Bunning Budges?

Third Floor U.S. Senate

The GOP Senate conference is downstairs having their weekly policy lunch on the second floor of the Senate. I hear Kentucky’s Jim Bunning is getting an earful in the meeting and rumors are swirling that he may cave and accept Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s offer to have a vote on his plan to use stimulus money to pay for the $10 billion 30-day extension of unemployment and health benefits (which will likely fail) before allowing a full Senate vote on passage.

Dems will probably be pretty disappointed in Bunning does actually blink. To them Bunning is the gift that keeps on giving: he makes their point about Republican obstructionism in a much more brutal way than Reid has ever had the cojones to do (ahem, Karen’s long time call to make them filibuster). In the last two days I’ve received 18 press releases from the DNC, DSCC or unions lambasting Bunning. One even pulled a phrase out of today’s Wall Street Journal story to highlight it to reporters:

Key Point: “Democrats used Mr. Bunning’s move to highlight what they said was a pattern of Republicans gumming up the works on even the most popular measures.”

It is absolutely ludicrous for Bunning, who voted for President George W. Bush’s unpaid-for tax cuts and the largely deficit funded Medicare Prescription Drug Program, to dig in his heels on this one small bill the failure of which causes so much pain to people already suffering. But, to be fair, this situation isn’t all on Bunning — at any time Democrats could’ve filed for cloture, waited 30 hours and passed them bill. They would’ve gotten cloture, too, given that a few Republicans, including Maine’s Susan Collins, have said privately or publicly that they would vote to overcome Bunning’s objection. But Dems have not done this because a) they thought Bunning would fold when they kept him here all weekend, and b) when he didn’t, they realized they were sitting on political gold (never mind the chaos that this expensive game of chicken is wreaking across the rolls of unemployed, the Department of Transportation and potentially millions of rural tv viewers). Either way, if Bunning doesn’t blink the Senate looks on track to pass a year-long $150 billion extension by Friday that would provide, retroactively, for all dropped benefits. Alas, Congress isn’t doing anything about the bureaucratic nightmares that will ensue from trying to back claim benefits or reapply for them for those who’ve been dropped from the rolls.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: filibuster, jim bunning, unemployment benefits, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Republican Party, Senate
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “Dems will probably be pretty disappointed in Bunning does actually blink.”
    .
    Maybe substitute DNC for Dems.
    More accurate and less cynical.

  • kevin

    It’s “cojones” not “kahonas.” Either way, Reid doesn’t have them.

  • jsfox

    I think the Dems should allow Bunning to have his way. The unemployment extension should be paid for. The 10 billion should come straight out of the Federal dollars that go to KY.

    KY gets $12,242 per resident ( the 4th highest in the nation) in Federal dollars per year which equals $52 billion per year. So just take away a fifth of what KY gets from DC and it’s paid for.

    Time to put your money where your mouth is Senator Bunning.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Huh….should I hope that Bunning caves or stands?

  • diecash1

    JNS — Don’t forget about the 21% cut to Medicare reimbursement rates for doctors that this obstruction caused.
    ..
    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/bunning-blockade-leads-to-21-percent-pay-cut-to-doctors.php

  • constantweader

    Congratulations, Jay! Republicans should pay you for devising a way to cast blame on the Democrats for Bunning’s careless behavior.

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • afguy

    How about “Bunning has a movement”?
    .
    Must be the Metamucil kicking in…

  • http://leetilson.wordpress.com leetilson

    While the Constitution allows the Senate to make its own rules (Article1, Sections 3 and 5), nothing in the Constitution allows one Senator to paralyze the government. http://tinyurl.com/one-senator-is-not-a-majority

    The Senate rules exist to serve our needs. These rules are not working. Change them.

    Lee Tilson
    http://www.rethinkingpatientsafety.com

  • grape_crush

    But, to be fair, this situation isn’t all on Bunning — at any time Democrats could’ve filed for cloture, waited 30 hours and passed them[sic] bill.

    Actually, the situation is all on Bunning, whose current example of GOP obstructionism is the cause. It’s the resolution of the situation that isn’t all on Bunning.

    Congress isn’t doing anything about the bureaucratic nightmares that will ensue from trying to back claim benefits or reapply for them for those who’ve been dropped from the rolls.

    Yup. We’ve been somewhat sheltered from the true costs and real-world effects of right-wing policy for quite some time. This is just one of many chickens that’s come home to roost.

  • steveeyes

    God…when are people going to wake up to the fact that Republicans represent one group of people….THE WEALTHY.

    They lie, distort the truth and use scare tactics (wmd, death panels) to get middle class voters support..but do nothing for the middle class when in office.

    Lets see.

    1. Under Bush, the Republicans gave the largest tax break to the richest Americans. They did it by reconcliation

    2. They want to maintain the status quo in health care so insurance company CEOs make lots of money to contribute to their campaigns.

    3. They start two wars and do not include the cost of the wars in the deficit numbers, yet complain about democrats accounting.

    4. Now this stunt by bunning…should we be surprised.

    For the life of me, I don’t know how anybody who makes under $100,000 a year would want to back liars, self-serving hypocrites and a platform of NO when it comes to passing laws that help middle class Americans (they say yes plenty of times to pass laws for the rich).

    I don’t want to hear this argument about the deficit. When the republicans consistently start to care about the deficit across the board, no matter how much money they make, then talk to me. Nor do I want to hear about distribution of wealth or socialism when Republicans pass laws to un-regulate and help corporate CEOs and distribute the wealth to the richest Americans by giving them the largest tax break under Bush. Republicans brand of socialism is to give the best health care and pass laws to make the rich richer.

    I must give credit where credit is due. Republicans are really good at pulling the wool over the eyes of those sheep who follow.

  • shakrai

    “For the life of me, I don’t know how anybody who makes under $100,000 a year would want to back liars, self-serving hypocrites and a platform of NO when it comes to passing laws that help middle class Americans (they say yes plenty of times to pass laws for the rich).”
    .
    I’m backing them in 2010 because I’m disgusted that the Democrat’s intent to “fix” our health care system by forcing everyone to buy into a broken insurance market.

  • kevin

    On the topic of filibusters, Steve Benen has another example — the nomination of Judge Barbara Keenan came through the Judiciary Committee six months ago, but was held up ever since then by an anonymous Republican filibuster. The Democrats finally got her through on a cloture vote which passed 99-0 and then her nomination was approved by another vote of 99-0.
    .
    No reason why the 4th Circuit Court or this universally praised judge had to wait six months. No reason at all, other than a desire to gum up the works.
    .
    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_03/022664.php

  • deconstructiva

    …re: cojones, I’d bet Hillary still has ‘em. Kevin, you’ve been on a roll as our resident spell / grammar check. I also found this, alas, in last paragraph…
    .
    “at any time Democrats could’ve filed for cloture, waited 30 hours and passed them bill.”
    .
    It should read: “at any time Democrats could’ve filed for cloture, waited 30 hours and passed that them there GD (gosh darned, yes?) bill.
    .
    Fixed it for you, Jay. Thanks for staying on this story. We’re all in this together.

  • braktalk88

    Oh damn, I clicked on this reading “Buldges”. It’s all boring now.

  • hellslittlestangel

    I’m a Democrat and I won’t be disappointed if Bunning caves. I care more about my country than I do about scoring political points.
    On the other hand, I also wouldn’t be disappointed if an anvil fell on the old bastard’s head.

  • hondagal64

    It’s about time America shut it down- good for him. Many …(about 50%) of those peeps on unemplyment, quit looking for work ,,,,long time back. They refuse to take jobs “beneth” them …because it is so easy to suck dry those of us, who are blessed enough to still have a job. I am glad to hear someone is finally saying ‘no more’ -and asking the important question, ‘where is the money coming from’ ?
    There are plenty of jobs to be had – might be less $ than that wonderful governemnt cash ….but, it’s time.
    Thank you Senator Bunning!

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    Haha, and here I thought it said “Bunny Budges”…just think, if we combine our misreading we’d have one hell of a story.

  • http://wubbis.wordpress.com wubbis

    As a loyal voting democrat for all of 3 years, the Democratic party has somewhat turned me off by their collective lack of backbone. Senate Democrats need to realize the advantage they have and strike while the iron is hot and negative thoughts of Bush (43) linger in the minds of the voting public. Come mid-term time, many of these same Democrats may find themselves sitting on their couches wondering just what went so wrong as Republicans capitalize on collective Democrat inaction and, frankly, the incompetence of Senate leadership. They can espouse change and hope all they want, but action is what we all need.

  • reformcobranow

    The idea that people become lazy everytime a recession rolls around defies the imagination as does the idea that someone who needs health insurance is a blight on society.

    For practical alternatives to COBRA, see http://www.cobrareform.weebly.com.

  • diecash1

    “Many …(about 50%) of those peeps on unemplyment, quit looking for work ,,,,long time back.”
    ..
    Do you have any actual facts to back up your diatribe? Without them, your rhetoric is as hollow as Bunning’s.
    ..
    “I am glad to hear someone is finally saying ‘no more’ -and asking the important question, ‘where is the money coming from’ ?”
    ..
    Too bad that ignorant douche Bunning waited so long to discover his convictions. Sure would have been useful when he was voting against PAYGO and voting for tax cuts for the wealthy, off budget and unfunded wars, unfunded expansion of Medicare (Pharma giveaway), etc.

  • diecash1

    Good plan….return to the nihilists that drove us into the ditch. Way to follow along. Not to mention the spectacular Ryan plan for healthcare and the economy. It’s no wonder your backing them with spectacular plans like that.

  • the committee

    Why is it that when Republicans weep and throw hissy fits, the story is REPUBLICANS SAD AND ANGRY, but when Democrats complain about Republicans, it’s “Democrats are very cynical to be complaining about Republicans.”

    Why is that?

  • the committee

    Also, the title of the post is misleading. It’s not suggested anywhere that Bunning has budged or is budging.

  • diecash1

    It’s all of those DFHs in the “librul” media………yeah, that’s it…….

  • diecash1

    The Republican spin continues. This is from Greg Sargent at The Plum LIne:
    ..
    The spin wars over the Jim Bunning hold on jobless aid are growing more ferocious by the minute in the Capitol. The latest: Senator John Cornyn is blaming the whole thing on health care reform.

    Cornyn, speaking to several reporters in a corner, laid the blame for the Bunning mess squarely on efforts by Congressional Dem leaders to pass their health bill.

    “This is something that could have and should have been worked out weeks ago,” Cornyn said. “But we’ve been spending so much time on a health care bill that the American people don’t want, a lot of things have gotten pushed to the back burner. And this is one of them.”

    “It’s the majority leader’s responsibility to run the floor, and this is a crisis, frankly, of his own making,” Cornyn continued.

    That seems a bit at odds with how the chronology unfolded. Bunning launched his filibuster of the bill — which would extend expanded unemployment benefits and health insurance subsidies for the unemployed — on Thursday night. Bunning’s objection was that he wanted the bill paid for with unused stimulus funds.

    But Bunning’s filibuster came after Reid and the GOP leader, Mitch McConnell, had agreed on a deal to allow a vote on Bunning’s preferred funding method. Bunning wouldn’t go along with that. And here we are.

    Still, we may be hearing more of the claim that the Dem pursuit of health care reform distracted Reid and prevented him from reaching resolution with Bunning, thus leading to the current disastrous impasse.
    ..
    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/cornyn-blame-the-bunning-hold-on-health-care-reform/

  • deconstructiva

    …lovely Jay added a question mark and wrote, “rumors are swirling that he may cave” (1st paragraph). Looks fine to me.

  • the committee

    I sense I’m walking into a trap by getting into a grammar argument with a deconstructiva ;) But I hate JNS almost as much as I hate Scherer, so I feel like I have to justify my nitpicking. I read “budges?” in the indicative, even with a question mark, and “rumors he may cave” in the subjunctive. So, saying different things.

    Well, I hope Bunning caves, right through a floor.

  • deconstructiva

    It must suck, so to speak, to have a state’s abbreviation match the brand name of a lubricant used down there. “The 10 billion should come straight out of the Federal dollars that go to KY” take on a “hole” new meaning: is Johnson + Johnson (other pharmas too?) getting Fed money?

  • deconstructiva

    …..nooooo, you’d win. I make many spelling / grammar errors; that’s why spell check is my frend.

  • underdog74

    are you kidding? the top level of unemployment benefits pay about the equivalent of $10 an hour – how is that “wonderful government cash”?
    .
    the issue is not “wow, this is so great, i have so much money by leeching off the government and i don’t have to work”, the issue is that job layoffs have been increasing while the job market shrinks.
    .
    also by blocking the benefits extension, leaving more than 1 million unemployed people broke and without any income, the economy will suffer even further…

  • iamsource

    I guess when it comes time to vote Republican or Democrat, Bunning has help the unemployed in their decision making process.

    No to unemployment benefits

    No to healthcare

    No to privacy

    No to due process

    I’m not sure I understand exactly where the patriotism part of the Republican outcry for Freedom really starts…

  • http://2tiredofcrap.wordpress.com 2tiredofcrap

    It’s TOO freakin’ LATE! You’ve already shown America, Bunning/Republicants/GOP, that you want us to GROVEL and beg to get any sort of cooperation and assistance from you. But what REALLY grinds my beans is that this is NOT YOUR MONEY!!! Hard-working Americans have paid unemployment insurance TAXES for this right — and you want to DENY us what is rightfully OURS??!!! I for one am SICK and TIRED of the GOP’s ‘let them eat CAKE!!!’ attitude — anytime they are asked to cooperate and vote on ANY proposal that comes from Obama’s White House! It appears that it doesn’t even seem to MATTER what the proposal is — it could even be a proposal to assist YOU, you idiots! But as long as President OBAMA is doing the proposing, you SENILE geezers fold your arms, cross your legs and REFUSE to cooperate! Well, I want you to know that we hard-working Americans don’t take your indifferent attitude LIGHTLY! And we will LOUDLY voice our immense displeasure with the Republicants/GOP — at the POLLS!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus