Morning Must Reads: The Big Deal

Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy)

Official White House Photo by Chuck Kennedy

–That’s what a signature with 22 pens looks like. Here’s who get them.

–Probably the most touted immediate effect of the health care bill, a measure preventing insurance companies from denying children coverage on the basis of preexisting conditions, may not kick in as advertised until 2014. The AP reports that while minors who already have coverage now can’t be dropped if they get sick, uninsured children can still be denied new coverage based on previous conditions. The White House is looking to address any ambiguity in the language of the bill quickly.

–David Leonhardt writes this in today’s New York Times: “Beyond the health reform’s effect on the medical system, it is the centerpiece of his deliberate effort to end what historians have called the age of Reagan.” I totally agree.

Patrick Ruffini writes Republicans could have preempted the Democrats’ health care push by more seriously addressing the endemic problems of the the system during the Bush administration.

–John Dorschner of the Miami Herald points out the individual mandate, central to conservative objections and legal challenges, has long been considered a Republican idea.

–Speaking of the mandate, I find it somewhat puzzling that Mitt Romney is eagerly flying the repeal flag. Many have pointed out the similarities between RomneyCare and ObamaCare, and it will certainly play into the 2012 GOP presidential primary. While I don’t think it’s necessarily as devastating an issue to Romney as some suggest — like his faith or his previous position on abortion, it’s not an insurmountable hurdle in a potentially weak field — I don’t see how highlighting the issue does him any favors. He has had no trouble flying under the radar on conservative causes celebres in the past.

–Despite assertions that health care “poisoned the well,” Republicans are taking a hard look at the political implications of opposing upcoming financial regulatory and education legislation.

–Tensions between the U.S. and Israel continued as President Obama and PM Netanyahu met at the White House last night. The announcement of more new construction in East Jerusalem came at the worst possible time, and Bibi’s visit lacked all the trappings of a normal meeting between heads of state. Glenn Kessler parses.

–Not surprisingly, conservative third-party candidates in November would cut into the Republican vote.

–With Justices Stevens and Ginsburg speculated to be nearing retirement, USA Today looks at Judge Diane Wood.

–And capitalism responds to Biden’s candidness.

What did I miss?

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Education, Health Care, Mideast, Miscellany, Republican Party, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Image: Mark Halperin interviews Mitt Romney

    Romney Defends Bain Record, Hits Obama on Economy: ‘He Just Doesn’t Have a Clue’

    Mitt Romney lashed President Obama’s economic stewardship in an interview with TIME’s Mark Halperin on Wednesday, deflecting attacks on his years as a private equity executive and laying out how he hopes to take control of the economy as soon as he’s sworn in, should he defeat Obama in November.

    Lewis Eisenberg, Major Romney Donor, Accuses Obama Of Demonizing Wall StreetHuffPost Politics

    Image: Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

    Mother of Mitt: How Lenore Romney’s Failed Campaign Shaped the Presumptive Republican Nominee

    This week’s TIME cover story, “The Mother of the Mitt Campaign,” tells the tale of how Lenore Romney’s 1970 run for U.S. Senate may have made a bigger impression on the Republican presidential candidate than his years spent as the son of a governor. Mitt’s father lost his own presidential bid, but it was the lessons from his mother’s loss that are more instructive as Romney enters the campaign stretch.

  • queencersei

    “Republicans could have preempted the Democrats’ health care push by more seriously addressing the endemic problems of the the system during the Bush administration.”

    Sure they could have. But didn’t. Health Care hasn’t been an issue for the GOP since Nixon.

  • newfreedomblog

    White House spokesman Reid Cherlin said the pens went to:
    .
    1. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
    2. Sen. Dick Durbin
    3. Sen. Max Baucus
    4. Sen. Tom Harkin
    5. Sen. Chris Dodd
    6. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
    7. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer
    8. Rep. James Clyburn
    9. Rep. George Miller
    10. Rep. Henry Waxman
    11. Rep. Sandy Levin
    12. Rep. John Dingell
    13. Rep. Charles Rangel
    14. Vice President Biden
    15. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
    16. Vicki Kennedy
    17. Nancy-Ann DeParle, director of the White House Office of Health Reform
    18. Phil Schiliro, assistant to the president for legislative affairs
    19. Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association
    20. President Obama
    .
    And two were kept for the archives.

    .
    Yes this is a pretty accurate list of those who have screwed the American people alright. Good job Adam.

  • nflfoghorn

    Calling you a sore loser WOULD be a term of endearment :)

  • nflfoghorn

    Wasn’t Ritt Momney for statewide health care before he was against universal health care?

  • nflfoghorn

    Anybody heard from LIEberman lately? Is he the cat that ate the canary here?

  • 3xfire3

    Adam,

    You’re letting your Bias show.

    “While I don’t think it’s necessarily as devastating an issue to Romney as some suggest — like his faith or his previous position on abortion, it’s not an insurmountable hurdle in a potentially weak field”.

    Adam on what facts are you basing you statement about a potentially weak field?
    I know that liberals think anyone is weak next to their God Obama. With his average approval rating having dropping below 50% you can’t make a legitimate argument that Republicans have potentially weak opponents. That’s a comment only a person with a liberal bias would make.
    Try being a little more balanced in your reporting.

    Please no comments about a bump in the approval ratings. Those bumps are usually temporary in nature and do not represent long term trends.

  • freeinpa

    Romney has seen the error of the bill in MA. That is a trait you will never see in liberals.
    =

    When it becomes a budget disaster the fix will be (Come say it with me) TAX THE RICH!

  • nflfoghorn

    Heck, we’re still using DATE STAMPS in the 21st Century???

  • m0mentom0ri

    “When it becomes a budget disaster the fix will be (Come say it with me) TAX THE RICH!”

    Poor, rich people. We’ve really hammered the top 1% in this country. They’re barely getting along these days.

    Oh wait, no we haven’t:

    http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/saez07.png

  • nflfoghorn

    Freep Daffynishions:
    .
    Politician changing his mind…
    .
    “sees the error of his ways” = RepublicSpeak
    “flip-flop” = Democrat

  • nflfoghorn

    3×3, you gotta win the nomination first. BTW God must still be writing his book in Crawford, right?

  • queencersei

    Romney isn’t going to be President. He has flipped on too many issues and the religious right won’t support him in the end because of his Mormon beliefs. So, so sick of hearing about Mitt!

  • m0mentom0ri

    Actually, Obama’s back above the 50% mark (just barely):
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx
    .
    I wouldn’t want someone to accuse you of making a comment that only a person with a dishonest bias would make.

  • kevin

    Romney in 2006, bragging about his Obama-clone health care plan:
    .

    Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate. But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on government is not libertarian.

    .
    http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008213
    .
    He’s toast.

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    I’m not 100% thrilled with the bill but the wingnut meltdown has been 1000x more entertaining than I ever imagined. Can they bring up immigration reform next to keep the freak-out going?

  • http://flounder73.wordpress.com pafro

    I bet the weak fielders are already honing their ads about another “reverse-Romney”. Add this to the myriad of other Reverse Romneys and the guy is done.

  • homerhk

    i’m sorry to all the repubs on this thread. Obama has pwned your party well and good with this law. He’s shown the country what a bunch of babies, sore losers, morally bankrupt, power-hungry madmen the republicans are. He’s kneecapped probably the leading contender for the 2012 election by modifying and improving a bill he previously signed into law and daring him to oppose it.
    In the past year, he’s consigned his former presidential opponent to the rubbish bin, his former vp opponent to reality tv, his political opponents to vein-throbbing obscurity. And, oh yes, he’s gotten passed two of the biggest transfers of wealth to the poor and middle class (stimulus, healthcare reform) in the process. If that was all that he’s done in the past year and a bit that would be tremendous but he’s also appointed the first latina supreme court judge, taken the middlemen out of the student loan business, massively increased funding for green energy, passes schip, passed the lily leadbetter act, quietly taken out more al-queda than his predecessor, continued to withdraw troops from iraq.

    I mean that’s not even an exhaustive list. (I forgot to say that he saved the country from depression). And yes, I know he didn’t do all of this personally and there’s credit to go around. But, I mean, good luck in running against all that in 2012 when all the potential candidates will have to say that they’re against all of what has been achieved….

    There’s a lot of talk about 11 dimensional chess with Obama, most of it overinflated nonsense but the man does have a pretty spot on political brain, no doubt about it.

  • square1

    Agreed. I’m pretty disappointed with the liberal members of Congress who negotiated like tourists in a Moroccan bazaar.

    I do think that, in the long term, the individual mandate will prove pretty unpopular and the subsidies either insufficient to cover rising premiums or a horrendous fiscal burden

    But for now it is a joy to see the wingnuts’ heads explode.

  • FlownOver

    Better yet, Romney couldn’t wait to take the bait. That leaves – what, the Good-Looking Vacant White Guy Ticket, Thune/Brown?

  • nibblybits

    free: If you’re so concerned for the rich, why aren’t you directing your rage at Bush? After all, the Great Recession has sucked more wealth from the top 5% than Dems could ever hope to tax out of them.

    As my rich pal once said to me, “Be glad to pay your taxes. It means you’re making money.” Now that we’ve gone from -6% in GDP to growing 6%, and the DJIA from under 7000 to back to almost 11000 today, rich people are making money again. They should be grateful to pay their taxes.

  • hellslittlestangel

    Yeah, I been gettin my schadenfreude on LAMF. Watching Republicans sputter with impotent rage is a joy.

  • homerhk

    Brown will be like a male Sarah Palin. I don’t know much about Thune except he’s very tall. Still, I can’t see anyone who’s going to be able to take Barack in the debates.

  • hellslittlestangel

    I anxiously await Ann Alcohouse’s analysis of Obama’s handwriting.

  • nflfoghorn

    Agreed, HK. Small nitpick – a judge on the Big Court is referred to as a Justice.

  • allthingsinaname

    Looks a little hesitant? Perhaps he is lying about being a Socialist, Communist, Fascist Pig? I am sure we will think of something.

  • hellslittlestangel

    The O indicates a big ego as well as a part of the female anatomy, and the b riser slashing through it means hide your women…

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    A bit of International flare for you: Ann Colture is on a Canadian tour and her appearance in Ottawa was canceled at the last minute because security couldn’t guarantee her safety from the protesters. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2010/03/23/ottawa-coulter-speech.html

  • 3xfire3

    I thought you would all like to know that Mitt Romney will be appearing in The Villages Florida this Friday night. He will give a short speech and then take questions from the crowd. I am looking forward to attending. I attended one of his meeting two years ago. He is really an impressive person.
    He would make a great President. Lots of management experience. Boy could we use that.

  • aussifaire

    NEW HC TURNS PUBLIC INTO INT’L ILLEGAL FUGITIVES FOR SEEKING MEDS & HEALTHCARE FOR FAMILY VETS & CHILDREN

    UNLESS THE PUBLIC WILL FOR THE DEMS TO REPEAL THIS HEALTHCARE ………..

    DEMS are the one’s whom choose to believe that even though the DEMS ARE DENYING THE VETS & PUBLIC MEDICINE indefinitely —the DEMS & the ACLU can stupidly count on attempting to claim —-they are actually insuring people or giving them healthcare???

    When YOU are stuck home WITH a screaming child without MEDS & healthcare you will think differently..

    Anyone with any reasonable amount of intelligience should know if you AREN’T BEING GIVEN MEDICINE (for new or pre-existing condition) & NOT BEING GIVEN HEALTHCARE —-YOU CANNOT CLAIM YOU ARE INSURED OR RECEIVING HEALTHCARE.

    DEMS & ACLU are counting on the public being to gullible to know this.

    WHAAAAT DO YOU CALL IT WHEN people like MR. RUSH LIMBAUGH or anyone of USA PUBLIC Is FORCED TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY TO GET HEALTHCARE & MEDS—-DOES ANYONE think they can claim MR. LIMBAUGH OR ANYONE OF USA PUBLIC ARE PROPERLY INSURED BY USA GOV OR RECEIVING MEDS FROM USA GOV…..if you DO—then THE DEMS HAVE AN ADDITION TO THE BROOKLY BRIDGE THATS FOR SALE and they’ll throw that into the HEALTHCARE PACKAGE TOO if you will be gullible to believe that too…

    DEMS HAVE TARGETED CHILDREN MOST HARSHLY TO BE LEFT WITHOUT MEDS & HEALTHCARE WHILE THEY BALOGNA THE PUBLIC TO CLAIM OTHERWISE….

    DON’T TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT SEE FOR YOURSELVES …..

    seek legislative and LEGAL action to get SOC HEALTHCARE & stimulus and bailout kicked out see American center for law and justice OR GOOGLE the problems with socialized health care OR GOOGLE handsoffmyhealth.org OR GOOGLE bigGovhealth.org OR stoptheaclu.com OR Health science institute OR familysecuritymatters.org OR ALLIANCE DEFENSE

  • freeinpa

    “We’ve really hammered the top 1% in this country. They’re barely getting along these days.”

    I do love the cavalier attitude the left always has with spending or confiscating someone else’s money. And using Krugman for anything other than gnome lawn ornament is just comical

    ==
    “As my rich pal once said to me, “Be glad to pay your taxes. It means you’re making money.”

    I am not opposed to paying taxes. The problem with liberals is they believe there is no end. If they want more, its only right that other people’s wealth should be confiscated. In the pursuit of “fairness” which roughly translates to entitlements on steroids, if it moves, breathes or exists it will be taxed (Tanning salons comes to mind). Add the federal rates to increased taxes on Medicare, state taxes, real estate taxes, sales taxes and possibly soon higher energy costs and taxes and growth will be zero and government debt will be devastating.

  • nibblybits

    free: I’m still waiting for the day when Republicans or conservatives or whatever you call yourselves are willing to cut the defense budget along with entitlements one for one. When the right get serious about that is when some of us more center-liberal folks will take you seriously.

blog comments powered by Disqus