Glenn Beck Makes TIME’s Cover

Not just for the trouble he is causing the White House. Not just for the odd “czar” investigations he has launched on Capital Hill. Not just for the dramatic political attack he has choreographed against ACORN. And not just because of his considerable talent. As David Von Drehle argues in the piece, Beck is a man for our moment, when fear, distrust and paranoia are rising, and Americans increasingly find themselves thinking the worst of each other.

Glenn Beck: the pudgy, buzz-cut, weeping phenomenon of radio, TV and books. Our hot summer of political combat is turning toward an autumn of showdowns over some of the biggest public-policy initiatives in decades. The creamy notions of postpartisan cooperation — poured abundantly over Obama’s presidential campaign a year ago — have curdled into suspicion and feelings of helplessness. Trust is a toxic asset, sitting valueless on the national books. Good faith is trading at pennies on the dollar. The old American mind-set that Richard Hofstadter famously called “the paranoid style” — the sense that Masons or the railroads or the Pope or the guys in black helicopters are in league to destroy the country — is aflame again, fanned from both right and left. Between the liberal fantasies about Brownshirts at town halls and the conservative concoctions of brainwashed children goose-stepping to school, you’d think the Palm in Washington had been replaced with a Munich beer hall.

No one has a better feeling for this mood, and no one exploits it as well, as Beck. He is the hottest thing in the political-rant racket, left or right.

A gifted entrepreneur of angst in a white-hot market. A man with his ear uniquely tuned to the precise frequency at which anger, suspicion and the fear that no one’s listening all converge. On that frequency, Frankowski explained, “the thing I hear most is, People are scared.”

Read the whole story online here, or buy the magazine on a news stand–it comes packaged with lots of other, easily-flippable stories, with bright photos. All very cutting edge.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    Audacity of Dope: Tales of a Toking Teenage Obama

    We knew Barack Obama smoked weed in high school because he wrote about it in his books. What we didn’t know, until Buzzfeed posted these choice nuggets (I’m so sorry) from David Maraniss’s new book on the President’s younger years, were the giggle-worthy details of his “Choom Gang” lifestyle, which are right out of a buddy stoner flick. Obama and his friends drove around the lush Hawaii countryside, hot-boxing their VW bus and re-upping with a long-haired pizza-tossing dealer named Ray, whom Obama thanked in his yearbook “for all the good times.”

  • homerhk

    A disgrace, plain and simple. “Beck is a man for our moment, when fear, distrust and paranoia are rising” – what a load of tosh. There are people who fear, distrust and are paranoid and there always have been. To say this is the mood of the moment when he gets, what, 3.5 million viewers? out of 300 million viewers? double disgrace. In the middle of a supposedly serious debate about healthcare? triple disgrace.

  • slowp

    God, how vile. If you guys are so hurting for customers, maybe you should just start running naked women on the cover.

    A little background on the most disgusting man on TV:

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/09/16/beck_skousen/index.html

  • pflatley

    Pathetic.

  • kostaiki4

    Sadly, in the the type of politics that incites fear, stooges like Glen Beck are revanchist to reckon with. He’s an entertainer, who joined the ranks at Fox News, an organization that financially thrives on human insecurities.

  • pflatley

    Time magazine actually had a tiny bit of courage and journalistic integrity at one point in its history (the Joe McCarthy cover is an obvious comparison).

  • stuartzechman

    Michael Scherer:
    .
    I can’t believe that the task falls upon you to hawk this crap.

  • larry278

    Mr Beck & all of the media interest in Mr Beck are as interesting as looking a fish bowl to see a bubble that might be generated by a fish fart.
    The media are acting if they were flatulent frogs croaking in distress from gas pains.
    Mr Beck is as attractive as an oversized carp who has grown from a common Goldfish. Put him a fish tank; that’s where he should be.
    Mr Beck is another good reason for not repairing my telly & not buying a new telly to replace my broken telly.

  • charlieromeobravo

    ugly ugly ugly.

    At best Beck is a sincere but delusional paranoid that is helping to stoke the fires of our country’s worst fears and insecurities. At worst, he’s a cynical showman who has recognized our society’s insecurities and is actively exploiting them for his own personal gain.

    Drawing more attention to Beck only feeds him.

  • Paul-no not that one

    The issue should pair nicely with the Coulter cover story from a while back.

    MS-probably a good time to take a break on linking to the 6 months for 6 dollar offer or whatever the deal is you push periodically.

  • ymmartin

    I’m not even going to comment on this drivel…the cover story, not your post MS, you’re just the messenger in this case, which unfortunately doesn’t help your case as a blogger here.

    Anyway, other commenters, interesting article:

    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/09/17/glenn-beck-makes-times-cover/

    It makes me wonder, how different policies would be and laws being passed if we had better representation. hmmm, interesting, southern strategy indeed.

