Palin’s Speech

The Grand Ole Opry may have been next door but Sarah Palin preached to the choir on Saturday at the National Tea Party Convention and brought down the house. The two-day event, held at the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Hotel, had been a relatively placid affair – Tea Partiers learned how to social network and reach out to young conservatives – until Palin’s speech.

Palin received numerous standing ovations and underlined her support of the movement– this is the first of at least three Tea Party events she’ll be attending, including a March rally against Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada and a one-year Tea Party anniversary event in April – by hitting a number of Tea Party slogans. ““So how’s that ‘hope’ and ‘change’ working out for you?” read a t-shirt for sale in the lobby. “Now a year later, I gotta ask their supporters: how’s that hope-y and change-y thing workin’ out for ya?” Palin asked to roars of approval from the 1,100-person crowd – 600 convention goers who paid $549 for the access to the full schedule, plus another 500 who paid $349 for the lobster & steak dinner.

Palin didn’t miss an opportunity to round on President Obama for what she called his failures on the national security and economic fronts. She slammed Obama for his handling of the underwear bomber. “The events surround the Christmas day plot reflect the kind of thinking that led to 9/11,” she said, adding that the Clinton Administration hadn’t taken the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole seriously enough. “That threat was treated like an international crime spree, not an act of war… To win that war, we need a commander in chief, not a professor of law.”

On the economy, Palin slammed Obama for not doing enough to deal with the fiscal crisis while, at the same time, spending far too much. “Washington has replaced private irresponsibility with public irresponsibility,” she said. “They’ve bailed out banks, mortgage companies, financial institutions, auto makers. And, if they have their way, health care and student loans… Where’re the consequences of getting us into the worse situation since the great depression?”

“The list of broken promises is long,” Palin continued. “It’s easy to understand why Americans are shaking their heads when Washington has broken their trust with the American people. We’re drowning in national debt and many of us have had enough,” she said to a standing ovation.

The speech was closely watched for signs of Palin’s political future. In many ways the convention was a coming out with the national media both for the movement and for Palin — this was the first televised, U.S. public speech she’s given since resigning as governor. And there has been much speculation that the  2008 Republican vice presidential nominee might run for president in 2012. Palin submitted to a brief question and answer session with conference organizer Judson Phillips before leaving just over 90 minutes after she arrived. One of the questions particularly delighted the audience. “I can think of two words that scare liberals: President Palin,” Phillips said, inciting a standing ovation and chants of “Run, Sarah run.” “What is the Palin plan?”

Palin said she’d like first to tackle energy issues – expanding oil and gas drilling across the U.S. and offshore, a signature issue of hers both as governor and vice presidential nominee. She also said she’d like to lay out a “real” green jobs plan, as opposed to the one proposed by Obama. Secondly, she pledged deep spending cuts and promised to tackle the deficit. And third, she said she’d make no illusions of phony bipartisanship. “I would not be making the promises of bipartisanship if the promises can’t be fulfilled,” she said. “Don’t fake it, don’t pretend that you want to work with the other party on [health care] because distrust is building and that makes us distrust all the decisions coming out of Washington and it makes us a less secure nation,” she said to yet another standing ovation.

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Barack Obama, national tea party convention, Sarah Palin, speech, 2012 Election, Barack Obama, Budgets, Congress, Democratic Party, Economy, Harry Reid, Health Care, Nancy Pelosi, Republican Party, Senate, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • gysgt213

    The speech was closely watched for signs of Palin’s political future.
    .
    “Neal Boortz on MSNBC notes that Sarah Palin is “not going to be the Republican nominee for President of the United States,” and that if she is, it will mean “another four years of Barack Obama.”
    .
    On another note the answers in the question and answer had a few gems.
    .
    “The best of America can be found in places where people are brave enough to stand up and speak up.”
    .
    “It’s time for tough actions like sanctions on Iran.”

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    My favorite was on Track: My son hasn’t watched C-Span a day in his young life!

  • gysgt213

    I did learn one thing and this came at the point she referred to Alaska as a “beacon of hope” for the oppressed.

  • kathy

    gack

  • Matt

    I bet independent voters love to hear her bash bipartisanship and then make vague promises about “real green jobs” – whatever those are…

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • virginiagentleman

    Jay, two points:
    1) I think you need to add something these sentences:
    “Palin didn’t miss an opportunity to round on President Obama for his failures on the national security and economic fronts. She slammed Obama for his handling of the underwear bomber.”

    Since when have we decided that the underwear bomber is a “failure” for Obama on the national security front?

    2) Did Palin really have words written on her hand as a cheat sheet? I’ve seen the Internet videos but didn’t watch the speech live. If true, what little credibility she was building with the speech just melted away, unlike the snow piled up outside my house.

  • rustyreturns

    Except for the bobble, or gaffe, as gysgt points out about Alaska, which I think should have been the United States, Palin delivered exactly what the Tea Party folks stand for spot on.
    .
    She hit on Obama for all of his fake and frivilous policies and programs right in the heart. She has exposed him for what he is, a fraud. A teleprompter reading imbecile.
    .
    Hopefully we shall see more exposure of Obama and his failed policies and programs. When people do understand them, he will be rejected outright.

  • kevin

    “So how’s that ‘hope’ and ‘change’ working out for you?”
    .
    I know that the Tea Baggers think they’re being incredibly clever with this slogan, that they’re somehow tweaking Obama voters who surely regret their vote now, but let me say this to them — the hope and change are working out great, thanks.
    .
    On the economy, we’ve had the change I hoped for — a complete turnaround of the downward spiral Bush and the Republicans put us in, with recovery clearly on the way.
    .
    On the courts, instead of conservative judicial activists who somehow think corporations deserve all the free speech rights of humans, we’ve gotten a good Supreme Court Justice in Sonia Sotomayor to stop the conservative tide.
    .
    On the government, instead of Republicans who turned a blind eye to regulation and let me wonder just what was going to be the new thing that kills us all — contaminated spinach? uninspected bridges? lead toys? — I know that what I and my family buy is safe again.
    .
    On national security, instead of posturing that alienates our allies and doesn’t catch terrorists, I have a government that’s respected in the world and killing the bad guys at twice the rate of the previous administration.
    .
    So, yeah, Caribou Barbie, that hope and change is working out just great for me, thanks. And the fact that the Tea Baggers are wetting themselves in fear over all that change is just one more thing I hoped I’d see.

  • lizziefromcanada
  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    1. Duly noted and I updated to reflect that it was Palin’s accusation that Obama dropped the ball — not that he actually did.

    2. I personally didn’t see this as the press were at the back of a cavernous room and folks at home got a better view than we did. But it would seem so:
    http://www.oliverwillis.com/2010/02/06/sarah-palin-caught-reading-her-speech-off-her-hand/

  • kevin

    She had to rely on crib notes, even though all the questions were “pre-screened, pre-selected,” and even then, her answers were rambling nonsense.

  • kevin

    I like the comment over at Kos: “You don’t go through five colleges without picking up some tricks.”

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small
  • kevin

    She’s not going to run? Damn. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. She’s not even favored in Alaska anymore.
    .
    I’d love to see her run just for the comedy value, but the fact that she’d split the GOP in two would be even better. A man can dream, can’t he?

  • Bill Schmalfeldt

    Rusty…

    Dear, Dear Rusty…

    Do you realize now, at this late hour, how PATHETIC your comment seems in the face of the fact that your idol, Caribou Barbie, had to rely on CRIB NOTES SCRIBBLED ON THE PALM OF HER HAND to get through a pre-screened, pre-approved list of softball questions from a fawning admirer?

    And you would call OBAMA an imbecile?

    Oh, Rusty… how sad and alone you must feel this morning.

  • kevin

    This morning, and every morning.

  • Ike Jakson

    She is drawing the crowds, Folks. And as you all know those in ‘hem crowds will vote.

