Dems Gearing Up for Tough Health Care Fight This Fall

The Democratic National Committee has already pledged to spend $50 million on congressional elections this year. And now Ben Smith gets word that the White House will devote a senior aide to selling health care full time. Which senior aide will take up this responsibility isn’t yet known, but presumably they will do some of what was handled by Linda Douglass, the former ABC News reporter who handled communications for the White House Office of Health Reform. She recently announced she’s leaving her post.

That the DNC and White House are making these announcements conveys two things. One, that the party now realizes health reform is not going to sell itself. It’s not going to become instantly popular, even with the immediate benefits Democratic leaders have been touting. Second, the announcements are messages to vulnerable congressional Democrats that the party and White House are taking threats to their seats seriously and plan to devote lots of resources to help mitigate expected losses in the House and Senate come November.

Democrats are trying mightily to focus the news media and public’s attention on financial reform and it remains to be seen how central a role health care will play this fall. But as long as health care continues be divisive, my guess is it will continue to be a favorite topic for Republicans. This fall, will Democrats run from the issue and try hard to talk about other issues, like financial reform? Or will they chose instead to emphasize the benefits of health reform, hoping they can change some minds among voters? District and state polling will help determine the strategy for each race.

One other bit of health care personnel news I’ve yet to mention is about Jon Kingsdale. Earlier this week, he announced he’s leaving his post as head of the Massachusetts health insurance exchange. The timing of his departure is noteworthy. The Department of Health and Human Services will need lots more staff in the coming years to implement the health reform law and then keep things running. Kingsdale would be an obvious choice for a senior position. He’s someone lots of health care reporters, including this one, talked to as the national debate was boiling over for perspective on how exchanges work and other matters. Kingsdale hasn’t said yet what his next job will be, but has indicated he wants play a role in federal health reform. He could do that from within HHS or from the outside as a highly paid consultant or at think tank. Us health policy wonks will be watching closely to see where he lands. And so, I’m guessing, will Mitt Romney. If the defacto head of Massachusetts health reform ends up helping guide national reform, that will be one more thing standing in the way of Romney’s case that the two systems are “as different as night and day.”

Related Topics: 2010, ben smith, dnc, Health Care, health reform, jon kingsdale, linda douglass, mitt romney, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • darius3

    That the DNC and White House are making these announcements conveys two things. One, that the party now realizes health reform is not going to sell itself. It’s not going to become instantly popular, even with the immediate benefits Democratic leaders have been touting.
    .
    More accurately, the Democratic party now realizes that the mainstream media simply isn’t up to the task of dispelling the massive amount of lies and disinformation being propagated by the opponents of health-care reform.

  • Matt

    Health care is meaningless for most voters (save the Tea Partiers, and we know how they’ll vote already…). Americans care about jobs and the economy, not stale fights over an issue that was resolved six months before the election.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • earljr1

    Good luck in selling this turkey! It never ceases to amaze me that democrats think the public is stupid and oblivious to their sleight of hand passage of this horrible bill. Recent polls show the majority of Americans, 58%, STILL think it was a bad idea and POORLY constructed. It will take MAJOR modifications before it will ever fly and even then, has the potential of overwhelming an already over worked health care delivery system. Yes, indeed, lots of logic in that. Once again, a perfect example of NOT listening to the American people.

  • acameronw

    Last time I checked, passing a bill – any bill – by a simple majority is not “sleight of hand.” There are a lot of things about the bill that can be easily defended, but Democratic candidates running this year should simplify the arguments. “Insurance companies are no longer able to decide they’ve spent enough on your care when you need it most. Are you for or against that?” “Insurance exchanges will allow individuals and small businesses to work together to get lower premiums for themselves and their employees. Are you for or against that?” “Parents can keep keep their kids on their policies until they are twenty-six. Are you for or against that?” “The HHS secretary will have the power to stop arbitrary and abusive rate increases from insurance companies. Are you for or against that?” I think that’s an argument that can win.

  • kevin

    Um, no. The majority likes the Affordable Care Act:
    .

    By 49%-40%, those polled say it was “a good thing” rather than a bad one that Congress passed the bill. Half describe their reaction in positive terms — as “enthusiastic” or “pleased” — while about four in 10 describe it in negative ways, as “disappointed” or “angry.”
    .
    The largest single group, 48%, calls the legislation “a good first step” that needs to be followed by more action. And 4% say the bill itself makes the most important changes needed in the nation’s health care system.

