Jail Time for Insurance Evaders? Yes, Said Fox News

A little more than a week ago, Tom Coburn did something fairly courageous by political standards. At a town hall meeting in Oklahoma, the conservative Republican senator referred to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as a “nice lady” and criticized Fox News. (He was briefly booed for the Pelosi comment.) After an audience member mentioned “the possibility of imprisonment” for those who don’t buy health insurance, Coburn told her, “The intention is not to put anybody in jail. That makes for good TV news on FOX but that isn’t the intention.”

(This is true, the reform law expressly prohibits the government from jailing anyone who fails to either obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty.)

Then, last night Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly raked Coburn over the coals for his comment about the network. O’Reilly said no one had ever appeared on Fox News and told viewers they would go to jail if they didn’t buy health insurance. “We researched on Fox News if anybody had ever said you’re going to jail if you don’t buy health insurance. Nobody’s ever said it.”

Like Coburn, I was pretty sure I’d heard exactly this assertion numerous times on Fox News, so I did a quick search of their transcripts. Here’s what I found (emphasis mine):

YOUR WORLD WITH NEIL CAVUTO, November 13, 2009

CAVUTO: So, how much will Senator Harry Reid’s health care bill ultimately cost? Come Monday, we should find out, but, the longer the wait, the more the leaks. And here’s the latest, a $54 billion addition, a report today saying that the tax threshold on those so-called Cadillac plans is now being raised to $23,000 for couples from $21,000.

That means fewer union members then would potentially get hit. Could that be a payoff for union support and a big Democratic base?

Republican Congressman Dave Reichert of Washington says yes. Congressman, if that is the case, will that $2,000 difference make the difference?

REP. DAVE REICHERT (R), WASHINGTON: Well, you know, what I`m worried about is that we continue on with this — this whole idea that we’re going to pay for this bill by taxing people. So, now we’re going to tax their health insurance plans. On the House side, we have already passed a bill that taxes families, taxes small businesses, taxes medical devices for seniors and our special-needs community. And then we are also going to fine people and send them to jail. So, the bill just keeps getting worse and worse and worse. Every day that goes by…

CAVUTO: I understand, Congressman.

GLENN BECK, November 12, 2009

BECK: They justify the $1 dollar health care plan by saving, you know, money through some magical fairy money. I don’t know how they’re going to do it. They don’t play by the rules the rest of us have to play by, because they make them up as they go! But if you don’t play by their new rules on health care — oh, here’s a new little twist. Have you heard this? You’re going to be looking at a fun little stint in jail.

HANNITY, November 10, 2009

HANNITY: All right, Dick Morris was on the program last night. Penalties for people who don’t get government-mandated health insurance. Jail time, possibility? Here’s President Obama addressing this in an interview.

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: If you have the ability to buy insurance, it’s affordable, and you choose not to do so, forcing you and me and everybody else to subsidize you, you know, there’s a thousand- dollar hidden tax that families all across America are burdened by because of the fact that people don’t have health insurance. You know, there is nothing wrong with a penalty. Penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance.

HANNITY: Jail? Is that…

MUELLER: We are losing freedom. The Berlin Wall anniversary is just the other day. And these are the kind of policies that used to be imposed on people behind that wall. One problem we’re going to have, though, Sean, they’re going to have, though, Sean, they’re going to have to do something about prisons. They’re going to put all these people in jail. It cost $50,000 a year to take care of a prisoner. So they’re going to have to do prison reform.

HANNITY: That’s going to be true.

MUELLER: Democrats don’t like to do prisons.

HANNITY: Put people in jail if they don’t get their government mandated health? We’re going to tax business. We’re going to tax individuals. There’s going to be fines. There’s going to be penalties. There’s a millionaire’s tax. We’re paying for it through the wall. This is what you want?

GLENN BECK, November 10, 2009

JUDGE NAPOLITANO (filling in for Beck): Last Saturday, at 11:00 in the evening, the House of Representatives voted by a five-vote margin to have the federal government manage the health care of everyone in America at a cost of over $1 trillion over the next 10 years. For the first time in American history, if this bill becomes law, the Feds will force you to buy insurance you might not want or may not need or cannot afford. If you don’t purchase what the government tells you to buy, if you don’t do so when they tell you to do it, if you don’t buy just what they say is right for you, the government may fine you, prosecute you, and even put you in jail.

HANNITY, November 9, 2009

HANNITY: All right. You’ve got — the senators are saying no way. OK? Lieberman is saying he’ll filibuster. You’ve got the blue — you’ve got in the Senate they’re saying no way they’re going to get a government option. Then you’ve got these two internal battles that I just described. How do you see this?

DICK MORRIS: Well, the fight over the public option is the focus at the moment of the Senate debate and the abortion provision as well. I don’t personally much care about either one. I think that the bill, even with the abortion amendment and even without the public option, is plenty injurious itself. That would leave the Medicare cuts, the huge payments by the uninsured. One of the provisions in the Pelosi bill is you actually can go to jail for not having health insurance. It says that if you don’t have health insurance, you have to pay a fine of 2.5 percent of your income to the government. And if you don’t, you face $250,000 or five years in prison. Can you imagine your prison yard, what are you in for? Murder. I’m in for rape. I didn’t have health insurance.

CAVUTO, November 20, 2009

CHARLES PAYNE (hosting): Stocks slipping a bit today. That makes it three straight days in the red. But that may have nothing to do with one firm’s hunch, if it is right. Timothy Geithner’s job could be hanging in the balance. The treasury secretary facing major heat on Capitol Hill from Republicans and some Democratic congressman, some even calling for his resignation, both sides, by the way. Is this advice alarmist or practical? Let’s ask “FOX Business” all- stars, Matt McCall, Tracy Byrnes, Mark Tatge and Gary B. Smith.

Gary B., practical or alarmist?

GARY B. SMITH, EXEMPLAR CAPITAL: I think it is very practical. Look, Charles, at some of the things we’ve seen. You don’t pay your health insurance taxes, you could go to prison. You are chairman of G.M., we don’t like you, you’re fired! You know, Wall Street, we gave you money, no Christmas party for you! You know what that sounds like to me? That sounds like Soviet Russia back in the ’60s and ’70s. We know how well their economy turned out.

All of these statements were made after the Senate Finance Committee passed its version of the health reform legislation, which specifically prohibited imprisoning people for refusing to pay the tax penalty levied on those without insurance. To be fair, the House bill did not specifically prohibit this, but it also did not include this threat. Critics who said failure to obtain insurance would result in jail time were quoting a piece of the internal revenue code, not any version of health reform legislation. Further explanation here, here, and here.

Related Topics: bill o'reilly, Dick Morris, Fox news, glenn beck, Health Care, health reform, jail, neil cavuto, tom coburn, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Jim Bourg / Reuters

    At CPAC, Romney Stresses Conservative Credentials

    Three days after a trifecta of losses underlined lingering questions about his ability to win over the Republican Party’s base, Mitt Romney arrived at CPAC to allay skeptics’ fears. Throughout his second bid for the GOP nomination, Romney has made his business bona fides the centerpiece of his candidacy. But on Friday, before a packed room at the annual conservative confab, he sought to emphasize the record he compiled in Massachusetts. “I was a severely conservative governor,” he told the crowd. “I know conservatism, because I have lived conservatism.” 

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

    Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception

    In the face of mounting pressure from Catholic leaders and politicians, the White House on Friday tweaked its position on contraception coverage mandates in the Affordable Care Act. Rather than require large religious institutions like Catholic colleges and hospitals to provide employees with free health insurance coverage for contraception, insurance companies themselves will have to pick up the tab.

  • 53_3

    Well, what do you expect O’Reilly to say?
    .
    Hells bells, maybe Palin should jump in to rally the stoopid…

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Well now I don’t need to watch Jon Stewart tonight. Kate’s already given us a transcript of their montage.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    http://mediamatters.org/research/201004130073

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_04/023341.php

    Ok, so having been caught in a particularly bold lie by several blogospheric commentators, what actual consequences will Bill O’Reilly face as a result of his blatant dishonesty? I’m not being rhetorical, I really want to know what cost is involved in spreading obvious lies.

    Don’t everyone raise their hand at once……..

  • Art Pepper

    This is some welcome fact checking.

    I think this sort of pushback against Fox is in the best interests of actual professional journalists. Fox is to journalism what WWE is to sports. It doesn’t make you guys look good if you are both lumped together in the same category. Why do “research” about “facts” if you can just make it up?

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Nice catch Kate but I doubt if reality will matter much to Fox News. They seem occupied with inventing reality and then getting all bent out of shape over their inventions. In previous historical periods, they would have been locked in a room and given shock treatment.

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    Tough thing about being in the pokey is convincing the other guys in the weight room to change the channel to FOX.

  • freeinpa

    He will face the same one’s Obama does for his.

  • jnb987

    No, O’Reilly doesn’t get death threats like Obama does.
    .
    Sad upside-down world this is, sometimes.

  • freeinpa

    O’Reilly does receive threats and besides he doesn’t have a taxpayer funded private guard (Secret Service) and transport (Air Force 1).

    Nor does O’Reilly have the power to influence taxes and spending with any lies. It doesn’t cost me anything to listen to O’Reilly. I need to hold my watch and wallet when Obama opens his mouth.

  • shepherdwong

    Thank you very much for the media fact-check, Kate Pickert. Keep up the good and important work.

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    “I need to hold my watch and wallet when Obama opens his mouth.”

    Do you do that before or after you cross to the other side of the street?

  • fhmadvocat

    Okay, Freeinpa,

    Please give one example, where someone questioned something said by a member of the Obama administration and Obama responded, “No one in my administration ever said that!”

    When you talk about a blantant lie, we are not talking about an opinion, or a rosy scenario, or a campaign promise which the President did not keep. (All President do that). Nor are we talking about when the President makes a factual error or changes his mind. Bill Reilly chided that well known liberal Sen Tom Coburn for simply pointing out that Fox specialized in sensationalism more than news.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    I don’t know, it sounds like Rep. Dave Reichert is soft on crime.

  • highcheef

    Yeah, what Free said. Don’t know how they let this guy walk around and just say anything. Oh, for the good ol’ days when him and his kind knew their place (in the fields or in the kitchen!)
    Good thing we have great folks like Gov’s Barbour and McDonnell to let us know that we should be celebrating that fantastic group of Real American Patriots that refused to be bowled over by an over-reaching Fed Gov’t. Heck, come on Free, lets bring back the Confederacy. I’ll be Jefferson Davis and you can be Stonewall.

  • Art Pepper

    Reichert is my House rep. He is a “moderate” Republican in a purple district that has been trending blue. Yet I keep getting emails from him that contain bald-faced lies about HCR.

  • 53_3

    Now here is the Teabaggers’ place in the world:
    .
    http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/14/tea.party.poll/index.html

  • 53_3

    Not my favorite, either.
    .
    Moderate? Okaaaay.

  • grape_crush

    Interesting.

