Awesomity

Does he rule your world?

The correct term is: hyperwankericiousness. Awesomeity is both inaccurate and like so yesterday already.

What is it with wingnuts and spelling? Is this not stressed during home-schooling?

The best part was that when he said that a letter was missing I thought there was going to be a clever explanation for the moran.

It is pretty compelling in a trainwreck kind of way.

I thought the missing letter would be “C.” But, alas, he fools us all!

Hey, hey, easy on the home-schoolers.
~
And, damm*t, you beat me to the “C.”

I can’t wait for scientists to detect biological differences in people’s brains (apparently related to spelling) that explain the inability of wingnuts to detect obvious charlatans.

Look, I get it when a real natural like Rush Limbaugh is able to buffalo the masses. But these people can’t see through Beck’s crocodile tears? They give away their money to barely-closeted evangelical preachers? They can’t even tell that Steven Colbert is not really a Republican? That’s not normal. That’s like the political equivalent of color-blindness. There’s gotta be a gene.

I think the learned call Glen Beck’s condition, “nucking fits”. Check that in the latest edition of DSM

Watching that video Michael, may shed some light on why the media is in trouble.

It’s like some Twilight-Zone intersection of QVC, a Ron Paul rally, and lolspeak…

…and for God’s sake, put on some dress shoes.

The only thing wrong with what that guy’s is doing is that he’s absolutely incorrect on the facts, and his goals are terrible for the country.
.
Other than that, I don’t see anything bad about organizing people to stand up for their interests.
.
We forget that the rightists are populists, too.
.
We also forget that this is the very thing that scared the centrist establishment into including their viewpoint on Meet The Press –in this country, the left will be appeased or shamed into silence, but the right will not.
.
Much of this situation is our fault for having abandoned (we’re still abandoning them) so many people to the right, and for having been so complacently satisfied with the Pentagon Papers/Watergate era press corps that we stopped working to replace them.

I always end up thinking Beck must be on drugs when I watch his show…

http://www.political-buzz.com/

All joking aside, Glenn Beck has profound mental illness running in his family and as crazy as he is, I do credit him for overcoming that and his addiction issues to be successful.
.
He really is nutty though in a Michelle Bachmann kind of way. YOUR COLLEAGUES at Fox should be embarrassed to be enabling him.

Truly, Glenn Beck reminds me of Andy Kaufman at his most awkward, the times it hurt to watch. Is he going to lip-sync the Mighty Mouse theme anytime soon?

The unfunny part is all the people who think he speaks the truth.

We also forget that this is the very thing that scared the centrist establishment into including their viewpoint on Meet The Press –in this country, the left will be appeased or shamed into silence, but the right will not.
.
Really, Stuart? Is that why millions of Iraq War protesters were dismissed as unserious hippies, but our news media can’t get enough teabagger coverage?
.
My hypothesis is that opposing the Iraq War was against the interests of those who own our Congress and our media. Opposing health care reform, OTOH, supports those interests.
.
…and for having been so complacently satisfied with the Pentagon Papers/Watergate era press corps that we stopped working to replace them.
.
Do you own a TV station or a newspaper? Neither do I! Ownership of these is concentrated in the hands of a very few wealthy people and corporations.
.
Do you think it’s a coincidence that Joe Klein opposes a public option for health care and prosecution of high level Bush-Cheney figures for torture? Same as the FOX network, and the K Street lobbyists.
.
Glenn Beck serves to push the right side of the Overton window further right. This allows the likes of TIME and the Washington Post to pretend that they aren’t disseminating the same right-wing corporate propaganda.
~

Could someone explain how they get their hypertext links to show up in red?
.
I’ve tried enclosing the url in quotes, and tried not doing so…with random results.
~

Couldn’t do it. I tried though. You’ve got to keep the clips of crazy down to around 2 minutes. Sorry.

The point about Beck that needs to be discussed is that he is doing the bidding of the ultimate cynical puppeteer, Rupert Murdoch.

As crazy as Beck sounds, he represents the voice of the majority membership of the Republican party. His rantings are just slightly more theatrical than the so-called mainstream Republicans. Yet, how many Republicans have denounced this type of behavior?

He’d make Morton Downey Jr so proud.

When you get past all the apocalyptic histrionics, it’s just the whining of a bunch of sore losers. It’s really nothing we didn’t see 16 years ago when Clinton was elected, and nothing we won’t see every time a Democrat is elected President.

