The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry

This is how Washington really works: Even a top liberal advocate for taking a strong stand against the insurance industry takes money behind the scenes from the insurance industry.

On Sunday, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, who was once a nominee to be President Obama’s Secretary of Health And Human Services, appeared on NBC’s Meet The Press, playing the role of the liberal standard bearer, opposite Oklahoma conservative Sen. Tom Coburn. Daschle spoke out against insurers, praised the so-called “public option,” and at one point framed the debate over health reform to host David Gregory this way:

Well, David, I guess the, the basic question is, are we building this new system for the American people or for the insurance companies?  I mean, that’s really the key question.  How will they be better served?

Sounds like tough-talk from a man who was introduced on the show as “former Senate majority leader Democrat Tom Daschle, an informal adviser to the White House and author of ‘Critical:  What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.’ ” Left unmentioned was the fact that Daschle, in his capacity as a high-paid consultant at the law firm Alston and Bird, is once again working closely with lobbyists for UnitedHealth, the largest U.S. industry player, aiding the company’s effort to convince moderate Senate and House Democrats to, among other things, kill the public option and keep company profits high.

A couple weeks back, BusinessWeek reporters Chad Terhune and Keith Epstein confronted Daschle about his role playing both sides of the health care reform debate. (The entire piece, about how UnitedHealth has already won the health care reform war, is a must read.) Terhune and Epstein write:

[UnitedHealth top lobbyist Judah] Sommer has retained such influential outsiders as Tom Daschle, the former Democratic Senate Leader who now works for the large law and lobbying firm Alston & Bird. Daschle, a liberal from South Dakota, dropped out of the running to be Obama’s Secretary of Health & Human Services after disclosures that he failed to pay taxes on perks given to him by a private client. He advised UnitedHealth in 2007 and 2008 and resumed that role this year. Daschle personally advocates a government-run competitor to private insurers. But he sells his expertise to UnitedHealth, which opposes any such public insurance plan. Among the services Daschle offers are tips on the personalities and policy proclivities of members of Congress he has known for decades.

Conceding that he doesn’t always agree with his client, Daschle says: “They just want a description of the lay of the land, an assessment of circumstances as they appear to be as health reform unfolds.” He says he leaves direct contacts with members of Congress to others at his firm.

Now it is one thing for Daschle to make this convoluted argument–that he can at once advocate the public option while taking money to help those leading the charge to defeat it. It is quite another for Daschle to be allowed on a show like Meet The Press to talk about the insurance industry without any disclosure of the fact that he now works as a strategist for the insurance industry.

A few weeks back, there was quite a hubbub over MSNBC’s decision to allow Richard Wolffe, a former Newsweek reporter turned corporate consultant, to sit in the anchor chair while Keith Olbermann was on vacation. Olbermann later apologized for his producers not disclosing Wolffe’s conflict. Daschle’s Meet The Press appearence Sunday, however, shows the TV news business has a ways to go before such transparency is standardized.

UPDATE: For more on the much less secret life of Howard Dean, drug industry adviser, click here.

Related Topics: daschle, Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Pete Souza / The White House via Getty Images

    Political Picures of the Week, May 18-25

    TIME’s photo editors bring you the best pictures of the past week from the Beltway and beyond.

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    From left: AP; ABACAUSA

    The Phony War: Obama and Romney Are Debating Character, Not Policy

    More than five months from Election Day, the back-and-forth about Mitt Romney’s record at Bain already feels played out. Unfortunately, there’s good reason to expect the campaign continues in this vein indefinitely. Neither Barack Obama nor Mitt Romney are terribly interested in dwelling on policy platforms. Romney’s plan to slash spending and keep taxes low on the wealthy isn’t especially popular, at least not at any level of detail beyond a blithe promise to shrink the deficit. Meanwhile, Obama’s signature first-term achievements, like health care, the stimulus and Wall Street reform, are all unpopular or tricky to sell. (The Dodd-Frank bill is the most popular of these, but hyping it means offending wealthy donors.) So what we’re getting instead is a superficial duel about character–and, worse, one that’s based on the largely false premise that the better man can better “manage” the economy back to health.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Good catch……

  • rustyreturns

    And who here is really surprised by this?? This is exactly the reason most Americans oppose Healthcare Reform. We do not trust those in power or the players behind the scenes.
    .
    Thank you Michael for shedding some light on this very important revelation.
    .
    It is not about “helping the poor and those without healthcare insurance”. It is more about how can I reap millions out of a situation and line my pockets with tax payer dollars.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    The tragedy Scherer, is that you think the only problem was Daschle’s non-disclosure. What about the fact that only one person came prepared to discuss facts in a news show, while all the rest were their to indulge in spin. I care a lot more about the fact that Gregory wasn’t prepared to challenge any positions and while Rachel’s performance was admirable, and her intellect formidable, I think it’s a bit much pitting one lone voice of reason against 4 distinctly unreasonable ones. Talk about David and Goliath…

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    You are such a despicable opportunists because you are clearly not on the side of reform for any reason.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Your outrage seems pretty selective there Rusty. You oppose reform because you don’t trust Tom Daschle but your absolutely OK with United Heathcare’s role in buying their way into the legislature?

    Seems to me, that the arrangment pretty much argues (against my own judgment on another thread) for a complete slapdown of the insurance industry, not their preservation.

  • bitterpill8

    MS: This is a good piece. After all the embarrassment caused by Daschle during his “unconfirmation” one would think NBC would have the sense to keep him off their panel of message massagers. But then why do I expect so little from MTP?

    The Senators past and present who have role in the health care debate are shining examples of a conflict of interest. Do these people know the meaning of “shame”?

  • sevenoaks07

    I am confused. Has rustyreturns undergone a transplant? His contribution makes sense, Are they a blatant form of double talk?

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Moreover, the more I think about this the more pissed i am. Where’s the story about the corporate takeover of the debate in general. The entire weekend on CNN brought to us by the industry mouth piece American for Prosperity. give me a break Michael. Is it wrong not to disclose Diastole, year, but let’s not act like not knowing the guy who is working for the industry who holds a view that is in opposition to the people he works for, is any whee near on par with the blatant health insurance invasion of the town halls, and the entire media narrative surrounding this debate. My God, are really going to imply that it’s the Democrats that are being duplicitously against real reform? that’s not cynical that’s what you call obscene.
    .
    And we want to complain about Michael Vick? Shiny object anyone?

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    oops that’s “disclose Daschle”

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    Rusty is a physician. The health care debate is the ONE area where his actual experience prevents his imagination from running away with him.

  • James, Los Angeles

    Man Carrying An Assault Rifle And Pistol Outside Obama Event | LiveWire TPM

    Just a couple of years ago, people were arrested –literally arrested — for having an anti-Bush bumper sticker on their car anywhere around a Bush event; for wearing a T-shirt with the number of Iraq dead in the House gallery.

    And now these lunatics are bring assault weapons to a town hall on HEALTH insurance reform.

    What is wrong with this picture?

  • pneogy

    “This is how Washington really works: Even a top liberal advocate for taking a strong stand against the insurance industry in the health reform fight takes money behind the scenes from the insurance industry.”

    I am not so sure that I quite understand MS’s outrage. Private citizen Daschle believes (and he has made no secret of his belief) that the insurance industry’s role needs to be curbed. He also makes a living providing his expertise to all parties to make the health care system better. Why shouldn’t he provide his services to the insurance industry? Does his working with the insurance industry in any capacity whatever necessarily go against his effort to limit the role of the insurance industry?

  • Matt

    Which makes Howard Dean look even better in this debate. Is Dean once again the latest Dem superstar?

    Quite the comeback from the scream…

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • James, Los Angeles

    Nice piece on pretty well-known stuff relevant to Dashcle, Scherer. I’ll wait to see if you can do the same unraveling of the extensive web of Dick Armey connections. Eh?

    I’ll bet THAT would be interesting. Didn’t they appear on the same show?

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    MS’s outrage actually refers to the booker’s on MTP allowing him on the show without any of this being disclosed. As a media criticism it’s dead-on.

  • palininatowel

    Unfortunately, this about sums up the nature of the Senate these days. Political party designation means much less than a list of contributing lobbyists and industries.

    All the talk about Democrats having a “filibuster-proof majority” was inane drivel. When the majority includes the likes of Evan Bayh, Ben Nelson, Baucus, Carper, Specter(!) and others, the very idea of a “filibuster-proof majority” becomes laughable.

    Cash is king. (Along with self-interest and self-preservation.)

    And that’s why a public option or single-payer were never realistic possibilities.

    Hell, Obama is lucky he got Sotomayor through, the way these sell-out senators act.

  • pneogy

    Media criticism with the title “The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry?” That’s way too subtle for me.

  • donovong

    Why not an attempt to provide a “fair and balanced” view of things, MS? Why not give the same sort of analysis of Dick Armey’s connections and outright lies?

  • http://derekg.wordpress.com/ Derek

    I be more interested in the motivations of those currently in office, than a former politician, which in Michael’s case, will likely focus on Democrats. Perhaps someone else could explore the connections between the private insurers and current Republicans, who are working hard to kill health insurance for those less fortunate than they.

