A Personal Note About TIME

I had read TIME Magazine for as long as I could remember, even signed up for my own subscription when I was in college. So when I went to work here more than 15 years ago, I thought I had an appreciation for the power of that red border. But as it turned out, Newt Gingrich was the one who first impressed upon me what it really meant to be working for this extraordinary magazine.

It was October, 1994, the month that I joined TIME from the Los Angeles Times to cover Congress. It was also only a few weeks before what was looking like a potential earthquake of a midterm election. My new editors told me they wanted a story on the firebrand Republican Congressman who was the face of the voter anger that suddenly seemed to be coming from everywhere.

There was a problem, though. Gingrich was barnstorming every convservative corner of America in an eight-seater airplane. Keeping up with him was impossible, as pretty much every political reporter in the country was discovering. At one point, I even went so far as to charter my own plane with a reporter from the Washington Post to get to a rally in Tullahoma, Tennessee. (Yes, younger colleagues, there was a time when when a reporter could put a plane on the expense account…)

But it still wasn’t working. The logistics were killing me. I couldn’t get the kind of close-up view of the guy that I needed to tell this story right. Until I mentioned to someone on his staff that a TIME cover might be in the works. Suddenly, one of those eight seats belonged to me.

As I buckled myself in, I pressed Newt as to why he had relented and let me aboard. He looked at me like I was a little thick for even asking that question. It was the fact that what he was doing had been deemed worthy of the red border. The future Speaker told me, off the top of his head, that Richard Nixon had been on 55 TIME covers. That figure, it turns out, had made an impression on him when it had been cited at Nixon’s funeral earlier that year. (Newt, of course, would go on to see himself there several more times, including as Man of the Year in 1995.)

Since then, I’ve been a writer on more than three dozen of those covers, and hundreds of other stories for TIME. My thrill at seeing my own words in this magazine has never dimmed. But when you are privileged enough to see the process from the inside, you develop a different kind of respect for what it takes to produce TIME week in and week out, to make it what it is. There is not a day that I have worked here that I haven’t grown, thanks to editors who never stop pushing us to aim high and go deep. Or looked a little smarter than I am, thanks to the generosity of fellow correspondents willing to share what’s in their brains and their notebooks. More times than I can count, I’ve been saved from looking as stupid as I deserve to, thanks to a researcher who cares enough to make sure that what I’ve written is not only accurate but right.

So, today, on my last day at this magazine, I’d like to take this moment to thank all of them. That includes many former colleagues who have gone on to other opportunities in this turbulent business and beyond. In recent years, our staff has gotten smaller, even as what we are asked to do has expanded. We no longer publish just once a week; we are out there constantly.

It is a change in the metabolism of the place that has taken us out of our old news cycle–and out of our old comfort zone. I will admit that writing this blog was not my choice; I was, as they say in the Marines, “voluntold.” But as I plunged in, I began to realize that, done right, blogging could make me a better journalist. Where an occasional letter to the editor was what passed for feedback in the old days, we now hear from our readers instantly. They constantly–often brutally–challenge my assumptions and preconceptions, which means I have to do the same thing. I’m grateful for that, too. Plus, blogging has actually turned out to be something I would never have expected — fun. That is one reason I spend so much of my time in the community that has grown out of our comments section.

I’m looking forward to the new challenge that awaits me at the Washington Post. But keep an eye out for me here, too. Every now and then, you might find me weighing in on something down there in the Swampland comments.

Related Topics: changing jobs, journalism, newt gingrich, swampland, time cover, time magazine, Washington Post, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • gysgt213

    KT-We are going to miss you here and I seriously hope you will return to comment. You are a great reporter. One of the things that makes you great is the fact that you actually interact with your readers and take them seriously. You have to know how important that was and is to all of us. Time’s and Swampland’s loss is the Post’s gain. I hope you are excited.

  • http://teacherreaderwriter.wordpress.com/ Shakespeare in GA

    We look forward to it, KT.
    .
    I’m a high-school English teacher and fiction writer, but years ago in undergrad, I flirted with the idea of double majoring in English and journalism. Your writing–insightful, cogent, and pleasurable to read–reminds me of what I found interesting about journalism. You will be missed here. Thank you.

