A Small Victory For the DSCC

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has not gotten a lot of good press recently. The stinging loss of Ted Kennedy’s seat to Scott Brown, the failure to recruit promising prospects such as Beau Biden and the spate of high-profile retirements from the upper chamber have all taken a toll on the group’s image. The legacy of Chuck Schumer and the 2006 Democratic groundswell was hard enough to live up to already, and a tough environment combined with a string of bad luck has Senator Bob Menendez in an unenviable position atop the organization. But Marc Ambinder has uncovered a memo that makes the DSCC look pretty smart and might have saved the Democrats a lot of grief if they had heeded its words when they were written.

The gist of the memorandum written by DSCC communications chief Eric Schultz is not so remarkable on its face: It lays out the argument that Republicans who voted against the Recovery Act can be called out if and when they take credit for stimulus dollars doled out in their districts. This line of attack has been used by many Democrats in recent days and was even the subject of a lengthy ThinkProgress dossier entitled “Stimulating Hypocrisy: 111 Lawmakers Block Recovery While Taking Credit For Its Success,” complete with photos of a few GOPers wielding smiles as big as the novelty checks in their hands.

What’s interesting about the memo is that it was written in February of 2009, just after the ARRA was signed into law. The strategy it lays out was designed to rebut attacks on the stimulus and sell Americans on the legislation’s success, before criticism or public opinion could get out of control. In case you haven’t been paying attention, the Republicans have been largely successful at attacking the Recovery Act and a huge portion of Americans don’t think it worked. If the “hypocrisy” charge is as effective as Ambinder suggests and Democrats had hammered it from the get-go, public opinion might be in very different place today.

That being said, I would disagree with Ambinder that it is too late. The arbitrary one-year anniversary may have come and gone, and Democrats have certainly squandered many opportunities to sell their signature piece of legislation of 2009 or effectively counterpunch its critics. But there’s a lot of stimulus cash still to be distributed, a lot of campaigning to be done and lot of economic growth possible in the 255 days between now and election day.

Regardless of what could be or what might have been, the memo does offer some small vindication for the folks at the DSCC. And they could use a little pat on the back right now.

Related Topics: ARRA, Bob Menendez, Democratic Party, DSCC, recovery act, Republican Party, stimulus, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • afguy

    Call out hypocrisy? That’s the extent of their advice?
    .
    How about passing good legislation and recruiting good quality candidates, not just someone who can fog a mirror, with a “D” after their name?
    .
    Jeez…

  • afguy

    We’ve got quite enough of an election strategy that is basically “Vote for Candidate X for Senator… he’s not a Republican”.
    .
    Neither is Ben Nelson. But I wouldn’t be bragging about that fact…

  • spob

    Adam, quit your cheerleading. Since the various districts’ citizens are going to have to pay for the debt incurred as a result of the “stimulus”, certainly accepting the funds is not hypocrisy. Perhaps you could have, you know, pointed out that flaw in their logic. And if I know that “stimulus” is going to pass, I am smart to get some of the cash to my district. Jeez. This is pretty obvious. It’s possible to be against the “stimulus” but even more against the “stimulus” not having money go to your district. I don’t recall a ton of Dems who opposed Bush’s tax cuts being hypocrites for accepting them.
    .
    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/82375-top-goper-releases-video-of-obama-praising-acorn
    .
    Let’s see a Swampland post on that comparing those statements to Obama’s campaign trail statements.

  • allthingsinaname

    “Since the various districts’ citizens are going to have to pay for the debt incurred as a result of the “stimulus”, certainly accepting the funds is not hypocrisy”
    .
    But where is the principle?

  • afguy

    No, spob, it’s hypocrisy to stand up and say, “The stimulus isn’t working; it’s a waste” in Washington, THEN take the money and hold a press conference in your home state and say “Look what I did. I’ve gotten you money to save jobs at company X. Isn’t this great??”
    .
    If you want to argue, “We have no choice but to accept this money, but I don’t think it’s going to do what they say it is”, that’s another thing.
    .
    Don’t try to make a virtue out of talking out of both sides of your mouth, having it both ways.

  • Cliff

    I don’t recall Democratic congress people writing letters to ask for more tax cuts:
    .

    Fact: Chaffetz may have turned down some people, but, as we pointed out last October, he also signed onto a letter with Sen. Orrin Hatch and Rep. Rob Bishop seeking $95 million in stimulus funds for the Provo River Water Users Association.

    .
    http://blogs.sltrib.com/utpolitics/index.php?p=11436&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
    .
    Rank hypocrisy.

  • afguy

    Cliff,
    .
    You know what they say about “consistency being the hobgoblin of little minds”…
    .
    Whatever problems GOPers may have, consistency isn’t one of them…

  • Cliff

    And here’s an area where the Democrats are falling down, badly:
    .

    The Republican leadership even sent House GOPers back to their districts this week with a very specific set of talking points, sent over by a source, telling them precisely what to say to constituents about those specific issues.
    .
    There’s no sign whatsoever that Congressional Dems were given anything similar, or even that Dem leaders have spent any time developing a strategy of their own. Are you hearing any concerted pushback, or any message at all, on these issues from Dems?

    .
    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/torture/congressional-dems-have-no-message-on-national-security-getting-outworked-by-gop/

  • allthingsinaname

    Baby steps are important when you are the majority.

  • Cliff

    Actually, I don’t think I’ve run across that saying before.

  • afguy

    Sorry, Cliff, my bad.
    .
    The full and correct quote is: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”
    .
    It’s from Emerson.

  • afguy

    “adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.”
    .
    NOW, it’s complete.

  • afguy

    Cliff,
    .
    Why do I have the mental image of pigs, a LOT of lipstick, and loads of air freshener?
    .
    Government of the talking point, by the talking point, and for the talking point…
    .
    God, Congress sucks right now…

  • stuartzechman

    Adam Sorensen:

    The gist of the memorandum written by DSCC communications chief Eric Schultz is not so remarkable on its face: It lays out the argument that Republicans who voted against the Recovery Act can be called out if and when they take credit for stimulus dollars doled out in their districts.

    Hmmm…what kind of thinking would act to prevent that plan of attack from going forward, and peaking just about when the summer recess happened (and Chuck Grassley started in about pulling the plug on Grandma)?

    OBAMA:
    .
    Now, we — we can — here’s what I know going forward, though. I mean, we’re talking — you know, we’re talking about the past. We can talk about this going forward.
    .
    I have looked at every idea out there in terms of accelerating job growth to match the economic growth that’s already taken place.
    .
    There may be other ideas that you guys have. I am happy to look at them and I’m happy to embrace them. I suspect I will embrace some of them. Some of them I’ve already embraced.
    .
    But the question I think we’re going to have to ask ourselves is, as we move forward, are we going to be examining each of these issues based on what’s good for the country, what the evidence tells us, or are we going to be trying to position ourselves so that come November, we’re able to say, “The other party, it’s their fault”?
    .
    If we take the latter approach, then we’re probably not going to get much agreement. If we take the former, I suspect there’s going to be a lot of overlap. All right?

    If the strategy of the DSCC was to point out each instance of the rank hypocrisy of Republicans, and the strategy of the Administration was to claim the high ground and denounce partisan tactics as illegitimate, then isn’t there an obvious problem with that scenario, Adam Sorensen?
    .
    If, on the one hand, the DSCC goes full-on at the Republicans for showing themselves to be hypocrites, and on the other, the President himself gets up on national television and condemns exactly that conduct, then isn’t the charge of hypocrisy inevitably going to come back and stick to the Democrats at least as damagingly?

    I would disagree with Ambinder that it is too late.

    Not too late?
    .
    After the President of the United States just said to the world:

    OBAMA:
    .
    And I — I would just say that we have to think about tone.
    .
    It’s not just on your side, by the way. It’s — it’s on our side as well. This is part of what’s happened in our politics, where we demonize the other side so much that when it comes to actually getting things done, it becomes tough to do.

    How can the Democrats possibly follow the advice of Eric Shultz, when this post-partisan gibberish is the message coming out of the Bully Pulpit, as it has been non-stop all year –when there actually was a message, I mean?
    .
    When you write:

    Democrats have certainly squandered many opportunities to…effectively counterpunch its critics

    , isn’t the obvious question then how they could even attempt to do that, when the nominal leader of their party is constantly positioning himself as the objective arbiter of “Washington’s” unnecessary, unpleasant conflict, and broadcasts that his own (majority) party is equally responsible for the obstruction –and therefore the country’s continued, unsolved crises?
    .
    I’m no fan of the DSCC –I won’t give them another penny– but, honestly, what are they supposed to do? …Wait until reporter after reporter asks Schumer in front of camera after camera to explain his apparent opposition to the express hopes and wishes of the President? Wait until David “Fluffy” Gregory’s producers get their hands on material that would make Saint Russert proud of his successor? Then maybe tone it down a bit…while health care negotiations drag themselves into the new year and a bipartisan “summit”?
    .
    Really?
    .
    What am I missing, Adam Sorensen?

  • allthingsinaname

    In case you missed it here is some of the payouts for TX school distrricts. A non Stimulus State. Well I live here and allthough my kids are grown I apprciate it.

    District Amount Enrollment
    Houston $158,646,000 — 198,769
    Aldine $30,118,000 — 59,822
    Cypress-Fairbanks $22,068,000 — 96,546
    Alief $25,751,000 — 45,057
    Pasadena $23,517,000 — 50,603
    Fort Bend $17,597,000 — 67,780
    Spring Branch $14,779,000 — 31,955
    Conroe $13,536,000 — 46,302
    Klein $11,640,000 — 42,801
    Katy $10,523,000 — 53,762
    North Forest $9,911,000 — 8,369
    Spring $9,744,000 — 33,121
    Clear Creek $8,954,000 — 36,153
    Galena Park $8,578,000 — 21,041
    Goose Creek $7,718,000 — 20,235
    Humble $7,256,000 — 32,804
    Lamar Consolidated $6,210,000 — 21,794
    Galveston $4,426,000 — 7,891
    Alvin $4,135,000 — 15,196
    Deer Park $3,375,000 — 12,314
    Pearland $2,812,000 — 17,021
    Channelview $2,647,000 — 8,409
    Tomball $2,239,000 — 9,366
    La Porte $2,238,000 — 7,905
    Sheldon $1,974,000 — 5,774
    Texas City $1,828,000 — 5,752
    Friendswood $1,018,000 — 5,853

    Source: House Committee on Education and Labor, Texas Education Agency

  • Cliff

    No need for apologies, I just apparently have very little knowledge of Emerson.

  • Cliff

    I’m not surprised that the Republicans are doing that, it’s a tactic they’ve used since at least Karl Rove popped up.
    .
    I’m infuriated that the Democrats can’t bust out these news stories about all these terrorists and Taliban leaders getting killed or captured, and refute the attacks.
    .
    The ammunition is there, they just won’t use it.

  • afguy

    I guess my feeling is that a good legislative agenda and accomplishments would be a great talking point.
    .
    But they really do need to try and defend themselves. I just wish they weren’t ALWAYS playing defense.

  • cfukara

    ” .. public opinion might be in very different place today. ..”
    Once wrong perceptions have been planted and allowed to set, it becomes a lot more difficult to correct them. Take for instance the perception instill in us during our impressionable childhood that, eh, other races are no good ..

    ” .. But there’s a lot of stimulus cash still to be distributed, ..”
    For as long as the Repugs do not want to be associated with stimulus package, the DEMs should make a public spectacle of it: A democrat should tag along for the photo op whenever a project wins funding AND whenever a project that was funded by the program is commissioned. Of course, the human stories of success thereafter must be ‘sold’ to the people.

    Surely the rightists of the party of Nyet! wouldn’t mind.
    [Never mind: The DEMs wouldn't conceive and vigorously execute any program designed to win the hearts and minds of the American people, would they?]
    ..
    ” .. a lot of campaigning to be done and lot of economic growth possible ..”
    The charge right now is that the DEMs cannot focus their message and that they are incapable of mounting an effective PR campaign. They seem to think that good works and brilliance will just sell themselves to the Americans (who are known trust charlatans like Limbaugh and Beck and get their news from trashy tabloids like FOX ‘News’ network.)

    Perhaps someone told Biden and the DEMs that “faint heart did win the fair maiden.” .. [It must have been a very sly Republican or Chaibag.]

  • sacredh

    I’m very familiar with Emerson. I especially liked his collaborations with Lake and Palmer.

  • afguy

    sacredh!
    .
    Touche!
    .
    BTW, we needed you last night. Had a Tea Party guest in one of the threads. It was hilarious!
    .
    After a while, he got PO’d and left. Can’t imagine what we might have said to chase him off…

  • afguy

    They seem to think that good works and brilliance will just sell themselves to the Americans…
    .
    cfukara: it MIGHT, if we were actually seeing some, you know, EXAMPLES of good works and brilliance.
    .
    What I’m seeing is blinding incompetence and venality. Not very inspiring.

  • cfukara

    Good case: #7 above.
    I suspect that most parents in the school district do not know about it.
    And the DEMS, in particular those in TX, wouldn’t tout the good news: They are merely sitting on it. (Are they hens?) Or do they think that most Americans do access the government sites?
    Can DEMs count on ‘enough’ friendly newsapapers, popular talk show hosts, bloggers, grassroots organizers, etc who tout these successes? What field assistance is available from the DNC and this DSCC?

  • sacredh

    afguy: My power went off yesterday morning and didn’t come back on until early this morning. I read the thread when I woke up this afternnon. Bruce did come back and I exchanged some pleasantries with him. I hope he sticks around. He’s like fresh meat in a federal prison.

  • cfukara

    ” .. I just wish they weren’t ALWAYS playing defense. ..”
    Indeed that is the play that is left when one doesn’t, or is unwilling to, take the fight to a feisty adversary.

    In such a case, unfortunately, the adversary dictates (to his advantage) what kind of fight it is going to be. In this case, the GOPs determine the tone, agenda and the talking points to which the DEMs have got to respond.
    [Do you remember last summer's town hall meetings - after the listless, rudderless DEMs failed to pass the bill!]

    Yet DEMs are not without options for an effective, offensive scotched-earth propaganda war – conventional or otherwise .. Missing? Leadership.

    For as long as they are on the defensive, they cannot develope and execute a winning offensive strategy. And the adversary knows that.

  • afguy

    sacredh,
    .
    Curiosity got the best of me and, against my better judgement, I went back and read what you said to Bruce.
    .
    D@mn! My back was already killing me, NOW it’s my sides! Sometime about midnight, MAYBE I’ll stop laughing. That whole thread should go into the Swampland Hall of Fame.
    .
    Bruce is definitely a “keeper”. Unlike some of the obvious trolls, I think stuart’s right – he believes what he is writing, which makes him unique. I hope he does come back – but he does need to step up his game.
    .
    I’d pay real money to watch you two spar. It was classic!

  • sacredh

    afguy: I don’t know if he thought that he could waltz in here and dazzle us with his logic or what. If he had even bothered to read some of the previous threads he should have known that this crowd is a little on the rowdy side. His first post was great though. It was a “1000 Words” without a photo. The stuff about him having to remind himself about Liz not being a lesbian was comedic genius. I’m very disappointed about missing the action. It would have been fun.

  • afguy

    Well, I TRIED to uphold the tradition but the Master’s touch was surely needed.
    .
    At times, he sounded like Rusty with a new thesaurus. But the sputtering was pure gold – so many insults, so little time.
    .
    I wondered if he had been assigned the Swampland as his posting target and just failed to realize what he had gotten himself into.

  • cfukara

    Take another example of DEM’s incompetent PR management:

    The GOPs want Obama to fail.
    They have said so.
    Yet we know that Obama has failed if the USA fails – that is, poor governance takes its toll because critical positions in government are not filled due to the Senate’s obstructionism, jobs are not created, the economy remains sluggish or – and according to wildest best dreams of the the GOPs – the economy dives into the deepest depths of an epic depression etc..

    The GOPs obstructionism in the Senate is intended to create the conditions/gridlock that can lead to such a result.

    The propaganda battle must then be taken to them:

    Do Republicans want USA to fail?

    [Hopefully if they are not allowed the room to wiggle out of it, they will answer with a 'NO'. Then a few other questions will follow. Better still, we need to see some good psyops banners spring up.]

  • sacredh

    I think you folks did just fine. I would have probably taken it into the gutter and chased him away. I did wonder if he got here via a link or just stumbled onto the site. He might not have been a troll, but that’s just splitting hairs. Talking about Liz’s non-lesbianism and his attempt to redeem himself with the whole list of f**kable republican women had me rolling. My first thought was that the guy spends a lot of time in the gym but has never exercised. I wanted to ask him if Liz chewed up the scenery with her speech or just munched all of the carpet in the room.

  • FlownOver

    Hear, hear! The latest Indiana Republicrat at least saves me the trouble of even opening any mail from the DSCC. I refuse to retreat behind the lame “Well, he votes wrong, but he’s a Democrat.”

  • kathy

    cfukara: re your comment: Once wrong perceptions have been planted and allowed to set, it becomes a lot more difficult to correct them

    I remember hearing on NPR in the fall of 2008 about a study in which conservatives and liberals were shown that something they thought was true was false. The liberals said, in effect, “isn’t that interesting,” and changed their view of the truth. The conservatives dug their heels in and clung more fervently to the wrong “facts.”

    For a while I could bring up the reference on google, but was looking for it just this week and can’t find it. Would love to know more about that study.

  • kevin

    I just went back to that thread. Wow. I can’t believe he actually got crazier.

  • rustyreturns

    So much talk about “Republicans want Obama to fail”. When in fact it is merely Obama’s own fault that his Administration is in complete failure.
    .
    People tend to look at specific Administration’s agendas, and their policies. They then make up their minds if this is the direction they believe this country should be taken in. Obama has proven time and time again that he says one thing, but does something completely opposite.
    .
    When will you loons ever figure that out?

  • cfukara

    Rusty, do you want USA to fail?
    [A "Yes" or "No" answer will suffice.]

  • afguy

    Ok, I think I’ve got it!
    .
    Just went back and did my research over past threads and this is my conclusion:
    .
    brucemajors = Maureen Dowd = Rusty + 1 new Thesaurus
    .
    Anyone see any flaws in my logic?

blog comments powered by Disqus