Judging Sonia

Opening statements have begun in the confirmation hearings of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. Today is bound to be bland: 19 opening statements from committee members followed by the highlight, Sotomayor’s opening remarks. Tomorrow and Wednesday will be the crucial days with senators taking turns questioning President Obama’s nominee. Here’s a webstory from me on what to expect the opposition to focus on.

Sotomayor was greeted by about 16 pro-life protesters this morning, including Randall Terry, head of Operation Rescue, and Norma McCorvey, “Jane Roe” from Roe v. Wade who has since found Jesus and become a forceful voice for the pro-life movement. “We’re here to remind senators, especially Republican senators who ran on pro-life platforms, the importance of opposing this nomination,” she said, holding a bloody baby doll and standing before a banner that read, “Senators, Stop the Slaughter, Filibuster Sotomayor.” Unfortunately for them, abortion is not looking to be much of an issue in these hearings since Sotomayor is not likely to change the balance of the court. About 45 minutes in to the hearing one of those protesters, Bob Jones, 48, a civil servant from Centreville, Virginia started yelling, “Senator what about the unborn? Abortion is murder!” Jones was promptly shown out by Capitol Police. Jones and his 13-year-old son, Thomas, were dressed in black suits invoking the Blues Brothers. “We’re on a mission from God,” Jones said outside the Capitol.

Sotomayor entered room 216 in the Senate Hart Office building flanked by Senators Patrick Leahy and Jeff Sessions, the chairman and ranking Republican of the Judiciary Committee, respectively. In a blue jacket, black skirt and shirt she was five minutes early and spent that time posing for photos with senators. She then introduced her immediately family – brother, mother, stepfather, sister-in-law and various nieces, nephews and godchildren – sitting behind her to her right. “If I introduced everybody that’s family-like, I’d be here all morning,” were her first laughing words to the committee.

Thus far (in the first hour), the hot button topic continues to be empathy. “Call it empathy, call it prejudice, or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it is not law,” Sessions said in his opening remarks. “In truth, it is more akin to politics. And politics has no place in the courtroom.”

Subscribe to Jay Newton-Small on Facebook
Related Topics: Uncategorized
  • Latest on Swampland

    Morning Must Reads: Secret

    Obama Administration Blocks Global Health Fund To Fight Disease In Developing NationsHuffPost Politics

    SAUL LOEB / AFP / Getty Images

    A Tale of Two Economies: Mitt Romney vs. Republican Governors

    The great recession has left the state of Ohio battered and bruised–and Mitt Romney would have you believe it’s Barack Obama’s fault. Writing in the Cleveland Plain-Dealer on May 4, Romney advised Ohioans that the President has delivered them “paltry results,” and that their state is in need of “a fundamental change in direction.”

  • tjladder

    To put empathy and prejudice in the same sentence as a way of saying they are the same, affirms the slight intelligence of Senator Sessions.

  • ilikechips

    Bork her!!!!!!! turnabout is fair play. Anyone here remember those hearings.

  • Art Pepper

    So the GOP opposition to Sotomayor comes down to two things:

    1. They are against empathy and sympathy.

    2. She did not strike down the laws that they think she should have struck down.

  • queencersei

    I just hope that if the going gets rough her family doesn’t start crying and railing like John Robert’s wife did.

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    Art Pepper, it’s actually only one thing — she’s not Republican.
    .
    Jay, please keep your head down this week, because these people believe in shooting their way into submission.

  • http://www.twitter.com/jnsmall Jay Newton-Small

    queencersei: You’re thinking of Sam Alito’s wife… And the Sotomayors look pretty hardy.
    JNS

  • ilikechips

    Republicans have alot more class JNS and won’t be as vitriolic towards her than the way Democrats question her. suddenly everybody is worried about how she is questioned ..when the scumbag libtards tried to rip aprt Roberts and Alito..it’s O.K. as long it is against a republican..very funny

  • grape_crush

    Unfortunately for them, abortion is not looking to be much of an issue in these hearings…

    Then why devote half of your comment to describing their protests? Particularly to Randall Terry, who plays Gerry Adams to the anti-choice movement’s IRA.

    “Call it empathy, call it prejudice, or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it is not law,” Sessions said..“In truth, it is more akin to politics. And politics has no place in the courtroom.”

    Grandstanding. Sessions has been around long enough to know better; he’s probably still sore about that [Federal judgeship Reagan nominated him to that never got out of committee]…

    Of course, judging by the way Session approaches politics, there’s [no room for empathy there either]:

    In June 2009, during testimony by a 42-year-old Filipino woman who was scheduled to be deported in April 2009 despite being the mother of two American children and having a relationship for 23 years with an American woman, Sessions was audibly heard relaying to one of his aides, “Enough with the histrionics” when the woman’s 12-year-old son began crying during the testimony.

    What a prick.

  • queencersei

    I think you are mistaking class for fear. Politically the GOP can’t afford to alienate the Hispanic population anymore then they already have. If they think they can get away with it, they will shred her like cheese.

  • mrtoads

    chips – do you even remember those hearings? Do you actually have more than the vaguest idea why Robert Bork was not confirmed? Or are you simply mindlessly reciting knee-jerk right-wing ideological fantasies?

    As for Sotomayor, expecting anything other than wild-eyed, irrational, blatantly hypocritical ranting from the likes of Sessions is a fool’s game.

  • http://phd9.blogspot.com Paul Dirks

    The irony is that for all their griping about ‘activist judges’, the very ruling that Conservatives are railing about are the ones where Sotomayer failed to take the activist position.

    They’ve already shot themselves in the foot with their word choices.

  • 53_3

    ilikechips:

    Did you forget something? Like the fact that you actually need the basketball in your hands before you can score with it?

    I hate to say it, ilikechips, but yer dumber than a warm rock on a windowsill.

    Nice dribbling, though…

  • 53_3

    “Republicans have alot more class JNS and won’t be as vitriolic towards her than the way Democrats question her.”

    ilikechips:
    Just what planet are you on, anyway?

  • Dee in Columbia MD

    What ever planet it is, it is a different one than the rest of us inhabit. It never ceases to amaze me that Republicans have no concept of how mean, prickish, and coarse they sound most of the time. I think they think it they sound strong when they act like they’re devoid of human emotion. Unfortunately, for them human emotion is the only way to distinguish them from say a rock, as in dumb as.

  • ilikechips

    Democraps in the hearing still think it’s the hearing for Roberts..Hilarious..taking cheap shots at Robertsa and Alito. Typical libs..do as I say..not as I do,

  • destor23

    Politics has no place in the court room! Now, let’s get on with these political judicial confirmation hearings…

  • Matt

    The Republicans on the JC truly made fools of themselves today with their disrespectful and over-the-top anti-Obama/anti-Sotomayor rhetoric. The American people are watching…

    http://www.political-buzz.com/

  • 53_3

    Well, as you can see, Dee, ilikechips is certainly “staying the course”.

    I wish I could put reality on “relentlessly ignore” too!

  • 53_3

    Hell, destor23, empathy has no place in the courtroom either! If some state passes a law, say, to strip all gays of all possessions and stick ‘em in gas ovens, who is the court to intervene!

    Remember that Rehnquist said that if he was directed to send this country to hell, he certainly would have no qualms whatsoever in doing it.

    Now that’s the kind of guy I want wiggling the levers of law…

  • deconstructiva

    Where is abortion specifically banned in the Bible? I couldn’t find it. No, misquoting the 10 commandments thingy doesn’t count. Murder and abortion are not directly linked, fallacious reasoning used here by protesters. Their raison d’etre is missing. Even the original Mr. Conservative – Goldwater – thought that issue was a private matter and govt. should stay out. If the protesters don’t like her empathy or her outfit then whatever, but did they read the Bible lately? If it’s not in the Good Book, why are they protesting her? Or did I miss a chapter here? puzzled….

  • Rorschach

    Weren’t there only about a dozen protesters? They should be ignored. If all it takes to get paid attention to in the media is for me and some friends to make a scene, that’s a problem. The two that dressed up for it are obviously just there for attention. In sports a fan that rushes on the field isn’t shown on television. I wish the media applied similar rules when it’s such a pathetically small protest (see the Letterman ‘protest’).

  • bobcn1

    All too often it’s the politics of the protesters and, more importantly, the politics of the media gatekeepers that determines who gets attention.

    I vividly remember the thorough coverage (with numerous photos and interviews) that a pro Iraq war rally received in my city about 5 years back. I saw the march. It extended the full width of the 4 lane road it took place on, but wasn’t quite as long as it was wide. No more than 200 marchers were there, and they only marched a few blocks. The newspaper and TV photos of it were framed in such a way as to make the rally seem huge.

    By contrast, a 50,000 person anti-war rally that took place several weeks earlier was almost completely ignored by the local papers and TV. It had extended for miles and went on for most of the day, but the local media decided it wasn’t worth covering. The media had been there, with their cameras ready, waiting for the local anarchist crazies to cause trouble. But the small group of crazies that showed up behaved themselves, so the reporters lost interest.

  • retiredsoldier

    The Boork hearings took place 22 years ago. Many in the Government today certainly remember those days.

blog comments powered by Disqus