  • rustyreturns

    Thanks Michael. Do you send your “royalty” to Beck or Fox? Coattails are usually rode in situations like this for sure.
    .
    But, what Beck is “exploiting” is nothing more than what has been exploited over the years. For the past 2 years, it was Obama exploiting the public with his “fears” that “America needs change”.
    .
    Now it is Beck challenging those “changes”, and pointing out that “maybe change isn’t what the doctor ordered”. Maybe most Americans believe in what we have, have always had, and do not want Obama’s change.
    .
    Perhaps this article is like most, simply disqualifying a real movement and attempting to disquise it as a “bunch” of consipracy quacks. A right-wing racists surge because we now have a BLACK President.
    .
    Or it is simply what it is. A very liberal President, I dare say the MOST liberal President to ever hold the office. Someone who has employed communists, socialist, progressives and now the new buzz word for them, “COMMUNITARIANS”.
    .
    One thing is certain, Obama is trying to “change” America. He is attempting to put his liberal spin on our ideals, values and morals. He is attempting to use Saul Alinsky as his guide-book for change, and using community activism as his grass roots of support. But, he is meeting a big brick wall.
    .
    In general, most all people resist change, period. People in general do not like the un-known. You see it now with healthcare reform. We believe that what we have is working for the 80% of people who do have healthcare, and we do not want to risk losing it so that 20% may have healthcare.
    .
    It is still the old argument that liberals want big government entitlement programs to care for those who cannot or will not care for themselves versus free market enterprise and individualism.
    .
    But, what I do believe is that both Obama on his far left, and Beck on the right have nudged the middle awake. The middle being the vast majority of Americans, and they do not like what they are hearing from either of them.
    .
    What remains to be seen is the clash of the Left and RIght Titans to see who indeed comes out on top. (My bet is on the right, as most of the money is also bet on that direction).

  • michaelfury

    Can the “man for our moment” answer these questions?

    http://www.911truth.org/page.php?page=2009_truth_statement

  • meltdownmadness

    Famous TIME covers of great Americans

    March 8, 1954 – Senator Joseph McCarthy

    January 4, 1934 – Father Charles Coughlin

    If either of those extremists had
    a vehicle as powerful as Fox News the
    USA would not exist today.

    Beck is ten times worse.

  • michaelfury

    “3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/the-protection-racket/

  • ymmartin
  • michaelfury

    “5. Why haven’t authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/the-ghost-in-the-machines-the-mystery-of-the-wtc-hard-drive-recoveries/

  • Ivy_B

    A comment from jayrosen_nyu via Twitter.

    Your vacuous “both sides do it,” we’re the truthtellers in the middle first paragraph http://jr.ly/kj7m FAILS fact check 101, Time magazine.

  • fourlegsgood

    Good grief. His “considerable talents”??

    what the h*ll is wrong with you?

  • michaelfury

    “6. How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA’s radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military?”

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/

  • Ivy_B

    For all those so fascinated by the ACORN story here are some (horrors!) facts.

    http://mediamatters.org/blog/200909160028

  • pflatley

    The other thing I don’t quite understand is that whoring yourselves out in this case doesn’t even seem like it’ll pay off too well. You should get a little more bang for your buck if you’re going to sell your soul, I’d think. Speaking truth might actually benefit your bottom line more than this garbage. I only hope that all the actual journalists you guys admire are dead right now so they don’t have to see this.

  • southernbell49

    Time has reached a new low.

    If something terrible happens to Pres Obama, I will blame not Fox News, not the crazies like Beck, but so-called mainstream news organizations like Time and CNN.

    You people give these haters legitimacy.

    No wonder more and more Democrats distrust the media.

    This article was way too easy on Beck and made my stomach turn.

    This man is NOT a Libertarian. He’s from the hard-right fringe that is just as inflexible in their ideology as any Marxist they so despise.

    Shame on Time.

  • Ivy_B

    Also from the first paragraph — more he said, she said drivel trying to masquerade as journalism.

    If you get your information from liberal sources, the crowd numbered about 70,000, many of them greedy racists. If you get your information from conservative sources, the crowd was hundreds of thousands strong, perhaps as many as a million, and the tenor was peaceful and patriotic.

  • michaelfury

    Beck works for Murdoch.

    KMPH Fox 26 does not work for Murdoch:

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/truth-and-friends/

  • billiecat

    Oh Lord. Time = lost cause. I got as far as the comparison to William Jennings Bryan before I gave up. I’m outta here.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    Really, Stuart? Seems like just the task for Time’s Lifestyles writer.
    -
    The reason, in no small part, why people are frightened and confused is because the media refuses to report the news. (link is here) I’m so glad I followed the example of the rest of America and let my Time subscription lapse.

  • sacredh

    John Holmes had “considerable talents”. Glenn Beck is the very embodiment of those considerable talents.

  • southernbell49

    Ivy, that bit infuriated me, too.

    If the two reporters covering this story weren’t so lazy, they would have asked officials who actually keep count of crowds the estimate, which was, as the liberals reported, between 50,000 and 70,000.

    Michael, couldn’t you and your colleaugue actually done some background checking instead of just going straight for the false-equilency Kool-Aid?

  • pflatley

    Oh, I almost forgot. Congratulations on possibly “winning the day” and “driving the conversation” ahead of Politico today. It’s possible that you even “won the morning” ahead of them. So, you know, congrats on the fine work!

