In the Arena

Philo-Semitism Gone Amok

Mike Gerson and Ezra Klein are two of the more temperate partisans I know. Gerson is an evangelical conservative whose speeches sometimes managed to make George W. Bush look like he sorta knew what he was talking about; he was also among the rare Bushies who supported faith-based social programs because of the impact they made on the lives of the poor, rather than on the President’s poll-ratings among evangelicals. Klein–no relation, except friendship–is a wise-beyond-his-years policy wonk, who has moved to the Washington Post from the American Prospect, and has done some of the very best reporting on the health care issue.

So what is to explain this weirdly intemperate attack by Gerson on Klein?

Beats me. But it is part of a pattern among neoconservative Likudniks–including the lead Likudnik, Benjamin Netanyahu–and their evangelical running mates: Jews who disagree with them on Israel or the seriousness of antisemitism (on the internet or in the world) are either self-hating…or anti-semitic or, as Gerson spews about Klein:

Those, like Klein, who trivialize evil are actually making its advance more likely. Their cynicism and ideological manias are the allies of genuine bigotry, because they blur its distinctive shape and cover its distinctive smell.

This, because Ezra propounded the factually indisputable proposition that flaming bigots like Rush Limbaugh (who was fired after one week as a football commentator on ESPN before he made a racially idiotic statement about the quarterback of the Philadelphia Eagles) have far more influence over the intemperate nature of the public debate than various internet commenters and bloggers.

Now, let me say there is a fair amount of anti-semitic intemperance on the internet–including some on the left–and certainly, out in the world, among purposely provocative public haters like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (who still doesn’t have control of Iran’s nuclear or national security portfolios). Historically, though, anti-semitism has found its true home on the populist right.

But there has been a curious, and growing, phenomenon in the evangelical community in recent years: they just love us Jews. They just love Israel, uh, to death. For many, I’m sure, there is real admiration of Israel’s pluck and toughness and democracy. For others, as Lieutenant General William Boykin said after 9/11, there’s something of a “my God is bigger than your God” attitude toward Muslims in general–and the Israelis are on the front line of the war against the “infidels.” And then, there are those who take the Bible literally, especially the weird, fever-swamp hallucination of the Book of Revelation. This odd addendum to the New Testament has taken a disproportionate place for many evangelical Christians who believe in the Rapture–that is, a sequence of events that begins with the Jews regaining control of the Holy Land, fighting a climactic battle against the infidels (Muslims) at Armageddon (Megiddo, in the Jezreel Valley), after which Jesus returns, believers Go Straight to Heaven…and all non-believers, like any remaining Jews who don’t accept Jesus, are incinerated.

I have my doubts about those who believe such nonsense being true allies of Israel. Likudniks, though, don’t have very many allies in the world; some of them tend to see the Evangelical literalists, who bring significant amounts of tourist money to the Holy Land and have influence in the Republican Party, as useful idiots. “Prophecy” for the literalists requires that Israel retain control of Judea and Samaria (i.e. the West Bank). A great many Jews disagree, including me. We believe that to retain those areas is not only unjust, and illegal, but spells long-term demographic doom for Israel. This is not even a remotely radical position; it was held by the last three Israeli Prime Ministers, including Ariel Sharon.

I’m not saying that Gerson, or his evangelical Bushie running-mate Pete Wehner (who writes on the Commentary blog and piled on when the Likudniks called me anti-semitic), believe in the Rapture. In fact, both Gerson and Wehner, when they have their heads screwed on right, have occasionally been lonely voices reminding the evangelical community of Jesus’s social gospel (except when it comes to raising taxes to pay for aid for the poor; somehow that old, inconvenient “easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter heaven” business doesn’t play in Evangelical America). In any case, I don’t know how literally Gerson and Wehner take their Bible. I don’t know if they’re snuggling up to the Likudniks because of philosophy, prophecy or some combination of the two. But I’d advise caution when they question the Judaism, rather than the politics, of those, like Ezra Klein, who disagree with them (Add: or accuse any Jew of being soft on anti-semitism, as Gerson does here.). It’s obnoxious enough when Bibi Netanyahu calls David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel self-hating Jews or when silly old Abe Foxman calls me anti-semitic.  But after the last two thousand years, when a non-Jew indulges, it is prohibitively creepy.