No, the more terrifying thing is that he might believe it himself.

Somebody Tweeted that today he said Obama is going to bomb Canada. I can’t tell if that is a joke or real. I’m betting real but the craziness is so out there I just can’t believe people believe this crap but they do – and that is sometimes hilarious and sometimes terrifying.

SZ
~
What’s the deal with your recent fall from grace among your fellow comrades?

the frightening question is who goes over the deep end first?

Beck or one of his followers?

I’m not criticizing Z.S., Exile. He is mentioning a theme I’ve seen Bob Somerby discuss, as well.
.
I think there’s something else bigger going on, is all.
~

THE BLOGGER

A blog for the world

Point taken. I am merely noticing an emerging trend of condescending responses to our beloved SZ. It’s surprising, that’s all.

Doesn’t he remind you of a cult leader?
.
The end of the world is coming. But fear not; through me you can be saved. All you have to do is drink this.

When people complain about the SUV you drive, Beck suggests responding by asking “How many of your earth loving friends are vegans”.
.
Answer: A billion percent more than the number of vegans that watch your show, Mr. Beck.
.
This is ridiculous…

[...] Right now, it’s still okay for journalists to make fun of Glenn Beck. But if it keeps his ratings up for much longer, it won’t be. BriWi will be calling into his show and saying that Beck has actually yet to get the credit he is due, comedians will be censured for making fun of him, Republican office-holders will have to apologize to him regularly, Mark Halperin will start appearing on his show (whoops, that already happened), Joe Klein will start comparing him to Glenn Greenwald. [...]

This self-described rodeo clown may just start leading people over the edge like killer lemmings. The 9/12 Project? I’m mad, so are you, and we’re not alone? They’re watching us, but we surround them? Obama is a racist who doesn’t hate white people? Obama’s a commu-social-fascist? Seriously, WTF?

And OLIGARHY? Glenn, why do you hate the Irish so much?

I have a feeling that K.O. and RachelMaddow rule Michael Scherer’s world. At least he’s open about being a partisan hack.
.
Say, if there are any Glenn Beck viewers who want to wipe the smirk off Scherer’s face, here’s how to do it.

ifthethunderdontgetya:
.
First of all, you make very good points, but I tend to disagree.

Is that why millions of Iraq War protesters were dismissed as unserious hippies, but our news media can’t get enough teabagger coverage?

Yes.
.
If there wasn’t talk radio to get the word out in local communities, I don’t think that Fox would have picked up on it necessarily –there are plenty of white teens being kidnapped every day. If there hadn’t been a Fox News Channel, there would be no televised coverage of these events, apart from a little sensationalism with the assault rifle people, probably (and C-Span).
.
If there weren’t churches connected to those radio shows via faxed talking point memos, these slogans and buzz-words wouldn’t have been spread consistently between national and corporate organizing and community efforts.
.
Finally, the Republican party, from RNC to national candidates to state representatives to Congress all got on board with the speed required to represent these talking points in serious, national political media.
.
The Iraq War protesters, on the other hand, pursued a failed, disconnected, largely symbolic non-strategy of expressing themselves first, effecting meaningful change last (if ever).
.
Remember, there were significant protests a decade earlier during the first Gulf War, weren’t there? It appears that there were no lessons learned from those marginalized, thoroughly ineffective, demoralizing wastes of organizing time, money and effort by the organizers and protesters of the second invasion.
.
I think this has something to do with the old idealism and symbolism that much of the baby-boom grass-roots left accepted as identifying articles of faith. The protesters attempted to recreate scenes from prior decades during which mass movements emerged that were relatively successful, connected morally and strategically to Ghandi’s heirs the Civil Rights movement, the union movement that culminated in the power of organized labor to strike and disrupt the economy, and the Bonus Army of World War I veterans that occupied Washington.
.
To attempt to recreate those successes in the post-Vietnam mass media dominated US –where mass-marketing driven media had truly coalesced into its present institutional form– was suicidal. To repeat the attempted recreation of these movements again and again was worse than suicidal –it was symbolic.
.
The left is the victim of its phenomenal successes forty years ago –the successes that were achieved by recreating what had been done successfully by other movements in decades prior.
.
The right tried at one point to organize this way, failed, and started work on a new strategy, one that operated on the premise that without an indigenous media there can be no movement, which ultimately proved highly successful in creating both the modern populist conservative movement and its populist conservative media.
.
When you correctly mention:

Do you own a TV station or a newspaper? Neither do I! Ownership of these is concentrated in the hands of a very few wealthy people and corporations.

, let’s not forget that when the conservatives started out on their path to media ownership, there were only the three major networks, and no way into the world where Walter Cronkite had declared that America had lost the war –and Dan Rather got up in a press conference and insulted their president. The entirety of youth culture was anti-conservative, and had its own media –records, movies and FM radio– that was as popular and ubiquitous as one could hope for. The national newspapers had become presidential muckrakers, fully invested in one side of the partisan destruction of a sitting president. For nearly a decade this dominance went on virtually unopposed.
.
It was the forgotten world of sports talk radio on the worthless AM dial where they staked their claim piece by ad dollar-less piece, right?
.
When you say Do you own a TV station or a newspaper? , I’m sure that was what Karl Rove heard all the time when he was head of the College Republicans.
.
There is also another, much more formidable, structural problem with liberalism itself that we don’t talk about very often –not that honesty with each other has been all that prevalent, especially during those uncomfortably recent primary days. Corrente lays it out fairly cogently in a post entitled “The New Benevolent Democrats” (please forgive the length):

Before the primary it had been so long since Democrats held power I never noticed how much Democratic philosophy and policy advocacy had changed. But during the primary I started to note what I would call a split in the Party between those who sought economic justice for the middle class, and those who sought social benevolence for the poor.
.
I’m always on the side of helping the poor, but in policy terms, I’ve always thought what helps the poor most is to empower the middle class. Policies that target only the poor through subsidies and welfare programs, and sort of ignore the plight of the middle class over the last several decades, don’t leave those on the bottom with anywhere to move up to. Further, often the needs of the poor can only be met through vigorous funding of public programs, not simple charity. And, at this time of economic lopsidedness, often policies need a broader scope than limiting social programs to the least among us. When social programs include the majority of working people they are extremely empowering and hold great staying power. Medicare and Social Security are two examples. Both programs are taxpayer supported by the broad populous. Neither is a welfare program. Social Security, particularly, is a program where what you put in is basically what you get back. It puts everybody on the same playing field and no one who pays into those programs thinks they are recipients of the gift of health care or the gift of retirement security.
.
Our greatest social achievements came at a time when we had a strong labor movement, but that era is over. So who are the policy makers now? They are largely academics, white elites who seem more intent on policies of benevolence than in risking their upper middle class status in the name of supporting a larger middle class through empowering policies of justice.

The phrase “It is noble to serve a cause greater than one’s self” is common enough these days that it seems to require no explanation, but it means two entirely different things to the movements of the past, really.
.
When one thinks of this maxim in terms of the union movements of the early twentieth century, or the military code of honor, one can easily see that the motto is identity affirming on the part of the “self” who is asked to sacrifice. The “cause greater than one’s self” is made up of people just like the “self” –the individual is noble for sacrificing personal, immediate interest for the their own ultimate cause. The identity of the group is identical to that of the individual, and the submission is therefore to perpetuate the identity of both in a struggle against an opposing identity.
.
In the other meaning of the term, largely born out of the desire for vicarious participation in the morally righteous civil rights movement, I believe, the “cause greater than one’s self” is meant to be greater than one’s individual and group identities. One helps the literal other in a struggle against another opposing identity. Such is the cause of liberal benevolence, I believe.
.
It is very, very difficult to make a self-nullifying cause into a mass movement in the post-mass media era of branding and identity –especially with no media to market that lack of identity, and especially when such a cause is historically inimical to being a member of the middle class in America.
.
I could go on and on, obviously, but I’m waiting for a half-millisecond between keystrokes now due to this awesome preview pane…
.
Thanks for reading and considering this, ifthethunderdontgetya.

Neorationalist86:
.
I am merely noticing an emerging trend of condescending responses to our beloved SZ
.
Perhaps if enough people actually read through my commentary, then there would be enough condescension to constitute a trend.
.
As it is, criticism is appreciated. juniusredivivus did a superb job taking me down stylistically the other week. It makes for good commentary –if we do it to the writers, we should do it to ourselves, too.

it’s Glenn Beck Friday on the Fox News channel!

I can’t figure it out either.

He’s like a demented Mad Lib. None of the words he’s saying have much logic in context, but taken alone (or, as he does in his rants, percussively thrown around a bunch of random words out of a high-school fight song) they’re all just designed to gin up emotion.

I’m so sad to think that people listen to this and think it makes sense.