  • kbanginmotown

    What gunny said. (And Shakespeare, and ….)
    .
    Karen: I hope that you’ll find the time to post here and at your new digs. Those of us waaaay outside of the beltway have had an up-close, insider’s view of the sausage factory but, more importantly, we’ve learned and shared critical information and opinions about relevant US policies from you and the rest of the Swamp-critters. I am truly amazed that I stumbled upon Swampland many years ago and thank you for being the key ingredient in it’s and Time’s excellence. Hope to read that book about Bloggin’ in the Boys’ Room someday, too.
    .
    Arrrg. ‘appy Trails over at th’ Post, Matey!

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    Saw your dead-tree article in my local bookstore last week. You’re pretty global for a San Antonian.

    Seriously, all the best KT! And please do stop in from time to time. WaPo, even with your addition, argh.

    Cheers/kanpai

  • Paul-no not that one

    You will be missed KT.
    .
    You have the rare, and admirable, ability to rethink things.
    .
    Plus you really must have been raised right to keep such a cool head when engaging with sometimes intemperate readers. (looking in my mirror)
    .
    Bon Chance with the WAPO.

  • http://jcapan.wordpress.com jcapan

    PS–as a parting shot, care to explain how in the hell a Harvard Bus. School grad wound up a journalist?

  • bobell

    Karen — It’s no secret that you actually care about both what you cover and whom you cover it for, and those of us who follow your posts here (well, okay, most of us) can’t get enough of them. (And now we won’t get any. Tsk.) It’s not just the facts that you dig out and the way you explain their significance and put them in context, It’s also your good humor, and the way you stand up for yourself and your colleagues, and the simple prose that masks art. What were they teaching at HBS when you went through?
    .
    I’m keeping my subscription to the Post alive in part so I can follow you into the next phase of your career. Just do at the Post what you did inside the red border and here in the Swamp, and both the Post and you will be the better for it.
    .
    Godspeed.

  • sevenoaks07

    Karen: I am sorry that you are moving to the Post; have appreciated your posts and your engaging us and sharing your concerns about HCR. I hope you will continue this at the Post and step back in here occasionally.

    A sarky note: I hope you will never tell us that the President took 18 minutes and 12 seconds to answer a question, a la “Soundbyte Kornblut”,without referring to its content.

    All the best…

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    My only regret is that the loss to Time wil be proportionally greater than the gain at WaPo. It’s a big place and it needs a world of fixing. That said, I’m sure congratulations are in order. Rest assured I will keep a sharp eye out for your byline wherever it appears. And if you ever need accomodations in the Virgin Islands………

  • kathy

    Karen: I am going to miss your being here in the Swampland more than I really know how to say. The superiority of commenting to writing a letter is appreciated from this side, too.

    Your integrity and faithfulness to the facts has made TIME worth giving allegiance to. I cringe at the thought that you’re going to what I see as a sinking ship over at WAPO; maybe I’ll have to give them a second chance. It speaks well of them that they wanted you. Guess they have to have a little piece of excellence to balance some of their more recent hires :0)

    Tell us you’ll still blog. (I really don’t want to have to do twitter) Besides, there are some stories that I have come to expect you’ll weigh in on. Over the last couple of years I’ve counted on your point of view informing mine. Our little group kept me sane during the primaries of ’08.

    Most of all I wish you well. You deserve the best.

  • Paul-no not that one

    KT-will you be participating in the On Line Chats that the WAPO hosts?
    .
    I’d guess that’s as natural a fit as can be.

  • tarfunk

    Karen, this is a sad day in Swampland. At different times and in different ways, every single one of your other colleagues here infuriates me, but you always make me calm down and think through an issue rather than just react. That’s a rare gift in blog-world.

  • textee

    Karen Tumulty: “It was also only a few weeks before what was looking like a potential earthquake of a midterm election.”

    I’ll give anyone a quarter for providing any evidence of any political activist working for any political advocacy group like ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, CNN, NPR, the New York Times-Democrat, the Washington Post-Democrat, the Associated (with terrorists) Press, Time magazine, et al., who claimed prior to the 1994 midterm election that the election “was looking like a potential earthquake.”

