Morning Must Reads: One Hand

White House

President Barack Obama meets with Rev. Billy Graham at his house in Montreat, N.C., April 25, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

–The first Senate procedural vote on financial regulatory reform is scheduled for late this afternoon. There’s no deal yet and top GOP negotiator Richard Shelby says reaching one today is unlikely.

–There’s been a fair amount of ink spilled on the surprising robustness of Blanche Lincoln’s derivatives plan, but how much of her proposal makes it into the final financial reform bill is still largely up in the air. One potential sign it will remain mostly in tact: Democrats have reportedly agreed to include the measure forcing banks to entirely spin off their derivatives desks.

–Populist cat nip: Bob Corker plans to introduce an amendment that would reclaim five years worth of personal earnings from the financial officers of failed firms. It’s powerful politics and policy — just the kind of thing to put to bed concerns that a resolution process would be painless for Wall Street players.

–Stephen Gandel looks at those Goldman e-mails and concludes that, while it didn’t necessarily break the law, the firm was doing more than just hedging: “Goldman was not just betting against the housing market, it was betting the house against the housing market.”

–Paul Krugman directs his ire at the rating agencies.

–The passage of Arizona’s immigration enforcement law has opened a throbbing cultural and political wound with national implications.

Jonathan Martin writes comprehensive immigration reform is politically fraught for both Democrats and Republicans.

Ben Smith points to a pained statement from Arizona Hispanic Republicans.

Mark Halperin takes stock of Obama’s first term and sees a resounding success in governing:

By Election Day, 2010, Obama will have soundly achieved many of his chief campaign promises while running a highly competent, scandal-free government.

It’s easy to lose sight of in the daily grind, but, as with Obama’s candidacy, you can amazingly count the major setbacks on one hand. Another parallel to the campaign: Halperin notes wise personnel decisions play no small role in his success.

–Nancy Gibbs and Michael Duffy have a nice account of the president’s visit to Billy Graham’s home.

Dan Balz looks for meaning in Charlie Crist’s looming decision whether or not to remain in the Republican party. A taste:

If Crist goes the independent route, his decision will be interpreted as the most significant example yet of the “tea party” takeover of the GOP, given the early and enthusiastic support Rubio received from that movement’s activists and supporters.

But the Crist saga cannot be so neatly categorized. This has been an unprecedented establishment conservative revolt against a sitting governor seen as putting personal ambition ahead of political conviction.

–Adam Smith and Steve Bousquet chronicle his rise and fall.

–Arlen Specter gets nods over Joe Sestak from the Inquirer and Post-Gazette.

–Illinois Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias is forced to use his first TV spot to defend himself after the FDIC seized his family’s insolvent bank.

–The president gears up for the midterms.

–Jeff Zeleney and Adam Nagourney explain how everything’s at play.

–Gabriel Sherman explores the commercialization of Sarah Palin at length.

–And Obama’s judicial philosophy: empathy reworded.

What did I miss?

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Congress, Democratic Party, Miscellany, Republican Party, Senate, Uncategorized, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • nflfoghorn

    “…This has been an unprecedented establishment conservative revolt against a sitting governor seen as putting personal ambition ahead of political conviction.”

    Or, IOW, Dubya ****ed it up for Jeb.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    It’s now officially illegal to lose your wallet in Arizona. That’s got to make everyone feel safe…..

  • freeinpa

    What did I miss?

    ==
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/25/AR2010042502131.html

    Will the media label these seditious racist, terro groups?

    ==
    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/36325.html
    Nobody wins? How about the rule of law a winner

    ==
    http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/04/25/geithner-i-never-had-a-real-job/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+wsj/washwire/feed+%28WSJ.com:+Washington+Wire%29

    Geithner: I never had a job. Neither has most of the administrations. Welfare for liberals

    ==

    Clinton Now & then:

    “There is a lot of attention tonight on comments made by former President Bill Clinton, who has weighed in on the angry anti-government rhetoric, ringing out from talk radio to Tea Party rallies. He warns that sometimes firing people up with caustic comments can have unintended and dire consequences.”

    =
    Where was President Clinton when liberal partisans took to the streets with real violence – the kind that generates riot police and mayhem and oh yes, injuries? Throughout all those years of ultra-left civil disruption, there was complete silence from Clinton. So hypocritical. So….Clinton.

    Indeed!
    ==
    Racial Profiling?

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0410/Obama_seeks_to_reconnectyoung_people_AfricanAmerins_Latinos_and_women_for_2010.html?showall
    ==
    In the daily liberal do as I say not as I do

    http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/04/famed-environmental-wackos-building.html

    20,000 sq ft houses for enviro-wacos

    ==

    You can’t make this stuff up.

    Spitzer saying Cuomo is driven by politics

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/nyregion/25spitzer.html?hp

    ==

  • newfreedomblog

    This is an excellent review of “what did I miss”, but really should be “what does TIME.com refuse to report”.

  • freeinpa

    Profiling at Duke University. Will media notice?

    http://dukechronicle.com/article/ldoc-wristband-policy

  • grape_crush

    - Liar, liar, pants on fire / Your nose is longer than a telephone wire

    Krugman: “Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader, has been trying to stop reform with possibly the most dishonest argument ever made in the history of politics..”

    - The other Klein on ‘epistemic closure’.

    “…the counterargument some conservatives might offer would be that the New York Times and CBS News are liberal, but anyone arguing that those outlets are partisan or politicized in the way that Limbaugh is partisan and politicized is, well, sort of a walking example of epistemic closure.”

    - Meanwhile, in Afghanistan

    “Two months after the Marja offensive, Afghan officials acknowledge that the Taliban have in some ways retaken the momentum there…’We are still waiting to see the outcome in Marja,’ said Shaida Abdali, the deputy Afghan national security adviser. ‘If you are planning for operations in Kandahar, you must show success in Marja….’”

  • newfreedomblog

    One more “what did I miss”, is really the lack of work this Administration has done to create jobs. They have worked on every social justice program, and put job creation on the far reaches of the back burner.
    .
    I know the goal of Democrats is to create a bigger Federal Government, but do they really think the way they are doing this is going to go over at all with the public?
    .
    Yes the economy has retreated from the brink of total collaspe, but for most Americans they do not see any progress. They only see the billions being made from the spending of Trillions of tax dollars on the ineffective bailout, buyouts, stimulus programs and “cash for clunker” programs. But if you spend a trillion dollars, and you only see a few Billion as your return, are they not simply taking those Trillions of tax dollars and just moving the money from one pocket to the other?
    .
    I guess one thing is for sure, Obama’s promise to Joe the Plummer to redistribute the wealth is a reality now, and it does work. But, I ask you to ask yourself, have you benefited yet from wealth redistribution or are you still unemployed?

  • nflfoghorn

    Or, more accurately, what Time–unlike you–refuses to pull out of the toilet after wiping and post as fact.

  • michaelfury
  • freeinpa

    In fairness, you see much through the narrow twisted prism of liberalism.

  • freeinpa

    In full raging denial.

  • homerhk

    why do i bother responding to you at all? but here goes. The bailout was Bush II (albeit supported by then candidate Obama – and then candidate McCain). You praise the retreat from brink of total collapse so you must know that both the bailout and the stimulus are the cause for that retreat – so instead of focussing on the ‘return’ (although where you get your figures from…) focus on what you say would have been the consequences of not doing those two things, i.e. ‘collapse’. are we better off or worse off not having had the collapse that so many were predicting?

    And don’t forget the massive extension of benefits provided by the stimulus. There is a great story in the NY Mag article about Palin which encapsulates the utter lack of self-awareness in the tea partiers. It was the story of a man who spent his last unemployment check (a.k.a GOV’T takeover of poverty) on printing t-shirts with some ludicrous anti-Obama slogan to sell at tea party rallies. One might applaud the enterpreneurial nature of this act (if not the sentiment) but one also has to recognise that such entrepneurial action was only made possible by the stimulus.

  • kevin

    Glad to see you finally admit your outlook, freeinpa.

  • Ivy_B

    Interesting article by Halperin. I heard a discussion pm NPR of the many smaller accomplishments of the administration that have been ignored because of the unrelenting focus by the media on the process and the constant repeating of the negatives.

  • freeinpa

    “Or, more accurately, what Time–unlike you–refuses to pull out of the toilet after wiping and post as fact”

    Yes because as we all know the only truth is spoken by liberals who as a main tenet believe truth is relative.

  • freeinpa

    So the bailout worked and Bush should be credited which makes and Demos opening line “the situation we were handed” crap.

    The stimulus, on the other hand was promised to hold unemployment to 8%. It reached 10% and holding steady at 9.7%. So it failed and continues to fail.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    How about the rule of law a winner
    .
    Since the ‘Rule of law’ says that the bill is Unconstitutional as written I would suggest that declarations of victory are premature.
    .
    I’d also like to ask those who assert that they have nothing against Hispanic immigrants but only ‘illegals’ how do they suppose that current immigration laws get written in the first place?

  • newfreedomblog

    Go for it IvyB. Go ahead and talk about all the “smaller accomplishments of the administration that have been ignored”. What exactly are they? (with links to back up your claim of course).

  • nflfoghorn

    No, Freep, the truth is the truth. There’s the way you see it, the way I may see it, and the way it is (cue W Cronkite).

    Facts are facts. Example: The current President was born in Hawaii in August 1961. Why do folks on your side continue to lie that he was not (or at very least imply that he’s not a US citizen)?

    Folks like you lie so often some folks are impressed enought to believe them. It’s one thing to disagree with someone (as I did with Dubya). Another whole thing altogether to MSU in hopes that something sticks.

  • m0mentom0ri

    What did Freepy not understand?
    .
    “Will the media label these seditious racist, terro groups?”
    .
    When Al Sharpton shows up armed and advocating secession and using violent rhetoric, then yes, the media should and will label him as such.
    .
    “Nobody wins? How about the rule of law a winner”
    .
    30% of the population of AZ is hispanic. I hope AZ set aside a big pile of its non-existant budget to cover the wrongful arrest lawsuits. This is a poorly written law designed solely for the appeal of conservative nativists.
    .
    “I never had a job.”
    .
    If you’re a conservative, working for the government doesn’t count as working. I guess serving in the military now counts as ‘liberal welfare’. (That said, Gietner’s a tool and should be run out of town.)
    .
    Clinton, blah-blah-blah
    .
    Flashback to early 2000: “About 600 people were arrested last night near the World Bank and International Monetary Fund buildings as tension mounted on the eve of the spring meetings of the two international bodies, which protesters have pledged to shut down.”
    .
    “20,000 sq ft houses for enviro-wacos”
    .
    And if your doctor smokes, then you can ignore him when he says smoking is bad for you. Also, Al Gore is fat.
    .
    Spitzer blah blah Cuomo.
    .
    See also, Vitter, David; Craig, Larry; etc. At least Spitzer had the decency to step down when he disgraced himself and the office.

  • freeinpa

    Speaking of premature, I don’t recall having read anywhere, that the bill has in fact been declared unconstitutional. Bu then I don’t venture in to the looney left sites.

    ==
    I’d also like to ask those who assert that they have nothing against Hispanic immigrants but only ‘illegals’ how do they suppose that current immigration laws get written in the first place?

    That statement defies logic. Any law written to address crime targets the root cause in that area. Why does police set up breathalyzer checks near bars? Is that profiling? Does the police hater bar owners? No, statistically you find drunks coming out of bars not church.

  • freeinpa

    kevin And your wit remains fully entrenched at half and dim – wit.

  • newfreedomblog

    This is a goody (video) for people to lookat:
    “Obama’s National Security Advisor Tells Joke Depicting Jews as Greedy Merchants”.
    .
    http://www.breitbart.tv/obamas-national-security-advisor-tells-joke-depicting-jews-as-greedy-merchants
    .
    Now please tell me who it is that is acting more like Hitler’s SS / Nazi propaganda again? Didn’t Hitler’s Socialist Democratic Party (Nazi) first have to fight off the regular Socialist/Communist Party of Germany before Hitler finally prevailed with the Nazi Party?
    .
    I can provide links if anyone is curious.

  • grape_crush

    Pretty telling that freedumblog would take offense to a joke made about the Taliban.

