In the Arena

State of the Union

It was a terrific performance. He almost seemed to be having fun up there; he delivered the speech in a free, almost informal manner. It was easily digestible, user-friendly…but it was also a fighting speech. Certainly, he stuck the needle time and again into the hides of the recalcitrant elephants in the room. It started early in the speech when he recounted the numerous tax cuts that had been passed in the past year as part of his much-distorted Stimulus Plan, to applause from Democrats and silence from Republicans, and he ad-libbed, staring at the Republican side of the room, “I thought I’d get some applause on that one.”

Again and again, he challenged the opposition. He challenged them to come up with good ideas on health care. He challenged them to join in the leadership of the country, now that they had 41 Senate votes and insisted on a 60-vote super-majority to pass any bill. Even a lapidary line like, “Now let’s clear a few things up…” was barbed, since it referred to the shameless distortions that the Republican Party–and its house demagogues on Fox News–had inflicted on the health care reform process.

At the same time, he made a series of proposals that Republicans should love–like a new generation of nuclear power and judicious offshore drilling, like a capital gains tax holiday for small businesses, free-trade deals with South Korea, Panama and Korea. We’ll see if they’re willing to take yes for an answer.

That said, the substance of the speech wasn’t spectacular. The new proposals were modest. The freeze on discretionary spending, starting in 2011, still seems ill-advised. He was vague on when and how health care reform might be passed. The section on foreign policy seemed less than perfunctory.

But in the end–the very end–the eloquence and sense of purpose was riveting. The President described, as accurately as I’ve seen it done, the cynicism sapping the Republic–which also was a tacit attack on the Republicans in the room. He admitted that he’d had a tough year, had made mistakes…but he remained resolute.”I won’t quit,” he said. He encouraged the Congress not to quit, not to run away from the tough decisions, either–if previous Congresses had done that 50, 100, 200 years ago, “We wouldn’t be here.”

This was Obama at his best. He wasn’t cuddly, but who cares? He was smart and he was funny–and he was drop-dead serious about the country. The speech should do him some good, but it’s not enough. Now he has to preside, in the true sense of the term. He can’t let himself get caught up in the tawdy doings of the Congress. He has to stand above the muck, leading, jawboning a sense of responsibility–as he did tonight.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • kevin

    Great post. Agreed all around.

  • Ivy_B

    Thanks Joe.

  • mxyzptlk1953

    “numerous taxes ” – you mean tax cuts

  • formerlyjames

    I couldn’t agree more.

  • Joe Klein

    Thanks. I’ve fixed it above.

  • Professor

    I agree with your assessment of the speech Joe. I am especially pleased that he needled the opposition a little.

  • slowp

    Hey, WTF! I must’ve turned on SOTU too late: Who’s the homie? And where’s President McCain?!

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    Talk talk talk talk talk. Need some action.

  • 3xfire3

    Joe,
    You may also wish to correct Korea to Columbia.

  • Ike Jakson

    It’s just another typical “more of the same” Obama rhetoric with no substance, or any chance in hell that he means what he says. Hot wind is what the man is and hot wind is what you will get from him. Cry America!

  • Ivy_B

    “the people expect us to solve some problems, not run for the hills.”

    Hope that gets some Senators to get a grip.

  • stuartzechman

    Joe Klein:

    The President described, as accurately as I’ve seen it done, the cynicism sapping the Republic–which also was a tacit attack on the Republicans in the room.

    Actually, there was an explicit attack on your profession.
    .
    Funny that you didn’t mention that.

  • http://whatchannelareyouwatching.com Stephen Fofanoff

    And the Republicans say “NO!”

    And nothing else.

    When will BOTH parties learn that it’s time to actually work for the American people for a change. Obama said it best and completely understood the tone of America today. And, quite frankly, we have the party leaders to thank for that…. but above all, we have Republicans and the “Party of No (Ideas)” to really thank for it. Where have they been during the entire Health Care reform debate?? Oh yeah, eating at health insurance-funded dinners and talking to lobbyists behind closed doors to devise a plan to block the reforms Americans most desperately need, to scare the American people into thinking that health insurance companies know best and should be completely unregulated, and that the louder they shout “no”, the more “ideas” they’re presenting.

    And Democrats have completely dropped the ball… given the ultimate chance to govern, they’ve botched everything.

    Seriously, I have no idea why any one would vote for a member of either political party at this point.

    http://wcayw.com

  • 3xfire3

    Joe,
    You still sound like you have a thrill running up your leg. You are so biased towards Obama that you are incapable of giving an unbiased report on anything he does.
    The speech was delivered well but did little to dispel his big government ideas. His views are still too far to the left of a majority of American citizens. He will only be successful if he moves more to the center of our political system and gets away from many of his progressive views. Progressives such as you will be disappointed when the American public votes many of your members out of office in the 2010 elections. Americans are by nature an independent bred. Obama’s and your progressive views fit Europe not the USA.

  • stuartzechman

    So…are the Democrats the party of cutting taxes, now?

  • nathan7777

    Not going to have any action if the Republicans block everything. With power comes responsibility. The republicans have 41 votes. If they insist on needing 60 to pass anything, then they’ll actually have to start partaking in governing.

  • nathan7777

    “He will only be successful if he moves more to the center of our political system and gets away from many of his progressive views.”
    .
    You must have been listening to a different speech because he’s already at the center. If he moves any more right he’ll be a Republican. He talked about tax cuts, spending freezes, nuclear power, offshore oil drilling, capital gains tax waivers, small business job creation, and charter schools. All of these are Republican mainstays.
    .
    It’s not my fault that Republicans would prefer that our wages stay flat because health insurance premiums keep rising, or that our planet gets harmed because we keep using the air as a sewer system, or that we stay in a recession because Republicans are afraid to invest in our future, or that we continue to lose ground on exports because we keep subsidizing old and dirty technologies. It’s not my fault that Republicans believe neglect and intransigence is the best way to make America stronger.

  • spob

    The slam on SCOTUS was pretty jarring.

  • Jim, Foolish Literalist

    One of the best lines of the speech, IMHO. A week late, if anything.

  • http://thepage.time.com/2010/01/27/sotu-reax/ SOTU Reax – The Page by Mark Halperin – TIME.com

    [...] Joe Klein: "The eloquence and sense of purpose was riveting…. This was Obama at his best." [...]

  • kbanginmotown

    A little ray of hope shines again…

  • Mr. Nice Guy

    That’s what you get when you have self-serving partisan hacks in office – putting party ahead of country – rather than Americans who see problems that need to be solved and do what needs to be done. Shame on these vermin…

  • kingsbridge77

    Joe Klein said great things about Obama. Imagine my shock!

  • Cliff

    He was vague on when and how health care reform might be passed.
    .
    Really? (I didn’t watch the speech.)
    .
    Because that’s kind of a big deal.
    .
    There’s no excuse to be vague on the details of HCR when we were mere weeks away from getting something in place.
    .
    He can do whatever song and dance he damn well pleases, but if at the end of the day all we get is a shrug on health care…
    .
    Then there might as well have been no speech at all.

  • http://philosopher12.wordpress.com philosopher12

    A Great speech!!!!!!!!!!! Great President!!!! Great Man !!!!! But he can’t solve these problems alone and it can’t be done overnight.

  • azmaveth

    When Obama says stuff like, “Let me clear things up” or, “What I’ve said all along is,” it’s usually a preface to a duplicitous half-truth or a bald-faced lie. Klein is so pointedly divorced from objectivity on the Obama administration that Time shouldn’t be paying his salary. Both men are just more of the same line of lousy liars who’ve been trying to drag our country into the ant heap of communism for generations now. Instead of their “support the government effort to provide for all our needs” demands, let’s protect the liberty to solve our own problems and the freedom to reap the rewards of our own labor.

  • http://www.limed.se/state-of-the-union-swampland-time-com/ State of the Union – Swampland – TIME.com – The best HOT news! Blogs, Videos, News. – BEST News!

    [...] Visit link: State of the Union – Swampland – TIME.com [...]

  • shoutofgideon

    So the President used his first State of the Union to give a “fighting speech” focused on challenging the “opposition“.

    Which leaves me with 2 questions:

    Where was the post partisanship?

    It has been missing all year, and it was certainly missing from this “fighting speech” .

    Who exactly is the opposition?

    For a year now the Democrats have held the power to pass any legislation they desired. Which means the President’s agenda has been left undone because of the opposition of Democrats, not Republicans.

    The important point here is that the Democrats have left the President’s agenda undone because of the opposition of the American electorate (why else would a party oppose their own candidate’s agenda?).

    So exactly which part of the opposition was the President directing his “fighting speech” at, the Democrats or the American electorate?

  • kristiia

    and well deserved.

  • apr2563

    I have not seen it mentioned anywhere but I enjoyed how many times Obama mentioned an important piece of legislation that the House of Representatives had passed but was still not enacted by the Senate. He couldn’t say it but it is part of the bottleneck caused by the just say no Republicans and centerist Democrats.

  • Cliff

    Why couldn’t he say it? Why couldn’t he say “Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, and all forty Republicans are letting thousands of people die each year”?
    .
    I want to hear that. I want to hear him call a spade a spade.

  • apr2563

    Wouldn’t that have been great. I would have stood up and cheered. You said you didn’t watch the speech. Nelson and Lieberman sat next to each other. They looked like Bert and Ernie.

  • shoutofgideon

    You don’t call out centrist Senators for their position on an issue when a majority of the American electorate agrees with them.

    The latest CNN poll finds that 7 in 10 Americans support either scrapping health care reform altogether or starting over from scratch.

    Why would any candidate wish to remind America that they are angry at members of their own party for voting exactly the same as 210 million Americans would have?

  • apr2563

    RIP Howard Zinn

  • apollyon07

    “…the substance of the speech wasn’t spectacular.”
    .
    “…the eloquence and sense of purpose was riveting.”
    .
    And that’s President Obama in a nutshell.

  • http://fourlegsrgood.wordpress.com fourlegsgood

    Wow. Did you fall on your head as a child? Obama could say kittens are cute and fluffy and your childish party would scream, “NO!! they ARE NOT!! we are going to FILIBUSTER!!!”

    Wanna know who the opposition is? look in the mirror.

  • allthingsinaname

    Yes it was a very good speech, unfortunately it is one that must be given daily to Congress in Public, to get through to those who are supposed to do the work. With out the constant reminder to the public the Republicans will constantly tell the Public the correct answer is no.
    .
    I simply can not say it any simpler, he is the only one who can drive the nattion. He simply has to understand that.

  • jcapan

    Apol, trust that it pains me greatly to agree with you.
    .
    PS Apr, thanks for posting that. Zinn’s worth a 1000 villagers.

  • tharwatfawzi

    Thank you.
    It is unfortunate that President Obama have not yet disclosed all the facts about the two wars that he has inherited from past Republican administrations and that have resulted in this present huge deficit that all Americans are suffering from.

  • http://elvishartryinc.wordpress.com elvishartryinc

    Obama really showed his “toughness”…or stupidity. If only he had ever held a real job. If only he had ever really lived like the rest of us it. I would have resonated. Unfortunately, he resonated with the spoiled. He resonated with Hollywood. Normal job holding Americans think he is an idiot. After getting his butt handed to him in Massachusetts he actually thinks people believe that the George Bush brought all this on. Hey America, George Bush is an idiot! But guess what, he doesn’t make policy! Congress does. And it has been Democrat. Klein is either stupid or disingenuous. Hmmmm.

  • http://elvishartryinc.wordpress.com elvishartryinc

    It this the same “Congress” that has been in power over the past four years? So you are saying that Congress is the one who must make the change? That’s interesting because the “Administration” is not Congress. I guess Congress is responsible for where we are at now. Democrats. I never hear Obama blaming them. One year, no change. Only whining. But now he’s a tough guy! I “hope” he “changes”. Ha Ha Ha! It’s never his fault. I heard him in a speech one time (to a standing ovation) saying, “Blame me!” He loved the accolades. He just stood there soaking it in. Now, it’s “Blame Bush!” It makes it a lot easier to blame someone else. Obama loves himself. There is nothing clearer than that. Look at the speech again with that on your mind. He truly loves himself. It’s really sad. Count how many times he says “I” or “me”. Does he practice this stuff in a mirror?

  • razionaltinker

    Thank you Joe Klein, you nailed my reaction entirely
    and worded it quite well.
    This IS the obama, I campaigned for.

  • apr2563

    Oh shout, you know that HCR has been demigoged. You know that many polls, when broken down to specifics (eg public option), show large support.
    How much longer would you approve delaying HCR and jeapordizing peoples lives?
    The only thing Reps propose is tort reform. That’s fine but it decreases costs by less than 2%. It has done nothing to decrease costs in states that have tort reform.
    Their proposal to allow interstate purchasing of health insurance will just free insurance cos. to go to states with the least regulation. Something like credit card companies do.
    If the Dems break out some of the reforms in the original bill, such as eliminating pre-existing disease rules, not allowing recission, putting caps on premiums, doing away with anti-trust exemption for health ins. cos., do you think the Reps will vote in favor of those measures, all things the majority of people want?

  • apollyon07

    I applaud your honesty, I know it’s probably not easy for you to admit. Deep down I think everybody realizes this.

  • apollyon07

    the President egging on Congress to jeer the SC in the State of the Union address? That’s gotta be a first. Classless if you ask me but not too big of a deal. Alito’s timid response was appropriate.

  • apollyon07

    Nathan, then maybe the Democrats should grow a pair and push back. There’s ways around a furious opposition, especially when you have a 59-41 majority and a popular President. Come on.

  • http://thepage.time.com/2010/01/28/sotu-reax/ SOTU Reax – The Page by Mark Halperin – TIME.com

    [...] Joe Klein: "The eloquence and sense of purpose was riveting … This was Obama at his best." [...]

  • tjoyce994

    Why do you think he hasn’t lived like the rest of us? He didn’t grow up wealthy, he went to college on scholarship, and his first job was helping the indigent. He lived with his grandparents for goodness sake. There is nothing elitist about that.
    -
    The fact that he went to Harvard really seems bother some people, and I don’t understand why. Most of our presidents have come from Ivy league schools, and I don’t ever remember seeing this level of contempt before now.

  • http://ibw2.wordpress.com ibw2

    Is it Obama’s place to say when the Health Care Bill will pass or the determination of the Senate?

  • Matt

    It was a speech that helped the president more than it helped Democrats. He is forcing the base to make very tough decisions that they will most likely shirk from. But it’s possible the boot to Obama from the SOTU could rub off on the Dems in general.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • kathy

    Agree with you Joe et al. Great speech, and especially good because it didn’t seem to be defensive. He was relaxed in a way that should have given pause to those who think the WH is in a panic.

    In saying he hadn’t “explained” adequately, I’d say he hasn’t pushed back adequately. Consequently, too many people think

    1) That Obama raised taxes, because the Republicans keep saying so.

    2) That the government is going to “run health care,” as the response to SOTU reiterated.

    3) That the bailout of the banks has cost us a great deal more than it did. In fact, lots of people confuse TARP with the stimulus.

    But he was very consistent in referring to “Washington” in the way Reagan would have. never “we.”

  • freeinpa

    What we had last night was a child stamping his feet and whining it’s not my fault!
    ==

    He bashes the Republicans for the threat of filibustering and stopping his agenda— After a year in which the Democrats had the White House and super majority in both Houses.

    We controlled everything but its your fault Wah WAh !!

  • tjoyce994

    We heard different speeches, because I heard him take the dems to task as well.

  • shoutofgideon

    In saying he hadn’t “explained” adequately, I’d say he hasn’t pushed back adequately. Consequently, too many people think … that Obama raised taxes, because the Republicans keep saying so.

    Every time a President’s budget increases our national deficit, they have increased our taxes. The only question is which generation will be paying for it.

    If you are under the age of 50, the Republicans and Democrats have both increased your future taxes astronomically over the past decade. If you are under the age of 35, your future tax burden is going to be staggering.

    Let’s stop pretending otherwise and start holding our elected officials, ALL of our elected officials, accountable for this.

  • freeinpa

    Full control to pass whatever he wanted. Bashing the Repubs and Bush was childish. And why does he wait until the SOTU to take Demos to task?

    Bambi is in over his head

  • nomorekoolaid

    It is the ultimate in hypocracy for the Prez to stand up there and chastise the GOP for standing in the way of things and to preach about the need to rise above soundbites about opponents’ failures, etc. What did the Dems do for the last 8 years? When did they (including Barack himself in the Senate) ever lay down their arms against the GOP and GWB to look for solutions and progress? Never. Five minutes after the dust cleared from 9/11, they went on the attack. That is not to say that both sides need to clean up their act and someone needs to decide to “be the bigger man”….because the country needs that right now. But it really sickened me to hear it coming from one of the worst offenders last night, just because it would now benefit him.

  • melhoff13

    He can read a script as good as anyone, but what has he done for me? WE THE PEOPLE

  • melhoff13

    Are we still blaming Bush? Why is Gitma still open? I’m confused…

  • melhoff13

    Gitmo…wow, my spelling is wonderful.

  • melhoff13

    Beautiful. When Bush was in office it was his fault. Now Obama is in office, it’s the republicans fault. Wow, does anyone ever accept responsibility. Both parties should pull their heads out of their ****.

  • 3xfire3

    Nathan,
    When you are first in line on the very far left of our political system, I guess anything to your right seems to be in the center.
    Obama ran as a moderate [which was a lie] and then tried to govern as a left/progressive.
    The moderates who elected him are now rebelling against his progressive policies. He talks moderate and then surrounds himself with extreme progressives. The vast majority of Americans do not believe in the progressive direction that President Obama wants to take the country. Hopefully the Democratic Party will wake up before he destroys it.

  • bill117

    “He was funny” …the only laughter I heard was when they laughed at him.

  • http://www.xanga.com/Amythist_Malaise sheila0405

    Most of the proposals enumerated in the speech either ought to have already been accomplished under the current stimulus package, or ought to have been put forth by the Administration in the early months of the Presidency. We already should have shovel ready infrastructure jobs underway. And, instead of dismissing the ideas of off shore drilling & the construction of new nuclear plants put forth by McCain/Palin, President Obama should have endorsed them. The President’s treatment of the Supreme Court reveals his character: this President sees the Constitution as an obstacle to his vision of redistribution of wealth & stronger government intrusion into the lives of Americans. The Supreme Court was invited to the speech, as was the President himself. One guest ought not to insult another guest at any gathering. I was shocked by the President’s rude behavior. His rebuke of the Supreme Court ruling makes Joe Wilson’s “you lie!” look like good etiquette.

  • 3xfire3

    You are correct. I could not have said it better myself.

  • vaille

    Nothing about last night’s SOTU impressed me. In effect, it was little more than a synthesis of two year old campaign speeches. Don’t believe me, do some research. Five minutes on the internet will prove me correct. That said, this administration and its left of center policies are floundering in a center-right country. At a time when our economy needed viable economic leadership focused upon jobs, what does the administration give us? An unhealthy dose of leftist, liberal ideology – health care “reform”, cap and trade, a failed stimulus bill. Of course, we, the citizens, are simply not bright enough understand the brilliance behind these inititives…esp. the stimulus, right Joe? Give me a break.
    I consider myself a moderate independent; I’ve voted Democrat as readily as I’ve voted Republican. Come November (and probably for the next few election cycles, for that matter), I’ll be punching a straight “R” ticket…not because I necessarily love the GOP, but because they are simply not Democrats. Let’s lose the leftist tripe and start working on some meaningful policy…

    .

  • http://money.blogs.time.com/2010/01/28/sotu-by-the-numbers-107-applause-breaks-18-minutes-wasted/ SOTU by the Numbers: 107 Applause Breaks, 18 Minutes Wasted – It's Your Money – TIME.com

    [...] my count, there were 107 pauses in President Obama's State of the Union. This doesn't include dramatic pauses, or the grand finale of applause when the speech was over. [...]

  • http://www.xanga.com/Amythist_Malaise sheila0405

    If you punch a straight “R” ticket you will be doing great harm to the nation. It isn’t about parties, it’s about the Constitution and the direction of the nation. If everyone votes straight “R” we will keep people like Olympia Snowe in office. People have to get serious about returning to the founding principles of this great nation, and that means any incumbent, no matter which party, needs to be sent packing who does not actually defend & promote the Constitution.

  • Ike Jakson
  • rgrimm

    You are joking right. You didn’t evaluate what was said or what is happening in congress. If this was an evaluation I think I’d switch to another post that atleast gives insight or criticism. if you kissed his backside anymore when he stopped your head would ram itself up his #%$. If you’ve ever been in the military you know on a small scale what will happen to health care in America if the Health Care Plan as it is passes now. maybe some one can explain why if our government is going to regulate private business it doesn’t start with the insurance companies. If you take the insurance companies split out of the health care business we could have an affordable plan. The insurance companies don’t add anything into health care they merely regulate it to make a profit….. hmmmm why don’t we support that. Taxing the banks is great if they didn’t just pass the cost on to us……lol. why doesn’t he just raise taxes. ohhh yah he said he wouldn’t….. hmmm but if he’s not going to keep his promise on transparenty why bother keeping promises at all. Unless the idiots that are listening need help thinking for them selves. Ohhh yah he made that statement to. Glad the president could tell you what to think and you could fall inline. great reporting keep up the hard work. lol

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    Joe,

    What you offer up as “analysis” is nothing more than a verbal lapdance with BHO. I do not have enough room, or patience, to outline the ways this speech was weak, disingenuous, and vapid. Suffice it to say that this newly populist President, when calling out Republicans for not offering “good ideas” (i.e.; “progressive ideas”) and the Supreme Court for a decision supported by the ACLU, AFL/CIO, US Chamber of Commerce, etc., is solidifying his descent into the pantheon of high-minded, low-accomplishment, failed politicians