    Said political activists were as shocked by the 1994 midterm elections as they were by Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan winning 49 out of 50 states. Said political activists still don’t know anyone who voted for Nixon and Reagan ….

  • mackenzie92

    Dear Karen, I do not often comment on your posts on Swampland but read almost all of them and enjoy your articles when they appear in the magazine – they colour the troubles in America with reasoning and hope. It’s sad that you’re leaving, but also true of the power of your words that many readers will follow you on to the Washington Post, where you will clearly continue to bring humanism to journalism. Thank you.

  • Joe Bftsplk

    Just one word:

    WAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!

  • gysgt213

    I’m getting all misty eyed here.

  • southernbell49

    KT, you will be much missed here at Swampland. The only consolation is that you can help stop the slow decline of the WaPo.

  • parodox

    I will miss your blogging, mostly for its integrity. You always reported both sides of the story as honestly as possible and if you had an opinion in the matter you described that seperately. You took your stories much more seriously than your opinions. As G K Chesterton observed.”The reason angels can fly is because they take themselves lightly.” May you continue to soar.

    Good Luck and Godspeed

  • bitterpill8

    KT: I have not joined in the comments for some time as I am abroad. But I have kept an eye on Swampland from here. Very sorry to see you go; but hope WaPo will benefit from your work.

    Best wishes to you and yours.

  • kbanginmotown

    P.S. And please keep us apprised of your brother’s ongoing medical challenges and recovery. He’s in our thoughts as well, thanks to you.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I don’t mean to disparage what’s actually a very nice sentiment but I do feel compelled to point out one thing.
    .
    Most stories don’t HAVE two sides.
    .
    The assumption that they do is one of the infections that lead to lousy reporting. Many things are simply true or false. Identifying which is which is a rather important role that news-gatherers often abdicate.

    I count KT among the few who takes her role of fact-seeker quite seriously. I think we all wish there were more like her.

  • Ivy_B

    Karen, Saying you will be greatly missed is a statement so obvious that it isn’t worthy of your writing! You really found a voice in your blogging and helped to keep our little community together. As kathy said above, I don’t know how I would have made it through the 08 primaries without it.

    The other thing we all appreciated was your intercession with the High Sheriffs, at no time more than after the great crash and the platform switch.

    Your integrity and humor often made my day. Participation in the comments set an example for all others.

    Best wishes at WaPo, we look forward to reading your new work.

  • kbanginmotown

    You’re right, gunny. This is getting *way* too serious…
    .
    Sacred? O Saaaaacred? We need you, buddy!

  • megatronrises

    KT- thank you for all your incisive and insightful reporting. I’ve only recently joined the Swamp, but I have already recognized the value you bring to the Time team and in general to my knowledge of politics and current events.
    .
    This newcomer will miss your integrity and honestly, your d*mn fine reporting!
    .
    Best of luck!

  • tenderfeet

    I frequently read Swampland (though I rarely comment), and I’d like to thank you for all your excellent reporting and posts.

    Best of luck!

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    If he wanders into the newsroom, will you sucker punch Fred Hiatt for me?

    Best of luck KT!

  • deconstructiva

    KT, congrats and best wishes, but I will miss you. I’ll miss your insights, thoughtfulness, humor, and dialogues with us here. Thanks for tolerating our rants too. I hope we entertained YOU. Did you finish packing? I hope you keep everything and just fill up the basement at home with milk crates, but at least the Nixon souvenirs. Don’t burn the tapes. You rock!
    .

    .
    I know this has become a popular funeral song, grrrr. It should celebrate life and positive change instead.

  • sacredh

    Karen, I wish you you the best of luck and I’m going to miss your interaction with us swampcritters. Oh sure, Amy’s a chatterbox that is always trying to engage us, but it just isn’t the same. We’re going to miss your far left socialist perspective and your inate ability to turn the trolls into the frothing, sputtering spectacles that we’ve come to love and enjoy. I’ve enjoyed your mentioning in passing something or other about that healthcare stuff (what was that all about anyway?), but I’m really to going to miss your “1000 Words”. I’ve had more fun with those than I can express in words. Please come back and comment as a critter. I’m also going to wish you luck on behalf of pirate wench. I miss her too. Unless she was really a beer bellied truck driver that wore wife beaters and smoked cigars. I’d walk the plank for you both. Maybe not. I really would.