  • Ivy_B

    Read the article by Halperin that Adam linked.
    .
    As to others, you can use the Google, but here is one from Fox News for the 100 Days.
    .
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/21/adviser-obamas-days-productive-fdr/

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “So the bailout worked and Bush should be credited which makes and Demos opening line “the situation we were handed” crap.”
    .
    Rusty,
    .
    If you think of a recession as the economy burning away money, Bush, under huge pressure, contained part of the fire.
    .
    Obama, with car industry, prevented another disaster.
    .
    The stimulus package is like the carpenter rebuilding the part of your home which was burnt down.
    .
    Although it was, apparently, too small to have as much impact or have as quick of an impact as we all wanted, it is the biggest reason we are in recovery.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    You know, I don’t recall any time Nazis told anti-Taliban jokes or described Jews as forgiving of insults, gentle and level headed.
    .
    The mantra of being a “real” American is parallel to being a “true Ayrian” but less so.
    .
    Please tell me when Democrats and/or liberals and/or progressives got involved in claiming America was a superior culture.
    .
    The joke tells of a kind, bright anti-violent Jewish man who gets a laugh at his enemies expense. Now, I am not Jewish, but, I wouldn’t mind if somebody put me in the position of the merchant.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Freeinpa,
    .
    Once again, it always helps to make sense.
    .
    Non-students are not allowed to go into particular parts of the Duke campus.
    .
    White non-students and black non-students both are forbidden from entering parts of the campus.
    .
    Black and white students are allowed so long as they wear a wrist band.
    .
    I guess that, since Duke is very hard to get into that it is discrimination against stupid people and, as a stupid person you are upset.
    .
    I guess we should dumb down a our best universities to make it all into watching Fox news and having every single answer to every exam be “Fox is right”.

  • Ivy_B

    Greg Sargent shows how the public really feels about the proposed bank fund that the Obama administration is so willing to jettison.

    The new Washington Post/ABC News poll is rightly getting a lot of attention this morning because it finds that a huge majority backs financial reg reform, with Americans trusting Obama over Republicans on the issue by a lopsided amount.

    But there’s also this interesting number buried in the internals:

    Please tell me whether you support or oppose each of these items. Do you feel that way strongly or somewhat?

    b. Requiring large banks and other financial companies to put money into a fund that would cover the cost of taking over and breaking up any large financial company that fails and threatens the broader economy:

    Support: 53%
    Strongly 27%
    Somewhat 26%

    Oppose: 42%
    Strongly 24%
    Somewhat 18%

    This is, of course, the provision that Mitch McConnell has claimed will lead to “endless taxpayer bailouts.” Yet it’s supported by a majority, 53%, with 27% supporting it strongly.

    Given that the public strongly dislikes bailouts, the fact that a majority supports creating this fund suggests that any efforts to link it to bailouts haven’t worked all that well.

    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/poll-majority-backs-so-called-permanent-bailout-fund/

  • newfreedomblog

    There was a 60 minutes show last night on TV which showed a former radical Muslim who is now challenging the sterotypes the Taliban has made out of the western Democracies and Israel.
    .
    Unfortunately, and not surprisingly, grapey and Sartor both fail to understand that this joke told by Obama’s National Security Advisor yet agains depicts Jews as “greedy merchants” who won’t even give a thirsty nomad in the desert a drink of water unless he first jumps through multiple hoops and buys other things from them first before quenching his thirst. Such a model of decent human treatment contained within this joke, no? Exactly an example of the Nazi-era depiction of Jews before the holocaust.
    .
    I am glad I had this opportunity to show the both of you how fully racist you both are or in the very least naive and stupid.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    freeinpa,
    .
    “Speaking of premature, I don’t recall having read anywhere, that the bill has in fact been declared unconstitutional. Bu then I don’t venture in to the looney left sites.”
    .
    For a person who shouts “unconstitutional” a the drop of a hat you do not know the constitution at all.:
    .
    ““ The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
    .
    Now, if you have basic literacy, police pulling over or stopping Latinos on the street and demanding documentation does violate this.
    .
    Of course you are warped by ideology and can not see anything outside of your own world view.

  • freeinpa

    “Why do folks on your side continue to lie that he was not (or at very least imply that he’s not a US citizen)”

    Obama’s citizenship is not at the top of my list of issues with him. But since you brought it up, it seems that it would be a very simple way to truly end the issue and forever silence the critics: have Obama along with the state of Hawaii produce the long form birth certificate. Seems to be a simple solution that Obama and Hawaii keep trying to dodge.
    ==
    “Folks like you lie so often”

    Just when have I lied. It seems that the rabid left when you are not calling conservatives racists just accuse anyone with an opposing opinion a liar. The biggest liar is you– you constantly lie to yourself!
    ==
    “When Al Sharpton shows up armed and advocating secession and using violent rhetoric”

    Did Rush or Beck ever show up anywhere armed advocating succession. Yet the left led by crackpot journalists like Joe Klein accuse them of sedition.