    O’Reilly: “You know, YOU KNOW, that the far-left cranks that dominate the media took what you said and ran with it all day long.”

    Coburn: “Here’s the problem, Bill… First of all, you all are running the media now in Oklahoma. I guarantee it…But when that becomes the news story…it’s that the story on the networks is more important than the actual happenings that are going on.”

    Of course, if the Jail Time Myth wasn’t pushed by Fox in the first place, there wouldn’t have been any issue; no Coburn reaction, no story in the MSM.
    .
    Of course, it’s not about the original lie, it’s about the reaction to the lie.

  • http://searchingforagrainofsanity.wordpress.com searchingforagrainofsanity

    The folks on FOX News know that if repeat a lie often enough it gets taken to be the truth. So what else is new?

  • freeinpa

    “Do you do that before or after you cross to the other side of the street?

    Only if he is holding a baseball since he throws like a girl he would only hurt himself.
    =

    “When you talk about a blantant lie, we are not talking about an opinion, or a rosy scenario, or a campaign promise which the President did not keep”

    The middle class will not pay a penny more in taxes
    or
    If oyu like your doctor or health olan you can keep it

    Those are blatant lies..

    ==
    And not surprising, most of the answers were race baiting again which is where liberal slide when they can’t make an argument.

  • freeinpa

    It means they finally learned of the tricks that liberals employ. Sucks to have your own tactics turned on you.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    Didn’t George Costanza once say “Its not a lie, if you believe it.”?

  • m0mentom0ri

    “And not surprising, most of the answers were race baiting again which is where liberal slide when they can’t make an argument.”
    .
    This coming from Freepy, who routinely call liberals ‘godless’ and ‘treasonous’.
    .
    Pot. Kettle. Black.

  • http://searchingforagrainofsanity.wordpress.com searchingforagrainofsanity

    Don’t you mean racist baiting..as it was aimed at one particular individual?

  • hippooath

    Freeinpa
    .
    Other than the snark about Obama can’t throw a ball etc
    .
    What do you think about Fox News lie and the lie that gets repeated here about the going to jail thingie.
    .
    That’s another notch against all the lies surrounding HC.
    .
    I would take the opposition serious if they lead with the actual issues regarding HC; that the bill doesn’t cover everyone, costs to much when we’re already in debt up to our eyeballs, there’s nothing in the bill that stops insurance companies from increasing their rates anyways etc, but instead we have the whole putting grandma to death, thrown in jail or death panels.
    .
    If the opposition engaged in an actual exchange of ideas rather than easily verifiable lies you’d find that most progressives aren’t exactly enchanted by the bucketful of lard that is HC either.
    .
    I get that you don’t like Obama, but the dislike seems to be founded on anti-liberal snark rather than substance.

  • sacredh

    Lies? On Fox? We’re stunned. Of course I used the blocking feature on the Dish remote to ban Fox from our house in January, but still, I can hardly believe that Fox spreads lies.

    Beck wept.

  • nflfoghorn

    Watch it or Freep will sick Batista or HHH (not to be confused with Hubert H. Humphrey) on you :)

  • Matt

    So this makes Fox News and O’Reilly liars? Again? Shocking!!

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • sacredh

    “Fox is to journalism what WWE is to sports.”
    .
    Fox is to journalism what gang bangs are to virginity. Fixed it for you.

  • sacredh

    Isn’t getting your news from Fox like passing out condoms at Purity balls? What’s the point?

  • nflfoghorn

    …shortest verse in the Neocon bible.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Agreed. Thanks for the fact-check. This is useful, informative journalism!

  • apr2563

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/201004140040
    /
    Freeper this is what is so aggrevating about the far right. The minute I read that Obama had gone to his daughter’s soccer game without the press, I knew the conspiracy nuts would be in free flow hysteria, of course, encourage by people like Limbaugh.
    /
    They have no sense of proportions. Everything is exagerrated. Well, sooner or later, people start listening to Chicken Little.
    /
    Please defend this if you can. That doesn’t mean criticizing the source. I have seen this on other sites. Also, don’t use the left does it too. Address the actual claim. The facts are the facts.

  • broknbuddha

    “Race baiting” must sound a lot more impressive as a talking point. What does it possibly have to do with the subject at hand?

    “And not surprising, most of the answers were race baiting again which is where liberal slide when they can’t make an argument.”
    “Liberals” have made an argument – Bill O’Reilly has no qualms with lying. This is evidenced by all of those direct quotes displayed for us by Ms. Pickert. If you don’t believe that argument – that Bill O’Reilly is a liar – than you need to counter all that evidence in the blog. This means that you need to show that Bill O’Reilly really didn’t know that Fox News had repeatedly told its viewers that if they didn’t by insurance, they would be thrown in jail.
    Constant malarkey like this from the right wing spin machine is one of the biggest reasons I left the GOP.

  • sacredh

    The most common too. Beck cries like he needs his diaper changed. Vitter just breaks out his wallet.

  • apr2563

    I thank you Kate. But we need more of the traditional media calling out Fox instead of defending them when the WH called them out on their bias.
    Also, the press needs to stop calling Limbaugh and Beck entertainers. No they are dangerous fear mongers.

  • apr2563

    Excuse my typos.

  • nflfoghorn

    Lessee, you got a washed-up ex-SNL “comedian,” a hot-headed, Ted Baxter-like, sanctimonious boob, a Daffy Duck impersonator @ 9pm, a serial liar who cries on cue, an ex-Miss America know-it-none, a man who brainwashed viewers into forgetting he accepted sexual favors, and a guy who has the nerve to go on national TV with the name Doocy. Not to mention a guy who busted Al Capone’s vault only to find…nothing.
    .
    Millions trust the channel as their source for “fair-and-balanced news” anyway. And, as Freepers everywhere will tell you, millions more viewers watch it than Ms.NBC and CNN combined.
    .
    How’s it feel to be one of the sheep, Freep?

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    hehe, wow, I totally mistook the meaning of “purity balls” the first time I read that.

  • sacredh

    apr2563: The current version of the GOP has blurred the lines between politics and entertainment. They’ve got the shouters and arm wavers passing themselves off as serious individuals. Palin and Bachman can tell the most outrageous lies and then the media covers their shocked reactions when they get called out for telling lies. The response? They tell more lies and claim that their opponents are trying to silence them from speaking the truth.
    .
    And some people wonder why I have so much fun with politicians.

  • apr2563

    sacred: I know you have to keep a sense of humor about the absurd. That is why enjoy your comments and need to have by Stewart and Colbert fix every night. All of that, plus, Pearls Before Swine make life bearably funny.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    to show that Bill O’Reilly really didn’t know that Fox News had repeatedly told its viewers

    You don’t even have to go that far. Uncle Bill was bold enough to claim that he checked. He not only didn’t know about the false claims. He says he went looking for them and failed to find any.

  • anon76

    Nothing wrong with washed-up ex SNL-ers. One wrote a very pertinent book on the current subject- “Lies and the Lying Liars who tell them.” Even had a picture of Bill O’Lie-lly right on the front cover.

  • nflfoghorn

    But Franken is actually FUNNY.

  • grape_crush

    Nothing wrong with washed-up ex SNL-ers.
    .
    Heh…Dunno if I’d characterize that recently elected Senator as ‘washed up’…

  • apr2563

    http://lafiga.firedoglake.com/2010/03/26/former-snl-star-victoria-jackson-glenn-beck-taught-her-well/
    /
    SNL must be just so proud of the alumnus. I keep thinking her appearances are a put on but she is serious and funny.

  • FlownOver

    Kate:

    Please pass this factual research along to your affiliated “news” staff at CNN. They continue to operate on the despicable premise that in every disagreement, each side is 50% right – even when the answer is empirically knowable.

    Does it embarrass you at Time to be associated with that bunch?

  • grape_crush

    Please pass this factual research along to your affiliated “news” staff at CNN.
    .
    Shhh. It’s not time for the media to fact check…it’s time to choose sides or be complicit with the destruction of America.

    http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201004140018

  • hotbbq

    When will you Swamplanders learn to not feed the trolls. DO NOT ENGAGE!

  • nflfoghorn

    Way OT: Larry King’s getting divorced. Again.
    .
    Elizabeth Taylor, HELLO!

  • gysgt213

    Are you serious? Again?

  • Barbara Kiviat

    Great post, Kate.

  • gysgt213

    Look Fox lies so much they can’t help it. Its like a sickness and truth is Kryptonite over there. You can count on one hand the actual reporters at that network. The rest are hacks for the republicans, extremist views, corporations or putting on this clueless act where they pretend they can’t understand simple facts.
    .
    But that is okay. It just needs to be called out without fear like Katie. But make no mistake Katie is taking a risk. The reach at Fox is far and wide.

  • nflfoghorn

    If I said dead serious, that’d be the wrong connotation :) But CBS reported it.

  • http://www.mohan37.com mo

    oh how i hope the daily show does a segment on this tonight…

  • nflfoghorn

    @ Derek: Thanks to his frequent use of the word “sir,” Guard Duck’s voice in my head is Keith Olbermann. :)

  • nflfoghorn

    5.4 was @apr2563 – sorry ;)

  • sacredh

    Larry’s a Serial Husband.
    .
    Larry, I’d switch exclusively to masturbation. A hand has never successfully sued it’s body or got a dime in alimony. At least get a doll.

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    I disagree. Shortest verse in neocon bible is, “No!” Or, “No!, No!” for extra emphasis.

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    Your “kryptonite” quote implies that they’re SuperMan. Please don’t give them that much credence. They already thing way too much of themselves.

  • maverick2k9

    Republican/Fox “talking point” LIES about the HCR are so yesterday’s news.
    .
    I think the media needs to focus now on Republican/Fox LIES about Wall Street reforms. McConnell has already started parroting Frank Luntz talking points, almost word for word.
    .
    Who is going to call him out, before Fox starts spreading that lie?

  • sacredh

    The most popular is Armageddon (November elections) though. They’re convinced the democrat’s world ends then. Those republicans that miss the Rapture Express will enjoy a thousand year rule in DC. Their 44-46 seat majority will herald a new round of heavenly tax cuts and Sarah will wear a see-though white robe. The age old question of whether angels have nipples may finally get answered.

  • senjam

    freeinipa – it does cost you something to listen to O’Reilly… Your independence and intelligence (that is assuming you had any before)! Yes! You treat him like a cult leader sucking up all his lies as gospel, then you implicitly try to defend him in the indefensible.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Maybe Matthews or Maddow or Olberman will call him/them out. Or your hero John Stoort!
    .
    Sadly no one will notice. They’re all watching Fox. Just check the ratings. When I want news (earthquakes, floods, plane crashes, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan etc.) I watch Fox. When I want ridicule and slander I flip on over to MSNBC or comedy central.

