With Response To Haiti, Bill Clinton Returns To Spotlight

Bill Clinton has been in hiding. Not literally, of course. But in practice–totally. Since his dispiriting turn in the 2008 elections–offending Ted Kennedy, calling Obama a “fairy tale,” bumbling in South Carolina–the former president made the hard call: He volunteered to leave the public spotlight so that his wife could become Secretary of State. And even that earned him no brownie points, just more concern. As the new book Game Change reveals, Hillary Clinton had to confide in Obama, when she initially turned down the Secretary of State job, that she would not be able to control her husband’s behavior.

Then Haiti collapses, and Bubba is back, in all of his best ways, as a communicator, humanitarian, leader of the world. On Wednesday, Bill Clinton was all over cable television, explaining, rallying, consoling. He gave an extended address to the United Nations. And he found time to turn in an article for the new issue of TIME. Then Thursday, reports began to trickle out of the White House that President Obama has asked Clinton and George W. Bush to run a new fund-raising push for Haiti.

But the scale of Bill’s return is not simply captured by listing his activity of the past couple days. One must look at the quality of his performance, too. On CNN Wednesday, Wolf Blitzer effectively turned over the Situation Room to Clinton. The transcript is worth reading, though it does not fully capture Clinton’s great powers of communication (without notes) and public empathy:

BLITZER: Mr. President, people all over the world are watching right now. We are being seen on CNN and CNN International in more than 240 countries. Speak first to leaders around the world what you want them to do to help and then speak from your heart to individuals who are simply shaken by what is going on in Haiti right now.

CLINTON: Well, first, to the leaders, I would say, if you have already made a commitment in one of our donors conferences, you need to check and see whether you have fulfilled that commitment. Most countries are way behind on fulfilling it. And I would urge you to fulfill the commitment as soon as possible. And if you can provide any of this emergency help, if you can give us helicopters, if you can give us basic medical supplies, we need that. But, remember, this is going to be a long-term process. Haiti has an economic development plan that the government and the people have embraced.

The rest of us are just helping them to implement it. And I would urge you not to give up on Haiti as a lost cause, because we can get through this. And it is even more important now that we honor the wishes of the Haitian people and the government to help become their partners and liberate them from 200 years of misery. They can still do it.

But first things first. We have got to care for the survivors, identify those who have died, reunite them with their families and deal with these basic problems.

To individuals, I would tell you that these are good people. Yes, Haiti is the poorest country in our hemisphere. Yes, 70 percent of the people or more live on $2 a day or less. Yes, they have had a long and tortured history.

But they are good people. They are survivors. They are intelligent. They thrive in their diaspora communities. They desperately want to reclaim their country and give it a better future. And they need your help now.

A lot of us at the U.N., we believe in them. And a lot of us today are pretty low, because we know that some of our colleagues have died because they believed in Haiti. These people deserve a chance to bury their dead, to heal their wounded, to eat, to sleep, to begin to recover, and they can’t do it just with government help alone.

They need you, too. If you can give $1, $5, $10, you can send it to clintonfoundation.org/haitiearthquake, or you can send it to UNICEF or the CARE or the Red Cross/Red Crescent. We will get that money out. And little donations add up to big amounts.

In the Asian tsunami, 250,000 people died, Americans gave $1 billion. The median contribution was $56. Half the people gave it over the Internet, and that was five years ago — $5 or $10 can make a huge difference.

These people are just like you, and they are hurting now. There are people who are missing their spouses, their children, their brothers, their sisters, their parents. We are going to save as many of them as we can. And with your help, we are going to help them begin again.

Just a few days ago, blogs were circulating new evidence of Bill Clinton’s rumored extramarital dalliances after leaving the White House. He was a piece of history, on the sidelines, watching his legacy erode. Now he is back, doing what he does best, perhaps better than anyone else in world.

To read Clinton’s piece in TIME magazine, visit a newsstand near you, or click here.

Related Topics: Bill Clinton, haiti earthquake, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • nflfoghorn

    Damning and faint praise.

  • freeinpa

    I have never been a Bill Clinton fan and he certainly has more than a few faults. However, he and Bush Sr. have done an outstanding job using their time and status to raise needed money for many worthy causes.

    Whether you sit on the left or right, it is hard to argue with the success of those efforts.

  • Matt

    Could Clinton’s return to international super-stardom make him an even bigger player in the health care debate?

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • spob

    Hopefully, some jerkweed from the UN won’t be calling the US a tightwad this time around.

  • stuartzechman

    Michael Scherer:

    As the new book Game Change reveals…

    That’s really disappointing.
    .
    You’re really going to confer credibility on tabloid garbage like this?
    .
    You don’t think that your professional integrity will suffer as a result?
    .
    OK…

  • constantweader

    Gee, Michael, what happened to the “Bubba Is Back” headline this story sported earlier today? Didn’t you editor think it was classy for a “journalist” to refer to the former President as “Bubba,” especially when he is trying to save the lives of thousands of desperate people? Some editors are really prissy, aren’t they?

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • apr2563

    Michael: I agree with SZ. Everyday brings new expressions of disgust about the sourcing of Game Change. I guess you don’t watch the Colbert Report. As usual, it took a comedy show to do a takedown of the book.
    Some pundits have acknowledged its tabloid presentation yet orgasmically refer to those citations in the book that supports the point they want to make.
    The forward to the book, as Colbert pointed out, states the hypocrisy of the any attempt at accuracy. They can’t even logically defend their break of confidentiality with Harry Reid.
    I make this point in reference to all subjects smeared in the book from Palin to Clinton. As was pointed out by Jason Linken, the authors seemed to have a real need to villainize women: Palin, Clinton, Cindy McCain and Elizabeth Edwards.
    Please, refrain from quoting that book. It has no validity or jounalistic worth.

  • apr2563

    Michael’s greatest skill. Often, as this time, a little to obvious.

  • lordmarbury

    If Bill Clinton has remained out of the spotlight since the election, who was the guy they sent to North Korea?

    Also, Clinton never called Obama a “fairy tale”. He called Obama’s version of his record on Iraq a “fairy tale”.

  • georgiac

    Thanks for that, lordmarbury. The “Clinton called Obama a fairy tale” tale has passed into conventional wisdom, but it was not so. I believe that Senator Obama’s people spun that version and it stuck, not surprisingly.

blog comments powered by Disqus