In the Arena

Trouble in Pakistan

The Obama Administration’s efforts to nudge the Pakistanis into fighting the Afghan Taliban–as opposed to the Taliban who are setting off bombs within Pakistan–seems to be encountering a fair amount of pushback, not just from the military as detailed in this NY Times piece, but also from a skeptical Pakistani public, which believes, as Andrew Sprung writes here, that the US and India are at the heart of the terrorism that has been ripping formerly safe areas of the country. There is also the problem of President Asif Ali Zardari’s withering authority and nonexistent popularity.

All of which adds up to…what? Hard to say at this point. In previous years, a military coup would be imminent. Not this time, though–not so soon after the toppling of the last military dictator, Pervez Musharraf, with the overwhelming support of the Pakistani population. At the highest levels, as the Times reports and my sources confirm, the Pakistani military leadership seems intent on supporting a civilian government for the moment and also is intent upon a close relationship with the U.S….but, at the same time, it is continuing its double game, supporting its Afghan Taliban clients. And the real question is: what about the Army officers at the next level down, the lower-ranking generals and colonels, some of whom are Islamists with close ties to the jihadis? Coups in other countries have been known to come from charismatic lower-ranking officers. If Pakistan continues to spin toward chaos, be prepared for the unthinkable.

Update: More on this subject here by my intrepid colleagues, Tony Karon and Omar Wairich.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, is the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, who Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Obama Stumbles? Why the President’s Right to Talk About Bain

    The meme of the day in journo-world is that President Obama has stumbled at the outset of the general election campaign. The evidence for this? Well, uh, there isn’t very much, really–except that a few Democrats have criticized his campaign’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital and that Obama’s fundraising is merely humongous, instead of obscenely humongous. The two phenomena are linked, of course: Obama isn’t getting the usual haul from Wall Street because he has outrageously–outrageously!–tried to regulate the bankers who did so much to crash the economy in 2008. The handful of Democrats squawking are people who either (a) get money from private equity firms or (b) have retired and joined Mondo Casino. But there is another side to this story:

  • http://www.ghostnote.com Cookie Puss

    Has our continued presence in Afghanistan with no real goal or endgame helped destabilize Pakistan? Kind of like how our presence in Iraq gave Iran more juice than it had before? Good times all around.

  • queencersei

    Seems like the more we try to ‘help’ Pakistan and Afghanistan, the more violant and unstable their countries become. Is it any wonder that the populations of those countries do not want us around?

  • pintortwo

    You indicate that the Pakistani public is reluctant to fight the Afghan Taliban and feels skeptical of US influence in the region. Given too that military attacks inevitably cause civilian casualties and refugees, would not the proposed “surge” in Afghanistan make Pakistan less stable, cause socio-economic turmoil, grow resentment of American interference and increase sympathy for the Taliban? In other words, how is it that increased US pressure on the Afghan Taliban will not make “the unthinkable” more likely?

  • pintortwo

    what about the Army officers at the next level down, the lower-ranking generals and colonels, some of whom are Islamists with close ties to the Taliban?
    .
    Be fair, please. These individuals do not have ties, or any desire for association, with jihadis. The Taliban fight us because we are in their country, they have no intention of creating terror in the US.
    .
    So yes, how will these officers be effected by US attacks on the Taliban?

  • http://www.hotdesivideo.com/blog/?p=635 Trouble in Pakistan – Swampland – TIME.com | Desi Blog

    [...] original here: Trouble in Pakistan – Swampland – TIME.com Posted in News Tags: a-fair-amount, afghan, afghan-taliban-as, bombs-within, [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus