The Rise And Fall Of Levi Johnston

I fell into watching “Don’t Look Back” last night, the great documentary of Bob Dylan’s 1965 tour through England. Dylan never cared much for the press, even though, as the movie showed, he read the tabloids voraciously and spent a ton to time giving interviews. (He expresses this view in an extended verbal assault on a TIME magazine reporter, arguing that the magazine would get closer to reporting the “truth” if it printed a cut up montage of photographs than the rewritten “facts” that are its usual trade. See the exchange, which is great fun, here.)  And in retrospect, the concurrent reporting on Dylan’s early rise was ridiculous. The press struggled mightily to fit Dylan into a box with questions about whether he was “folk” or “rock,” “political” or not, and what his message was for the children. His music was, of course, far bigger, and deeper, than these labels could contain.

Now this may be a stretch, but I remember thinking something similar when I saw Levi Johnston at the Republican National Convention, standing on stage in St. Paul with Republican nominee John McCain and his pregnant girlfriend, Bristol Palin. He was so out of place, like a man who had arrived by time machine from the past, or by light speed from a distant galaxy. His world–rural Alaska, hockey, sex, high school, hunting–had almost nothing to do with the media hot box he had been thrown into. The press, meanwhile, struggled to put Levi into a box: What did he represent? Sex education works? It doesn’t work? Premarital sex is inevitable? Avoidable? Etc. But none of the questions had much to do with Johnston. He was just a kid who got his girlfriend pregnant, and then, inexplicably, became famous for it.

Now here we are, a year later, and Levi Johnston has been transformed from media outsider–who like Dylan once had nothing to do with the press or its story lines–to a parody of himself, the star of his own unsigned reality show, made by and for the media machine. He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous. He does talk shows, gets followed by paparazzi, and, in his latest incarnation, gets photographed like a model, and paid (presumably) like a rock star, as a correspondent for Vanity Fair. The conceit of his Vanity Fair piece, which he “writes” for the October issue, is that he is going to spill newsworthy dirt on the family of his child’s mother, an act that is without question dishonorable, but for which we all, from the sidelines, applaud, for the same reason that we slow down when passing car wrecks. For those who have any doubt about what is really going on, Vanity Fair has been kind enough to post a video online in which Johnston talks about the size of his penis and how many leafs it would take to cover his genitals, if they were photographed by Playgirl. (Now I have your attention, right? Sigh.)

He paints the Palin family in a withering light, one that appears based in fact, but is of questionable public value. Does it matter that the Palins may have slept in different beds, or that Sarah Palin did not make dinner, or asked her children to rent her videos from the store, or that she proposed adopting Johnston’s child, or that she seemed depressed after the election and talked about the need to make more money? (Left unmentioned is the sum, which I do not know, that Vanity Fair paid Johnston for these revelations.)

Palin herself, it seems to me, is not in need of any private life take down. She is quickly succumbing to her own worst habits, posting distorted opinion pieces on her Facebook account, and, more recently, advising everyone to watch Glenn Beck, a man who identifies himself as not a reporter or political analyst, but as “the fusion of entertainment and enlightenment.” Says former Governor Palin, “FOX News’ Glenn Beck is doing an extraordinary job this week walking America behind the scenes of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and outlining who is actually running the White House.”

If you want to know more about what Johnston reveals in his Vanity Fair cash cow, Marc Ambinder has additional details. But I cannot really bring myself to care. Johnston could have taught us all something–like Dylan before him–by ignoring the Klieg lights and going on with his life, becoming whoever it is that he should have become. Instead, he became something we have seen before, something to ogle and stare at, something not very interesting at all.

Related Topics: Sarah Palin, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Ben Garvin / The New York Times / Redux

    Political Pictures of the Week, Feb. 4-10

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Jim Bourg / Reuters

    At CPAC, Romney Stresses Conservative Credentials

    Three days after a trifecta of losses underlined lingering questions about his ability to win over the Republican Party’s base, Mitt Romney arrived at CPAC to allay skeptics’ fears. Throughout his second bid for the GOP nomination, Romney has made his business bona fides the centerpiece of his candidacy. But on Friday, before a packed room at the annual conservative confab, he sought to emphasize the record he compiled in Massachusetts. “I was a severely conservative governor,” he told the crowd. “I know conservatism, because I have lived conservatism.” 