  • hellslittlestangel

    Stuart doesn’t strike me as the sarcastic type, yet how can I interpret this any other way? Mikey earned his bones powdering McCain’s flabby old behind.

  • hellslittlestangel

    Shouldn’t this post have a couple of flashing sirens and an all caps “MUST CREDIT SCHERER” ?

  • grape_crush

    /shorter crappy Time article on Beck:

    “Does Beck imitate life or does life imitate Beck? Opinions vary!”

    Thank you, Time, for putting Glenn Beck on your cover…instead of just reading your magazine while using the john, I can wipe myself afterwards with his face…

    Good Times!

  • southernbell49

    My guess is that Time felt it had to “balance” its coverage of Ted Kennedy with someone of “equal” stature on the right. I can just imagine the staff meeting, with lots of handwringing about being considered “liberal” by the far-right crazies.

    Again, this kind of stunt is why Democrats have lost so much faith in the media to actually cover real news. If Watergate happened today, I sincerely doubt the WaPo would have broken the story. That would have been left up to bloggers.

  • textee

    Evidently the political activists at Time magazine are as clueless as that leftist imbecile at ABC named Charles Gibson, who announced just two days ago that he had never heard of the existence of the videos on Obama’s massive voter fraud outfit/criminal enterprise ACORN.

    I especially love the videos of the two kids dressed as a pimp and a ho, respectively. That kid dressed as a pimp is hilarious. I’m sure that if Time magazine’s Obama useful idiots ever decide to stop ignoring the videos, they will declare the pimp outfit to be “racist”.

    10, 9, 8, 7, 6, ….

  • windygal

    Beck is a disgrace to white people along with that idiot Ruch. Fox news is just as big of a joke as these idiots. Honestly, I’m shocked that Fox has people on there network that expresses theirselves like this. I wouldn’t listen to Fox and believe anything they have to say for hate and lies are not what I want to hear.

  • shepherdwong

    And you cretins think it’s the financial model that’s killing you…bye, bye…

  • dunedweller

    Homerhk, that’s 3.5 million magazines they can sell, which is far more important to them than actually reporting news that matters.

  • sacredh

    I’ve just decided against giving subscriptions for TIME as Christmas gifts. I’m going to wrap up turds instead.

  • plukasiak

    what kind of amoral scum is now running Time magazine that it would sanitize and legitimize a hate-monger like Glenn Beck?

  • Paul-no not that one

    See: Josh Marshall, USAG.

  • bentonf

    Well, that does it for me. The glorification of a malignant, hillbilly-inciting, race-baiting amoral piece of shiit like beck is the last straw.

    Farewell, Time and Swampland. I’ll miss you most of all, Joe Klein. And the Pirate Wench.

    I’m sticking with TPM, Taegan Goddard and Nate Silver.

  • Art Pepper

    If Watergate happened today, TIME would run a story about G. Gordon Liddy’s “considerable talents.”

    Well, it’s been fun.

  • pflatley

    You’re too good for this place, KT. You can find a platform that’s on the correct side of history. Please leave Time, as I want to read you.

  • mccainfluffer

    What a wonderful journalistic achievement. I am sure all the folks at Time Warner are beaming with pride.

  • http://johio.wordpress.com johio

    I have always believed its not WHOSE’S right it’s WHAT’S right.

    Facts are facts….truth is truth. It doesnt matter if it comes from Glenn Beck or President Obama.

    I wish Michael Scherer of Time, would spend his writing on facts rather than clever put-downs and insults about the appearance and past of Mr Beck.

    But as ususal, instead we get the “attack the person” drivel of a politically correct writer.

    Sad.
    Where has truth gone?

    No party affiliation here….just an American citizen.

  • Art Pepper

    Well, I’m out of here. Firedoglake is doing a better job on health care. Also Washington Monthly. I’ve mostly been here for the commenters. Hope to see you guys around.

  • loreluca

    Love Glenn Beck. One of the very few real journalists left in the media, not just a “news” or teleprompter reader. Corageous, brave, smart man he is!!!

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    Maybe they should do a whole issue on white trash?

  • sacredh

    It is getting harder and harder to justify sticking around. It’s just a matter of time (no pun intended) for many of us.

  • notfooledbydistractions

    “… when fear, distrust and paranoia are rising, and Americans increasingly find themselves thinking the worst of each other.”

    All brought to you by that steaming piece of garbage, Glenn Beck.

    Just how low does your IQ have to be to buy into his nonsense.

    Of all the positively influential people in our country, Time chose to stink up their publication with Beck?

    I guess since you’re reporting on the likes of Beck, you don’t have to worry about facts or truth – heck, why should you worry about it, beck certainly doesn’t.

    Sad.

  • sacredh

    That was pretty funny. There’s a “1000 Words” on the next page you should post on.

  • freeinpa

    You folks are comical. First, TIME and every other MSM has left the business of journalism at least 20 years ago. They are in the business of selling their rags.

    It seems you have a problem with Beck for exposing people or organizations that are counter to what this country is about or are sheer law breakers. It seems you are more tolerant of TIME honoring those who commit treason and have been on the cover, namely Jane Fonda and Ted Kennedy. That goes along with the rationalization here as to the behavior of ACORN. Moral relativism has kicked into high gear as is normal with liberals there is always a gray line between right and wrong.