    .
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-23-health-poll-favorable_N.htm
    .
    Man, I wish I could insist as the conservatives do here that my own personal feelings are, in every instance, an accurate reflection of “the will of the American people.”

  • kevin

    Also, if I follow conservatives in projecting my will onto the nation as a whole, should I use the random all-caps format?
    .
    Like…
    .

    You know what SHOWS the REAL will of the PEOPLE?
    .
    The ELECTION of 2008, when the American PEOPLE elected MAJORITIES of Democrats in the WHITE House, the SENATE, and THE house on a platform promising to DO exactly what they DID.
    .
    Sorry, but one RASMUSSEN poll doesn’t undo THE results of the ELECTION.

    .
    I don’t know, it still needs practice. Does Richard Mellon Scaife fund some kind of seminar for you all? Or is there a show on Fox I should be watching?

  • lcky9

    OK lets see, President Obama can’t sell health care and he is trying to sell this bad bill Now the are spending money to sell this bill FULL TIME.. OBAMA has been selling it FULL TIME.. PEOPLE DON’T LIKE IT.. to bad they see the taxes coming.. among other things.. What a bunch of losers.. EVERYONE know the ONLY reason this bill got through is the PRESIDENT bought the votes, and the money due on those purchases is coming due.. Keep talking Dems your digging the hole deeper and deeper.. gotta love it..I know I was a 30 year Democratic supporter and I will be voting for and working for every Republican there is .. even donating directly to the Republican candidates something I NEVER did before..

  • vstillwell

    I have to say, I’m impressed with Swampland and more impressed with the people who read it. The comments to the blogs are almost as good as the blogs. I wish the electorate as a whole was as informed and articulate as Swampland readers.

  • megatronrises

    See kevin 3.3

  • fedupwithfedgovernment

    I think the Dems will have a very hard time convincing the voters that this Health Care Reform Bill is going to provide affordable health insurance coverage for all. The exerpt below is from the Washington Post.

    Medicare Administration is already saying that the funds could run out in 2011 and HHS is concerned that the $5 Billion funding for the Federal High Risk Pool subsidies may not be enough.

    It has been clear from the beginning that the Bill would cost way more then Obama and Dems claimed and I guarantee that we will be borrowing more money and increasing the Federal Debt to pay for this Bill.

    The exerpt below is from the Washington Post

    Low-cost coverage in Obama health plan not for all
    By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

    consumer groups supporting the health care law are worried that the federal risk pool may still be unaffordable for some. In a letter to Sebelius, 13 consumer, labor, and patient advocacy groups urged additional subsidies to help low-income people. But the $5 billion that Obama and Congress set aside may not be enough to support even a basic program for long.

    A recent report by Medicare economists warns that the program could go through $4 billion in its first year, and run out of money as early as 2011. HHS spokesman Nick Papas sought to downplay concerns about the funding. “We are confident that the resources provided in reform will help provide coverage to Americans in need,” he said.

  • dwimby

    Wait till you see the results and the cost increases in many aspects of health care and then you might grasp that Obamacare was precisely the wrong way for the country to go. There is nothing newly available from Obamacare that could not have been dealt with singly in a direct and honest manner. Obamacare is a huge victory for Big Medicine and Big Pharma. The O-Man did not have the guts to allow health insurance companies to compete across state lines and where is the public option? Obamacare has little to do with CORRECTING what was wrong with healthcare for about 10% of the population (30 million) and everything to do with EXPANDING BIG GOVERNMENT. In a couple years, if it is not repealed, and it should be, Obamacare will resemble the Post Office, it will be nothing more than a money gobbling loser, precisely what the country does not need. Precisely.

  • earljr1

    Kevin, as usual, has his head still buried in the sand. Take a look at the real clear politics polls and tell me how enamored the American people are with this administration. Take a look at those “we are headed in the wrong direction” numbers and tell me this does not represent a major disillusionment with this lying administration. Only hard core liberals fail to see the light and Kevin, you are up to your eyebrows in liberal fantasy dust! You will follow the “anointed” one, right off the cliff.

  • russpoter

    GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT

    Send bumbers in, get lousy output.

    Well, Nov. 2, that all changes.

    All that time and money wasted — plutocrats staying the course.

blog comments powered by Disqus