That’s exactly what I thought: that the hippie liberals he so despises are EXACTLY the sort of people who only eat red meat twice a month and chicken once a week, and who pour money into their local farmer’s market.

Not to mention the craven jeering of “Oh yeah? Well, why should I care about the environment until you are 100% carbon-neutral, hunh? Answer me that, greenie!” Because obviously, that’s how it should work: first the greens go carbon-neutral, then the people who live off the government, and only THEN when everyone else is shouldering the burden will the Real Americans consider giving up their SUVs.

Nothing like looking out for #1.

Thanks, Stuart. When I say I have had random results, I mean one of my hyperlinks showed up in red. One time!
.
I saw you had a couple links show up in red in just one comment, and I thought: That SZ knows the answer!
~

SZIfthethunderdontgettoyoujaili:: wrote:

“Could someone explain how they get their hypertext links to show up in red?

I’ve tried enclosing the url in quotes, and tried not doing so…with random results”.
____ ______
Rather an odd question since you perennially post over and over on here and elsewhere.

Hmm… you certainly comment here and on other sites with such frequency that “you” and a few “others” would appear at least on a balance of probabilities to be the sort that would be quite adroit in REAL complexities and other obscure details about the web and manipulating the Internet.
(I said a few times that there are a myriad of multi-aliases all by ONE poster. Commenting and responding to himself comment after comment, post after post)

“Cut and paste”. No big science here and yet such profuse feigned ignorance? Hmm.

Cutting and pasting from “world press” or other sites would seem most rudimentary considering the emm vast and continuing online dialogue in which “many” of “you” continiously engage.

“You” live on line or at least so it seems to a practiced reader who studies commentary and writing style for legal reasons.
Here, it is the same poster over and over and over. Same modus operandii-trickery, comment, argue with other comments made by self etc. etc. One person and many many many aliases.

It would seem quite unlikely that something as basic as “Cut and Paste” would flaw someone who “writes” and “writes” and “writes” in so many many comments For and against and effectively argues with his other aliases.

Misrepresentations, trickery, alias after alias after alias. Same person, many many many handles.

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

L-Moms!
~
(Whispering) when you’re not around, SZ refers to himself in the 3rd person as Akbar. And there may have been something about his wife, Shay something?
~
Not sure if these names strike any bells, but I’d say keep your eye on him! He’s a trickster

I totally thought C was going to be the missing letter because of the hidden communists in the Obama administration. Communism for the C is a complete layup for Beck’s brand of crazy and he totally bricked it. He’s even EPIC FAIL when it comes to his very own lunacy.

The degree of paranoia that Glenn Beck has displayed in recent months seems to be escalating. One has to wonder at what point he will go over the edge or simply implode? You would think that someone at Fox or one of Glenn’s closest colleagues would suggest he seek professional help. At the very least someone should check what is in the water cooler at Fox that all these pundits like Beck are starting to exhibit breaks with reality and an increasing paranoia. Or is this what happens to Republicans when they lose? I hope not…because I was a Republican for nearly forty years before I started to see through their propaganda aimed at the Christian community. Fear mongers only have power over the uninformed. Its amazing how my perceptions changed when I started doing my own research and stopped depending on the news media to tell me what they think I should know.

What scares me now…that so many buy into all the BS put out there by the likes of Beck, Limbaugh, Cheney and Palin. Oh…forgot Romney, Cantor and ol’ Bobby Jindal.

Thanks for reading and considering this, ifthethunderdontgetya.
.
Why, certainly! Although I think to an extent, we are talking at cross-purposes. I was making a point about the media in response to your statement: We also forget that this is the very thing that scared the centrist establishment into including their viewpoint on Meet The Press.
.
And I think you were making points using my examples of how the existence of a ‘left’ and a ‘right’ media in this country is a fiction (it’s all corporate) to make points about the left as a movement that isn’t getting anything accomplished. So it’s all good.
.
More explanation on my blog of what I was referring to.
~

Curious… Our resident wing-nut trolls haven’t chimed in to support Beck.

Michael, you obviously aren’t a connoisseur of crazy conspiracy talk if you think Beck is entertaining. He’s the other half of a half-wit. When he starts talking about “purity of essence” and fluoridation, call me. Until then – yawn.

what part of this garbage is fair and balanced??

“jcapan”,

Your insulting comment has no effect. As usual, your failed attempt to discredit me using scathing humor, pathetic.

I am a practiced reader who studies commentary and writing style for legal reasons so despite your failed attempt to minimize the seriousness of the issues I raise– there is ONE PERSON (a very criminal savvy Internet hoodlum) making comment after comment, arguing with “themselves” and re commenting, adding aliases, changing leaving returning—a study in online “depravity”–in this case also, desperation.

Let me repeat, online criminals like this woman Eve Sharon Moore of the website “BlackFemaleInterracial marriage” blog is the face of 21st century crime. She is a vicious and desperate felon, Predator and probable Pedophile.

She is a cyber bot and accesses, creates and alters hundreds of sites daily.

She also has illegally wiretapped my phones (home and cell) and wiretapped those of reporters whom I have contacted in my quest to prosecute and jail this vicious reprobate Eve Sharon Moore aka Halima Sal Andersen of the website “Black Womens Interracial Relationship Circle” and Black Female Interracial Marriage” and “Black Womenblowthetrumpet” among hundreds of other sites she owns and operates.

Websites and blogs rife with lies and misrepresentations created for the sole purpose of misrepresenting herself and bilking the unwitting public of their hard earned monies.

This woman is a vicious criminal and violently tracks me (and I am sure does same to other unwitting visitors to her site and criminally stalks innocnet users of the web) with an unbridled and perniciously wicked zest. She is a violent and despicable Thug.

Again, my point on a previous post bears repeating:
Because many people do not know the full gamut of technology based crimes AND the ease with which these felons hide on the Internet in fear (of being exposed and prosecuted) does not change the need for a sustained and vigorous investigation of such vicious and brutal Predators.

Violent and brutal crimes of the sort committed by this vile Reprobate Eve Sharon Moore aka Shay Rileyof the site “Blackfemaleinterracialmarriage” blog and her husband Akbar Shabazz (this woman claims to be interracially married and operates numerous blogs and profit geared sites to this end– but her husband is a Black Thug) should nonetheless be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!

CRIMINALS, PEDOPHILES, CHILD MOLESTERS, TRAFFICKERS IN CHILD PRONOGRAPHY, CHILD SEX TRADERS, STALKERS AND and VIOLENT PREDATORS now use the web and telephone to prey with stunning zeal on unwitting law abiding citizens including and especially CHILDREN.

The sudden explosion of the web cannot obscure the need to continue a sustained and thorough investigation of criminals like this woman and others of her ilk.

Online crimes do not lend themselves to short term investigation. The ability of these felons to wiretap phones, alter sites, read reporters emails, fabricate news releases, steal and create extensive fabricated histories and hide their digital tracks makes crimes of these sort not only dangerous and life threatening but also requiring experienced and tenacious investigators and reporters to expose, prosecute and jail these felons.

Triggering a continued investigation of this woman Shay Riley aka Eve Sharon Moore of the website “BlackWomenblowthetrumpet” (she owns hundreds of other sites) and her husband Akbar Shabazz of the websites “Field Negro”, “Brother Peacemaker The Black Sentinel” etc. is one of the reasons I post on here as this is a site run by elite reporters.

So no, inane and churlish comments from emm “one” or “many” of the so called commenters here provide NO deterrent to my continued posts on this and other issues here . I will not stop until this woman and others like her are exposed and jailed.

Eve Sharon Moore of the website “Blackfemaleinterracialmarriage” blog is a violent felon, Thug and probable pedophile, and should be Jailed!

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

It is very, very difficult to make a self-nullifying cause into a mass movement in the post-mass media era of branding and identity –especially with no media to market that lack of identity, and especially when such a cause is historically inimical to being a member of the middle class in America.”
.
How the hell is reforming the entire private-insurance-based health care system (or the Iraq War) a self-nullifying, “social benevolence for the poor”, issue? You couldn’t come up with a much better example of a “social program…[which] include[s] the majority of working people”. Sorry, maybe I’m dense but I don’t get the point.

I’m thinking Beck could have a career at QVC if the Faux News thing doesn’t work out.

Okay, who gave Michelle Bachmann a WordPress account?

Shephard Wong:
.
This is what I’m talking about:
.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/08/25/labor/print.html

“Okay, who gave Michelle Bachmann a WordPress account?”
agnomina
September 1, 2009
at 12:50 pm

Michelle Bachmann?
Another pathetic attempt to deflect the focus from the cogent issues I raise. Weak and unsuccessful, as usual. Such petty comments speak volumes about the poster.