  • spob

    The shot at the Clinton Administration for the USS Cole bombing was unfair. Although the decision to allow a Navy ship to go into Yemen was ridiculous (IIRC, the State Dept wanted it), but the reality is that it was very close to the end of Clinton’s term, and he could have quite reasonably decided that he didn’t want to saddle his successor with the fallout from retaliation.
    .
    Clinton certainly deserves some blame for the rise of al-Qaeda on his watch, and his defense, that he shot a couple of cruise missiles to hit bin Laden, is laughable, but the bottom line is that there probably wasn’t the political will in America for a post-9/11 type offensive against al-Qaeda. He could have done it, a la the Bush surge, which was in the teeth of a lot of opposition, but that’s hard, and would have been fraught with difficulty.

  • charlieromeobravo

    Yeah, I thought she was ignorable too but then someone pointed out that she killed the end of life counseling provision in the health care reform bill simply by issuing a crazy missive from Facebook. And that was after she was on the record as governor of Alaska supporting the same measure in her state. She mobilizes people. It’s the sad truth. They love her, listen to her, and accept everything she says at face value. She could tell them the sky was green while standing outdoors and they’d believe it. Because of that, we ignore her at our our own peril.

  • charlieromeobravo

    “He could have done it, a la the Bush surge, which was in the teeth of a lot of opposition, but that’s hard, and would have been fraught with difficulty.”

    He probably could have done more but at least you can argue that he did something. Bush didn’t do a damn thing until AFTER 9/11 occurred. HE received a report titled “Osama Bin Laden determined to strike in US” and then said “OK you’ve covered your ass” after it was presented. Does that sound like vigilance? AT least you can say that Clinton cared PRIOR to disaster waking him up.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    Obama drew crowds. She drew a smaller audience than a HS football game in Tennessee.

    She does generate enthusiasm among her supporters though.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    JNS-

    So TIME will be at the much larger, much more influential Netroots Nation conference, right? Actual elected officials will be there, as will some key influencers in the party and on the progressive wing.

    200 reporters would be adequate, matching the coverage provided to this fringe group, a conference no elected official would attend and that had serious questions raised about ethical issues.

  • http://www.inworldstudios.com jayackroyd

    Rusty

    I have yet to hear a coherent statement of what they stand for.Can you provide one?

  • jymallyn

    I find the ignorance and guile of Sarah Palin to be a source of joy.

    We forget that the campaign of Ross Perot (and the “anti-government spending” fools who supported him) was the single biggest factor in the loss of President George HW Bush to womanizer/alcoholic Bill Clinton. The fools failed to realize that the wealth of Perot was because his success at getting government contracts.

    The good news for President Obama is that with Palin’s candidacy for President with the DouchBag Party (the combined Conservanuts, TeaBaggers, Birthers, Beckaholics, and Limbergers) should guarantee Obama’s re-election.

    Thank you Sarah. May you continue to babble.

  • formerlyjames

    The opening references to Scott Brown are strange. From what little I do know of him, these people couldn’t have secured his attendance at this pathetic demonstration if they held a gun on him. What they don’t know is that he is more of an old school conservative as opposed to their pop culture religious kind.

  • formerlyjames

    Come to think of it, I remember now that they even lost the participation of certified nutcase Michele Bachmann who withdrew when the fees paid the speakers came up. Didn’t want to appear mercenary, you see, let alone that of a cheap woman paid for services rendered. Sarah appears to have had no such qualms.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Clinton cared about covering his ass, and getting a piece of ass. Throughout his admimistration, his downright disdain for the military was quite evident. He’s the one who had UBL in his sights on numerous occaisions, and indeed even had him in custody, and let him go free. He has the blood of thousands of innocent civilians on his hands, plain and simple. To even mention his name in the same sentence as Bush when discussing national security is the joke of the century. Get that straight.
    .
    Did Sarah have a cribsheet, or notes written on her hand? Perhaps she did, and my answer to that is who cares? We have a hell of a speaker in the whitehouse now, so what? He is proving with every move to be the most destructive president this nation has never known, and given the ineptitude of the liberal prez’s that have gone before him that’s quite a feat.
    .
    JNS, you went to this convention for one reason only. To tear down Sarah and the tea party. You’re a wet behind the ears, little miss priss who wouldn’t know a real genuine American if you fell over one. You’re denegration of the Tea Partiers, especially the elderly, may win you a few points and laughs from the mindless liberal numbskulls who follow you and sniff your ass on this rag of a blog, but in the end all you accomplish is to thrust the Tea Party farther into the limelight, thus causing the movement to swell. For that we thank you, but don’t expect any roses or cookies. You’re job is to further the doctrine of liberalism, but you’re achieving the opposite. America has finally awoken thanks to you and your fellow “journalists” and all I can say is CARRY ON!

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    One question Kevin: where’s the jobs. No one gives an aviated intercourse about any thing you posted. They want jobs, and until they reappear, all the crap you just wrote is the mere scribblings of a doting fool.

  • deconstructiva

    $349 for steak and lobster? I hope Todd caught the lobster with his bare hands and Sarah shot and butchered the cow.

  • spob

    The issue is not what corporations deserve, but what the First Amendment says.

  • ohiolib

    To even mention his name in the same sentence as Bush when discussing national security is the joke of the century
    -
    Absolutely. Bush had 3000 American civilians die on his watch-at least partially because of CYA. Or is ‘Blame Clinton/the liberals/the courts/the media/the boogeyman of the day the only option a morally bankrupt zealot can come up with? Pretty sad.
    -
    Did Sarah have a cribsheet, or notes written on her hand? Perhaps she did, and my answer to that is who cares
    -
    well, if Obama’s “teleprompter” is fair game, I don’t see why Sarah’s low-tech equivilent isn’t. Or maybe you’d admit that both are pretty inconsequential molehills? Nah, you’ll just blame that on Clinton too.

  • kevin

    One question Kevin: where’s the jobs.
    .
    Uh, in the link I provided. It shows pretty clearly that the stimulus stopped the hemorrhaging of job losses under Bush.
    .
    The nonpartisan CBO has determined that the stimulus saved between 600,000 and 1,600,000 jobs. Here’s a report from the Wall Street Journal:
    .
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125964003843970851.html
    .
    And yes, the stimulus worked. Even the economists at the arch-conservative American Enterprise Institute have admitted that it boosted the economy by 4%.
    .
    http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/aei-says-stimulus-boosted-economy-4

  • kevin

    The issue is not what corporations deserve, but what the First Amendment says.
    .
    I must have missed the part in the first amendment where it talked about corporations having unlimited rights to campaign expenditures.
    .
    Conservatives keep insisting they believe in “original intent” and that they never “interpret” the constitution, but there’s no clearer evidence that they do than the decisions treating corporations as human beings. They’re not.

  • kevin

    Marsha Blackburn backed out too.

  • mjwilstein

    You can watch the video of Palin reading off of her hand at the Tea Party convention here:
    http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2010/02/sarah-palin-reads-crib-notes-from-her.html

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Rusty~
    .
    Several days ago you misrepresented my political philosophy on the “Bring on the Tea” thread. I replied in length to your false characterization. Care to respond?

  • doctor1248

    Palin is the best asset on Obama’s team. If her grammar is as good as her leadership ability, I pray that she does run!

    By the way, what does:
    “It would be absurd to not consider what it is that I can potentially do to help our country.” mean? Somebody help me! I can’t unwind it!

    I hope that Alaska recovers from Palin’s leadership (or lack thereof). I will give her this, Palin is sexy. Perhaps she should consider hosting a talk show on The Comedy Channel, with Georgie and McCain as her first guests!

    During the campaign, McCain talked about nothing except the past and how he was “a maverick”. Palin kept insisting on forgetting the past and the need for stable leadership. It would have been a nice change if Palin and McCain shared the same writer once in awhile.

    Oops, I was sooooo wrong! Palin is married to her writer, and McCain is too much of a loose cannon to need one, except maybe Limbaugh. By the way Mr. Limbaugh, how is that Oxycodone thing working out?

  • oikkdi

    If Ms. Palin is so passionate and cares for the Tea Party, Why not give the speech for FREE? NOT $100,000 – was it?
    It is all about the CASH.

  • beng55

    Hello, Exiled_At_Home
    Just seen your name and decided to write a short note
    concerning our lively discussion a couple of months ago. You left me the last word which I don’t delude myself to interpret as your acceptance of defeat in the debate. Anyway, without meaning to open the topic, I use this occasion to recommend you a book that I’ve just finished reading recently. It is “The Dream Palace of the Arabs” by Fouad Ajami. Look it up in the Amazon.
    Best wishes.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Hello, Beng~
    You are most correct that I do not cede you the victory in that debate. Valid points were most assuredly made on both our parts, yet I stand by my original conclusions.
    ~
    With that said, I am willing to examine the topic with an open mind, as I always have. You may be surprised to know that my views in regard to the Middle East, and most specifically the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, have radically reversed over the years. I am today quite opposite from what I was a mere 5 or 6 years ago. I am certainly not static in my reasoning. I will indulge your reading recommendation, though I must admit, I will be taking this exploration of Arab culture with a grain of salt as it was written by a Persian. I would ask that you, in return, take the time to read one or all of the follow:
    ~The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
    ~Fateful Triangle by Noam Chomsky
    ~One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse by Ali Abunimah
    ~Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid by Jimmy Carter
    ~~
    Cheers!

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Thanks, Rusty, for your clarification, albeit a bit vague. I’ve responded again, if you’re up for some more discussion on that thread…

  • oregonmagoo

    When she says “it’s not about the money”…..hummm
    And, on national security, “We win, they lose” = “you’re either with us or against us”, sounds familiar. WAY to familiar. My take on her speech, sensationally VAGUE.

  • truckerguy01

    Does it really matter? Republican or Democrat they’re all crooked. All ANY of them ever do is take,take,take. When the working people need something the answere is always no. They all extort,threaten,and abuse the working class. Ask for mercy on back taxes and see what they tell you. These politicians take from our garden and give to those who have not helped tend to it. As a truck driver you would not believe the permits,fuel,taxes,D.O.T.numbers,licening fees,etc..etc..and thats just to get started. They (politicians) have kicked us out of our own kitchen table and have helped themselves to our feast. What crumbs fall on the floor we get. And its not just truckers they do this to. Its every single american worker in this country. Look at all the GM workers. Obama and his 3 ring circus he calls an administration can bail out crooked companies but not these workers? The government owns GM now. Why did they not save the workers and get them bailed out? Because they want all of them to come running saying “we need health care”. Thats the joke on the road..GM…Government Motors. They all take,steal,rob,and extort from their own people to enforce their own will. ALL of them.

  • apr2563

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/2/8/835007/-Teaparty.org-founded-in-2004-
    Jay, maybe the original tea partier. Wish somebody would trace from this bigot forward the evolution of the “movement’.

  • disstm

    Dumb question:

    If the tea party is for the idea of a non-central figure to lead, and it’s made up of an entire group of like-minded individuals; if they win the next election, how does that work with our form of government? What are they all going to sleep – the White House is only so big.

    P.S. I hope they didn’t drive down the big-government US highways to get to the convention; but rather took to the municipal side roads.

  • notfooledbydistractions

    Palin’s just singin’ to the choir – outside the church of brainless praddle, she doesn’t stand a chance at national office. As an entertainment tonight hostess yes, but when you have to crib notes on the same old talking points you’ve got problems. What’s wrong…was her brain full?

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Oh my god apr, you want so bad to discredit this movement don’t you! Stay on the case baby, perservere, dig, dig,dig! Perhaps you can find another racial epithet or two to give you the ogasmic joy you surely must lack in your life. Here’s another idea for ya ape, attend one! Yeah there’ll be plenty of them as the year progresses, surely one near you. What better way to find out firsthand what this movement is all about. You’ve given us your “take” on it repeatedly, but having been to several of them let me tell you you’re totally clueless. Better yet maybe you shouldn’t attend a tea party. When the realization hits you that these parties are made up of real genuine, kindhearted and very informed regular honest hard working family oriented people, you’re dissapointment may just send you into shock.

  • deadrino

    Watching her prattle on re-afirms my vote for Obama. I was getting doubtful about my decision earlier this month, but she did help alot. You betcha!

    and Tom Tancredo’s speech fills me with such happiness and delight with his repect for others and his truly Christian behavior. If only we had more people like him – maybe we could get the fires of Auschwitz lit again! What is a few million dead hispanics?

    I just got to ask, where do they find these people?

blog comments powered by Disqus