    Or we get the screams of he’s a liar. Well so is the President and that seems to slide. While he was “calling out the liars”, he himself was one. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125314896131518267.html

    Some questions Beck’s or Big Gov.org’s methods but seem comfortable that this was exactly what 60 minutes or 20/20 and other “news shows” of this type used the same methods.

    Beck’s journalism is no worse than Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” that the left genuflects before despite the fact that courts have found it to present false statements. Or MIchaels Moore, another bright light of the left who makes a millionaires living criticizing capitalism.

    And just a final piece: TIME’s cover of August 9, 2005 was Kanye West and it was titled “Hip-Hops Class Act”.

    Priceless

  • agnomina

    Having read/skimmed the piece, I’ll refrain from lamentations and rending of clothes over Time’s supposed journalistic cadaver. It’s not bad, Mr. Scherer. You don’t put the guy on a pedestal, and you do give weight to his gross flaws and overt doublespeak.
    -
    The thing I balk at is wasting dead trees on the clown. He and Limbaugh seem to be genuinely hellbent on whipping the already frothing fringe of the right into violence; the more ludicrous depths they plunge to, the more attention they get, and the more they sell. For their ilk, there is no such thing as bad press, and it unsettles me to see Time waltzing right into their game like this.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    ” I think the guy’s wrong. I think not only it was racism, it was justifiable racism. I mean, that’s the lesson we’re being taught here today. Kid shouldn’t have been on the bus anyway. We need segregated buses — it was invading space and stuff. This is Obama’s America.”

    Rush

    When is this piece of white trash going to get his cover?

  • pirate wench (demwoman)

    Thank Neptune’s stars me dead tree subscription be expired a few week ago! I were toyin’ wi’ th’ idea o’ signin’ up ag’in t’ give ‘em another shot, bu’ wi’ this? I’ll ne’er be payin’ a dime t’ TIME – e’er!
    .
    Th’ day after t’morrow me hearties! ITLAPD be me last hurrah in th’ swamp!
    .
    Kt give us a Pirate health care thread!
    .
    Michael me lad – a Pirate…wha’e'er!
    .
    AS – a Pirate religion thread!
    .
    JNS – a Pirate gossip thread!
    .
    JK – ah, ne’er mind!
    .
    Anyone – a Pirate 1000 words picture!
    .
    Ye can all say wha’ever ye want ’bout wha’ever ye want, but say it all Pirate, all day!
    .
    An, we’ll be needin’ a rousin boisterous, bawdy pirate shanty an’ much drunken revelry t’ send th’ Wench on ‘er way!
    .
    YARR!

  • mccainfluffer

    Time’s story mainstreams and legitimizes hate. I am out of here too.

    In closing, enjoy this short SNL (TV FunHouse) clip that only aired once,

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6t515_conspiracy-theory-rock_shortfilms

  • gysgt213

    Michael-You can tell your editors, that putting Beck on the cover and then writing a story about him even if its at best fawning or at worst even handed, will not make or encourage his followers or anyone who might be interested in what he might have to say, to buy your magazine.
    .
    Despite your best efforts, your organization is not liked or even respected by them. You are forever, too liberal and biased against conservatives in general and republicans specifically. You know when they call Obama names? They are talking in reality about you too. These people care not a wit about what anyone writing for your mag has to say about anything. Unless, its to mock you.
    .
    So good luck with this issue.

  • dunedweller

    It’s a dark day when Beck is passed off as legitimate by a main stream publications such as TIME. I’ve tried watching and / or listening to Beck a few times to see what all the hubbub is about and draw my own conclusion. His program doesn’t consist of news or facts, just a constant stream of accusations, rants, raves and blubbering idiocy. Hard to imagine how dumb you would have to be or how much misplaced anger you’d have to have for *that* to hold your attention.
    .
    I hope the great commenters who have announced their departure will reconsider and stand strong. Let’s kick some tea bag a$$ on these threads. Against compassion, vision, and factual information they don’t have a chance!

  • sacredh

    Well, being an Obamabot with no mind of my own, I might as well join the exodus. It’s been fun folks. I guess it’s back to woodworking projects and working around the house. F@*k blogging. I’m out of here too.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Jay Rosen is really pissed.
    .
    I think his problem is he expects better from TIME.
    .
    Beats me why he would.

  • rustyreturns

    Careful tex, you MAY be labeled a “RACIST” just simply for the fact that you question Obama’s relationship and association with ACORN.
    .
    Please see this video if you want to see the 7 SENATORS who are standing tall for ACORN.
    .
    Also Jon Stewarts’ opinion of the MSM. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    .

    .

  • rustyreturns

    I haven’t seen so many “drama queens” relenting about how “the world is coming to an end” since I last visited Huffington Post.
    .
    You people are so ridiculous.
    .
    We can now rename “swampland”. We can call it “Sesame Street News”!!

