UPDATE: Guess Who Came To Dinner?

At least two people who weren’t invited, we now know. Just how reality-TV-wannabes Michaele and Tareq Salahi managed to crash last week’s first State Dinner (See TIME’s photos here.) has been the subject of back-to-back front page stories in the Washington Post and another one in the New York Times. The story raises some serious questions about White House security, given how close they got to the President and the Indian Prime Minister, as well as so many other high-ranking government officials.

As of now, the Secret Service is blaming the debacle on a breach at a single checkpoint, though they are being vague on the details. My own experience with these things is both limited and dated. Back in 1999, I attended a similar dinner the Clintons threw in honor of Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji. (According to the Washington Post account of that dinner, I got invited under the “White House always throws a bone to reporters who follow the president” exemption. Whatever. I was very, very happy to be there for what turned out to be a very cool experience.)

But what I know from that dinner tells me there were a number of places where things went wrong:

The first thing to know is what makes entering the White House for one of these big social events different from, say, getting in for a routine interview or a briefing. For state dinners, invited guests are allowed to drive a car up to the building. The guards go over your vehicle, including putting something that looks like a gigantic dental mirror under it, and then you are sent up the driveway to the White House, where a uniformed military officer takes your keys and parks your car.

According to NBC’s Brian Williams, the Salahis got caught in that initial screening. This from today’s NYT story:

In interviews broadcast on NBC on Thursday, Mr. Williams said the couple’s vehicle was turned away, adding, “Actually the first ring of Secret Service security had worked.”

“After their vehicle was turned away, they hopped out,” Mr. Williams said. “What attracted our attention was there was at least one camera trailing them. And a makeup woman got out and fixed the woman’s hair and then started powdering the man’s forehead.”

Okay, the checkpoint worked. But why did they then just let this unauthorized couple go on their way? Shouldn’t they have been at least a little suspicious that they would try to get in through another gate? (Hint to Secret Service: The fact that they then got out of their car, and did a quick touch-up, suggests that they were not planning to go home and spend the rest of the evening watching TV and doing laundry.)

According to The Times and other reports, the Salahis apparently managed to get in at a pedestrian entrance around the block. (This gets to another difference between this kind of event and a more routine visit; at a social event, you are not issued a little tag to wear around your neck identifying you as being there for an appointment.)

The Washington Post speculated:

A savvy pair of crashers, dressed to the nines, might arrive on foot at the visitors’ entrance, announce their names — then express shock and concern when the security detail at the gate failed to find them on the guest list. On a rainy night like Tuesday, with a crowd of 300-plus arriving, security might have lost track of or granted a modicum of sympathy to a pair who certainly looked as though they belonged there. If their IDs didn’t send up any red flags in the screening process, they would be sent through the magnetometers and into the White House.

This does not at all square with my experiences at those magnetometers. I’ve shown up any number of times when someone hadn’t sent the gate the required information–full name, birthdate and Social Security number–and (believe me, I’ve tried) whining has never gotten me anywhere. Sympathy is not their strong suit; nor should it be.

I’m not the only one has that impression, according to the NYT:

Representative Peter T. King, the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, called for a Congressional investigation, saying in an interview Thursday that he was shocked at the lack of security at the White House on Tuesday night. Since 2003, the Secret Service has been part of the Department of Homeland Security.

“Obviously, somebody dropped the ball,” said Mr. King, of New York. “I mean, you’re talking about the president of the United States and the vice president and a powerful world leader, the prime minister of India.” The prime minister, Manmohan Singh, was the guest of honor.

Mr. King said he had seen people turned away from similar White House events, including a congressman who brought his daughter instead of his wife, whose name was on the list. He also raised concerns about the Secret Service’s assertion that Mr. Obama was safe because all guests passed through metal detectors.

“The fact they went through the magnometer is incidental,” he said. “They could have had anthrax on them. They could have grabbed a knife from the dining room table.”

Is it possible that the couple was cleared in for some other purpose, and by some office other than the Social Office? If that were the case, they would have been on the list to be cleared. But their formal clothes should have set off a red flag of their intended destination in the building.