  • maverick2k9

    2thirdsrocks, Matthews is ridiculed by both left and right – Nobody on the left take him seriously.
    .
    Maddow and Olbermann are opinion shows – They don’t claim to be fair and balanced.
    .
    Jon Stewart is a self-confessed fake news comedian on Comedy Central (for crying out loud). He makes me laugh (unfortunately, at your Fox’s expense) :) .. He does not claim to be fair and balanced.. He doesn’t even claim to be an opinion wh0re like folks on Fox – Oh Really, Hannibal and Bleck.
    .
    Frankly, I don’t expect Fox to call out anyone lying. It is sufficient if they do some fact checking and do not perpetuate that lie.

  • ohiolib

    Nice post, Kate.

  • Tom in The Swamp

    Being the top-rated cable news network is very much like being the number one pork wholesaler in Israel. More adults watch Spongebob Squarepants reruns every day than watch Fox News. Even the lowest-rated network evening news show gets more than 3 times the viewers that Fox News gets.
    .
    Fox News is only relevant to politics because it drives the message of the Republican Party. It’s the only place that will give the idiots running that party any credence and unchallenged air time.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Yeah Stoort hurts em bad! Real bad! Pfffffftt!

  • gysgt213

    I would take offense, but you are Mr. Nice Guy. So I will just agree.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    As the human bbq says above:
    .
    “When will you Swamplanders learn to not feed the trolls. DO NOT ENGAGE!”

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Trolls, as in non liberal?

  • maverick2k9

    2thirds, the intent is to make people laugh, not to hurt Fox.
    .
    It is indeed unfortunate if Jon’s fake news antics does not make you laugh.
    .
    I am not saying you don’t have a sense of humor. Maybe you get your laughs from watching Bleck cry like a baby?

  • maverick2k9

    Also, 2thirds, I think Obama will call them out before any journalist or opinion maker.
    .
    And guess what, he will walk into the lion’s den and call them out, like when he did at the Repug conference or in interviews with Fox News.
    .
    But, of course, we can always rely on Fox to cut away or interrupt when he does that :)
    .
    Question really is how long can Fox get away with this?

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    “Trolls, as in non liberal?”
    .
    No, that would be mental patients deranged enough to believe that Fox News is telling the truth, Sarah Palin was winking at him personally and Ann Coulter is sexy.
    .
    We do have a minor infestation of these creatures here such as you 2thirds.

  • acameronw

    Sorry, kids. A little late to party.

    I hate to mistake the tone of a comment that may sound perfectly reasonable when spoken but a good deal less so when written, but is our ol’ buddy freeinpa actually complaining that his taxes are paying for the Secret Service and Air Force One? Would you like the President to pay for it out of pocket? At least he could chip in on those cool leather bomber jackets, I guess. Maybe find sponsors for Air Force One, pasting corporate logos on it like NASCAR.?(While I’m thinking of it, there seems to be a lot of blank space on the Washington Monument.)

    And re: HRC making taxes to go up and causing you to lose access to the doctor of your choice, could you at least wait until these things actually happen before you claim Mr. Obama is lying about them?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    So the intellectual giant does drop his guard and let fly with derision and ridicule. I higly suspect though, that that is your true demeanor Patsy, a phony in the truest sense, who can only boost his self esteem by ridiculing those unlike him. No doubt got slapped around alot on the playground as a child, so now it’s PAYBACK TIME!

  • ohiolib

    Now patrick, I know it’s tempting to respond to the name-calling and pettiness of the trolls by pointing out they’re wrong. Unfortunately, all that does is reinforce their sense of paranoia and persecution. If you just ignore them,, it best for the swamp and their sanity (such as they have left).

  • Cliff

    So, I know that the word “troll” has been tossed around pretty casually here, but 2thirdsrocks fits the definition of a troll.
    .
    He refuses to read or appreciate direct evidence shown to him, or to respond in kind:
    .
    (Comment 21.28)

    Hey kevie I’m dumb when It comes to computers, I don’t know how to post links, but I don’t need to. You’ve selected the experts that suit your beliefs, but I know damn well you’ve found just as many that say the opposite.

    .
    (Comment 21.23)

    The internet is infinite. If you look hard enough you can probably find proof that Martians walk among us. Experts abound. I suspect that the best intelligence ever gleaned by such techniques is that which we shall never ever hear about. For all you know your ass is sitting here alive and well because of it. I can’t prove it, but you can’t disprove it and you can post yer links ’till yer fingers fall off.

    .
    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/02/17/marc-theissen-the-catholic-view-of-waterboarding-and-the-victims-perspective/
    .
    There’s no point in arguing with him, he’s not here to argue in good faith.

  • skippybkroo

    “fox is to journalism what wwe is to sports”

    that’s pretty insulting.

    to the wwe.

  • fhmadvocat

    “When you talk about a blantant lie, we are not talking about an opinion, or a rosy scenario, or a campaign promise which the President did not keep”

    The middle class will not pay a penny more in taxes
    or
    If oyu like your doctor or health olan you can keep it

    Those are blatant lies..

    Middle class taxes – Obama was talking about his tax plan. He was planning to raise taxes on those who make $250,000.00. Now show me where your taxes have directly gone up (if you are trully middle class) as a result of Obama’s tax plan?

    As far as my health plan, so far I can keep my doctor, and I still have my health plan. Since the signing of the bill, have you lost your health plan or your doctor?

    How are either of these facts blatant lies since nothing has happened yet? You are using pure speculation. You don’t know what is going to happen and neither do I.

    How can you say it is a blatant lie if it hasn’t even happened yet? Yet O’Reilly was talking about the past and Obama was talking about the future.

    Now you can certainly say that Obama has painted a rosy scenario, which is not likely to happen, but that is not a blatant lie.

    It is too bad you can not see the difference.

  • sacredh

    “Fox is to journalism what WWE is to sports.”
    .
    Fox News. The crack house of journalism.

  • ksnug

    O’Reilly lies about amost everything. Why the fuss?

  • drake555

    Fox is at least being more honest now… Congrats on sticking it to them.

    http://mediamatters.org/research/201004140065

    The original claims (though obviously over blown) actually were because of some “grayness” to the legislation. So back in November, it wasn’t a bold face lie, but obviously Beck, Hannity, and company are trying to forward their agenda (which is increasing ratings to increase their wealth)

    Earlier versions of reform legislation provided for “criminal penalties” only for those who refused to pay the fee.

    Both the House and the Senate versions of health care reform required individuals to be covered by a minimum level of health insurance or pay a monetary penalty. A November 2009 letter from the Joint Committee on Taxation on the House health care bill stated that individuals who did not have such coverage and refused to pay the fine would be subject to “civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.” The committee’s letter explains that the tax code provides penalties to prevent tax evasion of any sort: “The Code provides for both civil and criminal penalties to ensure complete and accurate reporting of tax liability and to discourage fraudulent attempts to defeat or evade tax.” [Joint Committee on Taxation letter, 11/5/09]

  • kbanginmotown

    Hey JC,
    ,
    I realize it’s Thursday where you are, but we’re still wrapping up Humpday here in Swamp-time. %-|
    .
    Hopefully, we can cool off some of the flame-wars of this past week and promote insights over insults…

  • kbanginmotown

    Cliff:
    .
    What you are describing was referred to by Barney Frank as “arguing with a dining room table.”
    .
    I’m reluctant to characterize people as furniture, but various commentors have *acted* like furniture (as you noted above). (i.e. “trolling”)
    .
    It would be great if we could, as hotbbq suggested, ignore trolling and focus on meaningful discussion. At least on Thursdays. Let’s start there and branch out…

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    I guess this is newsworthy because O’ Reilly took umbrage? This is his Modus Operandii so who cares??? Yawnnnnnn

    What makes him worth noting?
    He is a loud aggressive bully and a fake.

    He consistently brings his absurd claim of being a political Independent to the fore– and that alone has cost him every last modicum of credibility. No right thinking person will take that man seriously.

    He is so far Right that he makes my neck spin and his specious claims to the contrary make him appear all the more foolish.

    There are some great journalists on Fox news but O’Reilly is not one of them.
    He is a loud and aggressive entertainer who is deluded into believing the lies he tells himself and others daily.

    Hannity?? He is almost as great a clown as some of his other truth challenged contemporaries.
    Beck of course takes the crown.
    Someday I think Beck will laugh at his own antics. He just entertains and screams about grandmas being killed and all the other bunk.
    He does not believe what he says but I guess he feels he is making a good living and this time with all the exposure will receive better treatment in the hospital than he did the last time he was crying over his poor treatment in some hospital.
    Since then he has sold his soul to Alaskan wolves. :)

    The only frightening difference between Beck and Hannity is that Hannity appears to have perfected the act of appearing as though he truly believes in the nonsense he spouts on Fox. Poor sod.

    Again, as I always state here and elsewhere WHO ARE THESE people who believe they will be jailed for not having insurance and what type of crack are they smoking??????
    It is as absurd as the uproar that followed the death panel pronouncement by Palin.

    Why would anyone think a sitting president would sanction acts that border on vicious indifference to human life??

    The believers of this movement and the fear mongering are almost as pathetic as the oscar winning worthy actors on Fox, O’Reilly, Hannity and Beck.

    Watching the news these days on some networks is almost the same as watching a weird comedy.
    Politics in the media has taken on the appearance of jokers and clowns.

    For the lies of O’Reilly and his pack of liars to take up valuable space on Swampland is indeed quite riveting<- NOT. :) He is a loud mouthed lying wanna be bully whose ego is furiously fanned by the bevvy of blondes who surround him with unending adulation.

    Who cares about this silly entertainer, O' Reilly and his other lying anti Obama driven entertainers and liars on Fox news ?? I certainly do not.
    As an Independent and staunch believer in the truth, I rather watch "Rug Rats". haha :) Seriously!

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • Cliff

    I agree completely.
    .
    The reason I linked back to that thread was because 2/3 got pushed into admitting he’s not here to argue, or convince, or learn – he’s here to insult. Which is a remarkable admission (he essentially lost the game right there), and I would like for the regulars not to forget it.
    .
    Freeper and rusty dance around it a little more, and I haven’t seen them flat out admit what they’re doing yet.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Well, now it’s officially Thursday in both hemis, K-Bang. I see the temptation in feeding the little malnourished specimens. Their under-bridge locale, lacking access to a protein rich diet etc. It’s so alluring and easy. But it also validates them, that they’re worthy of intelligent rebuttal, that they’re on the same plane with the reality-familiar.

    IMHO, troll or nay, someone who watches Fox, defends Fox (or Bush or pretty much the GOP circa 2010) is not worth a whit of my time. Why f’ing bother? You’re not going to reach them any more than a credentialed, fire-breathing liberal is going to bend one mm to spit on a conservative talking pt.

    To obliquely answer 2/3, no it doesn’t mean non-liberals. N-R or Apol are conservatives worth engaging on a number of issues. No surprise that they both voted for Ron Paul last time out. In fact, I’d rather have a discussion with them than some of the liberals here who match our resident rightists insult for insult.

