Harlem Politics: A Shabby End To A Golden Era

In an excellent story for TIME.com, our colleague Alex Altman looks at what two scandals say about the storied political launching ground for trailblazing African-American politicians.:

Rangel and Paterson’s father Basil were members of Harlem’s Gang of Four, along with Percy Sutton — a civil rights activist, lawyer and local power broker, who died Dec. 26 at 89 — and David Dinkins, who served as mayor of New York City from 1990 to 1993. The group inherited a tradition passed down from trailblazers like Adam Clayton Powell Jr., whom Rangel unseated in 1970, and together shattered scores of racial barriers, attaining offices once dismissed as off-limits and paving the way for the ascension of black leaders around the country. In the process, they turned Harlem — long the epicenter of African-African culture — into a political mecca, its pull strong enough to entice former President Bill Clinton to base his foundation headquarters on the district’s main thoroughfare of 125th Street. But with Rangel, 79, giving up his gavel, the Paterson era in Albany lurching toward an end and Dinkins having long since stepped away from the scene, Harlem’s political might has diminished.

But the story also speaks to a brighter note of generational change:

Instead of coming up through Harlem’s political machine, the newest batch of African-American leaders — stars such as Obama, Newark Mayor Cory Booker and Alabama Representative Artur Davis, Rangel’s colleague on Ways and Means — have risen through the traditional channels of the U.S. meritocracy, says David Bositis, an expert on black electoral politics at the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies in Washington. “These guys are Ivy league, corporate-law-firm types,” Bositis says. “You’re talking about a very different political system than what Basil Paterson, Dinkins and guys like that grew up in.” Going forward, he adds, there will be “competing centers of black leadership around the country, but they’re not going to occupy the same level of status that [Harlem] did.”

Related Topics: african-american politics, charlie rangel, david paterson, harlem, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “what two scandals say about the storied political launching ground for trailblazing African-American politicians.”

    The story of changing politics and demographics in Harlem has nothing to do with Rangel and Patterson.
    .
    The same story was true a month ago.
    .
    Or did I miss something?

  • spob

    I grew up in NYC. I actually, believe it or not, helped the Dinkins campaign when I was in HS. (My dad is a Democrat and worked for the Dinkins campaign.)
    .
    Dinkins should not be mentioned favorably in a paean to Harlem politics. Dinkins was an appallingly bad mayor. For example, when a police officer was shot and almost killed by a drug dealer and only saved himself by accessing his reserve piece, Dinkins visited with the drug dealer’s family. (Nice.) Also, during racist riots against Jews in Brooklyn, Dinkins held the police back, preferring to let criminals run loose. Yankel Rosenbaum paid for his life with that decision. (And, funny how the racism inherent in the acquittal of the assailant never gets discussed.)
    .
    You also forget how corrupt Adam Clayton Powell Jr. was (certainly relevant here, given Rangel’s obvious corruption). He was booted from the House. (And there’s a Supreme Court case named after him, Powell v. McCormack–one that Barack Obama, noted Con Law scholar, seemed to have forgotten when he opined that the Senate could refuse to seat Burris.)
    .
    As for Rangel, the shabbiness really is the fact that he’s gotten away with it for so long. He’s a tax cheat (let that sink in–in an era of exploding deficits, and someone who wants to raise taxes on others).
    .
    JNS, in another thread, talked about how the GOP is held to a higher standard on issues of family morality. Are these black Democrats getting the benefit of more favorable write-ups than is deserved? I think so.

  • sacredh

    It’s not a black thing or a white thing. It’s a corrupt thing. Both Nixon and Agnew resigned. The President and the Vice President. The whole ticket left office in disgrace. They weren’t held to a higher or lower standard. They were held to A standard. Times change. Corruption stays the same.

  • nflfoghorn

    Help me out – do Charlie Tuna’s problems stem from what he knew or what he should’ve known?

  • sacredh

    What did he know and when did he stop knowing it?

  • stuartzechman

    Jay Newton-Small:
    .
    This piece is even more interesting for what it says about the premises of writer (and editor) than for its subject matter:

    the traditional channels of the U.S. meritocracy

    What?
    .
    Umm…What channels are those?

    Ivy league, corporate-law-firm types

    As recent events in the financial sector have evidenced, and as the dynasticization of US politics continues to demonstrate, “meritocracy” is hardly an appropriate word to describe the system through which elites come to prominent power.
    .
    That premise –that the traditional corridors of Ivy League privilege and Mergers & Acquisitions are repositories of the best people” “risen” through a “meritocracy”– is pure mythology, or, at the very least, entirely debatable. Social connection to elites is more and more the true prime mover of peoples’ careers these days, not merit, right, Jay Newton-Small? Surely you wouldn’t say that’s a radical idea, would you?
    .
    But there it is, in all of its smug, declarative glory “the traditional channels of the U.S. meritocracy.” That’s the ideology of the press corps on naked display, not reportage. I’d certainly like it if our system were meritocratic, but, it seems like a legitimate, reality-based observation to make that we are sliding into more of an aristocratic hierarchy.
    .
    Access to the Ivy league, and to corporate-law firms is just as much the result of inherited privilege or connection to privilege than individual merit, so how is it that a writer (and editor) could ignore vast evidence of experience, and lovingly write about the current system as if it were the pure, utilitarian expression of “the best of the best?”
    .
    Especially after the financial collapse, some of us are making the argument that “traditional channels” aren’t meritocratic at all –that this is a big problem for our system!
    .
    Do you see now why the left calls the press corps “the corporate media,” Jay Newton-Small? Can you at least understand why that phrase has such currency?

  • kevin

    Talk about the meritocracy reminds me of this anecdote:
    .

    “I remember back in the late 1990s, when Ira Katznelson, an eminent political scientist at Columbia, came to deliver a guest lecture. Prof. Katznelson described a lunch he had with Irving Kristol during the first Bush administration.
    .
    The talk turned to William Kristol, then Dan Quayle’s chief of staff, and how he got his start in politics.
    .
    Irving recalled how he talked to his friend Harvey Mansfield at Harvard, who secured William a place there as both an undergrad and graduate student; how he talked to Pat Moynihan, then Nixon’s domestic policy adviser, and got William an internship at the White House; how he talked to friends at the RNC [Republican National Committee] and secured a job for William after he got his Harvard Ph.D.; and how he arranged with still more friends for William to teach at Penn and the Kennedy School of Government.
    .
    “With that, Prof. Katznelson recalled, he then asked Irving what he thought of affirmative action. ‘I oppose it,’ Irving replied. ‘It subverts meritocracy.’ “

    .
    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2009/jan/28/campos-to-the-manner-born/

  • freeinpa

    Only the left can turn an article about 3 corrupt liberal politicians and a less than mediocre mayor into pot shots at conservatives.

    What a sad little world you live.

  • nflfoghorn

    What planet are you currently residing, Spooooob? I thought Kevin’s story was very appropos.

  • afguy

    That planet’s location has already been clearly identified.

  • kbanginmotown

    kevin: Great story. ‘Splains a lot, really…

  • freeinpa

    Responses as expected from twiddly- dee and dwiddly do, the wonder dummies.

    Yes appropo of saying look that way not at the corrupt fools we are. It’s them not us!

  • stuartzechman

    KT:
    .
    I’m a caffeine-deprived ass.
    .
    Please forgive me for calling you “Jay Newton-Small.”
    .
    I was literally without my glasses typing that up.
    .
    Whoops.
    .
    Hey, new media is all about correcting idiotic mistakes transparently, and then moving on, right?

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Both sides have thugs and idiots and crooks. When they come up, the Democrats consistently call for their heads. However, we’ll still stop for a minute and thank those who helped achieve great things (such as blasting open doors for other Black men and women to follow through) before we go and lynch them.
    .
    Yes, perhaps there’s a bit of rose colored glasses here, but considering the focus is on how these Harlem politicians gave both Harlem and the black community more authority within the nation, I think we can forgive the other transgressions long enough to comment on how the authority of Harlem and that era of politician is vanishing. Individuals such as yourself and Joe Klein obviously do so with a sigh of relief and a statement of “about time” for the reasons you state and you’re well welcome to that position, but it doesn’t make it a double standard to comment on how there is a changing of the guard or to give an obituary on their impact in this world (after all, when obituaries are run, we often forgive the crimes to highlight the accomplishments).
    .
    It would be a double standard to expect or want them to be forgiven in a court of law or want them to stay in power despite their crimes. That is not what is being stated by any corner.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    What can be seen here, in part, is a non-racial matter that middle class and working class people have no chance at making it in politics today.
    You first need a huge amount of money and/or connections to people with huge amounts of money.

    Obviously it is great that some of our elite are no longs white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, but, it’s not the same thing as somebody from the neighborhood making it big and standing up for his people in congress.

    Obviously this isn’t the Hollywood ending you would want for any of them, either.

  • spob

    “Individuals such as yourself and Joe Klein obviously do so with a sigh of relief and a statement of “about time” for the reasons you state and you’re well welcome to that position, but it doesn’t make it a double standard to comment on how there is a changing of the guard or to give an obituary on their impact in this world (after all, when obituaries are run, we often forgive the crimes to highlight the accomplishments).”
    .
    Unless it’s Al Haig, who gets a shiv.

blog comments powered by Disqus