I Go, You Go, We All Go to Oslo

Unlike Joe, I did think that rejecting the prize could have been an option for Obama. But the President announced in the Rose Garden a few minutes ago that he will accept the award “as a call to action, a call to all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.” And following Joe’s advice, he said of the Nobel Committee’s decision: “I do not view it as recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.”

Does that mean we all get to pass around the medal, like the Stanley Cup?

Full text of Obama’s remarks after the jump:

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
ON WINNING THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

Rose Garden


11:16 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Good morning.  Well, this is not how I expected to wake up this morning. After I received the news, Malia walked in and said, “Daddy, you won the Nobel Peace Prize, and it is Bo’s birthday!”  And then Sasha added, “Plus, we have a three-day weekend coming up.”  So it’s good to have kids to keep things in perspective.

I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee.  Let me be clear:  I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.

To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize — men and women who’ve inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.

But I also know that this prize reflects the kind of world that those men and women, and all Americans, want to build — a world that gives life to the promise of our founding documents.  And I know that throughout history, the Nobel Peace Prize has not just been used to honor specific achievement; it’s also been used as a means to give momentum to a set of causes.  And that is why I will accept this award as a call to action — a call for all nations to confront the common challenges of the 21st century.

These challenges can’t be met by any one leader or any one nation.  And that’s why my administration has worked to establish a new era of engagement in which all nations must take responsibility for the world we seek.  We cannot tolerate a world in which nuclear weapons spread to more nations and in which the terror of a nuclear holocaust endangers more people.  And that’s why we’ve begun to take concrete steps to pursue a world without nuclear weapons, because all nations have the right to pursue peaceful nuclear power, but all nations have the responsibility to demonstrate their peaceful intentions.

We cannot accept the growing threat posed by climate change, which could forever damage the world that we pass on to our children — sowing conflict and famine; destroying coastlines and emptying cities.  And that’s why all nations must now accept their share of responsibility for transforming the way that we use energy.

We can’t allow the differences between peoples to define the way that we see one another, and that’s why we must pursue a new beginning among people of different faiths and races and religions; one based upon mutual interest and mutual respect.

And we must all do our part to resolve those conflicts that have caused so much pain and hardship over so many years, and that effort must include an unwavering commitment that finally realizes that the rights of all Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security in nations of their own.

We can’t accept a world in which more people are denied opportunity and dignity that all people yearn for — the ability to get an education and make a decent living; the security that you won’t have to live in fear of disease or violence without hope for the future.

And even as we strive to seek a world in which conflicts are resolved peacefully and prosperity is widely shared, we have to confront the world as we know it today.  I am the Commander-in-Chief of a country that’s responsible for ending a war and working in another theater to confront a ruthless adversary that directly threatens the American people and our allies.  I’m also aware that we are dealing with the impact of a global economic crisis that has left millions of Americans looking for work.  These are concerns that I confront every day on behalf of the American people.

Some of the work confronting us will not be completed during my presidency.  Some, like the elimination of nuclear weapons, may not be completed in my lifetime.  But I know these challenges can be met so long as it’s recognized that they will not be met by one person or one nation alone.  This award is not simply about the efforts of my administration — it’s about the courageous efforts of people around the world.

And that’s why this award must be shared with everyone who strives for justice and dignity — for the young woman who marches silently in the streets on behalf of her right to be heard even in the face of beatings and bullets; for the leader imprisoned in her own home because she refuses to abandon her commitment to democracy; for the soldier who sacrificed through tour after tour of duty on behalf of someone half a world away; and for all those men and women across the world who sacrifice their safety and their freedom and sometime their lives for the cause of peace.

That has always been the cause of America.  That’s why the world has always looked to America.  And that’s why I believe America will continue to lead.

Thank you very much.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know, until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, were the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, whom Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • http://obamasavedthecountry.wordpress.com Obama Saved The Country, But I Just Don't Care For Him

    I think Republicans like Rush Limbaugh and Michael Steele are correct: Obama has shamed the country by winning one of the highest honors known to man. Like his Olympics failure, this is proof that the world hates him.

    I was disappointed he accepted the award in his speech. He should have given it to Sarah Palin, who TRULY deserved the honor.

  • spob

    Obama has no choice but to accept the award. He could, of course, donate the money to helping Congolese rape victims or some other cause held dear by the people, who, you know, probably deserved it.
    .
    I am not sure that the Nobel Peace Prize is “one of the highest honors known to man”. Yasir Arafat won it. ‘Nuff said.

  • vastwastelander

    spob,
    While I continue to hate you and all you stand for, I find myself agreeing with you yet again. I need to stop doing that . . .