Now we get to the part that I really don’t understand. Their entry to the pre-dinner reception was announced. You can see the video here. (Michaele, in particular, seems to be treating this as a Hollywood red carpet walk, stopping and posing and stopping and posing. People in Washington generally don’t.) What happened here? Wasn’t someone standing there with a roster? (My dim recollection is that someone was when I attended that dinner in 1999.) * update below

And once they were in, shouldn’t all the happy snaps with people who didn’t know them (seen here on Michaele’s Facebook page) have made someone think, what’s up with these folks? Again, this is not typical behavior at these kinds of events.

The couple is not saying anything, though their attorney issued a statement through their publicist that “states emphatically that the Salahis did not ‘crash’ this event. We look forward to setting the record straight very soon.”

And I look forward to hearing their explanation, too. Word is, they’ll be on Larry King on Monday night. A word of advice: Get there early. That security at CNN can be a real bear.

UPDATE: In response to my inquiry about how they got announced: No one is speaking on the record. But my understanding is that guests just wrote their names and titles on a card, and handed it to the emcee.

Related Topics: michaele salahi, real housewives, reality tv, state dinner, tareq salahi, white house gate crashers, Barack Obama, White House
  • Latest on Swampland

    Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images

    Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception

    In the face of mounting pressure from Catholic leaders and politicians, the White House on Friday tweaked its position on contraception coverage mandates in the Affordable Care Act. Rather than require large religious institutions like Catholic colleges and hospitals to provide employees with free health insurance coverage for contraception, insurance companies themselves will have to pick up the tab.

    Romney: 'I Misspoke'HuffPost Politics

    Ben Garvin / For the Washington Post / Getty Images

    The Beginning of the End for No Child Left Behind

    President Obama granted 10 states relief from the strictest requirements of No Child Left Behind on Thursday, in a move he said combines “greater freedom with greater responsibility.” That freedom is provided in the form of a waiver that releases the states from having to meet targets education officials have long complained are too rigid and impossible to meet, including one key provision that required all students at public schools to be proficient in math and reading by 2014.

  • kbanginmotown

    Me guess: They showed up with decon’s Sweet Onion Casserole and were waved through…

  • constantweader

    Ironically, Napolitano, who oversees the Secret Service, was busy at an airport photo op pretending she was a TSA employee. Maybe she should have been checking up on presidential security instead. I agree with Peter King — anthrax was my first thought, too. There are plenty of crazy people who clean up right nicely.

    BTW, the Times of India has run three stories on the gate-crashers.

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • michaelfury

    “The story raises some serious questions about White House security”

    As does this story:

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/the-protection-racket/

  • michaelfury

    “They could have had anthrax on them.”

    Why does that sound like a threat, Mr. King?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/culture-of-deception/

  • williamloiry

    I have been involved in developing homeland security since 1998 and it is a pleasure for me to confirm that Tareq and Michaele Salahi are fine public servants who give of themselves selflessly. They both were a major sponsor of The Presidential Inauguration VIP Ball and Conference in January (www.inauguration2009.tv) and now I am glad to see that they are with our leaders making a difference. — William Loiry

  • Cliff

    Wonkette does this gossip rag crap far better.

  • FlownOver

    I think we can bring back a semi-retired acronym for this: BFD.

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    I hate that the Secret Service is taking all the fall for this. The White House Social office was just as inept, a) by not putting a Social office rep beside the Secret Service to confirm invitations, and b) by not having a roster beside the military aide who announced the folks.

    The fact that the White House is letting the Secret Service take the complete fall for this, without acknowledging their own responsibility and ineptitude is sad and unproductive.

    The Secret Service is on the whole a very professional organization, and maligning their reputation through this incident, especially since White House officials should share in the responsibility, is unfortunate.

  • http://jschwendler.wordpress.com jschwendler

    In the Spring of 1970 while on my lunch break as an 18 year old student at a local broadcasting school around the corner, I walked right in to the White House.
    On the East side there was an unguarded opening in the steel picket fence. I walked up to the door and let myself in. There was long staircase with red carpet in front of me and believe me, I was tempted to go up. But I spent about ten minutes wandering that bottom floor looking at all the wall paintings and items on the table. Then, I turned and walked out. At no time did I see anyone nor, apparently, did anyone notice me. Just when I thought those days were over….

  • roperbk

    As a former Secret Service Agent, I’m astounded that these losers got into a state dinner. Obviously the USSS’s ability to provide security while under the Homeland Security Dept. and Ms. Napolitano has been severly deminished. The buck stops at the top, time to get a new head of Homeland Sec.

  • Ivy_B

    Wonder if the Chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee will hold a hearing about this?

  • http://ski3r.wordpress.com ski3r

    We have become experts at passing the proverbial buck and NOT taking responsibility for any of our actions. To Wit – I read in a related story today that the SS is planning on prosecuting the “party crashers”. Uh – that’s kinda like Chris Dodd & Barney Frank saying we MUST get to the bottom of the mortgage crisis while THEY THEMSELVES were the 2 Senators in charge of Banking Oversight!! Look in the mirror dudes. The SS (of whomever is the actual security force “in charge”) should be thanking the crashers for showing them the gaping security holes. It’s like using an expert burglar or internet hacker to attempt a break-in. But NO, let’s not take the responsibility for our in-actions, let’s arrest them. This is once again government sleight-of-hand; “look over here on my right side while I surreptitiously hide the quarter with my left hand.” Sorry the buck does stop with YOU. Fix the problems or get out of the way and real Americans, who are once again waking-up, will step-in to take care of it ourselves.
    Skier Out

  • vega007

    There seems to be a lot of assuming and jumping to conclusions here. Let’s not pull the trigger on the Salahis and paint them as some “wanna-bes” or some “White House Party crashers” just yet. Let’s gather all the facts (ie. hear what they have to say on LKL) and then take it from there. I have nothing but love for Michaele and Tareq and will continue to provide my friendship to them. I believe 100% that they were invited and cleared to attend. Perhaps the mistake was made on somebody else’s part.

  • mxyzptlk1953

    I think if the President, Vice President (who he stood next to) or Indian PM had been attacked with a knife, had their neck broken, or carotid artery pierced with eyeglasses (have you seen Godfather 3?), you might not say that.

  • http://dalewalk.wordpress.com dalewalk

    Where was it you read that the S.S. is taking no responsibility? I believe they’ve made it pretty clear that some head(s) will roll and the appropriate changes will be made to prevent it from happening again.
    As for the crashers, it seems you believe they should be rewarded for their cunning and deceitful breach and they should bear no responsibility?

    Since you started your comment with the statement ‘We have become experts at passing the proverbial buck…’ I’m lost as to what your point is ski3r.

  • classichorse

    Who is William Loiry? He says, “They both were a major sponsor of The Presidential Inauguration VIP Ball and Conference in January.” I would ask Mr. Loiry, “At whose expense?” The list of creditors? Whether they are “…fine public servants” and “give of themselves selflessly” or not, the fact is that they were not invited to the State Dinner. To make matters worse, everyone appears worried about metal detectors and anthrax….what about ricin etc?
    While we’re beginning to understand these people, let’s assume they do give of themselves “selflessly.” Where, when, to whom…do they do benefits, do they contribute to charity with time, money and organization for which they are not paid? Or do they simply do charity work to promote themselves?
    Forget the Secret Service for one moment! Has the IRS looked at the deductions these people have made for all their business ventures?
    Finally, part of the polo playing community? What club, what team, what are they rated, do they have a social membership or playing membership, do they ride horses, do they raise horses, do they have a barn on their property, do they have farm help, what kind of farm help etc.
    Let’s be clear about one last thing. As Henry Kissinger may have said, “[Blondes are] the ultimate aphrodisiac.” Blondes get in everywhere and anywhere they want!

  • http://zg48.wordpress.com zg48

    There is reason for great concern regarding “crashers” Our country was again compromised–remember 9/11. The house was not being watched and security protocol was null. The whole incident needs no comedy but everyone involved need to be on lock down. Even Brian Williams felt there was something unsettling regarding these professional crashers. Photos are surfing everywhere how these “illegal and suspect crashers have been in the social light” Too close to the president, vice president and families. At the point of entrance in the driveway–they should have been swooped on and detained! Sooo, if I’m in the neighborhood of the white house, it raining and I’m dressed to the ninghs and I want to attend a highly secured function, I just say that I was invited passed through the metal detector and I’m in….remember 9/11. This needs to be investigated and resolved–donot allow them on the “Larry King Show or The Desperate Houswives of Orange County” Lets not mock our country!

  • emkay007

    I think they paid their way into the dinner and will reap the rewards by selling their story on some TV show.

  • impennyh

    I agree that the party crashers should be held accountable. And it’s a lesson to be learned by security. They certainly dropped the ball. On another matter, I would like to know why reporters such as Katie Couric and Brian Williams were invited as honored guests. They are reporters! I can’t believe that their invitations won’t reflect on the way they report anything about the Obama administration.
    Doesn’t anyone out there think that it’s wrong?

  • chasingloiry

    William Loiry. What a joke.

    Given that you YOURSELF have ZERO integrity and absolutely NO ETHICS – (you do recall that you stole thousands of dollars from me for your phony event which never happened and you refused to return the money…?) — I don’t know that YOU can actually vouch for anyone, you slime ball.

    Anyone who chooses to do business with you or your sham of a “business” is a moron. You are, in my opinion, a con artist in a cheap suit and the equivalent of an ambulance chaser with your opportunistic events (many of which never happen, while you pocket the money).

  • chasingloiry

    William Loiry. What a joke.

    Given that you YOURSELF have ZERO integrity and absolutely NO ETHICS – (you do recall that you stole thousands of dollars from me for your phony event which never happened and you refused to return the money…?) — I don’t know that YOU can actually vouch for anyone, you slime ball.

    Anyone who chooses to do business with you or your sham of a “business” is a moron. You are, in my opinion, a con artist in a cheap suit and the equivalent of an ambulance chaser with your opportunistic events (many of which never happen, while you pocket the money).

  • http://ski3r.wordpress.com ski3r

    dalewalk: The point is quite simple. INSTEAD of IMMEDIATELY looking at What Went Wrong with security procedures (which they certainly will eventually do) CBS radio reported that the SS immeduately jumped to discuss prosecuting the “bad guys” who broke in. It is the timing of the actions that they are discussing taking that is the problem. The early reporting seemed to imply that Security forces were blaming others BEFORE blaming themselves. At no time did I say that the crashers should be rewarded for their actions (please read it again) -they do need to be treated like the criminals they are; I was incensed that the blame game was beginning in the wrong place, as usual with our elected officials of both sides of the aisle. The analogy of comparing what the crashers did to a hired hacker was really to show just how bad the security procedures were. These crashers were not hired security thwarters just a bunch of celebrity-seeking bums. Imagine what a real security threat COULD have done.

  • williamloiry

    Dear so-called “chasingloiry”. My reputation is stellar. The only person being chased is you. My lawyers are preparing to sue you for extortion, defamation, tortuous business interference, and a long list of other offenses. Extortion is also a criminal offense.

  • timduktu

    As easy as walking into the US from Mexico. Which makes me wonder why these 2 would be prosecuted when illgal aliens are not? Maybe if they were Mexican?
    Somebody better be reviewing the security arrangments–like him or not he is the POTUS and needs the utmost protection.

  • sacredh

    Lots of new faces. I’m guessing somebody posted a link elsewhere.

  • chkjdy

    If you would like to know the answer to the question of who dropped the ball at the White House during the resent Security Breach look no further than the person who is in charge of Homeland Security. She did her best to destroy the State of Arizona as Governor. She and her girl friend, which by the way she took to Washington with her, live in a fantasyland called the Alternate Universe where everybody is honest and nobody is bad or has evil thoughts. I’ll wager if you were to pole those who work for her has more than once heard that phrase. It was used in Arizona so much it became a joke. More than once it has been refered to, as another universe next to the real one, which is going in the same direction but dosent exist except in the minds of those who wish it were real.

  • sacredh

    Did you two used to date or something? I detect bitterness.

  • sacredh

    I would love to pole those who work for her. Are you sure she won’t mind?

  • rmg5441

    I certainly agree, however there should have been, if CBS & NBC represented perhaps personnel from say Fox, CNN & ABC. The media play’s a hugh role in the WH. The head of the security should be held accountable until every detail has been examined over and over. “Damn the Defiant” full speed ahead to uncover the truth!!!

  • Cliff

    I was just about to remark on how weird it is for all these new handles to show up talking about the Secret Service.
    .
    We even have a little soap opera being acted out by Mr. Loiry & Co. (Perhaps they can get in touch with Lawyer Mommy and work out a crossover event.)