    But speaking of Sharpton, does “no justice no peace” sound familiar? Seems to be calling for violence.

    ==
    “30% of the population of AZ is hispanic.”

    And this means what? If you are a big enough constituency you need not obey laws. Over half of the people think some civil rights will be lost but 70% approve of the bill.
    ==
    “I guess serving in the military now counts as ‘liberal welfare”

    This is the only time liberals consider the military part of the government. It’s usually just a punch line and consistently the only government program liberals will ever agree to a budget cut. So spare me the crap.

    ==
    “And if your doctor smokes, then you can ignore him when he says smoking is bad for you. Also, Al Gore is fat.”

    It’s called hypocrisy and the liberals excel at it. Algore is not only fat but he runs around the world in a private jet wearing his chicken little costume while his house in TN dims the power grid telling us about he evil of global warming.

    It’s like well telling us taxes are good and you have an administration and Taxing Writing Ctm chair not paying any. Rules for thee not me.

    ==
    “See also, Vitter, David; Craig, Larry; etc. At least Spitzer had the decency to step down when he disgraced himself and the office”

    Spitzer was forced out and I would guess Vutter et al are only following the example of that great statesman Bill Clinyon.

  • freeinpa

    patrickturd

    “, against unreasonable searches and seizures”

    It would seem it all swings on “unreasonable”. It is a solid guess that the illegal immigrants are of Hispanic origin it may not be all that unreasonable. You may not like it and no doubt scream “profiling”..

    Which brings up another wonderful liberal blindside. What is affirmative action if not profiling? So all of that should be illegal too right?

  • freeinpa

    Non-students are not allowed to go into particular parts of the Duke campus.

    Isn’t that profiling and discriminatory? It is tax-exempt and receives federal funding for all of the school.

    And sorry the Fuqua School lets me in there regularly!

  • freeinpa

    :Obama, with car industry, prevented another disaster.”

    What disaster? Keeping the UAW in business?

    So why in this new found religion with Dems are they not considering Chrysler and GM to be in the too bog to fail category that must now be micro-managed by government?

  • apr2563

    Ivy: I was blown away that Halprin had a positive column about Obama. I think many things have been done executively to reverse the regressive policies of the Bush era. It takes a while to get all of the Federal Departments moving in the right direction. It is done quietly and efficiently. More to do.

  • grape_crush

    …grapey and Sartor both fail to understand that this joke…
    .
    No, dear dumblog…This joke is a modification of one that’s been told over and over again.

    A man is crawling through the Sahara desert when he is approached by another man riding on a camel. As the rider approaches, the crawling man whispers through his parched lips, “Water … please … can you give … water …”

    “I’m sorry,” replies the man on the camel, “I don’t have any water with me. But I’d be delighted to sell you a necktie.”

    “Necktie?” whispers the man. “I need water!”

    “They’re only four dollars apiece.”

    “I need water.”

    “Okay, okay, two for seven dollars.”

    “Please! I need water!” the man exclaims.

    “I don’t have any water, all I have are ties,” replies the salesman, as he heads off into the distance.

    By now the man has lost all track of time, crawling through the desert seemingly for days. Finally, nearly dead, with clothes tattered and skin peeling under the relentless sun, he comes upon a restaurant. Summoning his last bit of strength, he staggers to the door and confronts the head waiter.

    “Water … can I get … water,” the dying man pleads.

    “I’m sorry, sir. Our dress code requires a tie” replies the waiter.