  • 53_3

    “Careful tex, you MAY be labeled a “RACIST” just simply for the fact that you question Obama’s relationship and association with ACORN.”
    .
    As rusty, in “relentlessly stupid” mode, invokes none other than Bill O’Reilly to make is point.
    .
    Here, rusty, fetch this stick:

    .
    Because one video is worth a thousand of my words, but rusty’s?????

  • southernbell49

    I’m not saying that Time shouldn’t cover Beck but putting him on the cover and then doing a flattering story about him is just glorifying the man’s ugly viewpoint of the world.

    One would assume if Ahmadinejad makes your cover in the next month or two that you will not ignore his behavior.

    I guess the dead-tree news business is so bad that to make money you have to talk up nasty people in order to sell copies of your magazine.

  • sacredh

    You get my last post rustydog.
    .
    I don’t love you. I never did. Stop calling me.
    .
    BTW, you’re getting a bald spot on the top of your head.

  • Ivy_B

    Media Matters notes that in all these words TIME didn’t see the need to mention the advertising boycott of Beck that is costing Fox $600,000 per week in lost ad revenues. He only has right wing sponsors left.

  • 53_3

    I was over on the Carter comments and it is obvious that most rightwingers are completely and utterly myopic.
    .
    They feign offense at Carter’s comments, but all the while there are people like Glenn Beck spewing trash and other clear indicators that Carter was indeed right.
    .
    Even Rusty the Wonder Nazi is so stupid as to be unable to understand the oxymoronic nature of his commentary earlier on this thread, when he not only conveys his consternation to textee over anticipated catcalls of “RACISM”*, but then in truly ironic form, invokes O’Reilly to make his point.
    .
    Such is the absolut lack of credibility that these “wronged” right wingers have:

    .
    Incredible!

  • kbanginmotown

    Harumph! I try to suggest that a “No Feeding Thursday” would be a good idea in Swampland, and TIME rolls out the buffet table on its cover. Unbelievable!

  • rustyreturns

    This latest breaking news on Fox News Channel.
    .
    “ACORN has been defunded by House of Representatives”.
    .
    America indeed!! Long live Glenn Beck!!
    .
    I guess 2012 will be a much closer race now that Obama’s favorite “get out the vote” club buddies are now relegated to where they belong, how about it IQ53?
    .
    Does this mean your own financial situation will be forever altered now, IQ53?

    .

  • southernbell49

    HuffPo now has a post slamming this Time’s cover story of Beck.

  • toddandincharge

    I liked the Coulter cover better.

    The cliched “he said/she said” Broderisms is what is most offensive about this story.

    Isn’t it an objective reality how many people appeared at the teabagger fest in DC? Why is that question framed so the number in attendance is a “belief” that cannot be disproven and therefore is solely in the subjective mind of the believer?

    Have all the factcheckers been fired?

  • square1

    Really?
    .
    I couldn’t bring myself to read the article, but the one thing that I would say in Time’s defense is that Beck IS news. He HAS injected himself into the political discourse on a daily basis. He HAS promoted the teabagger event on the national mall. And he HAS gotten Obama to toss Van Jones under the bus. So, Beck IS news.
    .
    But you are absolutely right. It is incomprehensible to me that you could write an article about him and not mention the boycott. I assumed that the article would strike an inconclusive he-said/she-said tone. But I never imagined that it would omit the successful efforts to go against Beck’s advertisers.

  • freeinpa

    If you have any questions as to why Americans will listen to Beck, O’Reilly or Rush read this>>

    http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/16/working-class-zero/

    They will listen to anyone who might even remotely reflect their feelings rather than the arrogant obnoxious liberals who just can’t help themselves.

    Happens every time to liberals. Whenever they speak wha they think people run screaming for the exits

  • rustyreturns

    Oh, and I have been saving this one for you IQ53.
    .
    Enjoy!
    .
    [IMG]http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn15/Huskrrrr/ted-danson-blackface-1b.jpg[/IMG]
    .
    http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn15/Huskrrrr/ted-danson-blackface-1b.jpg

  • http://www.davesromanticpiano.com durangodave

    As a former journalism teacher told me when I visited Washington D.C. recently, “Go to the Newseum. Pretty soon it’ll be the only place you can find journalism in America.” Well, there’s still PBS. I miss journalism already.

    “Print is dead.” – Dr. Egon Spengler

  • stuartzechman

    I don’t think a lot of folks around here get that this article is incredibly, colossally poor journalism (“If you get your information from liberal sources, the crowd numbered about 70,000“…err..that would be the liberal source named “The Washington Post” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2009/09/11/DI2009091103246.html , I guess), not just a cover-story on a celebrity entertainer that they don’t like.

  • freeinpa

    PBS? Have you ever heard of Bill Moyers?

  • http://johio.wordpress.com johio

    Am I living in a state of delussion?
    I cannot believe what has become of common sense …and many of fellow Americans ability to rightly discern basic right from wrong.

    Obama has literally surrounded himself with hard-core liberal democrats, whose agenda has always been socialism. How can ANY thinking person deny this fact, or make it about race, party affiliation, or any other manifestation of denial?????

    Bush was not “better”…the same agenda was at work to fundamentally change America.

