After Much Delay…

Here’s the 25-page Congressional Budget Office “preliminary estimate” of the Senate bill with the House package of changes. Much, much more here and on Time.com once I’ve had a chance to comb through and absorb all the policy implications. There are no earth-shattering changes. The Senate bill with the reconciliation package would reduce the federal deficit by $138 billion by 2019; the Senate bill itself would reduce the deficit by $118 billion over the same period.

Some people say that comprehensive health care reform is like a balloon – squeeze one part and another part expands. Increase subsidies, which the reconciliation package does, and the cost of the bill goes up. Delay the start of the excise tax, which the bill does, and revenue from the bill goes down. House Democratic leaders worked under severe fiscal constraints in designing their reconciliation package. They had to keep the legislation under $1 trillion over 10 years, make it save more than the Senate bill did, and expand coverage and affordability to satisfy House Democrats. These are not easy rules to follow, especially when the whip count is still volatile and the clock is ticking. But they followed the rules and the package could earn endorsements from some wavering House Democrats today.

Here are a few ways the reconciliation package would alter the Senate bill, based on a plain-language summary of the package leaked to The Hill earlier today:

Relative to the Senate bill, the reconciliation package:

* Increases subsidies to make buying insurance more affordable for middle-income Americans
* Weakens the individual mandate by reducing the penalty people pay if they don’t maintain insurance coverage and phasing the penalty in over time.
* Strengthens employer mandate by increasing penalties that large companies would pay if they didn’t provide coverage or their workers qualified for subsidies
* Closes Medicare Part D prescription drug gap known as the donut hole
* Adds a new tax to unearned income
* Increases payroll taxes for individuals earning $200,000 or more per year
* Increases the massive tax on the drug industry tax, but delays it by 1 year – the industry would have to pay $3.85 billion per year beginning in 2011.
* Increases the massive tax on the health insurance industry tax but delays it by 4 years – the industry would have to pay $11.2 billion per year beginning in 2014.
* Eliminates the much (and deservedly) maligned Cornhusker Kickback.

As I said, more to come. Stay tuned.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • square1

    These are not easy rules to follow

    Particularly when you bend over backwards to exclude a public option from the bill.

  • homerhk

    Square dude, can’t you take some pleasure in the following:
    - 32 million uninsured covered
    - more taxes on phrma
    - more taxes on insurance cos
    - more taxes on people earning over $200k
    - reduces deficit
    and, oh yeah, 32 million uninsured covered! (I know I said it twice but it’s worth it)

  • allthingsinaname

    This is it square. It is this or nothing. I can’t remember the last time I got everything I wanted. It is time to move forward.

  • nflfoghorn

    It was Xmas 1970 for me :) I hear a ‘Stones song coming on….

  • newfreedomblog

    Approximately $85 billion of that reduction would be on-budget; other effects related to Social Security revenues and spending as well as spending by the U.S. Postal Service are classified as off-budget. CBO has not completed an estimate of the potential impact of the legislation on discretionary spending, which would be subject to future appropriation action.

    .
    So in other words, this bill does not “save” 138 billion as our dear leaders have suggested or claimed, is that right Ms Pickert? The ”potential impact of the legislation on discretionary spending, which would be subject to future appropriation action”, would indeed potentially cost MORE money. Is that right Ms Pickert? The problem here lies in the fact the CBO cannot estimate ahead how much MORE money will be needed. In fact, impartial estimates have stated it will be in the cost range of 2.2 TRILLION dollars more in the next 10 years.
    .
    If you read further into the “tables”, which really do not give a good explanation of what it really means, I think you can also see that the coverage of people under this proposal / bill does not cover 97% of the people as we have been told. Not until the year 2016 do we see 95% in table 2, is that correct Ms Pickert? It seems that years 2010 to 2015 we are covering much less of those who are insured or “un-insured”. We are only covering 83% of the total population which is about what we have now covered with insurance under no healthcare reform plan. I was under the impression we were going to be able to insure more people.
    .
    I love this little notation at the bottom of page 1 of 2, ”d. The count of uninsured people includes unauthorized immigrants as well as people who are eligible for, but not enrolled in, Medicaid. I find this interesting that Joe Wilson was vilified for his shout out to the President “You Lie”, this vindicates Mr Wilson now, doesn’t it Ms Pickert?
    .
    I would be very curious if you could define the following “changes”, and what impact they have with this bill, Ms Pickert. I have put in my thoughts as to what it means in the ( ).
    .
    3025 Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
    (From my understanding the goal is to reduce re-hospitalizations, this will be achieved by penalizing hospitals and doctors if a patient is readmitted to the hospital due to let’s say for example Congestive Heart Failure, is that correct?)
    .
    2703 State Option to Provide Health Homes for Enrollees With Chronic Conditions
    Community First Choice Option
    (I believe this is a new program to provide services in the home rather than in the hospital, but I am not sure on it).
    .
    2301 Coverage for Freestanding Birth Center Services
    (Would this be funding for abortion clinics?)
    .
    2303 State Eligibility Option for Family Planning Services
    .
    3022 Medicare Shared Savings Program
    .
    3112 Revision to the Medicare Improvement Fund
    .
    3131 Payment Adjustments for Home Health Care (includes effect
    of section 3401)
    (Is this a reduction in the amount of money currently paid out to Home Health Agencies?)
    .
    3136 Revision of Payment for Power-Driven Wheelchairs
    (Is this the elimination or greatly reduces the government payments for powered wheel chairs for Seniors?)
    .
    3201 Medicare Advantage Payments (This is the part and percent of reduction in Medicare Advantage Programs?)
    .
    3301 Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program (close donut hole?)
    .
    3308 Reducing Part D Premium Subsidy for High-Income Beneficiaries
    (This is basically an estimate of savings from paying for drugs for those seniors with high incomes, meaning they will now based on income pay for their medications?)
    .
    3401 Revision of Certain Market Basket Updates and Incorporation of services
    Productivity Improvements into Market Basket Updates that do not
    Already Incorporate Such Improvements (effect of productivity adjustment
    for home health included in estimate for section 3131)
    (Would this be more reduction in the amount of reimbursements for Home Health Agencies?)
    .
    Total, Changes in Unified-Budget Deficits (The difference in my calculations show that they will take from Medicare Advantage programs approximately 200 billion dollars of funding currently being given out to HMOs to provide “enhanced” services).
    .
    Total Changes in Unified-Budget Deficits
    for Title I and Subtitle B of Title II (This is basically the “savings” from the budget, 82.1 or about 82 billion dollars from 2010 to 2019)
    .
    All in all this report reflects the $500 Billion in cuts to Medicare which Seniors now currently enjoy. 1/2 of the savings in this reform plan comes at the expense and on the backs of seniors. They will pay for this reform to allow those who do not have insurance to be “subsidized”. People who are able bodied for the most part, but do not make enough money to afford healthcare or choose simply not to buy it. In my mind, it shows how little we care about Seniors, and now are going to take money away from them to give to others.
    .
    In other words, “Redistributing the wealth”.
    .
    The rest of the money, $500 BILLION will be made up in the form of additional taxes, taxes on current health benefits which we do not pay tax on presently, and fee from equipment companies. Hospitals will see cuts in their reimbursements, and thereby increase the private insurance rates.
    .
    This is truly a BAD BILL don’t you agree Ms Pickert?

  • http://www.yahoo.com melpol

    Nationalized health care is only the first step toward the dream of universal medical care. Quality medical attention should be provided to the poor natives of Africa, Brazil, and in ghettos of big cities. The name will be SHARE THE CARE. It will create a world where strangers can become brothers and sisters. The capitalist system will remain unchanged. The rich will then be in charge of distributing wealth evenly among the poor. That dream will soon become a reality.

  • newfreedomblog

    “The capitalist system will remain unchanged. The rich will then be in charge of distributing wealth evenly among the poor. That dream will soon become a reality.”

    .
    The socialist sytem will remain unchanged. The rich people will no longer be rich, and everyone will be treated the same. Capitalst systems will have died, and hunger will prevail around the world. The dream of socialists will soon become a reality”
    .
    There I fixed that for you melpol.
    .
    By the way, I am just curious, has a poor man ever given you a job?

  • twentyfirstcenturyamerican

    “The capitalist system will remain unchanged. The rich will then be in charge of distributing wealth evenly among the poor. That dream will soon become a reality.”

    .
    The socialist sytem will remain unchanged. The rich people will no longer be rich, and everyone will be treated the same. Capitalst systems will have died, and hunger will prevail around the world. The dream of socialists will soon become a reality”
    .
    There I fixed that for you melpol.
    .
    By the way, I am just curious, has a poor man ever given you a job?

    newfreedomblog

    Is melpol expected to answer the questions based on her statement or your distortions of her statement? It is like one of those rhetorical questions of the republicans on caricatures of the democratic bills. Again, who is talking about dismantling capatalistic economies. As a person who lived in Canada, I know how excellent is their healthcare, and the last time I checked the rich people there haven’t become poor. Singapore is a capatalistic economy, but the healthcare there is way better than that in USA with Govt. run Universal Health Care competing with private insurance companies. It only costs them only 9% of GDP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Singapore

  • aussifaire

    HOW WILL USA PAY FOR THE HEALTHCARE BOONDOGGLE

    LATEST HEALTHCARE IS THE SAME ORGINAL HC OBAMA & DEMS WERE PEDDLING UNDER THE LABEL OF SOC HEALTHCARE….

    1. USA WILL BECOME SHARIA LAW MUSLIM OWNED NATION U NATION DICTATOR TO USA PULIC….USA PUBLIC WILL LOSE ALL RIGHTS & FREEDOMS EFFECTIVLY DESTROYING OUR CONSTITUTION SO ANY CITIZEN WILL BE ABLE TO BE ARRESTED BY ANY MUSLIM & ON TRUMPED UP CHARGES THROWIN INTO JAIL WITHOUT TRIAL, WITHOUT PROTECTION FROM DOUBLE JEOPARD & WITHOUT NEED FOR UNANIMOUS VERDICT–FOREVER

    2. USA PUBLIC WILL BE FORCED TO SURRENDER ALL HEALTHCARE TECH & TECH TO OUR ENEMIES WHOM WILL TURN AROUND AND DEPRIVE USA OF THEM FOREVER.

    3. USA PUBLIC WILL BE FORCIBLY DEPRIVED OF CLEAN WATER, CLEAN FOOD, POTENT VITAMINS & PROBIOTICS

    4. BEST AND MOST COST EFFECTIVE INSURERS WILL BE PUT OUT OF WORK CAUSING HEMORRAGING JOB SECTORS.

    5 USA TAXES WILL 3/4 TO DOUBLE FROM PRESENT SO IF YOU PAY 1000.00-15,000 DOL PER YEAR CURRENTLY—YOU WILL BE PAYING 17,500–30 THOUSAND PER YEAR.

    6. UTILITIES SLATED TO AT LEAST DOUBLE-TRIPLE YOUR CURRENT PRICE–SO EVEN IF YOUR MORTGAGE IS PAID OFF IF YOU CANNOT PAY THE TAXES YOU ARE OUT ON STREET

    7. GOVERN WILL BECOME AN ILLEGAL DICTATOR WHOM WILL DO ILLEGAL PRICE FIXING TO KEEP PEOPLE & BUSINESSES FROM BEING ABLE TO AFFORD ANYTHING OTHER THAN SOCIALIST HEALTHCARE —-THIS LATEST ONE IS ORIGINAL SOC HEALTHCARE THAT OBAMA PROPOSED WHEN FIRST ATTEMPTED TO PASS IT COMPLETE WITH FORCED EUTHANASIA & DEATH PANELS FOR PUBLIC.

    8. DUE TO UNENDING SPENDING USA PUBLIC WILL BE LEFT WITHOUT MEDS INDEFINITELY….

    9. NO ONE WILL BE ABLE TO AFFORD THEIR HOMES BECAUSE USA PUBLIC WILL BE TOO BUSY PAYING TAXES & FEES TO EVERY ILLEGAL ANYBODY.