Crime or any related criminal conduct is nothing to joke about and comparing a fellow commenter to Bachmann, is certainly crass to say the least.
So, I would compare you to Dick Cheney, a man who consistently attempts to defend the indefensible, horrific crimes.

He runs from one interview to another claiming torture works–seeking in full view of the public to justify violent and illegal conduct which he promoted and endorsed—all the while attempting to deflect public attention from the ignominious conduct he actively promoted while in office.
So, your Cheney-like attempt to deflect from the truth, “Agnomina” fails and will continue to fail.

Comments such as yours (and your repeated callous attempts to minimize crime using sarcastic and callous remarks) are weak and do not serve as any deterrent to my seeking the incarceration of Eve Sharon Moore of the website “BlackfemaleInterracialmarriage blog” a vicious felon, online Thugs and hoodlum who will eventually be jailed.

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they do turn.
Justice, I believe always prevails.

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

Whilst there are certainly trolls that populate commentary here with their fake arguments, I’m not one of them –a fact of which Oregon JC is aware, having been a regular commenter (along with myself) here for some time.
.
You might wish to reflect a bit on the effectiveness of your commentary in light of certain responses, in my humble opinion.

Hate to pop your conspiracy bubble, dollface, but that’d be the first time I’ve posted. (In retrospect, I’m a little sad my first impression’s being made in dealing with someone this crazy.) So my ‘repeated’ attempts to, er, minimize crime by apparently channeling Dick Cheney are in fact limited to… well, a sole instance of likening you to Michelle Bachmann. Indeed, it is as heinous a (minimized) crime as ordering the torture of detainees solely to elicit confessions the justify the unmitigated waste of life and resource that was the Iraq War. Have I no shame.

In short, your comparison is pure hyperbole and froth, with all the substance of a Fluffernutter, and a poor one at that. My comparison had grounds in that the levels of sheer crazy you and she produce knows no limit.

If you’d prefer, I can also translate this for you with the capslock on, a thesaurus in hand, and a few references to this Evita dame. It might make a little more sense.

“Whilst there are certainly trolls that populate commentary here with their fake arguments, I’m not one of them –a fact of which Oregon JC is aware, having been a regular commenter (along with myself) here for some time.

You might wish to reflect a bit on the effectiveness of your commentary in light of certain responses, in my humble opinion.
stuartzechman
September 1, 2009″
———-
Interestingly and most importantly, it is my sincere and humble opinion (and observation) that the effectiveness and sincerity of my comments is not determined or minimized by any attempts to deflect from same by emm “different” commenters using the same “verbiage” tack, anticipated and and repeated approach.

Some crass, insulting comments are not unexpected on a public forum.
However, those “commenters” do not impact or change the issues which I will continue to post about– on a site such as this one–an elite site run by reporters of this caliber.

It is my humble opinion and experience that such repeated “commenters” do nothing to limit the sincerity of the posts I make– and do not alter the need I repeatedly articulate here for a sustained and vigorous investigation, prosecution and incarceration of Eve Sharon Moore aka Shay Riley of the website”BlackFemaleInterracialMarriage” blog, a vile felon, Predator and likely Pedophile.

I have included again an excerpt from my initial post on this matter.

“CRIMINALS, PEDOPHILES, CHILD MOLESTERS, TRAFFICKERS IN CHILD PRONOGRAPHY, CHILD SEX TRADERS, STALKERS AND and VIOLENT PREDATORS now use the web and telephone to prey with stunning zeal on unwitting law abiding citizens including and especially CHILDREN.
The sudden explosion of the web cannot obscure the need to continue a sustained and thorough investigation of criminals like this woman and others of her ilk.”

PS: You say you are not a troll, good for you.

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

I am a practiced reader who studies commentary and writing style for legal reasons so despite your failed attempt to minimize the seriousness of the issues I raise– there is ONE PERSON (a very criminal savvy Internet hoodlum) making comment after comment, arguing with “themselves” and re commenting, adding aliases, changing leaving returning—a study in online “depravity”–in this case also, desperation.
~
You’ve made this allegation in the past. Care to enlighten us as to which specific commenters are one and the same?

Agnomina
~
Actually, I think lawyer mommy is one of yours. From what little I can gather amid the rubble of her lunacy, she is a bit to the left of the center…A long, long bit.

Exiled_At_Home –

See, there’s left of center, and then there’s someone proudly blazing trails into the left wilderness, where no self-respecting liberal would attempt to go. O Pioneers, indeed.