    Shred the Constitution…deprive the citizentry ( us) of as many fundamental rights as possible, weaken us economically, militarily, and water down and throw into question our basic sense of morality and Judeo-Christian principles.

    So many distractions, strawmen,side issues..etc..
    Are there really so few that have the experience of living in this Country long enough to see the radical change unfolding before our eyes?

    Sorry to sound so dramatic…but it is hard for me to fathom the utter denial of facts concerning World Events.

  • toddandincharge

    In light of this article I think anyone would agree that TIME is fair-minded and plays it straight down the middle.

  • nflfoghorn

    In Blech’s World:

    Who wrote the cover story – someone @ the University of I Don’t Remember?
    How many mags did you sell – 100 million?
    Crocodile tears are a good thing.

  • freeinpa

    Rusty:

    You have got to stop picking on the disadvantaged (IQ 53). You will be called a mean heartless conservative for blinding him with reality

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Enough. Flight 77 didn’t “reportedly” hit the Pentagon. It DID hit the Pentagon, and with it a family of four who were my friends. They found the mom and dad’s remains in the wreckage, and the 9-year-old, but not the 3-year-old, because she was too small. They existed that morning when they called the mom’s parents from the boarding area, and they did not fly to Australia that day, or to Mars.

    Enough.

  • kbanginmotown

    Arrg, Wenchy! It be lookin’ like we be rushin’ wi’ ya t’ the door, lassie!

  • dfh

    Let’s leave Michael alone to felate texte and Rusty without an audience. I’ve enjoyed reading the comments here but I’m gone.

  • rhys6blue

    I’m always late to posting to this blog and mostly just lurk but I feel I must join in to express my outrage at the Glen Beck cover story. A puff piece glorifying this hateful windbag is the best you can do? Really? Out of all the people and important stories out there right now?

    I feel like a dupe visiting this blog and being taken in by seemingly actual honest reporting from Joe and Karen (and sometimes even Michael) that somehow never makes it into print. Well I’m done. With Time the magazine, Time.com, Swampland, even Time Warner Cable. I know my few dollars don’t mean much to people like this but it’s what I have.

    It’s sad but the corporate media whores seems to have won. I hope all of the time “reporters” here rot in hell. There must be a special place in hell for corporate media hacks who impersonate reporters.

    Bye

  • kbanginmotown

    VERY cool!

  • dorywilson13

    My God, what has happened to journalism in this country?

    Why would any responsible magazine put this dangerous and deranged idiot on its cover?

    His ‘considerable talent?’ Talent for what? Whipping the fringe into a foaming frenzy using lies and paranoia?

    If someone attempts to shoot Obama or any other politician, who will be at fault? The shooter? Or the so-called MSM who put him up to it by putting the instigator on the front page and fawning over him?

    Is making a buck what this is all about? It has to be.
    Never thought I would see the day when Time joined the likes of US, People, and the New York Post.

  • jcapan

    Wow, 10+ folks out the door!? Hmmm. I say folks pissed enough to walk, and I could easily be persuaded, should do one of two things–meet up at a place like the one Stu and Jay started (political lagoon, if it’s still up and running?) Or consider a one week boycott? Let’s leave KT and co. in the creepy company of the rightists for one week. No commenting until Sept. 24th at say 6pm?

  • mjshep

    Worse than pathetic.

    Scabrous.

    Jamison Foser says it all right here:

    http://mediamatters.org/columns/200909170033

    Need I, or anyone, say more?

  • Ivy_B

    jcapan, good suggestions. I’m ticked off, but will miss the regulars. Miss those who have already gone. Would go somewhere else if everyone were there. I see SGWhite, joyomama, SZ & Jay on Twitter, but that doesn’t allow for longform comments.

  • http://elvisberg.wordpress.com Elvis Elvisberg

    I think we get how atrocious this article is, Stuart. It imitates satire– Colbert: “reality has a well-known liberal bias”, and Krugman on what would happen if President Bush said the Earth was flat: “shape of Earth: views differ.”
    -
    That is what Time magazine is. That is what Michael Scherer does. No one is surprised anymore.
    -
    The funny thing is, it’s not even good business. Mark Halperin went running around to the Hewitts of the world, begging them to love him, but they never will. (link). And Beck followers can’t stomach the idea of being exposed to facts, which admittedly might make their way into the magazine sometimes, so they’ll never buy it. Time is catering to people who hate despise and fear them, by definition, and alienating people who want to learn about the news.
    -
    The cartoon linked at this sentence is quite instructive.

  • Ivy_B

    Media Matters says it all about this story!

    http://mediamatters.org/columns/200909170033

  • http://jonorato42.wordpress.com/ John O

    True story:

    I had a face to face discussion once with KT, that centered largely around my cancelation of my TIME subscription when Bill Kristol was hired to spew for them.

    Me: C’mon, the guy has been wrong about EVERYTHING for years running! Or words to that effect.

    KT: …

    (No confidentiality breaches from me!)

    Me: Well, that’s great, but it’s too late for me. Hey, you want an articulate liberal voice writing for you, why don’t you hire Digby?

    KT: We’re not going to hire Digby.

    Me: Why not?

    KT: *crickets*

    KT: We want you back as a subscriber.

    Me: LOL.

    If TIME had included a transcript of Beck’s famous hemorrhoid rant, I would cut you some slack.

    As it is, I’m glad I canceled. Ahead of my, er, time, as it were.

  • deconstructiva

    …why are you asking us to punish KT for something done by Von Drehle, Scherer, and the senior editors who approved this crappy cover story? Was she involved?

  • rustyreturns

    Ah shucks, freeinpa. I love to tease and torment the liberal loon. It is just so much fun. It’s like poking a stick at a rabid raccoon and watch it twist moan and groan because it is so demented from the rabies, it can’t figure out what to do next..
    .
    Plus ole IQ53 and I go back a ways on here. Ain’t that right IQ53?
    .
    But, I do love your nickname for him. I used to call him 53 and no cents. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • rustyreturns

    Ah the po’ wittle liberals are all PO’ed.
    .
    As the old saying my granddaddy used to say, “don’t let the door slam ya in the A$$ on the way out!!”
    .
    Bub bye liberals loons. I’m sure Daily CHAOS or the PUFFINGTON Post will take you all on. GO THERE!!

  • jcapan

    Decon, I’m not asking ‘you’ to do anything? I said “folks pissed enough to walk.” If you’re pleased with the caliber of posts here, great, stick around. You’d surely agree that it’s hardly about a Beck cover story. I est. a good 75% of the Swamp-posts are straight piffle.
    .
    As well, I said KT & co. Meaning the entire gang–I wasn’t singling her out. I’m neither in the P-luk (she’s a shill!) or the SZ (post your shopping list and I’ll praise you!) camps re: her work. But b/c she’s a decent human being and the only person here resembling an actual journalist doesn’t negate the fact that she’s by and large a purveyor of CW.
    .
    In the end, unlike those who have threatened to leave, this particular “issue” doesn’t much arouse me. It’s symbolic, yes, but overall it’s perfectly in keeping with this faux-news rag. Like Art Pepper, I ONLY come here to see what some of our finer fellow commenters have to say. If we could meet elsewhere, without ultimately validating this Swamp of b-s…

  • stew65

    Presiden Obama has already received more threats than any other president in American history. SHAME ON YOU TIME for writing a puff piece on the man perhaps most responsible for stirring up this hatred! I will never look at your pathetic rag again.

  • kevin

    Thanks for giving me a reason to let our subscription to Time lapse next month.

  • stuartzechman

    Elvis Elvisberg:
    .
    I got a good laugh out of that one, thanks so much!

  • anon76

    I thought the liberal sources were the DC area police? Poor commie bastards!

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    A horrible exercise in false equivalence. The line about Media Matters was particularly galling. Media Matters cherry-picks Glenn Beck quotes the same way that soup-spoons cherrypick the meat out of soup. Just dip it in and there you are……

  • dorywilson13

    I just cancelled my Time magazine subscription. I’ve been a reader for many years.

    Easiest way to cancel: go to: https://secure.customersvc.com/servlet/Show

    It’s easiest if you have your account number that’s on the cover of your magazine.

    What made the decision easy for me: I wondered, how would today’s Time magazine handle the coverage of Adolf Hitler? A cover for sure, and a story built within the framework of: well, some people say he’s a murderous tyrant and that he’s killed a few million people. And some others say he’s quite a charismatic guy who’s done no such thing. So, isn’t that an interesting controversy!

    Will my cancellation have any effect? Don’t think so. But it’s time to take a stand against what passes for responsible journalism today. Enough is enough, don’t you think?

  • stuartzechman

    You really can’t see your way to sticking around, Art Pepper?

  • stuartzechman

    post your shopping list and I’ll praise you!
    .
    …and I was thinking about starting a career in motivational speaking…

  • stuartzechman

    …I think it’s supposed to be “Puffington Host”….that’s the joke, I believe.

  • rustyreturns

    LOL@stuart

  • rustyreturns

    Actually, even tho the article was not flattering to Beck. I did opt up for a subscription so I could have a copy of this specific cover.
    .
    So I guess my signing up, cancels out your cancellation.
    .
    quid pro quo!!

  • 53_3

    I’m actually enjoying this. Neither of you has done anything but reinforce my point.
    .
    Getting insulted by right wing Froot Loops:
    .
    Easy and cheap.
    .
    Getting the same right wing Froot Loops to willingly walk into walls:
    .
    Absolutely Priceless

  • donovong

    Ladies and Gentleman, welcome to the NEW Fox News Magazine, starring Michael Scherer.

    “Read the whole story online here, or buy the magazine on a news stand” Not if my fuc&ing life depended on it.

    I cancelled my subscription last year, and will no longer dignify this place with any “clicks.” The only true journalist here is KT, and she will easily find work elsewhere when this fishwrapper goes into the sh!tter.

  • dencal26

    Glen is certainly better at investigative Journalism than 60 Minutes or 20-20. Go Glen. They are on the RUN.

  • dencal26

    Time is filled with Bolsheviks like Joe Klein who probably visits Ethel Rosenbergs grave and brings Flowers.

