicans blocked immigration the way they blocked health reform and now wall street reform, it would be a win for the democrats. Wouldn’t it? As far as the Hispanic community was concerned it should be.
    .
    Only two ways the dems can fail at this, in my opinion.
    1. Accept a half measure. Even in committee. That would indicate they themselves aren’t really invested in reform.
    .
    2. Pass a totally disgusting bill that doesn’t really address the underlying problems.
    .
    Oops. I think they’ve already done that. With health reform. And it looks like they might do it again. With wall street reform. The dems are 0:2.

  • kevin

    It’s right there in the media playbook — middle aged white people count twenty times as much as young non-white people. Therefore, 1,000 Tea Party folks are more newsworthy than 10,000 immigration rally folks.
    .
    It’s the same logic that leads to wall-to-wall coverage of missing middle-class white girls, but other kids don’t even merit a yawn.

  • apr2563

    gunny, did you notice also how well the liberal press covered the 10,000 person protest on Wall Street. Nada.
    I guess they didn’t consider them angry enough, working class enough, white enough, and there was no guns.

  • goofy1954

    Despite what some people might think Hispanics are not the only ones that vote in an election. The Dems might have had a better shot at immigration reform this year if they had not crammed health care down our throats, and the voters are not going for another back room deals and bribery kind of bill just to give Obama another 11,000000 votes from illegals he gives a free pass. No amnesty this year and hopefully not next year. If they do the Dems are definitely done for in November and Obamas presidency will basically be finished for the remainder of his term. Now barring immigration Obama sitting in the White House for the next two years unable to accomplish anymore of HIS AGENDA would be the best thing that could happen.

blog comments powered by Disqus