The GOP’s Big Tent?

Take a stroll through CPAC’s exhibition hall this year and between the proffered candy, bumper stickers and key rings you can’t help overhearing some heated debates. At the end of the first row of exhibitors, next to the National Rifle Association, is a booth for the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property.

“That’s a lot of things to be worried about,” I remarked to the booth attendee.

“Yes,” he said smiling, “we have a lot of fingers in a lot of pies.”

These days, the group is particularly concerned with gays in the military. Beyond opposing the repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, the organization of lay Catholics would like to see all homosexuals banned from the military, according to a white and green pamphlet they were handing out. The case against gays in the military is laid out in a book, displayed prominently, called An American Knight: The Life of Colonel John W. Ripley, USMC, yours for just $14.95.

While I was flipping through the autobiography, a woman approached the booth. Catherine Sumner, it turned out, was part of GOProud, a group of openly gay Republicans and conservatives that for the first time is taking part in CPAC. “Is this your flyer?” Sumner demanded, waving the white and green pamphlet. Thus launched a debate about gays in the military that pretty much ended when the booth attendee told her that homosexuality is a sin and she’s going to hell.

“It’s insulting,” Sumner, 31, who edits a military magazine, said turning away. “Across the board the reaction to GOProud’s presence here has been positive, but then you have guys like this. Even Dick Cheney came out and says he supports us. Conservatives have to be more inclusive, they have to be.” In fact, just one group, Liberty University, boycotted CPAC over the inclusion of GOProud, though the Catholic crowd weren’t the only ones unnerved by their presence: one booth down from GOProud’s set up in the fourth row, those manning the National Organization for Marriage, which works to ban gay marriage, kept casting nervous – and slightly envious – glances at the somewhat larger crowd surrounding GOProud’s booth.

The tensions didn’t end there. Along the back wall 2004 World Poker Champion Greg Raymer stood waiting for a talk radio interview. “Focus on the Family considers poker immoral,” Raymer said, gesturing towards the Focus on the Family booth down an aisle. “They have no right to tell me what to do.” Raymer is at CPAC representing the Poker Players Alliance, which is lobbying to have a 2005 ban on Internet poker lifted – literally one of the last bills passed by the GOP before they lost control of Congress. “In the privacy of our own homes, consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want,” Raymer said. “Gambling is legal in America. They shouldn’t be mandating how we live. If they consider it a sin, they shouldn’t do it. But don’t tell me I can’t do it.”

CPAC has always been wonderful in its jumble of competing issue groups all jostling for attention. And it certainly has seen similar tensions in years past: this is the second year that the Poker Alliance has set up shop at CPAC. But it was striking to see in speech after speech many of the wedge issues that so preoccupied the most recent GOP  majority – Terry Schiavo, abortion, stem cells, gays, family values, religion in government – sublimated to the GOP’s laser-like focus on the economy and to see the CPAC’s attempts, as with GOProud, to widen their tent.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: conservative, cpac, family values, gay, poker, republican, Congress, Republican Party
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • deconstructiva

    Jay, thanks for this post. I read your tweets about GOProud / NOPM and your upcoming hostile envir. training. Congrats on training! …but I thought you were already getting that at CPAC and Tea Party events. Are you going to Afghanistan soon? Well, that would beat being sent to Alaska to find Trig’s birth certificate, but I digress. Is overseas coverage your next calling, are you trying new stuff, or are you getting DC cabin fever? I wish you well / stay safe on next foreign assignment, but will you remain involved in the swamp, please?
    .
    As for CPAC, were the GOProud / NOPM booth alignments arranged deliberately or by serendipity (sarahdipity)? Or was that one of those “don’t ask, don’t tell” questions? Thanks for your thoughts.
    .
    (…and yes, my world’s shortest hiatus is over but will avoid most infighting, tribes / cliques, and other troll-feeding crap, but keep up your great work, Jay.)

  • destor23

    You know standards have fallen when “not being bigots” is evidence of being inclusive and having a “big tent.”

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    It sure would be interesting to see a pro-life group, pro-gun, etc. welcomed at a DNC convention. Something tells me the “big tent” party wouldn’t be quite so open to the idea, though.

  • deconstructiva

    Well, I hope Jay got early hostile enviro. training for CPAC and Tea events instead of just being tossed in there cold. (I think Jay will make a great overseas reporter.) re: NOM / CPAC speeches, I’m also wondering if Mark Sanford spoke there about family values, such as defining marriage as a union between a man, a woman, and his soulmate.

  • destor23

    uh… see the post below. Evan Bayh’s potential replacement will be a pro-life pro-gun dem. New York has a pro-gun senator who replaced Hillary Clinton. Now Harold Ford wants the seat and he’s both pro-life and pro-gun. Don’t you worry, we Dems are all about unwanted pregnancies and getting shot.

  • stuartzechman

    Howard Dean is a pro-gun Democrat.
    .
    Markos Moulitsas is a pro-gun Democrat.
    .
    I am a pro-gun Democrat.
    .
    I’m not saying the other kind don’t exist, but there are a heck of a lot more pro-Second Amendment (pro-Bill of Rights) Democrats these days than there might have been in the 1990′s, that’s for sure.

  • deconstructiva

    …are D’s or R’s most likely to promote shotgun weddings? After Bristol / Levi’s failed courtship (now in court for visitations / support), I’m not sure.

  • kevin

    And plenty of pro-life Democrats have addressed the Democratic National Convention, too.
    .
    http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/08/abortion_foe_to.html
    .
    http://mediamatters.org/research/200406250007

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    deconstructiva,
    I believe it was a Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell situation with the booth placement but it was either random or someone got a kick out if it.

    In re: hostile environment — I won’t be permanently moving overseas, just need the training to get insurance to do stints in the Hindu Kush during congressional recesses.
    JNS

  • charlieromeobravo

    It sounds like the groups that consider themselves “truly conservative” (as in anti-gay, anti-immigration, etc…) are finding themselves at odds with more contemporary conservatives. The problem is that the Republican party still largely caters to those groups. Given that the Republican party seems to be increasingly embracing those groups, maybe it’s not the Tea Baggers that need to forming 3rd party. Maybe the mainstream conservatives that acknowledge homosexuality, minorities, and are more tolerant in general should be the ones splitting with the Republicans.

  • stuartzechman

    my world’s shortest hiatus is over
    .
    LOL

  • Cliff

    She made it through the Tea Party Convention okay, so I think she’ll be fine here.

  • stuartzechman

    Jay Newton-Small:

    just need the training to get insurance to do stints in the Hindu Kush

    ROFL
    .
    I think you also need special shots.
    .
    Oh, and a brigade or two of Special Forces in which to be embedded, too.
    .
    I hear the flora is lovely there this time of year (link to some random guy extolling the virtues of Hindu Kush flora).

  • Paul-no not that one

    Do the Pokers Players Alliance know that their most vocal supporter is…Barney Frank?

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Yup. I’m told Frank’s introducing legislation soon.
    JNS

  • afguy

    stuart,
    .
    My wife is pretty conservative but she won’t allow a gun anywhere in the house.
    .
    It has nothing to do with the NRA (pro or con). She’s just concerned with our testosterone-laden teenage boys and general lack of care around things that might hurt them (or others).

  • kevin

    Yeah, they do. I think this is just an effort to cover all the bases.
    .
    http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/poker-players-alliance-to-spend-3-million-for-lobbying-efforts-2057/
    .
    I hope Raymer wore his Fossilman glasses to CPAC.

  • charlieromeobravo

    Right, so here’s the thing:
    .
    if you were to go to the “liberal” version of CPAC you’d see similar debates amongst the various groups in attendance. You also see the same debates inside the Democratic party, hence the “lack of party unity” that gets discussed a lot.
    .
    You go to CPAC, you see these debates but when you watch the Republicans in action, there’s very little debate and the reps that stray from the script usually end up having to walk those statements back very quickly. The Republicans leave those people that aren’t the hardcore conservative white guys behind when CPAC is over. They purge the party members that reflect other points of view.
    .
    The fact that even Cheney is saying that DADT should be lifted but elected Republicans are fighting it tells you all you need to know about their long term future. They’re catering to Tea Baggers while the sane people that live in the real world are further alienated by what they stand for. Those folks might not feel like the Democratic party would be a comfortable home but it’s increasingly certainly not the Republican party…

  • afguy

    Why is it, whenever I hear the phrases “Sarah Palin” and “big tent”, I envision philosophies other than “political inclusion”?
    .
    And I suspect the some male GOPers have the same thoughts.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Politics…bedfellows.

  • shepherdwong

    Somehow, you’ll have to learn to ignore the lying, right-wing crap about the Democratic Party being liberal (it’s a relatively small club, actually).
    .
    Signed, another Democrat and gun owner.

  • stuartzechman

    afguy:
    .
    My wife (link to my wife’s twitter feed) is pretty liberal, but her father was an officer in her country’s army, and she earned some kind of sharp-shooter award for target-shooting with a rifle, when she was a kid over there.
    .
    We’ve gone paint-balling too, and she was kick-ass. We’ve talked about joining up with NYC Central Park’s gun club for more fun, but haven’t gotten around to it yet.
    .
    I’m not sure she’s “pro-gun” per se, but she’s not afraid of them.

  • afguy

    random,
    .
    Good afternoon.
    .
    See my post below about my rather conservative wife’s lack of enthusiasm around guns. Me, I grew up with one in the house but don’t feel the need to have one now. The last shotgun I had, I sold to the fiancee of a true redneck down in TN for a wedding present to her husband-to-be.
    .
    Recreational gun enthusiasts seem to know no real political boundaries. Now, the ones that virtually worship their firearms, as though Moses was “packing heat” when he came down off Mt. Sinai with the Ten Commandments, they lean more toward one party.

  • afguy

    stuart,
    .
    Paint-balling?? Now we’re talking!!! The sons can do all of that they want.

  • charlieromeobravo

    I agree.
    .
    Here’s what I would love most for our country:
    .
    Two parties full of great ideas. I would love nothing more than to go to vote for the next President and have to stand there for a few minutes because I’m thinking “Man, they both have great ideas, they both seem like they really care about the country and they both seem like they really want to help the American people and elevate our county’s place in the world.”
    .
    That will never happen when one party takes up an important initiative like health care reform and the other party seeks tries to stop it by lying about what health care reform would do, doesn’t attempt to offer a different set of plans to tackle the problem, and in fact denies that health care reform is even necessary or that the problem exists.
    .
    This zero sum for me to win you must lose way of operating needs to stop. Unfortunately that seems to be the only level the GOP wants to operate at the moment.

  • afguy

    stuart,
    .
    “Lovely bride” sounds like a neat lady.
    .
    I qualified Expert while in the AF. When we qualified in AF Basic Training, it didn’t take long to tell who the ones were who grew up around rifles. The kids from the Bronx had targets that looked like a shotgun had been fired at them. A few of us from GA, TN, and KY had targets with the centers basically chewed out of them – one big hole. The instructors didn’t bother to count the hits.
    .
    I took pride in doing that well, but I wasn’t one of the ones who, when “Dirty Harry” was released, went out and bought a .44 Mag.
    .
    Honestly, around Tucson in the desert, there wasn’t an old refrigerator or junked car that didn’t have howitzer-sized holes in it shortly after that movie.

  • kbanginmotown

    afguy: I think you mean “pup tent?” …;-)

  • grape_crush

    The GOP’s Big Tent?

    Dunno. Take a look at the exhibitor’s list:

    http://www.cpac.org/exhibitors.html

  • afguy

    kbang,
    .
    As much as I am tempted to “go there”, (oh, so verrrry tempted), I’m going to noble and mature and not respond to your oh-so-very-good comment.
    .
    Because I could see that ended up in the gutter (or lower) very, very quickly.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    Kevin,
    Nope – no Fossilman glasses.

    PNNTO:
    They’re trying to appeal to the libertarian crowd: stay out of our lives, small government.
    JNS

  • afguy

    Hey, KT and others.
    .
    It’s Friday afternoon… weekend coming up.
    .
    Meaatttt! Meaattt!!
    .
    Preferably something that sacredh can sink his “humor” teeth into.

  • kryptik1

    Certainly not a big tent for people with actual human rights concerns. To wit:

    Bob Barr gets booed at CPAC for calling waterboarding torture.

    This was from a panel called ‘Does security trump freedom?’. Guess we have our answer there. Lovely folks.

  • kevin

    Thanks for the answer, JNS.
    .
    That was probably the right move. Too many creationists in the CPAC crowd. The Fossilman glasses would just confuse them.

  • afguy

    I’ve been pleasantly surprised with Barr recently.
    .
    One of those conservatives who, at this point, seems to be consistent in his beliefs.

  • kryptik1

    afguy – Sadly, that’s exactly why he’ll have no purchase with the CPAC and teabagger crowd.

  • stuartzechman

    afguy:
    .
    “Lovely bride” sounds like a neat lady.
    .
    She’s far, far better than I deserve or can even adequately describe to you.

  • afguy

    kryptik1,
    .
    I have to respect the man. I may not agree with everything he believes, but he does defend them across all sorts of political divides and is equally outraged by GOP and Dem mis-steps as he sees them.
    .
    So, my hat’s off to him.
    .
    Armey, on the other hand, is an opportunistic, amoral snake…

  • afguy

    I know what you mean, stuart. I’ve know a few like her.
    .
    Congratulations on your “catch”. Looks like a “keeper”…
    .
    Coming from her background, I imagine she appreciates our country in ways we might not see ourselves…

  • stuartzechman

    afguy:
    .
    She’s the one that talked me into voting for the first time.
    .
    Now look at me!

  • mikew67

    Of tax-welcher extremism, Abe Lincoln would have said;
    “You can fool some of the people, ALL of the time”… ;^)
    – cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

  • allthingsinaname

    I am pro – life. I am concerned about the Health of the born and unborn. I am concerned about the life of the mother. I am concerned about the rampant use of abortion as a birth control. I am concerned of the lack health care and the lack of access to birth control. I am concerned about abstinence only sex education. I am concerned about the slander, ridicule, a young unmarried pregnant woman is subjected to. I am concerned that the male doesn’t live up to his responsibilities. I am concerned about the message that is sent across the air waves concerning sexual activity, that includes FOX television.
    .
    I am concerned about the environment in which we all live. I am concerned about the ethical treatment of prisoners. I am concerned about waging unethical, immoral, unnecessary wars. I am concerned about societies inability or refusal to acknowledge that we are in this together.

    I am concerned that your right to own a gun too often ends in the right to some else’s life ends.

  • Ivy_B

    The Borgen Project lives

  • braktalk88

    Bum-Bum-Bumda-Bada-Bum-Bum-Bada!

    Bum-Bum-Bumda-Bada-Bum-Bum-Bada!

  • stuartzechman

    LOL!

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    I didn’t say there weren’t pro-life or pro-gun Dems. Just wondering how welcome they’d be at the Dem equivalent of CPAC.
    .
    afguy-
    No guns in my home. I was raised in a no gun zone…my grandfather was killed in a hunting accident when my father was a boy and he has never gotten over it. I too qualified as “expert” in firearms in the Air Force…spent time as a sky cop. I’ve never fired a weapon since getting out of the service nearly forty years ago.
    .
    As I’ve mentioned before, I am conflicted about abortion and gun control issues. I used those examples because they seem so polarizing to the extremes of both parties.

  • allthingsinaname

    Thanks for reading the replys and, for responding. We are a mixed bag for sure but people are first. Well at least there is a sense that we are or, at least we hope we can drive it that way. It doesn’t seem to be any way to do it with the GOP.

  • deconstructiva

    …or we shouldn’t go down there?

  • afguy

    random,
    .
    Sorry to hear that. That would tend to make a house a “no gun zone”.
    .
    Right now, I’m afraid many are partisan just for the sake of partisanship. Blindly so.
    .
    Oh, my older brother was a Skycop when he went it too.

  • afguy

    See what I mean?
    .
    With THIS group, “potty brain/mouth” is just one wrong word (or a small typo) away.

  • deconstructiva

    …yes, you’re right. This could’ve easily entered a discussion of whether Sarah is a woman of good taste and who her freinds really are (those who stand behind her).

  • allthingsinaname

    I too am sorry o hear that. I thought you were quoting afguy there. Like you I left the Marine Corps 39 years ago and have not picked up a rifle or pistol since. No reason for it, just haven’t felt the need.

  • afguy

    I’ve never fired a weapon since getting out of the service nearly forty years ago.
    .
    I’ve fired – once – to sight in a friend’s hunting rifle.
    .
    I failed to put the stock firmly enough to my shoulder and the recoil kicked the scope right between my eyes, cutting a nice neat circle.
    .
    Lots of blood followed – but no real damage

  • afguy

    This is starting to remind me of the conversations we would have in the AF in the mornings – BEFORE the coffee, brain cells, and thought processes had kicked in.
    .
    EVERY word was carefully considered. If one COULD be mis-interpreted, it WAS!

  • bobcn1

    ‘If they consider it a sin, they shouldn’t do it. But don’t tell me I can’t do it.’

    Raymer’s complaint highlights the principle difference between Dems and gopers. Democrats want regulated businesses and more individual freedom. Gopers, on the other hand, tend to want to control what other people can do (unless those people happen run businesses — then they can do pretty much whatever they want).

    Raymer is going to find that being ‘pro-choice’ in a crowd of gopers isn’t likely to be a winning argument.

  • braktalk88

    Please see “Song of the Day” this Sunday. Gonna make things a little more crystal clear for the zombies who can see past their own fantasies . . .

  • sacredh

    I wasn’t very pro-gun until that comment about the Borgen Project being alive. Is it considered bad form to shoot starving people instead of feeding them?

  • kbanginmotown

    …that’s what she said!

  • sosgops

    Thats a good joke. A bigger tent for the GOP. You mean like a bigger strait jacket. These noodle heads spend all of their time making lists of what a pure virginal conservative believes or thinks. Can you believe the foolishness, yet they do it non-stop. And also pretend each time that they are doing something new and original and that no one will remember the previous list that they claimed would be the one true list of all time great conservative thoughts.. Its such a farce.

  • sosgops

    Also it is highly ironic that conversative constanty harp about getting the government off of our backs, but when they get into office do nothing but try to pass laws forcing everyone to get into same mold or line that they think is the one true way….And they aren’t even cognizant of the hypocrisy…..

  • sosgops

    Incidentally, where were the tea baggers during Bush’s economic tailspin ? under a rock ? Do they just come out and play dress up in frilly clothes when there is Democratic President ? and a Black one at that ? Its kind of odd. Seems like there is a disconnect going on. You can’t go around proclaiming your conservative bona fides if you only practice them or voice them every eight years or so….They look like hypocrites , or worse, fools…..

  • sosgops

    If conservatives are so concerned about government spending why weren’t they shocked at the trillions of dollars spent by bush and his administration looking for weapons of mass destruction ? Wheres the outrage?

  • sosgops

    lets face it …You can’t have a big tent approach when you’ve nothing but lemmings, ostriches, and dodo birds in the flock .

  • sosgops

    Their narrow mindedness limits any sort of big tent approach…Its always here, “read and memorize these ten prescribed lines to repeat over and over again when you are asked what you believe”. Its called “dogma”. Its for ditto-heads. A big-tent GOP is an oxymoron…Its a joke.

  • sosgops

    as a political columnist when you are presented with humorous ideas you should point it out. It is disingenuous to throw out words together like GOP and big tent when through out history there has been no such thing and you know it. Everyone who has a memory knows it. Its not arcane knowledge. So don’t be patronizing. There is no such thing as a GOP “Big Tent” …….Don’t be foolish….

  • sosgops

    The Republican party seems to be going in circles. Every eight years or so they come out and have a revival, declaim about their virtues and how we have to get big government off of our backs. They elect some Republicans and then they go back to sleep. They ignore their elected leaders corruption, sex scandals, their sell out to big business, and government gets bigger with a few more draconian laws issued. They ignore any real problems the people have. They are much better at propaganda and getting elected than actually doing anything while in power except to fatten their own wallets or the wallets of those who gave them contributions. Their tactics are always smear, fear, distortion, and dirty politics…..So now its time for them to start over in their cycle and to pretend that they now again have the true message. Forget that one they offered eight years ago, it was , it turns out not the real “true” message ( even though they sound very similar ). And all of those with very short memories will hopefully fall into line and chant the new mantra…

  • sosgops

    Perhaps if the conservatives actually focused upon solving some of our problems and not writing down lists of ideas that we are supposed to indoctrinate ourselves with ( the same fluff they have offered for 50 years ). That kind of drivel may appeal to the ditto-heads but it isn’t going to appeal to anyone with a mind. Its not going to lead to a “Big Tent”. Lets tackle some of our problems , don’t regurgitate pablum. And don’t give me anymore lame candidates, like bush, and palin and so on …..

  • sosgops

    Republicans in general are dogmatic, phlegmatic, reactionary. Their leaders are the ones who are best at fear-mongering and demoguery. Their followers have the no-memory property. Every eight years or so they trot out the same-ol-same-o , the new and revolutionary mush that they didn’t pay any attention to when they were in power the last time. But their lemming-like followers never fail to get in line and chant the same old slogan and doubletalk, “War is peace”, “Educators are villains”, “Environmentalists are Commies”, “compassionate conservative”, “were gonna shrink big gov (ha,ha)”, yada, yada, yada……

  • afguy

    sosgops,
    .
    It’s considered good form to at least let someone get a word in edgewise between posts.
    .
    Otherwise, it’s a monologue or stand-up comedy routine.

  • sosgops

    you are right, associating the concept of a big tent with conservatives is comedic. I guess I was just enjoying myself….but if a respected journalist actually tongue-in-cheek perhaps poses such a grotesquery, well, someone has to speak up and say the emperor has no clothes…otherwise, we are all just lemmings……

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    Actually, your rants are quite comedic. I trust you will now go on about teh superior intellect, tolerance, and overall pure goodness of the Democrats and how all that is right with the world is their doing, all that is wrong the doing of those with whom you disagree. See below:
    .
    The Democrat party seems to be going in circles. Every eight years or so they come out and have a revival, declaim about their virtues and how we have to let government help us. They elect some Democrats and then they go back to sleep. They ignore their elected leaders corruption, sex scandals, their sell out to big business, and government gets bigger with a few more draconian laws issued. They ignore any real problems the people have. They are much better at propaganda and getting elected than actually doing anything while in power except to fatten their own wallets or the wallets of those who gave them contributions. Their tactics are always smear, fear, distortion, and dirty politics…..So now they pretend they have the true message, “Hope and Change”. And all of those with very short memories will hopefully fall into line and chant the new mantra…
    .
    See, your rant is interchangeable. In case you hadn’t noticed, there is rampant self-dealing and hypocracy across the political spectrum. Democrats and Republicans alike do not have a lock on “purity”, nor do all who identify with those parties buy the BS of the more extreme elements within them. Put the strident rhetoric aside and engage in an adult conversation with those with whom you might disagree, and you might actually find common ground. Otherwise, you are peeing into the wind.

  • apr2563

    Man on dog sex advocate Rick Santorum still is “crazy after all of these years”. In his speech at CPAC, he stated his theory that military officers have been brain washed into accepting the repeal of DADT.\http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/not-a-lot-of-rap-fans-at-cpac-it-seems.php?ref=mp
    Ann Coulter is continuing with her John Edwards shtick.
    How are we supposed to take these people seriously?
    Does anyone know of a liberal gathering of the size of CPAC with as many insane speakers reported on by the traditional media?

  • http://www.facebook.com/majors.bruce?ref=profile brucemajors

    At CPAC 2008 a young Ron Paul supporter asked Ann Coulter what she thought of Ron Paul and if “true conservatives” shouldn’t be supporting his principled limited government campaign in the GOP primaries. Coulter answered that she tried not to listen to Congressman Paul because he was very smart and she was afraid he just might convince her.

    Her packed noon address to the main hall at CPAC2010 was mainly stand up comedy and very good stand up comedy. (“Everyone is deserting Obama; Michelle has even asked to see his birth certificate.” “Bill Clinton was rushed to the hospital where he told the doctors it felt like he had two interns sitting on his chest.”) But the Q&A was more serious, including questions about the near take over of CPAC by Ron Paul libertarians, who seem to be 60% or more of the under 30 crowd. Dr. Paul and his associates (Judge Andrew Napolitano, “Metdown” author Tom Woods, lawyer Bruce Fein, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, “Obamanomics” author Tim Carney) have been one of the four satellite track lectures almost every session when not in the main hall itself.

    Earnest young non-libertarian questioners, wondering what had happened, asked Coulter how the “C” in CPAC could stand for libertarian. At first she tried to placate one questioner by pointing out that Dr. Paul was pro-life. Then she had a soft attack on libertarians in answer to another beleaguered conservative, opining that she was “more libertarian than most libertarians,” but that she didn’t need to spend all her time calling for legalizing pot until we have eliminated the EPA, the Department of Education, and a list of other agencies, and until she would not be called upon to pay unemployment benefits to pot heads who lose their jobs. While she listed the agencies that would need to be abolished first, Paulistas started chanting their trademark “End the Fed,” until Ms. Coulter finally did a power sign and responded “End the Fed.” Finally yet another exhausted young traditional conservative asked her a third time about how to get rid of these growing legions of libertarians and Coulter closed with “Whenever Ron Paul says anything that isn’t about foreign policy, I totally support him.”

    From the serious to the sarcastic, from Liz Cheney to Ann Coulter, the conservative intelligentsia is facing overlapping tsunamis of both tea party populism and a Ron Paul non-interventionism. The wider tea party movement may well wash away the Obama regime and the Demwit incumbatocracy. But the second tsunami is also aimed for the future control of the GOP.

    http://teapartiers.blogspot.com

blog comments powered by Disqus