  • oilerspb

    This is the equivalent of Sports Illustrated putting WWE wrestlers on the cover.

  • pflatley

    One final thought about this whole thing, and I realize that you guys feel no shame about what a few dozen commentators on your website have to say. That said, please understand that the blood is on your hands because you know the mindsets of the people whom your cover boy – treated ever so tactfully – is inspiring with his hatred. You know what might happen, and you just stood by and allowed it.

    At least do us one courtesy of sparing us the all-black cover and the ten articles about how you never could have thought it could happen. Just put the next American Idol contestant on the cover that week, as that’s where the money is, right? Does that Beck cover really provide that much revenue to allow you to fall asleep at night? The anger at your irresponsibility and cowardice has only increased, but no doubt you’ll find someone of the flat earth variety to contrast my view. And, given this, you’ll determine that you “had it right” because “both sides were equally pissed off.” Well, I’d argue simply that Father Coughlin, Joe McCarthy, and George Wallace were simply wrong. You know? Wrong.

  • pflatley

    God, I can just read the next Scherer column of false equivalence cowardice. “Hitler killed some Jews, but, that said, Sandy Koufax did throw a few one-hitters in the 1960s. Most of these strike out victims were non-Jews, of course.”

    You guys make me insane because KT is so good, and Klein can be so extraordinary when he doesn’t do his “serious” Van Jones bullsh**.

  • michaelfury

    TIME is a Mockingbird, always has been.

    http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/11/17/head-shot/

  • dorywilson13

    Well said, but as Time’s deciders will say, “Words will never hurt me.”

    So, everyone cancel your subscription. And as I’ve done, go to every blog site that has a few scores of thousands of readers (Democratic Underground, Washington Monthly, Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish, Huffington Post, for a start) and state your case against Time.

    As for Time’s deciders, I suggest that you take a good look at Nancy’s Pelosi in her remarks yesterday about how this country is on the precipice of terrible violence. Look at how shaken she is because she’s personally seen close-up what it can do – the deaths of two fine public servants in San Francisco.

    And then consider for a moment your culpability in whatever will happen because of course it will happen.

    What a pathetic enterprise you’ve become. Shame on you.

  • Tom in The Swamp

    Hoooey! Charles Kaiser lays the smackdown on David von Drehle, extracting from him in an interview that he hasn’t seen Olbermann’s show in about a year and a half, and has never watched the Rachel Maddow show — so his phony attempt at equivalency between them and Glenn Beck is based on nothing but his own hypocritical prejudices and assumptions.

    Read Kaiser’s writeup here:

    http://www.hillmanfoundation.org/blog/time-magazine-loves-glenn-beck-again

    The key excerpt:

    Von Drehele also seems to think that the progressive hosts on MSNBC are really just like the right-wing crazies on Fox. But when FCP pressed him about that, he admitted that had no basis whatsoever for making any comparison:

    “I haven’t seen Keith Olbermann for at least a year and a half,” the Time writer said. “And I’ve never seen Rachel Maddow. I have four children and a wife. I don’t sit around watching cable TV. I don’t understand why anybody watches any of these shows. I know what these opinions are based on: they’re based on nothing.”

  • windygal

    Here’s someone who don’t have BRAINS!

  • bullsmith

    What a disgusting article. Really, Time is actively giving cover to a racist hate monger. What’s next “If you get your news from a liberal website, you think smoking is bad for you…?”

    The real problem with America is the fourth estate has become a fifth column that spends almost all it’s energy keeping the truth secret and reinforcing lies. Everyone who works at the magazine ought to be ashamed. You’re hurting your nation.

  • trish3010

    TO THE EDITOR OF TIME:

    Do you call this journalism?

    Do you require your “reporters” to do any background investigation?

    His only claim to fame is that he watches Fox Noise and doesn’t have time to watch “Olberman and Maddow” How about a little investigative journalism
    on the most disgusting man on TV:

    http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/09/16/beck_skousen/index.html

    you should require all your staff to read this, investigate this, refute? this.

  • 3xfire3

    rustyreturns,
    Thanks for your comments. It’s nice to read something from a sane person occasionally on this and many other websites.
    The Liberal/Progressives always demonize those that don’t share their views. Times fails to mention that Beck gives facts to back up his reports.
    Time has become so Liberal in its writings, that a majority of Americans don’t take them seriously. They and Newsweek and other Liberal magazines will be out of business within 5 years because their views are not of interest to the vast majority of Americans.
    Maybe it’s good that we have a very Liberal President. it will educate Americans why we never want one again.
    Liberals are using the race card for those who disagree with President Obama. For the vast majority of Americans race has nothing to do with their dislike for the extreme policies of this President and his administration.

  • Ivy_B

    Paul Dirks, if you were referring to my link, the majority of the quotes in the Media Matters I linked were from the TIME article. They “cherry pick” Beck quotes in order to contrast with something from the article. I did not find it false equivalence; it was a critique of the article. Salon has an article with a more devastating critique linked today by joyomama on Twitter.

  • rochrist

    This is just so pathetic.

blog comments powered by Disqus