Morning Must Reads: The First Act

White House

Official White House Photo by Pete Souza

–If Mitch McConnell raised the curtain on this season of financial reform political theater yesterday, then the White House serves as backdrop for the first act today. Obama is set to meet with Speaker Pelosi, Leader Reid, Senator McConnell, Rep. Boehner and Rep. Hoyer at the White House to discuss the issue.

Ezra Klein draws a distinction between “financial regulation reform” and “Wall Street reform.” I’d say it’s a bit of both, but on the whole, the biggest pieces of the proposed legislation are more about regulatory apparatus than fundamentally altering the structure of the financial sector.

–The White House is going with the phrase “Wall Street reform.” The political merits are apparent.

–Politics are definitely at play in the surprising potency of Blanche Lincoln’s derivatives plan. Olympia Snowe likes it. Judd Gregg won’t.

–Peter Baker looks at Obama’s foreign policy chops. A taste:

If there is an Obama doctrine emerging, it is one much more realpolitik than his predecessor’s, focused on relations with traditional great powers and relegating issues like human rights and democracy to second-tier concerns. He has generated much more good will around the world after years of tension with Mr. Bush, and yet he does not seem to have strong personal friendships with many world leaders.

–Our colleague Tony Karon explains the diplomatic challenges of achieving sanctions against Iran. One key point:

Iran doesn’t necessarily need to win others over to its own camp; simply keeping them out of the Western camp would count as a victory. And the positions of Turkey, Brazil — and even China — on the preferability of dialogue over sanctions may be a sign that the U.S. and its allies could struggle to isolate Iran.

–The friendship between China and Iran may just be skin deep.

–With the Confederate History Month flap still fresh in peoples’ minds, the Washington Post has an op-ed eviscerating Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell’s policy on former convict voting rights. Read the piece for the details, but here’s a line that jumps off the page: “This is Jim Crow by another name.”

–Bruce Bartlett has some interesting thoughts on Fox News and MSNBC.

–Considering the date, a few points on that whole “half of Americans don’t pay taxes” thing. It’s federal income taxes, not all taxes; those people still have payroll, state and local taxes. David Leonhardt notes that “about three-quarters of all American households pay more in payroll taxes, which go toward Medicare and Social Security, than in income taxes.” Every discussion of fiscal matter circles back to entitlement costs sooner or later.

Derek Thompson on the phenomenon’s political roots:

When moderate and conservative pols are reluctant to announce new spending programs for fear they will look like socialists, they execute these spending programs through the tax system.

–The GOP is having a hard time recruiting big names to challenge Senator Gillibrand in New York. Former Governor Pataki finally ruled out a bid, and for now the field looks like Bruce Blakeman, Joseph DioGuardi and David Malpass.

–As expected, Democrat Ted Deutch easily won last night’s special election to replace Robert Wexler in Florida’s 19th.

–Blanche Lincoln is having some fundraising trouble in Arkansas.

–AFSCME is going after her with a $500,000 buy for this spot:

–Charlie Crist gets to fend off questions about running as an indpendent, while Marco Rubio fends off questions about running for president.

–And our friends over at the Curious Capitalist get in on the morning round-up game.

What did I miss?

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Budgets, Congress, Democratic Party, Harry Reid, Health Care, Iran, Miscellany, Nancy Pelosi, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • Matt

    Americans despise Wall Street and financial CEO’s even more than they do lawmakers on Capitol Hill. The GOP must tread carefully if they are really going to side with the banks on financial regulation.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • nflfoghorn

    “…Charlie Crist gets to fend off questions about running as an indpendent [sic], while Marco Rubio fends off questions about running for president.”
    .
    Not enough coffee this AM, AS?
    .
    Polo’s got less experience and clout than SP, IMO. And so far he’s won a great big pile of NOTHIN’.
    .
    You missed the ex-astronauts tryna tell BO not to gut NASA.

  • michaelfury

    When were “human rights and democracy” ever first-tier concerns for the Bush regime?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2010/01/23/the-ceremony-of-innocence/

  • nflfoghorn

    Maybe DioGuardi can count on his daughter to drum up some votes. Maybe switch an AT&T line or two… :)

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    I still think everyone should pay at least a *little* income tax. Again, I base my argument from “it should be an issue of nationalistic pride to contribute to the greatness of your country” and while people are still paying payroll taxes and other taxes, they aren’t really cognate of the fact that those taxes are being paid.

  • jsfox

    And an ex astronaut tells other ex-astronauts to put a sock in it :)

    “Many said the president’s decision was misguided, short-sighted and disappointing,” Aldrin wrote in an op-ed piece for The Wall Street Journal. “Having the experience of walking on the moon’s surface on the Apollo 11 mission, I think he made the right call. If we follow the president’s plan, our next destination in space, Mars, will be within our reach.”

    And gut? An increased NASA budget overall and the killing of one program is not what most people would define as gutting.

  • m0mentom0ri

    This must really tick you off then:
    .
    According to Boeing’s 2009 annual report, the company paid no federal income tax in 2009 and actually received $132 million back from the IRS.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Well….corporations have never demonstrated an ability to consider nationalistic pride so it is a very different form of frustration

  • Ivy_B

    But now that the SCOTUS has said they have the same rights as people…
    .
    And many of them wrap themselves in the flag all the time. momentomori gave only one example. We lose vast quantities of money by corporations paying no taxes.
    .
    they aren’t really cognate of the fact that those taxes are being paid. Trust me, if your income is low enough to fit this you are cogate of where every cent of your money goes.

  • jsfox

    In reality, in any given tax year 60%+ of all US corporations pay no income tax.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/08/12/national/main4342535.shtml

    http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Taxes/P80242.asp

    And what’s a real stunner ExxonMobil paid zero taxes in 2009.

  • grape_crush
  • charlieromeobravo

    “yet he does not seem to have strong personal friendships with many world leaders.”
    .
    Another lesson learned from Bush no doubt. Friendly personal relations between world leaders is great but you can’t base a foreign policy on being buddies with the other guy. If you do, you could end up getting played (Putin) or stranded with a ringer (Musharaf). I think we’re better off having Obama respected by foreign leaders than liked personally but otherwise dismissed.

  • Ivy_B

    See Bush and the Merkel back rub. Also Bush and Blair – didn’t help either of them, or the world.
    .
    I agree, I’d much rather have respect than frat boy humor.

  • Paul-no not that one

    It’s interesting to me that Bruce Bartlett has a better grasp of what FNC and MSNBC are (and are not) than “Media Critic” Howard Kurtz.

  • freeinpa

    “According to Boeing’s 2009 annual report, the company paid no federal income tax in 2009″

    The same Boeing that hired Linda Daschle as a lobbyist for all those years?
    ==
    “corporations have never demonstrated an ability to consider nationalistic pride”

    National pride? That’s punch line for liberals. You expect national pride to pay taxes which by itself is a twisted view but respect for its institutions, national defense or patriotism is ridiculed.

    ==
    “We lose vast quantities of money by corporations paying no taxes.”

    We? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? No one loses money by not paying taxes except those that pay it. It is their money- not yours or the governments.

  • Art Pepper

    re: Derivatives exchanges. I can’t claim to understand the issue, but for years the Economist argued that a derivatives exchange was unnecessary because the players in that market are so savy, they would never take undue risk. And look how that turned out.

    re income tax, when did the GOP switch to arguing that taxes are too low? Oh that’s right — taxes are always too high for the rich and too low for the freeloaders.

    The % of households who owe zero Federal income tax rose from 38% to 47%. Do you suppose that has anything to do with the Great Recession?

    Shorter GOP: Don’t blame us, blame them.

  • Art Pepper

    Yes, but I disagree with his prescription that MSNBC should become more like Fox. What liberals need on their side is more fact-free crypto-racist raving conspiracy-theory-laden demagogy? No thanks.

  • artraveler

    It was a non-union mine and the owner is one of the most anti-union businessmen around, so much so, that he sits on the national Chamber of Commerce.

    We need to fine them and when a–holes like this owner don’t pay up, sue the corporation, and place the mine in receivership with orders that it is to be made safe or it will be closed. The people need to work but no one should have to bet on their lives or a pay check.

  • apr2563

    nfl: I just think it is so funny. The Rep presidential candidate field is so weak, they jump at anyone. How many names have been floated in the last year? All the regulars, plus Brown, Jindahl, Rubio, Thune, Daniels, why Crist was considered not too long ago.
    Who hasn’t been mentioned other than the 2 Maine ladies? Let’s see how about Virginia Fox or Jean Schmidt?

  • deconstructiva

    “500 words” –
    This is an earlier photo of the pre-Ellen “American Idol” guest judges during a bad audition. Their politcal training makes them too polite to be upfront (about how much one’s singing really sucks) like Simon.

  • apr2563

    I am retired. My income is very low and I pay no income tax. Forgottenlord, how much should I pay out of my annual income of approximately $10,000 a year? Maybe I should give up my luxury mobile home. I am very aware of income tax, having paid it for years. I think I paid my share. That can’t be said for corporations and others. Glen Beck has suggested maybe non tax payers should be drafted into the military. Heck NO I wont go!

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/

    Above is a hysterical comment by Jon Stewart on this subject. He covers it all. Get past the initial ad.

  • apr2563

    art: I would like to see these greedy mine owners who care nothing for their employees be sent down into the worst mines and spend a significant time working there.

  • freeinpa

    apr2563

    “how much should I pay out of my annual income of approximately $10,000 a year?

    The correct answer is zero

  • m0mentom0ri

    Obviously, Freepy doesn’t need fire departments, police departments, or the military to protect him. He doesn’t use the interstates or the postal service, and he can decide for himself about the quality of the food he eats and the water he drinks.
    .
    And since he doesn’t use any of these service provided for him by tax dollars, he shouldn’t have to pay any taxes.
    .
    Because if he did use those services, and still didn’t want to pay taxes, that would make him a parasite.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    apr: You misunderstand me. For me, government is the best conduit for collective good – in part because it listens to the whims and needs of the collective. The idea behind it is a concept of “everyone chips in what they can and we all get benefits in return” – I suppose when I put it like that, it sounds like the core line of Marxism – “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”. From that aspect, every one of us has a duty to contribute our share and receive our fair share from the government. What would your share be at $10K/yr? I don’t know – something small, say $5. But the idea behind it, for me, is that you are intentionally and knowingly contributing to this society – even if at the end of the day, you get out of society far more than you put in. Yes, the rich would still have to pay more than the poor, but if taxes are about nationalism, are a form of patriotism, than it follows that everyone should contribute to the endeavor. As it is, taxes are seen as robbery, as being forced to shell out for the government out of “my” pocket.
    .
    If we’re all in this together, than we all have a responsibility, together, to contribute to this society. From the rich to the poor, the retired to the working to the unemployed.
    .
    Yes, issues like Boeing disgust me, but it is a separate issue since only the law is capable of considering a corporation a person – I don’t expect a corporation to be a patriot. Exxon disgusts me more because I know what their profits have been over the last 5 years so for them to not pay taxes makes me sick. But when 50% of the US doesn’t contribute, it (IMO) creates a nation of people who don’t feel they should have to contribute – and it is that psyche, IMO, that has created this problem in the first place.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    On a completely different note: Freeper: I don’t mind patriotism. I dislike blind and am disgusted by false and “black-and-white” patriotism.
    .
    Blind patriotism: it’s one thing to say America is #1, it’s another thing to assume that means you have the best health care, the best crime prevention strategies, the best education system, the best military, the best veteran affairs structure, the best government, the best X. Yes, in some of those cases (military comes to mind), there are few if any who would dispute the claim, but found that claim on something. The US has the most expensive military in the world is a justification. On the flip side, perhaps the fact that your education system is rated at 17th (last I checked) in the world suggests that you could use some lessons from other nations.
    .
    False patriotism: when you claim that you support something to look patriotic but do nothing to back up your words. The Bush Administration was one of the worst: the President failed to complete his time in the National Guard and the Vice President got 5 deferments, but they started two wars and hid behind patriotism for anyone that questioned either war – particularly the war in Iraq. That’s false patriotism.
    .
    Black-and-White Patriotism: Just because he’s President doesn’t mean it’s unpatriotic to support him. Disagreeing with an action the country takes does not make you unpatriotic. It is a false assumption to claim that you either support the war or are against our troops. That’s black-and-white patriotism.
    .
    All of these are not about patriotism. They are about abusing the concept of patriotism for political gain. It is the ultimate ridicule (to use your word) of patriotism.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    I assume you’re talking about last week’s mine accident. There were no unions to fight for safety at that mine because Massey electric shut the union down.
    .
    Check the stats on mining accidents in the last 40-50 years. The vast majority of them, all of them in the last 10 years have been at non-union mines.