    10. SO…. THE ILLEGAL ANYBODIES WILL BE THE ONLY ONE’S ABLE TO AFFORD TO LIVE IN USA PUBLIC HOMES SINCE THEY LIVE HERE TAX FREE

    11. USA PUBLIC HAS NO RIGHTS AND WILL BECOME THE NEW—MINORITY EXPENDIBLE SLAVES TO EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN ON THE PLANET WHOM WANTS TO COME LIVE IN USA FOR THE ULTIMATE PRIZE PAY OFF OF LIVING TAX FREE WHILE THE PUBLIC AWAITS CERTAIN DEATH ON THE STREET WITHOUT FOOD MEDS OR SHELTER OR JOBS.

    12. ALL SMALL BUSINESS WILL BE SHUT DOWN AS THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE FEES & TAXES & RULES IMPOSED ON THEM BY GOV.

    SO KIDS YOU CAN FORGET ABOUT FOREVER HAVING—

    a. JOBS–that pay more than a pittance IF THEY PAY AT ALL.
    b.MP3′S
    C. IPOD’S
    D. WEB
    e. web based business EVER
    F. GOOD HEALTH because childrens IMMUNE SYSTEMS ARE NOT FULLY FORMED and unable to fight off even the most minor scraps & scratches without MEDS let alone anything major.

    BECAUSE THE ONLY ONE’S WORKING/PARTYING HEARTY are the TOO BIG TO FAIL COMPANIES EVERYONE else will be OUT OF WORK AND 1 OR 2 DOLLAR A DAY WELL FARE—BECAUSE THE DEMS JUST LIKE ANY TRUE PROGRESSIVE HATE PROFIT FOR ANYONE EXCEPT THEIR TOO WASH DC SLUGS & TOO BIG TO FAIL COMPANIES on BAILOUT OF COURSE…. because PROGRESSIVE’S DON’T FEEL THEY SHOULD HAVE TO RUN THEIR BUSINESSES EFFICIENTLY WHEN THEY HAVE A GULLIBLE PUBLIC TO PAY FOR THESE BUSINESSES IRRESPONSIBILTY.

    DID YOU KNOW AN UNTREATED EAR INFECTION WILL CAUSE PERMANT HANDICAPPING/DEATH ESPECIALLY IN CHILDREN

    DID YOU KNOW??? ALLERGIES/ASTHMA LEFT UNTREATED WILL CAUSE PERMANT HANDICAPPING/DEATH ESPECIALLY IN CHILDREN???

    WELL….DEMS DID AND STILL WANT TO SELL THE USA DOWN THE RIVER EXPECTING THE UNSUSPECTING USA PUBLIC TO PAY FOR HEALTHCARE BY EXISTING WITHOUT FOOD MEDS HOUSING JOBS & WITH THE LOSS OF FREEDOM & LOSS OF LIFE …SO DEMS CAN LIVE ON PORK AND EVERY ILLEGAL ANYBODY MOOCH OFF THE PUBLIC.

    seek legislative and LEGAL action to get OBAMA HC & stimulus and bailout kicked out see American center for law and justice OR GOOGLE the problems with socialized health care OR GOOGLE handsoffmyhealth.org OR GOOGLE bigGovhealth.org OR stoptheaclu.com OR Southeastern Legal Foundation OR health science institute OR familysecuritymatters.org

  • newfreedomblog

    Well 21st, I really do not expect a dyed in the wool socialist to respond back to me. I was simply making a statement.
    .
    But, if you agree that rationing of healthcare will solve all of our problems here in the US with our healthcare problems then I or anyone else with even an ouce of brains will convince you otherwise.
    .
    You see 21st, I happen to believe in personal responsibility. Responsibilty for ones actions, their work, and their ability to take care of their own needs and not give up their freedom to a Government which may or may not be there when you need it.
    .
    When people depend upon a Government to meet their basic needs in life, they become useless, despondent, depressed and worthless to society. The socialist societies of the past Russia, Cuba, Venezuela and China have proven socialism does not work.
    .
    Now to be honest, I do understand the far left’s fight to bring about a neo-socialist/neo-capitalist system, but it will not work. In theory it sounds great. But in fact and basis of economics it fails.
    .
    I personally believe we have gone over 230 years in our history quite well. There have been ups and downs, but nothing to the degree we have witnessed from the ex-Communist/Socialist countries I mentioned above or those in Europe which have your neo-socialist principles in use today. Germany, England, France are all failing. Their hold on the world economy is one crisis away from total collaspe and bankruptcy. I just believe we should not go down that road.

  • aussifaire

    HOW HIGH A PRICE THE PUBLIC IS EXPECTED TO PAY FOR NEW HEALTHCARE….

    THE LATEST healthcare IS THE SAME SOC HEALTHCARE OBAMA & DEMS WERE ORIGINALLY PEDDLING COMPLETE WITH FORCED MANDATORY EUTHANASIA & DEATH PANELS FOR USA PUBLIC AND VETS ETC.

    THE USA PUBLIC will be FORCED TO PAY FOR HEALTHCARE BY BEING CRIMINALIZED & SOUGHT for PROSECUTION AFTER deprived from MEDS & HEALTHCARE IF THE USA PUBLIC SEEKS TO FIND HEALTHCARE FOR THEMSELVES OR THEIR CHILDREN WITHIN OR WITHOUT THE USA BORDERS.

    SO….To the present it’s only one of the 1 % group of people attempting to destroy our Nation’s economic systems.

    WHY??? It was said to a WASH DC VIP—that the reason the Socialists think they will win this time and are doing this is because ACLU and their DEMS SLUGS — they don’t think American’s are ” smart enough” to care to let their fingers do the walking to protect their lands, their CONSTITUTION or their freedoms. The DEMS and ACLU don’t think the 99% of American’s will be ‘smart enough” to CARE about their country, their homes, their small business enough to kick the WASH DC SLUGS out and send them packing by way of Balagovich for NOT doing what is right to protect PUBLIC freedoms and the free enterprise system (ie meaning small business/med business) and rights.

    seek legislative and LEGAL action to get SOC HEALTHCARE & stimulus and bailout kicked out see American center for law and justice OR GOOGLE the problems with socialized health care OR GOOGLE handsoffmyhealth.org OR GOOGLE bigGovhealth.org OR stoptheaclu.com OR Health science institute OR familysecuritymatters.org

  • twentyfirstcenturyamerican

    newfreedomblog, you are taking extreme examples of communist Governments such as Russia to make your case. Nobody here is advocating for a communist dictatorship. We have successful democracies such as UK, Canada, France, and Germany, which have both capatalistic economy and social security. You are saying they are failing, but I see they are thriving. Personal responsibility is a good thing, but shared responsibility is better. I don’t know whether you are multimillionaire, but if you are some like me, you will understand the troubles associated with losing a job for no fault of yours (but some bungling of the management, e.g. Enron). When I lose the job, you share my healthcare costs, and when you lose, I do the same. What is wrong with that kind of social contract? Next, we are in an advanced and more civilized society that has departed from the Spartan culture of killing the weaklings. Does your logic that every body should be responsible for his own healthcare hold good for kids with disabilities? Shouldn’t the members of a civilized society shell out some money from their pockets, and pay for them? Your logic suggests that it will also be a denouncable socialistic move. You won’t definitely agree with the CBO score and their findings that this bill will reduce deficits. But, if we could waste trillions of dollars on unjustified wars such as the one in Iraq, why can’t we spend a trillion for the better facilities for the citizens of our country?

  • dophouse

    We got our first Black President, They want him to fail

    They say if you ain’t Conservative, You going to Hell,

    But my God don’t play no Politics

    If he had to vote I bet it’d be Obama b*tch!

    Ya’ll fools more dumb than Potsie

    How you gonna call a Black Man a Nazi

    Those are some lyrics, now check out the video for

    SOMETIMES I… by Macarone

    Download free at http://www.thedopincrecords.com

  • bspotts

    Don’t brag about the UK system. Simple fact check: has anyone looked at their teeth? UK obviously can’t afford or don’t know about braces. Please take the time to do some research on subjects BEFORE you write and less time looking ignorant. Please!

blog comments powered by Disqus