  • sacredh

    “And following Joe’s advice…”

    Did President Obama invite Joe to have breakfast and ask his opinion on what he should do? I’m reading this stuff because I’m having a cup of coffee and killing time (haha) before I go to work. Back to rehab Amy, I suspect a relapse.

  • Ohg Rea Tone

    Consider the vision of the future presented by Bush/Cheney. Contrast that vision with the vision of Barack Obama. It is clear that the Nobel Prize was awarded for having the audacity to hope for a better future for all people. ………………

    http://thefiresidepost.com/2009/10/09/nobel-prize-for-audacity-of-hope/

  • spob

    Well, we have had some agreement in here . . . .
    .
    I presume, of course, that we can re-engage the foodfight once I restart my trollery.
    .
    by the way, vast, can I presume that you think I have a point on the whole l’affaire Jennings.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Amy. I was about to play grammar check but you already fixed that first sentence. When seen as a bet on the future, Obama’s win makes perfect sense. Were we instead supposed to rely on A-jad or Bush …or Arafat… to keep the world safe? Celebrate looking forward instead of looking back. You’ll feel better for it.
    .
    (and btw, Amy, if KT’s out today, would you copy / paste a “1000 words” for us, please? please? thanks)

  • cfukara

    AS “..And following Joe’s advice, ..”

    Really?

  • spob

    Visions? Hmmmm. Bush had a vision of Middle East democracy. Obama’s vision is to legitimize Iranian government thuggery.

  • sacredh

    I apologize for the rehab crack Amy. The Vatican dungeon must have been hell. Having said that, please ask KT for a good “1000 Words” today.
    .
    Your friend in Christ, sacredh.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Hurray, he accepted it! I worried for a minute that he might give it back and apologize! so Woohooo that he kept it and gave a great speech to boot.

    We have some activities scheduled for the weekend, but I will be keeping Fox news close, this is a weekend of wild invective, confusion and imagined witchcraft flowing from the Right wing and it may be record breaking in its virulence.

    Hmmm…. one of the allegations might be that the Nobel committee is trying to force passage of the Healthcare Reform Bill by raising Obama to near iconic status?? Lol
    I can imagine surly faced O’Reilly and Coulter discussing the award. How funny.

    Of course they will be saying he did not deserve the award but who cares? He has it. Oh well!

    For some reason, I am overwhelmed by the desire to stick out my tongue like a kindergartener and say “na na na na na” to the Raging Anti-Obama crew–but seeing as I discourage the kids from doing that… I will try and control that urge.. OR maybe limit it to “na na” instead of the full “na na na na na. :)

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • sacredh

    I’ll go you one better. I’ll drop my pants and give them the full moon salute.

  • cfukara

    Gosh! O say can you see the lurid rocket flares as the neocons and their FOXs, Limbaugh and Joe Wilsons blow their tops!

    Damm … he is not failing… our flag IS still there. .. our country still stands as a beacon …

    … he keeps on going and going and …

  • vastwastelander

    Well, when you allowed that Mitterand’s behavior was worse than Jennings’s, you were starting to make sense. I think that by sharing that little annecdote, Jennings, like Van Jones, was guilty of bad judgment. That doesn’t mean he should be stepping down from anything, and he certainly didn’t do anything criminal. We are in agreement that Mitterand and Polanski defenders and apologists are, frankly, stupid. Their Nietzchean moral relativism demonstrates the side of Europe I want nothing to do with.

  • sy2d

    And following Joe’s advice …

    I see that you are back in the village, Ames. Good to know that Joe is back in the advice dispensing industry. Hopefully, he’s getting paid for it this time. As momma always said: “Bought sense is the best kind.”

  • pierogielunaire

    It’s perfectly appropriate for Obama to say how humbled he is by the award and that he doesn’t expect it. It’s perfectly insane for the punditocracy to be racing to their blackberries to proclaim Obama doesn’t deserve it. And now, for two weeks in a row we have seen dwellers from the magical land of Wingnuttia breathlessly trying to diminish Obama. They are looking smaller and more mean-spirited with each passing day.

  • spob

    Well, only a fool would say that Jennings’ behavior was worse than Mitterand’s. Jennings was guilty of bad judgment–disqualifyingly bad judgment. Trent Lott (rightfully so) lost his job for praising Strom. I’d suggest that anyone with a history of praising NAMBLA founders should not be anywhere near the Department of Education.
    .
    But hey, that’s just me.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Sacred H,

    That is G-R-O-S-S, seriously your post made me want to barf. Mooning Newscasters-
    Yukky Yukky Yukky and G r o s s

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • sacredh

    I just called the bakery and ordered a small cake with “Obama: Prince of Peace” on it. I’m taking it into work this afternoon. They are going to be so torn. Marble cake with chocolate icing, but it praises Obama. Cruel and unusual punishment.

  • spob

    Perhaps, since he was President for all of 11 days when nominations closed, you may want to reconsider your sycophancy.

  • sacredh

    I apologize. I realize now that my actions could be a little hairy.

  • sy2d

    Bush had a vision of Middle East democracy.

    Oh, the comedy!

  • bitterpill8

    ” I did think rejecting the prize could have been an option”…has anyone offered the Nobel Peace prize rejected it?

    For those who point to Arafat: my recollection is that an Israeli, too, was given the award simultaneously? Anyone questioned that side of the award?

    When Bishop Tutu was awarded the prize Afrikaners in South Africa had much the same reaction as our RW folks.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    Yes, hair raising and blinding. Disgusting to imagine. G-R-O-S-S to the highest S.

    And add a loud Eeeeeew (as my neighbor’s daughter is found of repeating)… YUK

    LM :)

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • spob

    Yes he did.

  • spob

    Troll. The thought that this guy didn’t do anything to deserve the Nobel Peace Prize cannot be equated to Afrikaner reaction in RSA.
    .
    I call on the libs in this room to denounce this trollery.

  • cfukara

    ” .. I will try and control that urge….”

    Let it all hung out! A discreet self-indulgence here and there won’t hurt.

    Common, lock that door, pull down the shades, send the kids outdoors, and give us an extra “na na” and then a few more ..

    Feels good. What a summer!

    Unkulunkulu/ Fate/ god(s) gave to us “the Raging Anti-Obama crew” – just so that we can have and appreciate and savor great moments like this …

  • pierogielunaire

    Nominations spob. Nominations. You put the refutation to your… uh… “point” right into your own comment and didn’t even notice. Your grade: z-
    .
    And if we’re going to accuse people of psycohological disorders, how’s your treatment for Stockholm syndrome going? Tell me how wonderful Glenn Beck is again?

  • hotbbq

    Forgive my ignorance, but where or what exactly is this “village”? I presumed people were referring to Greenwhich Village, but I’m missing the connection.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Yasir Arafat, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin shared the prize in 1994.

  • cfukara

    AS: ” .. And following Joe’s advice, ..”

    Hey, Bible gal, you are not dangling a bait that these poor, knee-jerk Swamplanders can’t resist, are you?

    Of course you know that such a trick amounts to sin, don’t you? [ I wonder why she was thrown out of that nunnery ...]

  • spob

    Glenn Beck–listened to him for 10 minutes. I’d rather listen to Hannity for 10 hours (which would be a fate worse than listening to fingernails on chalkboards for 10 hours).

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    “Cfukara”:

    You seem to ave it all planned and worked out in your mind, you do it yourself.
    YOU lock that door, pull down the shades, send the kids outdoors, and provide give “na na” and whatever else you desire and then a few more ..

    Me, I have written what I have and will do nothing further– but since you seem smitten by the remarks Go for it YOURSELF, you are on your own, buddy.

    Good luck and God speed.

    LM :)

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • deconstructiva

    …alas, I suppose giving whining corporate media newscasters the shocker hand gesture is like totally out of the question. Also.

  • rustyreturns

    When the truth is told…
    .

    “I am both surprised and deeply humbled by the decision of the Nobel Committee. Let me be clear: I do not view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments, but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations.

    To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who’ve been honored by this prize — men and women who’ve inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.”

    .
    I am just curious, if the “hopes” and “dreams” of the world are pegged on a man, who has done absolutely nothing save but a few speeches on the world’s dire movements into globalization of a one world government, is this what we can expect for our future?
    .
    The expectations going forward are unbelievably guided towards a path of pure hypocrisy. A man, born in Indonesia, raised by his grandparents in Hawaii, and educated at one of America’s finest institutions wins the Nobel Peace Prize for absolutely no reason what-so-ever, with the exception of being erroneously voted into office by 53% of the American illiterate as President of the United States.
    .
    I guess the encouraging thing is, I heard that Hugo Chavez was their 2nd choice. Perhaps this makes it a little more believable.
    .
    I can’t wait for SNL’s take on this one!!!
    .

  • bitterpill8

    Trollery aside: go back and read the Afrikaans papers such as De Beeld and you will see articles suggesting that Tutu was an enemy of SA, an agent provocateur etc and that the Nobel Committee was engaging in a political act against SA. One of the claims was that Tutu did nothing for SA ( i.e. the apartheid regime) and he was a terrorist.

