Bunning Caves

More than five days after he began but two days too late to prevent a cut off in services that will now have to be fixed retroactively, Senator Jim Bunning gave up his one-man filibuster of a $10 billion bill to extend unemployment benefits for 30 days. The measure passed with large bipartisan support 78-19. The Kentucky Republican said he opposed the bill because it was not paid for and had demanded votes on three amendments that offered alternate financing. In the end, he got a vote on one amendment, which failed, that would’ve used stimulus money to pay for the bill. From Bunning’s statement:

“For too long Congresses controlled by both Republican and Democrat majorities have not done a good enough job of controlling the spending of the taxpayers’ money.  My stand over the last couple of days was not against those Kentuckians who are on the unemployment line.  I support the underlying legislation and support those who are out of work and need a helping hand.  What I do not support is the hypocrisy displayed by Senate Democrats.  Just over a month ago Democrats passed pay-go legislation and then turned around and waived it for the next two major pieces of legislation that were considered by the Senate.  What was the point of passing pay-go legislation?  If Democrats continue to ignore their own rules I will oppose future legislation that is not paid for.”

That last shot across the bow probably scares Republicans more than Democrats. Bunning’s moves have played perfectly into the Democratic narrative that Republicans have become nothing more than a party of obstructionists. While Reid could’ve filed for cloture and held a vote after 30 hours of debate, Dems said they were sick of allowing Republicans hold crucial legislation that helps the most vulnerable Americans hostage to their whims. It’s the closest Senate Dems have come to forcing the GOP to filibuster a bill. And we may find out very quickly how serious Bunning is with his threat: Dems hope to vote by Friday on a year-long $150 billion extension on unemployment insurance benefits (which includes a retroactive fix) and business tax breaks, much of it unpaid for.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: bill, filibuster, jim bunning, pass, unemployment benefits, Budgets, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • deconstructiva

    I was waiting for your story, Jay, thanks and kudos. Now is your day done so you can catch late-night drinks or just go home and drink? I’m pondering Bunning’s line, “My stand over the last couple of days was not against those Kentuckians who are on the unemployment line.” If KY’s unemployment system is like most others, as you’ve mentioned, his state will suffer too. His Light Brigade Charge was precisely against his fellow Kentuckians, so why the hell did he say that canard? (sigh)
    .
    Anyhow, I’d still love to know who among his fellow R’s are arm-twisting him and who has his back. Is he mostly flying solo here, does he have tacit backing, or is he being set up for a huge fall? Thanks for your work today, Jay, and sleep tight.

  • the committee

    “the Democratic narrative that Republicans have become nothing more than a party of obstructionists”
    .
    To quote E.M. Forster: The king died and then the queen died is a story. The king died and then the queen died of grief is a plot. That Republicans are nothing more than obstructionists is just a bare fact.
    .
    Thanks for the info anyhow, J.

  • http://liberalspin.wordpress.com darkskinned

    “Just over a month ago Democrats passed pay-go legislation and then turned around and waived it for the next two major pieces of legislation that were considered by the Senate. What was the point of passing pay-go legislation?”

    That doesn’t sound like Obstructionist to me. If Bunning demands Democrats stick to their own rules, how is that obstructionism.

    Oh! I forgot this is Times we are talking about, so, when is the next Obama cover due?

  • pafro

    I am really interested in your Twitter report that Bunning has placed a hold on every one of Obama’s presidential nominees.

    Please, please say it is true. I would love to see Reid put some undersecretary responsible for checking toys for dangerous lead levels or something up for a vote tomorrow morning and have Bunning and his clown car start the tea-bagging all over again.

    After about a month of this I bet we would have a very different dynamic in the Senate.

  • bobcn1

    ‘If Bunning demands Democrats stick to their own rules, how is that obstructionism.’
    .
    It’s obstructionism because the dems ARE sticking to their own rules. Here’s the relevant section of the PAYGO legislation (which specifically exempts the unemployment funding extension):

    SEC. 11. EXEMPT PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.

    .
    ‘(g) Other Programs and Activities-
    .
    ‘(1)(A) The following budget accounts and activities shall be exempt from reduction under any order issued under this part: ….
    .
    ‘Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund and Other Funds (16-0327-0-1-600).

    http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2920/text

  • sambam23

    I think we’re seeing the beginning of the 2010 cycle of Republican Party overreach and self destruction.

    The Regressive party has forgotten the walloping they received in the last two national election cycles, and have gotten punch drunk on the favorable results in the last couple of elections in Massachusetts, Virginia and New Jersey. They feel energized by the emergence of the rabid right and the Tea Party anarchists over the last year.

    Let’s hope they continue with their obstructionism and egregious misuse of minority power in the Senate, and continue to oppose financial reform, healthcare reform, jobs bills, and other popular legislation through the summer. All the Democrats need to do is to look like reaqsonable adults and continue to bring legislation up for votes and let the Regressives fulminate and obstruct.

  • nflfoghorn

    Since JB’s promised to do this again and again, when will McConnell pull out the looney bin?

  • sasquatch08

    Bunning does seem to be a bit cantankerous of late, but in this instance he as a valid point. Democrats did agree to the Pay-Go rules, yet they seem to have an absolute inability or unwillingness to follow them.
    .
    Every piece of Democratic spending legislation of late has been marked as “emergency” and therefore not subject to Pay-Go. As a matter of fact the ONLY things that Democrats have subjected to Pay-Go have been Republican bills to cut taxes. That’s ridiculous, plain and simple. If the stimulus bill was such an emergency why has a large portion of it not yet been spent? Heck of an “emergency” that requires you to wait MONTHS to fix it… Like when a house is on fire, I’m sure we can wait about a week for the fire department to get the money so that they can “rush” to that location.
    .
    “That Republicans are nothing more than obstructionists is just a bare fact.”
    .
    Once again, I’m going to make a simple request. Please explain this statement. Up until the election of Brown in Massachusetts there weren’t enough Republicans in either chamber to actually stop a Democratic bill under any circumstances. It was 58-40 in the Senate with two independents who generally went with the Democrats, and 235-198 in the House with two vacant seats. The Republicans could all have gotten sick, gone home or died and the Democrats could still have passed ANYTHING THEY WANTED. Therefore there is no logical way that the Republicans can be “obstructionist” because they couldn’t obstruct anything if they wanted to! Please DO explain this statement, because I’ve seen it many times, I’ve always said the same thing and no one every answer. More often than not the thread dies, which I am starting to suspect is because no one on here has any facts to back up their talking points argument that the Republicans are obstructionist.
    .
    The real “bare fact” is that infighting within the Democratic Party is the problem.

  • choska

    It’s possible that the problem is BOTH Democratic infighting as well as Republican obstruction. The “conservative” Dems really don’t want health care or any other legislation that shifts income from the wealthy to the less wealthy.

    The Republicans want political power, and are willing to do anything to get it. Their – currently – winning strategy is to stop anything from happening in Congress and counting on a willing media to help lay the blame on the Democrats. Or, at least, they are counting on the media to have no memory of past Republican votes for unfunded programs, or for their historically high usage of the filibuster.

    For example, Jim Bunning once had a very different attitude towards borrowing money to pay for unemployment benefits: http://bunning.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsCenter.NewsReleases&ContentRecord_id=169be67f-0b60-4fe6-96bc-af3de696604f&Region_id=&Issue_id=

    This vote to borrow the money for the unemployed took place when Bush was borrowing huge amounts of money to pay for Iraq as well as for his tax cuts. The former was paid for “off the books” while the latter weren’t paid for with corresponding cuts in services.

  • markstev

    Jim Bunning is to the 2010 U.S. Senate what Gene Mauch was to the 1964 Philadelphia Phillies.

  • choska

    Took me some searching to learn about Gene Mauch and the 64 Phillies. I’d say that Mitch McConnell is Gene Mauch.

    Jim Bunning is to the 2010 U.S. Senate what Jim Bunning was to the 1964 Philadelphia Phillies. The only question is whether or not Bunning’s filibuster is him throwing a perfect game or him falling apart down the stretch.

  • artraveler

    Damn, I was hoping that Bunning would single-handily end the wars in Iraq and Afganistan, although the soldiers and marines would have to pay their own way home on Southwest!

  • kbanginmotown

    “Bunning Caves”
    .
    Are those near the “Mammoth Caves”?

  • FlownOver

    If there hadn’t been forty Senate Republicans committed to obstructionism as a partisan strategy, the handful of weak-kneed DINOs would have been irrelevant.
    .
    Obama campaigned successfully on a platform of bipartisanship, and the GOP leadership cynically decided “Well, that’s one thing we can guarantee he won’t accomplish; the country’s needs be damned.” Their scheme is to block any progress on anything, praying voters wrongly interpret their “success” at creating stalemate as Obama’s failure of leadership.
    .
    It’s the most cynical, anti-American course undertaken by a major party in many a year. It echoes the old example of “chutzpah” – the man who murders his parents, then begs for mercy on the grounds that he’s an orphan.

  • sacredh

    He’s a cunning runt.

  • sacredh

    During Bunning’s last eye exam:

    Jim, how many fingers am I holding up?
    .
    That’s right. One.

  • afguy

    I heard Bunning released his “hold” on the legislation because the “hold” on his bladder had also been released.
    .
    Votes weren’t the only thing that was about to begin flowing again…

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Dear Senator Bunning, you irritable and unfeeling Scmuck!
    _______________
    There are always exceptions to your high and mighty “ethical” adherence to so called fiscal conservativeness.

    There are people who NEED some help from government because of the way things stand. Desperate measures calls for more flexibility in the interpretation of existing “legistlative commitments” including the pay and go system Obama and his folks discussed.

    I never get tired of wondering WHY I was a Republican for SO long. These crusty old guard do not get it.

    It is bad out there for so many families. Men and women are in need of some governmental assistance to help them weather this passing chaotic economic depression to which “all” Americans are subject!

    Will this show people just how contrived the continued anti-Obama efforts refrain from the Republicans is just a pile of sell serving BUNK!
    These “Party of NO” folks do not want Obama to succeed because they are focused on getting a Republican in the White House.

    In a previous comment I called them JIHADISTS because they do not care about the collateral damage involved in carrying out their vile mission.

    Bunnings’s stance on this last bill inspite of the dire fall out HE KNEW it would create is an example of the Republican JIHADIST stance on every Obama initiative.

    I hope the Obama folks can continue to show these “JIHADIST Anti Obama Republican Party of Never anything good will come from Obama” to be baseless, venomous, sensationalist and contrived, for the most part, in their wild and continued opposition of this well intentioned and hard working President.

    What would please me to no end is if this soulless Senator not only lost his bid for re-election but took down good old short armed disconnected from the people McCain right along with him.

    At least that would be TWO of the fixtures in Washington who help uphold and enforce the “business as usual mantra” through their old boys network,GONE. :)

    From a man’s actions, so is he. Bunning is an unfeeling crusty old politician who needs to resign.

    Yes, this might seem extreme but at every turn the Republicans are calling for the resignation of the Obama folks. Bunning is a Republican and his conduct is so wicked and vile (in spite of his so called fiscal conservative basis) that he should probably resign. Extreme maybe but we live in an extremely charged political time.

    The political terrain might as well be a UFC match.
    It is all the blows and bleeding, as seen in UFC combat, with no physical waring– just high powered political battering and unrelenting attacks, and it STINKS.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/02/28/stalking-criminality-the-law-and-women/

  • afguy

    Every piece of Democratic spending legislation of late has been marked as “emergency” and therefore not subject to Pay-Go.
    .
    As opposed to the financing of the wars during the GWB years, which have been supplemental bills from the beginning, NEVER budgeted?
    .
    And it’s your therefore your position that the R’s are the party of financial responsibility???

  • afguy

    sasquatch,
    .
    You just triggered my “BS Meter” in a MAJOR way.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy
  • afguy

    This is just more of that sacred GOP “11th Commandment” BS.
    .
    You don’t hear any valid criticisms of your party because your fingers are jammed into your ears so tightly they’re about to touch.
    .
    NOTHING is ever YOUR responsibility. If legislation gets blocked because the GOP votes as a bloc, then it’s because of “Dem infighting” that it didn’t get passed. If they try to over-ride the obstruction, then they’re “ramming it down your throats”. Perpetual victimhood.
    .
    Let’s face facts, junior. You party had control for 8 years and they HAVE screwed things up royally. Failing to acknowledge that fact is not helping your cause. You’re just enabling the next round of thievery when your party gets the chance.
    .
    This “perpetual pity party” you are engaged in doesn’t help solve our problems. GOP present participation in the effort to solve these problems we are having seems to consist mainly of crossing their arms, sticking their lower lips out, and throwing things. Not very adult.
    .
    My MAIN problem with the conservative mindset right now is that the Tribal nature has apparently taken over. NO problems exist on your side of the aisle and your representatives are NOT to be criticized. Those only exist “over there”. Even when they don’t and it’s obvious for all to see.
    .
    When the Dems criticize one of their own, I have seen those here who comment on that as if it was a weakness on their part. It’s not. Inabilty to call out one of your own when deserved, now THAT’s a weakness, a very bad one. I might call it a flaw in character.
    .
    sasquatch, you want to be taken seriously and respected? Start acting like you deserve it.

  • afguy

    decon,
    .
    Oh, the hold-up was all over the TV here in Ky last couple of days, but you couldn’t see Bunning as a culprit anywhere.
    .
    In fact, Rand Paul and his followers held a rally supporting Bunning.
    .
    Thta name familiar? It’s Ron’s kid, running as a conservative Republican for Bunning’s seat.

  • http://2tiredofcrap.wordpress.com 2tiredofcrap

    It’s TOO freakin’ LATE! You’ve already shown America, Bunning/Republicants/GOP, that you want us to GROVEL and beg to get any sort of cooperation and assistance from you. But what REALLY grinds my beans is that this is NOT YOUR MONEY!!! Hard-working Americans have paid unemployment insurance TAXES for this right — and you want to DENY us what is rightfully OURS??!!! I for one am SICK and TIRED of the GOP’s ‘let them eat CAKE!!!’ attitude — anytime they are asked to cooperate and vote on ANY proposal that comes from Obama’s White House! It appears that it doesn’t even seem to MATTER what the proposal is — it could even be a proposal to assist YOU, you idiots! But as long as President OBAMA is doing the proposing, you SENILE geezers fold your arms, cross your legs and REFUSE to cooperate! Well, I want you to know that we hard-working Americans don’t take your indifferent attitude LIGHTLY! And we will LOUDLY voice our immense displeasure with the Republicants/GOP — at the POLLS!!!

  • deconstructiva

    Ron Paul’s kid? A conservative? Oh well, I guess he didn’t rebel against his parents to be a dope-smoking Che Guevara wannabe hippie. That’s too bad, holiday dinners at the Paul house would’ve been way more fun.

  • markstev

    choska,

    You missed the point.

    The late-Gene Mauch was not known merely for being the manager of the 1964 Philadelphia Phillies during their epic September collapse and ultimate loss of the National League pennant. That’s far too easy and broad a description.

    Instead, Gene Mauch was known as a bench jockey (the modern date equivalent of William Kristol or John P. Normanson), a loner, and despised far and wide for his arrogance and foul temper.

    It is these traits that Jim Bunning despised in Gene Mauch.

    It is these traits that Jim Bunning now displays on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

    So to accurately call Jim Bunning the Gene Mauch of the 2010 U.S. Senate is to both accurately describe Sen. Bunning’s behavior and to do so by likening him to a man, Gene Mauch, that Bunning despised as a ballplayer and loathes to this very day.

    Learn your history. Take a ride to Cooperstown. Read a wonderful book, “October 1964,” by the late-David Halberstam to understand the dichotomy then and now.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Yes, Bunning had a hold on all nominees which is why they had to file for cloture on yday’s nominee (which passed 90-0). I’m not sure if the hold still stands, I’m guess he dropped it. But I guess we’ll see when the next nominee comes up.
    JNS

  • sasquatch08

    First of all, no, it’s not my ”responsibility”, nor is it ”my party” because as I’ve said many times before I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, nor am I a conservative. Therefore “my party…” was not in control for the past 8 years. Therefore it has absolutely nothing to do with “helping my cause”, because my cause isn’t something you probably couldn’t understand even if you wanted to and which it’s clear from your vitriolic attack that you have no interest in anyway.

    Secondly, don’t call me “Junior”, you have no idea how old I am or what my credentials are and it also makes you sound pompous and detracts from your arguments by making you sound like you think you’re the smartest guy in America, which I highly doubt you are.

    I agree with Bunning on the substance of his argument in this case, I haven’t agreed with him much in the past and probably won’t in the future. Taking this one case where I said “…but in this instance he as a valid point” and supposing that you can draw conclusions about my political views or party affiliation based on that is hubris as well as one of the most imprudent statements I have seen here on Swampland.

    Third, Republicans criticize each other all the time. While I can’t prove it I would guess that really Right-Wing Republicans hate centrist Republicans even more than the Ultra-Left hates centrist Democrats. The criticism of Bunning by his own party is evidence that there are divides in both parties. That said; I am not surprised that Republicans don’t like either of the bills that have been proposed because they are as philosophically opposed to this sort of expansion of government as the Democrats would be to making abortion illegal nationwide. You’re suggestion that people on either side of the aisle can’t see anything wrong that’s not “over there” shows a serious case of confirmation bias, for which I’m sorry to say there is no cure except possibly reading some books and getting an education. This influx of information may, just may cause the removal of one’s head from one’s own rectum.

    Forth, I don’t care what your “main” problem is; apparently you have a laundry list of them including the inability to even use a spell check feature on a computer or the ability to not have a knee jerk reaction to something you don’t like. You’re down-talking and insults to my character in terms of “respect” prevent me from taking what you say your “problem” is seriously.

    Finally, I don’t care if you take me seriously and I have no need or wish for your “respect” because apparently that means I have to agree with you 100% on every topic and that’s not respect. Talking down to people will not get you very far in life and if you treat everyone the way you’ve just treated me I suspect your life is circling the drain and you probably don’t even know why. You’re like people I meet every day who talk and talk about “respect” but wouldn’t know it if it hit them in the face because they are incapable of showing any to other people.

    When you actually grasp the idea that you are not the smartest person in the world, that you don’t know everything about everything or person, gain the ability to make rational arguments without taking things totally out of context, gain the ability to not make knee-jerk statements that make no sense while simultaneously assuming that nine words can tell you everything about a person, stop acting like a spoiled child and stop talking down to people you disagree with; get back to me.

    Until then: good day sir.

blog comments powered by Disqus