    Exactly an example of the Nazi-era depiction of Jews before the holocaust.
    .
    Nope, wrong again dumblog.
    .
    I am glad I had this opportunity to show the both of you…
    .
    I am both flattered and disturbed that the direction of your spite, lunacy, mendacity, and as5hattery in general towards the commenters here (myself included) is such an important part of your day.
    .
    Seriously, unless you’re getting paid to pass on the latest daily manufactured faux outrage from the wingnut blogosphere, you must have a sad, sad life, freedumblog.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Isn’t that profiling and discriminatory? It is tax-exempt and receives federal funding for all of the school.”
    .
    You get a tax credit for you home.
    .
    Should I be able to have access to your kitchen to make myself breakfast there?
    .
    (Trust me, even if I could, that is the last thing I would want to do.)
    .
    100% of universities have restricted areas only for students just as 100% of businesses have restricted areas only for employees.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “What is affirmative action if not profiling? So all of that should be illegal too right?”
    .
    No.
    .
    Profiling is when law enforcement harasses an ethnic group.
    .
    Affirmative action is giving a 5 point bonus on the New York City Police exam, for example, since the mostly black school districts are usually awful and making up for a disadvantage.
    .
    Is pulling over a Latino in Arizona making up for your disadvantage?
    .
    Does affirmative action involve people being arrested or having unreasonable search and seizure?
    .
    No.
    .
    Nothing gets taken away in affirmative action. About 20% of all Americans are qualified for the compensation on exams and the like.

  • freeinpa

    So you are singling out a group based on race to give an advantage.

    Or there is a company operating in an area where 12% of the men are black. The company hires a non-black and is sued because the company on has 10.8762% blacks in the company. Is that racial profiling as well.

    People aren’t arrested just sued and instead of hiring who they would prefer they need to follow racial profiling and that’s criminal.

    This is just one example of the tortures of the dam that liberals go through. Any logical point going form A to B has the wheels fall off the wagon quickly.

  • freeinpa

    patrickturd:

    http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/26/news/economy/NABE_survey/

    Seems your belief about the stimulus is another liberal truth that doesn’t pass the test of reality.

  • freeinpa

    I am sure even you can determine a difference between receiving a tax credit (on your own money) and the outright handing out of taxpayer cash to universities.

    There is no university that has areas that are 100% access to students only!

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Or there is a company operating in an area where 12% of the men are black. The company hires a non-black and is sued because the company on has 10.8762% blacks in the company. Is that racial profiling as well.

    People aren’t arrested just sued and instead of hiring who they would prefer they need to follow racial profiling and that’s criminal.”
    .
    You, obviously do not know the first thing about civil rights law.
    .
    The plaintiff has to show by a perponderance of the evidence that the one and only reason that the person of color, woman or person of a protected group was not hired, not promoted or fired was due to their being a part of that protected group.
    .
    So, you’d better have a stellar work history, stellar work performance, no tardiness – basically be an ideal employee but overqualified for your job – and be competing with somebody who is unqualified before you can expect to win that suit.
    .
    Basically, to win in a court of law, the plaintiff has to show that the employer is a hard core racist.
    .
    Affirmative action is for companies with government contracts and government agencies which, when highly similarly candidates apply, they must give it to the candidate of the protected group. If the person of the protected group is less qualified, such that it is not a tie between them, it can and will go to the person of the majority or non-protected group.
    .
    Voluntary affirmative action programs are not regulated.
    .
    If you do not like affirmative action, then do not do business with the government.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “I am sure even you can determine a difference between receiving a tax credit (on your own money) and the outright handing out of taxpayer cash to universities.”
    .
    Yes and outside of student loans and the government sponsoring particular research projects, they do not get any.they do not get federal grants at random
    .
    “There is no university that has areas that are 100% access to students only!”
    .
    Dormitories, classrooms, cafeterias… most of the campus.
    .
    Do you think you could walk onto the campus an eat lunch at Yale Law school?
    .
    How about the University of Virginia law school?
    .
    Most campuses have most of their space used only for students and faculty. Only tiny bits are open to the general public.
    .
    These aren’t public parks.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    Freeinpa,
    .
    I wrote:
    .
    “Although it was, apparently, too small to have as much impact or have as quick of an impact as we all wanted, it is the biggest reason we are in recovery.”
    .
    Your link says:
    .
    “NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — The recovery is picking up steam as employers boost payrolls, but economists think the government’s stimulus package and jobs bill had little to do with the rebound, according to a survey released Monday.
    .
    In latest quarterly survey by the National Association for Business Economics, the index that measures employment showed job growth for the first time in two years…”
    .
    You’ve proven my point.
    .
    “What disaster? Keeping the UAW in business?

    So why in this new found religion with Dems are they not considering Chrysler and GM to be in the too bog to fail category that must now be micro-managed by government?”
    .
    GM and Chrysler are too big to fail.
    .
    I don’t know who was telling you otherwise.
    .
    It might be those voices in your head.
    .
    There is medication for that once you start seeing a psychiatrist.

blog comments powered by Disqus