    Good luck and good fortune.

  • bokeh9

    There’s inflated ego in my doing so, but I want to just say thank you, Karen. I’ve been a Time subscriber for a few decades and a Swampland lurker since pretty much the beginning, and in both I have consistently sought out your byline. THANK YOU.

  • deconstructiva

    …and KT, I know Jay and friends here will keep the swamp and your legacy intact just fine (Adam, please keep “1000 words” going),but still, the swamp without YOU will be like the Black Eyed Peas without Fergie. Will comparing you to Fergie keep us from getting misty-eyed?
    .

    .
    Please stay in touch, KT, and thanks for the memories!

  • nerdyengineer

    KT – I don’t post often, but I’ve enjoyed reading you here for quite some time. You have often been my favorite blogger on this site. Best of luck to you at WaPo.

  • grape_crush

    Karen, you’re one of the few pros (meaning not just professional, but better-at-what-you-do-than-most-professional-journalists) that has shown you get, grok, understand this whole interactive weblog thing…It’s not just about the information you share; it’s also to a certain extent about the person doing the sharing…

    Thank you for your good reporting, your interaction with your readers, and thank you for the glimpses you’ve given us of your work and life. It’s not gonna be quite the same around here.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Best of Luck Ms. Tumulty.

    I wish you had done more regarding providing information to the public on one of the fastest growing areas of criminality against women and children; Technology enabled crimes committed by criminals by people like Akbar Shabazz and Eve Sharon Moore of http://www.akbarshabazz.com.
    These network security criminals and their cohorts continue their acts in large part because of the massive and continued ignorance of the public, and the ignorance and apathy of some in the media.

    In your new position with its additional responsibilities and increased exposure, I hope that you will, at least some day soon, examine this new era of technology enabled violence and viciousness against women and children. It is growing exponentially daily.

    If stalking, abuse, pedophilia, identity creation and theft and all manner of crimes, the underbelly of explosion of technology is not made a key issue, then technology crimes will continue to out pace the law and innocents will continue to be violated by felons like Eve Sharon Moore and her cohorts.

    If tampering with Federal mail is a felony, should breaking into email not be a felony as well?
    Breaking into and reading emails is very easy to do and is used by stalkers, fraudsters etc.
    I provide this as an example of the dearth of laws regarding this new frontier of crimes which remain un-legislated and largely unpunished.

    My organization and others like mine continue to try to raise awareness about these criminals but increased awareness can be achieved by in depth and thorough reporting on the matter by someone who understands the law and also can investigate and expose these new criminals and their crimes.

    Through out American history there have been journalists who stood up for the truth.

    I wish you well.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/04/01/serial-killers-serial-offenders-use-technology-to-violate-the-unwitting-ignorant-public/

  • showtime45

    Karen, thanks for all you’ve done over the years to keep us all informed, and for being willing and able to call a spade a spade. We’ll miss you, but we also know where to find you (in a non-creepy stalker senses). I have a feeling the Post’s traffic (both dead tree and web) will see a spike with your addition.

    Best of luck.

  • lupercal5

    i almost didn’t wanna answer to this one. im just so upset. but i wish u the best Karen :) u have been a star journalist here. if only half the journalists on the press corps had ur dedication (not ambition), ur thoughtfulness (responding to feedback), humanity (putting a face on those stories), and moral compass (not just splitting the difference, but actually calling out lies from both dems n repubs), well we still would have most people crying foul from the media, but how much of a better place this world would be, huh? i hope they don’t muzzle u at the post and you continue that copious amount of output that you’ve delighted us with here on swampland. I can’t wait to bookmark u on the post and read u as often as u add to the national conversation.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    Thanks KT, best of luck.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    All the best in your new endeavor KT.

    Take care.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Always a pleasure, KT. You will be missed.

