Al Frumin’s Bad Day

In the middle of a meeting in the early evening Wednesday on – what else? – reconciliation, the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Terrance Gainer interrupted proceedings to speak with the Senate Parliamentarian. Though neither man would discuss what was going on, reports soon emerged: Tea Party protesters were planning to picket the Parliamentarian’s home. It has not been an easy week for Al Frumin, who instead of going home to be with his family spent all night in the Senate ruling on Republican challenges to the Democratic health care reform reconciliation amendments.

The reconciliation process has launched the non-partisan civil servant into the public eye. Republicans have questioned his integrity (a bit ironically since the man was appointed by Trent Lott) and this morning he’s not exactly popular with Dems. Frumin ruled during the all-night vote-o-rama session that two small GOP challenges to the bill were valid. Sixteen lines of text pertaining to the student lending provisions were struck from the measure, forcing Dems to send the bill back to the House for final passage. Identical legislation must pass both chambers before it can be signed into law by the President.

The Senate is expected to wrap up reconciliation by 2pm today, sending the bill back to the House. The lower chamber invoked a rare one-day rule in order to consider the amendments asap and pass them out tonight before they leave town for the two-week Easter recess. When Obama signs the amendments into law it’ll bring an end to final chapter of the Democrats’ year-long saga to enact health care reform. It’ll also give poor Mr. Frumin a chance to go home, get some sleep and return to a life of blessed anonymity.

Senate Democrats had hoped to avoid a final lob across the Capitol by just passing a clean bill. For more than two weeks a core group of staffers from leadership, the Budget Committee and the Finance Committee have been meeting to review language that would pass the Byrd Rule sniff test – a standard that requires that all provisions be germane to the underlying budget. The Dem strategy was to hold their caucus unified against any GOP amendments – forcing Democratic senators to vote against some fairly tough stuff like prohibiting sales of Viagra to sex offenders – while carefully constructing the legislative language to avoid another House vote. They succeeded in the former but failed in the latter. Thanks to a Democratic senior aide involved in the talks here a list of some of the casualties along the way – provisions that were cut as non-germane during the crafting of the bill:

1.      Rate Review Authority – This proposal prevented the insurance industry from making unwarranted and unreasonable increases to health insurance rates.

2.      Waste, Fraud, and Abuse – Although the reconciliation bill contains significant measures aimed at reducing waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, the original draft of the bill contained several more.  For instance, one provision enabled the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to prevent fraudulent activity by providers who had previously committed tax fraud.

3.      Prescription Drug Prices – The original draft of the reconciliation bill created a new drug discount program for inpatient drugs for certain entities like community health centers and other federal grantees.

4.      Medical Malpractice – The original reconciliation bill appropriated $50 million for medical malpractice reform efforts by States.

5.      Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) – IPAB was established in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to make recommendations on reducing Medicare payments by determining the most efficient and effective ways of providing high quality health care.  The reconciliation bill contained provisions to enhance and modify IPAB, increasing its ability to save the government money.

6.      Prevention Coverage – The original draft of the reconciliation bill would have required existing group plans to cover preventive services starting 2018.

7.      Striking Tobacco Rating – The original draft of the reconciliation bill disallowed health insurers from assessing higher premium rates for tobacco users.

8.      Education – The education provisions in the original reconciliation bill were significantly revised, with several programs being scaled back or removed.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: al frumin, health care reform, House, passage, reconciliation, Senate, senate parliamentarian, tea party protest, votes, Congress, Democratic Party, Education, Health Care, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • lcky9

    I do beleive that #7 should also extend to those who drink to much or for that matter at all.. those are the dangerous people who will get in their cars, drive and kill, maim and injure others..

    However, that’s fine maybe they can INCLUDE that when Pelosi gets to tweak the bill.. LOL..

    I use to listen to Franklin on the radio when “AIR AMERICA” was on.. he most diffidently is NOT the sharpest tool in the shed.. What did he really think this was a 9-5 job? to bad for him..

    Actually knowing that if it’s NOT excluded in a bill it is automatically included.. I find it funny that many of the objections the Republicans submitted were rejected many made perfect logical sense.. OH that must be the reason..

    Well lets see SS is OFFICIALLY in the red and we just passed a bill that will increase taxes on the working class (if you believe it will only be on the rich you have a IQ of about 50).. increase medicare deductions but cut medicare, while trying to buy votes by giving our seniors $250.. Thank God the seniors are smarter than the government.. Which is why they are still alive having been brought up in a time where apparently they did everything unhealthy and have LESS health problems than the younger people do now..

  • Paul-no not that one

    “Tea Party protesters were planning to picket the Parliamentarian’s home”
    .
    Up yet another notch.
    .
    Combined with the NRCC being a-okay with vandalism it’s not hard to see where this will end up.
    .
    http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/nrcc-on-perriello-incidents-hes-not-the-victim.php?ref=fpblg

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Jay. Are the R’s still trying to shut down everything at 2pm? What’s the D’s best counter strategy? I’d guess it’s keeping everyone around indefinitely until everything on the plate is finished. As for Tea Party agitators, are Senators getting police protection as House members are? I posted this at Adam’s morning piece and is worth linking again: Sarah Palin’s adding to the mess – it has excellent TV clips on TP violence.
    http://palingates.blogspot.com/2010/03/sarah-palin-reload.html
    I hope YOU get decent sleep this weekend, Jay, along with KT, Katie, and Amy for your excellent HCR work, putting up with TP insanity, etc.

  • newfreedomblog

    Ms Newton-Small, when should we expect the disclaimer after every single one of your posts that reads….
    .

    “Ms Jay Newton-Small IS a liberal, she will unashamedly exclude from any of her reporting positive comments about, and put down anything that is about Republicans, Conservativism, or the Tea Party Movement, please excuse her complete bias”

  • repzak

    You fail at reading. The original bill – as propsoed by Democrats – would have *prevented* higher rates for tobacco smokers. The exact same thing you try with your sarcasm to argue FOR. So nice to see you are in agreement with the Democrats about something :p

  • deconstructiva

    …rusty, are you secretly in love with Jay (and Karen)? (Still trying to write that apology? but I digress) Jay was fair covering that TP convention and could’ve easily and intentionally made them look shrill and foolish – MS might’ve used snark. She didn’t. If any TP’s (then or now) ever got in her face and literally screamed or called her names she had every right to out them here w/ names, pix, etc. She hasn’t. These prove your claims wrong. I again applaud your ability to be the most consistent commenter (at being wrong, that is).

  • slowp

    WooHoo!!! This is great for Republicans!! They get to force the Dems to spend another hour of free TV time voting to successfully pass another piece of legislation along with cheering and high-fiving themsleves.

    And then that nasty socialist Obama is going to have to hold another celebratory signing ceremony on live TV, reminding the electorate once again what a great president he is.

    Go, Party of No!!!!

  • arbitrarystring

    Al Frumin != Al Franken, which is who I assume you were referring to with your odd “Franklin” conflation.

    Also, I’m still waiting for the Democrats to introduce legislation to remove Shift and Caps Lock keys from all keyboards, thus rendering conservatives unable to post on comment threads.

  • Ivy_B

    I use to listen to Franklin on the radio when “AIR AMERICA” was on.. he most diffidently is NOT the sharpest tool in the shed.. What did he really think this was a 9-5 job? to bad for him.

    .

    Another reading comprehension fail – you are so eager to slam Democrats, you confused Senator Al Franken (who was on Air America) with Mr. Frumin who is the Senate Parliamentarian, a non-partisan, non-elected position who was appointed to the position by a Republican, Trent Lott.

  • aussifaire

    DEMS HIDING PLANNED KAVORKIAN STYLE DEATH PANELS FOR USA PUBLIC & VETS & TURNING USA INTO DICTATORSHIP & MORE…..

    SUCH AS THE DEMS WANTING TO FORCE USA PUBLIC TAX PAYERS TO PAY TAXES FOR EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN ANYBODY WHOM WANTS TO COME HERE FOR THE GRAND PRIZE PAYOFF OF LIVING TAX FREE AT PUBLIC EXPENSE…..

    UNLESS THE PUBLIC FORCES DEMS TO REPEAL EVERY ITEM OF THIS HEALTHCARE BILL THIS IS WHAT AWAITS PUBLIC….

    DEMS & ACLU always thinking USA is too stupid to notice so they RE-NAME EVERYTHING but the effect is still the same.

    Only DEMS call them COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH COMMITTEES ….whom implement the COST/LIFE VALUE calculations (ie meaning the whole USELESS TO SOCIETY ‘THANG’) and ULTIMATELY decide who is DENIED MEDS & HEALTHCARE…..just like ENGLAND & CANADA.

    THE RESULTS??? The KEVORKIAN clause allows GOV to use DOCTORS to CONVINCE people to allow themselves to be killed thru “taking one for the team” and be left to die rather than BURDEN THE HEALTH PLAN—especially since the DEMS WANT TO PARTY HEARTY ON THE MORE EXPENSIVE FUNDS FOR PORK it’s always about greed for the DEMS.

    obama’s whole scheme is based on COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS, which INEVITABLY installs DEATH PANELS whom will control costs by DENYING HEALTHCARE TO ELDERLY & VETS.

    As it turns out t the Congressional Budget Office won’t even be able to provide a full cost estimate to any of the committee before it votes. In an attempt to rush thru ANY BILL BEFORE THE PUBLIC GETS TOO WISE.

    When it’s all said and done the RUSH to pass ANYTHING THRU is meant to preclude both THE PUBLIC & CONGRESS from being too careful or prudent, always RUSHING the PUBLIC INTO BAD DECISIONS which would be catastrophic for public because DEMS figure PUBLIC will be the one’s whom have to deal with the COSTS & CONSEQUENCES of being stuck home with a screaming child/vet/loved one stranded without meds & healthcare——later.

    Now–they want a 5 person INDEPENDENT MEDICARE ADVISORY COUNCIL (imac) is the LATEST attempt by DEMS TO bamboozle the PUBLIC. what worries experts is IMAC (called INDEPENDENT MEDICARE COMMISSION by the SENATE would be EMPOWERED to SET MEDICARE RATES & make cuts to the program IN A WAY that is COMPLETELY OUTSIDE OF THE USA LEGILSATIVE PROCESS. one MORE TIME ATTEMPTING TO SET USA GOV UP AS ILLEGAL MONOPOLY ENGAGING IN UNCONSTITUTIONAL BEHAVIOR towards the PUBLIC.

    The PLAN cirulated by the SENATE FINANCE COMMITTE CHAIRMAN MAX BAUCUS & PELOSI , SAYS CONGRESS would only BE ALLOWED TO OVERRIDE IMAC’S plans IF they can submit an alternative plan that would save an equivalent amount of budgetary saving OTHERWISE THE CONGRESS CANNOT VETO IT —HENCE INTERFERING WITH THE SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.

    SINCE the GOV WOULD BE AN ILLEGAL MONOPOLY setting rates they could manipulate to claim ANYTHING isn’t suitable.

    in our CURRENT system we have MEDPAC that makes recommendations to CONGRESS which MEDPAC is routinely ignore because MEDICARE IS POPULAR WITH SENIORS . HOWEVER, IMAC would NOT HAVE to get DIRECT CONSENT from CONGRESS in order to implement cuts making THIS TOO, OUTSIDE the APPROPRIATE SYSTEM of CHECKS & BALANCES.

    THIS gives WASH DC SLUGS more power & freer hand to make IN APPROPRIATE CHANGES THAT they SHOULD NOT have towards an UNSUSPECTING PUBLIC.

    This should make the USA PUBLIC more than a LITTLE concerned because in SETTING UP new FEDERAL PANELS & AGENCIES (that constitutionally have no right to be set up) in CHARGE of cutting costs, benefits YOU CAN BET USA PUBLIC CHOICE AND COVERAGE will suffer.

    DON’T UNDERSTAND WHAAAT comparative effectiveness is all about??—In Canada if you are OVERWEIGHT you are DEEMED as USELESS TO SOCIETY (that’s comparative effectiveness means) so if you NEED an OPERATION—GUESS WHAAAT you DON’T GET ONE EVER. WHETHER overweight or not most CANADIANS have to come to USA (on arrangement) to get operations.

    A simple knee operation -out of pocket is 16,000.00
    Any other type operation out of pocket STARTS — 30,000,00 OR MORE.

    WAIT TIMES for a scan minimum 22 months
    WAIT TIME for operations 3-10 years or more most DIE while waiting OR pay out of pocket and COME TO USA for healthcare.

    SOC HEALTHCARE which has been re-named CO-OP AND PUBLIC OPTION will turn our healthcare into just like CANADA’s complete with all the EXCESSIVE HIGH COSTS AND FAILURES and these accounts haven’t been from immigrants:

    1. Just LIKE Canada it IS ROUTINE for PREGNANT WOMEN to not find beds to have children in.
    2. Just LIKE Canada people will have to re-use BLOODY/SOILED SHEETS AFTER someone else has been there.
    3. Just LIKE Canada people will be left to die in their own excrement because they are simply IGNORED. AND this isn’t even the WORSE CASE SCENARIO’S.

    4. CANADA AT PRESENT has an AGREEMENT with USA that CANADA’S PATIENTS come TO USA TO GET healthcare because CANADIANS CANNOT get taken care of waiting periods can/are more than a few years for most things.
    5. if a CANADIAN wants to get an operation and they are OVERWEIGHT they are deemed USELESS TO SOCIETY and WILL DENIED the operations or anything else they need.
    6. If a CANADIAN is over a certain age and needs something like a knee operation or any operation —-it’s denied.

    BUT WHAT they DON’T TELL you is if the PUBLIC IS STUPID ENOUGH TO BUY INTO SOC HEALTHCARE …. there are 2 pages DEVOTED to giving DEMS A BLANK CHECK TO MAKING RULES UP as they go along incidentally it’s what is ‘with’ the rush because it helps people OVERLOOK what balogna DEMS are trying to unload on the unsuspecting public.

    THE RESULTS– FORCED EUTHANASIA AND MANDATORY GOV ASSISTED SUICIDE by DENIED MEDICINE & DENIED HEALTHCARE.

    However DEMS forgot to mention public option and co-ops amount to DENIED LIFE-RESTORING MEDS & HEALTHCARE FOR ALL RACES ….since DEMS & ACLU think USA are simply too stupid to notice??

    IT was US JUSTICE FOUNDATION whom kicked out hillarycare AND with public help can do the same for CO-OP PUBLIC OPTION WHICH ARE SOC HEALTHCARE.

    MANY of the concerns include powers given to a health care commissioner & secretary of health & human services to make decisions about what kinds of services & prescription drugs will be covered under government-subsidized plans.

    seek legislative and LEGAL action to get SOC HEALTHCARE & stimulus and bailout kicked out see AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE OR GOOGLE the problems with socialized health care OR GOOGLE handsoffmyhealth.org OR GOOGLE bigGovhealth.org OR stoptheaclu.com OR health science institute OR familysecuritymatters.org OR Alliance Defense

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Rusty,
    Given my total ass kicking by the commentators this past summer over my Sarah Palin cover, I’ll take your remarks with a grain of humor. Not to mention my Bending the Rules post or the story everyone hated on Lindsey Graham or my coverage of the Tea Party convention. I’m a conservative when it suits you and a liberal when it suits you (and by you I mean the commentators in general). Which tells me I’m doing my job right.
    JNS

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Thanks for the defense.
    To answer some of your questions. Im writing a story about whether the Senate will be in over the weekend on unemployment benefits, so look for that in the morning. They seem to still be objecting to hearings as committees have taken to meeting on the floor to hold votes and do committee business. You can see them clustered around the cloak room or in groups around desks. The Capitol Police are working with local authorities for when the members go home to protect them and their families.
    JNS

  • nflfoghorn

    Please, Webmaster, do us all a favor and DELETE THIS CLOWN.

  • nflfoghorn

    Even if I agreed with a thing AussFaire says, we ain’t got all day to read it!!!

  • carotexas1

    Jay, you need to add the Cantor story which I thought was too gushy. But you did redeem your self with your stories from Haiti which were wonderful. I am looking forward to your reports when you go to the war zone.
    .
    Thank you for this post with the amendments they had to drop. I was surprised to not see amendments with restrictions for Insurance Companies in the reconciliation.

blog comments powered by Disqus