Church Committee Redux?

Christopher Hayes, the Nation’s DC editor, has a long essay out explaining the history of the Church Committee, which was one of the most remarkable products in the history of any Democratic system of checks and balances. As a result of the committee’s work, we now know, as Hayes explains:

[T]he CIA contracted a Mafia boss to murder Fidel Castro, sent biotoxins to the Republic of Congo with orders to poison Patrice Lumumba and tested LSD on unsuspecting citizens (one of whom jumped out of a window to his death). It fomented coups and bloodshed against democratically elected governments, while the National Security Agency, in coordination with the major telegram companies, read every single telegram coming in or going out of the country for three decades. The FBI infiltrated peaceful antiwar groups, breaking up marriages of activists with forged evidence of infidelity, while surveilling civil rights leaders with an assortment of bugs and break-ins. It even attempted to blackmail Martin Luther King Jr. into committing suicide, shipping him tapes of him midcoitus with a mistress and a note that said, “There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.”

Hayes argues that it is time for another Church Committee to investigate the excesses of the Bush Administration. He also gets at a central historical fact that is key to understanding the governing philosophy of Dick Cheney, who had lived through, with disapproval, the reforms that followed the Church Committee as a former Richard Nixon staffer and Gerald Ford chief of staff. The view of the Bush Administration, as demonstrated through their actions on a variety of legal issues, was that the Church Committee reforms, on foreign surveillance, on limiting executive power, on restricting assassinations, had been a mistake, dangerously limiting the power of the president to defend the nation against threats foreign and domestic. Even the rhetoric that Cheney used echoes the pre-Church rhetoric of the Cold War. Hayes points to the words of the Doolittle Report, which was given to Dwight Eisenhower in 1954, leading the way to many of the worst U.S. abuses. Said the report:

It is now clear that we are facing an implacable enemy whose avowed objective is world domination by whatever means and at whatever cost. There are no rules in such a game. Hitherto acceptable norms of human conduct do not apply. If the United States is to survive, long-standing American concepts of “fair play” must be reconsidered.

As Cheney put in on Meet The Press, just five days after the 2001 attacks on Washington and New York:

We also have to work, though, sort of the dark side, if you will. We’ve got to spend time in the shadows in the intelligence world. A lot of what needs to be done here will have to be done quietly, without any discussion, using sources and methods that are available to our intelligence agencies, if we’re going to be successful. That’s the world these folks operate in, and so it’s going to be vital for us to use any means at our disposal, basically, to achieve our objective.

Read Hayes’ entire essay here.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Secret

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    SAUL LOEB / AFP / Getty Images

    A Tale of Two Economies: Mitt Romney vs. Republican Governors

    The great recession has left the state of Ohio battered and bruised–and Mitt Romney would have you believe it’s Barack Obama’s fault. Writing in the Cleveland Plain-Dealer on May 4, Romney advised Ohioans that the President has delivered them “paltry results,” and that their state is in need of “a fundamental change in direction.”

  • grape_crush

    So, Michael, what’s your opinion on this? Yea or Nay on a Church Committee Redux? In your opinion, is something like this warranted?

    Or is the answer to those questions something which we must somehow glean from the fact you’re even mentioning this?

  • rustyreturns

    I would be in favor of a Church-like committee. I do believe the power of the Executive Branch has gone out of control. Has become way too powerful with few restrictions and oversight by the Legislative Branch. Not so much with the example given here by Michael about Bush/Cheney, but Obama’s current use of “Czars”.
    .
    Cooper-Church and Case-Church admendments did restrict Executive Powers, mainly on the ability to declare war or use FBI / CIA as an intervention.
    .
    Perhaps a Church Committee should be used first to investigate and release information on the Bush years, but to also look into the current mis-use of powers by the Obama Administration before it is left to go the next 3+ years unchecked.

  • hotbbq

    I say go for it. The name alone will get the right-wing crank cases on board. Their willful ignorance may actually serve a useful purpose for a change.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    We don’t need a new Church comittee. We just need to reread the original report in light of everything we’re experienced since.
    .
    As I asked Joe in an earlier thread, what restraints do we want to put on our intelligence operatives if the US Code is inadequate to the task?
    .
    Absent controls, abuse is ineveitable.

  • http://ktheintz.wordpress.com/ kth

    Critics of the Church Committee (like James Baker, who on 9/11/01 blamed the attacks on the Church Committee, before the literal dust had settled) have never been able to point to a single American life saved by allowing knuckle-draggers cut from the same cloth as Gordon Liddy and Oliver North to run amok in the CIA.