  • theotherjimmyolson

    Help me out here. It is somehow a crime to enter the white house after getting cleared by security? Sounds like some one wants to punish these to for embarrassing the SS and other security workers. We should of course be thanking these people, whatever their motives for showing the world that a breach of security is possible. After we do that, of course the people responsible should fall on their swords.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Ha! I highly doubt that if either of you are who you say you are, you would freely be discussing your litigation plans on an online forum. I’m just saying…

  • gysgt213

    In a just world these people would receive zero attention beyond their court apperance, but we all know what kind of world this country has become,.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Seriously! We’ve got alleged homeland security developers, former Secret Service agents, personal friends of the Salahis, and one guy claiming to have waltzed into the White House himself in 1970…

  • knowdalaw

    I agree with you that the Secret Service is taking the fall for this. The White House does have some explaining to do.

    If these two guests were not invited, where did they sit and at what table?

    Why didn’t the The White House Secretary, Ms. Rogers, have a place and name sitting chart or cards so that everyone would know who is at each table?

    Why didn’t Ms. Rogers notice they were not invited and ask them to leave?

    Why didn’t First Lady who had the list of guest not walk over there and ask them to leave?

    If only 300 were invited, where was the seat for 301 and 302? If every one attended as expected, there would have been a need to add an extra table or chair, right?

    While the White House asks these questions to the Secret Service, someone needs to ask the First lady and White House Secretary these questions.

    Either someone in the White House does not know proper etiquette or they disregarded that major social aspect.

    What is really going on at the White House if they do not know how to plan a party and recognize uninvited guests immediately? The last checkpoint was the table they sat. The best host would immediately recognize and imbalance.

    It just gets me that the White House does not know how to seat people. Humph…Humpf…humpf!

  • palininatowel

    One time in college we had uninvited guests crash a party. They drank our beer and were rude to some friends so we threw them out… through the front window.

  • knowdalaw

    Amazing. I wish they would put you on television to tell this short story. Thanks for sharing!

  • http://2poor4politics.wordpress.com 2poor4politics

    OMG…..My Jaw dropped to the floor when I heard that Tareq and his wife were the ones who pulled this off.

    Having lived in the area where they do….I have had more than one occassion to meet this charming yet very slick and self agrandizing couple

    Tareq owns Oasis winery which has in the past 10 or so years been the “new money” winery destination for any and all DC wine crowd under 35. He was more suited to the “wanna be ” Miami crowd than the DC crowd. Hes slick and charming and has spent millions buying his way into DC society. As for the Polo crowd, I’m not sure he’s ever even touched a horse although I’m sure he’s borrowed a Rolls to do the stable tour.

    Anyway….enough about them…As for the secret service, I have worked with many of them and am very sorry for their mistake as the press will eat them alive for it. The agents whom I have worked with are very responsible and accurate and I’m sure that the specific agent (s) will be dealt with harshly as the black eye will not be recieved well by their co workers

    I COMPLETELY understand how this could happen for the simple fact that Tareq probably made the agents feel as though he would destroy their entire family if he was disgraced by their incompetence

    all the way around… a very unfortunate set of circumstances

    I am VERY confident that nobody was in danger of anything more than flash burn from the camera hogs or a case of annoyance via Tareq’s over inflated sense of self worth

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    Only one time? :)

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    Actually, having learnt more about this, while I do think that the social office can learn from this by placing a staffer by the officers in charge of security, they did seem to take some precautions.

    [ A senior administration source told NBC News that staff from the office were nearby, working "between the checkpoints" in the case of problems.

    In addition, the source said, social office staff were "available at a computer to double check if someone is not on the list and also to enter them into the system for processing if for some reason they should be allowed in and are not on the list."

    "A senior law enforcement source also confirmed what two White House staff sources earlier told NBC News, that the Salahis were not "waved in" or had their names manually entered into the White House computer to gain entry."]

    As far as dinner goes, the Social Secretary’s office did have assigned seating which is why the gatecrashers never made it to the dinner. they may have taken pics, but it seems like they didn’t have a seat b/c it was assigned seating.

    So yeah, everyone can learn from this, but Secret Service does seem to bear the larger burden of responsibility.