  • freeinpa

    The main point with Daschle is summed up by the old yarn ” We established what you are. Now we are just negotiating price”

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    That’s what I’m saying. all this finger pointing at Daschle but not one freaking word about disclosure of Armey’s connection to the town halls (unless of course it came from Rachel and in that context media bookers are not off the hook), not one word about Coburn’s campaign contributions. why is the outrage only directed at items that present the right with a tactical advantage and nothing that detracts. In fact the whole point of this story is to distract from the real story the content of the show, for that we get zip, nada, not a single freakin word.

  • freeinpa

    What wrong with the picture? You fail to acknowledge that folks were arrested for anti-Obama bumper stickers.http://thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2009/04/get-rid-of-that-anti-obama-bumper.html

    Or the vendor who lost his lease at a mall because he sold anti-Obama material.

    And speaking about deaths in Iraq ( Afghanistan) why is that not front page news anymore? The media still gives him a pass while the community organizer has found out that it is easier to criticize something than to do something. Hmmm sounds like his health care approach

  • plukasiak

    the real question here is, why is Scherer only now writing about Daschle’s connections with UHC (widely considered the lowest of the major insurance parasites). Progressive have known about it since Daschle was first mentioned as health care czar (and the non-Oborg progressives saw Daschle’s appointment as a sign of how not serious Obama was about reform) and weren’t heartbroken when Daschle got forced to withdraw.
    _
    But Daschle’s relationship with UHC should have been at the front of every story about health care when Daschle was slated to be czar — but it wasn’t. Scherer and his cronies protected Daschle — and only now do they deem it appropriate to “reveal” how tainted Daschle really is….

  • shepherdwong

    “Why not give the same sort of analysis of Dick Armey’s connections and outright lies?”
    .
    Because “kick the Democrat” is still the favorite blood sport of beltway journos. Obviously, Maddow was the only one there without naked conflicts of interest. If media types like Scherer actually understood their jobs, they’d point out the important truth that, while Coburn and Armey were doing their well-paid whoring for corporate interests, only Daschle had the integrity to tell the public the thing that the insurance industry hates the most – in spite of being on the payroll.

  • freeinpa

    After the abuse Bush took for 8 years from the press, bloggers and left wing nuts jobs, you think this is a blood sport. Oh PLeeeeaase! Libs would hide in the basement crying.

    And you are proud that Daschle is being paid by a group and then bashes it? Even for a demo that is hypocrisy or prostitution

  • James, Los Angeles

    What I meant was they should arrest these doofus clowns for disorderly conduct.

  • stuartzechman

    http://twitter.com/JimDeMint
    .
    @JimDeMint :

    About to go on FoxNews Cavuto to discuss healthcare and how co-ops are a public option by another name
    12 minutes ago from TwitterBerry

  • http://twitter.com/michaelscherer Michael Scherer
  • stuartzechman

    While Tom Daschle’s credibility (and integrity) has always been less than nil (a fact that the liberal blogosphere has known forever), that is the least of health reform’s problems at the moment:
    .

    Mandate For Backlash
    .
    by digby
    .
    Dean Baker raises a very important point about health care reform without a public option: what happens to the mandate? He argues that for political reasons, if they jettison the public plan, the Democrats should not include mandates either, since they will only line the pockets of the insurance companies until the political pressure becomes so great that a public option will have to be formed anyway. The best thing would be to get rid of mandates now and bring that day closer.
    .
    In my view the Democrats are playing with fire in the worst way if they institute mandates without offering any option for reasonably priced insurance. In effect, they will be telling all the people who are currently uninsured that unless they buy unaffordable policies upfront (for which they may receive some money back at the end of the year when they file their taxes
    [Note: that's if their families make under 88k that year]) that they must not just live in fear of getting sick — they are now criminals. I can’t think of a more politically inflammatory thing to do at a time like this. And the right will demagogue this thing in a way that makes Sicko look subtle by comparison.

  • rose83

    MS, great media criticism.

  • pafro

    To further plukasiak, if “liberal” Tom Daschle (who sure has a lot of “centrist” positions for being such a pinko liberal) tried to show his face at t any meet up of real liberals, he might just run out the door under fire from rotten tomatoes. We’ve known about this sleazy behavior and didn’t like it from day one. We wanted Dean for HHS, remember.
    Scherer always calls these milquetoast centrist Lieberdems liberals because he knows how grating it is and he probably gets all sorts of guffaws around the office when he does it.

  • constantweader

    Gee, I wonder if this is why it looked like Rachel Maddow was in there all by her lonesome fending off baloney sausage from Dick Armey & Tom Coburn. Even host Washington Insider Milquetoast, who doesn’t normally rock the boat, was more pointed in his challenges to the Republicans than was Daschle.

    (Of course, far be it from Gregory to upset his fair & balanced round table by mentioning his panel consisted of three for the insurance companies and one for the rest of the American public. Luckily, the one standing up for us was Rachel Maddow, who should have had Gregory’s job in the first place.)

    The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

  • freeinpa

    Local police said it’s legal under Arizona law, but two officers kept close by him

    Nothing disorderly just a citizen exercising his rights

  • shepherdwong

    You mean the psychopath who stole the presidency with a “conservative” judicial coup, went brush clearin’ while the terrorists finished their plans for 9/11 , lied us into an unnecessary trillion-dollar war and nearly collapsed the global economy by giving Wall Street free reign? Somehow, I missed the important story that was all over the noooze.

  • shepherdwong

    Not surprisingly, that’s exactly right. Mandates to buy private insurance with no other option are political suicide. That’s why I tend to think it will be all or nothing at the end of the day. Obama will share some blame if reform fails but he’ll take it square on the chin (along with the rest of the party) for bad legislation that gets passed.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Euthanasia clause revised for Obamacare Lite, sides agree Neil Diamond’s new Forever In Mom Jeans tune equal to early AARP snuff proviso.

    http://twitter.com/HULAgate

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Lab stats show that even a single wine spritzer at Trader Klein’s, er, Vic’s exponentially increases a woman’s chances of getting breast cancer.

    So when do we nuke California?

    I’m just saying.

    http://twitter.com/HULAgate

  • shepherdwong

    Hey, a liberal, a centrist and two “conservatives” is the most “balanced” gab-fest panel I’ve seen on MTP like, forever. Thumbs up for having Maddow on, thumbs down for spending an hour on health care policy without a single expert on health care policy.

  • notfooledbydistractions

    Good deal, I applaud your efforts.

    You covered one side – now, how about dishing the dirt on that slime ball “Dick” Armey and his connections to the so-call grassroots organizations like FreedomWorks, etc. Rachel Maddow has done most of the hard investigative work – why not publish something similar to fill the lemmings following the FreedomWorks lead in on just exactly who is prompting their unrest. Now there’s some real despicable work going on there. I think most folks would be embarrassed that they’ve been duped by such an organizaton.

  • ogliberal

    @sz

    And that’s exactly what Demint and the rest of the right will do with anything that isn’t “deregulate the insurance industry and give more tax cuts to the rich”. Anything positive, anything that can show that government can actually help Americans with important stuff like healthcare, anything that can make Obama and the Dems look good will be called “tyranny”. My guess is that the WH is softening its stance on the public option because they don’t have enough Dem votes to get a plan with it through the Senate. But the buck has to stop there. They aren’t going to win over any GOP votes except maybe – maybe – the ladies from Maine. (and they’ll only get them if there is no public option) Folks like Baucus and Conrad have already gone on the record as being in support of co-ops. If they then backtrack on that stance in the face of further demagoguing from the right, it will time to smack them down publicly and/or go the reconciliation route.

  • shepherdwong

    “And you are proud that Daschle is being paid by a group and then bashes it? Even for a demo that is hypocrisy or prostitution.”
    .
    If he can take the john’s money for some sweet talk and a hand job while prostitutes like Baucus and Conrad feel the need to get down on all fours, I say more power to him.

  • James, Los Angeles

    Not that MS is obligated to report on the substance of the show, but I think if he is going to do a long post wringing his hands about Dashcle’s beltway connections, he might mention the even more egregious inside money connections of Dick Armey. At least Dashcle didn’t lie about his on the air. Armey did.

    Dick Armey is hugely popular with the beltway media, print AND broadcast. They love him in the same way they love McCain. He was a “guest blogger” on Swampland a couple of years back, though he didn’t write his own columns. A beltway journo told me at the time how journos flocked after Armey while he was in office, and that hasn’t changed since he’s been working the other side of the street. They gush and titter and go on about his “great sense of humor.” Yes, I was incredulous, too.

    I have the feeling this is a full-court beltway press about MADDOW’s discrediting of Armey on the air. She exposed him for a liar. They are throwing this flak up in order not to talk about Armey’s blatant lying on Meet The Press. It’s pretty obvious.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Universal health care only works if you believe no-fault insuring of druggies, drunks, rapists, and racists works outside of Hyannisport.

  • James, Los Angeles

    Yeah it was legal to have anti-Bush bumper stickers too but they still got arrested.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Yellow Dogs dims now openly campaigning against Pelosi, despercraps in deep doo disarray, Obama busy splainin unilateral communism to VFW.

