For All You Health Care Junkies

Campaign Diaries has taken a long, hard look at the House and published a rundown of members who are potential swing votes on health care. (The Democrats’ current strategy appears to have the House pass the Senate bill and then have both chambers pass a package of changes to that underlying legislation via simple majority.) Daniel Nichanian, of Campaign Diaries, has done his homework. He includes details that could indicate where these members might come down for a second health care vote. Of Kentucky’s Rep. Ben Chandler, for example, Nichanian writes:

The filing deadline has passed in Kentucky, and while the race could heat up Chandler doesn’t have to worry about facing a top-tier Republican. Will this encourage him to vote “yes”? He did support cap-and-trade. He’s a Blue Dog.

(h/t Jonathan Cohn)

Health care will probably come down to Nancy Pelosi. I’m with Karen – the Speaker hasn’t given us much reason to doubt her ability to gather votes, but we won’t know until the very last minute how this will turn out.

As for what’s next. It’s Wednesday – that’s when President Obama will reportedly give a speech providing guidance for how exactly Democrats should move forward. Expect details of that guidance to start trickling out tomorrow.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Collin Peterson MN-07.
    .

    I wouldn’t count Katherine Harris’ ex-boyfriend’s help Madam Speaker.

  • stuartzechman

    Kate Pickert:

    …have both chambers pass a package of changes to that underlying legislation…

    Knowing of course that the process and what will or won’t happen is surely the most fascinating aspect to this or any story (because it allows us to step into our beloved “objective analyst” role, in which personal opinions with respect to future events are allowed free expression without regard to journalistic conventions required to advertise objectivity –surely the most luxurious of respites to the dour tedium of professional political coverage), mightn’t we concerned citizens –sorry, “health care junkies” have just a bit of a crumb of reporting as to what exactly that “package of changes” contains?
    .
    Thanks so much in advance for indulging us in these kinds of obvious digressions, Kate Pickert.

  • square1

    Step 1: Pass Senate Bill.

    Step 2: ?

    Step 3: (Health insurance industry) Profit!!!

  • constantweader

    If we thought Ben Nelson, Blanche du Arquansau, Miss Louisiana Purchase & Liebermouth were bad, imagine what those largely unknown House conservaDems will put us through to claim their 15 minutes under the Kleig lights. Wake me when it’s over.

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • http://firstfarmandweatherreport.blogspot.com/ maxwelldog

    I think it’s a good guess to say the insurance companies are still balking at the concept.
    After all, it’s their “pre-existing” ailments that get ignored. (And omigod what do you mean we can’t drop that person?!)
    Profit?
    Not likely at 10% unemployment, but then, that’s improving, too.
    Profit?
    Yeah. Like interest, money for nothing counts for a lot in this country.

  • crosssection
  • square1

    Balking at the concept? Is this a joke? The insurance companies are salivating at the prospect of the government forcing the youngest and healthiest members of society to purchase their product.

blog comments powered by Disqus