Better Luck Next Time

Back in the fall of 2008, the conservative Christian group the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) organized “Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” a sort-of civil disobedience event for which pastors were encouraged to use their pulpits to endorse John McCain and challenge IRS regulations prohibiting such political activity by tax-exempt institutions. Now, in a somewhat surprising move, the IRS has informed some of the several dozen churches that participated that they are no longer under investigation.You might think this would please those who stood to lose their tax-exempt status. Oh, no. Disappointed, the ADF has announced plans to hold another Pulpit Freedom Sunday on September 27, in the hopes of more successfully baiting the IRS.

Why would they do this? Some religious leaders have long chafed at the requirement that they abstain from political endorsements in order to maintain their tax-exempt status. (That includes liberals as well as conservatives; All Saints Episcopal in Pasadena found itself investigated by the IRS after a 2004 pre-election sermon, although in that case the church had not set out to challenge the IRS rule.) The regulation, which holds that tax-exempt organizations cannot “participate in any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for political office,” has been in place since the 1950s.

Over the years, a number of religious organizations and publications, including The Christian Century, have chosen to forfeit their tax-exempt status rather than comply with the requirement. What the ADF-inspired churches are seeking to do is something else–actively participate in political campaigns and yet continue to benefit from tax-exempt status.

They’re also, it’s fair to guess, hoping to fuel resentment among religious conservatives. Oft forgotten in the history of the Religious Right is the role an earlier IRS fight played in launching that conservative movement. In his book Thy Kingdom Come, Columbia professor Randall Balmer tells the story of how Paul Weyrich used an IRS investigation into Bob Jones University to gin up fears and resentments among religious conservatives. The IRS sought to revoke the Christian school’s tax-exempt status because the university forbade interracial dating. And while the investigation began in 1975, pre-dating Jimmy Carter’s election, Weyrich and others succeeded in placing blame on “Carter’s IRS.”

Here’s an excerpt from Balmer:

Weyrich, whose conservative activism dates at least as far back as the Barry Goldwater campaign in 1964, had been trying for years to energize evangelical voters over school prayer, abortion, or the proposed equal rights amendment to the Constitution. “I was trying to get those people interested in those issues and I utterly failed,” he recalled in an interview in the early 1990s. “What changed their mind was Jimmy Carter’s intervention against the Christian schools, trying to deny them tax-exempt status on the basis of so-called de facto segregation.”
[snip]
“What caused the movement to surface,” Weyrich reiterated,”was the federal government’s moves against Christian schools.” The IRS threat against segregated schools, he said, “enraged the Christian community.”

In a letter to pastors notifying them that it is dropping the more recent investigation, the IRS has cited a “procedural problem” in going forward. It’s unclear what that might be. But it was an open secret among religious conservatives that Pulpit Freedom Sunday would provide a handy Plan B in the event of Obama’s election: If the IRS acted as expected and revoked the churches’ status, they could then declare that “Obama’s IRS” was muzzling pastors in their pulpits. For whatever reason, the administration has not given them that easy talking point just yet.

Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Jim Bourg / Reuters

    At CPAC, Romney Stresses Conservative Credentials

    Three days after a trifecta of losses underlined lingering questions about his ability to win over the Republican Party’s base, Mitt Romney arrived at CPAC to allay skeptics’ fears. Throughout his second bid for the GOP nomination, Romney has made his business bona fides the centerpiece of his candidacy. But on Friday, before a packed room at the annual conservative confab, he sought to emphasize the record he compiled in Massachusetts. “I was a severely conservative governor,” he told the crowd. “I know conservatism, because I have lived conservatism.” 

    Romney: I Was A 'Severely Conservative' GovernorHuffPost Politics

    Pablo Martinez Monsivais / AP

    Mired in the Sticky Politics of Health and Faith, Obama Shifts on Contraception

    In the face of mounting pressure from Catholic leaders and politicians, the White House on Friday tweaked its position on contraception coverage mandates in the Affordable Care Act. Rather than require large religious institutions like Catholic colleges and hospitals to provide employees with free health insurance coverage for contraception, insurance companies themselves will have to pick up the tab.

  • Paul-no not that one

    There are no government shekels without government shackles.

  • arbitrarystring

    Tax all churches. Problem solved. I don’t understand why babbling on about a make-believe magic space elf qualifies for tax-exempt status anyway.

  • deconstructiva

    Thanks, Amy, this is a really good post. I’ve been wary of church / politics mix for a long time, esp. the “social conservatives”. But going back to the beginning, literally, didn’t Jesus say to separate what to give to Caesar and to God? Thus, why are some of these churches (whom I’d accuse of not following Christian teachings, but I digress) involving themselves in partisan politics at all? Nope, it’s not questioning faith but quite the opposite. Thoughts, Amy?