    But I’m fairly certain I’m in the minority.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    ‘to spit on a [republican] talking pt’

  • abdullah69

    Interesting how two thirds sees news as being in terms of someone else’s suffering – earthquakes. floods, etc. But I guess this is the way many Republicans get through a Democrat administration. Once a Republican is back in the White House they go back to getting off on how high the DOW is, how many small countries have been vanquished recently, etc.

  • sasquatch08

    So let me get this straight here…
    .
    Beck is not a journalist his program is and openly claims to be opinion, so we can strike that from the “going to jail is a fact on Fox” statement right off the bat.
    .
    Secondly, while I don’t generally watch O’Riellys show, I did actually see this one and the statement here wasn’t a statement and he was told it that “jail” was not an option and accepted it.
    .
    Everyone else I see here is a “Fox News Contributor” or someone who is asked their opinion.
    .
    Finally, this is a reasonable question. Look and Wiener, he won’t even admit anything other than that this is in IRS jurisdiction and that he just gets angry that would would ask him if they can legally take it out of your tax refund and yells that you “don’t know what you’re talking about”.
    .
    Now, we all know that this is in IRS jurisdiction because you must report your insurance status to them. So it stands to reason that if you fail to meet the standards the money gets taken out of your refund I would think. You’re refund was $1700, you get that less the fine for not having insurance. Or what? They’re going to call a private debt collection agency to get it? Doubtful!
    .
    The thing here is that if you don’t pay taxes you CAN go to jail. It’s called “tax evasion” and it’s a felony. So lets say you’re like me, and you filled out your forms to reduce the amount you lose every month to a minimum, last year I got about $1900 back, this year, filling out the forms for less deductions they only owe me $28.47. If I didn’t have insurance for say… 5 years and owed them the $800 or so they are fining me for it, but only totaled $28.47×5= $142.35, am now in debt to the IRS $800×5 = $4500 less the refunds for a total debt to them of $4357.65.
    .
    That’s an incontrovertible fact; I now owe the IRS $4357.65 and have shown absolutely NO reason for them to think I will every pay them that sum, nor have I given them a reason to think that the sum won’t continue to grow every year.
    .
    Now what? There’s not many choices for the IRS. They can eat the money (which will never happen), put leans on my property, garnish my paychecks or jail me for tax evasion.
    .
    Honestly, I suspect they’ll garnish my paychecks but jail is still on the table if I decide to be enough of a dick about this.
    .
    No matter what they do I can expect audits every year from now until eternity, and that sucks. Get audited and tell me you enjoyed it.

  • sasquatch08

    “He is a loud mouthed lying wanna be bully whose ego is furiously fanned by the bevvy of blondes who surround him with unending adulation.”
    .
    I am surprised to hear someone on here finally telling the truth about Olberman, and FYI he seems to prefer the brunettes.

  • sasquatch08

    I apologize in advance because this is SUPER long:
    .
    Now on a totally different topic and because Time will never have the good graces to start a thread that addresses this: let’s talk some numbers. They’re simple, they aren’t biased and they’re pretty freaking scary. In some cases they show the government to fall into the “fat cat” group too.
    .
    A couple days ago I was getting high with a friend of mine who’s pretty darn conservative and he pretty much forced me to watch Glenn Beck. Personally, I’m not a fan of Beck. He’s preachy and if you ever took a political science class in college you’d know most is either correct or comes from some strange universe with most of what he says. However, he made some statements that forced me to do some research because I flat out didn’t believe him. What I found is scary, I took notes and I will share some of it below, like it or not these are FACTS.
    .
    Where to start is difficult, so I’ll just jump into some numbers for you Swamplanders. According to the U.S. Department of Labor 83% of Federal government jobs out pay the private sector. For example the average federally employed cook (at say the CIA cafeteria) makes $15,121 dollars more per year than the average private sector cook, while the average mid-level Public Relations person for the Feds makes $44,162 more per year than the average mid-level privately employed PR person. This wouldn’t be scary except that the government doesn’t make money in the traditional sense. It takes it. You have a choice to do business with say Time Warner Cable or McDonald’s and help pay that Cook or PR person’s salary, with the government you don’t have a choice. Also since they aren’t subject to investors who demand a decent business model they can drastically overpay, and I would argue the above numbers pretty much prove that they do, but don’t worry it gets worse. Much worse.
    .
    The average benefits paid to a private sector worker per year are $9,882. Average Federal worker you ask? $40,785. Those numbers come from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s right, the average Federal paper-pusher gets four times the benefits that you do for the same job and who pays for that… well, you do. Can you name a Federal paper pusher you love so much you’d give them a bigger paycheck than you as well as four times the benefits? Probably not. While some may argue this is a good thing we’ll get to why it is actually VERY bad in a few paragraphs.
    .
    To digress for a moment, let’s talk about departmental spending, specifically in the Department of Health and Human Services. The projected HHS budget for 2011 is $934 Billion (you can look up my previous post and it’s citations about how this is more, much more than the VA, Depts. of Agriculture, Justice, Transportation, Education and another 4 or 5 federal other Departments COMBINED). Their projected expenditures for 2011: Employee Pay: 1%, Departmental Purchases: 2%, Aid to States (Medicare): 41% Subsidies to Individuals and Businesses: 56%. Sounds pretty good so far, I mean they are only spending 3% of that money on overhead (which is good actually, damn good). Until you look at Medicare, which cost almost $450 Billion this year and according to my calculator will cost about $523 Billion next year. The actuaries that run Medicare say that 18-20% of the money they pay out (they do get 1 billion claims a year, so give them a break) are fraud. Let’s assume that’s 18% of last year’s budget: 450x.18=81, so that $81 Billion down the drain (at BEST, could be as high as $90 Billion) to fraudsters! As a matter of fact it’s so easy a girl in Florida was caught earlier this year, she had submitted over 100,000 fraudulent claims to Medicare and from her illegal activities had profited almost $100 Million. She was caught, but 100 million is 100,000,000/81,000,000,000=.00123. So she was taking a mere 0.012% of the total fraud that is perpetrated against Medicare in a given year.
    .
    You might hope we’re done with financial facts right now, but we’re not. Let’s take a very brief look at Social Security (SSI, or Social Security Insurance). Right now, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA) there are 56 million Americans receiving benefits with 7 million projected to be added annually for the next ten years, that’s 70 million people added. Clearly some of the current recipients will die, let’s assume that 25% of the current recipients will die and 5% of the new ones over the next ten years will too (heart attacks and car accidents happen). So we can cut that 56 million down to 42 million and cut the new people to 66.5 million. That’s still 108.5 million people e on SSI, with a total population of (let’s be SUPER generous) 400 million. That’s 27.125% of the population on SSI; that’s expensive. Now let’s get away from my hysterical (right wing no doubt) numbers and talk about what the government says its self: 2010 is the first year ever that payouts from SSI will exceed revenues, and according to those pesky SSI Trustee’s (the people paid to run the program, and you know… make sure people get SSI… those nasty right wing number crunchers) the program will be totally broke by 2037 if something “drastic” isn’t done.
    .
    Random Financial fact on Taxes: In 1950 28% of the U.S. population paid no income tax, now its 45-50%. I’m sure that’s just because we now have 45% of the country under the poverty level…
    .
    At the state and local level, my research is totally incomplete, (some localities are LOATH to give up this information, but this is still sad since it’s one of my specialties in political science) but for now I’ll give you a few facts: Colorado Springs is widely reported to have turned off 1/3 of the street lights in the city. They are asking for citizens to “donate” money to turn them back on. (My car has headlights for a reason, and apparently they work equally well when a city misspends its money this badly!). Ashtabula Ohio County (my current state of residence) has cut back its cops so much that they are telling citizens to buy a gun because the cops can no longer protect them. Chicago Heights IL, now charges if you call 911, as much as $600 just for the phone call. Finally, as of the time of this writing the city of L.A. has 20 days to solve its financial problems before it becomes an issue for a bankruptcy judge. Right now L.A. is not hiring cops and has sent Homicide Detectives home and forced them to stop working a murder case to avoid paying them overtime.
    .
    The final section before we get back to those “fat cats” in Washington: News of the day on the Federal Finances. Tim Geithner today said that Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac (both government backed and basically told what to do by people like Barney Frank) put the real estate boom and bust in motion, and that new rules on federal oversight of quasi-public groups such as t Fanny and Freddie are needed but should wait until the Congress deals with Wall Street. (So let me get this straight, the foundation of the crisis was the mismanagement of two companies the Feds direct (they admit all of this) yet restrictions on those industries that they ADMIT caused the problems has to wait until other industries they don’t control and were victims of Freddy and Fanny are complete… that totally makes sense, never mind me asking the question, it was dumb. Clearly the answer is closing the barn door on the barn the horses haven’t escaped from.) All of that said there was clearly predatory and other bad behavior on Wall St., there always has and probably always will be (cocaine in the 80’s anyone?) But putting 100% of the blame on people you openly admit don’t deserve 100% of the blame… that’s called being embarrassingly full of BS.
    Also Bernanke said today that the deficit will be really high from 2012-2020, 3-4% from 2010-2012 and as high as 9% under the Obama budget from 2012-2020, with the National Debt reaching 100% of GDP by 2020 if not earlier, while given current Obama budget projections just the interest on the debt would be $1 Trillion per year by 2020. In case you don’t realize this, it’s not any sort of overstatement to call that ruinous, actually it’s almost an understatement. To stop this deficit would require the top two tax brackets to be 92% (top) and 86% (second highest) which even liberal democrats said today would be “damaging” to the economy.
    .
    Finally, back to those Washington “fat cats”. This is where I had to sit down, do research and pull out my trusty TI-83 because I was SURE Beck was full of it. I was SO sure he was that I almost didn’t bother.
    .
    Public workers averages: Benefits: $40,785/yr. Pay: $71,462/yr.

    .
    Private workers averages: Benefits: $9,882. Pay: Varies depending on group but an average of the averages ($49,991) puts it close enough to $50,000 to call it $50,000.
    .
    Now when you consider there are almost 2.5 million Federal Employees (not counting people like individuals like Park Service/IRS/Secret Service members or contractors, then it goes up to almost 17 million and was 14.6 million in 2006 according to the Washington post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/05/AR2006100501782.html) you find that if you cut those paychecks and benefits back to private sector workers numbers you can save $60 Billion a year in benefits and $44.5 Billion a year in pay. That’s $104.5 Billion a year in savings, which Beck is actually right according to Sally Struthers (who claims feeding a starving child takes about $600 per year) you can feed 174,166,666.7 starving children a year. This doesn’t even take into account that the average Congressman makes $174,000 a year, but since there are only 435 of them that would only be a drop in the bucket if you cut them back to $50,000 a year.
    .
    This begs the liberal style of question. Why does the United States government intentionally starve 174,166,666 (that’s one hundred seventy four million, one hundred and sixty six thousand six hundred and sixty six) children to death every year by paying federal workers 29.577% more than private business and giving more than four times the benefits? WHAT ABOUT THE STARVING KIDS?!?!
    .
    Finally on why government pay is bad: some will argue that the federal government is more fair than the private sector but that fairness is driving the whole country towards bankruptcy. This didn’t start with Obama, it started decades ago, but we can’t accelerate or even continue it, it has to STOP or this country goes BROKE. Also, let’s just say that everyone gets paid the government paycheck, by the government. The government survives on taxes. So next year they put EVERYONE on their payroll and pay everyone a cool $100,000 at 40% income tax (hey, we’re making $100K we can afford it!). Problem is (and lets keep the numbers really simple here) there’s 10 in the country. We all get paid $100,000 and pay back $40,000 to Ma Government. That’s 40,000×10 or $400,000. Now the government has to pay us (let’s just ignore other fees like military, SSI etc for now) $100,000 each, but only has $400,000 to do it, so they go $600,000 into debt. Next year roles around the county is $600,000 in debt but we still get paid and pay back 40% so they’re only $200,000 in debt… except they paid out $1,000,000 to us… so they’re really in debt $1.2 million. Third year roles around… you see where this is going? This is what massive entitlements do. The government can’t create money without its value going down, only the private sector can do that. Anything else is a slow (or fast) spiral to bankruptcy. Just ask the USSR or FRG (West Germany under the Soviets).
    .
    Bottom line: You spend more than you take it, eventually go run out of money and no one will lend you more, it doesn’t matter if you’re a person, a family, a city, a state a country or even the good old U S of A. Bankruptcy is inevitable if you do this.
    .
    Think it isn’t true? Move to Venezuela and wait a couple years, or go visit Cuba now. When I worked in Costa Rica I visited Cuba illegally twice on vacation (they don’t stamp your passport if you’re nice to them) and it’s a craphole. The medical system there is… well quite frankly medieval if you aren’t a government employee or foreign (I actually met a guy who had his leg amputated at a “free government hospital”, they gave you a choice of painkiller: whiskey or tequila. He was old and swore they didn’t do that anymore, but he got really quiet on the topic when a guy in nice clothes came up and asked my name and then injected himself into our conversation, also our drinks strangely became free when this guy sat down at the table). Very nice people, friendly, personable, hardworking, amazing people honestly… but they hate Castro to the man/woman unless they work for him, the rest are too scared to talk because if they get caught they get shot. No trial, no nothing, marched off and you become fertilizer for a sugarcane plantation. You don’t suppose there’s a reason people from Cuba are willing to risk a raft ride, un-aided by navigation through water full of sharks to get here do you? No, the country they come from is SUCH a paradise that they just want a vigorous swim to get the blood moving, given the chance they’d swim back!

  • newfreedomblog

    “The intention is not to put anybody in jail.

    .
    If by “intention” one does not mean to cause someone else harm, but after awhile harm is caused, what then Ms Pickert?
    .
    The so-called “intention” of the IRS IS to collect taxes, penalties, and if all else fails YOU WILL GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL. That is the enforcement arm of the IRS’s motto and agenda. Is that difficult for your pea-sized brain to comprehend?
    .
    If you think for a mili-second that the IRS will not jail your cute and bubbly brainless self, then please, by all means test the will of the IRS and see if you are not playing cards with a Lesbian jail cell mate who is eyeing you up because you are a cute little white girl from California.

  • lcky9

    Let me see you will be FINED by the IRS if you don’t have insurance= you OWE the Federal government= the same as if you DON’T pay TAXES you OWE the government= pay up or go to jail or have you property taken etc.. have any of you clueless read on WHAT authority the IRS has over CITIZENS? I just love it when the clueless make comments about how the IRS won’t do this or that but have NO CLUE what it is they are ALLOWED to do.. Remember this IF it is not excluded in a bill it is taken it is INCLUDED.. that’s how it works THEREFORE unless it is stipulated within the bill that you CAN NOT be put in jail, have your property taken etc for not having health care it leaves the door wide open for just that to happen.. GROW UP PLEASE..

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Gee, it seems that Conservatives are so used to ignoring the law and the Constitution that they simply assume that everyone else does it too.

  • newfreedomblog

    “You don’t suppose there’s a reason people from Cuba are willing to risk a raft ride, un-aided by navigation through water full of sharks to get here do you?”

    .
    Herein lies the problem, sasquatch, Liberals to the last one believe that they can control the “beast” or government, [which ever name you choose to give it]. They think that by passing this regulation or that law, then “everything is just peachy”. They do not care about anything in their sordid lives so long as it makes them feel good inside. They want a government which is run by a few power hungry individuals, like Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Barack Obama to collectively do good for them and their issues or causes. Rather than be personally responsible and individually independent, they seek the power of numbers to control what they believe to be in the best interests of the masses. Unfortunately those numbers are small, less than 38% of our population. But, they continue to progress towards a universal socialist agenda, with some restrictions.
    .
    The vast majority of the American people are against the agenda of Barack Obama. We know that previous attempts at socialism, like the Cuba you describe, have failed miserably. But, Liberals continue to think “it just might work out this time” They are willing to risk everything this country has been founded upon in order to acheive this end. The problem is, it will be the end. The end of the greatest country the world has ever seen.
    .
    So I ask my liberal friends here to cite to me, show me their proof that a socialized America will succeed. Show us Liberals how you envision a new America that Barack Obama will bring us with his policies. Don’t just cite individual policies, go for the big picture. Tell us exactly what you want to see America to evolve into.
    .
    In a nutshell to save time and trouble reading all the garbage they will spew forth, the liberal agenda will bring about the collaspe of this great nation. We are on the brink of total collaspe. Even George Sorso himself is now predicting a major world-wide collaspe of the world economy. Why? Because you cannot have over 50% of the people living in any country that does not contribute towards their own care or needs. We have become a nation now that has 50% of it’s citizens dependent on the other 50% for their subsistence. Rather than getting out and working to provide for themselves, they wait each month for a check from the Government. Rather than buying food to take home to cook themselves for their family, they get a food (stamp) card so they can purchase the dinner already prepared from the very expensive deli counter. While you and I may eat hotdogs occassionally to make our budgets last for the month, my welfare friends and neighbors eat steak. They eat it because I am stupid enough to send in my tax dollars each and everyday to the BIG FEDERAL GOVERNMENT the Liberals have created. Because that is what liberals want for America. Take from those who have, and give to those who are too lazy to get out and work for it.

  • 53_3

    I think freeinpa’s charges of “race baiting” are preemptive.
    .
    You see, O’Reilly isn’t exactly a paragon on that particular front.
    .
    What freeinpa needs is new heroes. See for yourself:

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Time for a Roseanne Rosanadanna moment
    .
    Remember this IF it is not excluded in a bill it is taken it is INCLUDED.. that’s how it works THEREFORE unless it is stipulated within the bill that you CAN NOT be put in jail,
    .
    Ahem…
    .
    From the post:
    .
    This is true, the reform law expressly prohibits the government from jailing anyone who fails to either obtain health insurance or pay a tax penalty
    .
    Oh……
    .
    Never mind…..

  • 53_3

    Careful patrick, 2/3rds has threatened other tetrapods in the swamp before.
    .
    He is your stereotypical(*1) teabagger. He’s one of the many who have helped give the Tea Party(*2) a bad name.
    .
    (*1) Freeinpa is right about the First Amendment rights of his peers, but really, 2/3rds and other teabaggers(*2) have a conundrum:
    .
    If they defend their peers’ conduct under the First Amendment, then they have no reason to object when they are perceived as violent, intolerant, and hateful.
    .
    (*2) Yes! That is their real name now, but, as I’ve mentioned before, with more than a digital chuckle or two, in the movement’s infancy, they did, yes, indeed call themselves:
    .
    teabaggers
    .
    Now, much as others like the march of progress, I’m a traditionalist, and I believe that their original name is much more descriptive.

  • 53_3

    I had to remind myself, those posts were so long. Why don’t they just post links? Must take an hour to compose those comments!
    .
    This is Thoosday. This is thoosday. This is thursday…

  • nflfoghorn

    Shhh. Their intellectual superiority is on display. Don’t disturb them :)

  • jeriv

    Not true!

    As soon as a law passes that they don’t like, they pull the Constitution out of whatever dusty drawer they had it in and use it as a bludgeon against absolutely everything.

    New law I don’t like! It’s illegal! *whack*
    President I don’t like! He’s illegal! *whack*
    I don’t like the direction taken by my lawfully elected representatives! I have the right to secede! *whack*
    There’s a stain in my jacket! *whack*
    Give me back my country! *whack*

    Btw, “give me back my country”. What the heck. Exactly who took it away? I can’t help but wonder why they think someone took their country away. What, exactly, is so different today than say 2 years ago. Ah, a new President. What’s so different about him? Oh… yeah……

  • nflfoghorn

    I’m just amazed that seven (eight?) women thought Larry was actually cute!
    .
    The two kids from his latest failed marriage are ages 11 and 8.
    .
    Teacher: So nice of you to bring your great- grandfather to open house!
    .
    Kid: Uh…. ;)

  • jeriv

    LOL! :-)
    .
    Those posts are actually go into a new category of “posts I don’t read”.
    .
    1) First category is the ALL CAPS posts. Dang, but those are unreadable.
    .
    2) Posts that are 2-3 times as long as the original post, written by the actual reporter. If these anonymous posters can’t actually make their point without writting a thesis on it, and taking you on a wild journey into their imagination, complete with twisted loops of logic (and illogic) which may or may not be totally made up, I’m going to guess the validity of their point is probably not that very good.

  • Ivy_B

    Well, there was a warning at the beginning…

    A couple days ago I was getting high with a friend of mine who’s pretty darn conservative and he pretty much forced me to watch Glenn Beck.

  • drsam8

    Good work by the media on this. The FOX (False) News, the Tea Baggers, Palin, Bachmann and co. keep shouting words like freedom, taxes, defit, jail and so forth to inflame and misinform the gullible. The media, members of Congress and the Obama administration should be calling them out specifically on their lies. Freedom was lost and drastically challenged during the Bush years through such mechanisms as the Patriot Act and the witch-hunting that followed 9/11. About tax, so many Americans–more than 90 per cenet have received tax cut under the Obama administration and taxes are at an all-time low. On deficit, it was Bush that baloomed the deficit and Republican administration usuall spend like drunken sailors when they come into office while Democratic ones try to fix things and clean up the mess. And on jail, this New York Time piece proves that it has been one tall, naked, most blatant BIG LIE by Fox news. Don’t expect them to apologize though. It is not in their character.
    Dr. Sam

  • kbanginmotown

    JC: Yes! Thursday! And not a moment too soon.
    .
    Seems like we’ve been on an insult-fest all week, and, as Cliff pointed out, it really is a game for certain commentors.
    .
    (Cliff: Good catch, BTW. I seem to recall Rusty making a similar statement a couple of years back when he was welcoming a new RWer into the fold. Something to the effect of “pushing the liberals’ buttons for entertainment.” Not a direct quote, but you get the drift. Sad, really.)