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    Same whining White House geniuses that want to take over health care unsure how spam mail sent from, by, for DNC HQ… http://bit.ly/Xg3Ym

  • http://www.hulagate.org hulagate

    EPA estimates only 4 million trees to be killed to print latest revision of Obama health care scam, should be ready for non-reading by May.

  • http://singlepayerwestchester.wordpress.com/2009/08/17/the-state-of-reform/ The State of Reform « Single Payer Westchester

    [...] from TIME on Tom Daschle’s connections to the industry begins with the sentence “This is how Washington really works: Even a top liberal advocate for taking a strong stand against the insurance industry takes money [...]

  • shepherdwong

    Of course, that’s why we pay more than twice as much for health care compared to countries with universal systems and they still have much better health outcomes. You’re brainwashed.

  • freeinpa

    Democrats Health Care Takeover -0
    American People – 2

    Demos owned WH, Congress and Senate both times

    Impotent or Incompetent? You decide

  • carpevis

    I guess what gets me about this whole tit-for-tat political BS this story exemplifies is the fact that no one seems to focus on what the point is. Whether the Republicans are out there playing the double-standard or the Democrats are out there playing the double standard, it’s time we the people focused on what’s wrong with health care and TELL these bozos in Congress what to do.

    I’ve had it up to here with all the politicizing of the health care issue. Bottom line is as long as it remains, in ANY WAY a ‘for profit’ venture, we will NEVER see meaningful health care reform. EVER.

    Making money above and beyond operating costs is what consumes doctors today – we have so few general practitioners because they all want to specialize. That’s where the money is. Big Pharma is out to sell us pills we don’t need and with dubious benefit because (they say) it takes so long and costs so much to create a drug that works. The trouble is, they HAVE drugs that cure cancer, cure diseases, fix all that ails you, but they WILL NOT INVEST IN THEM because they don’t want CURES. They want to SELL DRUGS. (For example, ten years ago, the news was talking all about the breakthrough discovery of a protein unique to cancer. ALL cancers. ONE protein. It had no other apparent function. That protein could be used to make a vaccine that could, literally, cure cancer. They did it in lab mice. Where is that today? TEN YEARS later? Reason: Vaccines are CHEAP to make. A cancer cure wouldn’t allow them to continue to create and charge exorbitant fees for the hit-and-miss, toxic cancer treatments we have today.)

    Take OUT that profit motive and we can all have affordable, safe, effective health care for everyone at a fraction of today’s costs.

    But that takes revamping the entire health care industry. Privatizing the Pharma companies, paying off investors in insurance, medical practices, manufacturing and other aspects of health care. Capping salaries, promoting the medical field as a place to work and even a takeover of the entire thing by the government to reorganize could also be needed. “But, that’s being a ‘socialist’!” you rage. To which I respond, “Yeah, it is, and your point being?”

    My point is, any health care reform that doesn’t put a cap on insurance, pharma and other profits in the health care industry will fail. Eliminating the profits, removing investor interests, taking the profit-based cost out and putting the actual cost in should be the way to go. I’m not saying it should be free, either. It SHOULD be affordable, though.

    Eliminate the profit, charge what the actual costs are, use insurance simply as a clearinghouse to offset or spread out the charges based on income and move on. If that’s socialist, then fine. Deal with it.

  • stuartzechman

    Demos owned WH, Congress and Senate both times
    Impotent or Incompetent? You decide

    .
    Can’t really argue with that at all.

  • jcapan

    “What I’m trying to do as I write and speak out against the insurance industry I was a part of for nearly two decades is to inform Americans that when they hear isolated stories of long waiting times to see doctors in Canada and allegations that care in other systems is rationed by ‘government bureaucrats,’ someone associated with the insurance industry wrote the original script.”

    Former CIGNA employee Wendell Potter on CNN.com of all places

  • FlownOver

    Neither impotent nor incompetent. In fact, they’re quite competent and wholly effective in achieving their objective – selling out ordinary Americans, just like the guys across the aisle.

  • http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/politics-religion-society/33189-congrats-teabaggers-republicans-2.html#post767119 Congrats to the teabaggers and the Republicans – Page 2 – SLUniverse Forums

    [...] article in Time about Tom Daschle: The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry – Swampland – TIME.com [...]

  • freeinpa

    And so did folks with Anti-Obama bumper stickers. So is there a point or just pissing and moaning

  • freeinpa

    You mean the psychopath who stole the presidency with a “conservative” judicial coup,

    The media reported the results of the study during the week after November 12, 2001. The results of the study showed that had the limited county by county recounts requested by the Gore team been completed, Bush would still have been the winner of the election.

