White House Officially Endorses “F#@king”

During this morning’s East Room event, Vice President Joe Biden turned to President Barack Obama and said into his ear, “This is a big f#%king deal.” The private comment was picked up on a live mic.

Moments later, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs endorsed Biden’s comment, via Twitter.

And yes Mr. Vice President, you’re right…

(And yes, I admit to taking great pleasure in writing the headline of this post.)

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • apollyon07

    Obama’s reply: F@ck yeah it is.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Scherer post on Biden’s perhaps F-bomb in 5.4.3.2. and now.
    Paul-no not th…
    March 23, 2010
    at 1:01 pm
    Reply to this comment
    .
    Atta boy!

  • allthingsinaname

    F@cking A it is

  • palininatowel

    Dick Cheney to Leahy on Senate floor: “Go f*** yourself.”

    Michael Scherer’s reaction:
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    *crickets*

  • nflfoghorn

    Big flaking deal?? Where’s his mom? Oh yeah, sorry.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    well done, palininatowel. You have definitively exposed my bias. :)

  • palininatowel

    Mike, no need to “expose” you. Look at your headline on your bill signing post. You expose yourself every day.

    Well, not like that

  • gysgt213

    Somebody cursed and it wasn’t at another person and its hugh news.

  • pierogielunaire

    The Dude abides, man. The Dude abides.

  • ogliberal

    Damn. In a previous thread I predicted that Scherer wouldn’t post about this because Drudge beat him to it. But it appears that Michael has found his angle. Hooray!

    Great response from Gibbs.

  • Ivy_B

    You would have been closer to the time, but MS had to get his dumb poll story in first.
    .
    But, props to you.

  • stuartzechman

    As you know, you go to vote with the press corps you have.
    .
    They’re not the press corps you might want or wish to have at a later time.

  • spob

    I am with the libs on this–who the f&*^ cares?

  • palininatowel

    Paul you win today’s “Predict-the-Predictable-Michael Scherer-Post-of-the-Day” Award. Your commemorative plaque is in the mail.

  • palininatowel

    I f***ing care, spob.

  • stuartzechman

    Intellectual honesty noted, spob.

  • ohiolib

    well spob, we finally agree.

  • spob

    I see the salty language as a non-issue.
    .
    Guys, you should be happy–this thing sucks up oxygen. MS could be writing about the constitutional illiteracy of John Conyers or Arne Duncan’s shenanigans in Chicago that have just come to light.

  • kbanginmotown

    Heckuva job, Rummy! ;)

  • spob

    Hey, as long as it’s consensual and doesnt involve minors don’t we all?

  • grape_crush

    White House Officially Endorses “F#@king”

    F#@king also has the Grape_Crush Seal of Approval.

    Can’t wait to see how many adults get the vapors over this.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    I clutched my pearls and swooned when I heard that dratted remark and immediately called for tea and crumpets. Ooops… sorry that was what the queen did, not me. :)

    I think this exchange was funny in a crude kind of way. Oh, well. He did not intend to be overheard, I think.

    I am just delighted that Obama got IT done finally. Everything else is ancillary.

    LM
    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/technology-savvy-nigerian-criminals-are-the-greatest-threat-to-national-security/

  • ogliberal

    spob – I don’t know if you’re still reading the thread where you called me and Conyers stupid but I replied to you there. Figured I’d reply here as well…
    ===
    The General Welfare Clause reads:
    ===
    “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.”
    ===
    This clause, along with the Commerce Clause, can provide Congress with a legal justification for including an individual mandate in the healthcare legislation.
    ===
    This guy:
    ===
    http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=2764
    ===
    has a JD from Harvard, a PhD from Cambridge, is a Constitutional law professor at Yale Law School, and he thinks that both the General Welfare Clause and the Commerce Clause could be used to provide legal grounding for the individual mandate.
    ===
    Are John Conyers and I really that stupid, stupid? O, but wait, the founders didn’t explicity say anything about health insurance or an individual mandate so it must be un-Constitutional.

  • oathdoover

    Michael Scherer, you are a F#@king idiot…

  • aussifaire

    IN WAKE OF NEW HEALTHCARE NO ONE WILL INTERVENE FOR PUBLIC IN NEED OF MEDS & HEALTHCARE FOR VETS & FAMILIES & CHILDREN…..

    ACCORDING TO DEMS & NEW HC—ALL PUBLIC ARE NOW CONSIDERED FUGITIVES FROM THE LAW FOR WANTING MEDS & HEALTHCARE….

    REMEMBER RECENTLY PRIOR TO VOTE WHEN THE MOTHER OF A CHILD WHOM HAD CANCER WAS RUTHLESSLY HUNTED DOWN BECAUSE THE PARENT DIDN’T WANT TO EXPOSE THE CHILD TO CHEMO??

    WELL, FORTUNATELY FOR THE MOTHER & CHILD SOMEONE INTERVENED AND THE CHILD IS NOW RECEIVING HELP WITHOUT CHEMO ENDANGERING THE CHILDS LIFE.

    WELL……UNDER NEW HC —–NO ONE WILL INTERVENE FOR YOU THE PUBLIC OR YOUR CHILDREN…

    WHY??? ..BECAUSE …..THE USA PUBLIC WILL BE FORCED TO PAY FOR AND ILLEGAL/UNCONSTITUTIONAL HEALTHCARE BY BEING CRIMINALIZED AND SOUGHT FOR PROSECUTION AFTER BEING DEPRIVED HEALTHCARE IF THE USA PUBLIC & PARENTS SEEKS TO FIND HEALTHCARE FOR THEMSELVES OR THEIR CHILDREN WITHIN OR WITHOUT THE USA BORDERS.

    SO….To the present it’s only one of the 1 % group of people attempting to destroy our Nation’s economic systems.

    WHY??? It was said to a WASH DC VIP—that the reason the Socialists think they will win this time and are doing this is because ACLU and their DEMS SLUGS — they don’t think American’s are ” smart enough” to care to let their fingers do the walking to protect their lands, their CONSTITUTION or their freedoms. The DEMS and ACLU don’t think the 99% of American’s will be ‘smart enough” to CARE about their country, their homes, their small business enough to kick the WASH DC SLUGS out and send them packing by way of Balagovich for NOT doing what is right to protect PUBLIC freedoms and the free enterprise system (ie meaning small business/med business) and rights.

    seek legislative and LEGAL action to REPEAL & SEEK LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE DEMS FOR t SOC HEALTHCARE & stimulus and bailout kicked out see American center for law and justice OR GOOGLE the problems with socialized health care OR GOOGLE handsoffmyhealth.org OR GOOGLE bigGovhealth.org OR stoptheaclu.com OR Health science institute OR familysecuritymatters.org

  • spob

    ogliberal, the mandate itself, not the excise tax, cannot come from the general welfare clause. Get that right. Else Congress could simply mandate anything under the sun and slap an excise tax for failure to do it.
    .
    In any event, Conyers yapped about the “good and welfare” clause, whatever the heck that means.

  • afguy

    Oh, good another troll with a case of acute capslock-itis.
    .
    Is that condition covered by the insurance companies?

  • Paul-no not that one
  • bobcn1

    ‘White House Officially Endorses “F#@king’

    Me too!!

    Maybe the White House has finally found something we can get post-partisan agreement on.

  • http://n/a sledg5

    What’s the big deal? Such language has become endemic in the U.K. from the American programmes we get on our television. Our teenagers use foul language all the time these days.

  • grape_crush

    …as long as it’s consensual and doesnt involve minors…
    .
    As if some Republicans actually let that stand in their way.

  • discostu570

    For the record, to all the people protesting that this isn’t a big deal, I didn’t get the impression from Scherer’s post that he was selling this as a big deal. I should hope he wasn’t, because it obviously isn’t a big deal. People swear all the time. As I’m typing this, I’m swearing up a storm for all the world (within earshot of my window) to hear. If I keep it up long enough, I fully expect to have neighbourhood kids start swearing back at me. It’ll be a fun afternoon for all of us.
    -
    I will get a good laugh out of it if Fox News runs with this tonight. They use arguments against ‘political correctness’ constantly and in the most bizarre ways, then take tremendous umbrage whenever a story breaks that somebody on the other side of the aisle has been swearing. In a slower news cycle this could go on for days, but as is, I think there’s plenty of better stuff for the pundits to be outraged over.

  • palininatowel

    Yeah, because, god knows, no one swore in the UK prior American television shows polluting the airways.

  • pietr96

    Palinatowel:

    You are in great form today. I f***ing love it!

  • shepherdwong

    Considering the legislation they just passed, I hope they also endorse the use of a condom.

  • sacredh

    The White House has endorsed f*cking for quite awhile now. Reagan f*cked every union worker in the country. Clinton f*cked every woman he could (OK, Monica blew him). GWB f*cked our civil rights and the constitution. Nixon f*cked himself. Carter was just plain f*cked. This isn’t even a man bites dog story. Fun though.

  • deconstructiva

    …assfire’s caps lock is malfunctioning. It doesn’t always stick.

  • bobcn1

    :-)

  • http://n/a sledg5

    17.1 Yeah, because, god knows, no one swore in the UK prior American television shows polluting the airways. Quote from Palininatowel.

    Yes we did swear but not as frequently. But in the past we didn’t have foul language brought into our homes or cinemas as we do now from US imported material. One only has to look at the uneducated comments in YouTube to see how degenerate people abuse the media. By the way, we seem to write better English than Palininatowel. That’s an example of another unwanted import to the U.K.

  • crdvis16

    Honestly, who cares?

blog comments powered by Disqus