  • palininatowel

    Only once through the front window. After that, we thought better of it and simply hurled the interlopers from the top of the front porch stairs.

  • http://morninglight.wordpress.com/ mL

    “Why didn’t the The White House Secretary, Ms. Rogers, have a place and name sitting chart or cards so that everyone would know who is at each table?”

    They did have assigned seating. The crashers never got to sit at the dinner table.

  • palininatowel

    When I worked for the Gallup Organization, I often asked at company parties, “Would someone take my pole?”
    .
    Invariably, someone would slap me after that.

  • palininatowel

    Oh, that Tareq! He is such a cad! Did you know that most of the time when it looks like he’s wearing an expensive silk turtleneck, he’s really wearing just a cheap, rayon dickey?

  • http://mwilsons.wordpress.com mwilsons

    The fault is of the white house social office. They didn’t have someone at the gate to check the list when their names didn’t come up at the gate. Under Bush someone was at the gate and if there was a problem the list was checked. Under Obama the person stayed in between the checkpoints and when the secret service waived them through thinking they would be checked at the next checkpoint they were in. There was a lack of communication between the white house social staff and the secret service. So Obama’s social staff’s plan was to have the person in between the checkpoints and they had a set up with people checking at a computer if there was a problem. The problem was that they weren’t at the gate like they should have been.

    The white house social staff is still not realizing their mistake in not having the person at the gate. They are saying the person at the gate couldn’t check all the invitations and recognize all the people. What the white house social staff doesn’t recognize is they needed someone there to check the list when the secret service agent didn’t find their name on the list and then for the social staff rep to call to the social staff office and double check on the computer to see if they are on the guest list.

    Obama’s head of social staff is desiree rogers who was in charge of the lottery in illinios and is an obama crony dropped the ball by having a rep in between the checkpoints instead of at the gate.

  • http://jschwendler.wordpress.com jschwendler

    Um, we all do know the word is poll, not pole, right? And, yes, I did walk into the WH during my lunch hour that spring day almost 40 years ago. Times were a lot different then. True story, though.

  • palininatowel

    Musta’ been that crazy dress she was wearing.

  • palininatowel

    Would you take my pole if I asked you nicely?

  • twobraincells

    Okay, so here’s my little fantasy about what we might discover about this fun foray which was completely successful in getting the Salahis the media attention they needed in order to boost their likelihood of getting hired for the Real Housewives of D.C.:

    Take note that the Salahis employ a well-known D.C. entertainment lawyer who himself has pics on his website of him cozying up to prominent folks in (mostly) the music industry. The Salahis and their lawyer also apparently employ the services of the same publicist with a suspiciously alias-y sounding name (and who I think is probably actually an employee at the lawyer’s firm).

    Said lawyer and/or publicist likely know a few reasonably well-placed people in D.C. who know people on the White House staff, a couple of phone calls are made, assurances are given “oh, gosh, it’s just a fun photo op for a couple of local philanthropists who actually can’t stay for the whole dinner, yadda, yadda” (and/or a favor is called in), and someone on the White House staff says “sure, okay, I’ll send down a post-it saying that they can be let in the pedestrian gate but definitely NOT seated for dinner.” Et voila!

    I’m pretty sure that the Secret Service agents on duty didn’t decide to let the Salahis in of their own accord. Someone with credibility told an agent at a particular post that it was okay and he/she followed instructions.

    But I could be entirely wrong …

  • sacredh

    Have I ever told anybody about my old job with the Secret Cervix?

  • sacredh

    Janet’s a carpet muncher? Seriously? Cross your legs and hope to die?
    .
    These people may not be who they claim to be, but they are excellent snark fodder.

  • kathy

    It’s a felony to lie to a federal officer.

  • kathy

    I’m actually a lot more disturbed by the Secret Service insisting that there was no threat because the couple went through a magnetometer than I am by their crashing the dinner to begin with. It suggests that the spokesman hasn’t a clue what constitutes a threat. Apparently we’re all safer on airplanes than the President and foreign leaders are in the White House.

    Back at the inauguration I read a story (NYTIMES mag? Boston globe mag? Don’t remember where) about someone who was a friend of one of the drivers at the inauguration, and he had asked (her, I think) if she’d like to drive too. She said “sure!” and was assigned a car to drive people to the inauguration (Colin Powell maybe?). No checking of any kind. I was appalled at the time, but assumed the secret service was sort of keeping an eye on things at the White House.

