Ethics Committee: Charles Rangel Broke House Rules

Rep. Charlie Rangel, the over-tailored New York Democrat, looked his best today at the health care summit, as he called for reform in his capacity as the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. “So what I would hope would happen is that we leave here not thinking that we’re going to start all over,” said Rangel. “This is the last year for a whole lot of people in the House of Representatives who we believe we represent the people, too.”

Presumably Rangel was not referring to his own numbered days in office, but he might have been. TIME’s Jay Newton-Small reports that the House Ethics Committee will release a finding Friday that Rangel violated House rules, the result of an ethics investigation of the Bronx Democrat that has lasted more than a year. (In the last quarter of 2009, Rangel spent more than $574,000 on lawyers fighting the charges, much more than he spent on his own campaign.)

It is not yet clear how serious the violation was or whether it will result in just a letter of reprimand or a loss of his chairmanship, or something else. A former Rangel employee, meanwhile, has launched a serious primary challenge, which will no doubt be helped along by these events. Republicans, meanwhile, have long been calling for Rangel’s ouster. As recently as last November, Rangel told the New York Times defiantly, “My credibility has never been challenged except by a couple of reporters.”

The questions about Rangel’s conduct run a wide gamut, from the disclosure that he was renting four rent-stabilized apartments in New York for thousands of dollars below market rates, to the revelation that he had unreported taxable income from a villa in the Dominican Republic, to questions about his fund-raising for an academic center named for him from corporate executives who were lobbying his committee.

UPDATE: The Associated Press reports that the Ethics Committee found that Rangel “knowingly accepted Caribbean trips in violation of House rules that forbid hidden financing by corporations.”

Related Topics: charles rangel, ethics, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Severe

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Craig Warga / NY Daily News via Getty Images

    Birth Control Debate: Why Catholic Bishops Have Lost Their Grip on U.S. Politics—and Their Flock

    The clash with the White House over birth control is a reminder of just how much influence the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has lost in the 10 years since the child sex abuse crisis erupted in America.

  • afguy

    … the over-tailored New York Democrat,…
    .
    Hmmm. MIkey, you wouldn’t be trying to frame this a certain way, would you??
    .
    Nah, ‘course not…

  • gysgt213

    I could have told you that and save some damn money at the same time. Rangel is compromised.

  • Paul-no not that one

    A pretty serious story gets the MS treatment.

    MS–since you have no original reporting here–was this just so you could put in the stuff about the clothes?

  • apr2563

    MS, in his most cynical passive agressive mode reports a serious story, thereby undercutting its value.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    Jay is on the road, she fed me her reporting. The stuff about the clothes is not derogatory. It is, however, one of the things that makes Rangel stand out from his caucus.

  • afguy

    That’s my guess, Paul.
    .
    An old ethical issue pretty much accepted to have happened, finally made official.
    .
    But, why pass up a perfectly good opportunity for one last dig by our “fair and balanced” liberal media?

  • afguy

    “Over-tailored” is NOT derogatory?
    .
    Exactly what turnip truck do you assume we fell from?

  • Paul-no not that one

    “The stuff about the clothes is not derogatory.”
    .

    “over-tailored” Maybe
    .
    “dapper” Maybe
    .
    Both? You were going for something, I just don’t want to guess what.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    I took out dapper. Did not intend to be derogatory. But I would challenge you to name another Congressman who makes as much of a statement with his clothes.

  • afguy

    “Dapper” is the term I consider to have some complimentary properties.
    .
    “over”-anything… not so much. Not sure you improved yourself much there.
    .
    You can take out both descriptives and not change the substance of the story one whit!

  • afguy

    Sorry… should have been a response to Michael at 3.5.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Thank you for engaging MS.

  • sacredh

    Barney Frank. That easy access zipper in the back of his pants is over-the-top by any definition.

  • afguy

    ‘Evening, sacredh. How was the Chinese food?