  • iggydwonderllama

    Thank you for the link regarding voting rights. I not only think that restoration should be automatic, I’ve always found it concerning that felons have their voting rights stripped while incarcerated. The potential for political abuse is obvious. It can also be a tool for the establishment to suppress cultural change. What if the majority of people favor changing a law, but so many have been locked up, that they cannot win a vote? Is that really desirable? Might this be relevant to marijuana laws? Mostly, I think society has more to gain by as many people as possible voting than anything to lose by “coddling” criminals.

  • http://erieangel.wordpress.com erieangel

    Income tax? I have never paid income tax. In fact I usually get all of my withholding back. Once in a while, I actually get back more than is withheld. But then I work for peanuts at a community mental health agency.
    .
    Personally, I think something is wrong with the system when people get more back than was withheld. I firmly bellieve in a flat tax (say 3% or so) no deductions. Everybody will pay their share and learn to like it.

  • apr2563

    forgotton: I understand you are asking people to feel they are contributing to their country. And, yes we all benefit from what we are provided. It just sounds a little condescending to me. The poor need to contribute so they will feel better about themselves?
    /
    Please, would you understand (I am not talking about me, although I have experienced real poverty in the past) for some people $5.00 can mean providing milk for their children. I pay plenty of local and state taxes.
    /
    I am not dense and understand what taxes provide. I have contributed many hours of community work for free. Should I have expected a small amount of pay to feel I was being recognized? And, why not expect and demand coroporations be patriotic?
    /
    Forgotten, it is not my opposition to paying a minimal tax, it is the reason you are proposing.

  • apr2563

    http://www.thedailyshow.com/
    Forgottenlord: Please watch this video I have linked to. It is the second video on the right. Stewart shows the Beck’s not only stating that people who don’t pay taxes should be conscripted. Understand this is a Beck issue. Besides it is really funny.

  • grape_crush

    It was a non-union mine and the owner is one of the most anti-union businessmen around, so much so, that he sits on the national Chamber of Commerce.
    .
    Yup. But look at who’s asking the question in that quote.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Apr: believe me, I’m aware of the conditions of those in poverty, but for me, it is an issue of reconciling two nearly opposing positions that seem to have played out to the extreme in the US: the (IMO) flawed view of taxes as a chore rather than a duty and the difficulties faced by those in poverty. It’s not about “feeling better about themselves” but about instilling taxes as a value, not a requirement.
    .
    Also keep in mind that this is a relatively recent addition to me completing that circle so it is far from polished or well understood by me. I’ve believe about the responsibility of paying taxes for a long time (actually, my parents instilled it in me).
    .
    That said, finding a way to budget for 0.05% of your income…. I have a hard time seeing it as being as great as “the difference between putting milk on their table”. Yes, there is an empathy problem (my wife grew up on welfare so I’m all too aware of there being an empathy problem), but at the same time, there is a societal level problem when it comes to taxes and I just can’t help feeling that it requires a societal level solution. For me, this ideal is a societal level answer.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    (Side note: can’t watch the video ATM: work)

  • apr2563

    forgottenlord: watch the video at home. As usual, Stewart gets it better than most.
    /
    I have never been on welfare, even though qualified. My parents did not believe in what they called the dole, even after surviving the depression. My parents paid taxes and never took short cuts. Up until my retirement, I paid taxes every year.
    /
    Poor people aren’t children. I am sure most would be happy, if they made enough, to pay. They don’t need lessons in responsibility and how great it is to contribute.
    Sorry, this is an issue you and I cannot agree on.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Sorry, I forgot to answer a completely different question:
    .
    Corporations are not people at every level of thought. They do not think with emotions – they are cold and dead and answer only to the almighty dollar. To expect anything else from them is ludicrous and is a fatal flaw in nearly far too many debates about capitalism. They will do exactly as they are required to by the government and then devote their energy solely towards making money – and often they won’t even do what’s required.
    .
    I can demand that they pay taxes. For the privilege of operating here, they can pay taxes on their income. If they think the benefits of working operating locally are not outweighed by the costs, they can go ahead and leave – I have few problems with that. But to expect nationalism is to presume emotions and corporations have none.
    ——————————————
    The other month, Time asked “can the US afford to give the middle class another tax cut?” I believe 65% said yes. The Bush Tax Breaks (those misnamed Bush Tax Cuts) are expiring – the US populace sees it as Obama raising taxes according to polls. And I cannot conceive a world where 50% are making so little compared to the mean that they shouldn’t have to pay taxes. While the vast majority of Americans will pay taxes, I see no real evidence that they actually see it as contributing or a responsibility.

blog comments powered by Disqus