Fillibusters, Fights, Fundraising: We’re in an Election Season

This morning Washington woke up to reports on how the White House was going to go after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s opposition to the financial reregulation bill. “McConnell’s arguments that the Democrat’s plan for Wall Street reform will perpetuate bailouts is pure fantasy cooked up by Frank Luntz in a right wing focus group - and bears no reality to the legislation or Mitch McConnell and the Republican Party’s longtime efforts to shill for Wall Street and its lobbyists,” a Democratic Party source told The Hill newspaper. “If Mitch McConnell wants to look foolish and to look like the bag man for big banks that he and his colleagues are – we’re glad to help.” McConnell is being “a little silly,” scolded New York Times writer John Harwood. Would the bill perpertrate taxpayer bailouts as McConnell alleges? Not true, FDIC Chair Sheila Bair told American Banker. Nobel laureate Paul Krugman called McConnell “truly shameless.” Mitch McConnell, mocked the Huffington Post, is George Orwell of 1984 Big Brother fame, reincarnated. The DNC has sent out 22 McConnell press releases in the last three days.

Dem operatives now have a lot more cannon fodder to work with. This afternoon, the 41 Senate Republicans sent Senate Majorty Leader Harry Reid a letter informing him of their unified opposition to the bill. “We simply cannot ask the American taxpayer to continue to subsidize this ‘too big to fail” policy,’ the letter read. ” We must ensure that Wall Street no longer believes or relies on Main Street to bail them out.  Inaction is not an option.  However, it is imperative that what we do does not worsen the current economic climate or codify the circumstances that led to the last financial crisis.”

Reid needs at least one Republican vote to prevent a filibuster and he had been hoping to flip Maine Senator Susan Collins, who’d been wavering. Instead, this afternoon, both parties dug in for a fight — something both sides see as having political silver linings. Republicans are hoping to fire up a base sick of massive deficit spending. Dems are looking to portray McConnell and the GOP as more on the side of Wall Street fat cat bankers than the little guy on Main Street (President Obama got in on the action this afternoon saying he’d veto any legislation that doesn’t regulate deriviatives). Only time will tell who wins this spin war with independents, but both sides are eagerly licking their chops in anticipation of a good fashioed dragged out partisan battle. Heck, both sides are already fundraising off of it. And what does this mean for the actual bill, which would impose tougher regulations on Wall Street in the wake of the financial crisis and create a risk abritrator to hopefully prevent something like this from ever happening again? It’s probably dead for the year unless one side backs down and reaches out in earnest for a bipartisan deal — and in an election year, that’s not looking too likely.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: filibuster, financial reregulation, Mitch McConnell, 2012 Election, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Compare reporting:

    JNS above vs:

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/mcconnell_doesnt_have_the_vote.html

    McConnell looks to have gotten 41 Republicans onto a softer form of his letter. Now it says that Republicans oppose the bill without changes, but there’s no promise of a filibuster. You can read the letter here.

    Who do we think is drawing a clearer picture of the actual state of play?

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. I hope you’re having LOTS of fun there. If you have to stay longer thanks to Jindal’s volcano, would you plan to help Catherine cover the political race to count as “work” (and thus put hotel, meals, drinks, and souvenirs on TIME’s dime)? I don’t know if Ireland, Holland, etc. are out of plume coverage (but you would!).
    .
    As for the R’s opposition, let it happen! I dare them to filibuster in favor of Wall Street during a crappy economy and high job losses. The public – and many Tea Partiers? – would love that (not!). Do you think our friend lovely KT will finally get her wish for a Real Filibuster™? I hope so. How are the British (non-Murdoch) media types covering our finance reform there? Thanks for your thoughts and enjoy the weekend, Jay.

  • FlownOver

    What’s the over/under on how long it takes Ben Nelson to sell out?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    The party of no at it again. All they want to do is shut down the government.

  • acameronw

    At last, the real leader of the Republican Party is revealed at last. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Frank Luntz. He laid out the plan to oppose financial reform a while ago, and McConnell & Co. have adopted it hook, line and sinker (emphasis on the sinker). The fact that it’s a complete misrepresentation of the bill doesn’t faze them in the least. What’s remarkable about this is that (at least so far) all the Senate Republicans have been drinking the Kool-Aid. Do they really think the Democrats running for against them for their Senate seats this year aren’t going to be able to turn this against them? Even the Tea Partiers ought to be able to see through this. (I know that sounds condescending, but anyone who thinks Dick Armey is a populist has it coming.) If this goes like I think it just might, the next time I hear Frank Luntz’s voice after November it’s going to be asking “Do you want fries with that?”