    I don’t expect you to agree with me; but your attempts at trolling reminds me of fishing. Go for it.

  • pierogielunaire

    Excellent news, spob. Then you will see the sweet sweet irony, in Michael Steele accusing anyone—anyone of not having accomplished anything.

  • bitterpill8

    “born in Indonesia”: really? what’s happened to you Rusty?

  • sacredh

    My moon disgusting? I think not. That puppy’s firm enough to crack walnuts. I’m hurt. Really hurt.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    “Divanoboconstru”

    Give it, no one cares, I am sure–so long as you recognize you are throwing it up your way at yourself as well. Knock yourself up, down and out again.

    LM :)

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • spob

    You won’t get any support for a bozo like Michael Steele from me. Although he’s not as bad as Slow Joe Biden.

  • sacredh

    The village is the movers and shakers in DC and the people who report on them. A slightly inbred, insular group set apart from the rest.

  • deconstructiva

    When Amy was in the UK was she held captive by the Catholics or the Anglicans? Inquisitive minds….

  • vastwastelander

    Where to begin?

    1) Trent Lott resigned from his job so he could open a lobbying firm.

    2) “History of praising NAMBLA founders” is a specious statement . . . did Kevin Jennings say “Wow, NAMBLA and it’s founders sure do good work?” It’s possible to praise one aspect of someone’s work and not agree with others. I’ll admit that I don’t know Kevin Jenning’s full biography, nor do I know what he said in every interview he gave, book he wrote, or discussion he had with a friend. If you’re really on board with drumming people out of office for who they associated with in the past, I’d argue that the tenures of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney would have been a lot shorter.

    It just seems to me that you Republicans want to try and run out the clock on the entire Obama administration by “demanding” resignations, stalling with procedural votes on healthcare, and b!tching and moaning about Nobel Prizes. And, while that may be a perfectly viable political strategy, it doesn’t make you intellectually honest, and it doesn’t mean that you have any better ideas. And for that matter, I don’t see any Republicans out there who could lead the nation based on the criteria you’ve set for Obama and his administration. Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that Kevin Jennings erred by not showing enough outrage at a minor having sex. Could Sarah Palin clear that bar?

  • stuartzechman

    Does Amy Sullivan think that Obama could have merely rejected the Nobel Prize, or did he really need to denounce and reject the Prize?

  • pierogielunaire

    Again, fine news, spob. So I’ll count on you to stop spewing RW talking points because it’s not like we don’t know that’s what you’re doing 90% of the time. You’ve had a few moments of lucidity in recent days. Don’t go spoiling it now.

  • cfukara

    ” .. I am not sure that the Nobel Peace Prize is “one of the highest honors known to man”. Yasir Arafat won it.. .”

    And Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin .. Those blood-lusting creeps!

    Yes. Membership matters. Down with Mama Teresa. After all GWB#43 is a member of that judeo-christian sect. So is Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, … Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, .., members of the kkk, aryan brotherhood, .. [Oh, no -- Hitler was a Christian ..]

    Nuff said.

    So what is your candidate for ‘one of the highest’ honors/movements/intellects/ .. known to man, and which no one has a beef with?

  • mjwilstein

    Here’s the full video of Obama’s (reluctant) acceptance speech:
    http://www.gotchamediablog.com/2009/10/obama-reluctantly-accepts-nobel-peace.html

  • spob

    Praising a guy associated with NAMBLA is pretty bad. Let’s get that right. Your attempt to separate Hay from that is, um, pretty weak.
    .
    And I love how you euphemize the adult-child sex that Jennings apparently was cool with (until it became an issue). It involved the very dangerous cruising of bathrooms for trysts. But hey, he told him to wear a condom, so I guess it’s ok.

  • spob

    Well, when you guys can explain why a “wise Latina” cannot even read a Supreme Court dissent or come up with a coherent response on Supreme Court term limits, then maybe I’ll take your RW talking points comment seriously.

  • sacredh

    Sending in Predator drones was briefly considered.

  • Paul-no not that one

    That was pretty funny, SZ

  • cfukara

    “..Y our friend in Christ, sacredh. ..”

    sacredh?
    :-)

    Christ? Of which flavor – the one of the previous versions (about which you have a few, eh, observations) or the conservative version of the bible coming soon to a church near you?

  • Art Pepper

    Plus, Norway has the evil socialized medicine!

  • vastwastelander

    Spob,
    You gonna tell me you’ve never gotten laid in a public restroom? You need to live a little, man. Carpe diem.

  • deconstructiva

    …is it the Blessed are the Cheesemakers version?

  • grape_crush

    The ‘Village’, also called the political-media complex… explained by one Billmon as:

    …not quite Pravda — at least some of the hard questions are being asked, if only half-heartedly — but it still has some of the same barely concealed, everybody-knows-even-though-we-are-not-allowed-to-say quality of Soviet discourse in the USSR’s terminal Potemkin Village phase…

    In this instance, we’re seeing here at Swampland similar expressions of whatever passes for conventional wisdom/acceptable storyline regarding Obama’s suprise win of the Nobel Peace Prize.

  • sacredh

    Both of you are seriously intereferring with my attempts to suck up to and deceive Amy. I just want a f’ing “1000 Words” before I have to go to work.
    .
    Amy, let us kneel and pray. Uh…you first.

  • spob

    I like to live a little, but I’m no devotee of Larry “Wide Stance” Craig.
    .
    Certainly not something I would recommend to a 16 year old boy.

  • Ivy_B

    denounce and reject

    Ah, a reminder of more good times.

  • sacredh

    President Obama is going to go to Oslo and accept the Nobel Prize for Peace. President Bush went to Iraq and they threw shoes at his head. Does anyone else notice a difference in the amount of respect? The President represents the country. I’d rather have our President honored than targeted.

  • jsfox

    Exposing yourself as a “birther”. Talk about loosing any hope of ever being taken seriously again.

  • sacredh

    I think a case can be made that the Nobel committee is teabagging the past administration and their devotees. Obama and the new direction is getting honored while they drag their nuts across the faces of his predecessors.

  • xxception

    This would certainly not be the first time someone was given the NPP in order for the committee to show their support or disapproval for an American president’s actions. Remember when Carter won during the Bush years? He won for observing peaceful elections that the vast majority of observers denounced as rigged and corrupt, but Carter saw nothing wrong with them. I’m not a part of the “he should have rejected it” crowd, but it is totally logical to question whether he did anything to deserve the award in less than 1 year of being in office. It’s not like he was in the process of a great peace process when he was elected and merely continued it.

  • nflfoghorn

    Sorry, Spoob, it is what it is….

  • nflfoghorn

    Nice consolation prize for “losing” the ‘lympics. Although I agree with Joe that it’s a bit premature.

  • pierogielunaire

    (psssst! spob! That was a RW talking point…)

  • sy2d

    Tomes from Time:
    *
    Why Winning the Nobel Peace Prize Could Hurt Obama
    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1929385,00.html
    *
    Obama’s Nobel: The Last Thing He Needs
    http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1929395,00.html
    *
    It takes a village. I sh!t you not.

  • thecormac

    It means that Obama remains Obama – a believer that change is created by large numbers of people working together, not by a single “great man.” This worldview was his chief difference with the Clintons in the primary and remains the largest irritation for his critics on both the left and the right. As he said in the campaign: “This is not, and has never been about me, it is and has always been about you.”

    You change the world the same way you change America – with numbers, not ego.

    Bravo Barack!

  • stuartzechman

    thecormac:

    This worldview…remains the largest irritation for his critics on both the left and the right.

    How do you know that?
    .
    To whom on the left can you specifically point to whose irritation with Obama is even minimally related to the belief “change is created by large numbers of people working together“?
    .
    Can you name names?

  • slowp

    “Unlike Joe, I did think that rejecting the prize could have been an option for Obama.”

    Er, Amy, can you tell us how many people, in 100+ years, have rejected the Nobel Peace prize. You know, just so I don’t think your suggestion is the most f*cking stupid thing I’ve ever heard?

  • desiderada

    1973. Le Duc Tho. On the grounds that his country was still not at peace. Is that close enough to “not having earned it yet?” Imagine Rush’s glee in finding another in the top ten reasons why success is failure by declaring that only Obama and the chief adviser for the North Vietnamese agreed to forgo an unearned honor.

  • http://2thirdsrocks.wordpress.com 2thirdsrocks

    Well who would turn it down? Especially when it comes with a million dollars. Maybe he could give it to his detroit homies.

  • lawchic22

    This comment wins the thread.

    I also find it interesting that several people, i.e. Amy Sullivan, who have not won and probably never will win a Nobel Peace Prize (no disrespect, just a statement of fact), are pushing the “turn it down” option. Really? It’s the Nobel Peace Prize, not an MTV Award.

  • 53_3

    Only problem for Bush was, it all went south when those danged Muslims voted for whom they liked.
    .
    At that point, democracy became “democracy”…

  • trusktr

    You can’t reject the Nobel Peace Prize. That’s like rejecting peace.

blog comments powered by Disqus