  • sacredh

    I’m sure some of the critics of the Church Committee are wetting their pants over the upcoming investigations into torture abuses. Even though the investigations are only supposed to focus on those who exceeded the guidelines, does anyone really think that those who are slated to take the fall aren’t going to do everything they possibly can to implicate higher ups?
    .
    Remember the investigation into Clinton’s alleged Whitewater role? They expanded into Travelgate, Hillary’s billing records, Vince Foster and they wound up focusing on a blowjob. There’s no reason to think the investigations into torture abuses won’t be dramatically expanded. The next few years should be tons of fun (if you’re a democrat).

  • rustyreturns

    “Remember the investigation into Clinton’s alleged Whitewater role? They expanded into Travelgate, Hillary’s billing records, Vince Foster…”
    .
    Yes I do very well, and Hillary is still in the limelight of politics, albeit under tight wraps by Obama, and Bill is flittering all over the world ‘saving reporters’.
    .
    Justice it seems is always reserved for Republicans who are questioned about their actions. Especially in the liberal Media.

  • Joe Bftsplk

    Isn’t this a Truth Comission?
    And if so, what’s new here? Will this editorial help to get it created?
    As for me, I hope so. Such a thing would be a good and necessary first step on the way to restoring our nation’s moral integrity.

  • sacredh

    The republicans turned the Whitewater investigation into a never ending witch hunt. It’s payback time. The republicans always whine about the “high crimes” Clinton allegedly perpetrated and yet the only thing they could come up with after years and years of investigations, tens of millions of dollars of tax payer money spent, hundreds of investigators and tying up congress was a blowjob. It’s our turn now and the crimes are much more serious than a hum job. My only fear is that Cheney will have a heart attack and croak before it reaches him.

  • Joe Bftsplk

    Yes, sacredh, I’m hoping that going after the small fry is a tactic to garner both outcry and better cases against the big fish.
    Although as of now I’m doing more hoping than expecting.

  • sacredh

    Joe, I’m also hoping that once we get our foot in the door that the investigations will take on a life of their own. Holder has to know that once it all starts that it’s going to shoot off in all directions. One thing is going to lead to another. Who knows, maybe Cheney has his own hummer that he’s hiding. Please God, don’t let it be with a woman.

  • rustyreturns

    Why a “Truth Commission” when Obama’s main theme in his foreign policy is “appeasement” and “apology” for past so-called indiscretions by the United States.
    .
    I for one think that restoring our integrity ala Ronald Reagan, “Mr Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL”. Does far more good than Obama’s “America Has Shown Arrogance” or this goody “We Have Not Been Perfect”. But, the best of all, “Our Own Darker Periods in Our History”. Obama Apology
    .

  • momentomaury

    Keep posting hula.
    .
    With every post you reveal what a hateful little worm you are. A small-minded, heartless little man who warms his lonely days with insults and nasty little puns. A man whose only joy is in the death of others. Whether it be a man who dedicated his life to national service, a nation of people with the misfortune to be led by a despot, or a robber shot by store owner who wished he didn’t need to. These are the only times when hula seems happy.
    .
    And like the vast swathes of his ilk, he’s paranoid. There are people out to get him. There are people trying to take his money and his freedom. Trying to tell him what to do and what to think. He fights this fear by lashing out in anger at any who – in his delusional state – are perceived as being those out to get him. The educated, the foreign, those who worship other gods or hold different beliefs, all these people are simply those that are conspiring to shackle his spirit and enemies to be destroyed.
    .
    But keep posting hula. We need to know who you are. We to remember that you are out there. We need to be reminded there is little chance of reconciling with you. And we need to realize that you, or someone like you, is the next Timothy McVeigh, the next Ted Kaczynski, the next Lee Harvey Oswald.
    .
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
    .
    So keep posting hula, with my thanks. Hopefully, you’ll vent your frustrations here, and not in some other destructive manner.

  • ogliberal

    I think Obama should go a few steps further than simply emulating St. Ron. He should fly around the globe, swinging his c**k around, wearing a t-shirt that reads, “USA #1 – Everybody Else Sucks!”, chanting “What are you gonna do about it?” whenever he is challenged. He could follow this up by p**sing on our adversaries lawns and seducing their wives. To close, he can flex his biceps, growl, grap his package and yell, “I got your diplomacy for you right here!” All the while, Slipknot will be blasting in the background. And if anybody effs with him, he’ll have his army of 3,127 czars backing him up. You wanna piece of that, Glenn Beck?

  • sacredh

    Obama told Rahm he’d like to try a more subtle approach first.

blog comments powered by Disqus