Related Topics: anti-semitism, evangelicals, Ezra Klein, Mike Gerson, self-hating jews, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • stuartzechman

    Joe Klein:
    .
    Your courage in exposing and debunking this despicable and dishonest political tactic emanating from the domestic Likudnik right is remarkable.
    .
    Even your harshest critics (myself http://politicallagoon.blogspot.com/2008/09/joe-klein-is-not-your-friend.html , Greenwald, etc. ) are duly impressed and appreciative of your willingness to take down these latter-day McCarthy-ites.
    .
    Intellectual honesty compels me to say: well done again, Joe Klein.

  • deconstructiva

    Do some of these dudes want a new round of Crusades? Who’s going to play Richard the Lion-Hearted? Or Saladin? Karzai and al-Maliki won’t do good Saladin impersonations, alas.

  • dollared

    Joe,

    Well said, although with perhaps a bit too much respect for Gerson. His service to a deeply destructive regime was always based on deliberate dishonesty and manipulation, and it continues to this day. By stepping in here, you help all people who want to solve America’s problems, rather than gain power through lies and manipulation.

    For the more emotionally satisfying version, readers, you might want to read Spencer Ackerman’s more, ah, spirited take.
    http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2009/09/27/michael-gerson-your-shtetl-pass-is-revoked/

    Thanks again, Joe.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    What point is Gerson trying to make, that the Internet is the cause of anti-Semitism?

  • http://aroundthesphere.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/gerson-klein-ackerman-lets-get-ready-to-rumble/ Gerson, Klein, Ackerman: Let’s Get Ready To Rumble! « Around The Sphere

    [...] #2: Joe Klein at [...]

  • spob
  • stuartzechman

    The media would like the American Right to be represented by the likes of Bob Dole and John McCain, decent old sticks who know how to give dignified concession speeches.
    .
    Last time round, we went along with their recommendation. If you want to get rave reviews for losing gracefully, that’s the way to go. If you want to win, look at whom the Democrats and their media chums are so frantic to destroy: That’s the better guide to what they’re really worried about.

    Apart from the misdirection and ideologically-based stupidity (“Democrats and their media chums”), this is a remarkably accurate statement about the centrist political-media establishment’s fear and disdain for the popular right, and its obvious preference for unpopular elites over genuinely representative outsiders.

  • rustyreturns

    Wow, first Jimmy Carter and Bill Cosby. Now Joe Klein. The attacks of the left using the race card seems to be the new discourse from the seething far left liberals who want nothing more than to see the total destruction of conservatives.
    .
    Well Joe Klein, while you do have a position as a journalist to spout your rants on this site, folks like myself can also counter your attacks.
    .
    Just because someone states aloud or in print as Gerson did that the rhetoric is un-called for these days, does not justify you to call out conservatives for simply disagreeing with you or your positions.
    .
    There is a wide-spread degree of hate being put out in chat rooms, blog sites like swampland, and other various web pages that have nothing but hatred as the root of their evilness.
    .
    Evil is when people attempt to assinate someone’s character because they disagree with their philosophy, ideals, morals or values. Today we see people calling other people racists with no basis for the claim.
    .
    I for one am damn tired of all the crap you see spewed out like sewage on these sites. People like You, Carter and others willy-nilly say “racist”. You and Carter are indeed no different than the Rush Limbaughs of the world, only that you are just from the polar opposite side of the spectrum. Go rant and rave somewhere else with your fake outrage. You simply do it to get the other far left liberal nutballs on this site all riled up. The far left extremists then go out to peaceful conservative rallies/protests and bite off the fingers of peaceful protesters of Obama’s agenda to further change our country.
    .
    If it is a fight you are inciting, then a fight it will be Joe Klein. Hopefully you are prepared for it when it does happen, and you do not lose a digit or two in the process.
    .
    Your so-called journalism is crap, Joe Klein. And crap usually ends up in the sewers where it belongs.

  • http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com lawyermommy

    “I don’t know if they’re snuggling up to the Likudniks because of philosophy, prophecy or some combination of the two. But I’d advise caution when they question the Judaism, rather than the politics, of those, like Ezra Klein, who disagree with them”

    Under George W. Bush, the blurring of religion and politics became honed to an art. Apparently, some people did not get the memo that it was not the right way to conduct political discourse.

    PS: I do not think Christians who believe in rapture think that God will fry non believers when he comes again. I think those who hold such beliefs might belong to an extreme fringe.

    LM

    http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

  • pafro

    This troll fail actually made my morning.
    -
    When you don’t let Pete Hoekstra ghost write your columns you can be be pretty good Mr. Klein.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Is it just me or shouldn’t calling someone a nutball and extremist, and then threatening physical violence against them, be kept outside an argument which condemns the other side for supposedly doing the same thing?

  • stuartzechman

    …or, as I put it last fall:

    The main practical characteristic that needs to be understood about Centrism and Centrists is that, if you are in any sense of the word a political activist –even to the extent that you comment on political blogs in your spare moments, or go to your bible-based church a real lot– they don’t like you. That’s it in a nutshell: they don’t like politically active people trying to control their own government. They don’t trust you to make the right decisions that they, the technocrats should be making for you. They trust institutions; they trust themselves. They don’t trust you. They don’t think that you’re up to the job that citizenship in a democracy demands. They think that you should be working and shopping instead.
    .
    It also happens to be that professional class Centrists are scared sh*tless by the tent-revivalists, costume survivalists, antebellum Confederacy nostalgists and latter day Know Nothings who make up the Republican base. This is because they’re threatened by people and popular movements in general. That’s why they love to equate us with the speaking-in-tongues Pentecostals in Sarah Palin’s rural Alaskan church. They think that, Left or Right, we’re all nuts, and should just be out shopping for more SUV’s, like normal, low-information, suburban Americans (whom they empower to ruin our political discourse every four years).

  • grape_crush

    So what is to explain this weirdly intemperate attack by Gerson on Klein?

    Easy. Gerson was (nicely) called on his bullsh!t by Klein and got his knickers in a twist…Klein just (nicely) showed how, in this instance, Gerson’s image of himself as a thoughtful, intellectually honest religious conservative wasn’t quite accurate.

  • http://tinselwing.wordpress.com/ nicteis

    No reason a good Jewish boy should be expected to keep track of this goyische arcana, but worth noting:

    Gerson probably believes in the Rapture; that doesn’t mean he believes in the whole “Likudniks must fight Armageddon against the Arabs” scenario.

    The Rapture, in roughly its current form, entered into American theology a hundred fifty years ago. Its details have gone through many transformations, few of which had to do with there being an actual political entity ruled by Jews, and none of which before the last
    decade or so involved battling Arabs (other than sometimes Syria, which occasionally replaced the longtime favorite Russia as “the king of the north”.)

  • grape_crush

    Is it just me or shouldn’t calling…
    .
    Sssh! You might interrupt Rusty’s current streak of consecutive days spent wallowing in deep cognitive dissonance….

  • http://unconquerablegladness.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/punch-out-cont/ punch-out!! (cont) « unconquerable gladness

    [...] 29, 2009 · Leave a Comment joe klein: I’m not saying that Gerson, or his evangelical Bushie running-mate Pete Wehner (who writes [...]

  • dollared

    commenting on the PS: On the contrary, most major denominations believe that God is a fry cook. Take two polarities, Catholic and Baptist:

    Baptist: “..and Christ will judge all men in righteousness. The unrighteous will be consigned to Hell, the place of everlasting punishment. ” http://christianity.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=christianity&cdn=religion&tm=35&f=00&tt=29&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp

    Catholic: “Jesus often speaks of “Gehenna” of “the unquenchable fire” reserved for those who to the end of their lives refuse to believe and be converted, where both soul and body can be lost.” http://christianity.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=christianity&cdn=religion&tm=313&f=00&tt=29&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.christusrex.org/www1/CDHN/art12.html%23FINAL

    Bottom line, if you are a mainstream Christian, you most likely believe in hell, fire and brimstone.

    Exceptions, of course, for members of Unitarian Jihad: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/04/08/DDG27BCFLG1.DTL

  • FlownOver

    This all tends to remind me of junior high: “Then Billy said Betsy told him she was mad, but it was all because Scott said Billy had called her a slut or something.”

    JK’s posts risk becoming nothing more than “The Columnist’s Review of Columnists.” I’m looking for reporting on the substance rather than critiques of “The Wise Ones’ Interpretations of Reality.”

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    JK-

    First, taken at face-value, I do respect your opposition to Israel’s illegal occupation and its blatant and systematic subjugation. However, you make the common mistake of painting it all about the Jews. The entire focus of your article is on the unfair treatment Jews who oppose Israel receive. Is this no different than Israel whining about everyone being unfair to Jews? You essentially concede that us non-Jews are, in fact, anti-Semitic. (*On an important side-note, most modern Jews are not semitic, they are European Kazars; however, Arabs are, in fact, a semitic people, especially Palestinians, or Philistines)

    You perpetuate Israeli PR with such broad strokes. According to you, JK, true anti-Semites are typically from the “populist right.” So as a conservative who denounces human rights abuses, whether it be Israel, Arab Sudanese, Rwandan militias in Congo, or exploitative western corporations, I am still merely an anti-Semite for my nausea at 60 years of sustained propaganda that covers for the blatant oppression of an entire people, the Palestinians.

    Well done, JK. Well done. An excellent example of so-called critics of Israel actually engaging in subtle disinformation to discredit legitimate qualms with Israel.

  • ifthethunderdontgetya

    Gerson is an evangelical conservative whose speeches sometimes managed to make George W. Bush look like he sorta knew what he was talking about; he was also among the rare Bushies who supported faith-based social programs because of the impact they made on the lives of the poor, rather than on the President’s poll-ratings among evangelicals.

    .
    Michael Gerson is a liar and a terrible writer.
    .
    The impact of the Bush – Cheney regime on the poor should not be glossed over when you mention Gerson, Mr. Klein.
    ~

  • kevin

    OT, but NewsMax is now openly rooting for a military coup against Obama

    http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=27667&cpage=1#comment-1384925

    I can’t wait to hear how liberals were just as bad as this during the Bush administration

  • spob
  • way2ec

    From Wikipedia, Anti-Semite and Jew, Sarte, “Therefore, a Jew’s Jewishness exists only to the extent that he or she is considered Jewish by those around them.” I am trying to imagine this statement applied to being black, white, Mexican, Catholic, etc. Yes, “obnoxious enough” to deal with Jews calling other Jews self-hating, or for Joe Klein to deal with being called anti-semitic… but “prohibitively creepy” is an understatement if and when non-Jews’ ability to “control” the existence of Jewishness becomes political reality. Is this a source of the denial of the Holocaust, an attempt to control not just the existence of Jewishness, but also to control even an (earlier) attempt to obliterate it? The Pope may have the power to excommunicate a Catholic, but I can’t imagine a non-Catholic ever having the power to define Catholic-ness.

  • bgjtenn

    Mr Klein -

    I find it ironic that your commentary on the “weirdly intemperate attack by Gerson on Klein” is so hateful and insulting.

    This does not seem to a venue for thoughtful analysis or honest dialogue. It appears to be a place where extreme liberals can repeat exaggerated and unsubstantiated claims about the evil of conservatives to each other.

    Mr. Klein, I am not familiar with your work and I do not know if you aspire to be taken seriously as a journalist or commentator, but you appear to being nothing more than a “Limbaugh for the left” with readers whose actions (thoughtless regurgitation of political cliches) mimic those of the listeners of Limbaugh for whom they have such utter disdain.

  • Sebastian

    Hahahahahaha!

blog comments powered by Disqus