    I hope these people get the book thrown at them for lying to a federal officer. This was a serious breach of security, and they’re the ones who breached it.

  • kathy

    KT – as it happens, I too have been to the White House by invitation, as a person whose craft was being displayed. Once was after 2001. I was part of a group, and we had to present our invitation, identification (but I think that was just a driver’s license), purse searched, and go through the magnetometer.

    The interesting thing is that we could bring guests, and I brought my nephew who lives in the DC area. But we didn’t have to give the names of anybody we were bringing, in advance. I’m thinking it’s possible for somebody to have claimed to be with a family without anybody checking that all that carefully.

    We were given a tour of the public rooms, but we were pretty much free to wander around them. The secret service were there, but only a couple for a group of 40 or so, and we were in all the rooms at once, after the formal part of the tour.

  • brianinlosangeles

    Isn’t Senator Lieberman from the 51st state (Israel) in charge of Homeland Security? Maybe he should conduct a congressional investigation of his Aetna/Cigna bought ass.

  • donchild

    If this was an “audition” for reality TV, then I would hope to see charges against not only the gate crashers, but the TV show producer and the network that sponsored them (if indeed they have sponsors) … if for nothing else, then try identity theft for impersonating a legitimate guest. If there was a fault with the SS, then of course they also need to address that internally.

  • kathy

    I might be wrong about not having to give guests’ names in advance. Might have had to give them to our group leader. I wouldn’t have thought twice about it, since I knew who was coming with me, and it’s a long time ago now…

  • pilot22a

    So, these people went to a party that you and I and they paid for. They were invited in and spent an enjoyable evening.

    Don’t blame these harmless people when the Secret Service is to blame for allowing them access. The SS is embarrassed, and rightfully so. It’s they who owe the president and his family an apology.

  • palininatowel

    I don’t know… I find these types of reality TV attention whores to be particularly annoying. Kind of like Balloon Boy’s dad.
    .
    I think it would be kind of enjoyable to see these self-centered self-promoters spend three months in the slammer.

  • kathy

    pilot22a – you’re kidding, right? It’s fine for anyone to try to dupe the secret service, and if they get away with it they aren’t to blame for anything themselves?

  • http://zg48.wordpress.com zg48

    This dangerous error of protection still comes to the responsibility of the Secret Service/Homeland Security (SS). Not on the invited list–authorities immediately should have been called and the “crashers” should have been arrested. It didn’t matter at the point of entrance the SS-thought that the “crashers” would be checked out by the next point of entrance! SS are to know! Looking at the pictures–the “crashers” could have done great harm! Who knows what harm has been done. Our security was breached and I feel that it could be breached while our President and dignitaries are traveling internationally in controversial countries. Remember when not one but two shoes were thrown at former president Bush? If he hadn’t ducked, he would have been wounded. Our security was there then or were they there?

  • michaelfury

    How can we know the dancer from the dance?

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/movers-and-shakers/

  • http://zg48.wordpress.com zg48

    The Secret Service was given the list. Obviously not to be edited–writing in. When the “crashers” walked up the pedestrician way for entrance–no name no entrance and at that the point they should have been detained.

  • http://mwilsons.wordpress.com mwilsons

    It was the responsibility of the social staff to have someone at the gate. Going to the white house for parties is different. Normally you have to be in a computer system to enter the white house if you are a reporter or going to the white house in normal circumstances. That is why it is important for the social staff to be at the gate because they are in charge of the list and they can then double check back at the office if there is a problem.

  • http://mwilsons.wordpress.com mwilsons

    I also don’t get why an Obama administration official said that it wouldn’t be possible for someone from the social office to check all the invitations and have to recognize all the guests. Why couldn’t they have a social staff person out there to check if each guest had an invitation. That is more a job for the social staff than for the secret service. Then if a guest doesn’t have an invitation and they aren’t recognized someone can be called out to check if that person is really supposed to be there.

    That happens usually when a person tries to enter the white house and there is a problem a white house employee goes out and sees if the person is who they say they are. That is besides the fact that they aren’t even on the list and if that is double checked on the social staff computer system then they don’t get in anyway.