  • 53_3

    I think while Sasquatch was high, his friend, in a fit of hilarity, securely fastened his tongue to the TV screen with superglue.

  • 53_3

    “…YOU WILL GO DIRECTLY TO JAIL.”
    .
    I see Newfreedomblog thinks this is a giant Monopoly game. The question is, do we, or do we not get to collect the $200? And I have my “Get Out of Jail Free” card. Can I use that?

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    Wait…you guys are arguing over a fictional tv station?
    Really?
    B.O. is so full of it, I’m surprised he can even get off the toilet. That’s what he’s fed, that’s what he regurgitates.
    Simple.
    .
    If you want news, go to NBC, CBS, ABC, even the BBC, for crying out loud.
    If you want cartoons?
    L( ‘)( ‘)K to FOX.

  • http://www.1hand-up.com activecitizen54

    I noticed that the rhetoric has substantially less Rupert Murdock / Roger Ailes tabloid yellow-journalism tone since the Main Stream Media began a push-back on fact checking but after a decade of Bush; what are a few facts between friends.
    The largest transfer of wealth from the US Taxpayer to the Oligarchy in history didn’t happen.
    Two (actually 3 or 4) wars founded on lies and fraud didn’t happen.
    Illegal wiretaps didn’t happen,
    There wasn’t a “political” department of Justice and torture is legal.
    Socialize the loss and privatize the profits isn’t the Corporate Communists desire.
    Wall Street, Bankers, the Corporate Communists have gotten their pay-off and bail-out at Main Street’s expense.
    Faux Noise has no relevance in media; it’s long been a Republican Cults of Jesus mouthpiece and we are sophisticated enough to recognize the lies.
    That goes for Politicians too but they are bought for different reasons.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    so…some think the one comedian accounts for something other than “real government” ?
    And the official count is…
    1 comedian
    1 military
    1 engineer
    1 economist
    2 journalists
    3 medical practitioners
    6 teachers
    (and where the real problem is…)
    13 people making a career out of the government
    14 business personnel
    and 58 lawyers.
    .
    d=))

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    “Since then he has sold his soul to Alaskan wolves.”
    Really? Are there any left? Since your girlfriend is so fond of killing as many as she can (and, I’m fairly certain she hasn’t yet eaten a single one of them) and attempted to get bounty put on them.

  • jymallyn

    There is a mental condition caused by listening to Faux Noise called the “Obama Derangement Syndrome.”

    It is the same delusional behavior that had the “silent majority” worshiping Spiro Agnew.

    And it proves that you CAN fool some of the people all of the time.

    Obama Derangement Syndrome is more polite than calling the condition “Fecalis Mentalis” but “sh*t-for-brains” may be un-subtle enough for the idiots to understand my disgust at their stupidity and gullibility.

  • jymallyn

    Beck IS an alcoholic. Alcoholics don’t know when they are lying even when they are sober.

    However…
    A couple days ago I was getting high with a friend of mine who’s pretty darn conservative and he pretty much forced me to watch Glenn Beck.

    Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/04/14/jail-time-for-insurance-evaders-yes-said-fox-news/comment-page-2/#comment-155768#ixzz0lBSuuXPl

    I think you have not only documented your gullibility, but have documented what I discovered in college 40 years ago that rational thinking and dope DON’T go together.

    You are a classic case of “Fecalis Mentalis.”

  • slicerpro

    Okay, quit already, because this argument is not going anywhere. An idiot will always see facts as lies and lies as gospel truth, no matter the amount of prove you may provide.

  • ak331

    I read the whole blog reference and except for Beck and Napolitano which is an opinion show rest was either said by a congressman, foxnews contributor or was repeated by the show’s host and not stated himself as a news item.

    but if you think that is outrageous you should see the executive order 12425 which should be more concerning to all the people in the country but we all have our own agenda and priorities to tow, follow or live with.

  • tncekm

    Okay sheeple, tell me this: What happens when you don’t pay your taxes? The IRS goes after you. That can lead to jail time.

    Now, what the bill prohibits the IRS from doing is “auditing people” to ensure that they HAVE health insurance. If they do find out you’re without insurance and you’re not paying TAXES then you can go to jail for TAX EVASION!

    Refer to Section 7201 of the IRS code – felony wilful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.

    You idiots are letting politicians outsmart you with ridiculous semantic tricks and distraction. The fact is you CAN go to jail for willfully refusing to purchase a health plan if you can afford it.

  • ak331

    dear tncekm,

    These lefty will deny that till the end of time as you are correct in pointing out.

    By the way congressman weiner of newyork was on O’reilly show did not answer the question what would happen when IRS does find out that you are culprit in evasion of your tax/fine/surcharge/penalty obligation and to me that really answered the question that they don’t want to spell the consequences on national TV and they would rather dodge the question and hope that everybody finds out after election of congressmen/women in 2010 of OBAMA re-election in 2012 then the game will be over according to them.

  • sasquatch08

    So let me get this right, just to make sure I’m not still on the acid I ate a few years ago:
    .
    Beck’s an alcoholic so no matter what nothing he says can ever be right, Conservatives roll up the Constitution and beat people with it and not one of you has anything to say about the substance of my statement other than that I must have been superglued to a TV…
    .
    Remind me why I talk to you? I threw out dozens of FACTS, which none of you even debate, hence I take it you admit them to be correct.
    .
    Ignoring newfreedomblog/Rusty whatever you people call him…
    .
    You all openly admit that the United States will be basically bankrupt in the next 20 years under the plans you support, yet you think these are still a good idea. Even when we do go bankrupt the “social justice” will go down the drain because there’s no money to pay for it. You all openly admit that you’re plans are doomed to failure. Nice. Thanks, you have now proved that you are all insane and there is no one on this blog worth talking to other than Patrickstartor who actually might defend his point of view and do so in a civilized way.
    .
    My libertarian butt shall now ignore the rest of you since you’ve already agreed that I am right, we’re going broke and you support that. (I could extrapolate your agreement/views, but I don’t need to, I now know how you feel about the country).

  • 53_3

    Did anybody tell you that that is part of the tax code? I mean, didn’t you just say that yourself? Did you even hear yourself think it as you wrote it down?
    .
    That is part of the tax code and has nothing to do with health insurance!

  • sacredh

    “Can you name a Federal paper pusher you love so much you’d give them a bigger paycheck than you as well as four times the benefits?”
    .
    C’mon somebody. Defend me. Show some love.

  • rickcomatica

    I was angry that those I trusted and admired for bringing me the News were accused of being less than truthful with me.
    They invited me to a luncheon.
    When I arrived for lunch with Hanniity, Beck and O’Reilly, They grabbed me and brought me to the back-room where all the lies were made-up and showed me how easy it was to make-up stuff about people.
    Hannity said it wasn’t really lying, because only idiots listened to him and they like the silly lies he tells.
    Beck said, “On his Planet there were people whose job it was, was to make-up stories about famous persons people like to make them not be liked any more.”
    The other one slapped me and said all he cared about was banging the young girls who think he is a star. He told be to go back and tell all the Nit-wits if they don’t like hearing him lie to listen to some anti-lying Network other than his.
    “We’re paid to lie to you, stupid”, they screamed at me.
    Did that mean we weren’t having lunch?
    “This is your lunch, you stupid American Citizen.”
    They laughed, gave me the finger and told me to get-out and go to hell.
    “We’re ALWAYS out to lunch. Always. We get paid to be out to lunch. Don’t forget it!”

  • scheppel

    Wow. I learn something new everyday.

  • http://www.cons-lie.com The_Conservative_Lie

    I simply cannot believe that Faux still has any credibility with anyone, and yet… they do.

    It is a good post and 100% accurate, but the pretext is so predictable as to be boring at this point. The already converted Faux audience only watches and listens to validate their preconceived notions and no amount of pointing out the obvious is going to sway them.

    Most of the rest of us already know it is a sham of a news organization, and those who don’t know, don’t care one way or the other.

    That being said, someone still has to continue to point out the blatant bias and fraud that is Fox News.

  • maverick2k9

    sasquatch08,
    .
    Pretty long post about the problems.
    .
    BUT you failed to cover the most important part – Glenn Beck’s “The Plan” :
    .
    i.e. Solutions to these problems:
    .
    1. Replace all personal federal taxes with an 11 percent flat tax on personal unadjusted gross income, and an 11 percent Value Added Tax (VAT).
    .
    i.e Increase taxes on the poor/middle class and cut taxes for the super-rich.
    .
    2. Social security – Some crap about linking it to the person’s age.
    .
    i.e Put some holes in the social safety “net”. So what happens to the people who fall thru the hole. Tough sh%t..
    .
    3. Medicare – age of 65, you give them a federal $11,000 voucher.
    .
    i.e. Tough sh%t again, if you catch something other than the common cold.
    .
    3. Elimination of all foreign aid
    .
    i.e. no $3 billion aid to Israel (not that I mind!!).
    .
    .

    Yes, We can.. Bleck for President 2012, to implement all of the above.

    PS: I am not sure even sasquatch will vote for Bleck and “The Plan”.

  • therealbuh

    I like how all the these quotes are from Nov. of ’09 when no one really knew what was in the bill.Since we had to “pass it to know what was in it”. A lot of people that voted FOR it didnt even know what was in it when or after they did so. Do you have anythin that anyone there said lately? probably not as they probably realized that jail wasn’t going to happen.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    Sasquatch, correct. Beck has little or no idea or ideology of political trappings, but, he does like to make a fast buck, and has found the key to same. Throw in an obnoxious, hate filled comment complete with dripping sarcasm and “truth” is not a requirement.
    .
    http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/0426/entertainment-fox-news-simon-schuster-glenn-beck-inc.html?boxes=Homepagechannels
    .
    Newfreedonblog…
    “Liberals to the last one believe that they can control the “beast” or government,”
    Well, no. You may want to retract that.
    No one group can be said to follow the same points of interest throughout its population.
    Consider teabaggers, for example.
    Lower taxes…even though that would mean that services that are so gratuitously taken for granted will flee (including the roads you travel on, the schools you send your children to, the social security payments yo will be expecting when you turn 62-67, the mail service, your local police and fire, as well as telephone service)
    Another branch of teabaggers are a wild card concern…those who dabble in terrorism, and that isn’t even American in spirit or practice.
    The Thomas Paine teabaggers, following nut cases like funbobbasso (youtube resident loudmouth) and Sarah Palin who have nothing to lose or gain from making asses out of themselves because, like Beck, they are gaining fame and fortune by screaming atrocious lies at everybody and calling then ideals to attain by ‘real Americans’
    Withing each said group (three named, there are more) there are semi anarchists, the klan, (or, if they traded sheet for suit and tie, Birchers) and gosh, for the rhyme, birthers, hard corps Republicans, along with a healthy dose of Republican’ts, and people who just don’t know what to think because they are so confused.
    Teabaggers have so many directions that the whole of the group DOES NOT want to follow because it runs contrary to their belief systems.
    What? An example? Sure
    Less government interference also means the seat belt laws get rescinded, gay marriage is OK, and pot goes legal tomorrow.
    (Well, I wish it would. I’m one of the tens of thousands of people who can make a profit from it by making paper and canvas)
    All</b. of no group are of the same mind.
    Sadly, the bigger a system is, the more imperfect it is.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    newfreedomblog.
    what a strange way to have a debate.
    So, your intention is to shirk whatever tax there is?
    Feel free to write us when you’ve made that full commitment. We’de be interested in the outcome.
    Perhaps that means you’re already shirking your taxes?
    (best not answer that one, eh?)
    .
    Last I looked, taxes come out of paycheck, I beg the government for as much back as possible in April.
    Heck, prison time never comes up.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    they take the taxes through your paycheck.
    you beg for some back
    just like normal.
    .
    you’ll complain bitterly if you want.
    That’s your choice.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    Jeriv, that’s cold.
    We’re moving out of Iraq, getting serious about the original job (thanx again, W junior) at least have a health care package winding its way through the system with a chance to slow down the drain on HHR, grab that clown in the mountains, and get back to help build a new America.
    That sounds GOOD!
    A BIG difference, begging your pardon.
    but then, you and Paul Dirks seem capable in plucking some fine humor from this.
    Couldn’t help but to be impressed.

  • vintel7

    It’s disturbing that right wing weirdos like Hannity, Beck, and O’Reilly think they can twist and make up reality as they go along. It is so delusional it is sickening. Yet, it is characteristic of the republicans that when they don’t like a particular truth,they twist it into whatever they want.

  • vintel7

    It is absolutely false and the Health Reform Law specifically states otherwise. Look at the law before you comment so that you know what you are talking about. You can NOT go to jail for failing to have health insurance. That is a COMPLETE LIE.

  • http://chuckterzella.wordpress.com chuckterzella

    This can all be easily rectified to both Liberal’s and Conservatives satisfaction…

    Mr.’s Hannity, Beck, et al, just need to go on their programs and, citing the particular broadcasts, say, “You know, we were completely wrong about the whole ‘going to jail’ statements both we and our guests made. We make a lot of money you see, so we figured we’d be taxed on some of our millions and millions of dollars and we don’t want to have to give any of our money to allow lower income and middle class Americans (some of whom are our listeners) who can’t afford coverage for their families to get any. That would be Socialism you see, all that ‘paying our fair share’ garbage. We got rich, so so should you. If you’re not, it’s your own fault, so don’t come crying to us.

    “So anyway, we lied. We lie a lot, so you should expect it. It’salways worked before, but this time we got caught. Anyway, what’s the big deal? Is that any reason for us to apologize or our listeners to stop listening? I mean, get a grip. Go join a Tea Prty or something.”

  • allenewood

    I thought the journalists at Time magazine were better than this. I’m sure you did your “research”, but you failed to report on the most obvious fact, and because it’s so obvious leads me to believe it was left out on purpose to paint fox news as an untrustworthy news source.

    The fact that all these people commenting are oblivious to what I’m about to mention, but so willfully commend this article as “good journalism” really disappoints me.

    I’m not a blogger, tweeter, or whatever else. This is my first comment on a blog or news article. I’m sorry, but I don’t live in this world, but I’m stopping by to say “Time out”. I hardly follow political news in fact, because I find it to always be the same dry load of crap, but let me fill you people in on the full story here.

    The health bill at the time in November that was not passed would have sent people to jail for avoiding health insurance. At the time it was not only Fox news’ responsibility to report on this, but the rest of the country too. So at the time it was true, but Fox news never said you would go to jail with the newest health care bill that was passed.

    A congressman or representative, someone accidentally said that Fox news had said you would go to jail for avoiding health insurance on the “new” bill, but that’s actually false, they have not.

    So let me summarize.

    Old bill – jail.
    Fox news – shouts “hey thats not right”
    New bill – no jail.
    Fox news – does not shout “hey you’re going to jail”.
    Political figure – “Fox news said you’ll go to jail”.
    Time Magazine – “Fox news said you’ll go to jail”.
    Fox news – “No we didn’t”.
    Time Magazine – Out of context, “Yes you did”.

    And let the games continue…

  • wizardfrobozz

    Did you equate Fox News with WWE wrestling?! Seems Appropriate!

  • ak331

    Of course everybody is right as Obama, Palosi, and IRS commissioner all dodged the question when asked in November of 2009. Weiner dodged in april 2010 and now time along with lame stream media is gunghoe on fox news and spinning their version. This include Joe Kline, Grey Lady bailout recipient NBC arm of GE and other irrelevant network which used to be big.

    Left has dropped the ball and now trying to spin to contain the damage as people have woken up to Obama Agenda as they have been called Astroturf, right wing extremist, uneducated, stupid, bible thumper, gun totting, Even Nazi.

    New York times poll made them liars and now they have to deal with their previous spin which has proven to be wrong. They did not see results of Virgina, New Jersey and MA election results and I am sure did not expect it either.

    Remember what Palosi and Obama said that you have to pass the Health care bill or for that matter any bill last year to see what is in it. More we read we find out they are not working for people but their own fundraisers and they did not even %#^%$ read the bill and are finding out so that their own staff has been left out of the health care coverage. Consider that this congress did miss not only parts of bill which is shameful but now want to fix it for their staff.

    What a shame that they don’t understand constitution, can not read and think they are above the comstitution.

  • http://whatchannelareyouwatching.com Stephen Fofanoff

    http://wp.me/pwg7T-9g

    Fox is just dumb–or deceitful. They get caught regularly in their web of lies by people of intelligence who know how to use a DVR.

  • http://chuckterzella.wordpress.com chuckterzella

    Ah, A Michael Savage listener, or should I say a Michael Wiener listener…What else would you expect from a member of the “Wiener Nation”?

  • deusxmchna

    I was a dyed-in-the-wool GOP’er before FauxNews pushed the party to the extreme right. All in the name of profits, using the name of Prophets. Rush had been bellowing for about as long as I can remember, but the conservative movement didn’t go over the edge (and it’s members followed over that cliff like lemmings) until the 24hr news cycle, and Faux scaring people into a cult following.
    It’s pitiful how many people sit watch people tell them what they should think- this goes for anyone watching the talking heads on any channel. Instead of watching the actual happenings on CSPAN live, or reading factual materials- they’d rather have it twisted, turned, dumbed down, and spoon-fed to them. Buzzwords like “socialism” & “communism” are thrown around so inaccurately that I can’t decide if the writers don’t understand the meaning (and are trying to fan the flames and fears), or if they are simply trying to fan and flame the fears.
    It’s just pathetic that the average American has become so ignorant of our government, and political issues, because they’re too lazy to form their own opinion.
    Dem or Rep- it doesn’t matter. They’re two sides of the same corroded coin, whose only purpose is to keep their butts in power, comfort, and cash.
    (don’t anyone bother replying to this. I won’t be following this thread of people who believe in FauxNews or the people who are spending the whole day trying to convince them not to.)
    P.S.- There’s an interesting documentary on FauxNews called Outfoxed. It has to be taken with a grain of salt because of who produced it- but it’s interesting nevertheless- watch it whichever side you happen to be on)

  • drawboy

    All the he-said/she-said/what-do-you-know-and-when-did-you-know-it nonsense by the numerous haters above aside, the fact remains that IRS power to police and enforce the mandatory purchase of health care insurance as part of of federal tax compliance ensures that offenders will be subject to prosecution, conviction and confinement. Based on ObamaCare’s design, prosecution will be no idle threat. Guaranteed issue guarantees that medical costs will literally skyrocket unless everyone pays for a policy (and even then, they’re going to go through the roof). Ain’t no way Big Brother is going to let any free-thinking and free-acting individual abide by the Constitution to kick sand in its face, lest it start a trend. Early scofflaws will be singled out, prosecuted and sent to prison in high-profile, well-publicized trials intended to intimidate the rest of us into conformity.

  • http://jonwrightroofing.wordpress.com Jon Wright Roofing

    This is only the beginning….

  • sacredh

    Or the beginning of the end. I love metaphysics.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Sasquatch, what a fitting name for your constantly lame attempts at wit. Most times, your responses are pathetic and to your credit consistently inane! Gosh!

    And to the Maxwell the yellow stray dog :) , You Dog — also aptly self described. Emmm….dog (no fleas, I hope)–emm, I am quite sure there are still many wolves in Alaska.
    Whether Palin eats them or not??? Are you her cook. What a silly and asinine remark.

    People shoot animals and other predatory “animals” for different reasons. Some to eat, some in self defense and others for other reasons. It is not illegal or wrong to do so in designated areas.

    The population of these animals in many cases needs to be contained. They like other predatory beasts can be hunted and killed so long as the laws are not broken.

    Ps: If a wild animal jumps on someone to do them harm and take their lives, I belong to the school of thought that thinks you should shoot the animal before it can harm you.
    That is of course if the animal is clearly in view or is a clear target that you can take down.
    Sometimes in the night, it might not be safe to shoot because you could end up hurting someone or some other harmless animal.

    Shooting and gun ownership are all rights. Not to be abused of course as the Right wing fringe of the Republican party emm I mean Tea party folks appear to be determined to do.

    However, there are sometimes when shooting and killing these predators is always a great relief for residents and others whom these creatures under the cover of darkness or in hiding try to violate.

    They should be killed, such violent and vile predators, I mean.

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    “Predators” in Alaska…
    Well, oil hunters. Good lord, that day is over.
    Sell your SUVs and big trucks, oil’s claim to fame is done. There WILL be a change, and the sooner America gets off the can and gets to work, the smoother it will happen and the sooner we can get off the tit of the middle east.
    Another predator is a little less obvious…(don’t take this personally)… lawyers still patching any holes left by the Exxon group for their way wrong doing. As it stands now, Alaska is forever damaged by a drunk and his first mate, and somehow, Exxon has worked straight away to close the valve of fixing their negligence.
    Seriously, how is it that some people get paid for claiming a third payment of something they only talked into existence?
    Another predator would be hunters looking to alter the long established natural environmental rules, only to create a baited area to attract elk.
    I suppose it has escaped your notice that Palin’s ONLY reason for the wolf hunt is to expand the elk population and therefore bring in hunters (with money) to kill (what they’ll probably later call an infestation) that group.
    .
    You can whine about it from different angles if you want, but, the second amendment is not permission to own and carry firearms. It is permission to join the militia (are you a member of one of those?) to then be able to defend the country against foreign attack.
    But this in itself is two things.
    #1 Outrageous. You stick your little peashooter (I don’t care what caliber it is) out the door and fire it at a government and you’ll find rockets red glare on your hide.
    #2 Off topic.
    (The only “silly or asinine” remark was yours when you claimed I misquoted the bible. I never misquote the bible. Those were MY words to live by. Love the creation with your heart mind and soul, and help others as best as you can. I was remiss in not going back to finish my statements to you, as your interest was in attacking cyber fraud. I only went in the first place to tell you of a book DANCING WITH THIEVES by J Cosmo Newbery but generally had no idea if you even monitored your blog.
    But your charm and ‘wit’ was as abrasive there, then as it is here)

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Maxwell dog,

    Always so vociferous. *sigh* You really get into running or swimming a LOT— or do something that will put all that vitriol out of you. So bitter. Really pathetic. Poor sod.

    Wolves are PREDATORS and I cannot be bothered to explain the rest of my post to you.

    I suggest you examine your intellect which appears consistently weak–especially regarding your constant “do not take it personal nonsense” when you are making being personal and crass remarks—-

    and also personally evaluate your emotional maturity. You always seem to be frothing over so many many many issues.

    Again, as I stated, if people want to hunt and shoot, they should be able to do so. They are protected under the law.

    Also, let me repeat, if attacked by a predatory animal that has the courage to do so face to face in full view, I would advise any gun owner to SHOOT and SHOOT to protect themselves.

    It is not that complex.

    There are animals which prey on humans and their lives cannot be measured or compared with human life. The life of the law abiding human takes precedence every time.

    So Yes, they should be SHOT and killed when they attack humans. Innocent, law abiding humans.

    I will always support human life over that of any predatory animals any day. Predatory animals which attack humans should be SHOT.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    To the dog, Maxwell:

    “Shooting and gun ownership are all rights. Not to be abused of course as the Right wing fringe of the Republican party emm I mean Tea party folks appear to be determined to do.”

    (This is an excerpt from my original response)

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    As for your ‘medicinal’ and ‘therapeutic’ replies, I have to pass. I work plenty hard, chop wood for heat all Winter and am now clearing land at the ranch.
    Anyway, your training is in lying, not physical rehabilitation. You’re a lawyer…that’s what they do.
    .
    I only meant to not take offense as long as you’re not one of those ticks making the Exxon/Mobil affair blameless. If you ARE one of those lawyers, please feel free to run out of ammo just as the polar bear is leaping.
    .
    What you have against nature, I don’t know. What you leave out of the conversation is what in the name of heaven are people doing up there that don’t belong there.
    Wild animals…that is such a laugh.
    In Indiana they shoot deer (or, like the two fellows a dozen years ago, coaxing deer up close enough with food and hacking away at them with machetes) and they say it is to keep the population down.
    Palin has in mind wiping out the wolf population to therefore create an elk over population that hunters can then kill.
    Geez.
    What nonsense.
    No mam. You are mistaken, if that’s the side of the fence you stand on. Owning a gun is NOT so much a right as you put it.
    (Lawyers…)
    The amendment reads as thus:
    2. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
    Where do you read your interpretation? I see NOWHERE that the people of this nation are free to wander about shooting animals that they consider “predatory”…that would lead to unbridled chaos.
    Good day to you, mam.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Reply to Maxwell aka Stuart “szech” Dog Bleh!

    Your response was just in line with others was expected Silly nonsense self justification.

    “I work plenty hard, chop wood for heat all Winter and am now clearing land at the ranch”.
    Uh huh, you forgot to add that you also shave with shards of glass.
    What a pile of self serving bunk and nonsense. How typical. Rubbish and more rubbish.

    Well, just to be as polite as I was taught, I am going to stifle my utter disdain and disregard for your and your foolish antics just this once, and provide you information on the latest case law on the matter of gun ownership– and the court interpretation.

    I hope you know the Judiciary interprets the law not the Executive or Legislative arm (Separation of Powers in our “Presidential” system of Govt).
    —————————

    District of Columbia, et al. v. Dick Anthony Heller

    Docket nos. 07-290 Citations 554 U.S. ___; 128 S. Ct. 2783; 171 L. Ed. 2d 637; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5268; 76 U.S.L.W. 4631; 21 Fla. L

    Holding:

    “The Second Amendment guarantees an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. Court membership”.

    ——————–

    I know that in real time, considering you and your posts here, I would have no banter with you let alone have these exchanges.

    I am sure there are others who support criminals, crooks and liars that target innocent women online but I am not one of those folks.

    Anyhow, as I said, if a predatory animal attacks a law abiding citizen and is courageous enough to show their face in the day time, then the person attacked should SHOOT and SHOOT.

    The life of a good human being is worth more than that of ANY animal.

    Law abiding folk need to live their lives in peace.

    When animals that normally hide under the cover of “darkness” attack a law abiding citizen it should be shot dead.

    My position in advising the person attacked to shoot to kill the predator is solid and rational.
    Shoot and kill predators without hesitation.

    The life of a law abiding citizen matters more than that of a Predator..
    That is all there is.

    Your other wide and unrelated comments are an index of the girth of your mind and require no response from me.
    I made a reference to your weak intellect. You will be well served to review your mind. Although I doubt it would make any difference. You are what you are.

    You completely bore me with your silly and inane remarks and antics. You are like vomit.

    LM

    http://bestrongbehappy.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/women-implant-in-yourself-the-ideals-you-cherish/

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    It really makes sense that you call this “polite”…
    after all, I mentioned you being a lawyer, and you probably took that as a slight on your character.
    But, dang. If OJ had looked at Johnnie Cochran and said, “Oh heck. I did it. But I still don’t want to do time,”
    The lawyer takes that as his goal.
    So, like it or not, that’s what you are..and, sadly, so are some 58 of the Senators in our government, so, maybe that’s why there’s so much trouble with their handling of simple tasks.
    .
    Banter? All you’ve tossed in were your opinions, a piece of lawyer tripe being used to carry firearms, and about the snidest remarks of most of the right wingers you say you aren’t part of.
    Is it any wonder people can’t believe you?
    Dang.
    So much hatred built up inside of yourself.
    Maybe you could use that running/swimming regime you were talking about.
    I was just making a straight forward comment and being polite.

  • icanreadcanu2

    Leftists are patently dishonest. They make it sound like Fox news has deliberately misrepresented the bill when the fact is that the proponents of the bill have so lacked transparency during the process of drafting the legislation that they have proven they cannot be trusted.

    Dick Morris’s November 2009 article on the bill is below and can be google searched. Since the legislative process has been highly secretive and avoided open debate or disclosure we can be pardoned if we didn’t know that the jail time was removed. At one point it was there.

    There have been so many changes on the fly that it is hard to keep up with the people busy taking away our freedoms. Was the jail penalty eliminated in the final changes after the bill was passed? I don’t know for certain, but forgive me for finding it perfectly credible that people willing to trample on the constitution and force people to buy a commercial product in contradiction to their rights would find it perfectly natural to send them to jail. This is exactly why we cannot trust democrats to legislate.

    :
    Pelosi bill: Jail for no insurance
    By Dick Morris – 11/08/09 02:18 PM ET
    By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

    The nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation reported that the House version of the healthcare bill specifies that those who don’t buy health insurance and do not pay the fine of about 2.5 percent of their income for failing to do so can face a penalty of up to five years in prison!

    The bill describes the penalties as follows:

    • Section 7203 — misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

    • Section 7201 — felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

    That anyone should face prison for not buying health insurance is simply incredible.

    And how much will the stay-out-of-jail insurance cost? The Joint Committee noted that “according to a recent analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, the lowest-cost family non-group plan under HR 3862 [the Pelosi bill] would cost $15,000 by 2016.”

    Obama’s bill only provides subsidies to help pay this enormous sum after families making about $45,000 have paid 8 percent of their income for insurance and after those earning a household income of about $65,000 have kicked in 12 percent.

    The Joint Committee on Taxation noted that while the Senate Finance Committee version of the bill did not include criminal penalties, “The House Democrats’ bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.”

  • nocalls4jeff

    My only question to the author: how did FOX news know what was going to be in the final health care bill as all your proof here is from 2009 (knowing the health care bill passed in 2010)?

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    from the folks at Huffington Post

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog
  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog
  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    that’s what they were fed by Republican’ts….

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    It really makes sense that you call this “polite”…
    after all, I mentioned you being a lawyer, and you probably took that as a slight on your character.
    But, dang. If OJ had looked at Johnnie Cochran and said, “Oh heck. I did it. But I still don’t want to do time,”
    The lawyer takes that as his goal.
    So, like it or not, that’s what you are..and, sadly, so are some 58 of the Senators in our government, so, maybe that’s why there’s so much trouble with their handling of simple tasks.
    .
    Banter? All you’ve tossed in were your opinions, a piece of lawyer tripe being used to carry firearms, and about the snidest remarks of most of the right wingers you say you aren’t part of.
    Is it any wonder people can’t believe you?
    Dang.
    So much hatred built up inside of yourself.
    Maybe you could use that running/swimming regime you were talking about.
    I was just making a straight forward comment and being polite.

    From Maxwell Dog, the all around dog
    __________________________

    My Reply

    Engage people who consider YOU worth engaging. These comments I have made thus far are for the sake of posterity.

    As I stated, Predators who attack law abiding humans should be SHOT. And Yes, it is my opinion and those of many others who think the life of a law abiding citizen is worth more than that of a predatory animal.

    I have heard of instances where predators attacked in full view thinking they were obscured and were shot in the head by the law abiding. Innocent folk they attacked in broad day light.

    Their brood is sometimes killed by fellow predators.

    You are the same poster who said it was okay to violate, brutally and savagely molest and maybe even kill a woman using technology enabled criminality because such occurrences were not rampant and probably occurred to one or two women.
    Those and your other remarks read like those of a woman beater, abuser and violator of the female sex.

    Your inauthentic comments under any alias, stink.

    Go to someone who considers you something. Impolite or not, I have made unequivocal my position on you.

    You are like vomit, and your comments inauthentic and your rambling comments and efforts at personal attacks inane or infantile. You are just what you are!

    You need to seek out others of your ilk here and elsewhere for these wild and senseless outbursts.
    I do not belong to the group of people who would engage you in real time– because of what you are.

    This exchange is really just a waste. We exist in parallel worlds and no matter what happens, You will be what you are, and I will always be WHO I AM.

    This running commentary is really really really boring me. You bore me. Yawnnn.

    LM
    http://bestrongbehappy.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/women-implant-in-yourself-the-ideals-you-cherish/

  • fmcfm

    Actually the threat of jail time WAS in the House version of the bill that was signed just before Christmas. The quotes you dug up were talking about that bill (look at their dates, all November 09), so they were accurate.

    It’s true that jailtime is not in the LAW, but it WAS considered, and almost made it. At least until the stregth of the ongoing opposition became apparent, and the election of Scott Brown squelched any chance of Demeocrats voting for a legitimate conferenced version.

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    Dang. Lawyer mommy…you have what? No feeling about the topic here or are you just that self centered?
    Have you even heard of politeness or is your right wing stuck in just-keep-plugging-along mode with the same tired rhetoric?
    .
    Do you remember what the topic is?
    .
    Do you have any thoughts on that or do you just want to throw your pent-up anger at me while I’m here?
    .

blog comments powered by Disqus