Todd Palin: Way More Than a First Dude

CORRECTION: The original version of this post said that MSNBC acquired Alaska state e-mails related to Todd Palin. It was msnbc.com.

After a long public records fight, msnbc.com finally got the goods on Todd Palin’s role in the Alaska state government when his wife was governor. About 3,000 pages of e-mails just released show that Todd was more than a sounding board. He regularly got deeply involved in state official business, participating in matters such as a judicial appointment and contract negotiations with state employees. Todd was so involved, in fact, that the state withheld 243 e-mails on the grounds that, according to msnbc.com, “executive privilege extends to Todd Palin as an unpaid adviser to the government.” The e-mails reveal quite a bit about Sarah Palin as well, including how she wanted her staff to handle installation of a tanning bed in the governor’s mansion and how she could get the state to foot the bill for her family’s air travel.

Much of what’s contained within the e-mails is not completely new information, but the correspondence is still worth perusing if only to check out Sarah Palin the governor in her own often Blackberry-generated words.

Also, kudos to msnbc.com and the other news organizations that kept fighting to get these e-mails released. These documents may serve mostly as juicy tidbits for Sarah Palin critics, while other successful public records request have had far more impact. (Here, for example.) But every time journalists or citizens get documents under the power of the Freedom of Information Act, there’s a tiny ripple effect that backs up the public’s right to know. Getting information this way is usually a long, arduous and incredibly frustrating experience. It’s very tempting to give up; public officials often give insane reasons why they can’t provide information. (In this case, the state of Alaska initially said it would cost $15 million to retrieve these e-mails, for instance.) Here’s msnbc.com’s complete “backstory” on the e-mail release:

When msnbc.com, other news organizations and citizens of Alaska sought Palin e-mail records after she was named the Republican vice presidential running mate in August 2008, the state initially quoted a cost as high as $15 million for state technicians to find the e-mails, for state interns to print out the e-mails one at a time, for state lawyers to read them to determine what information could be withheld, and for a print shop to photocopy them.

That’s still the laborious approach the state has taken, at what it says is a cost of more than $500,000 in staff time, but the prices it is charging have come down considerably. The state charged msnbc.com only $323.58 for the records released this week.

State officials said they could not figure out how to electronically search or distribute the e-mails. But such work is the bread and butter of firms like Crivella West, a Pittsburgh company which offered to do that work for the state for free. After the state ignored its offer, msnbc.com contacted the company, which agreed to scan in the photocopies to turn them back into searchable text, and to set up the documents in a public archive.

State law specifies that staff should respond to public records requests within 10 days, but it took Alaska much longer than that to produce the e-mails: The original request for these new e-mails was made in September 2008 by Aram Roston, an investigative producer for NBC News. He left NBC at the end of that year, and Palin left the governor’s post the next July, but the request ground on without them.

A broader request by msnbc.com and other news organizations for all e-mails sent and received by the governor and about 50 top officials — about 25,000 in all — is still pending. Last week, Sarah Palin’s former staff, now working for Gov. Sean Parnell, requested additional time, as required by the public records law, to respond.

Disclosure of private e-mails from government officials has been a legal issue in many states. For example, this week in North Carolina, news organizations are pursing a lawsuit to see the e-mails of the former Democratic governor, Mike Easley, who used a private, secret e-mail account to conduct state business.

State courts usually rule that correspondence between government officials, about government business, are public records, whether they use their government e-mail accounts or private ones.

In a second Palin case filed by McLeod, the Alaska resident seeking access to her e-mails, a state judge in Alaska ruled last month that it’s not necessarily a violation of the public records law for public officials to use personal e-mail accounts. Those e-mails may be public records, but only if the state agency decides to preserve them. The state has indeed preserved thousands of such records, and someday we’ll expect to see more of them from the Palin administration.

Related Topics: first dude, palin e-mails, Sarah Palin, todd palin, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • stuartzechman

    This pretty much says it all:

    Much of what’s contained within the e-mails is not completely new information, but the correspondence is still worth perusing if only to check out Sarah Palin the governor in her own often Blackberry-generated words.

    Access Hollywood for mediocre-looking celebrities.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    And while we wait endless months for these emails we’ll give you stories about death panels and insults aimed at her daughters and the parents of mentally challenged children everywhere.

  • nflfoghorn

    Amid the tanning bed revelation (wow) all this I fear will have a perverse effect – more people may actually LIKE her ’cause she’s just like ‘us,’ a la Linda Tripp.

  • nflfoghorn

    Teflon? Try armor plating!

  • nflfoghorn

    My sympathies to the Romero family BTW.

  • nflfoghorn

    You gotta admit she’s cute though. Kinda.

  • sacredh

    Todd helped make policy. I’m shocked. Maybe he just translated the big words for Sarah.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Isn’t this more of Sullivan/Scherer’s beat?

    Such a silly story.

  • charlieromeobravo

    Sure. Because a lie will run laps around the country a dozen times before Palin’s people would let the simplest and harmless truths go free. I find this incredibly funny for a couple of reasons.
    .
    1) it’s just so stupid that her administration / the Alaskan state government would take so long and make such dumb excuses only to eventually give up the documents for $323.58.
    .
    2) Hasn’t she preached transparency and accountability in government pretty frequently since she hit the scene in ’08?

    3) Her public response to this will be grand. More paranoid ravings from Our Lady of the Perpetual Victim.

  • deconstructiva

    Kate, thanks for this update. There may be more Sarah stuff coming, such as the recent news about her vacation cabins that weren’t declared for property taxes – http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35250913/ns/politics/
    .
    But you need to give props to the locals and Palin-focused sites doing the heavy lifting. The corporate, I mean, mainstream media are followers here, not leaders. Andree Mcleod is the one to credit (or blame, looking at both of you, rusty) for the emails. Local blogs like mudflats, Shannyn Moore, The Immoral Minority, and divablueoasis are the lead investigators. So are Palin-specific sites like Bree Palin and Palingates (these two also follow the babygate storyline, or as I call it, “Trig: Who’s Your Mommy?”). Kate, you, Jay, and other teammates are following these sites, yes?

  • melhoff13

    Would someone tell me how many posts have shown up regarding John Edwards? I’m not a huge fan of Palin, but is TIME, as a media outlet, being fair or only reporting on a specefic agenda?

  • charlieromeobravo

    Yeah, the contents probably aren’t worth the paper they’re printed on but how can that be known until it’s been read. You tell me what’s sillier, requesting these documents without knowing the scope of the content or fighting their release knowing how trivial the content is? How much did Alaska spend fighting this only to eventually capitulate? The Freedom of Information Act is an extremely important tool to maintain government accountability and I support its use wholeheartedly. Its unfortunately that government at all levels necessitates its use so frequently and needlessly.

  • melhoff13

    Todd in Alaska, Michelle in America…whats the difference? Hell, my taxes are paying for top of the line chefs to cook dinner for Michelle and the President. Where do we all draw the line?

  • melhoff13

    TIME has distingushed themselves as the new Enquirer magazine. They choose to make news and not really report too much on it.

  • Matt

    It is mind-boggling how utterly incompetent and full of self-importance Sarah Palin is.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • charlieromeobravo

    I think the point of the post is less about Palin and more about the Freedom of Information request and subsequent fight. The title wouldn’t really lead you to believe that before you read it though…

  • melhoff13

    Self-importance…..are you talking about Palin or Obama?

  • square1

    One thing that I know is that the tanning bed factoid is the kind of political gold that the GOP would use against an opponent for decades.

    It would be “Governor Jersey Shore” for the rest of a Democrats’ life (A tanning booth in the governor’s mansion gives new meaning to “The Situation” room). Somehow I doubt the Democrats will be that tough on Palin. If we are lucky we’ll get some jokes out of Leno about how when Palin saw Russian planes from her house, she thought “Code Orange” meant that she had to hide in the tanning bed.

  • square1

    Would someone tell me how many posts have shown up regarding John Edwards?
    .
    Why don’t you count the posts, you idiot?
    .
    Man, trolls are lazy.

  • charlieromeobravo

    There’s no reason to be tough on her. She’s not an opponent any more, just another pundit with a very limited audience. the people she speaks to aren’t on the fence about anything the Democrats do. She’s not out there creating new true believers for the Republican party, she’s just throwing red meat to her followers on Facebook.

  • deconstructiva

    …or just ignore / dismiss Sarah at your peril, whatever.

  • deconstructiva
  • square1

    There’s no reason to be tough on her. She’s not an opponent any more,

    Oh, really? It must have been my imagination when Democrats yanked end-of-life counseling out of HCR out of fear of Palin’s twitter feed.

    When Democrats realize that politics isn’t something you do for 6 months every 4 years then maybe they will accomplish something.

  • sacredh

    Every administration has a full staff of chefs. Every administration. What does Todd making policy in Alaska have to do with Michelle eating in DC? Each president and his family gets to eat well whether we want them to or not. There is no line to draw regarding this. If and when we see memos about Michelle making policy, then we can talk about what is appropriate.

  • pintortwo

    Agreed square1. However, I have no doubt that there will be more claims from Big Media of “liberal-media-attacks-Sarah-Palin” than there will be actual mentions of her transgressions. She, clearly, is the victim.

  • textee

    Nothing against unattractive, overweight, out of shape, 70 year-old women, but why did Saturday Night Live have an unattractive, overweight, out of shape, 70 year old woman (i.e., Tina Fey) play the part of an attractive, ideal weight, in shape, 45 year old woman (i.e., Sarah Palin)?

  • stuartzechman

    A prime argument of mine revolves around the notion that, in most cases, Democrats aren’t capitulating to the right, but that liberal Democrats are capitulating to Third Way Democrats, and therefore the Democrats –at least the leadership– are getting the Third Way policies they want (or nothing), and not merely acting out of rank cowardice or corruption.
    .
    Sometimes that prime argument of mine doesn’t accurately describe certain situations.

    When Senate Democrats “yanked end-of-life counseling out of HCR,” that was one of those times when the Democrats really were capitulating to the right out of rank, craven cowardice and lack of integrity –to their political detriment, of course.

  • Ivy_B

    At one point several Edwards posts a day. We were all sick and tired of them. You can go back and see for yourself. One of them, as I recall, was the only post on a week-end. It had a lot of comments because it was hijacked for a little substance.

  • charlieromeobravo

    “It must have been my imagination when Democrats yanked end-of-life counseling out of HCR out of fear of Palin’s twitter feed.”

    Yeah, good point.

  • charlieromeobravo

    Very classy…

  • apollyon07

    I’ll allow you to plea ignorance since I think you’re new here, but dude there were like 3 or 4 in one day a couple of weeks back. They all said basically the same thing and the writers of them were rightfully lambasted by us.

  • apollyon07

    I’m pretty sure Tina Fey is not 70 and would be considered attractive by most Americans.

  • cfukara

    Now the slow elephantine wingnuts know it – what we knew all along: Sarrah (of the exorcists and the telescope that sees Russia) in the WH or near it, means Todd, the fishy, is running things.

    Two dimwits of one dim wit running things at the WH – with Toddy answering the 3AM call?

    At least the conservatives are happy with the woman named Sarrah: Woman shall submit to man. Todd wears the pants in that house – and he was the de facto governor.

  • cfukara

    Pretty nifty way for Todd to achieve his successionist wishes, eh?

  • apr2563

    mel remember how horrified the right was about Hillary’s supposed involvement in policy and the shreek that went up when it was learned that Mrs. Carter sat in on an Executive meeting?

  • apr2563

    I don’t find these e-mails to be trivial. After all, she was close to being VP and perhaps President. Would she have turned over her duties to her husband, much like Bush did to Cheney?
    If you read them and other media information about Sarah, you will see a couple that suppressed information, used their political clout to intimidate others, and abused their power.
    Granted she is not a elected official now, but no one knows her intentions. Personally, I don’t think she will run for President. Sarah knows her limitations, is basically lazy and a quitter, and is having too much fun and earning too much money for her to let go of her celebrity.
    She does, however, have influence, through FOX and her other enablers.

  • apr2563

    Actually, Tina Fey is very attractive and younger than your heroine Sarah. Plus, she is smart and funny.

  • Ike Jakson

    Perhaps your reporter would have been satisfied if Todd had been appointed to the full-time staff like HillBilly in Hillaryland?

    This is hardly news! The poor reporter must have been behind her daily quota. Shame!

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    How many first ladies have had a 23 member personal staff like Michelle? I think the most staff members ever for a first lady before that was 3, and that was for first lady Hillary. I agree, lets have some real news. Of course all Sarah has to do is fart, and the liberals just go off the wall with it.

  • cfukara

    Ahem.
    We don’t do news at the swamp.

  • apr2563

    mel, you are so right. How many times has this liberal blog posted anything about FDR’s affairs or the Mayfair madam? There is old news and new news.

blog comments powered by Disqus