  • Paul-no not that one

    “Some religious leaders have long chafed at the requirement that they abstain from political endorsements in order to maintain their tax-exempt status. (That includes liberals as well as conservatives; All Saints Episcopal in Pasadena found itself investigated by the IRS after a 2004 pre-election sermon, although in that case the church had not set out to challenge the IRS rule.) ”

    You show a profound misreading of what the All Saints episode was about.
    But I get the need to make sure people think everything is equal.

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Because they are non-profit organizations? At least mine is. And even us liberal religious types have to watch the regulations on political activity and endorsements from the pulpit. Of course, we can’t threaten parishioners with hellfire; we just withhold coffee.

  • Cliff

    AS, you’re alive!
    .
    For whatever reason, the administration has not given them that easy talking point just yet.
    .
    And strangely unable to draw a clear conclusion despite clearly-stated conditions and logic!

  • abhiag

    And re-kindle the now sort of dormant smear campaign, that Obama is a Muslim bent on destroying Christianity.

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Sorry, my comment was supposed to be 2.1, not 3.1. I am not that illogical, yet. Back to Twitter for me….

  • ohiolib

    Because the people who do believe in magic space elves get very very upset when they think you’re penalize them. In short, more trouble than it’s worth. Plus, that’s running into shaky First amendment issues.

  • deconstructiva

    …and actually please accept my apologies. I thought your answer did address my rant. Maybe it does too! Do some groups think they can involve themselves in politics due to their religious and tax-free statuses – no IRS, no tax $, no problem? Withholding coffee and angel food cake can be a highly effective behavior control too.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    This post is particularly valuable because it makes clear how much the power of the RR relies upon victimization, real or imagined.

    I found this quote particulary interesting:

    The IRS threat against segregated schools, he said, “enraged the Christian community.”

    I know I need to consider the source, but the use of the phrase “Christian Community” in this context is needless to say, infuriating.

    The “Christian community’ was also responsible for bring an end to segregation in the first place. Claiming the label ‘Christian’ for the Hate-R-Us subset would be (if I believed in such things) blasphemous!

  • trifecta55

    Amy, the All Saints situation was different. The minister had spoken out against the Iraq War and was investigated for that.

    These right wing preachers explicitly endorsed a presidential candidate from the pulpit. I know we need “balance” and all sides do the same thing, but they are not exactly equal.

    Secondly, isn’t tax exempt status enough? So many of these slick right wing operations purchase property, cars, etc in the “church’s name” as a tax dodge. Now, they want to rally the troops on election day after receiving this benefit as well? It’s very simple. You want to endorse a candidate, don’t do it on the taxpayer dime.

  • trifecta55

    I mentioned that below.

    All Saints was apples and oranges. The Bush IRS were going after a liberal church whose preacher dare spoke out against the war.

    Not exactly the same thing as an organized McCain endorsathon.

  • http://www.simonvinkenoog.nl/beeld/Yogi%20-%20Annelies%20Rigter.jpg yogi

    “AS, you’re alive!”

    Much like Jesus after Easter, Amy too needs a long break before resuming preaching, luckily Santa’s watching in their absence.

  • Friar Tuck

    Over the years, a number of religious organizations and publications, including The Christian Century, have chosen to forfeit their tax-exempt status rather than comply with the requirement. What the ADF-inspired churches are seeking to do is something else–actively participate in political campaigns and yet continue to benefit from tax-exempt status.
    .
    In other words, the “ADF-inspired churches” want to have their cake and eat it too.
    .
    Why, Amy Sullivan, do you not analyze this in the light of 2,000 years of Christian theology? That is your role here, is it not?
    .
    Since you’re not up to it, here goes – and it’s pretty simple: Jesus did not suffer, die, and rise again in the name of anybody “having their cake and eating it too.”
    .
    You really need to read the entire letter to the Galatians, Amy Sullivan, and do some deep thinking before your next post – or save yourself and the rest of us the bother of your useless stenography.

  • Friar Tuck

    joyo, are you Lutheran? That’s one of the best examples of “Minnesota Nice” I’ve ever run across, and I know some Jedi masters.

  • destor23

    I’m with you. Either that or exempt all my religious activities from taxation and I’ll start worshiping martinis.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    “The IRS threat against segregated schools enraged the Christian community.”
    .
    What Christian community does he speak of? While I cannot speak informatively of all Christians, the Catholic Church endorsed prolonged efforts of desegregation and, in fact, often desegregated Catholic schools around the nation well before the public schools were racially integrated. Both St. Louis and D.C. area Catholic schools, for example, were desegregated prior to the end of WWII, in the early ’40s. Joseph Rummel, the Archbishop of New Orleans began integrating Louisiana Catholic schools as early as 1948 and continued to fight segregation until he was able to formally desegregate the entire diocese parochial schools in 1962. In 1958 the American Catholic bishops issued a Pastoral on Racism, “Discrimination and Christian Conscience” in which they argued that segregation cannot be justified by social conditions or alleged equality in separation, while also asserting their belief that enforced segregation is incompatible with Christian views on humanity and equality. Throughout the post-war segregation era the Vatican, which came down decidedly in support of equality and racial integration, appointed pro-desegregation Bishops across the nation. It is interesting that the authoritarian hierarchy that the Church is often criticized for became a tool through which Catholic theology could be enforced down the line from bishops to parish priests to combat the ills of a segregated American society.
    .

  • trifecta55

    Yeah, but they are papists who worship Jesus’ mommy.

    Seriously though, I think the Catholic church has done the greatest good and the most evil in the world in the name of Christianity.

    It’s a paradox, but there ya go. Only evangelicals are real Christians. King James learned how Jesus talked in English and he recorded his words accurately.

    To be serious, I admire and loathe the Catholic Church sometimes at the same time. In these discussions though, “christian” seems to mean evangelical which is really quite a joke.

  • deconstructiva

    “And re-kindle the now sort of dormant smear campaign, that Obama is a Muslim bent on destroying Christianity.”
    .
    …but SNL Weekend Update Thursday’s Crazy McCain Rally Lady said Obama is a muslin, will change the White House to a pyramid (well there is a pyramid on the back of the dollar bill, coincidence?), and cavorts with terriers. (the sketch is on hulu)

  • Paul-no not that one

    Ha I skipped over the Paul Weyrich knowing him to be nothing more than a republican activist.
    I didn’t imagine anyone would take his views on Christianity seriously.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    If they want to investigate some Christians my vote if for “C” Street and The Family.

  • Paul-no not that one

    Shhhhhhh Dee!

    Polite people have agreed not to mention that.

  • Cliff

    Accountability for one’s actions?
    .
    My word, I’ve never heard of such a thing. What fiendish notion will they devise next?

  • textee

    Every religious cult of the Democrat party “participate[s] in … political campaign[s] on behalf of [Democrat] candidate[s] ….”

    When can we expect the IRS to start prosecuting said religious cults, to wit: the pagan left, the atheist left, the feminist left (hahahahahaha!), the earth worshipping left, the socialist left, the race baiting left and the fundamentalist homosexualist left?

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    Um, I’m not seeing much religious emphasis in your aforementioned “religious cults.”

  • Cliff

    It helps to think of textee as being more of a messed up printer than a human.

  • Exiled_At_Home (formerly neo)

    That’s classic, Cliff…

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    I think someone with nothing better to do should try to program a textee-post generator. It only requires a single seed thought to create years worth of posts and compared to this: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/ it should be a snap.

  • pafro

    I wish the CIA would do productive domestic counter-terrorism activities like fixing up these church leaders with dead prostitutes while the cameras are rolling. Instead they spy on Grannies against Bombs.

  • pafro

    The false equivalency garbage is the most toxic trait of the traditional media. It also an extremely lazy habit.

  • cfukara

    Aha! There is Amy!

    ” .. re-kindle the now sort of dormant smear campaign, that Obama is a Muslim bent on destroying Christianity. ..”
    I doubt that BHO is afraid of that. One must have athick skin.

    Is you want to have a say in the politics of how tax revenue is to be spent, then you MUST contribute into the tax-revenue kitty. SIMPLE.

    Else if you put nothing into the kitty, then shut up: You have no say and no stake to claim.

    { That covers the churches, temples, North Koreans, those French, the mosques and synagogues .. Now, about those who-loot-our-tax-revenue-kitty-so-that-30-million-Americans-starve heathen Israelis who don’t even speak our English ..}

  • sacredh

    Welcome back Amy.

    Hello fellow heathens.

    Withhold the coffee and cookies.

    Prepare burnt offerings (dinner when the MIL cooks).

  • sacredh

    Note to MIL: The smoke alarm is NOT an oven timer.

  • cfukara

    Ahh. :-) Those good old days of bachelorhood …

  • sacredh

    How someone could be a housewife for almost 50 years and still make every meal taste like it came out of a can still amazes me.

  • cfukara

    Holier than thou?
    ” .. do some deep thinking before your next post – ”
    And Jesus said, “Let he who is without sin of (non-deep thinking) cast the first stone.”
    {Please note that Jesus would NOT have dared issue such a good-faith challenge (that presumes that one embraces good values/virtues, good citizenship, patriotism and all that gooey stuff) to Americans of “The Culture of Lying” and the mostly certifiably insane.}

    http://www.cheatingculture.com/

    ” .. save yourself and the rest of us the bother of your useless stenography.”
    And Jesus said to Friar ‘who-probably-knows-a-child–molesting-priest-or-two’ Tuck, ” Sonny, go and do likewise.”

  • cfukara

    Links not shown:

    “The Culture of Lying”
    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4341.htm

    “and the mostly certifiably insane”
    http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth/chapter2/sec2_1.html

  • cfukara

    Indeed!

  • jcapan

    “Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.”

    Marx

  • http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/theclog/2009/08/06/conservative-churches-not-satisfied-with-irs-decision/ Conservative churches not satisfied with IRS decision | theCLog

    [...] Read more from TIME Magazine’s “Swampland” blog. [...]

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Baptized Lutheran, Confirmed Episcopalian, born-again Unitarian Universalist since 1982. (Just had a chalice tattooed on my left bicep for my 60th birthday.)

  • http://nicewhitelady.blogspot.com/ joyomama

    Baptized Lutheran, Confirmed Episcopalian, born-again Unitarian Universalist since 1982. (Just had a chalice tattooed on my left bicep for my 60th birthday.)

    arg. just put my comment in the wrong place, can’t delete. grrrrrr

  • apollyon07

    Aren’t Churches tax-exempt because they are non-profit organizations due to the charity work they do?

  • phi1ippe

    “Plus, that’s running into shaky First amendment issues.”
    .
    The fact taxes are not levied on all groups equally is a shaky First amendment issue. Government should not have the power to regulate what is and isn’t a religious organization.

  • hubbmax

    arbitrarystring:

    AMEN brother/(sister)!!!!!!

    SEE the forest!! (For God’s sake……!)

  • sacredh

    In theory yes. In reality no. They’re tax exempt because of political clout. They openly engage in political activities which by law should take away their tax exempt status. There are many churches out there that do do a great deal of good. Others are nothing more than fronts for political groups with an agenda.

  • http://fiestamovement.com/agents/view/58 agent58

    It’s sad to see religon and politics in such a manor. The only time it ever occurs on a national level is during campagin season. It’s so obvious whats going on. Most political leaders do not even go to church until it’s time to gain support. http://fiestamovement.com/agents/view/58

  • http://leisureguy.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/will-political-churches-give-up-their-tax-exempt-status/ Will political churches give up their tax-exempt status? « Later On

    [...] in Daily life, Government, Law, Religion at 10:01 am by LeisureGuy Interesting column by Amy Sullivan in TIME’s Swampland blog: Back in the fall of 2008, the conservative [...]

  • http://www.city-data.com/forum/christianity/735580-churches-allowed-urge-people-protest-abortion-2.html#post10320258 are churches allowed to urge people to protest abortion? – Christianity – Page 2 – City-Data Forum

    [...] [...]

  • 4liberty

    Better luck next time, Amy… when it comes to the facts.

    You wrote:“pastors were encouraged to use their pulpits to endorse John McCain”
    · Not accurate. Participating pastors were not directed in any way as to what they should say about one candidate or another. ADF reached out to a wide range of clergy from numerous denominations, many of whom would clearly have been supportive of then-candidate Obama had they participated in Pulpit Freedom Sunday.

    You wrote: “the IRS has informed some of the several dozen churches that participated that they are no longer under investigation.”
    · Not accurate. Only Rev. Gus Booth’s file has been closed. No other pastor of the 33 who participated in the Pulpit Initiative last year has heard anything from the IRS.

    You wrote: “Disappointed, the ADF has announced plans to hold another Pulpit Freedom Sunday on September 27, in the hopes of more successfully baiting the IRS.”
    · Not accurate. “Pulpit Freedom Sunday II” was planned long before the IRS closed Rev. Booth’s file, so this year’s event was not in response to this news. It is ADF’s intention to have the Johnson Amendment declared unconstitutional, so the Pulpit Initiative will exist as long as it is in place. So obviously, there will be a “Pulpit Freedom Sunday III” in 2010 unless the unconstitutional IRS speech restrictions are overturned before then.

    To see all the factual errors in this article: check out: http://www.adfmedia.org/Articles/Details/2906

blog comments powered by Disqus