  • bbh777

    You really have to be kidding. A good speech?? What a pathetic joke this was. He was all over the place and did not achieve ANYTHING, which is not suprising since he hasn’t achieved anything except driving the country into a hole of debt we will never get out of in the past year. This speech was nothing but defiance and disrespect and more Obama lies. And then he actually had the audacity to criticize the Supreme Court!!! His speech was an effort to tell the American people that he could care less what we believe as voters. He is going to FORCE his pathetic agenda on us whether we like it or not, even if it means cicumventing the Constitution to do it. He is anti-business, anti-freedom and anti-American. He follows religiously the teaching of Saul Alinsky, and even seems to hope to emulate what Alinsky believed. This President is a socialist in disguise, yet he isn’t afraid to disguise it any more.

  • carolann1e

    I thought the republicans were out of line. I saw a couple of them” texting” each other during the speech. That is sort of middle school behavior. I liked the last 15 minutes of the speech better than the first 15 minutes. He did a good job imploring people to be americans first and do what is best for america. He was a bit nervous I think. That surprised me.

  • http://randomkirk.wordpress.com randomkirk

    How, exactly, were the Republicans out of line? Because some of them might have been reading their Blackberrys? Isn’t that something BHO is famous for? What’s the big deal? There is no obligation for Congress (or anyone else, for that matter) to sit in rapt awe of the President and to applaud at every applause line. Heaven knows GWB never got that kind of treatment.

    As for Americans putting the country first, that sentiment seems to only apply if the views held by the Republicans are in direct alignment with the Dems. Just because an idea is postulated by a Republican doesn’t make it a bad idea.

  • http://renava.wordpress.com renava

    But in the end–the very end–the eloquence and sense of purpose was riveting. The President described, as accurately as I’ve seen it done, the cynicism sapping the Republic–which also was a tacit attack on the Republicans in the room. He admitted that he’d had a tough year, had made mistakes…but he remained resolute.”I won’t quit,” he said. He encouraged the Congress not to quit, not to run away from the tough decisions, either–if previous Congresses had done that 50, 100, 200 years ago, “We wouldn’t be here.”

    Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/01/27/state-of-the-union-2/#ixzz0e0i6mCoz

    The cynicism as you call stems from the fact that the Democrats, lead by President Obama and Nancy Pelosi, have yet to allow the Republicans from participating and debating the policies and issues currently facing this administration. The administration has yet to show that they can be transparent, as promised by Obama during his presidential campaign.

    I know that most of “Time” magazine reporters are bleeding liberals who absolutely love Obama, but why can’t you all tell the truth?

    Stop sucking up and playing it safe to Obama and start reporting the truth and doing “real” journalism.

  • http://renava.wordpress.com renava

    Reply to: randomkirk
    January 28, 2010
    at 8:19 pm
    Reply to this comment

    Wow, well said.

  • http://renava.wordpress.com renava

    Suffice it to say that this newly populist President, when calling out Republicans for not offering “good ideas”

    Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/01/27/state-of-the-union-2/comment-page-2/#comment-128465#ixzz0e0k0r2RE

    Obviously Obama doesn’t see the truth and what has really been happening in Congress. The Repulbicans have tried since day one of this administration to submit their ideas. But all they received was the cold-shoulder and closed doors from the Democrats who have chosen to exclude Republicans from the democratic process.

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    Joe,

    I REALLY hope you read this. You and your ILK are BAD for the US. Time ragazine is declining in readership. You are a good reason why. Your demagoguery to a shrinking audience is NOT helping you. Your New York attitude that the rest of the country is beneath you shows your prejudice, that you think you are smarter than “We the people.”
    Your belief that you can browbeat the majority of us for having the audacity to see through the hype of the current occupant in the White House, shows your disdain for the American people. Obama got only 7 percent more votes than an unpopular John McCain, most of those percentage points came from a racist Black vote, in which Obama received over 95%, only because he had a black father.
    We now see, after many who voted for him because they saw, what Obama himself said, “Was what they wanted to see”, that they are starting to come out of the mezmerization of the Obama that the MSM built him up to be. No more are women fainting when he reads to them from his tele-prompter.
    You need to wake up Joe. You also need to understand that even if you have a hatred and loathing of over half the nation, that they are bad people.
    You and your liberal friends had a wake up call in Massachusetts this month. The problem is you refuse to see what happened. The good people in Massachusetts sent a warning shot over the bow of you socialists ship that they do not want what you are pushing, and yet you still want to push that socialism onto them. You say, “They have a state run health care system.” Well, yes they do. It is constitutional for the states to do whatever they want, because the Constitution says they can, it however DOES NOT GIVE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT AUTHORITY. Unfortunately for you and your socialist buddies, that document DOES exist. Nowhere in the Constitution is it enumerated for Congress to take so much control over the American People. The Preamble is NOT enumerated power.
    Your guy, Obama, is reading the TEA leaves, last week one of his cabinet members floated the idea that Obama is a one term president, this week He even says he is comfortable with that aspect ( http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/52886 ). Know why Joe? Because over half of the US now say they would not vote for him knowing the devastation he (and the MSM like you, who tooted his horn) has brought to our country.
    Just keep it up Joe, and we will see the lowest vote a president running for a second term will get in the history of US Presidential races.
    This president is a failure in greater proportions than Jimmy Carter, and THAT only after 1 year. THAT truly IS amazing.