    Which checkpoint do they give their social security information and date of birth. If it was the second checkpoint you would think there would be a list there.

    Also why isn’t a social staffer at the entrance when they give their names to be announced. Why do they just write their names down and give it to the marine on guard.

    The whole setup by the social staff is so amatuer. At a local club they check for invitations and if you are on the list they don’t stand in between checkpoints they stand at the entrance. At a local club if you were announced they would check if you were on the list. The whole thing is pathetic.

  • http://mwilsons.wordpress.com mwilsons

    I was looking at celebrities coming in for an MSNBC party in DC. Everyone there was checked on a list and had to show their invitations to a staffer of the party. This isn’t rocket science.

  • http://mwilsons.wordpress.com mwilsons

    White House originally said that the couple couldn’t have been on the receiving line because you needed a name card to be on that line. Yet on politico they have a picture right now of the couple on the line greeting the president with the indian pm off to the side. I haven’t seen an explanation for the white house for this. Why wasn’t a staffer from the social secretary’s office staffer at the front of the line to make sure they had a name card to be able to greet the president.

    I guess they won’t be releasing a picture of the couple greeting the indian pm. This was some deal for the couple normally at a fundraiser you have to spend big money to get your picture with the president even though she has already had one picture with the president before this.

    Also the setup was to get your seating card then when you were walking in towards then tent to get a seating chart.

    It would probably have been a better setup to have a social secretary staffer at the table where you are picking up your seating card to be there to give you a seating chart. Then have another staffer right there to make sure you pick up your seating card before you enter the tent on the south lawn. It didn’t seem like anyone was checking to see if you would pick up your seating card.

    The white house is putting all the blame on the secret service when the social staff’s office has a lot of blame to share.

  • 53_3

    I’m not interested in assigning blame, just fixing the problem. Somebody slipped, we all know that and whoever was lax will tighten up and plug this loophole.
    .
    There are a LOT of GOP crackpots out there that would have loved to have been there – to assassinate him…

  • http://botd.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/top-posts-1312/ Top Posts « WordPress.com

    [...] UPDATE: Guess Who Came To Dinner? At least two people who weren’t invited, we now know. Just how reality-TV-wannabes Michaele and Tareq Salahi [...] [...]

  • http://dc.metblogs.com/2009/11/30/white-house-party-crashers/ Party Crashers: The Complete Story On The White House’s Uninivited Guests | Washington D.C. Metblogs

    [...] to Time, the couple drove up to the White House gates (which is allowed during State Dinners) and were [...]

  • chasingloiry

    Your reputation is FAR from stellar given the long history you have of contracting services and not paying for them, not paying employees and stealing people’s money for events you never hold. The long list of “unpaid judgments” against you alone – all public record, Loiry – would certainly tarnish that imaginary stellar reputation.

    I would LOVE to meet you in a court room. Yet, you’ve been ducking my subpoena for over a year now – and a large number of other peoples too, I understand. I have a long, long list of people who have been wanting justice from you for many years who will be so excited to participate.

    Then you can explain how I could “extort” the money you stole from me.

    I would enjoy any publicity your ridiculous case would bring….then many, many more people can be forewarned about you and your so-called-stellar reputation. I have all of my papers ready. I can see the headlines now “William Loiry Steals Thousands From Woman, Then Sues Her. Has Long History of Unethical Dealings”

    And I could prove every word of it. Please, please, PLEASE meet me in a court of law. My attorney has been salivating at the thought of it. I get goosebumps at the idea of you, me and a trial. FINALLY.

    http://williamloiryequityinternational.blogspot.com

  • williamloiry

    Dear so-called “chasingloiry”: I refute and deny all of your defamatory and ridiculous accusations. As far as “ducking” your imaginary subpoena, I was taking care of my sick father this year, who recently died. At the same time, I was a victim of your nationwide nasty campaign. You can count on seeing my lawyers in court.

  • williamloiry

    Awesome CNN “Reliable Sources” interview this morning with Diane Dimond about how the media got the Salahi White House story all wrong. It confirms my defense of Michaele and Tareq, which I publicly wrote about less than 24 hours after the White House dinner. Time for apologies to the Salahis.

blog comments powered by Disqus