Gibbs: President Obama “Would Love” To Appear On Daily Show, But Not Colbert Report

On Tuesday afternoon, I caught up with White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs in his office, and the conversation turned to President Obama’s decision last year to appear on both The Tonight Show with Jay Leno and The Late Show with David Letterman. Gibbs was insistent:

I actually, truth be told, was shocked that basically [David] Axelrod and I were the first two people in the history of the republic to decide to put the President of the United States on Leno and Letterman. It was two of the easiest decisions that we had to make. Tons of people are watching it, and different types of people.

So I asked the natural follow up, “Do you want to do the Daily Show?” Gibbs did not hesitate.

“I think the President would love to, just maybe not Colbert.” He went on to explain:“I have yet to see a politician best Stephen Colbert in an interview on his show,” Gibbs said, laughing. “I mean, he’s really, really good.”

So there you have it. My role as matchmaker is now complete. Jon Stewart, you should make a phone call. Gibbs is on the record. The President of the United States wants to do your show.

As for Stephen Colbert, tough luck. But I wonder, Stephen, are you just going to sit there and take that sort of treatment from the commander in chief? If he can’t face you, how prepared is he to handle, among other things, the international hug-a-horrible cute bear threat?

UPDATE: Greg Sargent tracks down a Comedy Central spokesman who says Obama is welcome to either show “anytime he wants.” Still no comment from Colbert regarding Obama bear readiness.

Related Topics: colbert report, daily show, David Letterman, jay leno, jon stewart, robert gibbs, Barack Obama
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • stuartzechman

    Michael Scherer:
    .
    Disregarding whatever else may have taken place in that interview (which I have not yet read), this is great stuff.
    .
    But I’m getting this odd, inchoate sensation that there’s a campaign of some kind starting up…

  • cfukara

    Yeah, I get that odd something sensation too!

  • bruingirl2001

    Obama was on the Daily Show I think during the campaign. It was an interview via satellite from what I remember. I wonder how he’d do on Colbert? I imagine he could hold his own.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Shows??? With the mess going on.. I dunno if appearing on any show would not be more political rubbish for the Presidents opponents to use in their ongoing smear campaign against him.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2010/02/15/stalking-criminality-the-law-and-women/

  • nflfoghorn

    Colbert is a mock-up of the right; Stewart is much more to-the-point. (Anybody seen Kilborn lately?)

  • sechandler912

    You know, history seems to indicate that the people do not want a leader who pals around… There is a loveliness to dignity and respect. It’s kinda the problem with parents today. They’re trying too hard to be kids’ friends and not trying hard enough to be their guides, boundary setters and loving examples… What’s up with that? I urge the president to lead with dignity — there’s far too little of that in our society as it is. We could use it from him, from our parents, other leaders, teachers, etc. Never erected a statue to the guy who “pals around” with everyone. Hard to take them seriously… Might check with his wife — she seems to be a great example of a parent. I’m just saying…

  • allthingsinaname

    I came to swampland because the blogging was great compared to other sites. Now I find that you have confused quantity with quality.
    .
    No thanks; I can get I can get this kind of trivia at ABC.

  • square1

    Gibbs strikes me as a clown with a surprising lack of message discipline.

  • sacredh

    What’s next? People from his cabinet on “Dancing with the Czars”?

  • shepherdwong

    That’s right. It’s really tough to “best” a guy doing (really funny) parody, while you’re playing it straight.

  • nflfoghorn

    Here’s one thing the New Guy missed: SP’s righteous indignation over “Family Guy.”

  • nflfoghorn

    I think BO could handle it either way though.

  • tjoyce994

    Actually, Stewart does a better job of interviewing politicians than most “real” journalist. He asks the tough questions, he’s polite, but he forces an answer. Going on Stewart’s show would be smart.

  • hotbbq

    I’d be more inclined to agree with you if The Daily Show wasn’t so much better at actually pointing out the hypocrisy and bull$h1t we call politicians.

  • tjoyce994

    Normally, I would agree with you. But we have never had a president that has been branded a socialist/communist, or where so many people seriously question his patriotism. If these idiots are getting their news from less than balanced outlets, he can’t reach them there. A comedy show brings in a different audience. Let them see that he doesn’t have horns and a tail.
    -
    And he doesn’t have to be undignified. The Gingrich interview was very serious and dignified. Stewart called Gingrich on his duplicity though.

  • http://forgottenlord.livejournal.com forgottenlord

    Sorta. When Stewart has a bone to pick, he’s absolutely on fire with his interviews. While he’s been getting a tad better lately, he’s been generally softer and weaker on interviews where its someone he supports.

  • lupercal5

    matter of fact, he was on colbert as well. that’s when he orders Gen. Odierno to shave Colbert’s head.

  • kbanginmotown

    sacredh: FTW! (Again!) :-D

  • pbmama

    i think an appearance on either show would really just be preaching to the choir. it’s not like the folks who watch Fox by day turn to Comedy Central at night…

  • hotbbq

    While he’s been getting a tad better lately, he’s been generally softer and weaker on interviews where its someone he supports.

    This is true.

  • nflfoghorn

    Cripes, I thought they were one in the same :)

  • Ivy_B

    According to Greg Sargent, Comedy Central says he has an open invitation. Last did both Stewart and Colbert when he was a candidate.

    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/comedy-central-so-obama-wants-to-do-jon-stewart-then-lets-do-it/

  • Ivy_B

    Sorry MS, didn’t see your update. One of Greg’s commenters suggested it would be great for Obama to go on Stewart the day of the HCR debate and then on Colbert for the rebuttal!

  • apr2563

    Actually, I find Stewart’s interviews to be much more dignified than say any on MTP, mainly because the questioners are such buffoons on the “serious” shows. If he is interviewing an author, you can tell by the back and forth that he has actually read the book. With political interviews, he knows the issues and asks follow through questions (Betsy McCoy). When he does make a mistake (letting Gingrich claim the shoebomber was American), he takes responsibility and acknowledges his error. He isn’t playing gotcha but really wants truth and information. And, as an added attraction, his show makes you laugh a lot.
    Colbert is different. His show is brilliant satire. Although, he brings truth to power in his own way, he is a minefield for any guest. Remember when he entertained at the White House Correspondence Dinner for Bush and the press sat like deer caught in the headlights? Oh, that was joyous.

  • vnlathndr775

    I bought some oranges from Kilborn by the freeway the other day.

  • algonquinjcalhoun

    The Comedy Channel is the perfect place for Borat Obama. Please have make-up standing by to wipe the brown off of Stewart’s nose when this travesty is over.

  • shepherdwong

    I believe you meant to say “America’s most trusted newscaster”.
    .
    http://www.timepolls.com/hppolls/archive/poll_results_417.html

  • FlownOver

    Shep:

    What can you expect from somebody whose cultural sensibilities are drawn from Amos ‘n’ Andy?

    As opposed to… oh, say… What’s Up, Tiger Lily?”

  • shepherdwong

    Yeah, probably more Campbell’s Soup than secret egg salad recipe.

  • vernonbc

    Actually, Obama was on Colbert during the campaign too. He was on the night that John Edwards was on and I believe Hillary made a brief appearance as well. I think Obama would do well in a sit down one-on-one with Stephen. Obama’s very smart and quick on his feet and could probably manage it.

  • spotweld

    I think NBC has a prime time slot open around 10p…

  • kevin

    I can’t stand Palin, but that Family Guy dig was way over the line. It wasn’t even funny.
    .
    Anyway, there’s zero need to bring her son into it, when Palin herself offers up so much potential for jokes.

blog comments powered by Disqus