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Alright, 10 words time. We’ll do a double feature: first 10 words says McConnell is a lying pig, second 10 says the first 10 prove he’s in the pocket of Big Banks. If you have that, you can drag this all the way to November and slaughter Republicans.

  • deconstructiva

    I guess they forgot what happened when Clinton called Gingrich’s bluff and let if happen. Why did Newt whine over his AF1 seat? It’s closer to the potty. Did he get a window or aisle seat? Maybe Obama will make Boehner! sit in the john the entire flight to work on his orange makeup. Does AF1 have an elevator (some fancy planes do)? McConnell can stay there and keep reporters away.

  • Art Pepper

    Republicans are hoping to fire up a base sick of massive deficit spending.

    I guess the fact that this literally makes no sense is not an issue.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Sad but true.

    Not only is Conventional Wisdom often seriously misguided. But large tracts of America don’t even pay enough attention to understand Conventional Wisom.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Maybe better to be caught in half a lie (the difference between loan and expenditure), a semantics lie (structured selloff rather than bailout), and glazing over a thousand details voters won’t notice than let Obama have a win against banks before the midterms

  • grape_crush

    It’s probably dead for the year unless one side backs down and reaches out in earnest for a bipartisan deal…

    The GOP has rejected the opportunity to do just that.

    “We had an opportunity to pass out a bill out of our committee in a bipartisan way, and then stand on the Senate floor and hold hands and say that we would keep amendments that were unnecessary and improper from coming onto this bill,” Corker said. “Instead of that, it’s been decided that we are going to try to negotiate now…

    “I think it’s going to be far more difficult now that this has passed out of committee … I think we have made a very, very large mistake, and I regret that.”

    Banking committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) told HuffPost that “what [Corker] said was his Republican leadership abandoned him.”

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/25/bob-corker-republican-on_n_512600.html

  • shepherdwong

    “Republicans are hoping to fire up a base sick of massive deficit spending. Dems are looking to portray McConnell and the GOP as more on the side of Wall Street fat cat bankers than the little guy on Main Street… Only time will tell who wins this spin war with independents…”
    .
    Please explain what constitutes the Democrats’ “spin” in this particular war, Jay Newton-Small. We know that Mitch McConnell and the rest of the Republicans are lying their asses off per Frank Luntz’s instructions (an accidental omission on your part. I’m sure), so how are Democrats practicing similar “spin”. Surely it can’t be “McConnell and the GOP as more on the side of Wall Street fat cat bankers than the little guy on Main Street”, because everyone with eyes and a brain knows that is true. Or have you just shat out a giant steaming pile of false equivalence on your readers?

  • hippooath


    The DNC has sent out 22 McConnell press releases in the last three days.

    Dem operatives now have a lot more cannon fodder to work with. This afternoon, the 41 Senate Republicans sent Senate Majorty Leader Harry Reid a letter informing him of their unified opposition to the bill. “We simply cannot ask the American taxpayer to continue to subsidize this ‘too big to fail” policy,’ the letter read. ” We must ensure that Wall Street no longer believes or relies on Main Street to bail them out. Inaction is not an option. However, it is imperative that what we do does not worsen the current economic climate or codify the circumstances that led to the last financial crisis.”
    .
    I’m usually not into the whole kick the oppositions @ss since we need a sane, pragmatic opposition to guard from poor legislation. Just look at the democrats spineless attitude during GWB and the kind of ‘hold my hand’ attitude during the HC debate. It always leads to fundamental flawed legislation if you cater to a opposition that won’t work with you anyway.
    .
    But
    .
    I hope DNC holds firm, find a easy language to smack GOP around with and slaughter the opposition on this. Keep the strong legislation because we can’t afford weak sauce HC bills if we also don’t regulate our system so we end up here again. There’s no quick recovery in sight – so if this boils over and implode in another couple of years we’re economically and historically toast.
    .
    I want GOP to hurt over their false rethoric and outright lies. I want their pandering to the ignorant ‘don’t give a sh!t’ masses that believe this swill come back and haunt them big time.
    .
    I might not like the crawl to center diluted weak bills that costs more than they have too – but at least the democrats tried to accomplish something. Unlike the eternal gang of no.
    .
    If GOP want to jump in lockstep and try to gain political power by falsehood on the expense of my future, I want that jump to take them over the cliff. The company that I work for almost went under and they’re still very shaky. It will not survive another downturn. It will be the direct consequence of the finance markets game with our tax money and the consequence of GOP short term policy to water down and destroy much needed regulation.
    .
    If they chose to act like babies and not as a intellectually honest opposition that will come up with their own set of solutions, I want them to be delegated to the dust bin. If anything, the only thing I’d like them to start over is their brand of politics. Out with the garbage that’s left – throw it out with the centrist corporatists – make induviduals the cornerstone of our constitution and not corporations.
    .
    Let us, the people prosper through a free and innoative market and get rid of the rulework of loopholes that allows corporations through our politicians to fleace us. And for Pete sake teach the tea party what the frack socialism is. Because it makes my skin burn when fringe nutters drag political science through the unintelligent slop they substitute real knowledge for.
    .
    May this be GOPs Waterloo – cause they deserve it. And I bet 10 dollars that most of GOP and their rubes don’t know what Waterloo was and the 10 years that lead up to it.

  • textee

    Was this press release written by the Democrat party for Jay Newton-Small or was it written by Jay Newton-Small for the Democrat party?

  • hippooath

    “Was this press release written by the Democrat party for Jay Newton-Small or was it written by Jay Newton-Small for the Democrat party?”
    .
    Textee – simple question – do you defend GOP’s lies?

  • jefflz

    The Republicans are the spokespeople for the big banks and brokerage firms just like they are the spokespersons for the big insurance companies and corporations that opposed the health care reform this country so desperately needs. There is nothing new here. The “Party of No” is the party of “no” to the American People and “yes” to Big Business. McConnell and his colleagues are in the pocket of the big banks. Anyone surprised?

  • eclecticman1

    I am very surprised. I thought about 7-8 Republican senators were going to vote for a bill limiting the chances of another financial meltdown. Now, they are going to fight for Wall Street and the big banks in order to make sure that at some point we can go through all of this again? This simply doesn’t make sense. They are handing their heads to the Democrats.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    You sure that isn’t “hook, line and STINKER”?

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    The Dems had better get a backbone on this. I don’t want another watered down bill the way HC was. We should have had single payer, or a public option at the very least, instead we got the insurance companies guaranteed another 30million + customers and very little legislation to keep them in line.
    .
    I am sick and tired of hearing the Repubs say they have “common sense solutions” but don’t bother to tell us what they are.
    .
    Chances are, the Repubs are hoping the economy takes a downturn before the election’; they will blame it on Obama, but in reality it will be their fault for blocking this bill.

  • steveeyes

    ——————————–
    GOP PLATFORM
    ——————————–

    - protect the wealthy

    - legislate for the wealthy

    - make the free market work for the wealthy

    – give tax breaks to the wealthy

    - lie to middle class

    - scare middle class

    – say no to legislation for middle class – scream socialism for middle class legislation while promoting legislation for the wealthy as being good for the economy. Yea, right! We saw under Bush who it was good for.

    – use murdoch empire (fox news, radio talk, wall street journal) to spread their lies.

    - continue Bush trickle down economic policy — remember the Bush trickle down economics – give the wealthy tax break and it will trickle down into jobs – yea, right – it trickled down to their greedy pockets while they got away with not paying their fair share.

    - scream tax increase by Democrats – when in reality Obama wants Bush tax cuts to expire, tax those making over 250,000 year and capital gains. Under Bush, there were hundreds who made millions via capital gains and did not pay a dime in tax. I wonder what middle class families are more worried about, paying their mortgage or capital gain tax? If I made a million, I would gladly pay my fair share of tax. The GOP, Republican Franchise for the Wealthy, will lie to middle class but continue to protect the status quo for their wealthy contributors.

    What has a Republican done for middle class lately other than lie, obstruct and use fear. If you believe that Republicans are looking out for middle class interests, I have a bridge to nowhere I will sale you or you get your source of lies from Fox news only.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I agree. I’m never worried about paying taxes. The stats show that something like 47% (?) of Americans don’t pay any income tax. I’d like to know what percentage of that are millionaires.

blog comments powered by Disqus