  • formerlyjames

    What an eloquent message to Time as you move to another great news institution.
    ..
    You greeted me personally on one of my first comments here, asking if I was James L.A. (who hasn’t been around in awhile), with whom you verbally tussled occasionally. I was taken aback, flattered, and have remained your fan ever since.
    ..
    I commented to Klein that his tribute to you sounded like a eulogy, as it must seem at Time. Their loss is the Post’s gain and I will always look for your byline where ever it is. Hope you are happy there, and don’t be a stranger on the Swamp.

  • carotexas1

    Karen I posted this on Joe’s post and want to post here. My only excuse is I was multitasking at the time.

    Karen, I looked forward to your posts at Swampland daily and will really miss them. Thank you for your patience in answering a lot of my questions during the health debate. I learned a lot from you about the way congress really works.

  • stuartzechman

    KT:
    .
    I know that you will understand how much this means when I say that you have been the best political blogger TIME has had. You are the standard here at Swampland.
    .
    Also, you are one of the smartest journalists I’ve run across in this profession of yours; I look forward with great anticipation to joining your next online endeavor in commentary.
    .
    Yours in gratitude,
    .
    Stuart Zechman

  • http://publius2000.wordpress.com publius2000

    I can’t add anything more than has already been told, but you will be dearly missed. I enjoyed your inside-the-beltway insights, esp. regarding the healthcare debates. When everyone was losing their heads, you never lost sight of what was really at stake. So, thank you for your time here, and I hope to read more from you at WaPo. (Thank God and Al Gore for the Internets!)

  • Art Pepper

    Everyone else has already said it better than I could. Best of luck at WaPo. You’ve been one of the shining lights at Swampland, and one of the reasons I stuck around after the Sturm and Drang of the ’08 election had subsided.

  • pbmama

    Ms. Tumulty:

    It is because of you that I discovered Swampland to begin with, and it is always your posts I seek out each day. My family has subscribed to the dead-tree Time for several years, and I always look forward reading your articles.

    I am struck by how deeply saddened I am that you won’t be writing for Time or Swampland anymore.

    Best of luck to you. I hope the WaPo knows how lucky they are!

    Please come back and visit from time to time.

    ~Amy

  • shepherdwong

    A very great loss for Time and all your readers here. As Stuart said, you set the standard. Good luck, Karen.

  • kevin

    Keep up the good work, Karen. We’ll find your writing at your new home.

  • sue_n

    Karen, I rarely comment here but read faithfully, and you’re a big part of the reason why. Your professionalism as a journalist is fully equalled by your humanity, which shows through every story you write.

    I particularly grew to admire and be grateful to/for you during the hcr madness. As a progressive in the beyond-Red State wilds of East Texas, your reporting (along with Stuart’s invaluable links) has more than once allowed me to correct the incredible, um, “misinformation” (to be polite) that thrives in my Fox-fed corner of the world.

    And as a fellow Texan, I also have to thank you for proving that, really, not all of us are stone stupid.

    Good luck at the WaPo, and know you will be truly missed here.

    Hook ‘Em!!

  • apr2563

    Karen: Thank you for putting up with us and always being genrous with your time and responses. I hope you will be added to WaPo’s Q&A weekly rotation. I really enjoy the opportunity one has there to ask questions and get an answer.
    .
    The WaPO has gained a masterful reporter. Hopefully Hiatt will let you be all you can be. Please look in on us at Swampland sometimes. Your reporting on HIR was so helpful.
    .
    Best wishes Karen to you, your immediate family, and your brother.
    Sincerely, Apr2563

  • sacredh

    Black Friday. This is April something or other and I’ll never forget this date. The first thread here in the swamp I ever commented on was one of yours. Now you’re leaving. Was it something ilikechips said?

  • senjam

    Walk good KT.

  • adclym

    Karen, We’ll look forward to reading you regularly in the Post.
    Textee: Here is one example fom few days before the 1994 election in the New York Times:
    WASHINGTON, Nov. 6— Republicans are poised to win more seats in the House of Representatives than they have held since Dwight D. Eisenhower was President. Indeed, after a strong campaign they could end 40 years of Democratic control in the House, history’s longest period of one-party dominance there.

  • adclym

    Re Textee:
    Here is one example fom few days before the 1994 election in the New York Times:
    WASHINGTON, Nov. 6— Republicans are poised to win more seats in the House of Representatives than they have held since Dwight D. Eisenhower was President. Indeed, after a strong campaign they could end 40 years of Democratic control in the House, history’s longest period of one-party dominance there.

  • superterrificdelegate

    Karen:

    Can’t say how much I will miss your regular input in Time and on Swampland, but thanks for giving me a reason to read the Post again. You are truly in a class by yourself and I’ve pulled out my old moniker in your honor.

    Best of luck,

    SuperT

  • Rorschach

    Take care, and thanks

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Congratulations, thank you, and good luck.
    -
    Don’t know what else to say. It’s been a privilege to read your work.

  • momkat778

    KT: you are the best and most interactive writer on Swampland. Thanks for that. Hope you will be blogging at WP. You have a lot of loyal fans here.

    Kay Smith
    Minnesota, yah

  • FlownOver

    KT:

    I’ve gained more from your posts than from the efforts of the rest of the “professional” press combined. I’m glad you were there through HCR, and Swampland will suffer in coverage of future controversies.

    I has a sad.

  • viciousmaniac

    KT:

    Best of luck at WaPo; from someone who had read TIME regularly since Clinton’s first election at 16 years old, I can truly say yours was something exemplary. I must also concur with you regarding that hypnotic red border.

    -Michael

  • iggydwonderllama

    Karen Tumulty, you are not one of the best journalists working today. You are the single best journalist.

  • rose83

    Thank you for all your hard work at Time, especially on Swampland, and best wishes for the future. I hope you know how much we appreciate your patience, knowledge, insights and, above all, your enthusiasm for politics. Like Kathy and IvyB, I have developed a habit of looking to see what your take is on the issues of the day.

    This feels like the end of something, and I can only hope you start something new online soon.

  • http://twitter.com/ktumulty Karen Tumulty

    Note to all:

    Thanks. My heart feels very full.

  • stuartzechman

    Thank you so much for responding to commentary, KT.
    .
    It is –and always has been– greatly appreciated by all.

  • sacredh

    You’re a credit to your profession KT. We need more like you.

  • Cliff

    noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  • anon76

    Cliff pretty well sums up my sentiments.
    I had that thought you were easily the best political reporter in my experience since even before you gave me above the jump kudos approximately two political eons ago. The intervening time has only served to solidify that conviction. Like many here have already stated, I hope that I’ll be able to continue seeing you online in some format other than twitter at your new digs. Swampland’s loss is certainly WaPo’s great gain, but in any event I hope that you continue your mutually-beneficial interaction with your readers in all of your future endeavors- I can’t tell you how much it is appreciated!
    .
    And, on a personal note, as a closeted Spurs fan, thanks for helping me come to terms with the fact that I’m OK with (parts of) Texas.

  • kathy

    Hi bitter!

  • deconstructiva

    KT, you’ve raised the bar for all journalists, kudos and props to you.

  • kathy

    rose: I’ve missed hearing from you. Glad to know you still check in and read, but I always gained so much from your comments.

    It’s been good to hear from quite a few folks who have been absent from comments – at least on the threads I’ve read. Hope you all are well.

  • umeshgeeta

    Love KT and many, many thanks for the good reporting you do. Of course will follow you at WaPo as and when you start publishing. WaPo is needless to say a great joint kicking a*** of lot folks while transitioning whole hog in Blogging world.

    Best wishes.

  • swissArmyBrainBETA

    been reading your stuff for 6 months now and I wish I had known about you before. You’re the best of the swamp because everything you write leaves the impression of a Serious and Diligent journalist. I’m hoping all this move means is that I have to change my RSS to your wapo feed and that you make more money!

  • shibha

    Hey, thanks for all you did here.

    Good luck for your new adventure , I am sure you’ll shine wherever you go. It’s just that I will miss your sun-shine, earnest personality here. I’ll have to explore the wapo just for reading you.

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    WTF…? I take a break, and come back – like a crack addict to his pipe – and KT’s gone…? Someone – I could see sacred volunteering – might as well kick me in the nads.
    .
    I guess it’s customary to wish someone the best when they move on, but it’s not really heartfelt, in this case. Yeah, I’m being selfish, but, dammit, KT was good! And I’m going to miss her. sniff…

blog comments powered by Disqus