  • kbanginmotown

    *sigh* Your post and the VF article fail to interest – even if you included the missing apostrophe-ess after Levi’s name…

  • Matt

    These are absolutely legitimate questions considering Palin made her family and this crisis such an integral part of her story at the convention and throughout the presidential race.

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • http://aroundthesphere.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/levi-johnstons-115th-dream/ Levi Johnston’s 115th Dream « Around The Sphere

    [...] Michael Scherer at Swampland at Time compares Levi Johnson to Bob Dylan. I fell into watching “Don’t Look Back” last night, the great documentary of Bob Dylan’s 1965 tour through England. Dylan never cared much for the press, even though, as the movie showed, he read the tabloids voraciously and spent a ton to time giving interviews. (He expresses this view in an extended verbal assault on a TIME magazine reporter, arguing that the magazine would get closer to reporting the “truth” if it printed a cut up montage of photographs than the rewritten “facts” that is its usual trade. See the exchange, which is great fun, here.)  And in retrospect, the concurrent reporting on Dylan’s early rise was ridiculous. The press struggled mightily to fit Dylan into a box with questions about whether he was “folk” or “rock,” “political” or not, and what his message was for the children. His music was, of course, far bigger, and deeper, than these narratives could contain. [...]

  • damack

    But I cannot really bring myself to care.

    Except to write six paragraphs on the subject.

  • fhmadvocat

    Thanks Michael,

    After I initially read that Levi was going to dump the dirt on the Palins, I was tempted to purchase Vanity Fair. However, given that the Palins private life shouldn’t be anyone business, I don’t want to encourage the trash talk by buying the magazine.

    In all fairness to Johnson, it was Sarah Palin who thrust him into the limelight to take an example of how he was going to marry Bristol. It was clear at the Republican National Convention how much he didn’t want to be there.

    If Sarah Palin is upset with the things Levi says, she has only herself to blame. Parading your family out in the media is no substitute for statemanship. Running for Vice President while your teenage daughter is pregnant is the epidemy of selfishness.

  • FlownOver

    “… the star of his own unsigned reality show, made by and for the media machine. He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous.”

    i.e., Jake Tapper.

  • rustyreturns

    Tabloid politics, is this your new beat, Michael? I’m not surprised that this hit the Swampland rag mag rack at all.

    I guess Obama’s White House has to do anything it can to stop the downward spiral of his approval ratings.

    TIME used to be such a reputable organization.

  • centfan

    “Instead, he became something we have seen before, something to ogle and stare at, something not very interesting at all.”

    Only the lemming press was waiting for something interesting to happen so they could chase the ambulance. The people that actually hold this country together with sanity saw a shotgun wedding spun to look like a Christian lifestyle affirmation and a young man with limited prospects dealing with a bad media trap and trying to get some benefit from it before he mercifully fades away.

  • grape_crush

    Oh, snap!
    .
    Couldn’t agree more, damack.

  • Paul-no not that one

    “standing on stage in Minneapolis”

    Not a big deal but what is it that so confuses people? Minneapolis and Saint Paul aren’t actually the same place.

  • rustyreturns

    I forgot to add Michael. Why not do an epose’ on Van Jones? You know, Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar”?

    Van Jones, who is an avowed Communist. One of Obama’s right hand men? To me that is much more current, and timely don’t you think?

    Oh that’s right, Glenn Beck is exposing them, I almost forgot. The commedian turned journalist, who outwits, out performs and out does everything on the far left.

    Yesterday Beck had this montage where he showed how much Rev Wright and Van Jones sound like each other. What they say about America, and how “evil” it is and how they are going to change America.

    Beck reports NEWS! Imagine that!

  • nflfoghorn

    Hi guys – new poster but I’m pretty familiar with the dialogue and notorious flamers like rusty, spob and hulahate…

    But RE the subject: “[Johnston] paints the Palin family in a withering light…” MS mentions
    “Johns[t]on,” “withering” and “penis” in same post. What gives?

  • square1

    He paints the Palin family in a withering light, one that appears based in fact, but is of questionable public value. Does it matter that the Palins may have slept in different beds

    No.

    or that Sarah Palin did not make dinner, or asked her children to rent her videos from the store

    No.

    or that she proposed adopting Johnson’s child

    Maybe.

    or that she seemed depressed after the election and talked about the need to make more money?

    Yes, the woman was only the governor of Alaska and a former V.P. candidate. I like to think that her motivations and mental health are important.

  • nflfoghorn

    Oh yeah – Dylan can’t sing a lick.

  • destor23

    Funny. Levi spilling hypocrisies about the Palins is a non-event according to the same guy who posted this:

    http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/05/05/elizabeth-edwards-book-excerpt-a-single-time-was-not-all/

    When Time excerpted Elizabeth Edwards’ book.

    So dirt on Democrats is okay but Levi isn’t worthy of the attention.

    Nice.

  • nflfoghorn

    “Glenn Beck is exposing them…[he] reports NEWS! Imagine that!”

    My head now officially hurts from the triple-entendres and all that imagining.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    my bad. fixed.

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer

    also my bad(t). fixed.

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I’m surprised McCain’s brain-trust, and all the conservative intellectuals, couldn’t see the possibility of this train wreck coming?

  • nflfoghorn

    Thank you, MS sir. For a minute I thought this was a Jon & Kate blog.

  • dfh

    First Joe Klein’s petty tirade about Glen Grenwald and now this. The stupidity of those in charge of the political dialogue in this country is astounding. Did Michael Scherer just compare Levi Johnson to Dylan? Idiocracy here we come.

  • pafro

    You can’t expect McCain to bearhug someone into the limelight and then expect that person to just slink back into the Alaskan fog.
    Look, you people still take McCain so seriously that he has had to be on the Sunday political shows something like 15 times since the election. If we are forced to put up with that angry and sanctimonious gasbag telling us what President would do if he wasn’t such a losing McLoser, at least we should get to have the ongoing comedy routine the rest of his freak show provides: the Palin’s, Levi Johnston, Joe the Plumber, the somehow now important Megan McCain.
    I’m not saying that anyone should take anything any of these people say or do seriously, but we should get to mock them and gaze dumbfounded at the trainwreck (hopefully from afar) as long as you traditional media types keep acting like Saint McCain won the election.

  • hellslittlestangel

    Does Mikey respond to any criticism beyond spelling errors? I mean, his “bad” is the whole flipping People magazine post.

  • Tom in The Swamp

    I can’t believe you are wasting a moment’s thought on this bit of prurient trivia. Worse, I can’t believe that I’m wasting my time with your self-indulgence.

  • destor23

    This is an excellent point. Why would people lecture Levi about heading back into obscurity? He’s got the right to do whatever he wants after the McCain/Palin campaign tried so hard to use him as a prop.

  • pirate wench (demwoman)

    Michael me lad, I guess this be meanin’ tha’ yer previous attempt a’ actual journalism be a’ an end?
    .
    Pity – I were havin’ such high hopes fer ye a’ least attemptin’ t’ follow through’ wi’ th’ truth project I were suggestin’…
    .
    Yarr

  • nflfoghorn

    On the whole I’d prefer the ‘now important’ Megan McCain to the ‘wishes she were important’ Liz Cheney.

  • shepherdwong

    “He is just another one of those people who has become famous for being famous.”
    .
    Just more “reductio ad absurdium of modern American medio-politics”. At least he isn’t getting a gig on the Today Show. Yet.

  • destor23

    Except that he’s not famous for no reason. He’s famous because John McCain and Sarah Palin made him part of a campaign for the presidency. He’s not a Paris Hilton type in that sense. He’s a kid who was used by the political establishment who is now giving them the business.

  • stuartzechman

    Jesus, Michael Scherer…
    .
    It’s a lovely metaphor, and a novel one, but isn’t your talent truly wasted on this sort of tabloidism?
    .
    I’m perfectly aware that this individual piece isn’t the sum of what you cover, but…the Palin family saga?
    .
    Isn’t your life too short to waste on this kind of thing?

  • southernbell49

    The MSM have spent years making sure every private aspect of the Clintons’ lives was made public.

    But now that a adored rightwing extremist’s personal life is under scrutiny, the MSM suddenly develops scruples about examing private lives.

    I wonder if one can hurt one’s self while simultaneously rolling one’s eyes and vomiting.

  • deconstructiva

    shepherd, maybe he won’t get “Today” job but with Diane Sawyer replacing “In What Respect” Charlie Gibson, maybe LJ can take over at GMA…if Sarah doesn’t get the gig first.

  • gysgt213

    I’m not sure why, but for some reason I think Levi should grab all the attention and cash he can as quickly as he can. What makes Levi less deserving than Paris Hilton, Jenna Bush, Cokie Roberts, Mike Wallace or Luke Russert and others who only got where they were because of their famous parents’ work and not from working their way up from the bottom rung.

    Levi will never get another chance and if there fools out there willing to pay for what he thinks about any thing I say take it.

  • nflfoghorn

    U sure you meant Mike? Chris more fits your point.

  • shepherdwong

    Hey, I’m not knocking the kid for exploiting a rotted system (that would be silly, especially if I was the obvious beneficiary of that very non-meritocratic system). Even if he got a serious journalism gig, it’s hard for me to see how he could do that much worse a job than some disgraceful “journalists” who are still considered “successful” among their owners, managers and peers. For that matter, you could put him in charge of the CIA or the banking system. It’s hard being a liberal elitist these days.

  • gysgt213

    Yes I meant Chris. Not Mike. Thanks.

  • destor23

    Apparently not. And I really want to know why some one who thinks the John Edwards affair is news thinks this isn’t.

  • momentomaury
  • spob

    Levi, meet Cindy Sheehan.

  • hellslittlestangel

    “…all the … cash he can as quickly as he can.”

    The Alaskan Crank Dealers’ Association agrees with you 100%.

  • gysgt213

    Well, I’m glad the ACDA is on board.

  • the committee

    Good god. What makes you think anyone cares to read all this stuff about how you simply do not care?
    .
    Overscherer.

  • gwbc

    I almost feel sorry for Sarah, almost , except I know this will just get her some sympathy and her supporters will be more rabid than ever.
    and Michaiel , don’t you have anything better to do?

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    I sincerely hope that Glenn Beck gets a call from Van Jones’ attorney. He is telling harmful lies abut someone to an audience of millions, and that is slander, pure and simple. Beck is just mad at Color of Change for going after his advertisers.

  • pafro

    Can we get him a recurring gig on Good Morning America?
    Send him around the country wrestling alligators and reporting on eating contests.

  • december7

    I have no time for Sarah Palin, but its despicable Levi has chosen to disparage the grandmother of his son in public. I am a wide eyed liberal but I say shame on Levi!

  • notfooledbydistractions

    He’s todays Kato Calin.

  • juniusredivivus

    Two empty sets, my friend, two empty sets.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I’d like very much to be able to safely ignore Sarah Palin. To that end, I’d like very much to be able to ignore Levi Johnston.

    Isn’t his 15 minutes up yet?

  • plukasiak

    the problem here is that its perfectly acceptable for a magazine like Vanity Fair to do this kind of story — its what they specialize in.

    But a magazine like Time should also ignore the story. Instead, they treat it as if its was significant.

  • Cliff

    But I cannot really bring myself to care.
    .
    What kind of stupid motherf–ker writes this after wasting five paragraphs on the topic?
    .
    I hope you catch the swine flu, Michael Scherer.

  • sacredh

    I thought I’d stop in to see what I’ve missed and find an article that mentioned the size of Levi’s wang. Tsk tsk.
    .
    Shouldn’t the article have been named “The Rise and Fall of Johnston’s Levis”?
    .
    I think I’ll have my project completed in about 3-4 weeks. Rip and tear folks.

  • toddandincharge

    Isn’t he famous because Palin used him as a prop?

    Also, and taking into account that he is evidently disgruntled, are you seriously suggesting there can be nothing newsworthy to learn about the leading GOP candidate for President in 2012 from someone who was part of the inner circle the first time she ran for national office?

  • gloriousglo2

    ….there is a common thread here. The sickening sound of human fingernails scratching against the walls of the pit in a desperate effort to get out. In this case, the pit would be Alaska…..

  • karathrace

    Not disagreeing, but I think the word you’re looking for is epitome.

  • rhondayes

    Has any of you noticed how some of the conservatives are trying to paint Levi as a liberal?

    When ever any of them blow a gasket Fox News reluctantly report on them but always displays a D instead of R to denote party affiliation.

    It is like rats deserting a sinking ship.

  • rhondayes

    Palin has played and continues to play the republican base for fools. They believe so wholeheartedly in her and the lies told to make her seem one of them or maybe she is. She is lazy and wants the glitz without the work.

blog comments powered by Disqus