Did David Plouffe Wear A Wire?

I’ve been in the quote scribbling business now for more than a decade, and I am consistently humbled by just how hard it is to get right. I can be sure I heard something correctly, even just a sentence, and the tyranny of just a few seconds between hearing and scribbling will mangle the result. Compare my delayed notes to the audio tape, and I will find that I have misplaced a “the” for an “an,” mangled verb construction or misplaced an adjective.

These hard lessons make Obama For America Campaign Manager David Plouffe’s new book–excerpted this week in TIME–all the more amazing. This guy doesn’t just claim to remember short quotes verbatim; he remembers whole paragraphs spoken in late night phone calls in the heat of a sleepless campaign. Here is how Plouffe recalls one after-hours phone call between himself, Obama and senior adviser David Axelrod.

We conferenced Barack in. “So?” he asked. “What’s the deal?” We told him we agreed with the speech but that it was going to be hard to put it together.

“Tonight is Friday — well, Saturday morning,” I said. “We have to give this speech no later than Tuesday. You have a full schedule in Pennsylvania the next three days. It has already been publicized. If we start canceling events, it will fuel the impression that we’re panicked and our candidacy is on the rocks.”

“No, we can’t cancel anything,” Obama interjected. “But I already know what I want to say in this speech. I’ve been thinking about it for almost 30 years. I’ll call [lead campaign speechwriter Jon Favreau] in the morning and give him some initial guidance. And I’ll work on this during downtime in the hotel room each night. Don’t worry. Even if I have to pull all-nighters, I can make this work.”

Either Plouffe was taping the call, keeping meticulous notes, or he has a seriously cracker-jack memory–or he just filled in some of the holes months later with what he thinks was said. No doubt Obama and Axelrod had a chance to read the draft of the book before it went to press, so I doubt that there is anything that will be challenged. Just saying though. That’s a lot of direct quotes.

The direct quotes continue, quite revealingly, when Plouffe recounts his interview with Sen. Joe Biden during the vice presidential selection process.

The [first] meeting started with Biden launching into a nearly 20-minute monologue that ranged from the strength of our campaign in Iowa (“I literally wouldn’t have run if I knew the steamroller you guys would put together”); to his evolving views of Obama (“I wasn’t sure about him in the beginning of the campaign, but I am now”); why he didn’t want to be VP (“The last thing I should do is VP; after 36 years of being the top dog, it will be hard to be No. 2″); why he was a good choice (“But I would be a good soldier and could provide real value, domestically and internationally”); and everything else under the sun. Ax and I couldn’t get a word in edgewise. It confirmed what we suspected: this dog could not be taught new tricks.

Read the whole excerpt here. The book goes on sale November 3.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know, until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, were the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, whom Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • kbanginmotown

    Thursday…no feeding…

  • Ivy_B

    kbang… Are we now applying that to Michael as well? ;)

  • carotexas1

    Michael some people have photographic memory’s.

  • nerdyengineer

    This is stupid.

  • deconstructiva

    “…I am consistently humbled by just how hard it is to get right.”
    Michael, thanks for your humility and your first paragraph, but did you also misplace your “it” / “quotes” / etc. in the first sentence (“…how hard it is to get IT right”)? Don’t kick yourself for lacking a photographic memory. Mozart could transcribe an entire musical piece after hearing it once or twice; we can’t. But do fix your sentence, please.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “This guy doesn’t just claim to remember short quotes verbatim; he remembers whole paragraphs spoken in late night phone calls in the heat of a sleepless campaign.”

    Coming from a guy who heard a commercial “several times” and STILL got it wrong I’m not sure MS is the guy to snark about anyone’s recall.

  • palininatowel

    Michael,

    Maybe the guy is just much better at what is supposed to be your job than you are.

  • palininatowel

    Okay, Michael, what did I just write?

  • greenlyfe

    This is about his memories of the campaign. He may or may not be paraphrasing but this isn’t out of bounds IMO. It’s a memoir of the campaign from his perspective and using dialogue is accepted in a memoir.

    He’s not a journalist and he’s not claiming to be a journalist.

    So I agree w/the above: this was a stupid post.

  • znanab

    I don’t intend to be mean, but Michael I think it may do you a whole lot of good to intern for some time with some seasoned person like my fellow Longhorn Karen T. for a while. I mean, how do you come up with postings like this one? Doesn’t anyone check what you post on this blog? What is this one supposed to be about? You find it strange that a conference call with a presidential candidate during a campaign could be taped? Or that the first interview with the potential VP candidate would include someone or perhaps several people taking detailed notes? What exactly is the important point you are making here?

  • grape_crush

    Either Plouffe was taping the call, keeping meticulous notes, or he has a seriously cracker-jack memory–or he just filled in some of the holes months later with what he thinks was said.

    So? Did you read the book? Does it feel made up? Is the book worth reading? Why? By ‘amazing’, are you referring to Plouffe’s recall or his book?

    Aside from answering those questions, this post of half-baked insinuation and magazine plugging is pretty stupid.

  • kbanginmotown

    Hey Ivy…haha! after Michael’s post went for another 15 minutes without comment during lunch hour, I was beginning to think that the Swamp had figured I meant Scherer!
    .
    Of course, after his nauseating “Well-Tended Money Machine” post yesterday, a comment-less post is deserved….

  • palininatowel

    If anything, Michael’s post sounds like sour grapes.
    .
    I picture Scherer in line at the Pizza-By-The-Slice joint near the office having a conversation like this:
    .

    SCHERER: I’ll have two slices of pepperoni to go.
    .
    PIZZA GUY: Two slices of pepperoni!
    .
    SCHERER: No, not sausage! Pepperoni!
    .
    PIZZA GUY: That’s what I said!
    .
    SCHERER: No, you didn’t!
    .
    PIZZA GUY: I said, “Two slices of pepperoni!”
    .
    SCHERER: Pepperoni, not sausage!
    .
    WOMAN IN LINE BEHIND SCHERER: He said pepperoni.
    .
    SCHERER: I’m a reporter, damn it!
    .
    PIZZA GUY: Get outta’ line, pal. You’re slowing down the line.
    .
    SCHERER: I’m a reporter! Do you hear me! I have the power to ruin you and your greasy little pizza place!
    .
    PIZZA GUY: Next!

  • sacredh

    That was funny. More please.

  • sacredh

    So…if we can’t feed the trolls today, are we going to pile it up on Mike? It seems cruel to me.

  • palininatowel

    I wrote my post from memory. I was behind the woman who was behind Michael.
    .
    Sincerely,
    .
    David Plouffe

  • sacredh

    Every thought in my head, someone else has said.-The Who

  • cfukara

    ” … just how hard it is to get right. I can be sure I heard something correctly ..”

    I know the feeling.

    Even when it is written down, I wonder if I read it right or if that reporter really got it right.
    Take for instance the following headline:
    “Clinton puzzled at USA failure to find al Qaeda leaders

    Did I read that right?

  • stuartzechman

    palininatowel:
    .
    LOL.
    .
    What is his post about?

  • phoenix1964

    Michael are you jonesing for Obama. Actually both Alexrod and Plouffe have told this story multiple time in interviews. Check out CSPAN video library. Plus, I think I would remember something as important as this conversation especially when Plouffe and others thought the Rev. Wright issue could derail all they have worked for over a year.

  • bobell

    Sorry, Decon, but you’ve mis-analyzed the sentence. “It” in “how hard it is to get right” is not a dummy subject but the thing that Michael’s having trouble getting right. Consider the analogous phrase “how hard it is to do.” “It” there is the thing to be done. In Michael’s sentence, “it” is the thing to get right. Your inserted “it” doesn’t make the sentence wrong, just changes it, but the change isn’t a correction. There’s nothing wrong with the sentence as Michael wrote it.
    .
    Others have taken care of commenting on the substance.

  • hellslittlestangel

    Shorter Scherer:

    Not only am I just a stenographer, but I suck at it.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Give me a break Mickey! What political professional worth their salt wouldn’t keep a detailed daily journal of their activities, thoughts, and conversations etc, especially when they are involved with a candidate or project that might have historical significance? What is this some sort of ridiculous equivalent to penis envy — potus envy maybe?
    .
    Journalists are always going around citing polls they are ill equipped to understand let alone interpret and giving political advice as if they are political consultants — now you want to get pissed because someone writes a book you feel is a signal that they have entered into your territory? Well I guess turn around is fair play huh?.

  • kbanginmotown

    Win!

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Of course he could have recorded it very easily by activating their cellphones or other nearby devices. I know you are kidding Scherer, right? :)
    ______

    On a general note:

    Hmmmm…with current technology, recording Obama and anyone else–yes, even those insurgents hidden in caves ensconced in the hills of Afghanistan is a relatively easy– so long as they (the “recordeees”) have a cellphone, computer or other equipment which can be turned into a listening device.

    Read my blog for more information or do a detailed search on 21st century, eavesdropping, roving technology, GPS, tracking and tapping of electronic devices. It is cheap and easy for crooks to obtain this technology to listen, track, follow and break into your site, server, blog or device at anytime. Infact such technology can also be is easily obtained by most people because it is sold on so many sites online and off line.

    Thanks to advanced technology and laws which were meant to be used for National Security, criminals can listen to anyone even your old grandma who resides in Greece can be recorded without her knowledge. :) She can even have her picture taken by a webcam which can be remotely activated.

    Aaaah, technology, so good and helpful for many of us– yet it can be complete bedlam when uncontrolled– and leaves common crooks with an imagined power and invisibility complex because of their ability to use technical criminal adroitness to cloak their criminal acts with a disgusting cover, fueled by craven mendacity.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/criminals-use-technology-to-trackrape-and-kill-innocent-people/

  • sophomore67

    Michael – I’m really surprised by the angry responses to your comment. What you say here seems entirely reasonable to me. Have any of these people ever done professional writing? I’m not a journalist, but as a lawyer I find it necessary – always – to double check recordings and transcripts before sending out a document. The mind plays tricks. And when David Plouffe was advising Barack Obama on the most important decisions of the campaign, I hope and expect he was thinking about what to do, not trying to commit everyone’s remarks to memory.

    I do wonder, though, whether the book contains an explanatory note at the front to say what sources were used and what the quotes reflect. Does Plouffe say they are reconstructed from memory and reflect what the author and others remember, to the best of their ability, as the substance of what was said? That would be an odd convention, but also reasonable and above board.

blog comments powered by Disqus