  • Paul-no not that one

    Ha sacredh say that to his face.
    .
    Frank and Waxman are the only two people in Congress who I would be afraid to face in hearings.

  • formerlyjames

    Hey, he is nothing if not dapper.
    .
    My plea to Rangel: please don’t hold a media event to issue a tearful apology. We are becoming jaded to this standard sociopathic tactic.

  • sacredh

    Pnnto: No thanks. I’ve seen Barney dismantle too many people to want to go anywhere near him. I joke about Barney (and the other 434) but he’s my favorite congressman without a doubt.

  • sacredh

    afguy: It was great. I just finished about a half an hour ago and ate a piece of Turtle cake with some ice cream for dessert. I’m just sitting here trying not to throw up until the game comes on at 8. I ate WAY too much.

  • formerlyjames

    How did Barney get into this?

  • sacredh

    formerlyjames: I overdosed on chinese food and responded to MS’s challenge to name a congressman that makes more of a statement than Rangel with his clothes. Some comments work. Some don’t.

  • sacredh

    I don’t know. I’d watch a real tear jerker apology. If he can make me cry, he gets parole. If I laugh, he has to serve another term.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    The Swamp staff has keyboard happy fingers today. Sheesh. Too many bloody posts for me to handle. All the good debates from yesterday…squandered and relegated to the annals of history it would seem.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Sacred,
    What game?

  • formerlyjames

    sacredh, you always send me into stitches of laughter, not only for your unexpected insight, but for the truth of it all. In this instance, whether you know it or not, you describe pretty much how parole boards work. You should work on getting a gig there, it pays good, no accountability, and being a political punk, you call your own hours.

  • sacredh

    Maybe they’re just leaving us a bunch of stuff for the coming weekend.
    .
    OT, but we’re getting another 4-10 inches of snow here tonight. Maybe single digits on the temperature too. Tonight would suck if the Cavs and Celtics weren’t getting ready to play. Gotta run.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Good luck with the snow. I, for one, am ready for Spring.

  • afguy

    Exiled,
    .
    LONG since ready here…

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Sacred:
    ~
    …but he’s [Frank] my favorite congressman without a doubt.
    ~
    I must say, domestic politics aside, I like Frank as well. The guy’s a straight shooter, and he doesn’t engage in the usual frivolity we have become so accustomed to with our politicians. This, from Frank, is especially pleasing to me:
    .
    Criticism of specific policies of any Israeli Government, at any given time, in no way implies that someone is anti-Israel, much less anti-Semitic. Indeed, if people want to hear at any given time, vigorous, even virulent criticisms of the Israeli Government in power, go to the Knesset, go to Israel. [...] There is certainly nothing remotely anti- Israel about being critical, any more than my saying that I deplore the Iraq War and I feel every day that I was right to vote against it. I do not think that makes me anti-American. And I do not think it makes me anti-Israel to say that some aspects of the occupation were wrong.
    .
    While he could have went much further, this statement is strikingly bold and pointed given the current political climate surrounding “discussion” of Israel. That, and he also refused to sign the Cantor-Hoyer-AIPAC letter to Obama demonizing the Palestinians, revering the Israelis, and undermining American sovereignty. Props, Frank, mad props.

  • afguy

    sacredh,
    .
    I’m still pissed about not having gotten to see the Celtics while in AF (and in AZ) while Bird was with them.
    .
    Asked once and was told that, to get a ticket for a Celtics-Suns game in Phoenix, you better be asking about the one about 3 years in the future.

  • spob

    “The questions about Rangel’s conduct run a wide gamut, from the disclosure that he was renting four rent-stabilized apartments in New York for thousands of dollars below market rates . .. .”
    .
    The questions you need to ask, MS, are as follows:
    .
    1) Has Charlie Rangel paid taxes on the difference between a rent at fair market rates and the rent-controlled rates he’s paying?
    .
    2) If not, why not?
    .
    3) If not, since this is in plain sight, why hasn’t the IRS audited him? And what about the state taxing authorities.
    ,
    4) And if those trips broke ethics rules, then were either gift taxes paid on them, or did Rangel declare them as income on his income tax returns?
    .
    It is beyond appalling in this day and age of tight budgets that politicians aren’t paying their full share of federal income tax. I pay mine. I expect that the IRS goes after pols.

  • stuartzechman

    Can’t see a reason why any of these suggestions would be controversial.

  • spob

    sz, reporters will never ever ever ask these questions.

  • spob

    give it up, these sleazeball pol gets caught and you’re whining about that. Pathetic.

  • sacredh

    afguy: I’ve been fortunate enough to have seen many of the all-time greats play. I have seen Bird, Magic, Kareem, Jordan, Shaq, Kobe, Ewing. Irving, Olajuwan, Duncan, Robinson, Wade and of course Lebron. A friend gave me an early birthday present in 1980. Game 6 tickets in Philly for the title game between the Sixers and Lakers. Magic was a rookie and had possibly the greatest rookie game ever. I still have my ticket stub. I reported off sick so that I could go. I very seldom do that (except for one 10 day stretch when I followed Pink Floyd around through 3 states).

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    You called in sick 10 days in a row, Sacred? Please tell me they canned your ass!

  • afguy

    No, spob, I accept the fact that Rangel did what he was accused of doing.
    .
    It’s the additional little digs that have NOTHING to do with the story itself that I take issue with.
    .
    EXACTLY what does “dapper” and “over-tailored” have to do with his financial activities?

  • spob

    It’s flyspecking–and Rangel is somewhat of a clothes horse.
    .
    See my comments below–that’s the real issue.

  • sacredh

    I had a broken finger from playing basketball. I could have worked light duty but decided seeing Floyd 4 times (Wish You Were Here tour) was too good to pass up. One side note. I was still partying then and spent the entire time trashed. We had a van and went from city to city. We got a little confused and stopped to ask a cop where we were. We were only five blocks from the stadium. He told us the street name and I said “No. I mean what state and city is this?”. I only had on cut-offs and sneakers with hair halfway down my back. It was a few hours before the show and the guy I was with asked the cop where we could find some hookers. The cop just laughed at us.
    .
    Exiled. Canned my ass? Please. I’m a lifetime federal employee. We have to kill someone to get suspended.

  • afguy

    spob, you have good points below, but so what if Rangel is a clothes horse? What does THAT have to have with the story about his financial dealings and the ethical findings?
    .
    Incidentally, I was not the only one that questioned the presence of those comments. They had nothing to do with the content of the story and could have been left out, without altering the validity of what Michael wrote whatsoever.

  • afguy

    So am I, sacredh. Are you sure murder is a valid termination guideline?

  • sasquatch08

    “My plea to Rangel: please don’t hold a media event to issue a tearful apology. We are becoming jaded to this standard sociopathic tactic.”
    .
    He won’t hold a tearful apology, he’ll do what that Republican House member (and every other politician/famous person does) did a few years ago with the second Congressional Page scandal he got caught up in. Resign and promise to go to some sort of rehab because “When I drink I do things I normally wouldn’t” or some other BS.
    .
    The sad thing is that the media will buy it, just like they did back then and he’ll fade away without any charges filed (if it’s the case they should be, I’m not saying this is the case) or anyone remembering what a lying scumsucking politician he was. Heck, I don’t even remember that Republicans name any more!

  • sacredh

    It depends on the circumstances. The boss would have to really dislike you (for some reason all of my bosses have liked me), you would have to be a slacker (I’m not) and you’d have to have zero entertainment value (N/A).

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    I think M.S’s description was quite mild actually. He could have said “Charlie (proof that you can polish a turd) Rangel, looked his best today at the healthcare summit”…..

  • afguy

    Whatever floats your boat, 2thirds…
    .
    says Speaks-to-Furniture.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I am just glad that none of you are in congress! We have a democrat upset at “overly tailored” and, out of the blue, somebody bringing up Barney Frank’s unusual orientation very publicly known. Is somebody going to bring up Larry Craig or are blogs ever going to be about issues, not just random personal attacks?

  • sacredh

    Thanks formerlyjames, but I wouldn’t trade the job I have for anything. I like the job, the outdoors and the people. I have fun at work and they pretty much let me do what I want to do. Of course it helps that the things they want done are the things I enjoy doing.

  • afguy

    Actually, patrick, I think you’ll find the comments concerning Barney Frank were not hostile but more “respectful” than they might appear to you.
    .
    The consensus is that, legislatively, Barney is one you’d want in your corner.
    .
    My point is that I’d like to see the reporting be about issues, not with little insults thrown in for good measure. I agree with you.
    .
    Unfortunately, I have the tendency to stay engaged long after it is obvious the conversation is going nowhere.

  • spob

    Larry “My Stance is Wide” Craig–always good for a few laughs.

  • afguy

    patrick,
    .
    What you have on this blog is a number who come, NOT for any real discussion, but a need to keep the pot stirred.
    .
    Do you have something constructive to add, spob?

  • sacredh

    patrick, it happens quite often on Swampland. We talk about the actual issue and when it dies down we just have fun. If you stick around you’ll notice that the more liberal members on here (I’m one) have a tendency to poke fun at even the politicians we like and respect the most. This is far from the first time we’ve talked about Rangel’s somewhat less than stellar ethical proclivities. We did savage Larry Craig. We went after Daschle with just as much venom. We don’t like crooks and cheats. It doesn’t matter if they’re members of our party or not. Barney could take any of us to the woodshed. We all know that. Also, the later in the evening, the worse/better we get.

  • freeinpa

    “EXACTLY what does “dapper” and “over-tailored” have to do with his financial activities?”

    It may have something to do with Rangel committign tax fraud and screwing the public. It goes to a public servant in custom suits who thinks he is above the law.

    You know how many corporate execs get roasted for havign expense tastes after being accused of fraud. Only difference they go to jail. Charlie will get a million taxpayer funded pension and a speaking tour.

  • afguy

    Well put, sacredh. It’s about bedtime for me.

  • spob

    I always do. Craig’s good for a little levity. Craig’s wide stance story–I wouldn’t believe that from my own son.

  • http://patricksartor.wordpress.com patricksartor

    I’m a newcomer to this and blogging. I run across Republicans who bring up Ted Kennedy and Chappaquiddick as if it happened this morning rather than an incident which should have been resolved with a trial more than forty years ago. I am also aware that Barney Frank is extremely respected for his work. Larry Craig… besides saying that he wasn’t gay, but just pleads guilty to soliciting gay sex in a public bathroom, was he known for anything like, say, legislation? Rangle looks like he violated some serious rules very recently. I’d like to know more about that part.

  • spob

    RE: Chappaquiddick. When you leave someone to die in an accident you caused, ya can expect people to bring it up.

  • sacredh

    Welcome to swampland patrick. I’ve only been blogging for two or three years myself and here at swampland for only 13 months. You can access any of the past threads by going to the Swampland categories section on the main thread page and then you can also go back through the months to any of the previous threads. You are going to find a broad spectrum of political views here. Some are very astute and others just aren’t. I think I fall somewhere in between. Have fun.

  • sacredh

    Time for me to hit the rack too. I’ve been up for over thirty hours and I’m a little punch drunk.

  • sacredh

    I don’t think the media really buys the whole rehab thing. They just realize that a good percentage of them are sick f**ks and are playing the game. They get to pretend they’re rehabilitating themselves and the media gets to pretend that reporting on scandals doesn’t give them a chub.

  • the committee

    “Jay is on the road, she fed me her reporting”

    Michael Scherer, the over-fed blogger…

blog comments powered by Disqus