Two Al-Qaeda Leaders Killed In Iraq, Vice President Biden Takes A Victory Lap

Vice President Joe Biden took no questions Monday during his brief Briefing Room appearance at the White House. He was there to drive a message, not discuss. Iraqi security forces, with U.S. military support, had killed the two most senior leaders of Al Qaeda in Iraq, operational leader Abu Ayyub al-Masri and spiritual leader Abu Omar al-Baghdadi. “Their deaths are potentially devastating blows to Al Qaeda in Iraq,” Biden said. “The Iraqis led this operation. And it was based on intelligence that the Iraqis themselves developed.”

The killings may hold more symbolic value for the Iraqi government, and the White House, than strategic value. Al Qaeda in Iraq has long been a weakened body, far less concerning to U.S. intelligence leaders than other Al Qaeda groups in Yemen and Pakistan. On Sunday on Fox News, Gen. Ray Odierno, the U.S. Commander in Iraq, described the Iraqi group like this:

First off, Al Qaeda continues to be significantly degraded. We’ve got to put this in perspective, Chris. First quarter fiscal year ’10 was the lowest number of incidents we’ve had in a quarter, the lowest number of high-profile attacks, the lowest number of indirect fire attacks, the lowest number of civilian casualties, the lowest number of U.S. force casualties, the lowest number of Iraqi security force casualties. So the direction continues to be headed in the right way. Yes, they are still capable of conducting attacks against innocent civilians, but the Iraqis have rejected the ideology of Al Qaeda. They are rejecting Al Qaeda as a whole inside of Iraq. We continue to make progress against them. There is still work to be done. There will still be bad days ahead of us, but it’s becoming more and more difficult.

It is notable, however, that the White House brought out Biden to trumpet the killings of al-Masri and al-Baghdadi. In the wake of health care reform’s passage, the White House has been far more aggressive in driving its messages of the day. Just last week, the President dominated national news for three days with his signature foreign policy initiative, global nuclear security. Obama immediately shifted to financial regulatory reform, bringing Republicans to a meeting at the White House, and then Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner appeared in the briefing room, for a rare appeal to the press for more aggressive reporting.

And the stuff ahead of us now is derivatives, it’s “too big to fail,” it’s complicated stuff — okay?  But make sure that you bring the same level of exposure and the spotlight on the choices ahead, because we — I think we all have an interest in resisting the efforts that are going to be made — and they’re going to come still — to weaken, to exempt, to carve people out of those basic protections.

Just two months ago, during the debate over health care, the White House was effectively under siege. Almost all the news coverage was news coverage about the legislative process of health care, not a story the White House wanted to talk about much. All has changed. The White House is back in the driver’s seat, shaping and directing the news of the day.

Related Topics: Al Qaeda, financial reform, timothy geithner, Joe Biden
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • bobell

    Without regard to the strategic consequences, it strikes me as unseemly to take a “victory lap” to celebrate the death of a fellow human being — no matter how odious that human being may have been. When Moses made the mistake of exulting at the death of the Egyptians when the Red Sea closed behind the departing Israelites, God reprimanded him for taking delight in the deaths of his fellow children of God. The strategic consequences of such killings are one thing, but let’s not lose the human dimension.
    .
    I wonder how many survivors of the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing took delight in the death of Timothy McVeigh. One can argue that the world is well rid of McVeigh without taking that last step and actually celebrating. The same is true of these two evil men. They were part of God’s creation, and although we have no need to mourn them, neither should we dance on their graves.
    .
    Or could it be that “victory lap” is MS’s phrase and Biden actually showed the good grace to discuss the political and military implications of these two deaths without showing personal pleasure with the event? Let’s hope so.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    “Victory lap” is certainly my phrase, not Biden’s. But it is also an accurate description. He came to the briefing room to highlight the killings as a sign of progress in Iraq, one that reflects positively on both for Iraqis and the U.S. policy.

  • nflfoghorn

    I like your second paragraph. Of course, Dick and his daughter would say that BO’s still being too weak on dead terrorists.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    It’s worth remebering that the phrase “Al Qaeda in Iraq” was coined until October 2004, well after the US invasion.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_Iraq

    While we may be relieved that two notorious insurgents in Iraq have been dealt with, it’s important to remember that our having shifted gears from Afghanistan to Iraq significantly delayed our efforts against Al Qaeda in the first place.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    was = wasn’t

  • newfreedomblog

    Joe “Let’s divide Iraq into 3 distinct areas” Biden?
    .
    Does Joe even know the difference between Al Qaeda, Shia and Sunni?
    .
    Next thing we shall see from this Administration is a slogan, “Surges work!!”

  • nflfoghorn

    Don’t start, Rust-eze. You know good and darn well your boy B[l]ush created a “surge” when things were going poorly in Iraq. You’re worse than one who has no credibility — you’re in negative credibility territory.

  • theotherjimmyolson

    And of course MS you end up talking about process.

  • apr2563

    Victory dance? Is that what you called it when John Ashcroft would rush out every chance he could get touting some new terrorist plot foiled. Usually, it would turn out to be nothing. Or the Dept of Homeland Security would cry wolf, brag how they thwarted another attack, and jack up the color coded warning system. Tom Ridge admitted this was done for political reasons.
    .
    MS, why do you think you have to have a dramatic but inflammatory headline on every post?

  • tstar3

    “It is notable, however, that the White House brought out Biden to trumpet the killings of al-Masri and al-Baghda

    “Um. Is Biden not the point man for Iraq? Really a simple Google search would have done you a world of good MS

  • acameronw

    “Does Joe even know the difference between Al Quida, Shia and Sunni?”

    I think I can say with some certainty the answer is yes. Unless you’re referring to Joe the Plumber, which wouldn’t surprise me one bit.

    The Vice President went to great pains to point out that this was in large part an Iraqi operation, which would seem to be in line with the previous administration’s stated policy of building up the Iraqi Army’s capabilities so that American forces could draw down.* So now what are you complaining about?

    To paraphrase Rep. Alan Grayson, if the Obama Administration brought about world peace, you’d jump on him for hurting the defense industry.

    (* A plan that would have gone a lot more smoothly if the Bush Administration hadn’t disbanded the Iraqi Army without any thought to the consequences.)

  • newfreedomblog

    Oh yes nflfloghorn, I distinctly remember also when Biden said “the Surge won’t work!!” Jumping up and down like a mexican jumping bean no less.
    .
    Now the real question is why doesn’t dear Baracky take credit for this? Doesn’t he want his fellow Muslims to feel ill-will towards him? Put the Catholic white dude out in front of the cameras and press to take credit for killing a couple more Islamic Terrorists?
    .
    One smart move I will give Obama, picking a stooge as his Vice President. He did get that choice right on.

  • afguy

    Ummm…. now how many Al-Qaeda leaders is this we’ve “offed” to date?
    .
    Didn’t someone recently publish a study that showed that “beheading” religious movements doesn’t actually accomplish a whole lot, when it comes to dimishing the popularity of the movement?
    .
    Plus, as has already been pointed out, in Iraq this group really isn’t our main problem. Given the presence of secret prisons run by the Iraqi government, we need to be at least as concerned with the actions of our supposed “friends”.

  • kevin

    They have no shame, so they might say that. But seeing how the Obama administration has killed more terrorists in its first year than the Bush administration did in the last four of its term in office, they’d be hard pressed to do so.
    .
    They’ll probably say killing terrorists is a bad thing. I mean, whatever Obama does is bad in their eyes, so that’ll probably be the case.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    More evil has been extiguished. As a result innoccent lives will be spared. It indeed calls for celebration!

  • afguy

    Stooge, Rusty? Coming from someone whose party picked Sarah Freaking Palin as his VP running mate, that’s rich…

  • newfreedomblog

    Poor April2563, still living in her glory years of the past. Life sure does suck, doesn’t it April? When in doubt, just blame it on Bush. You wackos deserve someone like Chavez, I do hope you get your wish someday. Where can we send a one-way ticket to Venezuela for you April?
    .
    And another episode of stupid answers for stupid people asking stupid questions;
    .

    “MS, why do you think you have to have a dramatic but inflammatory headline on every post?”

    .
    Answer: Because he can! DOH!!

  • apr2563

    newrusty: Another fact based post full of uplifting discussion. Thanks.

  • Matt

    So the GOP will need to tell me how this administration is “endangering” the safety of Americans by killing more Al Qaeda leaders in a year than the Bush regime did in eight.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • nflfoghorn

    Don’t you understand, Matt – evil begets evil! Evil is as evil does! Two sides of the same coin!
    .
    Any more Rust-eze logic?

  • http://www.stevebeste.com Steve Beste

    The Obama administration has learned one key lesson from its predecessor. The Bush administration always got the #2 guy in Al-Qaeda.

    Obama gets the leaders.

    So now the Number 2s are the new Number One’s. Sounds like The Prisoner.

  • nflfoghorn

    He’s going all Number Six on us :)

  • rmorris101

    What’s the matter? Can’t you tell the difference between Number 1 and Number 2?

  • textee

    You have to love the fact that two anti-military, leftist dumb @sses (Obama and Biden) and Time magazine are taking a victory lap over something they had absolutely nothing to do with other than making such killings more difficult. In fact, if Obama, Biden and Time magazine had their way, Iraq would have always remained a zone safe for al Qaeda and other terrorists. Furthermore, once America was committed to closing with and destroyiing the enemy in Iraq, Obama, Biden and Time magazine were calling for America’s unconditional surrender to America’s terrorist enemies in Iraq. Take a “victory lap” around that fact, Time magazine.

  • maverick2k9

    Whatever happened to those color coded warning system?
    .
    Bush Jr must have taken it with him when he left the WH… along with his crayon set.

  • freekeir

    taking out leaders may not immediately diminish a groups’ popularity, but it does cause massive chaos within the group whilst factions fight to install a new leader. And these groups aren’t like neighborhood watch meets where everyone can sit together and vote on a leader, these guys live in holes spread out across the country, and they’re as violent with one another as they are with everyone.

  • justmy02cents

    “The Vice President went to great pains to point out that this was in large part an Iraqi operation, which would seem to be in line with the previous administration’s stated policy of building up the Iraqi Army’s capabilities so that American forces could draw down.* So now what are you complaining about?

    To paraphrase Rep. Alan Grayson, if the Obama Administration brought about world peace, you’d jump on him for hurting the defense industry.

    (* A plan that would have gone a lot more smoothly if the Bush Administration hadn’t disbanded the Iraqi Army without any thought to the consequences.)”
    .
    Acameronw,
    .
    This is a large assumption on your part….We cannot possibly know for certain, the effect of leaving the Baathist members INTACT in the national police force and military….
    .
    Personally, it seems to have been a coin toss…damned if you do and damned if you don’t.
    .
    For you to somehow turn this into the definitive example of BDS is purely subjective. But very typical of leftmedia Bush haters.

  • theotherjimmyolson

    What?

  • cp4ab0lishm3nt

    There is no victory lap for the V. President. He came out to deliver significant development in Iraq on behalf of the President who was in California to campaign for Boxer.
    I am confused as to whether the remark, “the victory lap,” is meant as a sarcasm or a compliment, but either way its negative. The Americans, Iraqis and various other Alliance forces have already depleted funds and sacrificed lives for nearly 8 years of this campaign and now its only beginning to see cooperation and trusts.
    I suggest not to ‘hoot’ or trumpet on these kinds of information, whether its positive or negative, and only discuss it maturely or perhaps in an academic manner.

blog comments powered by Disqus