Agnomina
~
Actually, I think lawyer mommy is one of yours. From what little I can gather amid the rubble of her lunacy, she is a bit to the left of the center…A long, long bit.
Exiled_At_Home…
September 1, 2009
______

You can disagree with my comments without resorting to attacking whole groups of people. The Internet is a fertile hiding place for Eve Sharon Moore of the website “Black Female Interracial Marriage blog”, a felon, Predator and likely Pedophile, an online THUG whom I want vigorously investigated, prosecuted and jailed.

The “lunacy” which you so glibly refer is a real ailment of hundreds of people here in the US. In an effort to discredit valid remarks it is quite idiotic to insult a whole group of those in the population who are mentally ill (or disabled).

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

Agnomina
~
Actually, I think lawyer mommy is one of yours. From what little I can gather amid the rubble of her lunacy, she is a bit to the left of the center…A long, long bit.
Exiled_At_Home…
September 1, 2009

You can disagree with my comments without resorting to attacking whole groups of people. The Internet is a fertile hiding place for Eve Sharon Moore of the website “Black Female Interracial Marriage blog”, a felon whom I want vigorously investigated, prosecuted and jailed.

The “lunacy” which you so glibly refer is a real ailment of hundreds of people here in the US. In an effort to discredit valid remarks it is quite stupid to insult a whole group of those in the population who are mentally ill (or disabled).

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

[...] about health care reform–surely a bad sign. Right-wing nutjobs are taking the opportunity to proclaim the start of a conservative counter-revolution, and some pundits are predicting massive Democratic [...]

I just noticed that Lmom’s link is red when it’s after a line break and not red when there is no line break.

So maybe try hitting enter before inserting the link makes it red?

lawyermommy
~
Did you just seriously suggest that I refrain from mentioning your lunacy because that is somehow insulting to the mentally ill? Che cazzo! Listen, dear, I don’t simply disagree with you. Your rantings are indicative of patent insanity, nothing more. Disagreeing with you would suggest that you actually have posited some substantive notion worth debating, unfortunately not the case. Have you posted any comment in the Swamp without mentioning your online stalker? Are there online predators? Yes. We’re all aware. Shouting your story over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over…Lunacy.

“ExliedNeo”:

A response to “you” is hardly worthwhile.

Below, I have pasted the boorish remark in response to me:

“Agnomina
~
Actually, I think lawyer mommy is one of yours. From what little I can gather amid the rubble of her lunacy, she is a bit to the left of the center…A long, long bit.
Exiled_At_Home…
September 1, 2009″

The remarks to you which I made in my initial comment in response to your above still hold true and will not change. Lunacy in the pejorative context used in a quest to sarcastically deflect from my valid post is inhumane. There ARE many Americans who are mentally ill (or disabled).
Their mental condition should not provide fodder for your crude diatribe. You sound like a boorish monster– devoid of any modicum of humanity.

Most people do not know just how easily your phone can be tapped and computer usage trailed by Pedophiles, Child Porn distributors, molesters and other vile
and criminally technically adroit criminals like this woman Eve Sharon Moore of the website “Blackfemaleintercialmarriage blog” and others of her ilk. See her on http://www.akbarshabzz.com

Also, “Exiledneo”, I have as much right as you do to comment here and I will keep commenting on this blog on posts and issues which interest me– in the same sincere forthright manner I have always done.
You do not have to read my posts!
LM

_______________________________
I am informing people of the little known enormous–and easily available technology– that has made it VERY easy for Pedophiles, Predators, monsters and other sex offenders to wiretap phones, criminally track, violently harass, kidnap and violently rape and molest law abiding folk especially children.

PS: >>cut and paste into your menu bar:
1. htttp://www.wthr.com/Global/story.asp?s=9346833”
Both provide some general information on phone taps.
2. http://www.flexispy.com/spyphone-flexispy-apple-iphone.htm

Thanks

http://theblindspotsofgod.wordpress.com/

What do you know- Lmom was trying to help all along. She just coded her response to ifthethundadontgetya in crazy, thus slyly alluding to the thread topic re. Glen Beck. Brilliant!

FWIW, the only time I’ve ever gotten a red hyperlink is when I typed ‘(link)’ after my insertion, thus making me look like an idiot. I personally believe that hyperlink red is only used maliciously to try and humiliate word press users. No doubt a plan conceived and set in motion by the Shay Rileybot.