    The New York Times did its own analysis of how mistaken overvotes might have been caused by confusing ballot designs. It found that the butterfly ballot in heavily Democratic Palm Beach County may have cost Gore a net 6286 votes, and the two page ballot in similarly Democratic Duval County may have cost him a net 1999 votes, each of which would have made the difference by itself.[5] The rest of the media consortium did not consider these because there could be no clear determination of a voter’s intent.

    READ IT AND WEEP IT WAS DUMMO STUPIDITY ON EITHER COUNT IN WHAT GORE CHOSE OR GENIUS WHO DESIGNED THE BALLOTS

    went brush clearin’ while the terrorists finished their plans for 9/11
    AND IF CLINTON GAVE UP CIGAR DIPPING MAYBE HE WOULD HAVE TAKEN BIN LADEN WHEN OFFERED
    , lied us into an unnecessary trillion-dollar war and nearly collapsed the global economy by giving Wall Street free reign?
    GOOD THING WE HAD FANNIE MAE ANF FREDDIIE MAC PROTECTED FROM FRAUD BY BARNEY FRANK, FRANKLIN RAINES, JAMIE GORELICK(ALSO of BIN LADEN FAME) AND WHO BANKRUPTED THE AUTO COS.
    Somehow, I missed the important story that was all over the noooze. DIDN’T MISS ITYOU CHOOSE TO IGNORE REALITY

  • freeinpa

    Flown over

    It the libs here are to be believed, Dumos are not nearly as competent in selling out the “ordinary citizens” as you call them. Repubs passed tax cuts and de-regulation several times Dummos still whacking at health care.

    Maybe instead of degrading Repubs you ought to make a cogent argument to them that health care reform makes sense since it seems they can get things passed

  • ohiolib

    This is why I’m cynical of everyone until proven otherwise.

  • plukasiak

    unfortunately, without a mandate, “community rating” is impossible, and without “community rating”, the exclusion of pre-existing conditions means that your group rates go up every time someone in your group gets sick.
    _
    In the real workd, this means that the effort to determine whether a prospective employee has any expensive illnesses or pre-existing conditions will become a big part of the hiring process — and people with disabilities will find it even harder to get work.

  • y4real

    This whole episode could be avoided if readers were aware of the contents in the link below.

    http://docs.google.com/View?id=d946wsj_63gngn8zcj

  • tffletch

    Thank goodness he is not Sec of HHS, although I’m not sure about Sebelius after her comments.

    I suppose Dashele was supposed to be the Dem representative in contrast to the repub sen (I don’t remember who he was).

    What about The Matthews show politics fix segment – Susan Page and Clarence Page were nailing the coffin on the Public Option. Maybe they will be right (but not without a fight), but it is amazing how pleased the MSM seems to be by Obama’s apparent backing off.

    .

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly Neo)

    While I understand the criticism of MS based on the desire to see more pointed analysis of Dick Armey, there is a vast distinction between GOP health-insurance lobbyists and Democrats in similar positions. While it is quite known that Armey is/was a lobbyist, it is also known that he is against these latest health-care reform proposals. Not much of a story, if you ask me. Headline: “GOP health-insurance operative opposes health-care reform.” Ooo, I didn’t see that coming! However, when you have an alleged proponent of health-care reform who just so happens to work for a major health-insurance lobby it is illustrative of just how unlikely reform really is. Those who oppose health-reform work for the insurance companies, but also some of those who ‘support’ health-reform work for the insurance companies. So, either way reform goes it is likely to support insurance company interests. Couple this with Obama’s closed-door agreement with Pharma and there is a trend developing that suggests there is little hope for honest reform. Is this a swipe at Democrats? No. You can call, from your partisan armchairs, for more indepth coverage of GOP/health insurance relationships but that would only cover the obvious: that those who oppose reform do so at the behest of lobbyists. When MS notes that those who support reform are also working on behalf of the same lobbyists it is quite revealing.

  • hills5102

    Not that I expected Daschle to have firepower– because we all know he lost out on being Secy of HEW because of these relationships–but this piece completely explains Daschle’s wimpy performance on Meet the Press.

    How can you possibly speak with passion and eloquence if you are being paid by the very people you are criticizing? It’s not possible. Howard Dean has fire when he talks–he means what he says and he says it clearly, succinctly, passionately. Daschle can’t. Bernie Saunders speaks with passion because he feels it. Daschle doesn’t. He’d rather get paid by United Health, one of the worst health care companies on the planet, than take a stand for people’s lives. The fact that the Dems put him on as a mouthpiece for this issue is an unfortunate sign of what is to come.

  • spikeseven

    He is the whoryest of whores.

    Seems like no one in politics has any decency.

  • http://www.suijurisclub.net/office-information-retrieval/5674-tom-daschle-moonlighting-insurance-companies.html#post34277 Tom Daschle Moonlighting for the Insurance Companies! – suijurisclub.net

    [...] Daschle Moonlighting for the Insurance Companies! The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry – Swampland – TIME.com This is the same man who had to reject his nomination as Secretary of Health because he owed over [...]

  • freeinpa

    Daschle didn’t lose out because of his relationship to lobbyists. He lost out because he was the sacrificial lamb for the long list of tax cheats that Obama put into his adminstration

  • shepherdwong

    Let’s not overgeneralize about the Dems, shall we. Unlike Republicans, they aren’t a wholly-owned subsidiary of corp. inc. but there are still enough red state and flyover country Blue Dogs to prevent progressives/liberals from moving the people’s business forward. The problem is “conservatives” and Reagan corporatist “conservatism”. It always is.

  • freeinpa

    shepherdwong:

    You state not to overgeneralize about Democrats but feel perfectly entitled to label all Republicans.(Do you actually no any?) Dumos are wholly-owned by Unions and lawyers and every victim group that they can conjure up.

    Where exactly would liberals get the money for all the hare-brained schemes they foist on the public without corporations? They cut and run defending this country and cut in run when the crap they shovel comes under scrutiny.

  • freeinpa

    How can you call the Matthews show MSM? Old Chrissy has about 5 viewers beside his wife and mother

  • murzee

    Are we not desperate to fix the government? It is truly perverse that we are forced to trust the insurance company CEO more than our elective representatives

    http://evimedgroup.blogspot.com/2009/08/sick-vs-dead.html

  • deconstructiva

    …there’s certainly bipartisan support for / from the Medical-Industrial Complex, especially with former reps. (Tauzin? hello?) and staffers. I think this link has been brought up before, so why not post it again?
    http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/projects/2009/healthcare_lobbyist_complex/

  • shepherdwong

    Yes, all Republicans (I’m talking about professional Republicans, not indoctrinated authoritarian-following tools) and that’s no hyperbole.
    .
    And unions, teachers, firefighters, cops, auto workers, construction workers (even lawyers), etc., etc., are all just individual, average citizens with generally shared interests in public policy whereas corporations have much more parochial interests that are often in conflict with the greater public good. Corporations are just fine doing what they do – seek profit. What they should never be allowed to do is write the public policies of this country, which is just what is happening. This really couldn’t be a better example of the ignorant and disaffected rising up against their own public policy interests, having been duped again by narrow, harmful corporate interests in the name of “conservative” dogma. Pitiful.

  • http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2009/08/17/swamp-land/ Swamp Land « Sister Toldjah

    [...] The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry [...]

  • http://healthcare09.net/2009/08/17/who-knew-tom-daschle-moonlighting-for-the-insurance-industry/ Who Knew: Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry » HealthCare 09

    [...] Who Knew: Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry – Swampland – TI…. [...]

  • freeinpa

    Yes union workers and teachers are just ordinary citizens for the public good if by public good you mean them.

    Spending for education accounts for nearly 5% of GDP and has grown over 25% in the last 5 years. Most of the largess has gone to union salaries and yet tests scores at best remain flat to down. Unions fight school choice (except for the liberal elites’ children) at every turn. So much fo rthe public good.

    Steel, Auto and Airlines have all been driven to bankruptcy by ridiculous union contracts. Other manufacturing jobs have been driven off shore for the same reason. Huge contracts with blue chip benefits and some of the crappiest cars ever built. Yet again I assume for the public good.

    The big dark secret of health care is tort reform which never gets mentioned by the left as part of this process. Right they are just looking out for the poor lowly citizen. That’s why they collect a third to half of the extorted awards.

    Remeber when GM had issues with an exploding gas tank on a Chevy truck? Lawyers carted away millions and the poor lowly citizen received a nominal coupon to BUY another GM TRUCK.

    What you see is people saying “I am tired of you spending my money”. If they are duped as you seem to think, it is their decision to be duped. They were duped in November, they were duped with the porkulus plan, they were duped with the Cash for Clunkers. Now they say NO MORE

  • freeinpa

    Yes but the political hacks on the left squealed like stuck pigs over term limits. The cry was we don’t want to lose that experience. I think it is worh the risk.

    10 years and out with a pension not to exceed a typical Social Security payout. And make it legal to represent or lobby and branch of the government for 10 years after leaving.

    Most problems would be self corrected.

  • sheelah715

    Oh, my Gawd!

  • Tom in The Swamp

    Dick Armey lives to lie. That’s what he gets paid for.