    Livingfortruth.wordpress.com

  • maureen766

    Thanks, Joe. It’s refreshing to read a journalist who tells the truth about President Obama’s strengths and weaknesses instead of twisting his words in order to portray him as an evil power-grabber.

  • http://www.xanga.com/Amythist_Malaise sheila0405

    No one needs to twist the President’s words–he himself, with his veto threat, Executive Order threat, and derision of the separation of powers, reveals his power grabbing nature.

  • tjoyce994

    “Obama got only 7 percent more votes than an unpopular John McCain, most of those percentage points came from a racist Black vote, in which Obama received over 95%, only because he had a black father.”
    -
    African Americans have traditionally voted as democrats, regardless of the candidate’s skin color. African Americans feel alienated from the republican party. It is unreasonable to believe that they should or would vote against the party that shares their values simply because the candidate looks like them.

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    tjoyce994,

    Could you tell me what values Blacks and democrats share? Do they share making laws that destroy the black family? (Great Society and the failed “war on poverty”, which paid black women to not get married and give an increased stipend for each child they have? Isn’t that what the slave owners did? But instead of picking cotton, they are giving votes). How about the wholesale destruction of black children with targeted abortions in the black community? How about building “projects” in order for blacks to live in squalor for very low government payments (for their votes)?
    (The same can be said for low income whites.)
    By continuing to vote for the slave-master democrat party, blacks need to follow the drinking gourd to freedom! One would think after 40 years people would learn a lesson.

  • stewartiii

    NewsBusters: TIME’s Joe Klein Loved Obama Attack on GOP and ‘Its House Demagogues on FOX News’
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/01/29/times-joe-klein-loved-obama-attack-gop-and-its-house-demagogues-fox-news

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    BTW Tjoyce,

    It was in fact the democrats war on poverty that created most of the poverty we have today. Democrats have a propensity for passing bills that in name, sound good, but in fact are loaded with unintended consequences, to name a few:

    Social Security- (Now Bankrupt) Caused many NOT to save for retirement- eventuated the decline of pensions for workers at businesses and the establishment of 401K’s which are nothing more than casino bets.

    Medi-care-Now bankrupt, Obama pulling $500,000,000 away from it, nothing more fascism in the fact that the government tells doctors how much they can charge, even if it means loosing money, the reason some doctors are not accepting medi-care patients any longer.

    It is funny how Obama and the democrats are demonizing the Health Care Industry (Most democrats in the Senate make far more per year than most CEO’s of the Health Care Industry, and how are the democrats doing that? (insider trading perhaps?) It is interesting that NO CEO of a Health Care Insurance company has been indicted or is under investigation for ethics violations, yet those pointing their fingers in mocked shame ARE and have been convicted!)

    For more on who the REAL criminals are read:

    http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/questions-need-to-be-answered-in-health-care-debate/

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    I love http://www.newsbusters.org
    They are a god-send to those who know the liberal media are liars and skewers of the truth. BTW, Walter Cronkite was a skewer of the truth as well. He was probably one of the worst of them. When his own company was the one who promoted him as “Most Trusted Name” enough times, it was like a Goebbels moment,

    Hey TIME, we don’t believe you any more, (some of us never did.) and you subscribership shows it!

  • tjoyce994

    First of all no one owes you an explanation for why they vote for a specific political party. The normal assumption is that they voted their personal interest. You will recall that you jumped to the conclusion that the only reason a black person would vote for Obama was his skin color. Your comment is not only short-sighted, but it begs the question why everyone else voted for Obama. African Americans only make up 12% of the country, and could not have elected Obama alone.
    -
    Second, you totally overlook the fact that there are only two major political parties, and Republicans have gone out of their way to let African Americans know that we aren’t welcome. Michael Steele has his job simply because republicans want a black man to voice their rude, obnoxious comments. We are supposed to be stupid enough to think the comments aren’t racist, because a black man has been paid to say them. So far, Steele isn’t obnoxious enough for mainstream republicans. Would you vote for a party that viewed you as stray animals, Willie Horton, Welfare queens, etc? Take you pick of the insult of the week, month or decade.
    -
    Third, you and I see the Great Society Programs and the War on Poverty differently. I don’t know your experience, but I was one of the children who got a hot lunch for a quarter. Some of my class mates got free lunch. I had summer jobs through the Neighborhood Youth Corp. I became the first person in my family to go to college due to EEOG college loan programs. I have advanced degrees, and I am an entrepreneur now. I know that Headstart works, because I once worked in the program.
    -
    The idea that the government pays black women to have children is an inaccurate, racist stereotype. I am going to assume that your comments are merely ignorant and not malicious. The program that you reference, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, is not limited to black people or even to just women and children. It served as a safety net for poor people of all colors. That includes white people. Recipients are allotted a set amount of money for the head of household and for each dependent. Obviously if there is an additional dependent, there is an additional allotment. Arguing the value of the program is one thing. Only an imbecile would consider it paying women for procreating.
    -
    You are also in desperate need of a history lesson. Your assumption that slave masters increased stipends for black women to discourage marriage and to have children is grossly inaccurate. Slaves weren’t paid at all. By definition, slaves don’t own their labor. Slaves were considered property and listed in plantation records along with the heifers, pigs, goats and hay. Slave masters didn’t have to discourage marriage; they simply didn’t have to permit it. Women were forced to mate with the master’s choice (that often included the master himself) or be beaten. I have issues with the Democratic Party, but I don’t think they are guilty of such behavior.
    -
    If I understand you, you first argued that the democrats paid black women to have children, but you also argue that the dems also target these same children for abortion. That’s an inconsistent argument.
    -
    Let me clarify something for you, Livingfortruth. I am no one’s slave, I don’t have a master, and I don’t need you to lead me to freedom. Frankly, you sound a little confused and disoriented.

  • apr2563

    Living, realty bites:
    Health insurance CEO compenstions 2008
    Aetna 24,300,000
    Cigna 12,200,000
    Well Point 9,844,000
    Coventry Health 9.047.000
    Humana 4,764,000
    Health Net 4,425,000
    This does not include other stock options and perks. And, this was a bad year for them.
    Now tell me the average salary of a member of the Senate. Not their independent wealth (McCain, Rockerfeller).

  • tjoyce994

    Thank you, apr2563.
    -
    Livingfortruth, you might want to read my 49.1 response.

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    APR2563,

    CAN YOU READ? I did not do the comparison that you are doing, I stated they MAKE, that WOULD be net worth. Members of the SENATE, many of which are under investigation for ethics violation MAKE MORE THAN THOSE CEO’s. HOW ARE THEY ABLE TO DO THAT WHEN BEFORE THEY GOT THERE THEY WERE UPPER MIDDLE CLASS? The Senate leader has done so with questionable land deals in Nevada. SO FOCUS. It will help you stay in reality.
    I stated a<b you read into it a=b.

    You also missed the MAIN POINT, Washington is pointing fingers at the CEO's as being evil, when it is THEY who are the ones who are indicted and under investigation.

    http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/questions-need-to-be-answered-in-health-care-debate/

  • apr2563

    Living: I am literate, are you? I asked you to list the salaries of Senators who make more than the health insurance CEOS listed. You did not. Making does not equate to net worth. What I make per diem is less than my net worth. If your understanding of economics is so limited, please refrain from comparisons.
    As far as political corruption, no one is denying them. There is plenty of “internal” ethics questions being investigated.
    What the CEOS do is legal robbery.

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    - YOU brought it up, I was answering your topic!
    - What “RACIST” statement have the Republicans made? Which party still has a past GRAND WIZARD of the KKK in it? What party has a Senate Leader which makes it ok for me to incorporate Negro in my speech now?
    -You are welcome from those who paid for your lunch, and schooling. Just because you worked somewhere does not mean it is successful.
    -I quote YOU “Recipients are allotted a set amount of money for the head of household and for each dependent.” In MY book it is paying for each additional dependant. Which was the point I made. I also state “poor whites” as well. You can call it racist, I disagree. IT KILLED THE BLACK FAMILY, which traditionally had better numbers than whites until and after the 1960′s. Why are/were women (black, white, hispanic) who could not afford to feed children they already have, still producing more? Answer this question. If a poor woman has another child, IS she going to be paid more for that extra dependent? From the above quote from you, the answer is yes. A+B in this case = C.
    -You are purposely misconstruing what I am saying, AND you are factually wrong. Slave holders DID pay their slaves with FOOD and SHELTER and SECURITY, as long as they did what the slave-owner wanted, today it is to keep voting for them, at least the slaves had safe places to stay. Those who live in trailer parks in small towns have children who are sexually and physically abused, those who live in slums of the big cities have to fear for their lives and have their windows barred, doors with 5 or more locks on them and have neighborhoods full of crack houses, have fear of drive by shootings, rapes. But hey, they vote for democrats at for that stipend. AND THEY VOTED FOR OBAMA @ 97% if whites did the same thing you would be calling them racists, that is exactly what I am calling blacks, or should I say negros? Oh and by way, the democrats consider blacks property as well, for they know that no matter what they do (keep a grand wizard of the KKK among their ranks) or what they say (Democrat Senate Leader using Negro and the Vice President calling Obama a “clean” African American, as if most are not.
    -Which party is for abortion?
    Democrats are NOT the black or poor American’s friends.

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    Their net gain per years IS what they are making, and most would not have a net worth HIGHER than the republicans IF they were not taking under the table info on what to invest in, or taking sweetheart deals. THEIR NET WORTH IS HIGHER THAN THOSE CEO’S that you are griping about. How about you go after Steve Jobs and Those upper echelon Microsoft owners? Or Michael Jordan?
    It is your OPINION they are legally robbing people. What you are doing is really called coveting. Also, it was Ted Kennedy working with Kaiser Permanente in the 80′s that set in motion this debacle.

  • tjoyce994

    Livingintruth, does this post sound familiar?
    -
    “Obama got only 7 percent more votes than an unpopular John McCain, most of those percentage points came from a racist Black vote, in which Obama received over 95%, only because he had a black father.”
    -
    I didn’t start this, you did. I’ve already enumerated some offensive republican comments. It is irrelevant whether you consider them offensive. I claim the right to determine what is offensive to me. I don’t consider the use of the word Negro, especially in a 70 year old man, offensive or racist. It’s merely outdated. You have the wrong N word.
    -
    Part of my schooling was in loans, which I have repaid. However, you still haven’t given me any information regarding your personal experience with the War on Poverty programs. You seem very eager to discount mine. Do you have any or is your information limited to something you read, which was written by someone equally uninformed? You say that the program isn’t successful just because I worked somewhere. I disagree. The fact millions of Americans worked, became educated, taxpaying citizens speaks to the program’s success. Do you even have a yardstick for measuring success?
    -
    As I said, you can argue the merits of Aid to Families with Dependent Children, but only a moron would argue that women were paid to pro-create. Men and women who mate and don’t practice birth control usually produce children. Poor women have children they can’t afford because they usually mate with poor men. It’s biology gone bad, not commerce. We have to agree to disagree. In this country, 60% of all marriages end in divorce; that includes white families. Who killed them?
    -
    You have no understanding of history or slavery as it existed in American. Your comments are simply too silly to address.
    -
    You do live in stereotypes. Are you implying that the only reason anyone would vote for a democrat is for a stipend? What stipend? How does that explain democrats who own their own homes and businesses? How does that explain young college students who campaigned for Obama – in all of his elections? If you are insinuating that Obama voters all live in crack houses, trailer parks and slums, you have insulted a lot of people of all colors. Did it ever occur to you that they were voting against the republicans because – wonder of wonders – republicans don’t share their values?
    -
    Let me try this one more time. African Americans tend to be democrats and vote for the Democratic Party 90% of the time. Obama was the democratic candidate for president. It is not racist for African Americans to vote democratic simply because a black man heads the ticket. It was consistent, predictable behavior.
    -
    You say that whites would be called racist if they did the same thing. Well, they do the same thing. White people – euphemistically referred to as Nascar Dads and soccer moms – routinely vote for white candidates. We don’t call them racists. We call them republicans. I assume they vote for republicans because the republicans share their values.

  • momo33

    SERIOUSLY! You actually believe what Obama says??
    Everyone knows that he just says whatever he thinks the audience Wants to hear. Then he does whatever he wants to an hour later. What are you, one of those willingly ignorant Lemming?
    He just stated the same lies he has said already in many other Lectures he has given to the people. Really not much new here. Same Blame Bush for what HE VOTED ON crap and what HIS OVER SPENDING has caused. I guess Obama and the leftist still think WE THE PEOPLE are still stupid. Sorry, but we know this game now, and are more informed then EVER. This is the most anti American/anti prosperity/ anti Freedom/ power grabbing/ big government President in history. Why would anyone go along with that? He is acting like a Dictator wannabe that can’t get his way, stomping around and blaming everyone but himself. He is even pulling a Hugo Chaves using “the Class Envy” card. PATHETIC and very community organizer/agitator of him. (Saul Alinski would be proud! )
    NOT very Presidential!
    Not much of a leader, it makes him look really weak! How did you not see that?

    ~~~~~

    “I thought I’d get some applause on that one.” ~ WHY would they applaud lies and things he does not really intend to do?

    “Again and again, he challenged the opposition. He challenged them to come up with good ideas on health care.” They have ~ HE REFUSES to listen or let them into the room!

    It is not the Repub fault if Obama can not get all of his Dems to agree with all of his destructive policies.
    The Dems could have passed anything, they have/had both houses. THEY were in power! They did not need any Repubs. I thought you were supposed to be smart or something and know these BASIC facts.

    Seems to me it is all the Dems fault that they do not want “Bi-Partisanship” They just want Repubs to give up their principles so the Dems get their way. That is NOT bipartisanship. That is: “do it my way or we will tell the MSM it is all the Repubs fault, and we will cry like babies until we get our way”. PATHETIC.

    What Pathetic leftist little Whining BABIES!

  • http://livingfortruth.wordpress.com livingfortruth

    Ok, I’ll give you that 89% of blacks vote to continue their status quo. What about the other 8% who voted for Bush? They must be the racists.

    Tell me, what has voting for democrats gotten MOST blacks in the last 40 years? It sure hasn’t gotten them upwardly mobile. The same can be said for the poor whites and hispanics.

    You know what, the democrats know you will vote for them, they take you for granted. And as long as the black community keeps voting for them in rote fashion, they will continue in the socio/economic position they find themselves. You know why? Government won’t help people to be self motivated enough to give themselves the incentive to gain a better life for themselves.

    BTW,
    I am not republican, I am a conservative. But you might be surprised in some of my beliefs.
    I was born poor and white in Texas. Went into the military when I was 19 after working mowing lawns @ age 12 and various other jobs. Since I left the Air Force after 11 years, I have not been without a job until my position was eliminated at a not for profit that helps kids who have been through the court system. I was adopted from a woman who had other children already who could not afford another mouth to feed. Still my parents, even though older and poor took me out of that situation.
    I am an example that if you work hard, and get out of an environment that thwarts, even saps ones initiative, one can be successful and enjoy life.
    I believe in freedom over security.

  • tjoyce994

    I would call the 8% who voted for Bush either Republicans or Independents. I haven’t applied the term racist to anyone’s vote; you have. I think you are wrong to do so.
    -
    Again, no one owes you a justification for their vote. I’m sure you know that there are many prosperous African Americans and Latins. Many would disagree with you that their upward mobility is unrelated to their politics. Most African Americans don’t believe they do as well when the republicans are in power. That’s reason enough not to vote for Republicans. Some people would question what lower middle class whites get out of their affiliation with the Republican Party, the party of big business. I would say their vote is their personal business.
    -
    I see a republican party composed of old, angry white men with God complexes. America becomes browner every day. Smart republicans know that there needs to be a better appeal to minorities, if the party is to grow. We’re waiting.
    -
    It doesn’t surprise me that your are white, born poor or from Texas. It also wouldn’t surprise me if you lived in a predominantly white community and had very little social contact with minorities outside of work. I don’t have a problem with you live story. The issue I have with you is that you are disrespectful of any story that is different from your own. I don’t consider your life any more of a success than my own. It’s your loss that you don’t see that. BTW, you have yet to answer my question regarding your first hand experience with the War on Poverty Programs.
    -

  • arturovandelay

    Another Obama owned member of the MSM. How much did the DNC pay for TIME? If it was more than $4 it was too much.

blog comments powered by Disqus