    He also lied last week on PBS Newshour, quite blatantly, but Rachel wasn’t there to call him out on it.

    http://bit.ly/nvVxc

  • shepherdwong

    Good. Now we know who you stand against (liberals, union workers, the 47 million uninsured, the 70% who want a public option, etc.) and, therefore, who you stand with: insurance companies. Like I said, a near perfect experiment in where each of our sensibilities and loyalties lie.

  • shepherdwong

    Easier (and more constitutional): make them run for re-election on limited, in-state, personal campaign contributions of their constituents.

  • eeiieeiio

    I know this article is about Daschle, but I have to say what we’re all thinking. You know what talkin’ about. That glorious, part-down-the-middle, big, bouncy, coils of fabulousness that was Tom Coburn’s hair on Meet the Press. How about writing something about the “Secret life of Tom Coburn’s Hair”?

  • freeinpa

    shepherdwong

    See math is not a great subject for you. Maybe you should complain to the teachers union. Oh you can’t they done’t care.

    over 80% are happy with their HC coverage so with the 70% who want a public option that is 150%. Did you include Canada in your numbers? Of the 47 million that you claim are uninsured most are young and do not want coverage. Freedom of choice remember America.

  • freeinpa

    Maybe a news show with the Breck Girl – John Edwards

  • freeinpa

    So you are sayin gthat most liberal journalists are clueless

  • http://www.nyegateway.com/2009/08/health-insurance-corporations-have-already-won-reform.html Health Insurance corporations have already won reform | Nye – Gateway to Nevada’s Rurals

    [...] like a cesspool of deals doesn’t it? But wait! There’s more. Time published an article yesterday, about this same messy cesspool,  which you should read as [...]

  • http://quiscus.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/august-18-2009/ August 18, 2009 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

    [...] on Meet the Press ostensibly to analyze the health care reform debate despite the fact that, as Time’s Michael Scherer documented, Daschle currently works for numerous health insurance industry interests, relationships completely [...]

  • http://evangelicalgateway.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/morning-report-august-18-lobbyist-daschle-sanfords-kool-aid-flying-amino-acids/ Morning Report, August 18: Lobbyist Daschle, Sanford’s Kool-Aid, Flying Amino Acids, and the Recklessness of John Edwards « Evangelical Gateway

    [...] Speaking of Michael Sherer, he has an interesting post over at Swampland on how former Senate Majority Leader, and Obama’s first nominee as [...]

  • http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/08/18/15386/ The Much-Less Secret Life Of Howard Dean, Drug Industry Advisor – Swampland – TIME.com

    [...] Scherer Tuesday, August 18, 2009 at 4:49 pm 5 Comments • Trackback (0) Yesterday, I wrote a piece about Tom Daschle, who went on Meet The Press to talk about the need to defeat the insurance [...]

  • http://botd.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/top-posts-1210/ Top Posts « WordPress.com

    [...] The Secret Life of Tom Daschle, Moonlighting For The Insurance Industry This is how Washington really works: Even a top liberal advocate for taking a strong stand against the insurance [...] [...]

  • http://www.scholarsandrogues.com/2009/08/23/tom-daschle-when-is-a-resource-really-a-lobbyist/ Scholars and Rogues » Tom Daschle: When is a ‘resource’ really a lobbyist?

    [...] complains Time’s Michael Scherer: Left unmentioned was the fact that Daschle, in his capacity as a high-paid consultant at the law [...]

  • http://www.volconvo.com/forums/society-rights/27481-rights-vs-privilege-5.html#post649179 Rights vs Privilege – Page 5 – Volconvo Debate Forums

    [...] for them granting privileges to the corporate managers while giving bones to the lower class? Ask Tom Daschle. And all on the backs of the working man. Perhaps their salaries should be increased. I would [...]

  • http://www.volconvo.com/forums/society-rights/27481-rights-vs-privilege-6.html#post649363 Rights vs Privilege – Page 6 – Volconvo Debate Forums

    [...] for them granting privileges to the corporate managers while giving bones to the lower class? Ask Tom Daschle. And all on the backs of the working man. Perhaps their salaries should be increased. I would [...]

  • http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/03/27/obamacare-crony-capitalism-and-big-media/ Obamacare, Crony Capitalism and Big Media « The Greenroom

    [...] over American healthcare. The main thing that changed was Daschle’s clients used to be mostly Big Insurance, while at DLA Piper, they seem to include pharmacies and pharmacos. That, and the likely pay [...]

  • http://www.favstocks.com/obamacare-crony-capitalism-and-big-media/28881561/ Obamacare, Crony Capitalism and Big Media | FavStocks

    [...] over American healthcare. The main thing that changed was Daschle’s clients used to be mostly Big Insurance, while at DLA Piper, they seem to include pharmacies and pharmacos. That, and the likely pay [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus